Next Article in Journal
Improved Control Mechanism of Bottleneck Bandwidth and Round-Trip Propagation Time v3 Congestion with Enhanced Fairness and Efficiency
Previous Article in Journal
Advanced Machine Learning for Preschooler Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis in Classification of Anxiety Disorders
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Synergies Between Virtual Commissioning and Digital Twins †

by
Hermann Boris Djeulezeck Tanegue
1,
William de Paula Ferreira
1,*,
Rodrigo Furlan de Assis
1 and
David Brodeur
2
1
Department of Systems Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure (ÉTS), 1100 Notre Dame Street, West, Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada
2
Productique Québec, Sherbrooke, QC J1G 4L3, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2024 IEEE 7th International Conference on Knowledge Innovation and Invention, Nagoya, Japan, 16–18 August 2024.
Eng. Proc. 2025, 89(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025089012
Published: 24 February 2025

Abstract

:
Virtual commissioning (VC) and digital twins (DTs) are two key enabling technologies of Industry 4.0 (I4.0), which can enhance operational efficiency, optimize resource utilization, streamline the development and deployment of automation systems, and accelerate innovation in manufacturing and industrial processes. However, studies examining the synergy between these two technologies are still lacking. To address this research gap, this study aims to investigate the technological relationships and synergies between VC and DTs in the context of I4.0. The results suggest a strong relationship between VC and DTs since they share similar technological components, such as the digital model. Moreover, the result indicates that the concurrent use of VC and DTs can help leverage both technologies and their added value by increasing model reusability. Different strategies are proposed for combining VC and DT functionalities, highlighting how VC can support DTs, how DTs can support VC, and how both technologies can be integrated. It also provides future research directions.

1. Introduction

Virtual commissioning (VC) and digital twins (DTs) are two primary simulation-based technologies adopted in the context of Industry 4.0 (I4.0) [1,2,3,4]. VC facilitates virtual testing and systems validation before physical commissioning, reducing integration problems and saving time for optimization or early delivery [5]. DTs involve creating digital counterparts of a physical system, which can simulate, monitor, and optimize system performance [6]. The synergistic application of VC and DTs facilitates the application of both technologies and increases the accuracy and reusability of digital models [7]. This integration is increasingly recognized as transformative, attracting increased interest from academia and industry alike [8].
VC is mainly used in designing and developing automation control systems to facilitate the testing, verification, and validation of programmable logic controller (PLC) codes and systems integration. This approach enhances system reliability from the earliest stages of development [9]. VC methods for production systems include virtual commissioning Software-in-the-Loop (SIL) and Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) [10]. SIL establishes a fully virtualized test environment by integrating a virtual plant with a virtual controller to enhance design accuracy and operational readiness. On the other hand, HIL involves a real controller, enabling real-time testing of the controller’s physical components within a simulated operational context. Integrated into the DT framework, these VC techniques can complement and enhance the accuracy of design simulations and the operational efficiency of systems.
DTs are mainly used for product and asset life cycle management. It is based on three essential components: physical models in the real world, virtual models in a digital environment, and data connections that facilitate interactions between the two [11]. Furthermore, in exploring DT-related concepts, Kritzinger et al. [12] emphasize the importance of understanding the distinction between three key terms: “digital model”, “digital shadow”, and “digital twins”. The digital model refers to a simplified representation of a physical object, often static and without continuous interaction with its physical counterpart. The digital shadow is more dynamic, so it reflects changes in the physical object in real time but with limited interaction. Finally, DTs represent the most advanced integration, with a digital replica constantly interacting (in real or near real-time) with its physical counterpart.
Although considerable research has been carried out on the individual applications of VC and DTs in the context of I4.0, more research is needed on their use in an integrated way. The combined architecture of VC and DTs represents an advanced integrated approach in I4.0 [10,11,12]. Studies generally focus on optimizing the stand-alone capabilities of VC and DTs, such as improving system testing through VC or enhancing life cycle management with DTs [13,14]. However, these works do not explore the possible synergies that arise from a cohesive application of both technologies. The intersection of VC and DTs where virtual testing and real-time system monitoring could theoretically converge thus remains to be explored.
This study aims to fill this gap by investigating how VC can complement DTs and vice versa, through a systematic review of studies implementing VC and DTs. The review identifies key statistics and trends that illustrate the current status and impact of such integrations using bibliometric and content analysis. The analysis also focuses on the methodologies and spin-offs to find out (1) how VC supports the development of DTs, (2) how DTs support the development and effectiveness of VC, and (3) the consequences of their mutual option or integration.
The remainder of this article is organized as follows. Section 2 introduces the methodology. Section 3 presents the results, followed by a discussion in Section 4. Section 5 presents avenues for future research. Lastly, Section 6 concludes this study.

2. Methodology

We adopted the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analyses (PRISMA) methodology [15,16]. Its flowchart details the process during the various stages of the review (identification, eligibility assessment, and inclusion) and its checklist provides guidelines on the elements. In total, 136 articles were initially retrieved using the research protocol in Table 1. After screening, 75 records were discarded since they were outside the scope of this research—not exploring both VC and DTs narrowed down the scope to 61 studies. Six articles were excluded because DTs and VC were only used as keywords or quoted expressions. The remaining 55 articles were then prepared for in-depth review.

3. Results

3.1. Bibliometric Analysis

Figure 1 shows the distribution of publications over time. This result was used to infer a growing trend in the scientific literature on the adoption or integration of VC and DTs.
We analyzed 55 articles, 38 of which were published in 26 conferences, highlighting various forums. Among these, publications in the Procedia Conference series—including Procedia CIRP and Procedia Manufacturing—totaled 11 articles, corresponding to 29%. IEEE conferences, such as the “IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies” and “Factory Automation”, and the “IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics”, contributed 9 articles (23%). The remaining 18 articles (48%) were distributed among various other conferences. The review included 17 articles (31%) published in peer-reviewed journals. The journal “Machines” stands out with three articles (5.45%). Other journals, such as “Sensors”, “IEEE Access” and the “International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing” contributed one article, reflecting the diversity of academic forums dealing with VC and DTs.
Figure 2 illustrates the distribution of the most frequent terms taken from the publications’ titles, abstracts, and keywords, using VOSviewer to visualize word density. This representation reveals three main clusters, focusing on key themes: VC, DTs, and production system.
Figure 3 shows the geographical distribution by institutional affiliation of authors. Germany leads with 70 affiliations, followed by China and Spain with 29 and 19 affiliations, respectively. Belgium and Sweden also stand out with 16 and 14 affiliations, while the United Kingdom and Russia have 13 authors each. The United States and Italy have eight authors each, and Finland and Mexico have six authors. Japan and France have one and five authors.
Most of the research on VC combined with DTs is carried out in Europe, with Germany having the highest author contributions (Figure 3). The number of authors from China and Spain indicates a growing interest in the research area. The diversity of affiliations/countries suggests a global recognition of the importance of these technologies. Figure 4 represents a collaboration matrix of the authors’ affiliations to understand frequent interactions and prominent scientific collaborations. The publications by Germany, China, and Belgium highlight national research networks. The heatmap suggests that future initiatives foster diverse collaborations, particularly between countries with significant individual contributions but less involved in collaborative efforts.
VC allows a manufacturing system to be verified by performing an emulation involving a virtual factory and a controller or a virtual factory with a simulated controller [17]. Figure 5 shows the predominance of the SIL method with 51% of the publications. This is followed by HIL and the combination of SIL and HIL with 18% and 16%, respectively. Figure 5 shows a preference for SIL due to its flexibility for detailed simulation without specific hardware. Despite offering a more comprehensive and integrated simulation, the combined use of SIL and HIL appears in lower proportion, suggesting limitations such as complexity and higher costs.
In total, 42% adopt the open platform communications unified architecture (OPC UA) protocol which has interoperability and security and is essential for efficient systems integration in industrial environments. The TCP/IP and PROFINET protocols are less frequent with 5 and 2%, respectively. Interestingly, 49% of the publications do not specify the communication protocol. Furthermore, 18 dealt with “Hypothetical Problems”, while 17 addressed “Real Problems”, indicating an almost equal split between theoretical investigations and applications. Finally, 17 articles were categorized as “Conceptual Studies”. Three publications are “Literature Reviews”, with different scopes from this research.

3.2. Content Analysis

To better grasp the concepts of VC and DTs, an in-depth comparative analysis of these technologies was carried out, highlighting their main similarities and differences (Table 2).
The link between VC and DTs reveals its potential and attracts increasing attention in research from academia and industry alike [18]. It is essential to create an environment where these applications are optimally explored [19]. This integrated approach has growing interest, encouraging further research. As illustrated in Figure 6, three strategies combining VC and DT technologies were identified.
  • VC supports DTs: VC refines DTs using high-precision simulations to model realistic behavior, thus strengthening life cycle management and facilitating continuous improvement. The simulation models developed for VC are reused to facilitate DT development.
  • DTs support VC: This strategy uses DTs to improve VC by verifying designs and validating control configurations before deployment, simplifying testing, and enhancing reliability.
  • Integration of VC and DTs: This strategy harnesses the symbiotic relationship between VC and DTs to maximize the benefits of each technology. It ensures real-time synchronization with operational data, increasing their effectiveness from the initial design phases. One of the main approaches is to make VC a subcomponent of DTs, whose scope of application is vast and extends across the entire product and plant life cycles [20].
Table 3 shows the examples of applications of these three approaches to combining VC with DTs. DTs reinforce VC by verifying initial designs, testing, and validating new PLC and HMI controls. At the same time, VC contributes to DT development by enabling accurate simulations and immersive experiences. The techniques used for this integration vary, from combining mechanical and electrical systems to create DTs to using advanced platforms such as Matlab Simulink and CoDeSys to simulate the behavior of complex systems. In addition, VC models are used to support and improve the efficiency of DTs, since designing DTs involves creating a virtual prototype connected to a system simulator and an industrial controller [21]. As an example, Khan et al. [22] introduce a model analysis-based platform that offers manufacturing companies an initial means of integrating a VC model that functions as a DT. These approaches demonstrate how VC and DT models are used strategically to improve the design and functionality of industrial systems.

4. Discussion

The results of the study highlight the predominant use of SIL VC methodologies and their flexibility and capacity to conduct detailed simulations in the absence of specific hardware requirements. Nonetheless, the sparse application of hybrid SIL and HIL approaches indicates challenges such as increased complexity and elevated costs. The results also emphasize the distinct but complementary roles of VC and DTs. While VC is predominantly used in pre-operational phases to simulate and test systems for validation purposes, DTs extend their usefulness throughout the system’s operational life cycle, continuously interacting with and adapting to the real system. This delimitation encompasses the scope and application of VC and DTs in industrial practice, as it reflects the need for technologies that can accurately initialize systems and dynamically adapt over time.
VC can support DT development by offering high-fidelity simulations that accurately reflect real-world behavior. These simulations based mainly on SIL methods allow detailed modeling without specific hardware to reduce costs and increase the flexibility of the development process. As highlighted by Lechler et al. [20], VC simulation models serve as the basis for the development of DT models. Also, DTs can support VC by improving the accuracy of post-commissioning simulations and responding adaptively in real time to production challenges. The combination of DTs with VC allows the accurate verification of designs and the validation of control configurations before deployment and continuous improvement after commissioning [33,34].
The integration of VC and DTs allows for optimizing the development and management of industrial systems [20]. This integration is manifested through a progression methodology that enables a seamless two-way process flow, connecting simulation paradigms to bring the virtual and physical spheres together. In addition, this collaboration facilitates better anticipation and management of potential problems, both before and during production, as indicated by Shen et al. [35] and Wang et al. [36], highlighting the critical relevance of this integration for I4.0. By enabling real-time synchronization with operational data, the strengths of both technologies are used to optimize system design and functionality, from the initial phases to maintenance. Moreover, VC is used at particular points in the plant life cycle and depends heavily on simulation model availability, which requires significant effort to develop, preventing VC from being widely adopted in the industry due to its cost [37,38]. However, by integrating the adoption of VC with DTs which relies on simulation models, the use of VC is prolonged to prorate the development cost with DTs, making its adoption appealing to the industry. As highlighted in reference [37], simulation models developed for VC cannot be reused without major effort for DTs due to initial design choices. However, by considering the concurrent adoption of both technologies, engineers can develop simulation models in a way that they can be reused more easily.

5. Future Research

This study also reveals some directions for future research efforts (Figure 7). The use of VC and DT simulation models throughout the life cycle reveals a significant research opportunity in developing methodologies that transition between pre-operational VC simulations and continuous DT operational management [5]. These methodologies allow for the reuse of simulation models and real-time feedback from DT operations to refine VC simulations, optimize configuration, and make constant adjustments. Another gap exists in data management, where there is a need for hybrid models that integrate the hypothetical or design data of VC with the historical data of DTs. This integration increases the accuracy of simulations and the predictive capabilities of DTs. For this, real-time interaction/synchronization mechanisms also represent a challenge.
Other areas for future research are the automatic generation and reuse of simulation models, which represent an opportunity for sustainability and efficiency in VC and DT applications. Strategies for effective model reuse can significantly reduce resource consumption and accelerate the development process. This addresses the gap in current practices, where models are built from scratch for each new project, preventing the widespread adoption of VC and DTs. Lastly, education and training on VC and DTs must be conducted to prepare engineers to develop more complex automated systems in I4.0 and broaden the use of these technologies in industry.

6. Conclusions

We analyzed the synergies between VC and DT technologies in the context of I4.0 through a systematic literature review, enriching academic discourse on the subject. VC can support the development of DTs and vice versa, and the two technologies can be integrated with VC becoming a component of DTs. It highlights how these technologies significantly improve industrial system design, development, and improvement. By leveraging both VC’s ability to perform detailed pre-operational testing and DTs’ continuous monitoring and updating of system performance, substantial improvements in systems management can be achieved.
Combined VC and DTs improve simulation accuracy, facilitate its reuse, and enhance the life cycle management of industrial assets. This integrated approach promotes a more dynamic interaction between simulated models and real-world data, which contributes to the development of resilient and adaptable industrial systems. Specifically, the integration of VC and DTs facilitates real-time data flows that significantly improve decision-making processes and allow timely corrections and updates. These capabilities are key in today’s fast-changing industrial environments, where the ability to respond quickly and accurately to operational fluctuations significantly affects overall efficiency and productivity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.B.D.T. and W.d.P.F.; methodology, H.B.D.T. and W.d.P.F.; validation, H.B.D.T., W.d.P.F., R.F.d.A. and D.B.; formal analysis, H.B.D.T.; investigation, H.B.D.T.; resources, W.d.P.F. and D.B.; data curation, H.B.D.T.; writing—original draft preparation, H.B.D.T.; writing—review and editing, H.B.D.T., W.d.P.F., R.F.d.A. and D.B.; visualization, H.B.D.T., W.d.P.F. and R.F.d.A.; supervision, W.d.P.F.; project administration, W.d.P.F.; funding acquisition, W.d.P.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) through the Alliance Grants program [grant number ALLRP 592520-23] and the Discovery Grant program [grant number RGPIN-2024-03880], as well as by Mitacs through the Mitacs Accelerate program in Canada.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. de Paula Ferreira, W.; Armellini, F.; de Santa-Eulalia, L.A.; Rebolledo, C. Modelling and simulation in industry 4.0. In Artificial Intelligence in Industry 4.0: A Collection of Innovative Research Case-Studies That Are Reworking the Way We Look at Industry 4.0 Thanks to Artificial Intelligence; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 57–72. [Google Scholar]
  2. de Paula Ferreira, W.; Armellini, F.; de Santa-Eulalia, L.A.; Thomasset-Laperrière, V. A framework for identifying and analysing industry 4.0 scenarios. J. Manuf. Syst. 2022, 65, 192–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. de Assis, R.F.; Guerrini, F.M.; Santa-Eulalia, L.A.; de Paula Ferreira, W. An agent-based model for regional market penetration of electric vehicles in brazil. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 421, 138477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. de Paula Ferreira, W.; Armellini, F.; de Santa-Eulalia, L.A.; Thomasset-Laperrière, V. Extending the lean value stream mapping to the context of industry 4.0: An agent-based technology approach. J. Manuf. Syst. 2022, 63, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Striffler, N.; Voigt, T. Concepts and trends of virtual commissioning–a comprehensive review. J. Manuf. Syst. 2023, 71, 664–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jones, D.; Snider, C.; Nassehi, A.; Yon, J.; Hicks, B. Characterising the digital twin: A systematic literature review. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2020, 29, 36–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Marques, R.; de Paula Ferreira, W.; Nassif, G.; Armellini, F.; Dungen, J.; de Santa-Eulalia, L.A. Exploring the application of IoT in the service station business. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2021, 54, 402–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Leng, J.; Wang, D.; Shen, W.; Li, X.; Liu, Q.; Chen, X. Digital twins-based smart manufacturing system design in industry 4.0: A review. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 60, 119–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mueller, R.K.; Großmann, D.; Schmied, S.; Jumar, U. Co-Simulation im Planungsprozess für die Informationsmodell-basierte virtuelle Inbetriebnahme. at-Automatisierungstechnik 2022, 70, 612–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, C.G.; Park, S.C. Survey on the virtual commissioning of manufacturing systems. J. Comput. Des. Eng. 2014, 1, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Grieves, M. Digital twin: Manufacturing excellence through virtual factory replication. White Pap. 2014, 1, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kritzinger, W.; Karner, M.; Traar, G.; Henjes, J.; Sihn, W. Digital twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2018, 51, 1016–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gasiyarov, V.R.; Bovshik, P.A.; Loginov, B.M.; Karandaev, A.S.; Khramshin, V.R.; Radionov, A.A. Substantiating and im- plementing concept of digital twins for virtual commissioning of industrial mechatronic complexes exemplified by rolling mill coilers. Machines 2023, 11, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Serik, A.; Zhetpissov, Y.; Mosadeghzad, M.; Alizadeh, T. Digital twins development of automatic storage and retrieval station in a production line and an integrated robotic manipulator. In International Conference on Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 210–223. [Google Scholar]
  15. Page, M.J.; Moher, D.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. Prisma 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G.; The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The prisma statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009, 151, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Schamp, M.; Hoedt, S.; Claeys, A.; Aghezzaf, E.-H.; Cottyn, J. Impact of a virtual twin on commissioning time and quality. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2018, 51, 1047–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yin, Y.; Zheng, P.; Li, C.; Wang, L. A state-of-the-art survey on augmented reality-assisted digital twin for futuristic human-centric industry transformation. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 2023, 81, 102515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Christ, L.; Milloch, E.; Boshoff, M.; Hypki, A.; Kuhlenkötter, B. Implementation of digital twin and real production system to address actual and future challenges in assembly technology. Automation 2023, 4, 345–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lechler, T.; Fischer, E.; Metzner, M.; Mayr, A.; Franke, J. Virtual commissioning–scientific review and exploratory use cases in advanced production systems. Procedia CIRP 2019, 81, 1125–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Toivonen, V.; Lanz, M.; Nylund, H.; Nieminen, H. The fms training center-a versatile learning environment for engineering education. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 23, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Khan, A.; Dahl, M.; Falkman, P.; Fabian, M. Digital twin for legacy systems: Simulation model testing and validation. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 14th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), Munich, Germany, 20–24 August 2018; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 421–426. [Google Scholar]
  23. Barbieri, G.; Bertuzzi, A.; Capriotti, A.; Ragazzini, L.; Gutierrez, D.; Negri, E.; Fumagalli, L. A virtual commissioning-based methodology to integrate digital twins into manufacturing systems. Prod. Eng. 2021, 15, 397–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dosoftei, C.-C. Simulation power vs. immersive capabilities: Enhanced understanding and interaction with digital twin of a mecha- tronic system. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 6463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Albo, A.; Svedlund, L.; Falkman, P. Modular virtual preparation method of production systems using a digital twin architecture. In Proceedings of the 2021 26th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Vasteras, Sweden, 7–10 September 2021; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  26. Jeon, S.; Schuesslbauer, S. Digital twin application for production optimization. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Singapore, 14–17 December 2020; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 542–545. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ayani, M.; Ganeba, M.; Ng, A.H. Digital twin: Applying emulation for machine reconditioning. Procedia Cirp 2018, 72, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wu, B.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, K.; Wu, Z. Collaborative design and virtual commissioning of automated pharmacy based on digital twin. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 16th International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments (ICEMI), Harbin, China, 9–11 August 2023; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 335–340. [Google Scholar]
  29. Abassi, A.; Lugo-Calles, J.H.; Balderas-Hill, R.; Lassabe, N. Virtual commissioning implementation of industrial painting process. In Proceedings of the 2022 2nd International Conference on Computers and Automation (CompAuto), Paris, France, 18–20 August 2022; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 65–68. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hansen, J.P.D.O.; da Silva, E.R.; Bilberg, A.; Bro, C. Agile machine development from virtual to real. In Proceedings of the Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable and Virtual Production Conference and the World Mass Customization & Personalization Conference, Aalborg, Denmark, 1–2 November 2021; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 389–395. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mykoniatis, K.; Harris, G.A. A digital twin emulator of a modular production system using a data-driven hybrid modeling and simulation approach. J. Intell. Manuf. 2021, 32, 1899–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Phanden, R.K.; Sharma, P.; Dubey, A. A review on simulation in digital twin for aerospace, manufacturing and robotics. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 38, 174–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, X.; Du, X.; Wang, W.; Zhang, H. Virtual commissioning and process parameter optimization of rolling mill based on digital twin. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2024, 130, 705–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fernandez, I.A.; Eguía, M.A.; Echeverría, L.E. Virtual commissioning of a robotic cell: An educational case study. In Proceedings of the 2019 24th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Zaragoza, Spain, 10–13 September 2019; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 820–825. [Google Scholar]
  35. Shen, W.; Hu, T.; Yin, Y.; He, J.; Tao, F.; Nee, A. Digital twin based virtual commissioning for computerized numerical control machine tools. In Digital Twin Driven Smart Design; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 289–307. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang, J.; Niu, X.; Gao, R.X.; Huang, Z.; Xue, R. Digital twin-driven virtual commissioning of machine tool. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 2023, 81, 102499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Oppelt, M.; Urbas, L. Integrated virtual commissioning an essential activity in the automation engineering process: From virtual commissioning to simulation supported engineering. In Proceedings of the IECON 2014—40th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Dallas, TX, USA, 29 October–1 November 2014; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 2564–2570. [Google Scholar]
  38. Oppelt, M.; Wolf, G.; Urbas, L. Towards an integrated use of simulation within the life-cycle of a process plant. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 20th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation (ETFA), Luxembourg, 8–11 September 2015; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Number of publications per year.
Figure 1. Number of publications per year.
Engproc 89 00012 g001
Figure 2. Keywords network visualization. The green nodes represent the Digital Twins cluster, the red nodes represent the Virtual Commissioning cluster, and the blue nodes represent the Production Systems cluster.
Figure 2. Keywords network visualization. The green nodes represent the Digital Twins cluster, the red nodes represent the Virtual Commissioning cluster, and the blue nodes represent the Production Systems cluster.
Engproc 89 00012 g002
Figure 3. Geographical distribution by affiliation of authors.
Figure 3. Geographical distribution by affiliation of authors.
Engproc 89 00012 g003
Figure 4. Collaboration. The color intensity represents the number of co-authored publications between countries, with darker shades indicating stronger collaboration.
Figure 4. Collaboration. The color intensity represents the number of co-authored publications between countries, with darker shades indicating stronger collaboration.
Engproc 89 00012 g004
Figure 5. Virtual commissioning methods.
Figure 5. Virtual commissioning methods.
Engproc 89 00012 g005
Figure 6. Taxonomy of approaches of combining VC and DTs.
Figure 6. Taxonomy of approaches of combining VC and DTs.
Engproc 89 00012 g006
Figure 7. Main research directions.
Figure 7. Main research directions.
Engproc 89 00012 g007
Table 1. Search Protocol.
Table 1. Search Protocol.
Data source:Scopus
Search string:“Virtual commissioning” AND “Digital twin”
Period:From 2011 (emergence of the term Industry 4.0) to 31 January 2024
Search fields:Title, abstract, and keywords
Language:English
Document:Journal and Conference articles
Table 2. Differences and Similarities of VC and DTs.
Table 2. Differences and Similarities of VC and DTs.
FeaturesVCDTs
PurposeSimulate and test systems before commissioning for factory acceptance tests.Create and maintain an up-to-date digital replica of the real system.
Life cycleUsed at specific points
in the plant life cycles.
It can be used throughout the product and plant life cycles.
SystemDoes not require an
existing system.
Requires an existing system with connected devices.
Data typesUse hypothetical or
simulated data.
Use real and historical data for simulation and analysis.
OptimizationOfflineBoth offline and online
TechnologiesSimulation models, PLCs, and communication protocols.Mainly simulation models, sensors, actuators, smart devices, communication protocols and data service.
Table 3. Examples of Approaches Combining VC and DTs.
Table 3. Examples of Approaches Combining VC and DTs.
ClassApproachRef.
VC
supports
DT
Use CoDeSys Win Control V3 and OPC with Experior to test and validate the DT designed in Matlab, facilitating optimization, simulation, and debugging in a virtual environment integrated into manufacturing systems.[23]
Use Automation Studio for its precision in closed-loop simulation and testing (HIL, SIL), to develop a DT with Unity, benefiting from an immersive experience and improving the interaction between the DT and its real-life counterpart.[24]
Integrate CoDeSys for PLC logic and OPC UA for signal exchange between Simulink and Webots, ensuring precise information processing and instant visual feedback, while developing a modular VC architecture to prepare a DT. [25]
Proposes a three-phase methodology for the DT: digital simulation of real-world behavior, communication via PLC code between the real and virtual worlds (VC), and integration of the simulation with real-world automation, followed by the complete implementation of the DT of a production line.[26]
DT
supports
VC
Use a DT developed with Simumatik3D to facilitate
reverse engineering via VC to verify initial designs and test new PLC and HMI controls, reducing cost and time to actual commissioning.
[27]
Combine mechanical and electrical systems to create a DT, to which control logic is applied via a virtual debugging interface, solving the problems of long development cycles, high costs, and incompatibility between research and development.[28]
Combines semantically DT, industrial controller, and SCADA via OPC UA to describe an efficient VC method for the paint industry.[29]
Integration
of
VC and DT
Proposes a progression methodology from VC simulation
to DT and vice versa, establishing a seamless bidirectional process flow between software and virtual/real interaction for machine development in a dynamic industrial context.
[30]
Integrates discrete-event simulation and agent-based modeling to connect DT Emulation (DTE) with a PLC, boosting the efficiency and reliability of modular production systems.[31]
Examines recent methods for developing VC-enhanced DT and the use of DT-optimized VC models, enabling accurate simulation during both design and operation.[32]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tanegue, H.B.D.; de Paula Ferreira, W.; de Assis, R.F.; Brodeur, D. Synergies Between Virtual Commissioning and Digital Twins. Eng. Proc. 2025, 89, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025089012

AMA Style

Tanegue HBD, de Paula Ferreira W, de Assis RF, Brodeur D. Synergies Between Virtual Commissioning and Digital Twins. Engineering Proceedings. 2025; 89(1):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025089012

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tanegue, Hermann Boris Djeulezeck, William de Paula Ferreira, Rodrigo Furlan de Assis, and David Brodeur. 2025. "Synergies Between Virtual Commissioning and Digital Twins" Engineering Proceedings 89, no. 1: 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025089012

APA Style

Tanegue, H. B. D., de Paula Ferreira, W., de Assis, R. F., & Brodeur, D. (2025). Synergies Between Virtual Commissioning and Digital Twins. Engineering Proceedings, 89(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025089012

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop