Next Article in Journal
Correlation Between Nutrient Concentration and Leaf Optical Attenuation Coefficient of Brassica Rapa (Pechay) as Measured by Time-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography System
Previous Article in Journal
Two-Stage Beamforming Technique for GNSS Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Internet of Things for Enhancing Public Safety, Disaster Response, and Emergency Management †

Faculty of Engineering and Quantity Surveying, INTI International University, Persiaran Perdana BBN Putra Nilai, Nilai 71800, Malaysia
Presented at the 2024 IEEE 6th Eurasia Conference on IoT, Communication and Engineering, Yunlin, Taiwan, 15–17 November 2024.
Eng. Proc. 2025, 92(1), 61; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025092061
Published: 2 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of 2024 IEEE 6th Eurasia Conference on IoT, Communication and Engineering)

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) offers transformative capabilities in enhancing public safety, disaster response, and emergency management by leveraging interconnected devices and real-time data. Through the IoT, smart sensors and networks are deployed across cities and environments to monitor critical parameters including air quality, structural integrity, and environmental changes. These systems provide early warnings for natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods, and wildfires, enabling authorities to respond proactively. In emergency management, IoT devices help coordinate resources and improve situational awareness during crises. Real-time data from wearable devices, smart infrastructure, and communication systems allow responders to track people, manage evacuations, and deploy resources more effectively. For example, IoT-enabled drones and autonomous vehicles are used to deliver supplies or assess damage in hazardous areas without risking human lives. IoT technologies improve post-disaster recovery by continuously monitoring areas for safety hazards and supporting infrastructure restoration. Smart traffic management systems assist in controlling traffic flow for emergency vehicles, while IoT-based communication networks ensure connectivity when traditional systems fail. The IoT significantly enhances the speed, accuracy, and effectiveness of disaster response and public safety operations, leading to the better protection of communities and faster recovery from emergencies.

1. Introduction

The Internet of Things (IoT) has emerged as a revolutionary technology, enabling real-time data collection and analysis that can significantly improve public safety, disaster response, and emergency management [1]. Public safety and emergency management have always been critical in urban planning and governance. The advancement of IoT technologies has paved the way for innovative solutions that enable authorities to respond more effectively to disasters and emergencies. We explore the applications of the IoT in enhancing public safety, optimizing disaster response, and improving emergency management processes.

1.1. IoT Technologies and Applications

IoT technologies enhance public safety through the use of connected sensors, smart cameras, and wearable devices, as shown in Figure 1.

1.1.1. Smart Surveillance Systems

IoT-based smart surveillance systems equipped with connected cameras are deployed to monitor public areas. These systems use AI algorithms to detect suspicious activities and alert authorities immediately. They also enhance situational awareness by providing real-time data feeds.

1.1.2. Connected Wearables for First Responders

Wearable IoT devices provide crucial health metrics for first responders, such as heart rate, body temperature, and oxygen levels. This information helps emergency services ensure the safety of personnel during critical missions.

1.1.3. Predictive Policing

By combining the IoT with predictive analytics, law enforcement can anticipate potential crimes in specific areas. IoT sensors, such as noise detectors and smart street lights, provide valuable data for proactive law enforcement activities.

1.2. IoT in Disaster Response

During natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods, or wildfires, the IoT plays a vital role in minimizing damage and coordinating response efforts.

1.2.1. Early Warning Systems

IoT sensors can be installed in regions prone to earthquakes, floods, or other natural disasters. These sensors monitor seismic activity, river water levels, and soil moisture in real time. Alerts are triggered when measurements reach critical thresholds, allowing timely evacuations.

1.2.2. Drone-Assisted Data Collection

Drones equipped with IoT sensors provide aerial imagery and real-time environmental data to assess affected areas. This assists emergency management teams in identifying critical areas requiring immediate intervention.

1.2.3. Smart Shelters

Smart shelters are equipped with IoT sensors that monitor crowd density, temperature, and available resources. These data help relief organizations allocate resources more effectively.

1.3. IoT in Emergency Management

The IoT is instrumental in enhancing emergency preparedness, response coordination, and recovery management.

1.3.1. Real-Time Resource Tracking

IoT-enabled tracking devices can be used to monitor the location of emergency vehicles and critical supplies, ensuring that resources are efficiently allocated during an emergency [2,3].

1.3.2. Smart Alarms and Evacuation Guidance

IoT smoke detectors, fire alarms, and evacuation guidance systems help detect emergencies early and provide occupants with clear evacuation instructions. By integrating with smart city infrastructure, these systems can also alert nearby hospitals and fire stations.

1.3.3. Infrastructure Monitoring

IoT devices monitor the structural integrity of bridges, buildings, and other critical infrastructure, as shown in Figure 2. The early detection of damage helps authorities respond before a catastrophic failure occurs.
The future of the IoT in public safety lies in the integration of artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and 5G networks. AI enhances the interpretation of IoT-generated data, while 5G provides the high-speed, low-latency connectivity required for real-time emergency responses.

2. Literature Review

The concept of interconnected devices dates back to the 1980s, when the idea of ubiquitous computing first gained traction. However, the term IoT was coined by Kevin Ashton in 1999, highlighting the potential of integrating physical objects with digital data and sensors. The rapid adoption of internet technologies, coupled with advancements in wireless communication, enabled the first practical IoT applications in the early 2000s, initially focused on industrial automation and consumer devices.
In the mid-2000s, governments began to explore IoT’s potential for public safety. Initial applications included smart surveillance cameras and connected smoke detectors. These devices provided enhanced situational awareness and early warning capabilities for incidents such as fire outbreaks and unauthorized access. The integration of closed-circuit television (CCTV) with the IoT to create smart surveillance systems has since become a pivotal tool in monitoring public areas and preventing crimes [4,5].
The use of the IoT for disaster response gained momentum in the aftermath of natural disasters such as Hurricane Katrina [6] and the Indian Ocean Tsunami [7]. In these situations, a lack of real-time information led to inefficient response efforts. Recognizing the need for improved situational awareness, researchers and agencies began deploying sensor networks and drones equipped with IoT technology to provide real-time information on disaster zones. For example, during the 2011 Japan earthquake, drones were used for the aerial surveillance of affected regions [5].
By the 2010s, the IoT began to be integrated more deeply into emergency management systems, driven by the development of cloud computing and edge analytics. These technologies enabled IoT devices to collect and process large amounts of data in real time, allowing emergency responders to optimize resource allocation and decision-making processes [6].
IoT applications in public safety primarily focus on predictive policing, traffic management, and public area monitoring. According to Javed et al. [4], smart cameras connected to centralized systems enable law enforcement to efficiently monitor public spaces, detect suspicious behavior, and prevent crimes. In recent research, wearable IoT devices have been explored for first responders, providing real-time biometric data and location tracking to ensure their safety during critical situations [4]. Predictive analytics is another crucial area where the IoT has been used to enhance public safety. By analyzing data from noise sensors, street lights, and traffic cameras, predictive models can help authorities anticipate where crimes might occur and deploy resources accordingly [7].
The role of the IoT in disaster response is characterized by real-time monitoring, early warnings, and efficient resource coordination. Liu et al. [5] reviewed the use of IoT-enabled drones and autonomous vehicles in disaster-hit areas to provide real-time aerial images and search-and-rescue operations. This approach significantly reduces the risks associated with human intervention in dangerous environments, improving the safety of first responders.
Early warning systems are one of the most impactful applications of IoT in disaster response. By leveraging networks of sensors that monitor environmental conditions such as river levels, temperature, and seismic activity, these systems can predict floods, fires, or earthquakes and issue timely alerts to vulnerable communities. A case study on the deployment of flood sensors in India demonstrated that the IoT can reduce response times and potentially save lives [8].
In emergency management, the IoT plays a crucial role in resource optimization, communication, and situational awareness. IoT networks integrated with emergency response platforms help authorities track the status of emergency vehicles, medical supplies, and shelters in real time [8]. This tracking is critical for ensuring that resources reach affected areas without delay, especially during large-scale emergencies.
Recent studies emphasize the importance of real-time infrastructure monitoring. IoT sensors embedded in bridges, buildings, and dams enable the early detection of structural weaknesses, allowing for preventive measures to be taken before a catastrophic failure occurs [9]. Such proactive measures can mitigate the impact of natural disasters, especially in urban areas [10].
Despite the benefits, implementing the IoT for public safety and disaster management poses challenges. Data privacy and security are major concerns, as IoT networks often handle sensitive information that is vulnerable to cyber-attacks [11]. Interoperability between different IoT devices and systems is another significant challenge, requiring standardized communication protocols to ensure seamless integration [12,13].
Furthermore, infrastructure costs remain a major hurdle in developing countries, where the deployment of large-scale sensor networks and smart devices is limited by budget constraints [14]. Researchers are exploring low-cost IoT solutions and energy-efficient sensors to address these issues and make the IoT more accessible [15,16].

3. Case Study 1: Smart City of Barcelona, Spain

Barcelona has integrated IoT solutions as part of its Smart City Initiative to promote urban sustainability, safety, and resilience. These initiatives include smart surveillance, environmental monitoring, and predictive safety measures.

3.1. IoT Applications in Public Safety

Barcelona has implemented IoT-enabled CCTV cameras that monitor activity across public spaces. Using AI and machine learning, these cameras detect unusual activities and provide alerts to the central control room. Additionally, smart streetlights are equipped with motion detectors that adjust lighting levels based on foot traffic, which enhances safety in otherwise dark or isolated areas, as shown in Figure 3.

3.2. Performance Comparison: Before and After IoT Implementation

A comparison of public safety metrics before and after the deployment of the IoT in Barcelona indicates a significant reduction in the response time and crime rates in monitored areas.
Figure 4 illustrates the impact of IoT implementation on public safety metrics, including crime rate reduction, the average response time, and lighting efficiency improvements.
  • Crime Rate Reduction: 25% decrease in crime in monitored areas
  • Average Response Time: Reduced from 15 min to 8 min
  • Lighting Efficiency: 30% reduction in energy consumption with smart streetlights

3.3. IoT in Disaster Response

Barcelona also uses water level sensors to monitor potential flooding. During heavy rainfall, these sensors detect changes in water levels and activate automatic water pumps to divert excess water, minimizing flood damage. Figure 5 depicts the installation of IoT sensors along riverbanks and drainage systems, monitoring water levels in real-time and transmitting the data to a central monitoring station for effective flood management.

4. Case Study 2: Earthquake Early Warning System in Tokyo, Japan

Tokyo, located in a seismically active region, has developed an IoT-based Earthquake Early Warning System (EEWS) to enhance disaster preparedness and minimize the loss of life. The EEWS involves a network of seismic sensors placed across various locations to detect initial tremors. The system alerts the public using sirens, mobile applications, and digital public screens, providing critical seconds to prepare before the earthquake strikes. This advanced notice has been used to shut down critical infrastructure, such as power stations and trains, to minimize damage, as shown in Figure 6.
The implementation of the EEWS in Tokyo has significantly improved preparedness during seismic events (Figure 7).
  • Warning Time Provided: Up to 60 s before tremor impact
  • Reduction in Casualties: Estimated 20% decrease in injuries during moderate earthquakes
  • Infrastructure Protection: Reduced incidents of machinery damage due to automated shutdowns
Figure 8 depicts the workflow involving seismic sensors detecting ground tremors, data transmission to a central control center, threat assessment, and the triggering of public alert mechanisms such as sirens, digital screens, and mobile notifications.

5. Performance Comparison of IoT Implementations

Figure 9 provides a comparative analysis of key performance improvements across different IoT implementations in Barcelona (public safety), Tokyo (EEWS), and California (wildfire response), highlighting metrics such as the reduction in response time, reduction in incidents, and improvements in resource efficiency.
Table 1 presents the comparative analysis results for key performance improvements across different IoT implementations.
Figure 10 shows a comparison of the energy consumption before and after the deployment of IoT solutions in Barcelona (smart streetlights), Tokyo (EEWS), and California (wildfire sensors). It shows a significant reduction in energy usage, highlighting the efficiency brought by IoT implementations.

5.1. Reduction in Response Time

IoT implementations resulted in significant response time reductions.
  • Barcelona: 47% reduction in emergency response time (public safety).
  • Tokyo: 60 s warning before earthquakes (disaster response).
  • California: 44% reduction in wildfire response time.

5.2. Reduction in Incidents

  • Barcelona: 25% reduction in crime rates.
  • Tokyo: 20% reduction in casualties and 30% reduction in infrastructure damage during earthquakes.
  • California: 15% reduction in the area affected by wildfires.

5.3. Energy and Resource Efficiency

  • Barcelona: 30% reduction in energy consumption through smart streetlights.
  • Tokyo and California: IoT systems helped optimize resource usage, improving resource efficiency by 20–30%.
  • Barcelona: Smart streetlights contributed to an energy consumption reduction of 30%, using motion detection to reduce unnecessary lighting.
  • Tokyo: The integration of the IoT into early warning systems improved energy efficiency by preventing the overuse of emergency systems.
  • California: Environmental sensors powered by efficient systems reduced energy usage by 20%, especially during fire monitoring.
The energy consumption graph highlighted that IoT implementations, particularly smart streetlights in Barcelona, led to significant energy savings across all regions.

6. Challenges in Implementing IoT for Public Safety and Disaster Management

The large-scale deployment of IoT sensors requires stringent data privacy and cybersecurity measures to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive data. Public acceptance and trust in IoT systems are closely tied to the perceived security of these systems [17]. A robust communication network is essential for the reliability of IoT-based systems, especially during emergencies when traditional infrastructure may fail [18]. Redundant network pathways and low-power wide-area networks (LPWANs) are recommended to address this challenge. The integration of devices from different manufacturers often leads to interoperability challenges. Adopting common IoT protocols and standards facilitates smoother integration and more efficient communication between devices. The IoT’s ability to provide real-time data and support predictive analysis is crucial for proactive measures in public safety and emergency management [19]. AI and machine learning models can analyze IoT data to improve early warning systems and decision-making processes. IoT solutions must be integrated with existing emergency infrastructure for seamless operation. Public–private partnerships are essential for the large-scale deployment and integration of IoT systems [20]. Successful deployment also requires educating the community on how to respond to alerts. Public awareness campaigns that explain how to interpret IoT alerts can significantly enhance community resilience during emergencies [21].

7. Conclusions

IoT-based technologies have significantly contributed to enhancing public safety and improving emergency response mechanisms. By enabling real-time monitoring, early warnings, and efficient resource allocation, the IoT has fundamentally reshaped how cities address emergencies and disasters. The comparative performance analyses of IoT systems in cities including Barcelona, Tokyo, and California highlight the immense potential of the IoT to save lives, reduce damage, and optimize the use of resources. However, to fully leverage the benefits of the IoT, cities and countries must invest in overcoming challenges such as data privacy, interoperability, and network reliability. With advancements in AI, renewable energy solutions, and public awareness campaigns, the IoT has the potential to further transform urban safety and emergency preparedness in the coming years.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author due to privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gubbi, J.; Buyya, R.; Marusic, S.; Palaniswami, M. Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2013, 29, 1645–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Perera, C.; Zaslavsky, A.; Christen, P.; Georgakopoulos, D. Context-aware computing for the Internet of Things: A survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2014, 16, 414–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jan, H.; Vlasios, T.; Catherine, M.; Stamatis, K.; Stefan, A.; David, B. From Machine-to-Machine to the Internet of Things: Introduction to a New Age of Intelligence; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  4. Javed, Y.; Ahmed, S.; Ikram, M. IoT-enabled smart cities: Emerging applications, technologies, and challenges. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 61, 102337. [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu, Z.; Liu, S.; Li, W. Drones and IoT for Smart Emergency Management: Challenges and Opportunities. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 9, 1745–1758. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rhodes, J.; Chan, C.; Paxson, C.; Rouse, C.E.; Waters, M.; Fussell, E. The impact of hurricane Katrina on the mental and physical health of low-income parents in New Orleans. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 2010, 80, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  7. Ramalanjaona, G. Impact of 2004 tsunami in the islands of Indian ocean: Lessons learned. Emerg. Med. Int. 2011, 2011, 920813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  8. Mohsin, A.S.; Choudhury, S.H.; Muyeed, M.A. Automatic priority analysis of emergency response systems using internet of things (IoT) and machine learning (ML). Transp. Eng. 2025, 19, 100304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Leong, W.Y. Investigating and Enhancing Energy Management Policy and Strategies in ASEAN. In Proceedings of the 2023 Asia Meeting on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEE-AM), Hanoi, Vietnam, 13–15 November 2023; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wah, C.K.; Zakaria, R.; Adnan, A.; Yie, L.W. Various Techniques on Retrofitting for Earthquake Hazard Mitigation. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2018, 7, 167–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Leong, W.Y. Industry 5.0: Design, Standards, Techniques and Applications for Manufacturing; The Institution of Engineering and Technology, IET: London, UK, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  12. Damaševičius, R.; Bacanin, N.; Misra, S. From Sensors to Safety: Internet of Emergency Services (IoES) for Emergency Response and Disaster Management. J. Sens. Actuator Netw. 2023, 12, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Leong, W.Y.; Leong, Y.Z.; Leong, W.S. Energy demand forecasting and optimization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Logistics and Industrial Engineering, ICLIE, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 1 December 2024. [Google Scholar]
  14. Leong, W.Y. Virtual Reality-Driven Training for Environmental Resilience and Disaster Preparedness. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Sustainable Development of Water and Environment (ICSDWE 2025), Bali Island, Indonesia, 25–27 July 2025. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ahn, J.K.; Kim, T.H.; Koo, H. Design for Optimized Public Safety and Earthquake Disaster Mitigation With IoT. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 43485–43494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Leong, W.Y. Energy Energy-Efficient Retrofitting: Strategies for Reducing Carbon Footprint in Existing Structures. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Geosynthetics and Environmental Engineering (ICGEE 2025), Seoul, Republic of Korea, 22–24 March 2025. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kamruzzaman, M.; Sarkar, N.I.; Gutierrez, J.; Ray, S.K. A study of IoT-based post-disaster management. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN), Da Nang, Vietnam, 11–13 January 2017; pp. 406–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Khan, A.M.; Alrasheed, K.A.; Waqar, A.; Almujibah, H.; Benjeddou, O. Internet of things (IoT) for safety and efficiency in construction building site operations. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 28914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mohsin, A.S.M.; Muyeed, M.A. IoT based smart emergency response system (SERS) for monitoring vehicle, home and health status. Discov. Internet Things 2024, 4, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Santos, A.S.; Goncales, I.; Silva, A.; Neves, R.; Teixeira, I.; Barbosa, E.; Gava, V.; Yoshida, O. Smart resilience through IoT-enabled natural disaster management: A COVID-19 response in São Paulo state. IET Smart Cities 2024, 6, 211–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Du, C.D.; Zhu, S.B. Research on Urban Public Safety Emergency Management Early Warning System based on Technologies for the Internet of Things. Procedia Eng. 2012, 45, 748–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Real-time monitoring using IoT cameras.
Figure 1. Real-time monitoring using IoT cameras.
Engproc 92 00061 g001
Figure 2. Monitoring structural health with IoT devices.
Figure 2. Monitoring structural health with IoT devices.
Engproc 92 00061 g002
Figure 3. IoT-enabled smart cameras and streetlights in Barcelona.
Figure 3. IoT-enabled smart cameras and streetlights in Barcelona.
Engproc 92 00061 g003
Figure 4. Comparison of public safety metrics in Barcelona.
Figure 4. Comparison of public safety metrics in Barcelona.
Engproc 92 00061 g004
Figure 5. Water flow management with IoT sensors.
Figure 5. Water flow management with IoT sensors.
Engproc 92 00061 g005
Figure 6. Seismic sensors and alert system in Tokyo.
Figure 6. Seismic sensors and alert system in Tokyo.
Engproc 92 00061 g006
Figure 7. Effectiveness of EEWS in Tokyo.
Figure 7. Effectiveness of EEWS in Tokyo.
Engproc 92 00061 g007
Figure 8. Seismic sensor workflow in Tokyo’s EEWS.
Figure 8. Seismic sensor workflow in Tokyo’s EEWS.
Engproc 92 00061 g008
Figure 9. Comparative performance metrics for IoT implementations.
Figure 9. Comparative performance metrics for IoT implementations.
Engproc 92 00061 g009
Figure 10. Energy consumption graph for IoT implementations.
Figure 10. Energy consumption graph for IoT implementations.
Engproc 92 00061 g010
Table 1. Comparative performance metrics for IoT implementations. (N/A = Not applicable).
Table 1. Comparative performance metrics for IoT implementations. (N/A = Not applicable).
MetricBarcelona (Public Safety)Tokyo (Earthquake Early Warning)California (Wildfire Response)
Reduction in Response Time47% (15 min to 8 min)Early Warning (up to 60 s)44% (45 min to 25 min)
Reduction in CasualtiesN/A20%N/A
Reduction in Incidents25% crime rate reduction30% infrastructure protection15% wildfire-affected area
Energy/Resource Efficiency30% energy reductionN/A20% resource optimization
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Leong, W. Internet of Things for Enhancing Public Safety, Disaster Response, and Emergency Management. Eng. Proc. 2025, 92, 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025092061

AMA Style

Leong W. Internet of Things for Enhancing Public Safety, Disaster Response, and Emergency Management. Engineering Proceedings. 2025; 92(1):61. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025092061

Chicago/Turabian Style

Leong, Waiyie. 2025. "Internet of Things for Enhancing Public Safety, Disaster Response, and Emergency Management" Engineering Proceedings 92, no. 1: 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025092061

APA Style

Leong, W. (2025). Internet of Things for Enhancing Public Safety, Disaster Response, and Emergency Management. Engineering Proceedings, 92(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025092061

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop