Statement of Peer Review †
by
, , , ,
Qamar Zaman
1,2,*, 
Muhammad Jehanzeb Masud Cheema
2,3, 
Muhammad Naveed Tahir
4,5,
Shoaib Rashid Saleem
2,6
,
Tahir Iqbal
2,4
,
Saddam Hussain
3,7,8,
Muhammad Umair
2 and
Muhammad Naveed Anjum
2,4 1
PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan
2
Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan
3
National Center of Industrial Biotechnology, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan
4
Data-Driven Smart Decision Platform, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan
5
Department of Agronomy, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan
6
Center for Precision Agriculture, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan
7
Department of Irrigation and Drainage, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad 36000, Pakistan
8
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California Davis (UC Davis), Davis, CA 95616, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Presented at the International Precision Agriculture Pakistan Conference 2022 (PAPC 2022)—Change the Culture of Agriculture, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, 22–24 September 2022.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 23(1), 41; https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022023041
Published: 6 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 1st International Precision Agriculture Pakistan Conference 2022 (PAPC 2022)—Change the Culture of Agriculture)
In submitting conference proceedings to Environment Sciences Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal.
- Type of peer review: double-blind
- Conference submission management system: https://papc.pk/
- Number of submissions sent for review: 57
- Number of submissions accepted: 40
- Acceptance rate: 70%
- Average number of reviews per paper: 2
- Total number of reviewers involved: 38
- Any additional information on the review process: N/A
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Zaman, Q.; Cheema, M.J.M.; Tahir, M.N.; Saleem, S.R.; Iqbal, T.; Hussain, S.; Umair, M.; Anjum, M.N. Statement of Peer Review. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2022, 23, 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022023041
AMA Style
Zaman Q, Cheema MJM, Tahir MN, Saleem SR, Iqbal T, Hussain S, Umair M, Anjum MN. Statement of Peer Review. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2022; 23(1):41. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022023041
Chicago/Turabian StyleZaman, Qamar, Muhammad Jehanzeb Masud Cheema, Muhammad Naveed Tahir, Shoaib Rashid Saleem, Tahir Iqbal, Saddam Hussain, Muhammad Umair, and Muhammad Naveed Anjum. 2022. "Statement of Peer Review" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 23, no. 1: 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022023041
