Torsional Strength of Recycled Coarse Aggregate Reinforced Concrete Beams
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Torsion Database
3. Torsional Strength of RCA Reinforced Concrete Beams
3.1. Normalized Torsional Shear Stress
3.2. Effect of Compressive Strength
3.3. Effect of Reinforcement Ratios in Transverse and Longitudinal Directions
3.4. Comparison with Shear Strength
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- U.S. Department of Transportation. Transportation Applications of Recycled Concrete Aggregate; FHWA State of the Practice National Review; Federal Highway Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2004; pp. 1–47. [Google Scholar]
- Katrina, M.; Kang, T.H.K. Recycled concrete aggregates: A review. Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater. 2013, 7, 61–69. [Google Scholar]
- Pani, L.; Francesconi, L.; Rombi, J.; Mistretta, F.; Sassu, M.; Stochino, F. Effect of parent concrete on the performance of recycled aggregate concrete. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mistri, A.; Bhattacharyya, S.K.; Dhami, N.; Mukherjee, A. A review on different treatment methods for enhancing the properties of recycled aggregates for sustainable construction materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 233, 117894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajdukiewics, A.B.; Kliszczewicz, A.T. Comparative tests of beams and columns made of recycled aggregate concrete and natural aggregate concrete. J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 2007, 5, 259–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Deresa, S.T.; Xu, J.; Demartino, C.; Heo, Y.A.; Li, Z.; Xiao, Y. A review of experimental results on structural performance of reinforced recycled aggregate concrete beams and columns. Adv. Struct. Eng. 2020, 23, 3351–3369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Etxeberria, M.; Mari, A.R.; Va´zquez, E. Recycled aggregate concrete as structural material. Mater. Struct. 2006, 40, 529–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puppio, M.L.; Pellegrino, M.; Giresini, L.; Sassu, M. Effect of material variability and mechanical eccentricity on the seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete buildings. Buildings 2017, 7, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xiao, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, C. Mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete under uniaxial loading. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005, 35, 1187–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, W.C.; Yun, H.D.; Kim, S.W. Flexural performance of reinforced recycled aggregate concrete beams. Mag. Concr. Res. 2012, 64, 837–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Fonteboa, B.; Martínez-Abella, F. Shear strength of recycled concrete beams. Constr. Build. Mater. 2007, 21, 887–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Liu, B.; Zhang, C. Seismic behavior of recycled aggregate concrete beams under cyclic torsion. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 129, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Liu, B.; Zhang, C. Cyclic torsion performance of recycled aggregate concrete beams with or without fly ash. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 132, 529–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Liu, B.; Hui, Z.; Yiru, Q. Study on seismic behavior of recycled concrete members subjected to reversed torsion. J. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 2012, 32, 62–667. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Sarsam, F.K.; Salih, N.; Hussein, M. Assessment of reinforced recycling aggregate concrete beams under torsional moment. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2018, 7, 623–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, B. Study on seismic behavior of recycled concrete members subject to torsion under low frequency reversed load. J. Anhui Jianzhu Univ. 2014, 22, 25–28. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Ju, H.; Yerzhanov, M.; Serik, A.; Lee, D.; Kim, J.R. Statistical and reliability study on shear strength of recycled coarse aggregate reinforced concrete beams. Materials 2021, 14, 3321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rahal, K.N. Torsional strength of reinforced concrete beams. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 2000, 27, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ju, H.; Lee, D.; Zhang, W.; Wang, L. Torsional strength model of reinforced concrete members subjected to combined loads. Comput. Concr. 2022, 29, 285–301. [Google Scholar]
- Ju, H.; Lee, D. Nonlinear analysis of RC members subjected to combined torsion and bending moment. ACI Struct. J. 2021, 118, 55–70. [Google Scholar]
- Ju, H.; Han, S.J.; Kim, K.S. Analytical model for torsional behavior of RC members combined with bending, shear, and axial loads. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 32, 101730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ju, H.; Han, S.J.; Zhang, D.; Kim, J.; Wu, W.; Kim, K.S. Estimation of minimum torsional reinforcement of reinforced concrete and steel fiber-reinforced concrete members. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 2019, 4595363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, C.; Kim, S.; Kim, K.H.; Shin, D.; Haroon, M.; Lee, J.Y. Torsional behavior of reinforced concrete beams with high-strength steel bars. ACI Struct. J. 2019, 116, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ACI Committee 318. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary; ACI 318-19; ACI: Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Ju, H.; Lee, D.; Kim, K.H.; Yerzhanov, M.; Zhang, D.; Kim, J.R. Torsional design method used in Eurasia region: A comparative study. Struct. Concr. 2021, 22, 3798–3834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ref. | Beam Name | RCA (%) | fck (MPa) | fyl1 (MPa) | fyl2 (MPa) | fyt (MPa) | b (mm) | h (mm) | Al (mm2) | At (mm2) | xo (mm) | yo (mm) | s (mm) | Tcr (kN∙m) | Tu (kN∙m) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wang et al. [12] | NAC-1P | 0 | 22.20 | 455.3 | - | 298.1 | 200 | 300 | 157.1 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 6.44 | 10.86 |
NAC-1R | 0 | 22.20 | 455.3 | - | 298.1 | 200 | 300 | 157.1 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 6.37 | 10.21 | |
NAC-2P | 0 | 22.20 | 455.3 | - | 298.1 | 200 | 300 | 157.1 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 7.00 | 11.06 | |
NAC-2R | 0 | 22.20 | 455.3 | - | 298.1 | 200 | 300 | 157.1 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 6.93 | 10.01 | |
RAC-1P | 100 | 22.20 | 455.3 | - | 298.1 | 200 | 300 | 157.1 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 5.60 | 10.36 | |
RAC-1R | 100 | 22.20 | 455.3 | - | 298.1 | 200 | 300 | 157.1 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 5.46 | 10.61 | |
RAC-2P | 100 | 22.20 | 455.3 | - | 298.1 | 200 | 300 | 157.1 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 5.53 | 10.50 | |
RAC-2R | 100 | 22.20 | 455.3 | - | 298.1 | 200 | 300 | 157.1 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 5.53 | 10.71 | |
Wang et al. [13] | rAC-1-1,2P | 100 | 28.2 | 467.0 | 550.0 | 420.0 | 200 | 300 | 804.3 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 7.14 | 14.46 |
rAC-1-1,2R | 100 | 28.2 | 467.0 | 550.0 | 420.0 | 200 | 300 | 804.3 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 7.38 | 16.20 | |
MRAC-1-1,2P | 100 | 28.2 | 467.0 | 550.0 | 420.0 | 200 | 300 | 804.3 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 6.90 | 13.60 | |
MRAC-1--1,2R | 100 | 28.2 | 467.0 | 550.0 | 420.0 | 200 | 300 | 804.3 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 6.88 | 13.41 | |
rAC-2-0,9P | 100 | 32.2 | 467.0 | 550.0 | 420.0 | 200 | 300 | 804.3 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 7.29 | 14.86 | |
rAC-2-0,9R | 100 | 32.2 | 467.0 | 550.0 | 420.0 | 200 | 300 | 804.3 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 7.46 | 16.78 | |
MRAC-2-0,9P | 100 | 32.2 | 467.0 | 550.0 | 420.0 | 200 | 300 | 804.3 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 6.91 | 11.10 | |
MRAC-2-0,9R | 100 | 32.2 | 467.0 | 550.0 | 420.0 | 200 | 300 | 804.3 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 6.50 | 14.02 | |
rAC-3-0,6P | 100 | 32.2 | 467.0 | 550.0 | 420.0 | 200 | 300 | 804.3 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 6.87 | 14.33 | |
rAC-3-0,6R | 100 | 32.2 | 467.0 | 550.0 | 420.0 | 200 | 300 | 804.3 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 6.58 | 17.09 | |
MRAC-3-0,6P | 100 | 32.2 | 467.0 | 550.0 | 420.0 | 200 | 300 | 804.3 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 5.15 | 8.76 | |
MRAC-3-0,6R | 100 | 32.2 | 467.0 | 550.0 | 420.0 | 200 | 300 | 804.3 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 6.40 | 14.00 | |
Wang et al. [14] | RAC-1 | 100 | 25.7 | 298.1 | - | 455.3 | 200 | 300 | 157.1 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 5.60 | 8.81 |
RAC-1R | 100 | 25.7 | 298.1 | - | 455.3 | 200 | 300 | 157.1 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 5.46 | 9.02 | |
RAC-2 | 100 | 25.7 | 298.1 | - | 455.3 | 200 | 300 | 157.1 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 5.53 | 8.93 | |
RAC-2R | 100 | 25.7 | 298.1 | - | 455.3 | 200 | 300 | 157.1 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 5.53 | 9.10 | |
Sarsam et al. [15] | 25NC | 0 | 25.0 | 490.0 | - | 510.0 | 100 | 200 | 157.1 | 28.3 | 72 | 172 | 50 | 1.62 | 4.68 |
45NC | 0 | 46.0 | 490.0 | - | 510.0 | 100 | 200 | 157.1 | 28.3 | 72 | 172 | 50 | 2.16 | 5.22 | |
70NC | 0 | 70.0 | 490.0 | - | 510.0 | 100 | 200 | 157.1 | 28.3 | 72 | 172 | 50 | 2.88 | 5.58 | |
25R50 | 50 | 24.0 | 490.0 | - | 510.0 | 100 | 200 | 157.1 | 28.3 | 72 | 172 | 50 | 1.62 | 4.68 | |
45R50 | 50 | 44.0 | 490.0 | - | 510.0 | 100 | 200 | 157.1 | 28.3 | 72 | 172 | 50 | 2.16 | 5.04 | |
70R50 | 50 | 68.0 | 490.0 | - | 510.0 | 100 | 200 | 157.1 | 28.3 | 72 | 172 | 50 | 2.88 | 5.40 | |
25R100 | 100 | 22.3 | 490.0 | - | 510.0 | 100 | 200 | 157.1 | 28.3 | 72 | 172 | 50 | 1.52 | 4.32 | |
45R100 | 100 | 42.0 | 490.0 | - | 510.0 | 100 | 200 | 157.1 | 28.3 | 72 | 172 | 50 | 1.98 | 4.86 | |
70R100 | 100 | 60.0 | 490.0 | - | 510.0 | 100 | 200 | 157.1 | 28.3 | 72 | 172 | 50 | 2.52 | 5.22 | |
Li et al. [16] | RCN-1 | 100 | 25.7 | 550.0 | - | 420.0 | 200 | 300 | 603.2 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 5.20 | 12.40 |
RCN-4 | 100 | 25.7 | 550.0 | - | 420.0 | 200 | 300 | 603.2 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 4.70 | 11.05 | |
RCN-1R | 100 | 25.7 | 550.0 | - | 420.0 | 200 | 300 | 603.2 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 5.50 | 13.60 | |
RCN-4R | 100 | 25.7 | 550.0 | - | 420.0 | 200 | 300 | 603.2 | 50.3 | 160 | 260 | 100 | 5.00 | 12.00 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ju, H.; Serik, A. Torsional Strength of Recycled Coarse Aggregate Reinforced Concrete Beams. CivilEng 2023, 4, 55-64. https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng4010004
Ju H, Serik A. Torsional Strength of Recycled Coarse Aggregate Reinforced Concrete Beams. CivilEng. 2023; 4(1):55-64. https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng4010004
Chicago/Turabian StyleJu, Hyunjin, and Alina Serik. 2023. "Torsional Strength of Recycled Coarse Aggregate Reinforced Concrete Beams" CivilEng 4, no. 1: 55-64. https://doi.org/10.3390/civileng4010004