Next Article in Journal
Nucleation Activity of Graphene in Polyamide 6-Based Nanocomposites Prepared by In Situ Polymerization
Previous Article in Journal
Polymeric Blends with Copper: A Powerful Weapon against Pathogenic Spread
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

3D Printing for Affinity Chromatographic Support Production †

1
CDRSP-IPL—Centre for Rapid and Sustainable Product Development, Polytechnic of Leiria, Leiria, Rua de Portugal, 2430-028 Marinha Grande, Portugal
2
CICS-UBI—Health Science Research Centre, University of Beira Interior, Av. Infante D. Henrique, 6200-506 Covilhã, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the Materiais 2022, Marinha Grande, Portugal, 10–13 April 2022.
Mater. Proc. 2022, 8(1), 82; https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2022008082
Published: 8 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of MATERIAIS 2022)
The development and growth of biopharmaceutical therapies lead to a demand for efficient chromatographic methods to purify desired biomolecules (e.g., nucleic acids, enzymes or monoclonal antibodies) which are presently under consideration or approved by the Food and Drug Administration. These molecules have distinct chemical and size properties which are critical cues for the development and production of chromatographic supports. The most common chromatographic supports are based on micro-particulate materials that have a randomly compacted configuration. Also, in the case of monolithic supports, it is not possible to fully control its internal structure [1,2].
Accordingly, this slightly different internal morphology and porous structure presented leads to be difficult to predict their chromatographic behaviour which requires careful testing and validation of the quality of the packed chromatographic supports before use. Moreover, bed consolidation is typically evaluated by empirical characterization methods. For these reasons, column packing is often treated as an inexact science, whilst the limited scope to control morphology and porosity with traditionally made monolithic materials can result in low levels of column-to-column reproducibility and often the need arises to individually prepare and validate each monolithic column [3].
Meanwhile, 3D printing technology is starting to be used in this field since it could provide full control of the geometry of the produced pieces. Therefore, on the chromatographic field, this technology allows a more defined and uniform convective flow path than the randomly interconnected pores observed on the conventional chromatographic support [4]. This is an extraordinary improvement since it will allow modulating the flow, the pressure and consequently the path of the molecules within the chromatographic support.
Although the aforementioned, 3DP methodologies per si will not lead to high-quality pharmaceutical products being needed the association with affinity ligands, such as amino acids to enable reaching high purity yields of the desired molecules. Beyond the most studied amino acids as chromatographic ligands, arginine has been successfully immobilized on different chromatographic supports (namely agarose bead matrices, macroporous matrices and monoliths) to achieve extra pure gene therapy products [5,6].
Regarding all the above mentioned, in this work, it was studied the immobilization of arginine on 3DP chromatographic supports.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.S. and J.F.A.V.; methodology F.S. and J.F.A.V.; validation, F.S., J.R.D. and J.F.A.V.; formal analysis, F.S., J.R.D. and J.F.A.V.; investigation, J.F.A.V.; resources; writing—original draft preparation, J.F.A.V.; writing—review and editing, J.F.A.V. and F.S.; supervision, N.A. and F.S.; funding acquisition, N.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) and Centro2020 through the following Projects: UIDB/04044/2020, UIDP/04044/2020, UIDB/00709/2020, PAMI-ROTEIRO/0328/2013 (Nº 022158), MATIS (CEN-TRO-01-0145-FEDER-000014).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Valente, J.F.A.; Pereira, P.; Sousa, A.; Queiroz, J.A.; Sousa, F. Effect of plasmid DNA size on chitosan or polyethyleneimine polyplexes formulation. Polymers 2021, 13, 793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Valente, J.F.A.; Sousa, A.; Queiroz, J.A.; Sousa, F. DoE to improve supercoiled p53-pDNA purification by O-phospho-l-tyrosine chromatography. J. Chromatogr. B 2019, 1105, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hearn, M.T. Trends in additive manufacturing of chromatographic and membrane materials. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2017, 18, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Valente, J.F.A.; Sousa, F.; Alves, N. Additive Manufacturing Tools to Improve the Performance of Chromatographic Approaches. Trends Biotechnol. 2021, 39, 970–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Valente, J.F.A.; Sousa, A.; Azevedo, G.A.; Queiroz, J.A.; Sousa, F. Purification of supercoiled p53-encoding plasmid using an arginine-modified macroporous support. J. Chromatogr. A 2020, 1618, 460890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Azevedo, G.M.; Valente, J.F.A.; Sousa, A.; Pedro, A.Q.; Pereira, P.; Sousa, F.; Queiroz, J.A. Effect of chromatographic conditions on supercoiled plasmid DNA stability and bioactivity. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 5170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Valente, J.F.A.; Dias, J.R.; Sousa, F.; Alves, N. 3D Printing for Affinity Chromatographic Support Production. Mater. Proc. 2022, 8, 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2022008082

AMA Style

Valente JFA, Dias JR, Sousa F, Alves N. 3D Printing for Affinity Chromatographic Support Production. Materials Proceedings. 2022; 8(1):82. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2022008082

Chicago/Turabian Style

Valente, Joana F. A., Juliana R. Dias, Fani Sousa, and Nuno Alves. 2022. "3D Printing for Affinity Chromatographic Support Production" Materials Proceedings 8, no. 1: 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2022008082

APA Style

Valente, J. F. A., Dias, J. R., Sousa, F., & Alves, N. (2022). 3D Printing for Affinity Chromatographic Support Production. Materials Proceedings, 8(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2022008082

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop