Next Article in Journal
Metabolic Syndrome, Hepatic Steatosis and Testosterone: A Matter of Sex
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Hypoalbuminemia on Outcomes Following Hepatic Resection: A NSQIP Retrospective Cohort Analysis of 26,394 Patients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Novel Bile Duct-Saving Portal Ligation Technique for Subtotal Hepatectomy Survival Operations in Rats

1
School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
2
Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
3
College of Humanities and Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23220, USA
4
Department of Transplant Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA 23219, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Livers 2024, 4(4), 521-533; https://doi.org/10.3390/livers4040037
Submission received: 28 August 2024 / Revised: 8 October 2024 / Accepted: 9 October 2024 / Published: 15 October 2024

Abstract

:
Background: Creating a model for acute liver failure in animal models is essential for research on liver regeneration and cancer. Current surgical techniques allow for a maximum of 80% partial hepatectomy in rats, with low survival rates due to poor inflow control. The common resection technique involves ligation at the liver lobe neck, causing peri-operative blood loss and postoperative blood loss. Methods: A 90% partial hepatectomy was performed on 5 rats using a bile duct-saving portal ligation technique, involving two hilum dissections for bile duct preservation. The first dissection controlled the blood supply to the median and left lateral lobes, and the second to the right inferior and superior lobes. Before closing, all rats were given 5 mL of 10% dextrose intraperitoneally and had access to ClearH2O DietGel Recovery and 20% dextrose. Weight and behavior were closely monitored for seven days post-operatively. Results: This method resulted in 100% survival, with a 3.1% increase in liver mass and 12.3% increase in liver-to-body mass ratio. Conclusions: This technique is the first bile duct-saving portal ligation for rodent models of acute liver failure, with long-term survival and complete hepatic regeneration. Our procedure offers a viable 90% hepatectomy model for research with improved survival and regeneration outcomes.

1. Background

The liver possesses the unique property of being able to regenerate organ-specific cells to maintain homeostatic function [1,2,3,4]. Unlike true regenerative mechanisms, liver regeneration functions by increasing the size of remaining liver structures to meet biological needs rather than obtaining the original gross anatomical structure [2]. Conversely, enlarged liver mass is corrected by apoptosis [3]. While other solid organs adjust to tissue loss without reaching original homeostatic levels, the regenerative and apoptotic properties of the liver allow it to reach 100% of what is required for homeostasis [1]. This regenerative capacity has been demonstrated in both human and animal studies, highlighting the liver’s distinct mechanisms [1,2,3,4].
The mechanisms of liver regeneration have been thoroughly studied in the past. Liver regeneration is a complex process which involves various cell types and intercellular interactions mediated by various growth factors [5,6,7,8,9]. While in vitro human studies, created by culturing isolated hepatocytes, are beneficial by minimizing the effect of confounding variables, the complex process of liver regeneration requires consideration of these variables in in vivo animal models.
In the past, various strategies were explored to encourage the regeneration of the first stage liver prior to performing extended liver resection in the second stage. It was found in human studies that the regeneration of the first stage liver is promoted by causing controlled damage to the future resected liver lobe (FRL). This restoration of volume and function of the first stage liver improves the tolerance to the subsequent major hepatectomy performed as a second stage operation. Portal vein occlusion techniques, including portal vein embolization (PVE) and portal vein ligation (PVL), were initially established to improve resectability. However, these techniques failed to induce sufficient hypertrophy or prevent tumor growth progression [10].
Thus, the two-stage hepatectomy, a procedure that consists of two sequential liver resections to clear all tumors located in the FLR (the left lobe) followed by PVE of the right lobe combined with portal vein occlusion, was introduced. Performing a small additional resection (20%PHx) did not fully prevent atrophy of the ligated liver lobe. However, by performing a large additional resection (70%PHx), there was an induction of proliferation, a down-regulation of apoptosis, and an up-regulation of autophagy in the ligated lobe. This combined procedure induced more hepatocyte proliferation and a faster course of liver hypertrophy in the FLR than after PVL alone, as simultaneous PVL and PHx was found to be a well-tolerated procedure even when reducing the size of the healthy FLR to only 10% of the original liver mass. Additional PHx was found to not only promote regeneration of the FLR but also reduce the tumor load in the first step, thereby preventing the increase of the tumor burden during the waiting period [10].
However, despite improved outcomes following major hepatectomy, major vascular invasion has led to subsequent higher risks for increased intraoperative blood loss, which was also identified as an independent predictor of early postoperative mortality [11]. Thus, the Pringle maneuver (PM) was introduced as a common and evidence-based method of hepatic inflow control, as it was found to decrease intraoperative blood loss, the amount of blood products transfused, and operation time. However, an associative risk with the PM procedure is an ischemia-reperfusion injury of the liver, which negatively affects hepatocyte metabolism and increases the rate of posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). Furthermore, there have been limited studies on the effects of the PM on intra-and postoperative outcomes in extended hepatectomy which has a higher risk of intraoperative bleeding than minor hepatectomies [12].
Therefore, the objective of this study is to evaluate a novel bile duct-saving portal ligation technique for performing a 90% subtotal hepatectomy in rats, focusing on minimizing intraoperative blood loss and promoting liver regeneration during the immediate postoperative period, without the need for preoperative liver hypertrophy induction techniques. By combining previous techniques, this approach aims to minimize blood loss and enhance liver regeneration. This could potentially make it a more efficient and safer alternative to multi-stage procedures for substantial liver resection in HCC cases. Additionally, our technique has potential benefits for cases requiring repeated liver resections involving substantial tissue excision or patients with compromised liver function. In such cases, preservation of biliary function, minimizing blood loss, and reducing the risk of liver ischemia-reperfusion injury are critical for improving patient outcomes. In living donor liver transplantations, performing subtotal hepatectomies while ensuring sufficient regeneration and decreasing postoperative complications could contribute to optimizing donor hepatic function and expanding the pool of eligible donors. Ultimately, our technique may improve patient outcomes by reducing complications traditionally associated with hepatectomy procedures, such as increased bile leaks and higher morbidity, increasing patient safety.

2. Methods

2.1. Preoperative Preparation

One hour prior to operation, the rat is administered a dose of Buprenorphine HCl-ER analgesic at 1.0 mg/kg injected subcutaneously and an inhaled isoflurane anesthetic, inducted at 4% and maintained at 2%. Immediately before operation, the stomach area of the rat is shaved and wiped with chlorhexidine and 70% ethanol twice.

2.2. Obtaining Intraperitoneal Access and Mobilizing the Liver

A midline incision is made on the skin to expose the muscle layer. The incision is about 3 cm long and starts at the xiphoid process. A small incision is then made to gain access to the peritoneal cavity. Taking care to ensure that the animal’s internal organs are not at risk of being cut, a midline incision is made on the muscle layer to gain complete access to the peritoneal cavity. The cavity is held open with a retractor. Figure 1 demonstrates the opening of the skin and muscle layer separately to expose the liver.
Suspending ligaments were cut to mobilize the liver and allow for resection of liver lobes. The ligaments include: the falciform ligament attaching the median lobe to the diaphragm (Figure 2), the left triangular ligament connecting the left lateral lobe to the diaphragm, the interlobar ligament connecting the left lateral lobe to the superior caudate lobe, and the right triangular ligament connecting the superior right lateral lobe to the diaphragm. Figure 3 depicts the resection of these four ligaments.

2.3. Bile Duct-Saving Portal Ligation via Hilum Dissection

The medial and left lateral lobes are lifted to expose the hilum (Figure 4). Using a Leica Wilde M651 surgical microscope (Leica Microsystems, Bensheim, Germany) at 20 × power magnification, visual access is focused on the portion of the hilum that supplies the median and left lateral lobes. The membrane between the bile duct and hepatic artery is punctured using a curved jaw micro needle holder, and 4-0 silk thread is pulled through the separation. The membrane between the portal vein and inferior vena cava is then punctured using a curved jaw micro needle holder, and one end of the 4-0 silk thread is pulled through the separation. As a result, the thread holds the hepatic artery and portal vein that supplies the median and left lateral lobes. The hepatic artery and portal vein are ligated, which stops all inflow to those lobes. Visual confirmation of successful ligation can be obtained through a color change in the lobes from bright pink to brown. Figure 5 depicts each stop of this hilum dissection and ligation.
A second dissection of the hilum is required to control the inflow to the right superior and right inferior lobes. The branch of the hilum that supplies the right lateral lobe is isolated. Similar to the initial dissection, the membrane separating the bile duct and hepatic artery is penetrated with curved jaw micro needle holders, and 4-0 silk thread is passed through. One end of the thread is placed through the membrane between the portal vein and inferior vena cava, so the thread only holds the portal vein and hepatic artery. The portal vein and hepatic artery are ligated with 4-0 silk thread, and visual confirmation of successful ligation can be seen by a color change in the right superior and right inferior lobes. Figure 6 depicts the steps of this portal ligation.

2.4. Ligation and Resection of Liver Lobes

A 4-0 silk thread is placed around the neck of the lateral lobe using microdissection forceps and a curved jaw micro needle holder. The thread is tied and the left lateral lobe is cut using curved jaw micro dissecting scissors distal to the tie, leaving a small stump of the left lateral lobe. Figure 7 depicts ligation of the left lateral lobe and the remaining stump.
A curved jaw micro needle holder is passed between the right and left portions of the median lobe starting from the dorsal side of the lobe about 5 mm above the neck of the median lobe. Using a curved jaw micro needle holder, 2 4-0 silk threads are passed between the right and left portions of the median lobe, and each portion is ligated separately. The median lobe is cut using curved jaw micro dissecting scissors, leaving a small stump of the median lobe. Figure 8 depicts ligation and the remaining stump of the median lobe after resection.
The right inferior lobe is resected by placing a 4-0 silk tie around the neck using microdissecting forceps and a curved jaw micro needle holder. The lobe is ligated and cut using curved jaw microdissecting scissors, leaving a small stump. The right superior lobe is resected using the same method. Figure 9 depicts the ligation and remaining stumps of the right inferior and superior lobes.

2.5. Closing and Post-Operational Care

Prior to closing, the rat is given 5 mL of 10% glucose solution intraperitoneally. The muscle layer is closed with a simple continuous suture using 4-0 vicryl. The skin layer is closed with a running subcuticular suture using 5-0 monocryl to avoid the animal ripping out its sutures during the post-operative period.
The rat is placed in a cage with ClearH2O DietGel Recovery(ClearH2O, Westbrook, ME, USA), a gel-based formula for hydration and nutrients sourced from the company ClearH2O, and an ad libitum 20% dextrose solution. The DietGel Recovery and dextrose solution are replaced every other day during the post-operative period until the rat is sacrificed. A total of 72 h after the operation, if the rat is showing any symptoms of pain, it is administered a second dose of Buprenorphine HCl-ER at 0.5 mg/kg. The rats’ weight and behavior are closely monitored during the week-long period of survival. Rats which experience significant losses in weight or show signs of fatigue are provided 5–10 mL of normal saline or lactate ringer solution as needed.

2.6. Experimental Design

Five Sprague–Dawley male rats, sourced from Charles River laboratories, were used, all being between 300 g–400 g at the time of the operation. The mass of resected liver tissue was weighed and total liver mass was estimated using Equation (1) where mass of the resected liver (MR) is divided by 0.9 to estimate the total pre-surgical liver mass (MT). All five rats were monitored daily for the seven-day post-surgical period to adjust post-op care as necessary. Additionally, the mass of each rat was weighed for the first three days of the post-operative period. Following the seven-day period, all rats were euthanized and sacrificed for blood and liver samples. The total remaining liver was harvested and weighed. Figure 10 depicts the explanted liver after sacrifice on postoperative day 7.

3. Results

3.1. Results after Hepatectomy Procedure

The 90% hepatectomy procedure resulted in 100% survival for all five animals that underwent the procedure. All animals demonstrated decreased activity for one to two days post-operation. However, with weight gain and nutrition supplementation, all animals began normal activity and behavior about three days post-operation.

3.2. Assessment of Liver Regeneration in Terms of Weight Gain

Total animal mass for all five animals is shown in Table 1. Each animal experienced total weight loss over the course of the week-long post-operation period. The average weight loss for all five rats was 9.4%. The smallest loss in weight was 7.3%, while the largest weight decrease was 12.2%.
The mass of the resected liver segments, estimated pre-operative liver mass, and final liver mass after the 7-day post-operative period can be found in Table 2. The percent change between estimated total pre-operative liver mass and final mass was calculated (Δest). The average percent change was an increase of 3.1%. The change in liver mass reported as a percent of total body mass is represented for each animal in Figure 11.

4. Discussion

This study demonstrated a novel surgical technique to perform subtotal hepatectomy procedures on rats, with minimal complications and acceptable early survival outcomes. The bile duct-saving portal ligation technique involves a microsurgery technique to dissect the hilum twice. The first hilum dissection inhibits the blood supply to the entire median and left lateral lobes. The second hilum dissection inhibits blood supply to superior and inferior right lateral lobes. Following the ligation and resection of the lobes, only the superior and inferior caudate lobes remain, which account for 10% of the original liver volume. This novel technique was performed on five rats to confirm safety and efficacy. All five rats survived and demonstrated significant liver regeneration within the 7-day post-operative period.
Current models of liver resection in rats involve the immediate ligation and resection of the liver lobes at the neck of each lobe [13]. A more refined technique involves the use of a Pringle’s maneuver to temporarily stop the inflow to specific lobes [14]. Using both of these techniques, the stubs of the resected lobes still receive blood supply, which leads to postoperative blood loss. Additionally, in the former, continuous inflow to the lobes leads to significant perioperative blood loss. When mass ligation is placed at the base of the lobes, resection further carries the risk of constriction of the vena cava. Utilizing the novel technique described in this study eliminates this concern by permanently stopping blood flow into the lobes prior to resection and distal resection of liver lobes from the site of ligation. The benefit of this is twofold, first, that perioperative blood loss is minimized, and second, that blood flow to the remaining stubs is stopped with prevention of vena cava constriction. Ultimately this contributes to less blood loss, improved survival rates, and the ability to perform more subtotal hepatectomies.
Complete hilum ligation is not a feasible surgical alternative, as blockage of the bile duct can lead to biloma. Therefore, dissection of the hilum to preserve the bile duct is essential for higher acuity resections such as those performed in this study. By preserving the bile duct and selectively ligating the portal vein and hepatic artery, this technique minimizes the risks of postoperative complications associated with bile duct obstruction and ensures greater safety and efficacy of the procedure [15]. Ligation of the bile duct can also induce liver fibrosis and acute obstructive jaundice with progression to cirrhosis with portal fibrosis. Bile duct ligation induces an increase in the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and a subsequent depletion of Küpffer cells, further increasing development of liver fibrosis and potential liver failure [16].
However, through ligation of both the portal vein and hepatic artery, there is a redistribution of arterial and portal circulation, creating an optimal environment for liver remnant hypertrophy. In prior studies, the rate of hepatic regeneration increases when both the portal vein and hepatic artery are ligated compared to only the portal vein [17]. Additionally, ligation of both vessels enhances the release of inflammatory cytokines associated with superior hepatic regeneration. Subsequently, there is a rapid rise in portal venous pressure and arterial hyperperfusion in the remaining non-ligated liver lobes, playing a crucial role in stimulating liver growth via compensatory hypertrophy and highlighting the inherent regenerative capacity of the liver. Acute portal hypertension serves as a key initiator in post-resection liver regeneration and is driven by a rapid reduction in the volume of the intrahepatic portal bed from liver excision [18].
This study demonstrated that complete liver regeneration can occur in 90% hepatectomy models of rats after a 7-day postoperative period. The average change in liver mass was an increase of 3.1%, with the changes in liver mass ranging from −4.2% to +8.1%. Furthermore, despite the estimated decrease in liver mass that three animals experienced, every animal demonstrated an increase in liver mass relative to their total body mass. One week after 90% hepatectomy, the liver recovered more than 95% of its original mass on average. Therefore, this study demonstrates the effectiveness of a novel bile duct-saving portal ligation technique for subtotal hepatectomy survival procedures on rats. Through dissecting the hilum and selective ligation of the portal vein and hepatic artery, this approach provides more precise control over blood flow to target liver lobes, minimizing perioperative blood loss and postoperative complications. The successful outcomes, 100% survival, and significant liver regeneration within the 7-day postoperative period demonstrate the use of this technique as a potential tool for hepatic surgery.

4.1. Limitations

Limitations of the novel bile duct-saving portal ligation technique discussed within this paper include its challenging surgical nature within clinical settings, requiring significant practice and having a steep learning curve. Performing the delicate dissections of the hilum and the ligations of the portal vein and hepatic artery without disruption of the bile duct demands precise microsurgical skill, limiting its widespread adoption without proper training and experience. Furthermore, variability in the anatomy of the hepatic vasculature among individual rats can pose challenges during surgery and impact overall success rates of the procedure. Specifically, the differences in branching patterns of the portal vein and hepatic artery that can occur among subjects require intraoperative adjustments, which may contribute to inconsistent outcomes [19]. Additionally, the rats in this animal model were healthy and lacked any underlying liver diseases, such as cirrhosis, commonly seen in clinical patients. The absence of such pathological conditions may limit the model’s applicability when translating its findings to human cases, where disease can alter both hepatic vasculature and procedural outcomes.

4.2. Future Directions

Inclusion of earlier sacrifice dates to measure the rate of liver growth during the postoperative period is one avenue of exploration for future studies. With a larger sample size, sacrificing rats at various time points following surgery can provide insight into the molecular kinetics of liver regeneration for the better understanding of the early phases of hepatic tissue regeneration. The effectiveness of administering growth factors through the inferior vena cava is another potential avenue for evaluating the stimulation of hepatocyte proliferation and angiogenesis within the process of liver regeneration. Through delivery of growth factors, such as hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), future studies can evaluate methods to accelerate liver regeneration and shorten recovery times, highlighting therapeutic potential within clinical settings where patients are undergoing acute partial hepatectomies.

5. Conclusions

The novel approach of employing a bile duct-saving portal ligation technique for 90% partial hepatectomy in rodent models has demonstrated a high survival rate. The technique achieved 100% survival over a 7-day post-operative period, along with substantial hepatic regeneration and an increased liver to body mass ratio. This surgical technique can be used to create a controlled and consistent model of acute liver failure and liver regeneration in rat models. This technique overcomes the limitations of previous subtotal hepatectomy surgical methods. Employing the technique has a significant learning curve but can be performed consistently by an experienced surgeon. Overall, the successful implementation of the bile duct-saving portal ligation technique represents a significant milestone in animal modeling of acute liver failure, offering new avenues for further research and therapeutic development.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.S. and S.D.L.; investigation, K.S. and A.A.; writing, K.S., A.A., E.J. and A.P.; all authors participated in review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received funding from the Virginia Commonwealth Department of Surgery.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Virginia Commonwealth University (Protocol Code: AD10002367; approved on 21 September 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Virginia Commonwealth University Department of Surgery for their valuable support and contributions to this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no financial or non-financial competing interests.

List of Abbreviations

FRLfuture resected lobe
PVEportal vein embolization
PVLportal vein ligation
PMPringle maneuver
PHLFpost hepatectomy liver failure
HCChepatocellular carcinoma
MTtotal pre-surgical liver mass
MRmass of resected liver
HGFhepatocyte growth factor
VEGFvascular endothelial growth factor

References

  1. Michalopoulos, G.K.; Bhushan, B. Liver regeneration: Biological and pathological mechanisms and implications. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 18, 40–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mao, S.A.; Glorioso, J.M.; Nyberg, S.L. Liver Regeneration. Transl. Res. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 2014, 163, 352–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fausto, N. Liver regeneration. J. Hepatol. 2000, 32, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fausto, N.; Campbell, J.S.; Riehle, K.J. Liver Regeneration. Hepatology 2006, 43, S45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fujiyoshi, M.; Ozaki, M. Molecular mechanisms of liver regeneration and protection for treatment of liver dysfunction and diseases. J. Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat. Sci. 2011, 18, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gilgenkrantz, H.; Collin de l’Hortet, A. Understanding Liver Regeneration: From Mechanisms to Regenerative Medicine. Am. J. Pathol. 2018, 188, 1316–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Verma, S.; Purohit, J.S.; Arora, A.; Sinha, S.; Chaturvedi, M.M. Liver regeneration: Metabolic and epigenetic regulation. Hepatoma Res. 2021, 7, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Huang, R.; Zhang, X.; Gracia-Sancho, J.; Xie, W.-F. Liver regeneration: Cellular origin and molecular mechanisms. Liver Int. 2022, 42, 1486–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Qi, J.; Dai, Y.; Sun, X.; Liu, C. Mechanism of liver regeneration: 20-year bibliometric analyses. Front. Pharmacol. 2023, 14, 1190559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hua, C.; Wei, W.; Zhang, T.; Xu, F.; Dirsch, O.; Homeyer, A.; Settmacher, U.; Dahmen, U. Additional partial hepatectomy at the time of portal vein ligation accelerates the regeneration of the future liver remnant. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 11740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Andreou, A.; Vauthey, J.-N.; Cherqui, D.; Zimmitti, G.; Ribero, D.; Truty, M.J.; Wei, S.H.; Curley, S.A.; Laurent, A.; Poon, R.T.; et al. Improved Long-Term Survival after Major Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Analysis Based on a New Definition of Major Hepatectomy. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2013, 17, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Al-Saeedi, M.; Ghamarnejad, O.; Khajeh, E.; Shafiei, S.; Salehpour, R.; Golriz, M.; Mieth, M.; Weiss, K.H.; Longerich, T.; Hoffmann, K.; et al. Pringle Maneuver in Extended Liver Resection: A propensity score analysis. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 8847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Martins PN, A.; Theruvath, T.P.; Neuhaus, P. Rodent models of partial hepatectomies. Liver Int. 2008, 28, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kong, Z.; Hu, J.; Ge, X.; Pan, K.; Li, C.; Dong, J. Preserving hepatic artery flow during portal triad blood occlusion improves regeneration of the remnant liver in rats with obstructive jaundice following partial hepatectomy. Exp. Ther. Med. 2018, 16, 1910–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Janel, N.; Noll, C. Chapter 51—Protection and Reversal of Hepatic Fibrosis by Polyphenols. In Polyphenols in Human Health and Disease; Watson, R.R., Preedy, V.R., Zibadi, S., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2014; pp. 665–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ertor, B.; Topaloglu, S.; Calik, A.; Cobanoglu, U.; Ahmetoglu, A.; Ak, H.; Karabulut, E.; Arslan, M.K. The Effects of Bile Duct Obstruction on Liver Volume: An Experimental Study. ISRN Surg. 2013, 2013, 156347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yao, L.-B.; Li, C.-H.; Wu, X.-J.; Wang, X.-D.; Ge, X.-L.; Zhang, A.-Q.; Zhu, X.-C.; Shao, Y.; Dong, J.-H. In situ splitting after selective partial portal vein ligation or simultaneous hepatic artery ligation promotes liver regeneration. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Tsomaia, K.; Patarashvili, L.; Karumidze, N.; Bebiashvili, I.; Az-Maipharashvili, E.; Modebadze, I.; Dzidziguri, D.; Sareli, M.; Gusev, S.; Kordzaia, D. Liver structural transformation after partial hepatectomy and repeated partial hepatectomy in rats: A renewed view on liver regeneration. World J. Gastroenterol. 2020, 26, 3899–3916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Sänger, C.; Schenk, A.; Schwen, L.O.; Wang, L.; Gremse, F.; Zafarnia, S.; Kiessling, F.; Xie, C.; Wei, W.; Richter, B.; et al. Intrahepatic Vascular Anatomy in Rats and Mice--Variations and Surgical Implications. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A). Midline incision through the skin layer to expose the muscle layer. (B). Midline incision through the muscle layer to expose the peritoneal cavity. The xiphoid process is visible at the top of the cavity.
Figure 1. (A). Midline incision through the skin layer to expose the muscle layer. (B). Midline incision through the muscle layer to expose the peritoneal cavity. The xiphoid process is visible at the top of the cavity.
Livers 04 00037 g001
Figure 2. Falciform ligament suspending the medial lobe to the diaphragm.
Figure 2. Falciform ligament suspending the medial lobe to the diaphragm.
Livers 04 00037 g002
Figure 3. (A) Resection of the falciform ligament. (B) Resection of the intralobar ligament connecting the left lateral lobe and superior caudate lobe. (C) Resection of the left triangular ligament connecting the left lateral lobe to the diaphragm. (D) Resection of the right triangular ligament connecting the superior right lateral lobe to the diaphragm.
Figure 3. (A) Resection of the falciform ligament. (B) Resection of the intralobar ligament connecting the left lateral lobe and superior caudate lobe. (C) Resection of the left triangular ligament connecting the left lateral lobe to the diaphragm. (D) Resection of the right triangular ligament connecting the superior right lateral lobe to the diaphragm.
Livers 04 00037 g003
Figure 4. Exposed hilum of the animal. Visual access was acquired by lifting the median and left lateral lobes against the visceral peritoneum.
Figure 4. Exposed hilum of the animal. Visual access was acquired by lifting the median and left lateral lobes against the visceral peritoneum.
Livers 04 00037 g004
Figure 5. (A) Isolating the portion of the hilum that supplies the median lobe and left lateral lobe, a thread is passed between the bile duct and hepatic artery. (B) One end of the thread is passed between the portal vein and inferior vena cava, so the thread holds the hepatic artery and portal vein that supply the median and left lateral lobes. (C) Ligation of the portal vein and hepatic artery. (D) Visual confirmation of successful ligation as seen by color change in the median and left lateral lobes.
Figure 5. (A) Isolating the portion of the hilum that supplies the median lobe and left lateral lobe, a thread is passed between the bile duct and hepatic artery. (B) One end of the thread is passed between the portal vein and inferior vena cava, so the thread holds the hepatic artery and portal vein that supply the median and left lateral lobes. (C) Ligation of the portal vein and hepatic artery. (D) Visual confirmation of successful ligation as seen by color change in the median and left lateral lobes.
Livers 04 00037 g005
Figure 6. (A) 4-0 silk thread is passed between the bile duct and hepatic artery on the portion of the hilum that supplies the right lateral lobes. (B) One end of the thread is passed between the portal vein and inferior vena cava, so the thread holds the hepatic artery and portal vein. (C) The portal vein and hepatic artery are ligated. Visual confirmation of successful ligation is seen by the color change in the right superior and right inferior lobes.
Figure 6. (A) 4-0 silk thread is passed between the bile duct and hepatic artery on the portion of the hilum that supplies the right lateral lobes. (B) One end of the thread is passed between the portal vein and inferior vena cava, so the thread holds the hepatic artery and portal vein. (C) The portal vein and hepatic artery are ligated. Visual confirmation of successful ligation is seen by the color change in the right superior and right inferior lobes.
Livers 04 00037 g006
Figure 7. (A) Ligation of the left lateral lobe. (B) Remaining stump of the left lateral lobe after resection.
Figure 7. (A) Ligation of the left lateral lobe. (B) Remaining stump of the left lateral lobe after resection.
Livers 04 00037 g007
Figure 8. (A) Passing a curved jaw micro needle holder between the right and left portions of the median lobe dorsally to ventrally. (B) A 4-0 silk thread is passed between the right and left lobes of the median lobes to ligate both portions of the lobe separately. (C) Remaining stump of the median lobe following ligation and resection.
Figure 8. (A) Passing a curved jaw micro needle holder between the right and left portions of the median lobe dorsally to ventrally. (B) A 4-0 silk thread is passed between the right and left lobes of the median lobes to ligate both portions of the lobe separately. (C) Remaining stump of the median lobe following ligation and resection.
Livers 04 00037 g008
Figure 9. (A) Ligation of the right inferior lobe. (B) Remaining stump of the right inferior lobe. (C) Ligation of the right superior lobe. (D) Remaining stump of the right superior lobe.
Figure 9. (A) Ligation of the right inferior lobe. (B) Remaining stump of the right inferior lobe. (C) Ligation of the right superior lobe. (D) Remaining stump of the right superior lobe.
Livers 04 00037 g009
Figure 10. Explanted Inferior and Superior Caudate Lobe after sacrifice on postoperative day 7.
Figure 10. Explanted Inferior and Superior Caudate Lobe after sacrifice on postoperative day 7.
Livers 04 00037 g010
Figure 11. Change in liver mass represented as a percent of total body mass.
Figure 11. Change in liver mass represented as a percent of total body mass.
Livers 04 00037 g011
Table 1. Change in mass for each animal for the one-week post-operation period.
Table 1. Change in mass for each animal for the one-week post-operation period.
Animal #Pre-op Mass (g)Final Mass (g)Δ (%)
1586520−11.3
2496460−7.3
3358329−8.1
4353310−12.2
5473434−8.2
Average420410.6−9.4
Table 2. Change in liver mass for each animal for the one-week post-operative period.
Table 2. Change in liver mass for each animal for the one-week post-operative period.
Animal #Resected Mass (g)Estimated Pre-Op Total (g)Final Mass (g)Δest (%)
11516.716−4.2
21213.313−2.3
31011.1128.1
41011.1128.1
51112.212−1.6
Average11.612.9133.1
Δest—Percent change between estimated pre-operation total liver mass and final liver mass.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Savsani, K.; Alfonso, A.; Jo, E.; Park, A.; Lee, S.D. A Novel Bile Duct-Saving Portal Ligation Technique for Subtotal Hepatectomy Survival Operations in Rats. Livers 2024, 4, 521-533. https://doi.org/10.3390/livers4040037

AMA Style

Savsani K, Alfonso A, Jo E, Park A, Lee SD. A Novel Bile Duct-Saving Portal Ligation Technique for Subtotal Hepatectomy Survival Operations in Rats. Livers. 2024; 4(4):521-533. https://doi.org/10.3390/livers4040037

Chicago/Turabian Style

Savsani, Kush, Anjelica Alfonso, Ester Jo, Andrew Park, and Seung Duk Lee. 2024. "A Novel Bile Duct-Saving Portal Ligation Technique for Subtotal Hepatectomy Survival Operations in Rats" Livers 4, no. 4: 521-533. https://doi.org/10.3390/livers4040037

APA Style

Savsani, K., Alfonso, A., Jo, E., Park, A., & Lee, S. D. (2024). A Novel Bile Duct-Saving Portal Ligation Technique for Subtotal Hepatectomy Survival Operations in Rats. Livers, 4(4), 521-533. https://doi.org/10.3390/livers4040037

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop