Next Article in Journal
Assessing Musculoskeletal Health Risks in Standing Occupations
Previous Article in Journal
Statement of Peer Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review †

1
Department of Electronic Engineering, National Formosa University, Yunlin 632, Taiwan
2
School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
3
Department of Early Childhood Development & Education, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 413, Taiwan
4
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, National University of Kaohsiung, Kaohsiung 811, Taiwan
5
Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 413, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
All proceeding papers published in this volume were presented at the 2024 4th International Conference on Social Sciences and Intelligence Management (SSIM 2024), Taichung, Taiwan, 20–22 December 2024 and the 2024 Cross Strait Conference on Social Sciences and Intelligence Management, Shanghai, China, 13–15 December 2024.
Eng. Proc. 2025, 98(1), 49; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025098049
Published: 4 September 2025
In submitting conference proceedings of the 2024 4th International Conference on Social Sciences and Intelligence Management (SSIM 2024) and the 2024 Cross Strait Conference on Social Sciences and Intelligence Management (CRSSIM 2024) to Engineering Proceedings, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal.
  • Type of peer review: 2–3 reviews by double-blind;
  • Conference submission management system: online submission system on conference homepage;
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 295;
  • Number of submissions accepted: 97;
  • Acceptance rate: 0.33;
  • Total number of reviewers involved: 60;
  • Any additional information on the review process: Please refer to Figure 1.
Figure 1. Review process.
Figure 1. Review process.
Engproc 98 00049 g001

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meen, T.-H.; Huo, J.; Lee, L.; Yang, C.-F. Statement of Peer Review. Eng. Proc. 2025, 98, 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025098049

AMA Style

Meen T-H, Huo J, Lee L, Yang C-F. Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings. 2025; 98(1):49. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025098049

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meen, Teen-Hang, Jiazhen Huo, Liza Lee, and Cheng-Fu Yang. 2025. "Statement of Peer Review" Engineering Proceedings 98, no. 1: 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025098049

APA Style

Meen, T.-H., Huo, J., Lee, L., & Yang, C.-F. (2025). Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings, 98(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025098049

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop