Next Article in Journal
Contrast Enhancement in 2D Nanomaterial SEM Images
Previous Article in Journal
Statement of Peer Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Granulated Activated Carbon as an Efficient Adsorbent for the Removal of Organic Matter from Water †

1
Faculty of Technology Zvornik, University of East Sarajevo, Karakaj 34a, 75400 Zvornik, Bosnia and Herzegovina
2
Institute of General and Physical Chemistry, Studentski trg 12/V, 11000 Beograd, Serbia
3
Faculty of Technology, University of Novi Sad, Bulevar cara Lazara 1, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
4
Faculty of Technology, University of Tuzla, Urfeta Vejzagića 8, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the IX International Congress “Engineering, Environment and Materials in Process Industry”—EEM2025, Bijeljina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2–4 April 2025.
Eng. Proc. 2025, 99(1), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025099018
Published: 23 June 2025

Abstract

This study examined the characteristics of granulated activated carbon (GAC) as an adsorbent for the removal of organic matter from the surface water of the Jala River. The adsorbent was characterized by XRD, FTIR, Raman spectroscopy, BET and SEM/EDS methods, while a detailed physicochemical characterization was performed for the water sample. The adsorption process was carried out under the following laboratory conditions: T(water) = 25 °C, individual doses of GAC off 1, 2 and 4 g/L, stirring speed of 200 rpm and time of 60 min. The research showed that GAC has good structural and textural morphological characteristics and that it can be successfully applied to remove organic matter from water (70.53%) using the lowest dose.

1. Introduction

Adsorbents are materials that have the ability to collect molecules of other substances (adsorbates) on their surface [1]. Depending on the type of bond between the adsorbent and the adsorbate, physical and chemical adsorption are distinguished, with the former being achieved through physical interactions such as Van der Waals forces [2] and the latter through chemical bonding [3]. The phenomenon of adsorption is widely used in various applications, such as water purification [4] and air purification [5], in the chemical [6] and pharmaceutical [7] industries, in catalysis [8] and in medicine [9]. The most common adsorbents are natural minerals [10], carbon materials [11] and synthetic materials [12]. Among the key characteristics considered for the selection of an appropriate adsorbent are a high specific surface area [13] and porosity [14], selectivity [15] and regenerability [16]. Compared to synthetic adsorbents, natural ones have advantages in terms of availability, low cost and environmental friendliness [17].
Carbon-based adsorbents provide benefits such as high stability and inexpensive precursors, despite their relatively low adsorption capacity and limited selectivity [18]. Activated carbon is one of the most commonly used adsorbents [19].
The basic forms of activated carbon are granulated activated carbon (GAC) and powdered activated carbon (PAC). Both types of activated carbon have a high surface area and porosity, but their particle size differs in such a way that GAC typically ranges from 0.2 to 5 mm in diameter [20], while PAC has much finer particles, usually less than 100 μm [21].
This study examined the characteristics of granulated activated carbon (GAC) as an adsorbent for the removal of organic matter from surface water.

2. Materials and Methods

In the experimental part of this research, the following materials were used:
-
Granulated activated carbon (GAC) from coconut shell (NSF International, Germany), characterized by a developed porous structure, a satisfactory participation of micro and meso-pores and a large active surface, which provided good adsorption, chemisorption and catalytic characteristics;
-
Water samples (WS) taken from the river “Jala” in the city area of Tuzla;
-
Other chemicals and reagents of laboratory grade, which were required for the characterization of the GAC and water samples.
The following methods were used to characterize the granulated activated carbon (GAC): X-ray diffractometry (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometry (FTIR), Raman spectrophotometry, the low-temperature nitrogen adsorption method (BET) and energy dispersive scanning electron microscopy by spectrophotometry (SEM/EDS). XRD was performed on a multipurpose Rigaku Ultima IV X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) (sample in horizontal position) of a parfocal Bragg–Brentano geometry using a D/teX Ultra 250 strip detector in the 1D standard mode with a CuKα1,2 (λ = 1.54178 Á) radiation source (U = 40 kV, I = 30 mA) with the Rigaku PDXL 2.0 software being implemented (with the ICDD PDF-2 2016 database). A low background silicon sample holder was used. XRD data were collected in the angular interval 2–50° 2θ, with a step of 0.05° and a time constant of 1.5 s per step.
Examination by the FTIR method included sample preparation (spraying in agate avan) and spectroscopic imaging. The tested sample of granulated activated carbon (GAC) was recorded on a Thermo Scientific Nicolet 6700 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) infrared spectrophotometer. The range of wave numbers was 4000–500 cm−1.
The micro-Raman spectra were recorded using XploRA ONE™ (Horiba Jobin Yvon, Paris, France) Raman microscope equipped with an Nd/YAG (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) laser with an excitation wavelength (λexc) of 532 nm. The sample was placed on an X-Y motorized sample stage. The scattered light was analyzed using the spectrograph with a grating of 2400 lines/mm, with a resolution of 3 cm−1. The spectra were recorded in the wavenumber interval from 4000 to 500 cm−1.
The textural characteristics of the granulated activated carbon (GAC) were determined using an Anton Paar-NOVAtouch LX2 (Anton Paar GmbH, Graz, Austria) gas sorption analyzer with the following parameters: adsorbent nitrogen (N2) and a temperature of −195.8 °C.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed using a JEOL-JSM-6460LV (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) electron microscope (Japan) at a resolution of 3–4 nm and a 500–3000 times magnification. The samples were sputtered with gold on a BAL-TEC SCD 005 device (Bal-Tec AG, Pfäffikon, Switzerland), with a current of 30 mA, from a distance of 50 mm for 80 s. Analysis of the chemical composition of the material by EDS was performed using an energy dispersive spectrometer with a Noran System Six 200 analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) (detection of elements Z ≥ 5, detection limit of ~0.1% m/m, resolution of 126 eV).
The adsorption properties of the granular activated carbon were additionally tested in the laboratory, by performing adsorption of organic matter from the water samples of the Jala River. The physicochemical analysis of the water before the adsorption treatment included the determination of pH and electrical conductivity by potentiometric methods, the content of organic matter, iron, manganese and chloride by volumetric methods and ammoniacal nitrate and nitrite nitrogen by spectrophotometric methods.
The adsorption procedure was carried out at a temperature ≈ 25 °C, by adding determined doses of GAC (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 g/L) to glass beakers with 500 mL of sampled water, after which the suspensions were mixed using a magnetic stirrer at a specified speed (200 rpm) and time (60 min). After the adsorption treatment, the water samples were filtered on a blue filter strip, and then the content of organic matter was determined in the filtrate. The efficiency of removing organic matter from water (Eom) was calculated using the following relation:
Eom (%) = (OMb − OMa)/OMb
where OMb and OMa are the contents of organic matter in the water before and after the adsorption.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the X-ray diffractogram of the examined sample of granulated activated carbon (GAC). The diffractogram of the sample shows two broad peaks in the angular interval ~20–30° 2θ and ~40–50° 2θ, characteristic of the amorphous nature of activated carbon.
The FTIR spectrum of the activated carbon, shown in Figure 2, is characterized by a broad vibrational band in the wavenumber region from 1500 to 500 cm−1. The broad peak indicates the amorphous nature of activated carbon. This region contains bands characteristic for aromatic carbon–carbon stretching vibration (~1500 cm−1) and C-O symmetric and asymmetric stretching vibration of the -C-O-C- ring (~1150 cm−1) [22]. The sharp bands at 668 and 597 cm−1 can be assigned to the out-of-plane C-H bending mode [23]. The broad region at 600–680 cm−1 can be associated with the coupled vibrations of C-H bending in the carbon structure and physiosorbed CO2 [24,25].
The Raman spectrum of the activated carbon is shown in Figure 3. The two intense peaks at 1338 cm−1 and 1597 cm−1 are peaks characteristic for carbon structures. The peak at 1597 cm−1, denoted as the G peak, is characteristic for graphite’s structure (sp2-bonded carbon atoms in a hexagonal graphite lattice), while the peak at 1338 cm−1 is denoted as the D peak and corresponds to a disordered graphite structure (presence of lattice defects, vacancies, disordered arrangement or impurities in the material). The measured intensity ratio of the discussed peaks ID/IG is 0.92 and is used to estimate disorder in the structure. A higher ID/IG ratio indicates greater disorder, while a lower ratio shows a higher ordering of a graphitic carbon structure. The low-intensity bands at 2670 cm−1, 2920 cm−1 and 3200 cm−1 correspond to overtones 2D, D + G and 2G, respectively, originating from the disordering of the activated carbon structure [26,27].
Figure 4 shows the adsorption–desorption isotherm for a powder sample of granulated activated carbon (GAC), which is characterized by a H4 type of hysteresis loop, typical for materials with micropores in the shape of cracks and splits. The specific surface area of this sample is exceptionally high (941.6 m2/g). Taking into consideration the appearance of the obtained hysteresis, it can be suggested that the high surface area is the consequence of the micropores that are mainly present in this sample.
Figure 5 shows the distribution of the pore sizes for values < 10 nm, obtained from the desorption branch of the isotherm developed by Barret, Jouner and Halenda (BJH). According to the pore diameter distribution, the highest portion of pores is located in the micro domain (below 2 nm), with only one extremely low portion of mesopores between 3 and 5 nm. The average pore diameter is around 1 nm, and a total pore volume accounting for 0.47 cm3/g comprises the volume of pores below 10 nm, since the volume of the pores with a diameter up to 40 nm is negligible.
Figure 6 shows SEM micrographs of the tested granulated activated carbon (GAC) with different magnifications (500, 2000 and 3000 times). Visible macropores and cracks in image (a) suggest a highly porous material. In image (b), the pore walls appear more defined, and there are signs of small particles or debris, possibly related to activation or adsorption processes, while image (c) emphasizes the presence of micro- and mesopores, crucial for adsorption efficiency.
The micro-elemental (EDS) analysis (Figure 7), given in weight and atomic percentages, shows the dominant presence of carbon (C), 96.68% wt, i.e., 99.46% at, in the tested sample of granulated activated carbon (GAC).
The obtained results of the physicochemical analysis of raw water (Table 1) show slight deviations in quality parameters compared to the earlier analysis [28], but their values are still typical for urban surface waters, especially in terms of pH [29] and electrical conductivity [30].
Table 2 shows the results of adsorption of organic matter from the water with different doses of granular activated carbon, with the highest adsorption efficiency achieved at a dose of 1 g/L (70.33%), which is half the dose of GAC previously used to remove organic matter from water under the same conditions [31]. However, although the aforementioned reference work reported that the adsorption efficiency increased with increasing the adsorbent dose, in the present research, this was not the case, i.e., increasing the dose from 1 to 4 mg/L was accompanied by a decreasing trend in efficiency, from 70.53 to 33.03%. This can be explained by the accumulation of GAC particles in the water as a consequence of higher doses, which reduces the available surface area and their adsorption efficiency.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, the characterization of granulated coconut shell activated carbon was investigated using modern methods of analysis: XRD, FTIR, Raman spectrophotometry, BET and SEM/EDS. The tests using XRD and FTIR methods showed that the GAC has an amorphous structure, and the results of the BET method showed that the tested material has a large specific surface area (941.6 m2/g), which is a consequence of the presence of mostly micropores (below 2 nm) and a slightly smaller proportion of mesopores (from 3–5 nm).
The average pore diameter is about 1 nm, and the total pore volume of 0.47 cm3/g includes the pore volume below 10 nm, since the pore volume up to 40 nm in diameter is negligible. The hysteresis loop is of type H4, which is typical for materials with micropores in the form of cracks and splits. The morphological characteristics were determined by the SEM/EDS method, and from the micrographs of the GAC recorded at different magnifications, it was possible to see the forms of micropores, mesopores and cracks, which are indicative of good adsorption characteristics. Micro-elemental (EDS) analysis showed that there is a dominant proportion of carbon (96.68% wt, i.e., 99.46% at.) in the GAC sample. Under the given materials and research conditions, the optimal dosage of 1 g/L GAC for organic matter removal was determined, achieving an efficiency of 70–71%. Increasing the adsorbent dosage does not improve the adsorption efficiency and even leads to a decrease in performance. Therefore, the optimal dosage must be carefully determined to avoid unnecessary use of adsorbent while maximizing removal efficiency. Further tests should include removal of not only organic compounds but also heavy metals and other impurities in surface waters, as well as in various wastewaters.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.P. and S.B.; methodology, Z.P., D.K. and S.B.; validation, S.P. and D.K.; formal analysis, A.R., Z.P. and S.B.; investigation, M.P., S.P. and A.R.; data curation, A.R., Z.P. and S.B.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.P., A.R. and S.B.; writing—review and editing, Z.P. and S.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Aljamali, N.M.; Aldujaili, R.A.B.; Alfatlawi, I.O. Physical and chemical adsorption and its applications. Int. J. Thermodyn. Chem. Kinet. 2021, 7, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tao, J.; Rappe, A.M. Physical adsorption: Theory of van der Waals interactions between particles and clean surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 112, 106101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kulkarni, S.J. Chemisorption: A review. Int. J. Res. Rev. 2017, 4, 15–18. [Google Scholar]
  4. Singh, N.B.; Nagpal, G.; Agrawal, S.; Rachna. Water purification by using adsorbents: A review. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2018, 11, 187–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Monpezat, A.; Topin, S.; Deliere, L.; Farrusseng, D.; Coasne, B. Evaluation methods of adsorbents for air purification and gas separation at low concentration: Case studies on xenon and krypton. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 4560–4571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rathi, A.K.A.; Puranik, S.A. Chemical industry wastewater treatment using adsorption. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 2002, 61, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hubetska, T.; Kobylinska, N.; García, J.R. Efficient adsorption of pharmaceutical drugs from aqueous solution using a mesoporous activated carbon. Adsorption 2019, 26, 251–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Akinyemi, A.; Agboola, O.; Alagbe, E.; Igbokwe, E. The role of catalyst in the adsorption of dye: Homogeneous catalyst, heterogeneous catalyst, and advanced catalytic activated carbon, critical review. Desalin. Water Treat. 2024, 320, 100780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mikhalovsky, S.V.; Nikolaev, V.G. Activated carbons as medical adsorbents. Interface Sci. Technol. 2006, 7, 529–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhao, Y.; Wang, W.; Yi, H. Mineral adsorbents and characteristics. In Adsorption at Natural Minerals/Water Interfaces; Song, S., Li, B., Eds.; Engineering Materials; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gao, X.; Yang, S.; Hu, L.; Cai, S.; Wu, L.; Kawi, S. Carbonaceous materials as adsorbents for CO2 capture: Synthesis and modification. Carbon Capture Sci. Technol. 2022, 3, 100039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shaikh, T.M.A. Adsorption of Pb(II) from wastewater by natural and synthetic adsorbents. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2020, 10, 6522–6539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Iwuozor, K.O.; Ighalo, J.O.; Emenike, E.C.; Igwegbe, C.A.; Adeniyi, A.G. Do adsorbent pore size and specific surface area affect the kinetics of methyl orange aqueous phase adsorption? Chem. Lett. 2021, 2, 188–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ye, G.; Duan, X.; Zhu, K.; Zhou, X.; Coppens, M.-O.; Yuan, W. Optimizing spatial pore-size and porosity distributions of adsorbents for enhanced adsorption and desorption performance. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2015, 132, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhou, T.; Che, G.; Ding, L.; Sun, D.; Li, Y. Recent progress of selective adsorbents: From preparation to complex sample pretreatment. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 121, 115678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Renu; Sithole, T. A review on regeneration of adsorbent and recovery of metals: Adsorbent disposal and regeneration mechanism. S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 2024, 50, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gupta, V.K.; Carrott, P.J.M.; Ribeiro Carrott, M.M.L.; Suhas. Low-cost adsorbents: Growing approach to wastewater treatment—A review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 39, 783–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pardakhti, M.; Jafari, T.; Tobin, Z.; Dutta, B.; Moharreri, E.; Shemshaki, N.S.; Suib, S.; Srivastava, R. Trends in solid adsorbent materials development for CO2 capture. ACS Appl. 2019, 11, 34533–34559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Saleem, J.; Shahid, U.; Hijab, M.; Mackey, H.; McKay, G. Production and applications of activated carbons as adsorbents from olive stones. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2019, 9, 775–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zieliński, B.; Miądlicki, P.; Przepiórski, J. Development of activated carbon for removal of pesticides from water: Case study. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 20869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Świątkowski, A. Industrial carbon adsorbents. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 1999, 120, 69–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lapuente, R.; Cases, F.; Garcés, P.; Morallón, E.; Vázquez, J.L. A voltammeter and FTIR–ATR study of the electro polymerization of phenol on platinum electrodes in carbonate medium: Influence of sulfide. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1998, 451, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Al-Qodah, Z.; Shawabkah, R. Production and characterization of granular activated carbon from activated sludge. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2009, 26, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Park, S.H.; McClain, S.; Tian, Z.R.; Suib, S.L.; Karwacki, C. Surface and bulk measurements of metals deposited on activated carbon. Chem. Mat. 1997, 9, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Guo, J.; Lua, A. Textural and chemical characterizations of activated carbon prepared from oil-palm stone with H2SO4 and KOH impregnation. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 1999, 32, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ferrari, A.; Robertson, J. Raman Spectroscopy of Amorphous, Nanostructured, Diamond-Like Carbon, and Nanodiamond. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2004, 362, 2477–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Liu, J.Y.; Liu, X.; Dong, W.; Zhang, L.; Kong, Q.; Wang, W. Efficient Adsorption of Sulfamethazine onto Modified Activated Carbon: A Plausible Adsorption Mechanism. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 12437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Petrović, Z.; Mitrović, M.; Radulović, A.; Begić, S.; Blagojević, S.; Kešelj, D. Research of the efficiency of organic matter removal from water using synthetic zeolite. Technol. Acta 2024, 17, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chimezie, G.D.; Mafiana, M.O.; Dirisu, G.B.; Amodu, R. Level of pH in drinking water of an oil and gas producing community and perceived biological and health implications. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2016, 3, 53–60. [Google Scholar]
  30. Mathur, A. Conductivity: Water Quality Assessment. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 2015, 3, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  31. Begić, S.; Petrović, Z.; Mićić, V.; Salihović, F.; Tuzlak, S. Influence of adsorption parameters on removal of organic matter from natural waters. Technol. Acta 2013, 6, 21–28. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. X-ray diffractogram of granulated activated carbon (GAC).
Figure 1. X-ray diffractogram of granulated activated carbon (GAC).
Engproc 99 00018 g001
Figure 2. FTIR spectrum of granulated activated carbon (GAC).
Figure 2. FTIR spectrum of granulated activated carbon (GAC).
Engproc 99 00018 g002
Figure 3. Raman spectrum of granulated activated carbon (GAC).
Figure 3. Raman spectrum of granulated activated carbon (GAC).
Engproc 99 00018 g003
Figure 4. Adsorption–desorption isotherm of granulated activated carbon (GAC).
Figure 4. Adsorption–desorption isotherm of granulated activated carbon (GAC).
Engproc 99 00018 g004
Figure 5. BJH pore size distribution of granulated activated carbon (GAC).
Figure 5. BJH pore size distribution of granulated activated carbon (GAC).
Engproc 99 00018 g005
Figure 6. SEM micrograph of GAC with magnifications of: (a) 500; (b) 2000 and (c) 3000 times.
Figure 6. SEM micrograph of GAC with magnifications of: (a) 500; (b) 2000 and (c) 3000 times.
Engproc 99 00018 g006
Figure 7. Micro-elemental (EDS) analysis of granular activated carbon (GAC) with a magnification of 2000 times.
Figure 7. Micro-elemental (EDS) analysis of granular activated carbon (GAC) with a magnification of 2000 times.
Engproc 99 00018 g007
Table 1. Results of physicochemical characteristics of raw water (PV).
Table 1. Results of physicochemical characteristics of raw water (PV).
ParameterValue
pH7.6
Electrical conductivity (µS/cm)465
Organic matter as KMnO4 consumption (mg/L)118
Ammoniacal nitrogen (mg/L)2.28
Nitrate nitrogen (mg/L)0.42
Nitrite nitrogen (mg/L)0.102
Iron (mg/L)0.00
Manganese (mg/L)0.02
Chlorides (mg/L)41.00
Table 2. Effect of adsorbent dose on organic matter removal.
Table 2. Effect of adsorbent dose on organic matter removal.
Dose of Adsorbent (g/L)Consumption of KMnO4 (mL)Content of Organic Matter in Treated Water (mg/L)Organic Matter Removal Efficiency (%)
15.534.7770.53
28.050.5757.14
412.579.0233.03
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Petrović, Z.; Radulović, A.; Panić, S.; Begić, S.; Kešelj, D.; Petronijević, M. Granulated Activated Carbon as an Efficient Adsorbent for the Removal of Organic Matter from Water. Eng. Proc. 2025, 99, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025099018

AMA Style

Petrović Z, Radulović A, Panić S, Begić S, Kešelj D, Petronijević M. Granulated Activated Carbon as an Efficient Adsorbent for the Removal of Organic Matter from Water. Engineering Proceedings. 2025; 99(1):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025099018

Chicago/Turabian Style

Petrović, Zoran, Aleksandra Radulović, Sanja Panić, Sabina Begić, Dragana Kešelj, and Mirjana Petronijević. 2025. "Granulated Activated Carbon as an Efficient Adsorbent for the Removal of Organic Matter from Water" Engineering Proceedings 99, no. 1: 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025099018

APA Style

Petrović, Z., Radulović, A., Panić, S., Begić, S., Kešelj, D., & Petronijević, M. (2025). Granulated Activated Carbon as an Efficient Adsorbent for the Removal of Organic Matter from Water. Engineering Proceedings, 99(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025099018

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop