Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Latinx Fathers’ Behaviors, Cognitions, and Family Congruence on Youth Energy Balance-Related Health Outcomes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Associations Between the Maternal Blood Microbiome During Pregnancy and Early Childhood Growth Trajectories: A Pilot Study

1
Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA
2
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA
3
Medicinal Chemistry Core, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA
4
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA
5
Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Obesities 2026, 6(4), 49; https://doi.org/10.3390/obesities6040049
Submission received: 7 May 2026 / Revised: 29 June 2026 / Accepted: 1 July 2026 / Published: 8 July 2026

Abstract

Objective: Maternal blood microbiome signatures during pregnancy have been linked to adverse birth outcomes. We conducted a pilot study to examine whether they are also associated with early childhood growth in offspring and to explore maternal metabolites as potential mediators of these relationships. Methods: This study included 50 mother-child dyads from a prospective pregnancy cohort. Children were selected based on distinct body mass index (BMI) growth trajectories from birth to 4 years, including 25 children in a rising-high-BMI trajectory and 25 in a low-BMI trajectory. Maternal plasma collected during the second trimester underwent 16S rRNA gene sequencing for microbial profiling and an untargeted metabolomics analysis. Microbial diversity indices were compared between groups. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed associations between microbial taxa and BMI trajectories with adjustment for covariates. Mediation analyses evaluated whether maternal metabolites mediated observed associations. Results: Higher maternal blood microbial α-diversity was observed among mothers of children in the rising-high-BMI trajectory. Greater abundance of Gammaproteobacteria/Proteobacteria (class/phylum) was associated with lower odds of membership in the rising-high-BMI trajectory, whereas Bacteroidia/Bacteroidota and Actinobacteria/Actinobacteriota were associated with a greater risk. Mediation analyses identified several maternal metabolites that potentially linked prenatal microbial taxa to child growth outcomes. Key mediators included metabolites involved in benzoate metabolism (e.g., 4-vinylphenol sulfate for taxa Gammaproteobacteria/Proteobacteria), lipid metabolism (e.g., 1-linoleoyl-GPG (18:2) for Bacteroidia/Bacteroidota), glutathione metabolism (cysteinylglycine disulfide for Bacteroidia/Bacteroidota), branched-chain amino acid metabolism (3-hydroxy-2-ethylpropionate for Bacteroidia/Bacteroidota), histidine metabolism (imidazole propionate for Actinobacteria/Actinobacteriota), and TCA cycle (glutaconate for Actinobacteria/Actinobacteriota). These pathways are implicated in oxidative stress, adipocyte differentiation, insulin signaling, and energy metabolism, processes that are highly relevant to obesity development. Conclusion: Findings suggest that prenatal blood microbial signatures may influence early childhood growth through metabolic pathways related to obesity. These pilot study findings support further investigation into the role of prenatal blood microbial signatures in child development and health outcome prediction in larger studies.

1. Introduction

The prevalence of childhood obesity continues to rise in the United States, nearly doubling over the past three decades, with no indication that this trend is slowing. According to the most recent data from the CDC, the prevalence of obesity among U.S. children and adolescents is 19.7%, affecting approximately 14.7 million youths aged 2–19 years [1]. In line with the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) framework, a growing body of evidence suggests that maternal conditions during pregnancy, which can translate into fetal intrauterine exposures, are associated with obesity risk in offspring [2,3,4]. However, scientific understanding of the prenatal programming of offspring obesity is quite limited. There is an urgent need to identify etiologic processes and predictors in order to develop effective strategies to reduce the risk of developing childhood obesity.
Recent studies support the important role of the microbiota at various body sites in pregnancy complications and adverse fetal outcomes, such as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) [5,6], preeclampsia [7,8,9], fetal growth restriction [10,11,12], and preterm birth [13,14,15]. For example, changes in the gut microbiota during pregnancy have been reported to predict the onset of GDM, even weeks before its typical clinical diagnosis [16]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis also found significantly lower gut microbiota α-diversity, measured by the Shannon index, in pregnant women with preeclampsia compared with healthy controls [8]. Although the gut microbiota during pregnancy has been studied most extensively, alterations in maternal microbiota at other body sites, including the placenta and vagina, have also been associated with fetal growth restriction and preterm birth [10,11,12,13,14,15]. These pregnancy and fetal health conditions reflect an adverse intrauterine environment that can significantly influence child health outcomes after birth, including growth trajectories and obesity risk [4,17,18,19,20,21].
The blood microbiome has recently emerged as a novel area of research for understanding disease pathogenesis and improving risk prediction. Once thought to be sterile, human blood is now known, through advances in next-generation sequencing, to contain microbial genetic material even in healthy individuals. Although debate remains about whether these signals represent viable microbes or microbial cell-free DNA (cfDNA), evidence suggests they may originate from multiple body sites, including the gut, skin, and oral cavity [22]. Increasing evidence has linked blood microbial signatures to a range of diseases, including cardiometabolic and inflammatory disorders [23]. However, the role of the prenatal blood microbiome in shaping fetal and child health remains largely unexplored. A few studies have detected complex microbial cfDNA profiles in the blood of healthy pregnant women and suggested potential links to pregnancy outcomes such as preterm birth and stillbirth, though these studies were limited by small sample sizes [24,25]. Significant knowledge gaps remain regarding the dynamics of the maternal blood microbiome during pregnancy and their potential influence on birth outcomes and postnatal growth. Understanding these relationships may reveal novel mechanisms underlying the early-life programming of health and disease.
One potential mechanism linking the maternal microbiome and fetal development is the production of bioactive metabolites by microbiota. These metabolites can enter the maternal circulation and may be actively or passively transferred across the placenta [26]. In animal models, trimethylamine N-oxide, a metabolite regulated by maternal gut microbes, has been shown to promote thalamic axon outgrowth in offspring [27]. In addition, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), another major class of microbiota-derived metabolites, are transported from the maternal gut to the fetus via the placenta. Maternal conditions such as GDM and obesity can alter SCFA production, potentially impairing fetal cardiovascular, neural, and immune development and predisposing offspring to adverse health outcomes later in life [28]. However, no studies to date have systematically identified metabolites that mediate the effects of the circulating microbiome on fetal development and childhood health outcomes.
Therefore, we conducted this pilot study to examine the relationship between prenatal blood microbiome and early childhood body mass index (BMI) growth trajectories using data from the Conditions Affecting Neurocognitive Development and Learning in Early Childhood (CANDLE) cohort, which demonstrates a broad range of obesity risk, ideal for testing these models. BMI trajectories leveraged repeated anthropometric measurements and may offer improved prediction of later-life obesity risk compared to a single growth measurement [29]. In addition, we explored the metabolites that might mediate the relationship between prenatal blood microbiome and child growth outcomes using untargeted metabolomics data collected from CANDLE mothers during pregnancy.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Participants

All the study participants were from the CANDLE study, a prospective pregnancy cohort of mother-child dyads in Shelby County, Tennessee (Memphis and surrounding areas). Accrued between 2006 and 2011, a total of 1503 participants aged 16–40 years during their second trimester of pregnancy with 1455 live births were enrolled in the CANDLE study [30,31]. The inclusion and exclusion of CANDLE participants have been reported previously [31]. In general, the CANDLE sample demographically represents Shelby County, and nearly two-thirds of the participants are Black (N = 953; 65.5%). In a previous study, we observed three BMI trajectory groups among the CANDLE children, the rising-high- (12.2%), moderate- (66.5%), and low-BMI (21.3%) trajectories [4]. The children in the rising-high-BMI trajectory were characterized as having an average birthweight followed by a rapid weight gain during the first year and staying at a stable high BMI level until 4 years old. The low-BMI trajectory had a relatively lower birthweight and rapid growth during the first year but still stayed at a relatively lower BMI. The moderate-BMI trajectory group was in the middle of the rising-high- and the low-BMI trajectory groups, representing the majority of the children. For the present study, to minimize confounding, we restricted our focus to Black families (the predominant self-identified group in the cohort) and we randomly selected 25 children from the rising-high-BMI trajectory group and 25 from the low-BMI trajectory group as cases and controls, respectively, to compare their mothers’ blood microbiome during the second trimester of pregnancy.

2.2. Maternal Data Collection

The mother’s sociodemographic information (age, race, education, insurance type, and marital status), health behaviors (cigarette smoking and alcohol use during pregnancy), parity, and medical history were collected by self-administered questionnaires at enrollment during the second trimester. Self-reported height and weight before pregnancy were collected at enrollment and used to calculate pre-pregnancy BMI as weight (in kilograms) divided by the square of height (in meters). Pregnancy complications and medical updates were obtained since the third trimester visit through an interview of the mother by the study staff and confirmed by medical chart abstraction [32].

2.3. Child Measures

Birth weight and length of the children were extracted from medical charts by research assistants. Body weight and length/height were also measured at each annual visit until 4 years of age using the methods guided by the NHANES protocol [33]. The sex- and age-specific BMI-z-scores for each child were calculated based on the World Health Organization growth standards (<2 years) and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) growth charts (≥2 years) following CDC recommendations [34]. The BMI-z-scores were used to analyze the growth trajectories among the CANDLE children using the latent class growth modeling approach [4].

2.4. Prenatal Blood Microbiome Analysis

The prenatal blood microbiome profiling was conducted by the Center for Metagenomics and Microbiome Research at Baylor College of Medicine (CMMR). Briefly, DNA was extracted from 200 μL plasma samples collected during the second trimester from the mothers using the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (QIAGEN Inc., Germantown, MD, USA). The 16Sv4 rDNA region was amplified by PCR using the universal primers 515F and 806R and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) using the 2 × 250 bp paired-end protocol. A stringent contamination control protocol was implemented. To isolate potential contamination at specific workflow steps, multiple controls are included during DNA extraction and library preparation, including extraction blanks, PCR blanks, and commercial mock communities.
Raw data files in binary base call format were converted into FASTQs and demultiplexed based on the single-index barcodes using the Illumina ‘bcl2fastq’ software. Demultiplexed read pairs underwent initial quality filtering using bbduk.sh (BBMap version 38.82,5), removing Illumina adapters, PhiX reads and reads with a Phred quality score below 15 and length below 100 bp after trimming. Quality-controlled reads were then merged using bbmerge.sh (BBMap version 38.82,5), with merge parameters optimized for the 16SV4 amplicon type (maxstrict = t, qtrim = t, trimq = 15). Merged reads were then further filtered using VSEARCH, allowing for a maximum expected error of 0.05, a maximum length of 254 bp and a minimum length of 252 bp [35]. All the reads were combined into a single FASTA file for further processing.
Resulting reads were clustered into OTUs at a similarity cutoff of 97% via the UPARSE algorithm [36] using an in-house iterative stepwise approach that includes chimera filtering [37]. Briefly, reads were first dereplicated using the VSEARCH “derep_fulllength” option and recording the size to identify singletons. The dereplicated non-singleton reads were clustered through an iterative stepwise manner in increments of 0.4% using usearch70 “cluster_otus” function. Singletons were mapped back to the dereplicated reads using usearch70 “-usearch_global” at a 99% identity, and mapped reads were added to the output. The final output was run through usearch70 ‘uchime_ref’ program against the GOLD database [38], using only the plus strand and allowing for no chimeras, in order to create a clustered OTU file with no chimeras. The data were then rarefied for analyses. The OTU centroids file was mapped against an optimized version of the latest current SILVA Database [39] containing only sequences from the v4 region of the 16S rRNA gene to determine taxonomies using the usearch70 “usearch_global” function [40], specifying the identity threshold to 97%. The V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene might provide good resolution at the genus level [41]. The detected genera were further filtered against the list of potential contaminating genera for quality control [42].

2.5. Prenatal Metabolomics Analysis

Maternal plasma samples collected in the second trimester were used to conduct prenatal metabolomic profiling. An untargeted metabolomics analysis was performed using the Metabolon Discovery HD4TM Platform (Metabolon Inc., Morrisville, NC, USA), which includes four ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry methods. More details of the metabolomics analysis have been previously reported [43]. A total of 949 metabolites with known structural identity (named biochemicals) were identified in the study samples. After excluding 69 metabolites with missing/below-the-detection-limit > 80% of the samples, 880 metabolites were included in the present study.

2.6. Data Analysis

Clinical characteristics of the rising-high-BMI and low-BMI trajectory groups were compared using t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Fisher’s exact tests were used instead of chi-square tests when cell counts were small, including for education (>high school), cigarette smoking and alcohol use during pregnancy. Microbial α-diversity indices, including Observed OTUs, Shannon, Chao1, Simpson, and InvSimpson, were calculated and compared between the two BMI trajectory groups using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. β-diversity was assessed using Bray–Curtis, Jaccard, and robust Aitchison dissimilarities. Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) implemented in the R package vegan was used to visualize group differences, and the permutational multivariate analysis of variance method (PERMANOVA) was used to test differences across groups for each distance metric. To identify and prioritize microbiota associated with the outcome, we examined the associations between the rarefied abundance of each bacterial taxon and the risk of membership into the rising-high-BMI trajectory group using multivariable logistic regression models. The models were adjusted for potential confounders, including maternal age at pregnancy, prepregnancy BMI, socioeconomic status (education and insurance type), lifestyle factors (smoking and alcohol consumption), parity, and antibiotic use.
To explore whether the associations between prenatal blood microbiota and BMI growth trajectories in offspring were mediated by prenatal metabolite outcomes, we first identified the metabolites that were associated with the identified outcome-associated microbiota (exposure variables) and also associated with BMI trajectories (outcome variables) at a significance level of p value < 0.10. We then evaluated whether these metabolites mediated the associations between prenatal microbiota and study outcomes using the R package mediation [44]. The same set of covariates as used in the logistic regression analysis was included in the mediation models.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of the Study Subjects

The characteristics of the study mothers and children in the rising-high-BMI and low-BMI trajectory groups are shown in Table 1. The average age (SD) of the mothers at pregnancy, education levels, health insurance, smoking and alcohol drinking status, and parity did not differ significantly between the trajectory groups (all p > 0.05). However, mothers of children in the rising-high-BMI group had a higher prepregnancy BMI level than those whose children were in the low-BMI group (p = 0.03). The gestational age at birth did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.09). Children in the rising-high-BMI group had higher birthweight and BMI-z-scores at ages 1, 2, 3, and 4 years (all p < 0.05).

3.2. Diversity Analyses

Almost all α-diversity indices we examined were significantly higher in mothers of children in the rising-high-BMI trajectory group compared with those in the low-BMI group (p < 0.05), except for the Chao1 index (p = 0.07) (Figure 1). Differences in β-diversity between the two trajectory groups were visualized using PCoA plots (Figure 2). Although none of the three β-diversity metrics reached statistical significance, a trend toward separation between the two growth trajectory groups was observed in the PCoA plots based on the Jaccard and Bray–Curtis dissimilarity indices (p = 0.102 and 0.104, respectively).

3.3. Taxonomic Composition of Prenatal Blood Microbiota

Taxonomic profiling of the prenatal blood microbiota identified a total of 48 genera, 35 families, 27 orders, 12 classes, and 7 phyla. Figure 3 shows the top 10 genera based on relative abundance.

3.4. Associations Between Prenatal Blood Microbiota and Child Growth Trajectories

After adjusting for potential confounders, several bacterial taxa were associated with BMI trajectories at a significance level of p < 0.10 (most of p values < 0.05) (Table 2). Higher abundance of class Gammaproteobacteria and its parent phylum Proteobacteria was associated with a lower risk of membership in the rising high-BMI trajectory group (both p < 0.05). In contrast, class Bacteroidia and its phylum Bacteroidota were associated with an increased risk of membership in the rising high-BMI trajectory group (both p < 0.05). Class Actinobacteria and its phylum Actinobacteriota showed suggestive positive associations with the risk of membership in the rising high-BMI trajectory group (p = 0.050 and 0.093, respectively).

3.5. Metabolite Mediators Linking Prenatal Blood Microbiota and Child Growth Outcomes

Mediation analyses identified several maternal metabolites that potentially linked prenatal blood microbial taxa to childhood growth trajectories with p values of mediation effects < 0.10 (Table 3). At both class and phylum levels, associations for Gammaproteobacteria/Proteobacteria were mediated by benzoate-related metabolites (e.g., 4-vinylphenol sulfate and 4-hydroxyhippurate), phytanate, and lysophospholipids, with mediation proportions ranging from approximately 20% to 38%. For Bacteroidia/Bacteroidota, glutathione-related (cysteinylglycine disulfide), benzoate-related, and lysophospholipid metabolites showed positive mediation effects (22%–41%), whereas 3-hydroxy-2-ethylpropionate demonstrated inverse mediation (~−22%). Actinobacteria/Actinobacteriota exhibited the strongest signals, particularly through glutaconate (TCA cycle; ~42%), along with 3-hydroxypyridine sulfate and imidazole propionate.

4. Discussion

In this pilot study, we detected and characterized maternal prenatal blood microbiome signatures that were associated with early childhood growth trajectories. We also identified potential prenatal metabolite mediators linking the prenatal blood microbiome signatures with the child growth outcome. These findings support further investigations of prenatal blood microbiome for predicting and understanding the early origins of child health outcomes.
We observed that higher prenatal maternal blood microbiome α-diversity was associated with offspring who had normal birth weight but exhibited rapid postnatal weight gain (rising-high-BMI trajectory), compared to those with relatively lower birth weight and slower subsequent growth (low-BMI trajectory). Greater microbial α-diversity within a low-biomass compartment such as maternal blood should not be interpreted as inherently beneficial. In contrast to the gut, where higher diversity often reflects ecological stability, greater diversity detected in circulation may signal enhanced microbial translocation, barrier perturbation, or low-grade systemic inflammation rather than a structured resident community [45]. Notably, greater blood microbial diversity has been observed in pregnant women who delivered preterm compared with those who delivered at full term [25]. Circulating bacterial DNA fragments and pathogen-associated molecular patterns can arise from increased intestinal permeability and have been implicated in metabolic endotoxemia, inflammatory activation, and obesity development [46,47,48]. During pregnancy, even subtle elevations in systemic inflammatory level may influence placental signaling, nutrient transport, and fetal tissue differentiation [49]. Experimental and epidemiologic evidence suggests that maternal immune and metabolic status shapes fetal adipogenesis, insulin sensitivity, and hypothalamic appetite regulation, thereby programming postnatal growth trajectories [50]. In this context, higher circulating microbial diversity may reflect heterogenous microbial exposure that amplifies inflammatory or metabolic signaling during gestation, priming offspring for enhanced energy storage efficiency and accelerated postnatal weight gain despite normal birth weight. Conversely, lower diversity in maternal blood may indicate reduced microbial translocation or systemic inflammatory levels, potentially corresponding to relatively normal in utero growth.
In this study, several prenatal blood microbial taxa were associated with BMI growth trajectories in early childhood. At the phylum level, taxa Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, and Actinobacteriota have been reported as dominant groups within the human circulating microbiome [25]. Higher abundances of Gammaproteobacteria and its parent phylum Proteobacteria in maternal blood during pregnancy were associated with lower odds of children being classified into the rising high-BMI trajectory group. In contrast, enrichment of Bacteroidia (phylum Bacteroidota) and Actinobacteria (phylum Actinobacteriota) were positively associated with increased risk of membership in the rising high-BMI trajectory group. Alterations in the abundance of Bacteroidota and Actinobacteriota have previously been linked to obesity and metabolic dysfunction, although findings are heterogeneous [51,52,53,54]. Members of Bacteroidia in gut are major producers of immunologically active lipopolysaccharides that can influence host inflammatory tone and insulin signaling, pathways central to adiposity development [55]. Increased exposure to such microbial components during pregnancy, potentially via translocation into maternal circulation, may alter placental immune signaling and nutrient transport, thereby influencing fetal adipocyte differentiation and energy homeostasis. Actinobacteria have been associated with obesity in children and with type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome in adults [53,56].
Conversely, the inverse association observed for Proteobacteria is noteworthy given that expansion of Proteobacteria in the gut is often considered a marker of dysbiosis and inflammation [57]. However, associations between Proteobacteria and obesity are inconsistent in previous studies, and shifts in relative abundance may reflect broader microbial community changes rather than direct causal effects [58]. In the context of maternal blood, a low-biomass environment, these taxa likely represent differential microbial translocation rather than a stable circulating microbial community. One possible interpretation is that relative enrichment of Bacteroidota and Actinobacteriota, together with lower levels of Proteobacteria, may indicate a maternal immune-metabolic environment that favors obesogenic fetal programming. Future studies with species-level resolution, functional microbial profiling, and detailed maternal inflammatory and metabolic markers will be important to determine whether these taxa contribute mechanistically to offspring adiposity or simply act as biomarkers of maternal physiological states during pregnancy.
Mediation analyses identified maternal metabolites that potentially mediate the associations between prenatal blood microbial taxa and childhood growth trajectories in offspring. Three phyla, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, and Actinobacteriota, may influence childhood obesity risk through distinct yet converging metabolic pathways rooted in microbial-host co-metabolism. For Proteobacteria, metabolites such as phytanate and aromatic sulfated compounds including 4-hydroxyhippurate may affect fetal adiposity development by modulating peroxisomal β-oxidation, PPAR signaling, and inflammatory tone in utero, processes that can program lipid storage and energy balance in the offspring [59,60]. In Bacteroidota, mediators such as cysteinylglycine disulfide (reflecting glutathione turnover and oxidative stress), 1-linoleoyl-GPG (18:2) (a lysophospholipid indicating membrane lipid remodeling), and 3-hydroxy-2-ethylpropionate (linked to branched-chain amino acid and intermediary carbon metabolism) could influence fetal growth and adipocyte differentiation by shaping oxidative stress status, membrane composition, and nutrient sensing, which may alter metabolic set points in early life [61]. Actinobacteriota-associated metabolites, including glutaconate (intermediary carbon metabolism) and imidazole propionate (histidine-derived microbial metabolite), may program insulin signaling and mitochondrial energy utilization in the developing fetus. Specifically, imidazole propionate, a microbial-derived metabolite, can impair insulin receptor signaling via the p38γ/p62/mTORC1 pathway, potentially promoting early insulin resistance and predisposing the child to postnatal obesity [62].
The primary limitations of this study include the modest sample size and the use of a less stringent significance threshold without adjustment for multiple testing. Therefore, the results should be interpreted with appropriate caution. Nevertheless, as a pilot investigation, this study provides important preliminary evidence suggesting a potential role of the prenatal blood microbiome in shaping child development. By integrating prenatal metabolomic biomarkers, we identified microbially derived metabolites as potential mediators, further supporting a mechanistic link between the prenatal blood microbiome and child developmental outcomes. Future studies are still needed to examine the causal relationship between the outcome-related prenatal blood microbiota and metabolite mediators. Another limitation is that the RNA-sequencing approach could not distinguish the origin of the detected microbial signatures, whether from viable microbiota or from bacterial genetic material translocated into the circulation from other body niches. However, many of the major microbial members identified in this study have been reported in previous blood microbiome studies, supporting the biological plausibility of our findings [22,63].
In conclusion, our findings provide novel preliminary evidence supporting a potential role of the prenatal blood microbiome in early childhood growth. Maternal metabolites may act as mechanistic mediators linking the prenatal blood microbiome to intrauterine adiposity programming, thereby influencing postnatal growth trajectories. Larger, well-powered studies with more comprehensive profiling of blood microbial communities, including species- and strain-level resolution, are needed to further elucidate these associations and confirm their relevance for obesity etiology and prevention.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.Z.; Methodology, Q.Z.; Formal analysis, Q.Z., C.-Y.C. and L.H.; Resources, Q.Z., J.L., N.R.B. and K.Z.L.; Writing—original draft, Q.Z., C.-Y.C., L.H., A.J.G.R. and J.L.; Writing—review & editing, Q.Z., C.-Y.C., L.H., A.J.G.R., J.L., K.Z.L. and N.R.B.; Supervision, Q.Z.; Funding acquisition, Q.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The CANDLE study was supported by the Urban Child Institute, the University of Tennessee Health Science Center, and the National Institutes of Health grants (R01HL109977). Qi Zhao was also supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01AG061917, R01AG068232, R01DK134937, U19AG055373, UG3OD035519, and UH3OD035519).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The CANDLE study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Tennessee Health Science Center (Study ID: 06-08495-FB).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was given by participants 18 years or older, while assent was given by those less than 18 years and consent was provided by their legally authorized representative prior to enrollment.

Data Availability Statement

The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions. However, the data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the participants of the CANDLE study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Fryar, C.D.; Carroll, M.D.; Ogden, C.L. Prevalence of Overweight, Obesity, and Severe Obesity Among Children and Adolescents Aged 2–19 Years: United States, 1963–1965 Through 2015–2016; NCHS Health E-Stats; National Center for Health Statistics: Hyattsville, MD, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  2. Nicholas, L.M.; Morrison, J.L.; Rattanatray, L.; Zhang, S.; Ozanne, S.E.; McMillen, I.C. The early origins of obesity and insulin resistance: Timing, programming and mechanisms. Int. J. Obes. 2016, 40, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rudd, K.L.; Zhao, Q.; Lisha, N.E.; Graff, J.C.; Norona-Zhou, A.; Roubinov, D.S.; Barrett, E.S.; Juarez, P.; Carroll, K.N.; Karr, C.J.; et al. The role of prenatal violence exposure in the development of disparities in children’s adiposity from birth to middle childhood. Obesity 2023, 31, 2119–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hu, Z.; Tylavsky, F.A.; Han, J.C.; Kocak, M.; Fowke, J.H.; Davis, R.L.; Lewinn, K.; Bush, N.R.; Zhao, Q. Maternal Metabolic Factors during Pregnancy Predict Early Childhood Growth Trajectories and Obesity Risk: The CANDLE Study. Int. J. Obes. 2019, 43, 1914–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Medici Dualib, P.; Ogassavara, J.; Mattar, R.; Mariko Koga da Silva, E.; Atala Dib, S.; de Almeida Pititto, B. Gut microbiota and gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A systematic review. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2021, 180, 109078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ma, S.; Wang, Y.; Ji, X.; Dong, S.; Wang, S.; Zhang, S.; Deng, F.; Chen, J.; Lin, B.; Khan, B.A.; et al. Relationship between gut microbiota and the pathogenesis of gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. Front Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1364545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zong, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, J. Research progress on the correlation between gut microbiota and preeclampsia: Microbiome changes, mechanisms and treatments. Front Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1256940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Colonetti, T.; Limas Carmo Teixeira, D.; Grande, A.J.; Rodrigues Uggioni, M.L.; Generoso, J.; Harding, S.; Rodriguez-Mateos, A.; Rech, P.; Rosa Silva, F.; Toreti, I.; et al. The role of intestinal microbiota on pre-eclampsia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2023, 291, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jordan, M.M.; Amabebe, E.; Khanipov, K.; Taylor, B.D. Scoping Review of Microbiota Dysbiosis and Risk of Preeclampsia. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2024, 92, e70003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Tao, Z.; Chen, Y.; He, F.; Tang, J.; Zhan, L.; Hu, H.; Ding, Z.; Ruan, S.; Chen, Y.; Chen, B.; et al. Alterations in the Gut Microbiome and Metabolisms in Pregnancies with Fetal Growth Restriction. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e0007623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Hu, J.; Benny, P.; Wang, M.; Ma, Y.; Lambertini, L.; Peter, I.; Xu, Y.; Lee, M.J. Intrauterine Growth Restriction Is Associated with Unique Features of the Reproductive Microbiome. Reprod. Sci. 2021, 28, 828–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Juliana, N.C.A.; Suiters, M.J.M.; Al-Nasiry, S.; Morre, S.A.; Peters, R.P.H.; Ambrosino, E. The Association Between Vaginal Microbiota Dysbiosis, Bacterial Vaginosis, and Aerobic Vaginitis, and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes of Women Living in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review. Front Public Health 2020, 8, 567885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Parnell, L.A.; Briggs, C.M.; Mysorekar, I.U. Maternal microbiomes in preterm birth: Recent progress and analytical pipelines. Semin Perinatol. 2017, 41, 392–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dahl, C.; Stanislawski, M.; Iszatt, N.; Mandal, S.; Lozupone, C.; Clemente, J.C.; Knight, R.; Stigum, H.; Eggesbo, M. Gut microbiome of mothers delivering prematurely shows reduced diversity and lower relative abundance of Bifidobacterium and Streptococcus. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0184336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Saadaoui, M.; Djekidel, M.N.; Murugesan, S.; Kumar, M.; Elhag, D.; Singh, P.; Kabeer, B.S.A.; Marr, A.K.; Kino, T.; Brummaier, T.; et al. Exploring the composition of placental microbiome and its potential origin in preterm birth. Front Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1486409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pinto, Y.; Frishman, S.; Turjeman, S.; Eshel, A.; Nuriel-Ohayon, M.; Shrossel, O.; Ziv, O.; Walters, W.; Parsonnet, J.; Ley, C.; et al. Gestational diabetes is driven by microbiota-induced inflammation months before diagnosis. Gut 2023, 72, 918–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kim, S.Y.; Sharma, A.J.; Callaghan, W.M. Gestational diabetes and childhood obesity: What is the link? Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012, 24, 376–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wang, J.; Wang, L.; Liu, H.; Zhang, S.; Leng, J.; Li, W.; Zhang, T.; Li, N.; Li, W.; Baccarelli, A.A.; et al. Maternal gestational diabetes and different indicators of childhood obesity: A large study. Endocr. Connect. 2018, 7, 1464–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Yan, S.; Lyu, J.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, S.; Ji, Y.; Wang, H. Association of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia with offspring adiposity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 906781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Gantenbein, K.V.; Kanaka-Gantenbein, C. Highlighting the trajectory from intrauterine growth restriction to future obesity. Front Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 1041718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Gnawali, A. Prematurity and the Risk of Development of Childhood Obesity: Piecing Together the Pathophysiological Puzzle. A Literature Review. Cureus 2021, 13, e20518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Whittle, E.; Leonard, M.O.; Harrison, R.; Gant, T.W.; Tonge, D.P. Multi-Method Characterization of the Human Circulating Microbiome. Front Microbiol. 2018, 9, 3266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Amar, J.; Lange, C.; Payros, G.; Garret, C.; Chabo, C.; Lantieri, O.; Courtney, M.; Marre, M.; Charles, M.A.; Balkau, B.; et al. Blood microbiota dysbiosis is associated with the onset of cardiovascular events in a large general population: The D.E.S.I.R. study. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e54461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Vander Haar, E.L.; Wu, G.; Gyamfi-Bannerman, C.; Thomas, C.; Wapner, R.J.; Reddy, U.M.; Zhao, L.; Silver, R.M.; Goldenberg, R.L.; Han, Y.W. Microbial Analysis of Umbilical Cord Blood Reveals Novel Pathogens Associated with Stillbirth and Early Preterm Birth. mBio 2022, 13, e0203622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. You, Y.-A.; Yoo, J.Y.; Kwon, E.J.; Kim, Y.J. Blood Microbial Communities During Pregnancy Are Associated with Preterm Birth. Original Research. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ruiz-Trivino, J.; Alvarez, D.; Cadavid, J.A.; Alvarez, A.M. From gut to placenta: Understanding how the maternal microbiome models life-long conditions. Front Endocrinol. 2023, 14, 1304727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Vuong, H.E.; Pronovost, G.N.; Williams, D.W.; Coley, E.J.L.; Siegler, E.L.; Qiu, A.; Kazantsev, M.; Wilson, C.J.; Rendon, T.; Hsiao, E.Y. The maternal microbiome modulates fetal neurodevelopment in mice. Nature 2020, 586, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Qin, X.; Zhang, M.; Chen, S.; Tang, Y.; Cui, J.; Ding, G. Short-chain fatty acids in fetal development and metabolism. Trends Mol. Med. 2024, 31, 625–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Aris, I.M.; Chen, L.W.; Tint, M.T.; Pang, W.W.; Soh, S.E.; Saw, S.M.; Shek, L.P.; Tan, K.H.; Gluckman, P.D.; Chong, Y.S.; et al. Body mass index trajectories in the first two years and subsequent childhood cardio-metabolic outcomes: A prospective multi-ethnic Asian cohort study. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Hu, Z.; Han, L.; Liu, J.; Fowke, J.H.; Han, J.C.; Kakhniashvili, D.; LeWinn, K.Z.; Bush, N.R.; Mason, W.A.; Zhao, Q. Prenatal Metabolomic Profiles Mediate the Effect of Maternal Obesity on Early Childhood Growth Trajectories and Obesity Risk: The CANDLE Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2022, 116, 1343–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Tylavsky, F.A.; Kocak, M.; Murphy, L.E.; Graff, J.C.; Palmer, F.B.; Volgyi, E.; Diaz-Thomas, A.M.; Ferry, R.J., Jr. Gestational Vitamin 25(OH)D Status as a Risk Factor for Receptive Language Development: A 24-Month, Longitudinal, Observational Study. Nutrients 2015, 7, 9918–9930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sontag-Padilla, L.; Burns, R.M.; Shih, R.A.; Griffin, B.A.; Martin, L.T.; Chandra, A.; Tylavsky, F. The Urban Child Institute CANDLE Study: Methodological Overview and Baseline Sample Description; RR-1336-TUCI; RAND Corporation: Santa Monica, CA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  33. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. 1999–2016 Survey Content Brochure; National Center for Health Statistics: Hyattsville, MD, USA, 2015. Available online: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/83705 (accessed on 7 February 2026).
  34. Grummer-Strawn, L.M.; Reinold, C.; Krebs, N.F. Use of World Health Organization and CDC growth charts for children aged 0–59 months in the United States. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 2010, 59, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Rognes, T.; Flouri, T.; Nichols, B.; Quince, C.; Mahe, F. VSEARCH: A versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 2016, 4, e2584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Edgar, R.C. UPARSE: Highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 996–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Edgar, R.C.; Haas, B.J.; Clemente, J.C.; Quince, C.; Knight, R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 2194–2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kyrpides, N.C. Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD 1.0): A monitor of complete and ongoing genome projects world-wide. Bioinformatics 1999, 15, 773–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Quast, C.; Pruesse, E.; Yilmaz, P.; Gerken, J.; Schweer, T.; Yarza, P.; Peplies, J.; Glockner, F.O. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, D590–D596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Edgar, R.C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 2460–2461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Johnson, J.S.; Spakowicz, D.J.; Hong, B.Y.; Petersen, L.M.; Demkowicz, P.; Chen, L.; Leopold, S.R.; Hanson, B.M.; Agresta, H.O.; Gerstein, M.; et al. Evaluation of 16S rRNA gene sequencing for species and strain-level microbiome analysis. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Salter, S.J.; Cox, M.J.; Turek, E.M.; Calus, S.T.; Cookson, W.O.; Moffatt, M.F.; Turner, P.; Parkhill, J.; Loman, N.J.; Walker, A.W. Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses. BMC Biol. 2014, 12, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhao, Q.; Hu, Z.; Kocak, M.; Liu, J.; Fowke, J.H.; Han, J.C.; Kakhniashvili, D.; Lewinn, K.Z.; Bush, N.R.; Mason, W.A.; et al. Associations of prenatal metabolomics profiles with early childhood growth trajectories and obesity risk in African Americans: The CANDLE study. Int. J. Obes. 2021, 45, 1439–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tingley, D.; Yamamoto, T.; Hirose, K.; Keele, L.; Imai, K. Mediation: R Package for Causal Mediation Analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 2014, 59, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tan, C.C.S.; Ko, K.K.K.; Chen, H.; Liu, J.; Loh, M.; Consortium, S.G.K.H.; Chia, M.; Nagarajan, N. No evidence for a common blood microbiome based on a population study of 9,770 healthy humans. Nat. Microbiol. 2023, 8, 973–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Cani, P.D.; Amar, J.; Iglesias, M.A.; Poggi, M.; Knauf, C.; Bastelica, D.; Neyrinck, A.M.; Fava, F.; Tuohy, K.M.; Chabo, C.; et al. Metabolic endotoxemia initiates obesity and insulin resistance. Diabetes 2007, 56, 1761–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Proctor, C.; Thiennimitr, P.; Chattipakorn, N.; Chattipakorn, S.C. Diet, gut microbiota and cognition. Metab. Brain Dis. 2017, 32, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Rosendo-Silva, D.; Viana, S.; Carvalho, E.; Reis, F.; Matafome, P. Are gut dysbiosis, barrier disruption, and endotoxemia related to adipose tissue dysfunction in metabolic disorders? Overview of the mechanisms involved. Intern Emerg. Med. 2023, 18, 1287–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Parisi, F.; Milazzo, R.; Savasi, V.M.; Cetin, I. Maternal Low-Grade Chronic Inflammation and Intrauterine Programming of Health and Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Godfrey, K.M.; Reynolds, R.M.; Prescott, S.L.; Nyirenda, M.; Jaddoe, V.W.; Eriksson, J.G.; Broekman, B.F. Influence of maternal obesity on the long-term health of offspring. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017, 5, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Sze, M.A.; Schloss, P.D. Looking for a Signal in the Noise: Revisiting Obesity and the Microbiome. mBio 2016, 7, e01018-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Magne, F.; Gotteland, M.; Gauthier, L.; Zazueta, A.; Pesoa, S.; Navarrete, P.; Balamurugan, R. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes Ratio: A Relevant Marker of Gut Dysbiosis in Obese Patients? Nutrients 2020, 12, 1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ahmed, K.; Choi, H.N.; Cho, S.R.; Yim, J.E. Association of Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes Ratio with Body Mass Index in Korean Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients. Metabolites 2024, 14, 518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bai, J.; Hu, Y.; Bruner, D.W. Composition of gut microbiota and its association with body mass index and lifestyle factors in a cohort of 7-18 years old children from the American Gut Project. Pediatr. Obes. 2019, 14, e12480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Jeong, S. Gut microbiota’s impact on obesity. Clin. Exp. Pediatr. 2023, 66, 294–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wang, J.; Zhuang, P.; Lin, B.; Li, H.; Zheng, J.; Tang, W.; Ye, W.; Chen, X.; Zheng, M. Gut microbiota profiling in obese children from Southeastern China. BMC Pediatr. 2024, 24, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Shin, N.R.; Whon, T.W.; Bae, J.W. Proteobacteria: Microbial signature of dysbiosis in gut microbiota. Trends Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 496–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Xu, Z.; Jiang, W.; Huang, W.; Lin, Y.; Chan, F.K.L.; Ng, S.C. Gut microbiota in patients with obesity and metabolic disorders-A systematic review. Genes Nutr. 2022, 17, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Jiang, Z.; He, L.; Li, D.; Zhuo, L.; Chen, L.; Shi, R.Q.; Luo, J.; Feng, Y.; Liang, Y.; Li, D.; et al. Human gut microbial aromatic amino acid and related metabolites prevent obesity through intestinal immune control. Nat. Metab. 2025, 7, 808–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Wang, P.; Wang, R.; Zhao, W.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, D.; Zhao, S.; Ge, Z.; Ma, Y.; Zhao, X. Gut microbiota-derived 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid from resveratrol supplementation prevents obesity through SIRT1 signaling activation. Gut Microbes 2025, 17, 2446391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ejtahed, H.S.; Angoorani, P.; Soroush, A.R.; Hasani-Ranjbar, S.; Siadat, S.D.; Larijani, B. Gut microbiota-derived metabolites in obesity: A systematic review. Biosci. Microbiota Food Health 2020, 39, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Koh, A.; Molinaro, A.; Stahlman, M.; Khan, M.T.; Schmidt, C.; Manneras-Holm, L.; Wu, H.; Carreras, A.; Jeong, H.; Olofsson, L.E.; et al. Microbially Produced Imidazole Propionate Impairs Insulin Signaling through mTORC1. Cell 2018, 175, 947–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Sciarra, F.; Franceschini, E.; Campolo, F.; Venneri, M.A. The Diagnostic Potential of the Human Blood Microbiome: Are We Dreaming or Awake? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Comparisons of α-diversity indices between the low-BMI and rising-high-BMI trajectory groups.
Figure 1. Comparisons of α-diversity indices between the low-BMI and rising-high-BMI trajectory groups.
Obesities 06 00049 g001
Figure 2. PCoA plots of β-diversity indices.
Figure 2. PCoA plots of β-diversity indices.
Obesities 06 00049 g002
Figure 3. Taxonomic composition bar plot in the different trajectory groups at the genus level.
Figure 3. Taxonomic composition bar plot in the different trajectory groups at the genus level.
Obesities 06 00049 g003
Table 1. Characteristics of study participants.
Table 1. Characteristics of study participants.
VariablesLow-BMI
Trajectory
(N = 25)
Rising-High-BMI Trajectory
(N = 25)
p Value
Maternal
Age, years24.4 (4.7)26.6 (6.7)0.188
More than high school, %20.016.01.000
Medicaid, %80.080.01.000
Smoking, %8.020.00.417
Alcohol drinking, %12.016.01.000
Parity (primiparous), %36.028.00.762
Pre-pregnancy BMI, kg/m226.9 (7.2)32.6 (10.4)0.030
Child
Male, %48.048.01.000
Gestational age at birth, week38.9 (1.0)39.4 (1.1)0.090
Birth weight, kg3.0 (0.3)3.3 (0.5)0.007
Birth length, cm50.4 (2.1)50.0 (2.9)0.650
BMI-z-score at birth−1.39 (0.86)−0.16 (1.10)<0.001
BMI-z-score at age 1−0.20 (1.18)2.83 (1.26)<0.001
BMI-z-score at age 2−1.05 (1.28)2.17 (0.89)<0.001
BMI-z-score at age 3−0.80 (0.73)2.30 (1.05)<0.001
BMI-z-score at age 4−0.72 (0.85)1.99 (0.97)<0.001
BMI, body mass index. Continuous variables are means (standard deviations).
Table 2. Prenatal blood microbiota at different taxonomic levels associated with the rising-high-BMI trajectory group in children at a p value < 0.10.
Table 2. Prenatal blood microbiota at different taxonomic levels associated with the rising-high-BMI trajectory group in children at a p value < 0.10.
TaxaOR (95% CI)p Value
Class
Gammaproteobacteria0.91 (0.84, 0.99)0.030
Bacteroidia1.82 (1.05, 3.15)0.032
Actinobacteria1.32 (1.00, 1.75)0.050
Phylum
Proteobacteria0.90 (0.83, 0.99)0.026
Bacteroidota1.82 (1.05, 3.15)0.032
Actinobacteriota1.24 (0.94, 1.59)0.093
Table 3. Prenatal Metabolites Mediating the Efforts of Prenatal Blood Microbiota on BMI Growth Trajectories in Children.
Table 3. Prenatal Metabolites Mediating the Efforts of Prenatal Blood Microbiota on BMI Growth Trajectories in Children.
TaxaMetabolite MediatorMetabolic Pathwayp Value of Mediation EffectProportion Mediated, %
Class
Gammaproteobacteria4-vinylphenol sulfateBenzoate Metabolism0.05227.3
3beta-hydroxy-5-cholestenoateSterol0.06422.1
phytanateFood Component/Plant0.07026.6
1-linoleoyl-GPG (18:2)Lysophospholipid0.08232.1
Bacteroidiacysteinylglycine disulfideGlutathione Metabolism0.06437.5
3-hydroxy-2-ethylpropionateLeucine, Isoleucine and Valine Metabolism0.084−21.5
4-hydroxyhippurateBenzoate Metabolism0.08439.4
1-linoleoyl-GPG (18:2)Lysophospholipid0.09622.6
ActinobacteriaglutaconateTCA Cycle0.03042.1
3-hydroxypyridine sulfateChemical0.05433.9
imidazole propionateHistidine Metabolism0.09818.5
Phylum
ProteobacteriaphytanateFood Component/Plant0.07427.7
2-piperidinoneFood Component/Plant0.07820.8
4-vinylphenol sulfateBenzoate Metabolism0.08428.2
4-hydroxyhippurateBenzoate Metabolism0.09037.8
Bacteroidotacysteinylglycine disulfideGlutathione Metabolism0.05638.9
4-hydroxyhippurateBenzoate Metabolism0.06640.9
1-linoleoyl-GPG (18:2)Lysophospholipid0.08021.9
3-hydroxy-2-ethylpropionateLeucine, Isoleucine and Valine Metabolism0.086−22.1
ActinobacteriotaglutaconateTCA Cycle0.03241.9
3-hydroxypyridine sulfateChemical0.06631.4
1-linoleoyl-GPG (18:2)Lysophospholipid0.07226.2
imidazole propionateHistidine Metabolism0.09619.5
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, Q.; Chiu, C.-Y.; Han, L.; Rogers, A.J.G.; Liu, J.; LeWinn, K.Z.; Bush, N.R. Associations Between the Maternal Blood Microbiome During Pregnancy and Early Childhood Growth Trajectories: A Pilot Study. Obesities 2026, 6, 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/obesities6040049

AMA Style

Zhao Q, Chiu C-Y, Han L, Rogers AJG, Liu J, LeWinn KZ, Bush NR. Associations Between the Maternal Blood Microbiome During Pregnancy and Early Childhood Growth Trajectories: A Pilot Study. Obesities. 2026; 6(4):49. https://doi.org/10.3390/obesities6040049

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Qi, Chi-Yang Chiu, Luhang Han, Anna Joy G. Rogers, Jiawang Liu, Kaja Z. LeWinn, and Nicole R. Bush. 2026. "Associations Between the Maternal Blood Microbiome During Pregnancy and Early Childhood Growth Trajectories: A Pilot Study" Obesities 6, no. 4: 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/obesities6040049

APA Style

Zhao, Q., Chiu, C.-Y., Han, L., Rogers, A. J. G., Liu, J., LeWinn, K. Z., & Bush, N. R. (2026). Associations Between the Maternal Blood Microbiome During Pregnancy and Early Childhood Growth Trajectories: A Pilot Study. Obesities, 6(4), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/obesities6040049

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop