Next Article in Journal
Smoke Dispersion from Forest Fire Combustion Products—Implementation at Strategic, Tactical and Operational Level
Previous Article in Journal
Inversion Techniques on Etna’s Volcanic Emissions and the Impact of Aeolus on Quantitative Dispersion Modeling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Sentinel-5P/TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument CH4 and CO Total Column Validation over the Thessaloniki Collaborative Carbon Column Observing Network Site, Greece †

1
Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics, Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Campus Box 149, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research (IMK-ASF), P.O. Box 3640, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
3
SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Niels Bohrweg 4, 2333 CA Leiden, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 16th International Conference on Meteorology, Climatology and Atmospheric Physics—COMECAP 2023, Athens, Greece, 25–29 September 2023.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2023, 26(1), 188; https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2023026188
Published: 12 September 2023

Abstract

:
Carbon monoxide, XCO, and methane, XCH4, column-averaged dry-air mole fractions (DMFs), observed by the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) on board Sentinel-5P (S-5P), are validated against those obtained from a Bruker ground-based low-resolution Fourier transform spectrometer, EM27/SUN, operating in the framework and according to requirements of the Collaborative Carbon Column Observing Network (COCCON), in Thessaloniki, Greece, on a mid-latitude urban site. The current operational S5P/TROPOMI observations show very good agreement with the respective FTIR measurements and capture both their seasonal variability and pollution episodes. XCO reported the highest concentrations during the fire episodes in summer 2021, when its daily mean value reached a maximum of 0.134 ± 0.015 ppm. XCH4 shows a slight annual increase of 0.02 ppm, with the highest concentrations during early 2022 (approximately 1.92 ppm). The satellite CH4 and CO products have been recently reprocessed with updated CH4, CO and H2O cross-sections, among other improvements, bringing noticeable changes in the pre-existing biases of S5P products against the FTIR ground-based data. We report that, for this mid-latitude station, mean biases and standard deviations fall well within mission requirements for XCH4 and XCO (−0.01 ± 0.6% and 0.62 ± 4.2% for XCH4 and XCO, respectively), underlying the significance of satellite measurements as a valuable supplement to ground-based data for the purpose of greenhouse gas monitoring. The results presented in this work for the Thessaloniki FTIR instrument are in strong agreement with FTIR locations in the middle latitudes.

1. Introduction

Climate change and global warming effects are mainly driven by the on-going increase in the abundances of greenhouse gases in the Earth’s atmosphere, in both the Southern and Northern Hemisphere, where they are measured using different measurement techniques [1]. Approximately 16% of the total radiative forcing affect can be attributed to methane [2], with a lifetime of over a decade in the atmosphere and a GWP between 28 and 36 over 100 years. Throughout the industrial era, CH4 has shown an increase in its global annual average of 2.5 times, from 720 ppb to 1800 ppb [3], surpassing that of CO2. Carbon monoxide (CO), while not a greenhouse gas itself, strongly affects tropospheric chemistry by removing OH radicals and thus interfering with the oxidation capacity of the atmosphere. Accurately measuring the abundances of these gases as well as studying their variations (spatial and temporal), facilitates the study of their sink/source balance and emission levels and enables the design of the appropriate polices in order to address the global warming mitigation issue.
In addition to the more traditional ground-based network monitoring [4,5], the TROPOMI instrument, on the S5P platform, provides space-borne data of DMFs of the greenhouse gases of interest.

2. Methodology

Daily values of reprocessed homogenized TROPOMI CO and CH4 L2 data were corrected in OFFL, version 02.04.00 (via Copernicus Open Data Access Hub (https://s5phub.copernicus.eu/, accessed on 2 May 2023). Implementation of the processor update (v. 02.02.00, 1 July 2021) introduces a different type of spectroscopy and changes in the overall biases and can explain the decrease in XCH4 and XCO bias [6]. A quality assurance filter of 1.0 was implemented for both datasets to ensure cloud-free observations. Validation of these data is provided by both quarterly validation reports [6] by the Mission Performance Center Validation Analysis Facility (http://mpc-vdaf.tropomi.eu/, accessed on 2 May 2023) and recent papers on TROPOMI data validation [7,8].
In this work, CO and CH4 dry-air column mixing ratios, provided by the EM27/SUN FTIR instrument, were collocated within an hour with respective TROPOMI data from Thessaloniki’s overpass, within a radius of 100 km for CH4 and 50 km for CO.
The OFFL TROPOMI corrected products were used in this study [7,9,10].

3. Results

In the following section, the comparison between the methane and carbon monoxide total columns from EM27/SUN ground-based measurements and space-borne TROPOMI data is presented. Daily means of both FTIR and TROPOMI dry-air column mixing ratios are presented (Figure 1) for clear/partially clouded sky conditions for XCH4 (a) and XCO (b). Also, in Figure 2, the relative mean bias of XCH4 (a) and XCO (b) for the standard (green line) and corrected (orange line) products are compared. TROPOMI observations capture the time series of FTIR measurements for both products, and in the case of XCO, this peaks during summer 2021 as a consequence of fire episodes.
Furthermore, in Figure 3, the relative bias is shown (for both XCH4 and XCO) correlated to the distance of S-5P pixels from the FTIR station, which is located in the city center. XCH4 reveals a decrease in relative bias when the distance from the FTIR station increases (Figure 3a). The relative bias of XCO follows almost the same pattern as XCH4 with the distance. However, some outliers during summer 2021 indicate the long-distance transport of XCO due to the large fires that occurred in Athens and North Evia at this time. TROPOMI captures these fire episodes at a long distance away from the city center of Thessaloniki, around 35–50 km (Figure 3b).
The relative mean biases of TROPOMI XCH4 and XCO against FTIR measurements were calculated and are presented in Table 1 together with total averaged values of S-5P products.
Good agreement was found between the Thessaloniki COCCON site and respective measurements of other FTIR stations at mid latitudes, such as those of NDACC in Bremen, Karlsruhe, Zugspitze or Garmisch. For methane, Bremen’s relative mean bias (for a bias-corrected product) is 0.12 ± 1.5%, where as the Zugspitze and Garmisch biases reach −0.22 ± 1.07%, and −0.01 ± 0.83%, respectively [6]. An annual increase, though small, is observed for methane concentrations for all sites. The mean relative bias in the case of XCO for the NDACC stations in mid-latitude areas is found to fall well within the mission requirements, with a good agreement with our site. In particular, the de-striped mean relative bias of Bremen, Zugspitze and Garmisch is 0.84 ± 5.64%, −0.32 ± 7.74% and 6.42 ± 9.09%, respectively. It should be noted that the bias of NDACC vs. S5P comparison uses a wider time collocation window of 3 h (vs. 1 h in this work).

4. Conclusions

The TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) captures the temporal XCH4 variability, both the seasonal cycle and the summer increase. Both datasets report a slight annual increase, and the total averaged values of TROPOMI and FTIR measurements are 1.878 ± 0.018 ppm and 1.879 ± 0.015 ppm, respectively. The bias-corrected product (albedo correction) provided by the new algorithm [6] improves the correlation between the satellite and the ground-based FTIR instrument (Figure 2a). We observe the lowest bias (September 2020) in long-distant orbits far from the location of Thessaloniki’s FTIR station, around 75–80 km (Figure 3a).
Regarding XCO column observations, both ground-based and satellite measurements capture the short-scale carbon monoxide temporal variations. Higher XCO is observed for spring and winter (attributed to incomplete fossil fuel combustion and industry), while the highest values of FTIR measurements, representing the fire episodes during summer 2021 in Greece (fire episodes in a suburban forest area in Thessaloniki and air mass transport from Athens and North Evia), are also captured by TROPOMI observations with values over 0.135 ppm. The total averaged values of TROPOMI and FTIR measurements are 0.093 ± 0.01 ppm and 0.092 ± 0.008 ppm, respectively. The new algorithm improves the bias between the satellite and the FTIR spectrometer, and we observe a small decrease between the relative bias and the distance in the case of XCO (Figure 3b).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.B.; Investigation, M.M. and C.T.; Methodology, M.M., C.T., D.B. and M.-E.K.; Resources, M.-E.K., D.D., T.B. and A.L.; Software, M.M., C.T., F.H. and D.D.; Formal analysis, M.M., C.T. and M.-E.K.; Data curation, M.M.; Supervision, D.B. and F.H.; Writing—original draft, M.M. and C.T.; Writing—review and editing, C.T., D.B., M.-E.K., F.H., D.D., T.B. and A.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was co-financed by the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT—“The Research University in the Helmholtz Association”), by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) and by Greek national funds through the Operational Program “Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation” (NSRF 2014–2020) by the “PANhellenic Infrastructure for Atmospheric Composition and Climate Change” project (MIS 5021516), implemented under the Action “Reinforcement of the Research and Innovation” Infrastructure.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The EM27/SUN FTIR spectrometer data from Thessaloniki, Greece, are available upon request ([email protected] and [email protected]). The S5P/TROPOMI observations are publicly available from the Copernicus Open Access Hub (https://scihub.copernicus.eu/, ESA, 2021, accessed on 22 March 2023).

Acknowledgments

We wholeheartedly acknowledge the support provided by the IT Center of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTh) throughout the progress of this research work and the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) for the collaboration and support. We acknowledge funding from the Helmholtz Association in the framework of MOSES (Modular Observation Solutions for Earth Systems). This research has been supported by the European Space Agency (COCCON-PROCEEDS, grant no. 4000121212/17/I-EF; and QA4EOQA4EO, grant no. 4000128426/19/NL/FF/ab). The National Network on Climate Change and its Impacts—CLIMPACT, funded by the Public Investment Program of Greece, is also acknowledged for this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mermigkas, M.; Topaloglou, C.; Balis, D.; Koukouli, M.E.; Hase, F.; Dubravica, D.; Borsdorff, T.; Lorente, A. FTIR Measurements of Greenhouse Gases over Thessaloniki, Greece in the Framework of COCCON and Comparison with S5P/TROPOMI Observations. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Farahani, E., Kadner, S., Seyboth, K., Adler, A., Baum, I., Brunner, S., Eickemeier, P., et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dlugokencky, E.J.; Nisbet, E.G.; Fisher, R.; Lowry, D. Global atmospheric methane: Budget, changes and dangers. Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2011, 369, 2058–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hase, F.; Frey, M.; Blumenstock, T.; Gros, J.M.; Kiel, M.; Kohlhepp, R.; Tsidu, G.M.; Schafer, K.V.R.; Sha, M.K.; Orphal, J. Application of portable FTIR spectrometers for detecting greenhouse gas emissions of the major city Berlin. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2015, 8, 3059–3068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wunch, D.; Toon, G.C.; Blavier, J.-F.L.; Washenfelder, R.A.; Notholt, J.; Connor, B.J.; Griffith, D.W.T.; Sherlock, V.; Wennberg, P.O. The total carbon column observing network. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2011, 369, 2087–2112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lambert, J.-C.; Compernolle, S.; Eichmann, K.-U.; de Graaf, M.; Hubert, D.; Keppens, A.; Kleipool, Q.; Langerock, B.; Sha, M.K.; Verhoelst, T.; et al. (Eds.) Quarterly Validation Report of the Copernicus Sentinel-5 Precursor Operational Data Products #06: April 2018–February 2020. In ESA MPC S5P MPC. Routine Operations Consolidated Validation Report; S5P MPC Routine Operations Consolidated Validation Report Series; Issue #06, Version 06.0.1; Tropomi: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2020; p. 154. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lorente, A.; Borsdorff, T.; Butz, A.; Hasekamp, O.; De Brugh, J.A.; Schneider, A.; Wu, L.; Hase, F.; Kivi, R.; Wunch, D.; et al. Methane retrieved from TROPOMI: Improvement of the data product and validation of the first 2 years of measurements. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2021, 14, 665–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Knapp, M.; Kleinschek, R.; Hase, F.; Agustí-Panareda, A.; Inness, A.; Barré, J.; Landgraf, J.; Borsdorff, T.; Kinne, S.; Butz, A. Shipborne measurements of XCO2, XCH4, and XCO above the Pacific Ocean and comparison to CAMS atmospheric analyses and S5P/TROPOMI. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2021, 13, 199–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Borsdorff, T.; De Brugh, J.A.; Pandey, S.; Hasekamp, O.; Aben, I.; Houweling, S.; Landgraf, J. Carbon monoxide air pollution on sub-city scales and along arterial roads detected by the Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2019, 19, 3579–3588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sha, M.K.; Langerock, B.; Blavier, J.-F.L.; Blumenstock, T.; Borsdorff, T.; Buschmann, M.; Dehn, A.; De Mazière, M.; Deutscher, N.M.; Feist, D.G.; et al. Validation of methane and carbon monoxide from sentinel-5 precursor using TCCON and NDACC-IRWG stations. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2021, 14, 6249–6304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Daily mean of dry-air column mixing ratios measured by TROPOMI (dark red) and FTIR (blue) under clear-sky and cloudy atmospheric conditions, with associated spatiotemporal standard deviation. (a) XCH4, (b) XCO.
Figure 1. Daily mean of dry-air column mixing ratios measured by TROPOMI (dark red) and FTIR (blue) under clear-sky and cloudy atmospheric conditions, with associated spatiotemporal standard deviation. (a) XCH4, (b) XCO.
Environsciproc 26 00188 g001
Figure 2. Relative mean bias of collocated TROPOMI column-averaged dry-air mole fractions of methane (XCH4) and carbon monoxide (XCO) compared to EM27 FTIR ground measurements in Thessaloniki from January 2019 until June 2022. Both standard products and corrected products are shown in the above figures. (a) XCH4, (b) XCO.
Figure 2. Relative mean bias of collocated TROPOMI column-averaged dry-air mole fractions of methane (XCH4) and carbon monoxide (XCO) compared to EM27 FTIR ground measurements in Thessaloniki from January 2019 until June 2022. Both standard products and corrected products are shown in the above figures. (a) XCH4, (b) XCO.
Environsciproc 26 00188 g002
Figure 3. Relative mean bias vs. distance of collocated TROPOMI column-averaged dry-air mole fractions of methane (XCH4) and carbon monoxide (XCO) compared to EM27 FTIR ground measurements in Thessaloniki from January 2019 until June 2022. The color bar indicates the date–time index in both figures. (a) XCH4, (b) XCO.
Figure 3. Relative mean bias vs. distance of collocated TROPOMI column-averaged dry-air mole fractions of methane (XCH4) and carbon monoxide (XCO) compared to EM27 FTIR ground measurements in Thessaloniki from January 2019 until June 2022. The color bar indicates the date–time index in both figures. (a) XCH4, (b) XCO.
Environsciproc 26 00188 g003
Table 1. Relative mean biases of TROPOMI XCH4 and XCO against FTIR measurements and total mean values of S-5P products.
Table 1. Relative mean biases of TROPOMI XCH4 and XCO against FTIR measurements and total mean values of S-5P products.
X-GasRelative Mean Bias (%)S-5P Mean (ppm)
XCH4−0.01 ± 0.61.87 ± 0.01
XCO+0.62 ± 4.20.09 ± 0.01
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mermigkas, M.; Topaloglou, C.; Koukouli, M.-E.; Balis, D.; Hase, F.; Dubravica, D.; Borsdorff, T.; Lorente, A. Sentinel-5P/TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument CH4 and CO Total Column Validation over the Thessaloniki Collaborative Carbon Column Observing Network Site, Greece. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2023, 26, 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2023026188

AMA Style

Mermigkas M, Topaloglou C, Koukouli M-E, Balis D, Hase F, Dubravica D, Borsdorff T, Lorente A. Sentinel-5P/TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument CH4 and CO Total Column Validation over the Thessaloniki Collaborative Carbon Column Observing Network Site, Greece. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2023; 26(1):188. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2023026188

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mermigkas, Marios, Chrysanthi Topaloglou, Maria-Elissavet Koukouli, Dimitrios Balis, Frank Hase, Darko Dubravica, Tobias Borsdorff, and Alba Lorente. 2023. "Sentinel-5P/TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument CH4 and CO Total Column Validation over the Thessaloniki Collaborative Carbon Column Observing Network Site, Greece" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 26, no. 1: 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2023026188

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop