It is well-known that the electrical properties of the Ca3Co4O9 thermoelectric (TE) compound are strongly influenced by the valence of the substituting cation, while its solubility and “functional” impact depend largely on the preparation and/or processing methods used. Furthermore, this material’s hybrid crystal structure allows for different cation substitutions in/from different sublattices. This research work presents the relevant effects of different La substitutions for the Ca ions from the insulating rock salt type [Ca2CoO3] crystal component (considered as a “charge reservoir” for the conductive [CoO2] layers) for a series of bulk samples prepared and processed via a solid-state method, chosen for simplicity. The results show that the actual level of La substitutions does not exceed 0.03 (x < 0.03), in Ca3-xLaxCo4O9 samples with x = 0.01, 0.03, 0.05 and 0.07, and that beyond this limit, simultaneous Ca3Co4O9 phase decomposition and secondary Ca3Co2O6 and (La,Ca)CoO3 phase formation take place. The morpho-structural features were found to be quite moderate, with a negligible effect on the charge carries transport. The electrical measurements and average oxidation state of cobalt (~3.11) suggest that the substitutions with La have only a minor effect on the charge carrier concentration. The electrical resistivity of the samples with x = 0.01, 0.03 and 0.05 is found to be ~1.3 times lower than of pristine Ca3Co4O9, while the changes in the Seebeck coefficient values are only moderate in the whole measured temperature range. The highest power factor, representing the electrical counterpart of the TE performance, was found for the Ca2.99La0.01Co4O9 samples (~0.28 mW/K2m, at 800 °C), being among the best found in the literature for similar materials. Our results suggest that low substitutions with rare-earth cations in the “charge reservoir” layers of the Ca3Co4O9 compound can be promising in designing and improving these p-type oxides, provided by the strongly correlated nature of their conduction mechanism.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, G.C. and A.V.K.; methodology, G.C., D.V.L. and A.V.K.; software, G.C.; validation, G.C., P.A., D.V.L. and M.A.V.; formal analysis, G.C., D.V.L. and A.V.K.; investigation, G.C., D.V.L., P.A., M.A.V. and A.V.K.; resources, G.C. and A.V.K.; data curation, G.C. and D.V.L.; writing—original draft preparation, G.C.; writing—review and editing, G.C., D.V.L., P.A., M.A.V. and A.V.K.; visualization, G.C., D.V.L., P.A., M.A.V. and A.V.K.; supervision, A.V.K.; project administration, G.C. and A.V.K.; funding acquisition, G.C. and A.V.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme. This research was funded by the European Comision (H2020-EU.4. Programme; MSCA-IF-EF-ST-Standard EF Funding Scheme), grant number 101003375, and The APC was funded by the Materials 2022 Conference.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not available.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
| Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
, 
