Spatiotemporal Modeling and Prediction of Urban Thermal Field Variation and Land Use Dynamics in Riyadh Using Machine Learning and Remote Sensing
Abstract
1. Introduction
- (a)
- To develop and implement advanced machine learning algorithms for predicting UTFVI changes in Riyadh, incorporating LULC and LST data.
- (b)
- To analyze the complex relationships between LULCC, LST variations, and UTFVI patterns in the context of Riyadh’s rapid urban growth.
- (c)
- To quantify the impact of urban expansion and land use changes on UTFVI and thermal stress levels in Riyadh.
- (d)
- To provide actionable insights and recommendations for sustainable urban planning and climate adaptation strategies based on UTFVI predictions and their relationship to LULC and LST.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Methods
2.3. Data Collection and Processing
2.3.1. Classification of LULC Images
2.3.2. Accuracy Assessment
2.4. Estimation of Seasonal LST
2.4.1. Estimation of LST Using Landsat 5 Images
2.4.2. Estimation of LST Using Landsat 8 Imagery
2.5. Calculation of Seasonal UHI and UTFVI
2.6. Estimating Process of LULC Maps
2.6.1. Estimating in MOLUSCE Plugin
2.6.2. Evaluation of the Seasonal LST and UTFVI Processes
2.6.3. Evaluating the Efficiency of the Models
2.6.4. ANN Forecasting Algorithm
2.6.5. Determining the Quantity of Secret Layers and Connections
3. Results
3.1. Accuracy Assessment
3.2. Monitoring LULC Transitions
3.3. Change in Summer and Winter LST
3.4. The UTFVI Range Varies According to the Time of 1993 to 2023
3.5. Forecasting LULC Change
3.6. Validation of Estimated LST
3.7. Forecasting of Seasonal LST
3.8. Forecasting of Seasonal UTFVI
4. Discussion
4.1. Urbanization and Thermal Stress
4.2. Seasonal Temperature Variations
4.3. Policy Implications
4.4. Implications and Future Research
4.5. Model Uncertainties and Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
| Year | Class | Vegetation | Barren Land | Built-Up | Total Map | User Accuracy | Producer Accuracy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | Vegetation | 445 | 23 | 41 | 509 | 86.00% | 89.00% | |
| Barren land | 20 | 445 | 34 | 499 | 88.00% | 89.00% | ||
| Built-up | 35 | 32 | 425 | 492 | 85.00% | 85.00% | ||
| Total reference | 500 | 500 | 500 | 1500 | ||||
| Accuracy | OA: 85.2% | Kappa: 86.2% | ||||||
| 2003 | Vegetation | 440 | 30 | 45 | 515 | 88.00% | 88.00% | |
| Barren land | 30 | 430 | 55 | 515 | 86.00% | 86.00% | ||
| Built-up | 30 | 40 | 400 | 470 | 88.00% | 80.00% | ||
| Total reference | 500 | 500 | 500 | 1500 | ||||
| Accuracy | OA: 84.2% | Kappa: 88.1% | ||||||
| 2013 | Vegetation | 425 | 61 | 6 | 492 | 88.00% | 85.00% | |
| Barren land | 24 | 425 | 49 | 498 | 87.00% | 85.00% | ||
| Built-up | 51 | 14 | 445 | 510 | 89.00% | 89.00% | ||
| Total reference | 500 | 500 | 500 | 1500 | ||||
| Accuracy | OA: 85.7% | Kappa: 89.3% | ||||||
| 2023 | Vegetation | 440 | 30 | 42 | 512 | 86.00% | 88.00% | |
| Barren land | 28 | 445 | 33 | 506 | 88.00% | 89.00% | ||
| Built-up | 32 | 25 | 425 | 482 | 88.00% | 85.00% | ||
| Total reference | 500 | 500 | 500 | 1500 | ||||
| Accuracy | OA: 83.4% | Kappa: 87.1% | ||||||
| Year | Season | LULC Proportions (%) | Mean LST (°C) | UTFVI Class Proportions (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vegetation | Barren | Built-Up | None | Weak | Middle | Strong | Stronger | Strongest | |||
| 1993 | Summer | 0.77 | 88.31 | 10.83 | 40.05 | 44.73 | 6.55 | 6.94 | 6.93 | 6.4 | 28.44 |
| Winter | 0.77 | 88.31 | 10.83 | 22.35 | 50.43 | 2.41 | 2.29 | 2.3 | 2.51 | 40.06 | |
| 2003 | Summer | 0.67 | 85.75 | 13.51 | 41.22 | 45.28 | 6.7 | 7.33 | 7.1 | 6.36 | 27.22 |
| Winter | 0.67 | 85.75 | 13.51 | 22.63 | 46.56 | 3.23 | 2.55 | 4.01 | 2.69 | 40.95 | |
| 2013 | Summer | 1.12 | 83.73 | 15.07 | 43.94 | 50.11 | 6.96 | 6.84 | 6.34 | 5.73 | 24.01 |
| Winter | 1.12 | 83.73 | 15.07 | 23.35 | 46.25 | 2.69 | 2.75 | 2.86 | 2.96 | 42.49 | |
| 2023 | Summer | 0.67 | 79.61 | 19.56 | 44.08 | 46.55 | 5.39 | 5.71 | 5.94 | 6.06 | 30.36 |
| Winter | 0.67 | 79.61 | 19.56 | 24.48 | 50.56 | 1.12 | 1.14 | 1.18 | 1.22 | 44.77 | |
Appendix B



References
- Chapman, S.; Watson, J.E.M.; Salazar, A.; Thatcher, M.; McAlpine, C.A. The impact of urbanization and climate change on urban temperatures: A systematic review. Landsc. Ecol. 2017, 32, 1921–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miky, Y.H. Remote sensing analysis for surface urban heat island detection over Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Appl. Geomat. 2019, 11, 243–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miky, Y.; Al Shouny, A.; Abdallah, A. Studying the Impact of Urban Management Strategies and Spatiotemporal Dynamics of LULC on Land Surface Temperature and SUHI Formation in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hegazy, I.R.; Qurnfulah, E.M. Thermal comfort of urban spaces using simulation tools exploring street orientation influence of on the outdoor thermal comfort: A case study of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Low-Carbon Technol. 2020, 15, 594–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.S.; Mohiuddin, H.; Kafy, A.-A.; Sheel, P.K.; Di, L. Classification of cities in Bangladesh based on remote sensing derived spatial characteristics. J. Urban Manag. 2019, 8, 206–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, J.; Di, L.; Rahman, M.S.; Yu, Z. Spatial–temporal landscape pattern change under rapid urbanization. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 2019, 13, 024503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Q.; Huang, J.; Yang, X.; Fang, C.; Liang, Y. Quantifying the seasonal contribution of coupling urban land use types on Urban Heat Island using Land Contribution Index: A case study in Wuhan, China. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 44, 666–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Kafy, A.; Rahman, M.S.; Faisal, A.-A.; Hasan, M.M.; Islam, M. Modelling future land use land cover changes and their impacts on land surface temperatures in Rajshahi, Bangladesh. Remote Sens. Appl. 2020, 18, 100314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, T.; Zhang, J.; Prodhan, F.A.; Sharma, T.P.P.; Bashir, B. Surface Urban Heat Islands Dynamics in Response to LULC and Vegetation across South Asia (2000–2019). Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tomlinson, C.J.; Chapman, L.; Thornes, J.E.; Baker, C.J. Including the urban heat island in spatial heat health risk assessment strategies: A case study for Birmingham, UK. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2011, 10, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Tsou, J.; Li, Y. Surface Urban Heat Island Analysis of Shanghai (China) Based on the Change of Land Use and Land Cover. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sejati, A.W.; Buchori, I.; Rudiarto, I. The spatio-temporal trends of urban growth and surface urban heat islands over two decades in the Semarang Metropolitan Region. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 46, 101432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, J.; Sekharan, S.; Karmakar, S.; Ghosh, S.; Zope, P.E.; Eldho, T.I. Spatio-temporal analysis of sub-hourly rainfall over Mumbai, India: Is statistical forecasting futile? J. Earth Syst. Sci. 2017, 126, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, D.X.; Pla, F.; Latorre-Carmona, P.; Myint, S.W.; Caetano, M.; Kieu, H.V. Characterizing the relationship between land use land cover change and land surface temperature. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2017, 124, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Losiri, C.; Nagai, M.; Ninsawat, S.; Shrestha, R. Modeling Urban Expansion in Bangkok Metropolitan Region Using Demographic–Economic Data through Cellular Automata-Markov Chain and Multi-Layer Perceptron-Markov Chain Models. Sustainability 2016, 8, 686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Ageili, M.; Mouhoub, M.; Piwowar, J. Remote Sensing, Gis and Cellular Automata for Urban Growth Simulation. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2017, 10, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shatnawi, N.; Qdais, H.A. Mapping urban land surface temperature using remote sensing techniques and artificial neural network modelling. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2019, 40, 3968–3983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliver, T.H.; Roy, D.B. The pitfalls of ecological forecasting. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2015, 115, 767–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gómez, J.A.; Guan, C.; Tripathy, P.; Duque, J.C.; Passos, S.; Keith, M.; Liu, J. Analyzing the Spatiotemporal Uncertainty in Urbanization Predictions. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AlQahtany, A. People’s perceptions of sustainable housing in developing countries: The case of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Hous. Care Support 2020, 23, 93–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansour, S. Spatial analysis of public health facilities in Riyadh Governorate, Saudi Arabia: A GIS-based study to assess geographic variations of service provision and accessibility. Geo-Spat. Inf. Sci. 2016, 19, 26–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alvares, C.A.; Stape, J.L.; Sentelhas, P.C.; de Moraes Gonçalves, J.L.; Sparovek, G. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol. Z. 2013, 22, 711–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, L.; Oppenheimer, M.; Zhu, Q.; Baldwin, J.W.; Ebi, K.L.; Bou-Zeid, E.; Guan, K.; Liu, X. Interactions between urban heat islands and heat waves. Environ. Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 034003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vanderbilt, D. The Mukaab: Inside Saudi Arabia’s $50 Billion Cube and Why It Was Suspended. 2026. Available online: https://vision2030.ai/ (accessed on 8 March 2026).
- Mazzetto, S.; Furlan, R.; Awwaad, R. Sustainable Urban Renewal: Planning Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) in Riyadh. Sustainability 2025, 17, 4310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khogali, H.A.M. Development of Heritage Places under Unesco Guidelines Case Study: Al Maliha Neighbourhood in Riyadh City. Int. J. Glob. Sustain. 2017, 1, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohajerani, A.; Bakaric, J.; Jeffrey-Bailey, T. The urban heat island effect, its causes, and mitigation, with reference to the thermal properties of asphalt concrete. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 197, 522–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gutman, G.; Huang, C.; Chander, G.; Noojipady, P.; Masek, J.G. Assessment of the NASA–USGS Global Land Survey (GLS) datasets. Remote Sens. Environ. 2013, 134, 249–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, D.P.; Ju, J.; Kline, K.; Scaramuzza, P.L.; Kovalskyy, V.; Hansen, M.; Loveland, T.R.; Vermote, E.; Zhang, C. Web-enabled Landsat Data (WELD): Landsat ETM+ composited mosaics of the conterminous United States. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010, 114, 35–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fariha, J.N.; Miah, M.T.; Limon, Z.A.; Alsulamy, S.; Al Kafy, A.; Rahman, S.N. Quantifying spatial dynamics of urban sprawl for climate resilience sustainable natural resource management by utilizing geostatistical and remote sensing techniques. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2024, 155, 6307–6349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miah, M.T.; Fariha, J.N.; Al Kafy, A.; Islam, R.; Biswas, N.; Duti, B.M.; Fattah, A.; Alsulamy, S.; Khedher, K.M.; Salem, M.A. Exploring the nexus between land cover change dynamics and spatial heterogeneity of demographic trajectories in rapidly growing ecosystems of south Asian cities. Ecol. Indic. 2024, 158, 111299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakraborty, A.; Sachdeva, K.; Joshi, P.K. A Reflection on Image Classifications for Forest Ecology Management: Towards Landscape Mapping and Monitoring. In Handbook of Neural Computation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 67–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arifeen, H.M.; Phoungthong, K.; Mostafaeipour, A.; Yuangyai, N.; Yuangyai, C.; Techato, K.; Jutidamrongphan, W. Determine the Land-Use Land-Cover Changes, Urban Expansion and Their Driving Factors for Sustainable Development in Gazipur Bangladesh. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foody, G.M. Explaining the unsuitability of the kappa coefficient in the assessment and comparison of the accuracy of thematic maps obtained by image classification. Remote Sens. Environ. 2020, 239, 111630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tassi, A.; Vizzari, M. Object-Oriented LULC Classification in Google Earth Engine Combining SNIC, GLCM, and Machine Learning Algorithms. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, Y.; Zeng, G.; Pan, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Li, K. A Prediction Model for High Risk of Positive RT-PCR Test Results in COVID-19 Patients Discharged from Wuhan Leishenshan Hospital, China. Front. Public Health 2021, 9, 778539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Qian, J.; Yue, H. Comparison and evaluation of different dryness indices based on vegetation indices-land surface temperature/albedo feature space. Adv. Space Res. 2021, 68, 2791–2803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heagerty, P.J.; Lumley, T.; Pepe, M.S. Time-Dependent ROC Curves for Censored Survival Data and a Diagnostic Marker. Biometrics 2000, 56, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walter, S.D. The partial area under the summary ROC curve. Stat. Med. 2005, 24, 2025–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasul, A.; Balzter, H.; Smith, C. Spatial variation of the daytime Surface Urban Cool Island during the dry season in Erbil, Iraqi Kurdistan, from Landsat 8. Urban Clim. 2015, 14, 176–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rozenstein, O.; Qin, Z.; Derimian, Y.; Karnieli, A. Derivation of Land Surface Temperature for Landsat-8 TIRS Using a Split Window Algorithm. Sensors 2014, 14, 5768–5780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scarano, M.; Sobrino, J.A. On the relationship between the sky view factor and the land surface temperature derived by Landsat-8 images in Bari, Italy. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2015, 36, 4820–4835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, S.; Sowgat, T.; Ahmed, M.U.; Islam, S.T.; Anjum, N.; Mondal, J.; Rahman, M.M. Bangladesh: National Urban Policies and City Profiles for Dhaka and Khulna; GCRF Centre for Sustainable, Healthy and Learning Cities and Neighborhood (SHLC): Glasgow, UK, 2018; Available online: https://centreforsustainablecities.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Executive-Summary-Bangladesh-National-Urban-Policies-and-City-Profiles-for-Dhaka-and-Khulna.pdf (accessed on 10 January 2026).
- Weng, Q.; Lu, D.; Schubring, J. Estimation of land surface temperature–vegetation abundance relationship for urban heat island studies. Remote Sens. Environ. 2004, 89, 467–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, S.; Pandit, S.; Eva, E.A.; Bagmar, S.H.; Papia, M.; Banik, L.; Dube, T.; Rahman, F.; Razi, M.A. Examining the nexus between land surface temperature and urban growth in Chattogram Metropolitan Area of Bangladesh using long term Landsat series data. Urban Clim. 2020, 32, 100593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, X.; Guo, X.; Wu, Z. Land Surface Temperature Retrieval from Landsat 8 TIRS—Comparison between Radiative Transfer Equation-Based Method, Split Window Algorithm and Single Channel Method. Remote Sens. 2014, 6, 9829–9852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avdan, U.; Jovanovska, G. Algorithm for Automated Mapping of Land Surface Temperature Using LANDSAT 8 Satellite Data. J. Sens. 2016, 2016, 1480307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abutaleb, K.; Ngie, A.; Darwish, A.; Ahmed, M.; Arafat, S.; Ahmed, F. Assessment of Urban Heat Island Using Remotely Sensed Imagery over Greater Cairo, Egypt. Adv. Remote Sens. 2015, 4, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, L.; Zhang, Y. Urban Heat Island Analysis Using the Landsat TM Data and ASTER Data: A Case Study in Hong Kong. Remote Sens. 2011, 3, 1535–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, S.; Ahmad, K.; Sajjad, R.U.; Abbasi, A.M.; Nazeer, A.; Tahir, A.A. Analysis and simulation of land cover changes and their impacts on land surface temperature in a lower Himalayan region. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 245, 348–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santé, I.; García, A.M.; Miranda, D.; Crecente, R. Cellular automata models for the simulation of real-world urban processes: A review and analysis. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2010, 96, 108–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, A.K.M.A. Bright City Lights and Slums of Dhaka city: Determinants of rural-urban migration in Bangladesh. Migr. Lett. 2004, 1, 26–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, C.; Schmitt, M.; Mou, L.; Ghamisi, P.; Zhu, X. Feature Importance Analysis for Local Climate Zone Classification Using a Residual Convolutional Neural Network with Multi-Source Datasets. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansour, S.; Al-Belushi, M.; Al-Awadhi, T. Monitoring land use and land cover changes in the mountainous cities of Oman using GIS and CA-Markov modelling techniques. Land Use Policy 2020, 91, 104414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sekertekin, A.; Arslan, N.; Bilgili, M. Modeling Diurnal Land Surface Temperature on a Local Scale of an Arid Environment Using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Time Series of Landsat-8 Derived Spectral Indexes. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 2020, 206, 105328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.; Jung, S.; Lee, J. Prediction Model Based on an Artificial Neural Network for User-Based Building Energy Consumption in South Korea. Energies 2019, 12, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilbert, K.M.; Shi, Y. Land Use/Land Cover Changes Detection in Lagos City of Nigeria Using Remote Sensing and GIS. Adv. Remote Sens. 2023, 12, 145–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ID, M. Simulation and Prediction of Land Surface Temperature (LST) Dynamics within Ikom City in Nigeria Using Artificial Neural Network (ANN). J. Remote Sens. GIS 2015, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Carvalho, R.M.; Szlafsztein, C.F. Urban vegetation loss and ecosystem services: The influence on climate regulation and noise and air pollution. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 245, 844–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klingmann, A. Rescripting Riyadh: How the capital of Saudi Arabia employs urban megaprojects as catalysts to enhance the quality of life within the city’s neighborhoods. J. Place Manag. Dev. 2023, 16, 45–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.T. Land Use and Land Cover Changes and Urban Sprawl in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: An Analysis Using Multi-Temporal Landsat Data and Shannon’s Entropy Index. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2016, XLI-B8, 1017–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almazroui, M.; Islam, M.N.; Jones, P.D. Urbanization effects on the air temperature rise in Saudi Arabia. Clim. Change 2013, 120, 109–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohamed, A.; Lorestani, N.; Shabani, F. Impact of urbanization on land surface temperature: A global perspective. Curr. Res. Environ. Sustain. 2025, 10, 100315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siddiqui, A.; Maske, A.B.; Khan, A.; Kar, A.; Bhatt, M.; Bharadwaj, V.; Kant, Y.; Hamdi, R. An Urban Climate Paradox of Anthropogenic Heat Flux and Urban Cool Island in a Semi-Arid Urban Environment. Atmosphere 2025, 16, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munir, S.; Habeebullah, T.M.A.; Zamreeq, A.O.; Alfehaid, M.M.A.; Ismail, M.; Khalil, A.A.; Baligh, A.A.; Islam, M.N.; Jamaladdin, S.; Ghulam, A.S. Cooling of Maximum Temperatures in Six Saudi Arabian Cities (1994–2024)—Reversal of Urban Heat Islands. Urban Sci. 2025, 9, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.T. Examining and Modelling the Determinants of the Rising Land Surface Temperatures in Arabian Desert Cities: An Example from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J. Settl. Spat. Plan. 2018, 9, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neteler, M. Estimating Daily Land Surface Temperatures in Mountainous Environments by Reconstructed MODIS LST Data. Remote Sens. 2010, 2, 333–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Kafy, A.; Al-Faisal, A.; Hasan, M.M.; Sikdar, S.; Khan, M.H.H.; Rahman, M.; Islam, R. Impact of LULC Changes on LST in Rajshahi District of Bangladesh: A Remote Sensing Approach. J. Geogr. Stud. 2020, 3, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.-L.; Zhao, H.-M.; Li, P.-X.; Yin, Z.-Y. Remote sensing image-based analysis of the relationship between urban heat island and land use/cover changes. Remote Sens. Environ. 2006, 104, 133–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dar, I.; Qadir, J.; Shukla, A. Estimation of LST from multi-sensor thermal remote sensing data and evaluating the influence of sensor characteristics. Ann. GIS 2019, 25, 263–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IPCC. Mitigation of climate change. In Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Ramachandran, R.M.; Roy, P.S.; Chakravarthi, V.; Joshi, P.K.; Sanjay, J. Land use and climate change impacts on distribution of plant species of conservation value in Eastern Ghats, India: A simulation study. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2020, 192, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Peng, L.L.H.; Jiang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Yao, L.; He, Y.; Xu, T. Impact of urban heat island on energy demand in buildings: Local climate zones in Nanjing. Appl. Energy 2020, 260, 114279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santamouris, M. Recent progress on urban overheating and heat island research. Integrated assessment of the energy, environmental, vulnerability and health impact. Synergies with the global climate change. Energy Build. 2020, 207, 109482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.S.; Ullah, S.; Sun, T.; Rehman, A.; Chen, L. Land-Use/Land-Cover Changes and Its Contribution to Urban Heat Island: A Case Study of Islamabad, Pakistan. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jenerette, G.D.; Harlan, S.L.; Buyantuev, A.; Stefanov, W.L.; Declet-Barreto, J.; Ruddell, B.L.; Myint, S.W.; Kaplan, S.; Li, X. Micro-scale urban surface temperatures are related to land-cover features and residential heat related health impacts in Phoenix, AZ USA. Landsc. Ecol. 2016, 31, 745–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haashemi, S.; Weng, Q.; Darvishi, A.; Alavipanah, S. Seasonal Variations of the Surface Urban Heat Island in a Semi-Arid City. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]















| Duration | Dataset | Bands | Detector | Geospatial Resolution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | Phase 2 Landsat 5 data, Acquisition 2 Tier 1 | 1 to 7 | Landsat 5 TM | 30 |
| 2003 | Phase 2 Landsat 5 data, Acquisition 2 Tier 1 | 1 to 7 | Landsat 5 TM | 30 |
| 2013 2023 | Phase 2 Landsat 8 data, Acquisition 2 Tier 1 | 2 to 7 | Landsat 8 OLI | 30 |
| LULC Type | Details |
|---|---|
| Built-Up | On roadways pavement, building sites, and around industries, inert gravel is often paved over. |
| Vegetation | Palm trees, Apple of Sodom, verdant landscapes, and scattered areas that comprise botanical variety; umbrella thorn; pencil cactus. |
| Bare Land | Rocks, deserted terrain, and uninhabited areas. |
| Year | Acquisition Date | Dataset | Bands | Sensor | Spatial Resolution | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winter | Summer | |||||
| 1993 | 11 December | 5 April | Stage 2, Landsat 5 | 1 to 7 | Landsat 5 TM | 30 |
| 2003 | 7 December | 3 April | 2 Stage, Landsat 7 | 2 to 7 | Landsat 7 ETM+ | 30 |
| 2013 | 13 January | 17 May | ||||
| 2023 | 21 December | 11 April | 2 Stage, Landsat 8 | 2 to 7 | Landsat 8 OLI | 30 |
| User Accuracy (%) | Producer Accuracy (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Vegetation | Barren Land | Built-Up | Vegetation | Barren Land | Built-Up | Overall Accuracy | Kappa Statistics |
| 1993 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 0.852 | 0.862 |
| 2003 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.80 | 0.842 | 0.881 |
| 2013 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 089 | 0.857 | 0.893 |
| 2023 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 0.834 | 0.871 |
| Year | Parameter | Vegetation | Barren Land | Built-Up | Accuracy | Macro Avg | Weighted Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | Precision | 0.860 | 0.880 | 0.893 | 0.832 | 0.858 | 0.867 |
| Recall | 0.873 | 0.880 | 0.875 | 0.852 | 0.870 | 0.852 | |
| F1-score | 0.899 | 0.867 | 0.883 | 0.862 | 0.840 | 0.881 | |
| 2003 | Precision | 0.880 | 0.844 | 0.870 | 0.858 | 0.891 | 0.859 |
| Recall | 0.846 | 0.880 | 0.858 | 0.858 | 0.883 | 0.858 | |
| F1-score | 0.872 | 0.871 | 0.899 | 0.878 | 0.845 | 0.857 | |
| 2013 | Precision | 0.890 | 0.860 | 0.883 | 0.892 | 0.858 | 0.857 |
| Recall | 0.833 | 0.860 | 0.875 | 0.832 | 0.827 | 0.832 | |
| F1-score | 0.889 | 0.847 | 0.903 | 0.862 | 0.840 | 0.871 | |
| 2023 | Precision | 0.878 | 0.880 | 0.984 | 0.859 | 0.861 | 0.864 |
| Recall | 0.878 | 0.886 | 0.863 | 0.909 | 0.857 | 0.869 | |
| F1-score | 0.878 | 0.880 | 0.880 | 0.889 | 0.857 | 0.859 |
| LULC | Built-Up | Vegetation | Barren Land | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | 646.64 | 46.04 | 5277.03 | 5969.71 |
| 2003 | 806.69 | 40.19 | 5122.82 | 5969.7 |
| 2013 | 899.49 | 66.74 | 5003.45 | 5969.7 |
| 2023 | 1168.26 | 40.28 | 4760.75 | 5969.71 |
| LULC | Built-Up (%) | Vegetation (%) | Barren Land (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | 10.83 | 0.771 | 88.31 |
| 2003 | 13.51 | 0.673 | 85.75 |
| 2013 | 15.06 | 1.117 | 83.73 |
| 2023 | 19.56 | 0.674 | 79.61 |
| Class | 1993–2003 | 2003–2013 | 2013–2023 | 2023–2033 | 2033–2043 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Built-up | 160.05 | 92.8 | 268.77 | 187.62 | 1.586 |
| Vegetation | −5.85 | 26.55 | −26.46 | −3.8 | 153.527 |
| Barren land | −152.92 | −120.05 | −246.42 | −181.24 | 3.757 |
| Year | Summer | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min (°C) | Q1 | Median | Q3 | Max (°C) | Mean (°C) | |
| 1993 | 23.28 | 33.05 | 40.50 | 49.50 | 56.7307 | 40.05 |
| 2003 | 24.20 | 34.57 | 41.22 | 50.23 | 58.25 | 41.22 |
| 2013 | 29.02 | 35.49 | 43.94 | 52.89 | 58.87 | 43.94 |
| 2023 | 28.27 | 36.88 | 44.08 | 53.66 | 59.89 | 44.08 |
| Year | Winter | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min (°C) | Q1 | Median | Q3 | Max (°C) | Mean (°C) | |
| 1993 | 13.32 | 18.91 | 22.35 | 26.57 | 30.75 | 22.35 |
| 2003 | 13.44 | 18.70 | 22.63 | 25.94 | 29.16 | 22.63 |
| 2013 | 14.65 | 19.45 | 23.35 | 26.93 | 31.62 | 23.35 |
| 2023 | 16.64 | 20.73 | 24.48 | 28.06 | 32.33 | 24.48 |
| Year | Summer Season LST Range in °C | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <38 | 38–<43 | 43–<48 | 48–<53 | ≥53 | ||||||
| Area (km2) | ||||||||||
| 1993 | 380.29 | 6.37 | 5506.52 | 92.24 | 82.683 | 1.385 | 0.08 | 0.0013 | 0.01 | 0.0002 |
| 2003 | 52.32 | 0.87 | 3331.17 | 55.80 | 2585.2 | 43.309 | 0.56 | 0.0093 | 0.03 | 0.0011 |
| 2013 | 24.92 | 0.41 | 3143.18 | 52.65 | 2799.0 | 46.88 | 2.49 | 0.041 | 0.04 | 0.0074 |
| 2023 | 12.34 | 0.20 | 398.26 | 6.67 | 5225.2 | 87.529 | 333.6 | 5.589 | 0.196 | 0.0032 |
| 2033 | 9.93 | 0.16 | 242.16 | 4.05 | 4583.7 | 76.784 | 1131 | 18.955 | 2.202 | 0.0369 |
| 2043 | 8.10 | 0.13 | 162.92 | 2.72 | 3429.7 | 57.401 | 2348 | 39.305 | 20.39 | 0.341 |
| Year | Winter Season LST Range in °C | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <15 | 15–<20 | 20–<25 | 25–<30 | ≥30 | ||||||
| Area (km2) | ||||||||||
| 1993 | 57.06 | 0.955 | 4643.22 | 77.78 | 1268.59 | 21.25 | 0.15 | 0.002 | 0.05 | 0.0008 |
| 2003 | 100.64 | 1.685 | 5091.53 | 85.28 | 777.34305 | 13.02 | 0.34 | 0.005 | 0.04 | 0.0006 |
| 2013 | 19.7 | 0.33 | 3879.77 | 64.99 | 2069.52 | 34.66 | 0.16 | 0.002 | 0.05 | 0.0008 |
| 2023 | 14.43 | 0.241 | 1149.41 | 19.25 | 4768.5 | 79.88 | 37.05 | 0.62 | 0.09 | 0.0016 |
| 2033 | 11.69 | 0.195 | 259.48 | 4.34 | 5502.48 | 92.17 | 195.76 | 3.27 | 0.34 | 0.005 |
| 2043 | 7.1 | 0.118 | 144.11 | 2.41 | 5035.29 | 84.35 | 780.69 | 13.07 | 2.3 | 0.03 |
| UTFVI | None | Weak | Middle | Strong | Stronger | Strongest | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Ranges | <0 | 0–0.005 | 0.005–0.010 | 0.010–0.015 | 0.015–0.020 | >0.020 |
| 1993 | Summer | 2670.27 | 391.163 | 414.29 | 413.76 | 381.93 | 1697.78 |
| Winter | 3010.5 | 143.64 | 136.47 | 137.44 | 149.65 | 2391.36 | |
| 2003 | Summer | 2703.25 | 400.04 | 437.72 | 423.63 | 379.89 | 1624.8 |
| Winter | 2779.79 | 193.1 | 152.51 | 239.23 | 160.84 | 2444.41 | |
| 2013 | Summer | 2991.59 | 415.68 | 408.38 | 378.66 | 342.24 | 1433.11 |
| Winter | 2761.08 | 160.39 | 164.23 | 170.57 | 176.48 | 2536.54 | |
| 2023 | Summer | 2778.71 | 321.8 | 340.69 | 354.34 | 361.74 | 1812.37 |
| Winter | 3018.44 | 67.12 | 67.99 | 70.167 | 72.9 | 2672.56 |
| LULC | Built-Up | Vegetation | Barren Land | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | % | |||||
| 2033 | 1355.88 | 22.71 | 36.48 | 0.611 | 4577.35 | 76.57 | 5969.71 |
| 2043 | 1509.407 | 25.28 | 40.237 | 0.674 | 4420.05 | 73.91 | 5969.70 |
| Year | Summer | Winter | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | 2003 | 2013 | 2023 | 1993 | 2003 | 2013 | 2023 | |||||||||
| Max | Min | Max | Min | Max | Min | Max | Min | Max | Min | Max | Min | Max | Min | Max | Min | |
| LST derived from thermal bands (°C) | 56.73 | 23.28 | 58.25 | 24.20 | 58.87 | 29.02 | 59.89 | 28.27 | 30.75 | 13.32 | 29.16 | 13.44 | 31.62 | 14.65 | 32.33 | 16.64 |
| SAMD recorded LST (°C) | 56.75 | 23.35 | 59.19 | 24.25 | 58.90 | 29.77 | 60.91 | 29.55 | 30.57 | 12.25 | 28.16 | 14.23 | 32.21 | 14.16 | 33.15 | 16.68 |
| Deviation (°C) | +0.02 | +0.07 | +0.94 | +0.05 | +0.03 | +0.75 | +1.02 | +1.28 | −0.18 | −1.07 | −1.00 | +0.79 | +0.59 | −0.49 | +0.82 | +0.04 |
| Average deviation | +0.05 | +0.50 | −0.39 | +1.15 | −0.63 | −0.11 | +0.05 | +0.43 | ||||||||
| Year | Summer | Winter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min (°C) | Max (°C) | Mean (°C) | Min (°C) | Max (°C) | Mean (°C) | |
| 2033 | 31.14 | 60.79 | 45.96 | 17.54 | 33.26 | 25.45 |
| 2043 | 33.12 | 61.52 | 47.32 | 18.98 | 34.48 | 26.73 |
| Year | Predicted Summer LST range in °C | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <38 | 38–<43 | 43–<48 | 48–<53 | ≥53 | ||||||
| Area (km2) | ||||||||||
| 2033 | 9.93 | 0.166 | 242.1 | 4.055 | 4583.7 | 76.78 | 1131.5 | 18.95 | 2.202 | 0.0006 |
| 2043 | 8.1 | 0.135 | 162.9 | 2.72 | 3429.7 | 57.45 | 2348.52 | 39.341 | 20.39 | 0.0057 |
| Predicted Winter LST range in °C | ||||||||||
| <15 | 15–<20 | 20–<25 | 25–<30 | ≥30 | ||||||
| Area (km2) | ||||||||||
| 2033 | 11.6 | 0.19 | 259.48 | 4.34 | 5502.4 | 92.17 | 195.7 | 3.27 | 0.343 | 0.0057 |
| 2043 | 7.1 | 0.11 | 144.11 | 2.41 | 5035.2 | 84.347 | 780.6 | 13.07 | 2.3 | 0.0385 |
| Prediction Year | Evaluation of QGIS-Based ANN–CA Models for LST Forecasting | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No of Hidden Layer | RMSE | R | |
| Summer 2023 | 6 | 0.759 | 0.93 |
| Winter 2023 | 6 | 0.789 | 0.87 |
| Year | UTFVI | None | Weak | Middle | Strong | Stronger | Strongest |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ranges | <0 | 0–0.005 | 0.005–0.010 | 0.010–0.015 | 0.015–0.020 | >0.020 | |
| 2033 | Summer | 2939.37 | 334.06 | 337.73 | 336.79 | 341.9 | 1680.039 |
| Winter | 2893.74 | 75.49 | 81.872 | 86.734 | 86.324 | 2745.159 | |
| 2043 | Summer | 3000.73 | 314.82 | 312.72 | 314.47 | 331.08 | 1695.24 |
| Winter | 2894.25 | 49.26 | 62.499 | 59.685 | 64.864 | 2838.73 | |
| 2023–2033 | Summer | −160.66 | −12.26 | 2.96 | 17.55 | 19.84 | 132.331 |
| Winter | 124.7 | −8.37 | −13.882 | −16.567 | −13.424 | −72.599 | |
| 2023–2043 | Summer | −222.02 | 6.98 | 27.97 | 39.87 | 30.66 | 117.13 |
| Winter | 124.19 | 17.86 | 5.491 | 10.482 | 8.036 | −166.17 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Miah, M.T.; Raiyan, R.; Almaimani, A.K.; Rahaman, K.R. Spatiotemporal Modeling and Prediction of Urban Thermal Field Variation and Land Use Dynamics in Riyadh Using Machine Learning and Remote Sensing. World 2026, 7, 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/world7030049
Miah MT, Raiyan R, Almaimani AK, Rahaman KR. Spatiotemporal Modeling and Prediction of Urban Thermal Field Variation and Land Use Dynamics in Riyadh Using Machine Learning and Remote Sensing. World. 2026; 7(3):49. https://doi.org/10.3390/world7030049
Chicago/Turabian StyleMiah, Md Tanvir, Raiyan Raiyan, Ayad Khalid Almaimani, and Khan Rubayet Rahaman. 2026. "Spatiotemporal Modeling and Prediction of Urban Thermal Field Variation and Land Use Dynamics in Riyadh Using Machine Learning and Remote Sensing" World 7, no. 3: 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/world7030049
APA StyleMiah, M. T., Raiyan, R., Almaimani, A. K., & Rahaman, K. R. (2026). Spatiotemporal Modeling and Prediction of Urban Thermal Field Variation and Land Use Dynamics in Riyadh Using Machine Learning and Remote Sensing. World, 7(3), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/world7030049

