Next Article in Journal
Preface of the International Symposium on Nanotechnology for Medicine, Environment and Energy
Previous Article in Journal
Metal Oxide Nanomaterials for Energy Density Improvement in Lithium-Ion and Solid-State Batteries
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Single-Source Facile Synthesis of Phase-Pure Na+- and Sr2+-Modified Bismuth Titanate—Structural, Optical, and Electrical Properties for Energy Storage Application †

by
Anitha Gnanasekar
,
Pavithra Gurusamy
and
Geetha Deivasigamani
*
Department of Applied Sciences and Humanities, Madras Institute of Technology, Anna University, Chennai 600044, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 5th International Online Conference on Nanomaterials, 22–24 September 2025; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/IOCN2025.
Mater. Proc. 2025, 25(1), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2025025018
Published: 7 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 5th International Online Conference on Nanomaterials)

Abstract

In this present study, sodium- and strontium-modified bismuth titanate—Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3 (BNT) and Bi0.5Sr0.5TiO3 (BST)—were synthesized using the auto-combustion technique with citric acid (C6H8O7) and glycine (C2H5NO2) as fuels in an optimized ratio of 1.5:1. The resulting powders were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy, UV–Visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), and Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. The electrical behavior of the samples was studied using an LCR meter. XRD analysis confirmed the formation of a single-phase perovskite structure with average crystallite sizes of 18.60 nm for BNT and 22.03 nm for BST, attributed to the difference in ionic radii between Na+ and Sr2+. An increase in crystallite size was accompanied by a corresponding increase in lattice parameters and unit-cell volume. The Williamson–Hall analysis further validated the strain-size contributions. EDX (Energy-Dispersive X-ray analysis) results confirmed successful incorporation of Na+ and Sr2+ without detectable impurity phases. Optical studies revealed distinct absorption peaks at 341 nm for BNT and 374 nm for BST, and the optical bandgap (Eg), calculated using Tauc’s relation, was found to be 2.6 eV and 2.0 eV, respectively. FT-IR spectra exhibited characteristic Ti-O vibrational bands in the range of 420–720 cm−1, consistent with the perovskite structure. For electrical characterization, the powders were pelletized under 3-ton pressure and sintered at 1000 °C for 3 h. The dielectric constant (εr), dielectric loss (tan δ), and ac conductivity (σ) of both samples increased with frequency. The combined structural, optical, and electrical results indicate that the optimized compositions of BNT and BST possess properties suitable for use in capacitors and other energy-storage applications.

1. Introduction

Modern researchers focus on perovskite-structured (ABO3) oxide ceramics due to their optical behavior and various electrical properties, including dielectric, ferroelectric, piezoelectric, and pyroelectric nature. Because of this, they play a vital role as actuators, capacitors, transducers, long-term FeRAM and batteries, and so on [1]. Bismuth sodium titanate (Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3) and bismuth strontium titanate (Bi0.5Sr0.5TiO3) stand as excellent lead-free oxide-based perovskite ceramics because of their elevated Curie temperature, intense remanent polarization, and good thermal stability [1,2]. These ceramics are prepared by various methods like traditional solid-state method, hydrothermal method, sol–gel auto-combustion technique, and microwave method [3].
In general, BNT ceramics are a good dielectric material due to their high permittivity and low dissipation energy. Earlier study with BNT showed a high dielectric permittivity of ε = 3871, with a tan loss of δ = 0.995 at 100 Hz near the Curie temperature. While the DC conductivity was in accordance with Mott’s variable range hopping (VRH) mechanism, the AC conductivity mirrored Jonscher’s power and double power law behavior, demonstrating non-Debye type relaxation in the electrical response [1]. Similar studies on Sr1−xBixTiO3 ceramics discovered that the dielectric constant expanded from 1025 to 2320 at ambient temperature, implying a substantial enhancement in dielectric characteristics with increasing Bi content. The frequency-dependent dielectric response was explained using the correlated barrier hopping (CBH) model, supported by a reduction in activation energy with higher Bi substitution [4].
In this study, pristine BNT and BNT ceramics are prepared via the auto-combustion technique. The powder samples are calcinated at 950 °C for 5 h. The structural properties are studied using X-ray diffraction (XRD), while the elemental composition of the powders is determined using energy-dispersive X-ray spectra (EDX). The functional groups and the optical behaviors are studied using Fourier-transform IR Spectra (FT-IR) and UV–Visible DRS. An LCR meter is adopted to examine the electrical properties of the samples.

2. Experimental Techniques

The perovskite ceramics were prepared via the auto-combustion technique. Bi(NO3)3, C12H36O4Ti, NaNO3, C2H5NO2, C6H8O7, and HNO3 were the chosen precursors for the preparation of BNT. The stoichiometry amount of these starting materials was employed without additional purification. The ratio of citric acid to nitric acid and glycine was fixed to be 1.5:1:1. The incorporation of nitric acid stabilizes and inhibits the formation of precipitates in the solution. The schematic diagram illustrated in Figure 1 shows the step-by-step preparation process of BNT. A similar method is followed for the synthesis of BST.
The structural behavior of the samples calcinated at 950 °C was characterized using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD) (PANalytical X’Pert, Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK). Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) (D-12489, BRUKER Nano GmbH, Berlin, Germany) was employed to find the elemental composition, while the functional groups were studied by utilizing Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) (FT/IR-4700, Jasco, Tokyo, Japan). The energy bandgap of BNT and BST was calculated from the absorbance spectra obtained via UV–Visible DRS (LAMBDA-35, Perkin Elmer, Shelton, WA, USA). The electrical properties (dielectric permittivity, tangent loss, and ac conductivity) were measured using an LCR meter.

3. Results and Discussion

The XRD patterns of the fabricated BNT and BST samples are depicted in Figure 2a. The perovskite structure of the samples is confirmed without any trace of impurities. This proves that Na+ and Sr2+ ions have completely diffused into the bismuth titanate matrix crystal lattice. The significant diffraction profiles indicate the excellent crystallinity of the prepared samples. No additional peaks were detected apart from the (111) and (200) reflections, indicating that the synthesized samples possess a pseudo cubic structure [5]. The most intense peak (110) of BNT inclines towards the higher angles when compared to BST, where this shift can be due to the smaller ionic radii of Na (1.02 Å in six co-ordination), while Sr is 1.18 Å in six co-ordination. In addition, the microstructural features of BNT and BST are systematically estimated through the Williamson–Hall plot, incorporating both crystallite size and lattice strain contributions. Figure 2b shows the plot displaying a positive slope, which supports the lattice extension and a shift in lattice parameters along a particular crystallographic direction. The average crystallite size (D) was calculated by adopting Debye Scherrer’s formula, and it was found that BST has a larger crystallite size than BNT. Also, other parameters, including the lattice constant (A), volume of the unit cell (V), micro strain (ε), dislocation density (δ), and packing factor (P) values, are calculated, and the results are tabulated in Table 1.
Figure 3 displays the elemental composition of BNT and BST, characterized using Electron dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). From the results, it is clear that only desired elements are present in the prepared samples, where only Bi, Na, Ti, and O were found in BNT, while Bi, Sr, Ti, and O were discovered in BST. The atomic percentage and the weight percentage of the samples are shown in Figure 3, which emerged to be extremely close to the anticipated stoichiometric values.
From the FT-IR spectra, the functional groups present in the prepared ceramics are determined. Figure 4 displays a graph plotted between wavelength (ranging from 500 to 4000 cm−1) and transmittance. The broad absorption bands observed at 555.59 and 575.65 cm−1 can be ascribed to Ti–O stretching vibrations [1]. In BNT, the small absorption band located in the 851.41 cm−1 region arises from the fundamental stretching vibrations of the Sr-O linkage, while the one located at 1382.71 cm−1 indicates the existence of the Ba-O-Ti bond [2,3]. The minor vibrational bonds interpreted around 1700 cm−1 correspond to the C=O stretching vibrations [2].
Figure 5 shows the UV–Visible absorbance spectra of BNT and BST ceramic perovskite samples in the wavelength range between 200 and 800 nm. A single absorbance peak has been obtained for both the ceramics, with BNT having its peak at 341 nm, while BST at 374 nm. Also, by adopting Tauc’s formula, the bandgap energy (Eg) of the samples is determined to be 2.0 eV and 2.6 eV for BNT and BST [6].
αhυ = A (hυ − Eg)n
These values are also in accordance with the previous reports [7]. The measured bandgap value further confirms the semiconducting nature. Although BNT shows a tail up to ~800 nm and BST up to ~700 nm, the Tauc-derived bandgaps represent the true intrinsic electronic transitions. The difference in the absorption edge arises mainly from the different defect structures in the two materials. Pristine bismuth titanate shows a bandgap of 2.2–2.7 eV. Compared to this, BNT shows a longer absorption tail toward ~800 nm, where the substitution of Na+ slightly widens the bandgap to 2.6 eV by altering the Bi-O-Ti electronic structure. On the other hand, in BST, Sr2+ substitution reduces the bandgap to 2.0 eV due to increased lattice distortion and defect-induced mid-gap states [7]. The bandgap graph plotted between photon energy and (αhυ)2 is illustrated in Figure 5c,d.
Figure 6 shows the room temperature dielectric permittivity measured in the frequency range from 4 Hz to 8 MHz. The real part of the dielectric permittivity signifies the energy storage capacity of the material [6].
εr = Cp/C0
C0 = ε0A/d
Here, ‘Cp’ represents the capacitance, and ‘A’ and ‘d’ are the cross-sectional area and thickness of the prepared pellet samples. Both samples exhibited a very high dielectric permittivity at lower frequencies initially, while a sudden decline in the value was measured around 104 Hz. At low frequencies, space charge has enough time to follow the electric field at the grain boundaries. However, as frequency rises, their ability to respond diminishes, where the space charge no longer contributes and only the material’s intrinsic properties remain dominant. A Debye-like relaxing characteristic is implied by the unexpected decrease in reaction at this stage [8]. This indicates that all space charges were able to relax, and space charge-induced polarization ceased to contribute beyond 104 Hz. Thus, at higher frequency, BST obtained a higher εr = 3946 than BNT εr = 2420.
Also, tangent loss is determined, and it is found that both the samples, BST and BNT, showed a significant loss of δ = 2.94 and δ = 1.04. The loss factor was measured by adopting the following equation:
ε″ = ε′ Tanδ
Figure 6b,c shows the plot drawn between tangent loss and frequency of BNT and BST. From the figure, it is clear that the loss decreases at higher frequencies and increases at lower frequencies. This change can be attributed to the sample’s structural defect [9]. Additionally, ac conductivity (σ) as a function of frequency is displayed in Figure 7. There are two different regions on the AC conductivity curve. At low frequencies, a plateau is observed, representing DC conductivity, where the field has minimal influence on the jump conduction process, likely due to electrode or surface effects. At higher frequencies, conductivity gradually increases, indicating the onset of hopping conduction. This behavior is associated with charge carrier movement between localized states and reflects the contributions from grains and grain boundaries [1].

4. Conclusions

BNT and BST ceramics were successfully prepared via the auto-combustion technique. The pseudo cubic phase was confirmed by the XRD patterns, while the average crystallite size of BNT and BST was found to be 18.60 nm and 22.03 nm. From the EDX analysis, it is proven that the prepared samples have no impurities present. From the optical properties studied via UV–Visible DRS, the energy bandgap was determined to be 2.6 eV for BNT and 2.00 eV for BST. The sample BST delivered a high dielectric permittivity of εr = 3946 that BNT (εr = 2420), while a minimal tangent loss factor δ = 2.94 and δ = 1.04 was obtained for both the samples. Also, room temperature ac conductivity was measured, displaying two different behaviors corresponding to their frequency. Given their high dielectric constant, low loss factor, and moderate bandgap, the synthesized BNT and BST ceramics show promising potential for applications in capacitors, dielectric resonators, and electro-optic devices, and in piezoelectric sensors and energy harvesting systems.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, and Validation, A.G., P.G. and G.D.; Formal Analysis, and Investigation, A.G. and G.D.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, Writing—Review and Editing, A.G. and P.G.; Visualization, G.D.; Supervision, G.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge J. Ramajothi, Department of Applied Sciences and Humanities, Anna University, Chennai, for providing access to the LCR meter facility for dielectric measurements.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rhimi, N.; Dhahri, N.; Khelifi, M.; Hlil, E.K.; Dhahri, J. Structural, morphological, optical and dielectric properties of sodium bismuth titanate ceramics. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2022, 146, 110119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kelele, K.G.; Murthy, H.C.A.; Balachandran, R.; Tadesse, A.; Nikodimos, Y.; Tufa, L.T.; Lee, J. Synthesis and characterization of Mo-doped barium strontium titanate nanopowder via slow injection sol–gel processing. Chem. Pap. 2023, 77, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Karthikeyan, S.; Thirunavukkarasu, P.; Surendhiran, S.; Balamurugan, A.; Syed Khadar, Y.A.; Shanmugasundaram, K. Facile synthesis of barium strontium titanate: Effects of processing parameters on optical and electrical properties. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 47, 964–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ibrahim, K.E.; Kassim, H.A. Improving the Structural, Dielectric, and Electrical Conductivity Properties of Bismuth-Doped Strontium Titanate Via Microwave Synthesis Technology. Ceram.-Silik. 2024, 68, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, N.; Fan, Y.; Jia, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, Z.; Liao, Z.; Dong, P.; Zhang, R.; Lin, Z.; Ji, Z.; et al. Enhanced energy-storage properties in bismuth sodium titanate-strontium titanate ceramics by doping calcium zirconate linear perovskite. Ceram. Int. 2025, 51, 33155–33165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Anitha, G.; Pavithra, G.; Geetha, D. Tailoring ZnAl2O4 properties through divalent metal ions (Cu2+, Mg2+, & Mn2+) incorporation: A study on dielectric and photocatalytic enhancement. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2025, 36, 1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Roy, R.; Dutta, A. Structural, optical, electrical, and dielectric relaxation properties of rare earth containing sodium bismuth titanate Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 perovskite: Effect of ionic radius. J. Rare Earths 2024, 42, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bhargavi, G.N.; Badapanda, T.; Anwar, M.S.; Tlija, M.; Joardar, H.; Tripathy, S.N. Understanding the impact of gadolinium substitution on the impedance and conduction mechanism of barium zirconium titanate ceramics. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2024, 35, 1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gnanasekar, A.; Gurusamy, P.; Deivasigamani, G. Investigation of Structural, Optical, and Frequency-Dependent Dielectric Properties of Barium Zirconate (BaZrO3) Ceramic Prepared via Wet Chemical Auto-Combustion Technique. Eng. Proc. 2025, 87, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of synthesis steps.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of synthesis steps.
Materproc 25 00018 g001
Figure 2. (a) XRD profiles of BNT and BST and (b) Linear fit of the samples.
Figure 2. (a) XRD profiles of BNT and BST and (b) Linear fit of the samples.
Materproc 25 00018 g002
Figure 3. EDX spectra and weight % of (a) BNT and (b) BST.
Figure 3. EDX spectra and weight % of (a) BNT and (b) BST.
Materproc 25 00018 g003
Figure 4. FT–IR Spectra of BNT and BST ceramics.
Figure 4. FT–IR Spectra of BNT and BST ceramics.
Materproc 25 00018 g004
Figure 5. (a,b) Absorbance spectra and (c,d) energy bandgap plot of BNT and BST.
Figure 5. (a,b) Absorbance spectra and (c,d) energy bandgap plot of BNT and BST.
Materproc 25 00018 g005
Figure 6. (a) Dielectric permittivity (εr) of BNT and BST, (b,c) Tangent loss of BNT and BST.
Figure 6. (a) Dielectric permittivity (εr) of BNT and BST, (b,c) Tangent loss of BNT and BST.
Materproc 25 00018 g006
Figure 7. AC conductivity (σ) as a function of frequency for the prepared samples.
Figure 7. AC conductivity (σ) as a function of frequency for the prepared samples.
Materproc 25 00018 g007
Table 1. Average crystallite size (D), lattice constant (A), volume of the unit cell (V), microstrain (ε), dislocation density (δ), and packing factor (P) of BNT and BST.
Table 1. Average crystallite size (D), lattice constant (A), volume of the unit cell (V), microstrain (ε), dislocation density (δ), and packing factor (P) of BNT and BST.
SamplesD
(nm)
A
(Å)
V
(Å)
ε
(103)
δ
(10−2)
P
BNT18.603.872258.051.112.889.76
BST22.033.984263.240.712.0610.19
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gnanasekar, A.; Gurusamy, P.; Deivasigamani, G. Single-Source Facile Synthesis of Phase-Pure Na+- and Sr2+-Modified Bismuth Titanate—Structural, Optical, and Electrical Properties for Energy Storage Application. Mater. Proc. 2025, 25, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2025025018

AMA Style

Gnanasekar A, Gurusamy P, Deivasigamani G. Single-Source Facile Synthesis of Phase-Pure Na+- and Sr2+-Modified Bismuth Titanate—Structural, Optical, and Electrical Properties for Energy Storage Application. Materials Proceedings. 2025; 25(1):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2025025018

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gnanasekar, Anitha, Pavithra Gurusamy, and Geetha Deivasigamani. 2025. "Single-Source Facile Synthesis of Phase-Pure Na+- and Sr2+-Modified Bismuth Titanate—Structural, Optical, and Electrical Properties for Energy Storage Application" Materials Proceedings 25, no. 1: 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2025025018

APA Style

Gnanasekar, A., Gurusamy, P., & Deivasigamani, G. (2025). Single-Source Facile Synthesis of Phase-Pure Na+- and Sr2+-Modified Bismuth Titanate—Structural, Optical, and Electrical Properties for Energy Storage Application. Materials Proceedings, 25(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/materproc2025025018

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop