Next Article in Journal
A Comparative Analysis of Immunity-Inspired Cybersecurity Approaches
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Digital Tool Implementation in Building Operations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

The Use of Phytoremediation in the Treatment of Anthropogenically Impacted Soils †

by
Radmila Kučerová
*,
Ivona Sobková
,
Adéla Příhodová
,
Nikola Drahorádová
and
Mária Wagingerová
Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Mining and Geology, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, 17. listopadu 2172/15, 708 00 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 5th International Conference on Advances in Environmental Engineering, Ostrava, Czech Republic, 26–28 November 2025.
Eng. Proc. 2025, 116(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025116008
Published: 27 November 2025

Abstract

This study investigates the remediation of contaminated soil containing potentially toxic elements (PTEs) through phytoremediation. Cannabis sativa was selected as the model species due to its suitability for cultivation under Central and Northern European climatic conditions. The experiment was conducted over an eight-month period, during which no visible morphological deformities were observed, despite elevated concentrations of PTEs. Among the tested soil samples, the plant labeled No. 5 exhibited the highest remediation efficiency, removing approximately 11% of total zinc, nearly 75% of chromium, 36% of nickel, just under 9% of copper, and about 36% of arsenic from the soil.

1. Introduction

Soil contamination by potentially toxic elements (PTEs) poses a severe and long-term ecological threat, adversely impacting the environment, human health, and agricultural productivity. The accumulation of these contaminants in soil primarily results from intensive industrial activity, improper waste management, mineral extraction, fossil fuel combustion, and excessive use of agrochemicals. The most common PTEs include heavy metals such as lead, cadmium, mercury, arsenic, and zinc, which are characterized by their persistence, bioaccumulative nature, and high toxicity—even at low concentrations. Consequently, the remediation of contaminated soil is critical for restoring ecological balance and preventing further degradation, as the chemical stability of these elements enables them to disrupt soil microbiota, suppress plant growth, and bioaccumulate within food chains.
Conventional soil remediation techniques, including soil replacement, thermal decontamination, and chemical extraction, are technically demanding, costly, and often cause significant disturbance to the natural soil environment. Consequently, growing attention has been directed toward alternative, environmentally sustainable approaches, particularly phytoremediation—an innovative technique that utilizes specific plant species to absorb, accumulate, stabilize, or degrade contaminants directly within the soil matrix. Phytoremediation is less invasive and more cost-effective than conventional methods and simultaneously improves the soil’s physical properties and biological activity.
Cannabis sativa has recently attracted significant scientific interest owing to its rapid growth rate, resilience, and well-developed root system, which collectively enhance its capacity to accumulate heavy metals, particularly within root tissues. Moreover, Cannabis sativa exhibits a high tolerance to environmental stressors commonly encountered in contaminated sites. Due to its versatile biomass applications in the textile, construction, and energy industries, industrial hemp is increasingly regarded as a promising species for the phytoremediation of polluted soils and the restoration of degraded land.

2. Materials and Methods

Soil samples were collected from the site of a former large-scale metallurgical facility located in central Ostrava. Sample preparation followed the Czech technical standard based on international ISO standard (ČSN ISO) 11,464 (836160) standard, Soil Quality—Pretreatment of Samples for Physicochemical Analysis [1].
All analyses were conducted in the laboratories of the Department of Environmental Engineering at VSB–Technical University of Ostrava (VSB-TUO). Comprehensive characterization of the soil samples was performed using a wavelength-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (WD-XRF) spectrometer (S8 TIGER, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). We focused on the occurrence of risk elements (Zn, Cr, Ni, Cu, As, Pb). The analyses were performed using the flame method on a VARIAN AA 280FS instrument (AAS; Varian Australia Pty Ltd., Mulgrave, Victoria, Australia). AAS is a standard method of elemental analysis—therefore also suitable for the analysis of biomass after mineralization.
Digestion conditions: decomposition in an open system, weighing of approximately 0.5 g of dry sample, addition of 10 mL of concentrated HNO3 p.a., hot plate, decomposition time—until complete dissolution of biomass, i.e., approximately 20 min. Transfer to a 50 mL volumetric flask, top up to the mark—ready for analysis on AAS. The measured results are then converted back to the dry sample.
The experiment involved the cultivation of six Cannabis sativa plants, each grown individually in a separate pot. Seeds were placed on the top layer of homogenized mixed soil and subsequently covered with a 3–5 mm layer of the tested soil. Irrigation began immediately after planting and was repeated at two- to three-day intervals. The potted plants were maintained for eight months in the cannabis cultivation hall located in Ostrava–Kunčice. The entire experiment was thoroughly documented and continuously monitored, as illustrated in Figure 1.
Throughout the experiment, vegetative growth was systematically observed to identify the environmental conditions necessary for seed germination, establishment, and optimal plant development. The most substantial increase in biomass occurred between the third and fourth months, with all plants exhibiting a similar growth pattern.
The harvested plants were air-dried at room temperature for one week, as shown in Figure 2. The prepared test samples, each with an average weight of approximately 0.5 g, were digested in subboiled nitric acid produced by subboiling distillation. Complete digestion was achieved in all cases. The resulting digests were subsequently filtered into flasks and stored for further analysis.

3. Results

The concentrations of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in the sub-root soil were analyzed four months after planting (samples 1–6). After eight months, leaf samples were examined using atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) to determine the levels of PTEs accumulated in plant tissues.
The results show that, four months after planting, the concentrations of metals in the subsoil had decreased in most samples, as presented in Table 1.
As illustrated in Figure 3, sample 5 demonstrated the highest overall remediation efficiency, exhibiting the greatest reduction in the total concentrations of the analyzed elements in the soil. Specifically, the following percentages of metals were removed during the experiment: 11.11% zinc, 74.87% chromium, 36.11% nickel, 8.7% copper, and 35.71% arsenic.
To further examine the accumulation of risk elements in leaves [2,3,4], a fourth plant was left to decompose for an additional four months. Subsequently, biomass decomposition was analyzed using flame spectrometry with a measurement uncertainty of 20%.
As illustrated in Table 2, the risk elements (g/t) present in the herbal stack are indicated. The analysis revealed the presence of zinc, copper, and lead within the leaf, as illustrated in Figure 4. The sorption of pollutants exhibited no significant variation across the entire sample of plants. The most optimal outcomes were achieved in plant 2. In this instance, 55 g/t zinc and 14 g/t copper were transferred to the leaves.

4. Discussion

Cannabis sativa showed strong potential for use in the phytoremediation of soils contaminated with potentially toxic elements (PTEs). Its fast growth, large biomass yield, and resilience to environmental stress make it an appealing candidate for ecological restoration, especially in temperate regions. In this study, Cannabis sativa effectively absorbed and accumulated several heavy metals from contaminated soil, leading to a measurable decline in their concentrations.
Over the course of four months, Cannabis sativa reduced soil concentrations of zinc by 4.74%, chromium by 56.28%, nickel by 35.19%, copper by 1.7%, arsenic by 35.71%, and lead by 43.17%. These results indicate that the species can tolerate high metal loads without visible signs of stress, supporting its potential role as a low-cost, environmentally friendly solution for soil remediation and land restoration.
Copper, zinc, and lead were clearly detected in the leaf tissues, while nickel, chromium, and arsenic were present only at negligible concentrations. However, post-phytoremediation analyses of the soil revealed a marked decrease in these elements, indicating that the potentially toxic elements were primarily absorbed and stored in other plant organs, such as the roots or stems. This pattern suggests that Cannabis sativa effectively accumulates metals below ground, minimizing translocation to aboveground biomass.
The findings demonstrate that all parts of the Cannabis sativa plant become contaminated with toxic metals following phytoremediation. Consequently, the potential use of this biomass for commercial purposes is restricted due to contamination concerns.
No visible deformation was detected during the experiment, which could result from a higher concentration of toxic metals.

5. Conclusions

This study explored the use of phytoremediation to treat contaminated soil—a method that, while often less efficient than physical or chemical approaches, provides a more sustainable and cost-effective option for environmental recovery. The results indicate that industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa) effectively removed potentially toxic elements from the soil under the experimental conditions, demonstrating its promise as a practical tool for ecological restoration.
The use of Cannabis sativa for remediating contaminated soils continues to be an active and evolving area of research. Current findings underscore its strong potential for contributing to ecological restoration efforts. Future work should aim to optimize growth conditions and establish safe, sustainable strategies for managing and utilizing the resulting biomass.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.K. and I.S.; methodology, I.S.; software, M.W.; validation, R.K., I.S. and A.P.; formal analysis, N.D.; investigation, M.W.; resources, I.S.; data curation, M.W.; writing—original draft preparation, I.S.; writing—review and editing, R.K.; visualization, R.K.; supervision, A.P.; project administration, N.D.; funding acquisition, A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Grant of SGS No. SP2023/051, Faculty of Mining and Geology, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting the published results can be found in the dissertation on the topic of The use of flotation and phytoremediation in the treatment of anthropogenically impacted soils. Author Ivona Sobková, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 2022. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10084/151395 (accessed on 2 June 2025).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AASAtomic absorption spectrometry
ČSN ISOCzech technical standard based on international ISO standard
m. u.Measurement uncertainty
No.Number
P. no.Plant number
PTEsPotentially toxic elements
SGSStudent grant competition
VSB-TUOVSB-Technical University of Ostrava
WD XRFWavelength Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence

References

  1. ČSN ISO 11464; Soil Quality—Preparation of Samples for Physico-Chemical Analyses. Czech Standards Institute: Prague, Czech Republic, 2011.
  2. Linger, P.; Müssig, J.; Fischer, H.; Kobert, J. Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) growing on heavy metal contaminated soil: Fibre quality and phytoremediation potential. Ind. Crops Prod. 2002, 16, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kožušník, A. Možnosti Využití Fytoremediace na Kontaminovaném Území Bývalého Podniku DEZA—LAHOS v Ostravě Pomocí Cannabis Sativa. Master’s Thesis, Vysoká Škola Báňská—Technická Univerzita Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  4. Arru, L.; Rognoni, S.; Baroncini, M.; Bonatti, P.M.; Perata, P. Copper localization in Cannabis sativa L. grown in a copper-rich solution. Euphytica 2004, 140, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cannabis sativa 14 weeks after sowing.
Figure 1. Cannabis sativa 14 weeks after sowing.
Engproc 116 00008 g001
Figure 2. Dried biomass.
Figure 2. Dried biomass.
Engproc 116 00008 g002
Figure 3. Concentrations of the analyzed elements in the soil samples.
Figure 3. Concentrations of the analyzed elements in the soil samples.
Engproc 116 00008 g003
Figure 4. Concentration of potentially toxic elements in leaves.
Figure 4. Concentration of potentially toxic elements in leaves.
Engproc 116 00008 g004
Table 1. Concentration of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in soil 4 months after planting.
Table 1. Concentration of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in soil 4 months after planting.
PTEsConcentration of Potentially Toxic Elements (PTEs), g/t, m. u. 20%
EntrySample 1Sample 2Sample 3Sample 4Sample 5Sample 6
Zn 144131137143140128144
Cr 398308129108169100230
Ni 36251729232323
Cu 232323-232123
As 1489107911
Pb 83444463414348
Table 2. Accumulation of risk elements in leaves.
Table 2. Accumulation of risk elements in leaves.
P. no.CrNiZnCuPb
g/t, m. u. 20%
1<1<144134
2<1<15514<1
3<1<153122
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kučerová, R.; Sobková, I.; Příhodová, A.; Drahorádová, N.; Wagingerová, M. The Use of Phytoremediation in the Treatment of Anthropogenically Impacted Soils. Eng. Proc. 2025, 116, 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025116008

AMA Style

Kučerová R, Sobková I, Příhodová A, Drahorádová N, Wagingerová M. The Use of Phytoremediation in the Treatment of Anthropogenically Impacted Soils. Engineering Proceedings. 2025; 116(1):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025116008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kučerová, Radmila, Ivona Sobková, Adéla Příhodová, Nikola Drahorádová, and Mária Wagingerová. 2025. "The Use of Phytoremediation in the Treatment of Anthropogenically Impacted Soils" Engineering Proceedings 116, no. 1: 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025116008

APA Style

Kučerová, R., Sobková, I., Příhodová, A., Drahorádová, N., & Wagingerová, M. (2025). The Use of Phytoremediation in the Treatment of Anthropogenically Impacted Soils. Engineering Proceedings, 116(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025116008

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop