Energy Absorption Characteristics of Biodegradable and Recyclable Composite with Interlocking Periodic Honeycomb Sandwich Structure †
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.2. Specimen Preparation
2.3. Experimental Test
2.4. Finite Element Modelling
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Results of Tensile Load
3.2. Results of Quasi-Static Compressive Load
3.3. Results of Experimental Test and Finite Element Modelling
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| ASTM | American Society for Testing and Materials |
| EA | Energy absorption |
| FEA | Finite element analysis |
| PALF | Pineapple leaf fibre |
| PLA | Polylactic acid |
| SEA | Specific energy absorption |
References
- Supian, A.B.M.; Asyraf, M.R.M.; Syamsir, A.; Ma, Q.; Hazrati, K.Z.; Azlin, M.N.M.; Mubarak Ali, M.; Ghani, A.; Hua, L.S.; SaifulAzry, S.; et al. Kenaf/glass fiber-reinforced polymer composites: Pioneering sustainable materials with enhanced mechanical and tribological properties. Polym. Compos. 2024, 45, 14421–14447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanaka, R.; Sahu, S.K.; Sreekanth, P.R.; Senthilkumar, K.; Badgayan, N.D.; Siva, B.V.; Ma, Q. A review of the current state of research and future prospectives on stimulus-responsive shape memory polymer composite and its blends. J. Compos. Sci. 2024, 8, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taib, N.A.A.B.; Rahman, M.R.; Huda, D.; Kuok, K.K.; Hamdan, S.; Bakri, M.K.B.; Julaihi, M.R.M.B.; Khan, A. A review on poly lactic acid (PLA) as a biodegradable polymer. Polym. Bull. 2023, 80, 1179–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ng, L.F.; Rahman, M.Z.; Ma, Q.; Azad, H.M.; Yahya, M.Y.; Rejab, M.R.M. Characterisation of eco-friendly fibers and polymers for the sustainable environment. In Eco-Friendly Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite Materials; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2026; pp. 109–133. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, Q.; Rejab, M.R.M.; Siregar, J.P.; Guan, Z. A review of the recent trends on core structures and impact response of sandwich panels. J. Compos. Mater. 2021, 55, 2513–2555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Q.; Kuai, T.; Rejab, M.R.M.; Kumar, N.M.; Idris, M.S.; Abdullah, M.H. Effect of boundary factor and material property on single square honeycomb sandwich panel subjected to quasi-static compression loading. J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2020, 14, 7348–7360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ng, L.F.; Yahya, M.Y.; Muthukumar, C.; Parameswaranpillai, J.; Ma, Q.; Muhammad Asyraf, M.R.; Abdul Majid, R. Mechanical characterisation, water absorption, and thickness swelling of lightweight pineapple leaf/ramie fabric-reinforced polypropylene hybrid composites. Polymers 2024, 16, 1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ravichandran, G.; Ramasamy, K.; Kalidas, S.; Jayamani, M.; Mausam, K.; Palanisamy, S.; Ma, Q.; Al-Farraj, S.A. Effect of Sal Wood and Babool Sawdust Fillers on the Mechanical Properties of Snake Grass Fiber-Reinforced Polyester Composites. BioResources 2025, 20, 8674–8694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bachtiar, D.; Mohammed, A.A.; Palanisamy, S.; Imran, A.I.; Siregar, J.P.; Rejab, M.R.b.M.; Syaubari, S.; Cionita, T.; Fitriyana, D.F.; Al-Farraj, S.A.; et al. Effect of alkaline treatment on the thermal and mechanical properties of sugar palm fibre reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane composites. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 14085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Salah, H.B.H.; Trad, O.; Trad, A.; Louhichi, B. Mechanical and microstructural evaluation of Palm, Alfa, and Luffa fibers as sustainable reinforcements in Bio-Composites: A comparative study under uniform processing. Polym. Bull. 2026, 83, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ansari, Z.; Rejab, M.R.M.; Bachtiar, D.; Siregar, J.P. Crushing response of green square honeycomb structure from sugar palm & PLA. Mater. Sci. Forum 2017, 909, 122–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ansari, Z.; Tan, C.W.; Rejab, M.R.M.; Bachtiar, D.; Siregar, J.; Zuhri, M.Y.M.; Marzuki, N.S.D.M. Crushing behaviour of composite square honeycomb structure: A finite element analysis. J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2017, 11, 2637–2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jose, S.; Shanumon, P.S.; Kadam, V.; Tom, M.; Thomas, S. Preparation, characterisation and application of biodegradable coarse wool-poly (lactic acid) sandwich composite. Polym. Bull. 2024, 81, 10293–10310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahasuwanchai, N.; Udtaranakron, T.; Chanto, K.; Pulngern, T. Behavior of Sandwich Glued Laminated Bamboo Structures with a Core Formed by Bioplastic Fiber Using 3D Printing Technology. J. Renew. Mater. 2025, 13, 2453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Q.; Rejab, M.R.M.; Kang, S.; Idris, M.S.; Zin, M.A.A.M. The energy-absorbing characteristics of single spherical-roof contoured-core (SRCC) cell with composite materials. Int. J. Automot. Mech. Eng. 2020, 17, 8265–8273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sapuan, S.M.; Mohammadsalih, Z.G.; Harussani, M.M.; Ibrahim, M.I.; Omar, A.A.; Fadill, N.F.M.; Shahrum, A.F.; Siddiqui, V.U. Review of biocomposite sandwich structures. In Biocomposites for Lightweight Sandwich Structures; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2024; pp. 10–30. [Google Scholar]
- Ainin, F.N.; Azaman, M.D.; Abdul Majid, M.S.; Ridzuan, M.J.M. Mechanical behavior, energy absorption, and failure mechanism of 3D-printed hexagonal honeycomb core under dynamic and quasi-static loadings. Polym. Compos. 2025, 46, 6346–6359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Idris, M.S.; Ma, Q.; Aziz, N.A.; Mohammed, A.A.; Zhang, B.; Rejab, M.R.M. 3D-printed honeycomb sandwich structures: Mechanical characterisation of biocomposite materials. In Biocomposites for Lightweight Sandwich Structures; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2024; pp. 31–45. [Google Scholar]
- Rejab, M.R.M.; Cantwell, W.J. The mechanical behaviour of corrugated-core sandwich panels. Compos. Part B Eng. 2013, 47, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Q.; Rejab, M.R.M.; Hassan, S.A.; Azeem, M.; Saffirna, M.S. Failure behavior analysis of the Spherical-Roof Contoured Core (SRCC) under quasi-static loading: A numerical study. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 2023, 23, 511–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ismail, M.; Rejab, M.R.M.; Siregar, J.P.; Mohamad, Z.; Quanjin, M.; Mohammed, A.A. Mechanical properties of hybrid glass fiber/rice husk reinforced polymer composite. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 27, 1749–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Q.; Rejab, M.R.M.; Alang, N.A.; Hanon, M.M.; Yang, B.; Hu, H.; Zhang, B. Crashworthiness performance of sandwich panel with self-reinforced polypropylene (SRPP) and carbon fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP) spherical-roof contoured cores. In Thin-Walled Composite Protective Structures for Crashworthiness Applications: Recent Advances and Future Developments; Springer: Singapore, 2023; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, S.; Wen, K.; Liu, Y.; Wu, C.; Du, X.; Liang, C.; Ma, Q.; Liu, Y. Optimised design, fabrication, and enhanced performance of honeycomb sandwich structure for excellent impact resistance and broadband microwave absorption. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2025, 681, 365–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]







| Type of Fibre | Fibre Weight Ratio (wt%) | PLA Weight Ratio (wt%) |
|---|---|---|
| Kenaf | 20 | 80 |
| Pineapple | 30 | 70 |
| Sugar palm | 30 | 70 |
| Composite Type | Poisson’s Ratio | Tensile Strength (MPa) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New | Recyclable | New | Recyclable | |
| Kenaf/PLA | 0.37 ± 0.03 | 0.26 ± 0.03 | 36.28 ± 3.05 | 19.72 ± 1.85 |
| Pineapple/PLA | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | 11.95 ± 1.44 | 10.38 ± 0.87 |
| Sugar palm/PLA | 0.38 ± 0.04 | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 17.70 ± 1.72 | 15.94 ± 1.74 |
| Composite Type | Maximum Compression Load (kN) | Maximum Stress (MPa) | Energy Absorption (kJ) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single Slot | Double Slots | Single Slot | Double Slots | Single Slot | Double Slots | |
| Kenaf/PLA | 17.23 ± 1.02 | 21.12 ± 1.69 | 7.80 ± 0.52 | 4.31 ± 0.31 | 0.64 ± 0.06 | 0.38 ± 0.03 |
| Pineapple/PLA | 13.40 ± 0.81 | 31.75 ± 2.86 | 6.06 ± 0.55 | 6.48 ± 0.45 | 0.68 ± 0.06 | 0.81 ± 0.04 |
| Sugar palm/PLA | 16.50 ± 1.42 | 23.86 ± 2.15 | 7.35 ± 0.44 | 4.87 ± 0.38 | 0.83 ± 0.08 | 0.45 ± 0.07 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Ma, Q.; Rejab, M.R.M.; Hadi, N.; Song, Y.; Palanisamy, S.; Ansari, Z. Energy Absorption Characteristics of Biodegradable and Recyclable Composite with Interlocking Periodic Honeycomb Sandwich Structure. Eng. Proc. 2026, 124, 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026124048
Ma Q, Rejab MRM, Hadi N, Song Y, Palanisamy S, Ansari Z. Energy Absorption Characteristics of Biodegradable and Recyclable Composite with Interlocking Periodic Honeycomb Sandwich Structure. Engineering Proceedings. 2026; 124(1):48. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026124048
Chicago/Turabian StyleMa, Quanjin, Mohd Ruzaimi Mat Rejab, Nasrul Hadi, Yiheng Song, Sivasubramanian Palanisamy, and Zahidah Ansari. 2026. "Energy Absorption Characteristics of Biodegradable and Recyclable Composite with Interlocking Periodic Honeycomb Sandwich Structure" Engineering Proceedings 124, no. 1: 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026124048
APA StyleMa, Q., Rejab, M. R. M., Hadi, N., Song, Y., Palanisamy, S., & Ansari, Z. (2026). Energy Absorption Characteristics of Biodegradable and Recyclable Composite with Interlocking Periodic Honeycomb Sandwich Structure. Engineering Proceedings, 124(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2026124048

