Previous Article in Journal
Shadow Economy Drivers in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A MIMIC and SEM Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluating Conflict Management Strategies and Supply Chain Performance: A Systematic Literature Review Within Jordan’s Food Manufacturing Sector

by
Aydah Almasri
1,*,
Ma Ying
1,
Reem Aljaber
2 and
Jean Pierre Namahoro
3
1
Business Administration, School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Nanhu Campus, Wuhan 430070, China
2
Independent Researcher, Wuhan 430070, China
3
School of Economics and Management, China University of Gesciences Wuhan, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
World 2025, 6(2), 86; https://doi.org/10.3390/world6020086
Submission received: 15 May 2025 / Revised: 5 June 2025 / Accepted: 10 June 2025 / Published: 16 June 2025

Abstract

:
This systematic literature review explores how conflict management strategies (CMS) impact supply chain performance (SCP), focusing on the mediating roles of supply chain operational processes (SCOP) and customer-centric green supply chain management (CCGSCM) within Jordan’s food manufacturing sector. Framed within smart city initiatives and sustainable development goals (SDGs 9, 11, and 12), this study addresses critical gaps identified in the literature, particularly the lack of integrated examination of CMS impacts in emerging markets like Jordan. Utilizing thematic analysis, this review consolidates key findings across relevant studies from 2010 to 2025 sourced from top-tier databases. The results reveal that collaboration emerges as the most effective CMS strategy, enhancing stakeholder interactions, operational coordination, and resilience. SCOP significantly mediate CMS–SCP relationships, with logistics and inventory management notably vital in mitigating disruptions. Additionally, CCGSCM is highlighted as pivotal for sustainability and operational efficiency in post-COVID market conditions. The findings offer valuable insights for practitioners and policymakers, providing strategic recommendations for integrating technology-driven and relationship-focused CMS tailored to Jordan’s unique socio-economic context, thereby aligning operational practices with global sustainability goals (SDGs 9, 11, and 12).

1. Introduction

Strategic industrial planning through smart city initiatives is vital for sustainable infrastructure and production, aligning with SDGs 9, 11, and 12 [1,2,3]. However, practical implementation of these initiatives in dynamic sectors, particularly concerning their comprehensive societal impact and ability to address intricate urban challenges, often involves complex conceptual developments that warrant critical examination beyond mere descriptive enumeration [1,4,5]. The sector faces significant challenges due to resource scarcity, fragmented regulations, and operational inefficiencies, resulting in frequent stakeholder conflicts [6,7,8]. Thus, effective conflict management strategies (CMS) are crucial for enhancing collaboration, operational efficiency, and resilience against disruptions [9].
While CMS have been widely explored within well-established markets [10,11], research specific to Jordan’s socio-economic and geopolitical context remains limited [12,13]. Additionally, previous studies have independently examined supply chain operational processes (SCOP) and customer-centric green supply chain management (CCGSCM) but have not investigated their combined mediating roles between CMS and supply chain performance (SCP), especially within industries prioritizing sustainability [5,14].
Addressing this gap, this study leverages stakeholder theory [15] and conflict management theory [16] to explore how CMS influence SCP through SCOP and CCGSCM mediation. Given recent reports highlighting significant operational inefficiencies from unresolved supply chain conflicts among Jordanian food manufacturers [17], the urgency of this investigation is evident. Therefore, through a systematic, integrative literature review, this paper aims to identify effective CMS practices, highlight the mediating influences of SCOP and CCGSCM, and offer valuable theoretical and practical insights tailored specifically to emerging markets like Jordan.

2. Methodology

This study employed a rigorous systematic literature review (SLR), adopting an integrative thematic synthesis approach [18,19] to investigate the impact of conflict management strategies (CMS) on supply chain performance (SCP) mediated by supply chain operational processes (SCOP) and customer-centric green supply chain management (CCGSCM) within Jordan’s food manufacturing sector. This integrative approach is particularly suited for synthesizing diverse qualitative, quantitative, and conceptual studies in complex business domains, ensuring comprehensive knowledge synthesis while maintaining methodological rigor and transparency.

2.1. Search Strategy and Study Selection

A structured and transparent literature search process, following a three-phase selection approach (identification, screening, and inclusion), was conducted across top-tier academic databases. These included Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Emerald Insight, and Google Scholar, supplemented by reputable institutional reports (e.g., World Bank, United Nations). The search period was strictly limited to peer-reviewed empirical research published between 2010 and 2025.
Search terms were carefully developed and combined using Boolean logic (AND, OR) to ensure both relevance and breadth. Key terms included, but were not limited to: “conflict management strategies”, “supply chain operational performance”, “Jordanian industrial sector”, and “green supply chain management”.
The study selection process is comprehensively detailed in a PRISMA-style flow diagram (Figure 1). This diagram illustrates the rigorous screening and selection of articles. Initially, a total of 3500 records were identified across all databases. From Web of Science and Scopus, 1907 records were identified. An additional 6 records were identified through other sources (e.g., governmental reports, institutional publications, industry reports). After removing duplicates, 2380 unique records remained. These records underwent title and abstract screening, resulting in the exclusion of 1500 articles that were clearly relevant or did not meet initial screening criteria. The full texts of the remaining 880 articles were then retrieved and meticulously assessed for eligibility against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.

2.2. Data Extraction and Thematic Synthesis

Data extraction from the included studies involved a structured approach to capture relevant information pertaining to CMS impacts, the mediating roles of SCOP and CCGSCM, and SCP outcomes. For comprehensive data synthesis, NVivo 12 (QSR International) software was employed for qualitative data coding. The thematic synthesis process followed established guidelines [20] and involved several iterative steps: (1) familiarization with the data through repeated reading; (2) initial coding of relevant data segments; (3) grouping initial codes into potential overarching themes; (4) refining and reviewing topics; and (5) defining and naming themes, categorized into key areas: CMS impacts, mediating roles of SCOP and CCGSCM, and SCP outcomes. This rigorous process systematically consolidated findings, identified patterns, and synthesized diverse empirical evidence to answer the study’s research questions and build robust conceptual insights. The relationships between these themes were also analyzed to determine interdependencies and how CMS influence SCOP and SCP.

2.3. Quality Appraisal and Justification for Excluding Meta-Analysis

To ensure the validity and reliability of the included studies, a systematic quality assessment was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tool [21] and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) [22]. Each study was evaluated based on research design rigor, theoretical grounding, empirical robustness, and applicability to real-world supply chains. Only studies demonstrating methodological transparency and empirical support were retained for synthesis.
A meta-analysis was considered impractical [23,24] due to significant methodological and conceptual heterogeneity among the studies included. This heterogeneity manifested in three key areas:
1.
Variability in CMS Definitions: Different studies categorized CMS under varying theoretical frameworks (e.g., Rahim’s five-strategy model [14], stakeholder conflict models [15,25], resource dependence theory [26]), making direct quantitative comparisons inconsistent.
2.
Divergent Measurement of SCP: SCP is often measured through operational efficiency indicators, but studies use inconsistent KPI frameworks (e.g., cost efficiency, flexibility, and responsiveness). Prior systematic reviews on SCP (e.g., [27,28]) have highlighted the challenge of harmonizing non-standardized measurement scales, which precludes meaningful statistical aggregation.
3.
Diversity in Research Methodologies: The dataset included qualitative case studies, survey-based empirical studies, and mixed-method research, many of which lacked standardized effect sizes (e.g., [18]. Similar challenges in meta-analysis feasibility have been documented in SCM literature (e.g., [27,29], where methodological diversity prevents statistical pooling.
Given these inconsistencies, conducting a meta-analysis would have led to biased or misleading conclusions. Instead, the chosen integrative thematic synthesis approach utilizing thematic synthesis [20] and comparative analysis allowed for a deeper conceptual interpretation of findings rather than relying on statistical aggregation. This robust method effectively minimized potential biases inherent in combining heterogeneous studies, ensuring that our analysis moved beyond mere description to provide nuanced insights and address the ‘to what’ query by building a cohesive understanding from disparate findings. An initial feasibility assessment further confirmed the impracticality of statistical synthesis.

2.4. Limitations of the Methodology

Despite the robust selection and synthesis process, certain limitations exist that could impact generalizability. These include the exclusion of non-English studies, potentially limiting cross-cultural perspectives, and the geographical focus bias toward Jordan’s industrial sector, which may constrain direct generalizability to other global contexts.

3. Literature Research and Results

3.1. Theoretical Background

This study employs five theoretical lenses to analyze CMS in Jordan’s food manufacturing. Social exchange theory (SET) [30,31] highlights reciprocal trust, crucial for collaborative CMS strategies in Jordan’s relationship-focused market. Resource dependence theory (RDT) [26] helps manage Jordan’s reliance on imported resources through strategic conflict resolution. Game theory [32] provides insights into strategic interactions in Jordan’s fragmented market. Conflict theory [33,34,35] explains power dynamics and resource conflicts, showing how large stakeholders influence smaller manufacturers. Finally, stakeholder theory [15,25] stresses balancing diverse interests, vital in Jordan’s complex regulatory environment. These theories collectively illuminate how CMS impact supply chain operations and performance, fostering efficiency and resilience. Specifically, they offer a multi-faceted lens to dissect the intricate interplay between conflict dynamics, operational processes, green practices, and overall supply chain outcomes in emerging markets. This comprehensive theoretical integration is crucial for addressing the identified research gaps by providing a robust farmwork to understand how CMS influence SCP through SCOP and CCGSCM mediation [5,36,37,38,39,40].

3.2. Conflict Management Strategies (CMS) in Supply Chains

Conflict management strategies (CMS) strategically address and resolve disputes within supply chains to enhance operational efficiency, stability, and stakeholder relationships [41,42]. Within the Jordanian food manufacturing sector, characterized by geopolitical complexity, resource scarcity, stringent regulations, and market volatility, effective CMS are critical [43,44]. They support sustainable supply chain practices, optimize resource allocation, and ensure food security, directly aligning with national priorities and broader sustainability objectives. This study will examine specific five strategies.
(1)
Collaboration
Collaboration in Jordan’s food manufacturing is essential due to resource scarcity and geopolitical influences [45]. It involves joint resource and knowledge sharing to enhance resource utilization and supply stability [46,47], building supply chain resilience through improved demand forecasting and production coordination [48].
(2)
Accommodation
Accommodation is vital in Jordan’s food sector for navigating relationships with diverse stakeholders, including governmental bodies and suppliers [49,50]. It involves prioritizing others’ concerns to maintain relational harmony, especially when dealing with regulatory compliance [51] and supplier needs [52], ensuring operational stability.
(3)
Avoidance
Avoidance is crucial in Jordan’s food sector for navigating socio-political and economic conflicts, buffering the supply chain from potential disruptions [14,53]. This strategy allows businesses to focus on operational efficiency by disengaging from non-essential conflicts that could destabilize the supply chain [41,54].
(4)
Compromise
Compromise is essential in Jordan’s food sector due to the need to balance the interests of diverse stakeholders, such as farmers and producers [55]. It involves mutual concessions to reach acceptable solutions on issues like pricing and volumes vital [56,57], safeguarding relationships and maintaining operational flow.
(5)
Competition
Competition in Jordan’s food manufacturing sector can manifest in price negotiations and delivery prioritization [14,58] While it can drive efficiency, it can also cause conflicts when interests clash or resources are [59]. Understanding its impact on stakeholder relationships is crucial for mitigating potential disruptions.

CMS in the Context of Jordan’s Food Manufacturing Sector

In Jordan’s food sector, conflict management strategies (CMS) are vital for navigating supply chain challenges arising from geopolitical, economic, and socio-cultural factors [60]. Applying collaboration, accommodation, avoidance, compromise, and competition strategies is crucial for managing conflicts among stakeholders over pricing, quality, and delivery [61]. Collaboration using smart technologies like blockchain supports Jordan’s smart city initiatives and sustainability goals (SDG 11 & 12). Jordan’s unique socio-economic and geopolitical context, including resource scarcity and regional instability, intensifies the need for effective CMS [39,62].
Table 1’s summary of the literature review on conflict management strategies outlines various conflict management strategies (CMS). For each strategy (such as collaboration, accommodation, avoidance, compromise, and competition), it provides a general description, discusses its importance in the context of supply chains, and highlights its specific relevance and application within Jordan’s food manufacturing sector. The table also includes an introduction to CMS and a dedicated section on CMS within Jordan’s food sector, with all information supported by academic citations.

3.3. Comparative Discussion: CMS in Developed vs. Emerging Economies

To contextualize the comparative analysis, it is pertinent to briefly outline the economic and demographic landscapes of the countries under consideration. Jordan, an emerging market, has a population of approximately 11.4 million and a GDP of around $51 billion (2023 est.), characterized by unique socio-economic and geopolitical complexities. By contrast, the UAE, a highly developed economy, boasts a smaller population of roughly 9.5 million but a significantly larger GDP of approximately $515 billion (2023 est.), indicative of its advanced infrastructure and diversified economy. Similarly, Singapore, a highly regulated and technologically advanced market, has a population of about 5.9 million and a substantial GDP of around $501 billion (2023 est.), reflecting its role as a global trade hub. Understanding these fundamental economic and demographic distinctions provides a critical backdrop for analyzing the varying applications and outcomes of CMS strategies across these diverse supply chain environments [69].
Jordan’s food manufacturing relies heavily on relationship-based CMS, emphasizing trust and informal negotiations [4,5,70], contrasting with developed markets that prioritize technology-driven solutions and formal agreements [41,71,72]. This distinction is crucial for understanding SCP in Jordan, where socio-economic and geopolitical complexities necessitate collaborative strategies. The study highlights that while collaborative CMS strategies enhance SCP through improved efficiency and stakeholder satisfaction, the reliance on personal connections in Jordan presents unique challenges compared to the data-driven approaches of developed economies. This reinforces the study’s conclusion that adaptive, collaborative, and customer-centric green practices are vital but must be tailored to Jordan’s specific context, recognizing the limitations of solely relationship-focused methods and the potential for integrating appropriate technological advancements (see Table 2 and Table 3).
Table 2 provides a comparative overview of how different conflict management strategies (CMS), such as collaboration, avoidance, competition, compromise, and accommodation, are applied in three distinct global contexts: Jordan, characterized as an emerging market; the UAE, noted for its advanced SCM technology; and Singapore, with its regulated SCM environment. The table illustrates the typical manifestation of each strategy within these varied settings.
Table 3 details the comparative outcomes of various conflict management strategies (CMS)—including collaboration, avoidance, and competition—across Jordan, the UAE, and Singapore. For each strategy, the table outlines the typical results and consequences observed in these different markets, emphasizing their impact on supply chain performance and dynamics within each specific region.

3.4. Supply Chain Operational Processes (SCOP)

Supply chain operational processes (SCOP) are critical to the food manufacturing sector, ensuring efficient production, storage, and delivery, given product perishability and stringent quality standards [73]. Globally, SCOP encompass production planning, inventory management, and distribution, all essential for a seamless supply chain [74,75,76]. These processes, impacted by technology, regulations, and market dynamics, directly influence supply chain operations [77]. This study explores how SCOP mediate the relationship between conflict management strategies and supply chain performance, examining how effective production planning and inventory management, for example, mitigate conflicts and ensure operational efficiency.
-
Production Planning
Production planning, crucial for efficient food manufacturing, involves determining product volume and timing based on demand, resources, and capacity [78]. In Jordan, this planning is vital for navigating fluctuating demand and resource limitations [79]. Effective planning optimizes resource use, reduces waste, and addresses supply chain conflicts, with resource constraints [80]. Jordan’s production planning is influenced by raw material availability and technological advancements, such as Industry 4.0 [81,82]. This study examines how production planning, as a SCOP dimension, impacts the relationship between conflict management and supply chain performance, specifically how it mitigates conflicts and optimizes performance in Jordan’s food sector.
-
Inventory Management
Inventory management, crucial for balancing inventory costs and demand, is especially complex in Jordan’s perishable food sector [83,84]. Effective inventory management, using techniques like JIT and EOQ, mitigates stakeholder disputes and controls costs [85]. However, Jordan faces unique challenges due to product perishability, demand fluctuations, and regional instability [29]. Aligning inventory control with conflict resolution is vital for Jordanian firms, and analyzing local case studies reveals how inventory management enhances supply chain efficiency and reduces conflicts [61].
-
Distribution
Distribution, a key SCOP element, ensures timely and accurate delivery of finished products, crucial in Jordan’s food sector for maintaining product freshness and customer satisfaction [86,87]. Strategic distribution alignment with conflict management can mitigate stakeholder disputes by ensuring reliable and cost-effective delivery.
-
Logistics
Logistics, another vital SCOP component, manages the movement and storage of goods throughout the supply chain. In Jordan, logistics is essential for navigating geopolitical and market challenges [27]. Effective logistics, including transportation and warehousing, minimizes costs and ensures timely delivery, directly impacting supply chain performance. Integrating logistics with conflict management ensures reliability and efficiency for all stakeholders [37].
-
The Mediating Role of SCOP in CMS → SCP Relationship
Supply chain operational processes (SCOP) act as a crucial link between conflict management strategies (CMS) and supply chain performance (SCP), translating conflict resolution into operational efficiency. However, the exact interplay between SCOP and CMS remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by analyzing how four SCOP dimensions—production planning, inventory management, distribution, and logistics—interact with CMS.
Table 4 details various components of supply chain operational processes (SCOP), such as production planning, inventory management, distribution, and logistics, and clarifies their role in conflict resolution. For each SCOP component, the table explains how it mediates the relationship between conflict management strategies (CMS) and supply chain performance (SCP), and it provides specific examples (with citations) illustrating how different CMS strategies influence these operational areas.
Jordan’s food manufacturing sector faces unique logistical, regulatory, and geopolitical constraints that impact SCOP effectiveness as a mediator between CMS and SCP. Complex customs regulations and import dependencies, coupled with a lack of standardized SCM regulations, create regulatory barriers [92]. Geopolitical constraints, such as landlocked geography and regional conflicts, disrupt supply chain routes and increase costs [92,93]. Furthermore, technology limitations like the limited adoption of AI and blockchain and a lack of integrated supply chain data impede SCOP efficiency [5,94]. These constraints necessitate resilience-focused CMS strategies, refining SCOP as a structured mediator and providing a practical framework for optimizing SCM decisions in conflict-prone supply chains.
-
SCOP within Jordan’s Socio-Economic Context
Supply chain operational processes (SCOP) in Jordan’s food manufacturing sector are significantly shaped by its complex socio-economic context, including geopolitical instability, resource scarcity, and economic fluctuations [82]. This sector requires resilient SCOP to navigate stringent regulations and market dynamics [60,95]. Integrating conflict management strategies is crucial for mitigating disruptions in logistics, distribution, production planning, and inventory management to meet fluctuating demands and stakeholder expectations [39,41]. Jordan’s economic stability, influenced by external factors, directly impacts resource availability and market demand, necessitating adaptive SCOP for sustainable supply chain performance [96,97].
Table 5 presents a literature review summary of supply chain operational processes (SCOP). For each key process—including an overview, production planning, inventory management, distribution, and logistics—the table provides a general description and highlights key points. It also specifically addresses SCOP within Jordan’s context, with all entries supported by academic citations.

3.5. Customer-Centric Green Supply Chain Management (CCGSCM) as a Strategic Sustainability Mediator

Customer-centric green supply chain management (GSCM) contributes to the smart business concept by integrating sustainable practices with a focus on customer needs, enhancing resource efficiency, reducing environmental impact, and promoting circular economy principles, as evidenced by recent research [99]. In the current business landscape, smart business practices face a fundamental shift toward focusing on customer satisfaction while integrating environmental sustainability [100]. The primary objective of CCGSCM is not only to increase the efficiency and sustainability of supply chain practices but also to consider customers’ expectations. This aspect is relevant and preferred in today’s environmentally conscious market [101].
Previous studies have highlighted that aligning green supply chain management (GSCM) practices with customer expectations can significantly improve operational efficiency while simultaneously enhancing customer satisfaction [102,103]. This dual focus on efficiency and satisfaction positions CCGSCM as a critical strategy for businesses aiming to thrive in the modern marketplace.
This approach aligns supply chain practices with customer expectations for sustainability, especially in the post-COVID-19 era. The pandemic has further amplified the relevance and popularity of CCGSCM, changing consumers’ expectations, making them more proactive in seeking sustainable practices and expecting organizations to engage in and incorporate social responsibility and sustainable practices [104]. This shift has developed unique opportunities for businesses to re-evaluate and enhance their strategies regarding GSCM. By emphasizing a customer-centric approach and prioritizing environmental sustainability, businesses can better meet the evolving demands of the market [105].

3.6. Supply Chain Performance (SCP) Outcomes

3.6.1. Introduction to SCP Metrics and Importance

Supply chain performance (SCP) measures a supply chain’s efficiency and effectiveness in meeting objectives, assessed through metrics like cost management, quality, and responsiveness [28,106]. In food manufacturing, SCP is vital due to product perishability and stringent standards [107]. Efficient SCP enhances competitive advantage and customer satisfaction by ensuring timely delivery and quality [89]. In Jordan’s food sector, SCP is complex due to geopolitical and socio-economic challenges, requiring resilience and adaptability to global market dynamics [79].

3.6.2. Detailed Exploration of Each Measure of SCP

(1)
Cost of Supply Chain
Cost management is a critical dimension of supply chain performance (SCP) in food manufacturing, impacting profitability and competitiveness [108]. It encompasses production, logistics, inventory, and waste costs, requiring strategic planning due to product perishability and stringent regulations [74,109]. In Jordan, cost management is influenced by political instability, resource scarcity, and global commodity prices, notably water scarcity and transportation costs [110,111]. Strategies like Just-In-Time (JIT) inventory and technologies like IoT and blockchain can optimize costs [85,112]. Understanding cost structures in Jordan’s food sector is vital for enhancing efficiency and profitability, especially when evaluating the impact of conflict management strategies on SCP.
(2)
Quality of Supply Chain
Quality is critical in food manufacturing SCP, encompassing safety, consistency, and standards compliance [113]. It extends beyond product excellence to include process and relationship management, with practices like HACCP and GMP as essential [98,114]. Jordan’s food sector faces challenges adhering to standards like ISO 22000 while navigating geopolitical and resource constraints [115,116]. Quality management involves supplier relationships, where collaborative conflict management strategies can enhance input quality [117]. This study explores how conflict management strategies impact quality practices in Jordan’s food SCP, enhancing its competitive position.
(3)
Responsiveness in Supply Chain
Responsiveness in SCP refers to the supply chain’s ability to promptly address market demands, which is critical in the perishable food sector [27]. In Jordan, regional tensions and resource limitations impact responsiveness [118]. Conflict management strategies (CMS) significantly influence this. Collaborative CMS strategies enhance responsiveness through improved communication and decision making [14]. Conversely, avoidance strategies can hinder it. Understanding how CMS affect responsiveness in Jordan’s food sector is crucial for mitigating conflict-driven disruptions and meeting market demands [115].
(4)
Flexibility in Supply Chain
Flexibility in SCP refers to the supply chain’s ability to adapt to variations and disruptions [38]. In food manufacturing, this is crucial due to volatile demand and regulatory standards. In Jordan, geopolitical factors and diverse market demands necessitate flexibility flexibility [119]. Conflict management strategies (CMS) enhance flexibility by preventing conflicts from disrupting operations [14]. For example, compromise can facilitate adaptability. This study explores how CMS impact flexibility in Jordan’s food sector, demonstrating how effective conflict management safeguards adaptability.
(5)
SCP in Jordan’s Food Manufacturing Industry
Supply chain performance (SCP) is vital for Jordan’s food manufacturing sector, impacting economic stability and food security [13]. This industry, a GDP contributor, faces conflicts affecting performance due to its reliance on imported materials and diverse stakeholders [53,120]. Conflict management strategies (CMS) are crucial for navigating these conflicts, which impact costs, quality, responsiveness, and flexibility. This study examines how effective CMS enhance SCP in Jordan’s food sector, providing practical insights for industry practitioners.
To further elaborate on the multi-faceted nature of supply chain performance, Table 6 provides a comprehensive summary of key SCP metrics and their relevance within the food manufacturing industry, transitioning from general international relevance to specific manifestations and challenges within Jordanian context.
Table 6 presents a literature review summary focused on supply chain performance (SCP). It details various facets of SCP, including an introduction to its metrics and importance, as well as specific dimensions like cost, quality, responsiveness, and flexibility. For each section, the table provides a concise summary of its key aspects and relevance, with a dedicated focus on SCP within Jordan’s food manufacturing industry, all supported by academic references.

3.7. Tactical Pillars for Constructing Green Supply Chain Resilience in Food Manufacturing

(1)
Relationship Characteristics—Power Dynamics
Power dynamics, characterized by the asymmetrical distribution of influence, significantly impact supply chain operations and conflict management within Jordan’s food manufacturing sector [121]. These dynamics, encompassing various power types like coercion and reward, influence conflict resolution strategies, with dominant players often enforcing their preferred approaches while smaller entities adopt conciliatory tactics [90,122,123]. Furthermore, power influences supply chain operational processes (SCOP) and supply chain performance (SCP) by shaping production strategies, inventory management, and overall efficiency, with dominant firms dictating terms that affect costs, quality, and responsiveness [36,122]. In Jordan, where the food sector is crucial to the economy, power dynamics are shaped by market dominance, resource accessibility, and global presence, leading to significant influence by larger corporations over smaller suppliers and distributors, thus affecting both conflict resolution and operational strategies [124].
(2)
Long-Term Relationships and Conflict Intensity
Stakeholder relations in supply chains are significantly influenced by maintained affiliations and conflict intensity. Long-term relationships, characterized by cooperation and shared goals, foster trust and mitigate conflicts, encouraging collaborative and compromise-based conflict management strategies [67,125]. Conversely, conflict intensity dictates the choice of conflict management, with high-intensity disputes requiring robust strategies like collaboration or competition, while low-intensity conflicts may be addressed through avoidance or accommodation [13,124]. In Jordan’s food manufacturing sector, long-term relationships are crucial for stability, yet conflicts over pricing, delivery, and quality pose challenges. The Jordanian cultural preference for relationship preservation often leads to the adoption of compromise and accommodation to resolve disputes and maintain harmony [126,127].
Table 7 summarizes the literature review on key moderating variables relevant to supply chain dynamics. It is structured into two main sections: ‘Relationship Characteristics—Power Dynamics’ and ‘Conflict Characteristics—Long-term Relationship and Conflict Intensity.’ Within these sections, various subsections provide detailed descriptions of each variable, discuss their relevance in conflict management and for supply chain operations and performance, and specifically examine their role within Jordan’s food manufacturing sector, all supported by academic citations.

3.8. Accounting for Contextual Influences: The Role of Control Variables

To accurately assess the impact of CMS on SCP in Jordan’s food manufacturing sector, this study controlled for company size, industry segment, and location. Company size influences resource availability and CMS structure, with larger firms adopting structured strategies and smaller ones relying on agile approaches [128,129]. The industry segment shapes operational practices and regulatory requirements, necessitating tailored CMS for challenges like perishable goods and market fluctuations [84,95]. Location impacts logistics and stakeholder interactions, requiring customized CMS like collaboration or compromise to mitigate location-specific risks [41,130]. These controls ensure the study’s robustness, isolating the direct relationship between CMS and SCP, and providing relevant strategic insights for diverse organizational contexts within Jordan.

4. Discussion

This systematic review synthesizes the relationships among conflict management strategies (CMS), supply chain operational processes (SCOP), customer-centric green supply chain management (CCGSCM), and supply chain performance (SCP) within Jordan’s food manufacturing sector. Moving beyond a mere enumeration of findings, this discussion critically analyzes why these relationships manifest, how they contribute to theoretical advancements, and what implications they hold for practice and policy [18,24].
A key finding is that CMS significantly enhance SCP, primarily through SCOP as a mediator, aligning with previous studies across various industries [41,131]. Notably, collaboration emerges as the most effective CMS dimension, significantly fostering stakeholder interactions, operational coordination, and resource efficiency, which is crucial in Jordan’s context characterized by resource scarcity and geopolitical instability [46,64].
The dominance of collaboration in this context can be attributed to its emphasis on building trust and shared understanding, which are pivotal in mitigating the impact of external complexities. Conversely, competitive and avoidance strategies, while potentially beneficial in specific short-term scenarios, often prove to be detrimental when persistent conflicts or responsiveness are required. This suggests that their limited application in the Jordanian food manufacturing sector is an adaptive response to its unique operational and cultural landscape. While collaborative strategies are often favored for their long-term benefits in fostering trust and shared goals, competitive and avoidance strategies exhibit mixed impacts—potentially beneficial in specific short-term scenarios but detrimental when persistent conflicts or responsiveness are required [13,14].
The analysis underscores the relevance of other CMS dimensions, such as accommodation, in sectors with pronounced power asymmetries. Accommodation effectively manages stakeholder relationships, maintains stability, and minimizes conflicts in Jordanian SMEs, where smaller enterprises frequently navigate pressures from dominant stakeholders, including government bodies and major retailers. This highlights a nuanced theoretical contribution to understanding power dynamics in SCM, demonstrating how accommodating approaches preserve relational harmony in contexts where power imbalances exist [49,121].
A key contribution of this review lies in the detailed exploration of SCOP and CCGSCM as a critical mediator. These processes significantly mediate the impact of CMS on SCP. Logistics and inventory management, for instance, are vital for mitigating disruptions due to external challenges, as effective CMS can streamline these operations [27,29,83]. Furthermore, CCGSCM emerged as essential in aligning supply chain practices with evolving customer preferences for sustainability and responsibility, notably amplified post-COVID-19 [99,101]. The increasing emphasis on sustainability and customer centricity in supply chains drives companies to adopt greener practices and enhance their responsiveness to customer needs [132,133]. This mediation highlights a crucial theoretical link between conflict resolution, operational efficiency, and sustainable practices, moving beyond traditional linear models of SCM performance [108]. The integration of technology such as blockchain can further enhance the mediating role of CCGSCM by improving transparency, traceability, and information sharing within the supply chain [86,112].
The comparative analysis between Jordan and developed markets (e.g., UAE, Singapore) identifies disparities in technology adoption, regulatory structures, and CMS formalization. In developed economies, technology-driven, structured conflict resolution mechanisms contrast sharply with Jordan’s informal, relationship-driven practices [41,71,72]. Understanding these differences provides nuanced insights for policymakers and industry leaders, emphasizing the strategic integration of CMS with technology and regulation tailored to Jordan’s specific needs and cultural practices [4,5]. This comparative lens elucidates how contextual factors shape the applicability and effectiveness of various CMS, thereby enriching the theoretical understanding of SCM in diverse global contexts [5,39].

4.1. Linking Conflict Management to Smart and Green Cities and SDGs

Integrating conflict management strategies (CMS) with smart city and green city principles offers significant potential to advance urban sustainability (SDG 11) by enabling efficient resource use, transparency, and collaborative problem solving (SDG 17). In Jordan’s food manufacturing sector, technologies such as blockchain-driven supply chain platforms enhance transparency and operational efficiency, significantly reducing waste and ensuring responsible production (SDG 12). Table 8 explicitly contains a new column linking CMS strategies to relevant SDGs and smart city relevance.
Table 8 summarizes the connections between various conflict management strategies (CMS)—namely collaboration, accommodation, avoidance, compromise, and competition—and their relevance to smart city initiatives, as well as identifying the pertinent sustainable development goals (SDGs) associated with each strategy. For every CMS strategy listed, the table outlines its specific application or implication within a smart city context and lists the corresponding SDGs it supports.

4.2. Theoretical and Practical Implications

This systematic review offers several significant theoretical and practical implications, directly addressing the “so what” query.
Theoretically, this study contributes by integrating diverse theoretical lenses (stakeholder theory [15], conflict management theory [134], social exchange theory [31], resource dependence theory [26], and game theory [32]) into a comprehensive analytical framework. This framework provides significant insights and advancements in understanding complex SCM dynamics, particularly in emerging markets, by moving beyond fragmented analyses to offer a holistic view of conflict resolution’s impact on performance [42,130]. Our synthesis illuminates the intricate interplay between CMS, SCOP, and CCGSCM, providing a robust foundation for future theory building in this underexplored area. We emphasize that CMS is not a monolithic concept but a dynamic interplay shaped by context and mediated by operational and green practices.
Practically, this study offers vital guidance to policymakers and industry leaders in Jordan’s food manufacturing sector and beyond. It highlights the strategic importance of adaptive, collaborative, and customer-centric green practices in supply chain management [99,101]. Managers should prioritize building strong relationships with supply chain partners [125,126], fostering open communication and information sharing [86,135], and judiciously investing in technologies that can improve transparency and traceability [112]. Policymakers can foster a supportive environment by promoting collaboration among stakeholders, incentivizing green initiatives, and investing in infrastructure development to enhance food security and economic growth [92,95].

4.3. Limitations and Future Research

While this study provides robust findings, it acknowledges limitations such as the exclusion of non-English studies and its concentrated focus on Jordan, which may limit immediate generalizability. Future research is recommended to include longitudinal empirical studies [77] to validate the proposed framework and explore the evolution of conflict management practices. Further cross-cultural analyses [95,127], extending beyond the current comparative scope (e.g., to European and North American contexts), are encouraged to generalize these insights more broadly. Additionally, exploring the impact of other contextual factors, such as specific government regulations [92] or broader technological advancements [82,94], on CMS and SCP would provide valuable insights. The exploration of additional moderating variables, such as power dynamics and long-term relationships, could further enrich the understanding of SCM dynamics.

5. Conclusions

This systematic review addresses critical research gaps concerning the interplay between conflict management strategies and supply chain performance in Jordan’s food manufacturing sector. Collaborative CMS strategies significantly enhance SCP by improving efficiency, resilience, and stakeholder satisfaction, which are essential in navigating Jordan’s socio-economic and geopolitical complexities. The mediating role of supply chain operational processes and customer-centric green supply chain management is crucial in transforming conflict management outcomes into practical performance enhancements. This study offers valuable theoretical and practical insights tailored specifically to emerging markets like Jordan, underscoring the necessity for adaptive and context-sensitive approaches to supply chain conflict management.
Theoretically, integrating stakeholder theory, conflict management theory, social exchange theory, resource dependence theory, and game theory into a comprehensive analytical framework provides significant insights and advancements in understanding SCM dynamics. Practically, this study offers vital guidance to policymakers and industry leaders, highlighting the strategic importance of adaptive, collaborative, and customer-centric green practices in supply chain management.
While the study provides robust findings, it acknowledges limitations such as the exclusion of non-English studies and its concentrated focus on Jordan. Future research is recommended to include longitudinal studies, further cross-cultural analyses, and the exploration of additional moderating variables, such as power dynamics and long-term relationships, to generalize these insights more broadly.

Author Contributions

Writing—review & editing, A.A.; Supervision, M.Y.; Resources, R.A.; conceptualization, J.P.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Usuga Cadavid, J.P.; Lamouri, S.; Grabot, B.; Pellerin, R.; Fortin, A. Machine learning applied in production planning and control: A state-of-the-art in the era of industry 4.0. J. Intell. Manuf. 2020, 31, 1531–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Oluyisola, O.E.; Bhalla, S.; Sgarbossa, F.; Strandhagen, J.O. Designing and developing smart production planning and control systems in the industry 4.0 era: A methodology and case study. J. Intell. Manuf. 2022, 33, 311–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rossit, D.A.; Tohmé, F.; Frutos, M. Industry 4.0: Smart scheduling. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 3802–3813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shaer, S.; O’ Neil, A.; Salem, F.; Akrout, Z.; Shibl, E. Advancing Artificial Intelligence Impact in Dubai: Future Directors Towards Strengthening the Digital Economy (March 9, 2023). Future of Government Series, 2023. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4688560 (accessed on 1 October 2024).
  5. Almasri, A.; Ying, M. Adopting Circular Economy Principles: How Do Conflict Management Strategies Help Adopt Smart Technology in Jordanian SMEs? Sustainability 2024, 16, 9475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bondigas, A. The Importance of Project Planning in Industrial Settings. Chron. 2022. Available online: https://smallbusiness.chron.com/organizational-project-management-skills-78288.html (accessed on 1 October 2024).
  7. IMCO Software. The Importance of Long-Term Planning in Manufacturing. Imcosoftware. Available online: https://www.imcosoftware.com/the-importance-of-long-term-planning-in-manufacturing/ (accessed on 1 October 2024).
  8. World Bank. Jordan: US$85 Million for a New Industry Development Fund to Promote Investments and Exports. World Bank. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2022/05/16/jordan-us-85-million-for-a-new-industry-development-fund-to-promote-investments-and-exports (accessed on 1 October 2024).
  9. Dubey, R.; Gunasekaran, A.; Bryde, D.J.; Dwivedi, Y.K.; Papadopoulos, T. Blockchain technology for enhancing swift-trust, collaboration and resilience within a humanitarian supply chain setting. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 3381–3398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Durach, C.F.; Glasen, P.C.; Straube, F. Disruption causes and disruption management in supply chains with Chinese suppliers: Managing cultural differences. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2017, 47, 843–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ivanov, D. Lean resilience: AURA (Active Usage of Resilience Assets) framework for post-COVID-19 supply chain management. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2022, 33, 1196–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Al-Dmour, H.; Al Hasan, R.; Thneibat, M.; Masa’deh, R.E.; Alkhadra, W.; Al-Dmour, R.; Alalwan, A. Integrated model for the factors determining the academic’s remote working productivity and engagement: Empirical study. Sage Open 2023, 13, 21582440231194393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jum’a, L. The role of blockchain-enabled supply chain applications in improving supply chain performance: The case of Jordanian manufacturing sector. Manag. Res. Rev. 2023, 46, 1315–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rahim, M.A. Managing Conflict in Organizations; Routledge: London, UK, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  15. Freeman, R.E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  16. Rahim, M.A.; Buntzman, G.F. Supervisory power bases, styles of handling conflict with subordinates, and subordinate compliance and satisfaction. J. Psychol. 1989, 123, 195–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Aloun, D.M. International Trade Standards in Jordanian Legislation. Afr. J. Biol. Sci. 2024, 6, 6887–6900. [Google Scholar]
  18. Snyder, H. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 104, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Whittemore, R.; Knafl, K. The integrative review: Updated methodology. J. Adv. Nurs. 2005, 52, 546–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3, 77–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Munn, Z.; Barker, T.H.; Moola, S.; Tufanaru, C.; Stern, C.; McArthur, A.; Stephenson, M.; Aromataris, E. Methodological quality of case series studies: An introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI Evid. Synth. 2020, 18, 2127–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Demirel, S.; Kapuscinski, R.; Yu, M. Strategic behavior of suppliers in the face of production disruptions. Manag. Sci. 2018, 64, 533–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Denyer, D.; Tranfield, D. Producing a Systematic Review; Sage Publications: Newbury, CA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hunter, J.E.; Schmidt, F.L. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  25. McGahan, A.M. Integrating insights from the resource-based view of the firm into the new stakeholder theory. J. Manag. 2021, 47, 1734–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pfeffer, J.; Salancik, G.R. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective; Stanford University Press: Redwood City, CA, USA, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gligor, D.M.; Holcomb, M.C. Understanding the role of logistics capabilities in achieving supply chain agility: A systematic literature review. Supply Chain. Manag. Int. J. 2012, 17, 438–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ka, J.M.R.; Ab, N.R.; Lb, K. A review on supply chain performance measurement systems. Procedia Manuf. 2019, 30, 40–47. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hiassat, A.; Diabat, A.; Rahwan, I. A genetic algorithm approach for location-inventory-routing problem with perishable products. J. Manuf. Syst. 2017, 42, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Blau, P.M. Social exchange. Int. Encycl. Soc. Sci. 1968, 7, 452–457. [Google Scholar]
  31. Emerson, R.M. Rational Choice and Social Exchange: A Critique of Exchange Theory. Am. J. Sociol. 1977, 82, 1364–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Weintraub, E.R. Toward a History of Game Theory; Duke University Press: Durham, NC, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  33. Coser, L.A. Sociological theory from the Chicago dominance to 1965. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 1976, 2, 145–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Güçlü, İ. Karl Marx and Ralf Dahrendorf: A comparative perspective on class formation and conflict. Eskişehir Osman. Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilim. Dergisi 2014, 9, 151–168. [Google Scholar]
  35. Marx, K.; Engels, F. The Communist Manifesto; International Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 1848; p. 1363. [Google Scholar]
  36. Chamanara, S.; Goldstein, B.P.; Newell, J.P. Power asymmetries in supply chains and implications for environmental governance: A study of the beef industry. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2023, 28, 923–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kim, S.T.; Lee, H.-H.; Hwang, T. Logistics integration in the supply chain: A resource dependence theory perspective. Int. J. Qual. Innov. 2020, 6, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Piprani, A.Z.; Jaafar, N.I.; Ali, S.M.; Mubarik, M.S.; Shahbaz, M. Multi-dimensional supply chain flexibility and supply chain resilience: The role of supply chain risks exposure. Oper. Manag. Res. 2022, 15, 307–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shareef, M.A.; Dwivedi, Y.; Ahmed, J.U.; Kumar, U.; Mahmud, R. Stakeholders conflict and private–Public partnership chain (PPPC): Supply chain of perishable product. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2022, 33, 1218–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, A.; Su, M.; Sun, S.; Zhao, Y. A model of BIM application capability evaluation for Chinese construction enterprises based on interval grey clustering analysis. J. ASIAN Archit. Build. Eng. 2021, 20, 210–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Huo, B.; He, H.; Tian, M. Conflict management strategies and their relationships with exchange performance in supply chains. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2023, 53, 1217–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Durugbo, C.M.; Al-Balushi, Z. Supply chain management in times of crisis: A systematic review. Manag. Rev. Q. 2023, 73, 1179–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Alshawabkeh, R.; AL-Awamleh, H.; Alkhawaldeh, M.; Kanaan, R.; Al-Hawary, S.; Mohammad, A.; Alkhawalda, R. The mediating role of supply chain management on the relationship between big data and supply chain performance using SCOR model. Uncertain Supply Chain. Manag. 2022, 10, 729–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Saleheen, F.; Habib, M.M. Global supply chain disruption management post COVID 19. Am. J. Ind. Bus. Manag. 2022, 12, 376–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Alsaad, A.K.; Yousif, K.J.; AlJedaiah, M.N. Collaboration: The key to gain value from IT in supply chain. EuroMed J. Bus. 2018, 13, 214–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sanjaya, D.B.; Suartama, I.K.; Suastika, I.N. The Effect of the Conflict Resolution Learning Model and Portfolio Assessment on the Students’ Learning Outcomes of Civic Education. Int. J. Instr. 2022, 15, 473–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Baah, C.; Opoku Agyeman, D.; Acquah, I.S.K.; Agyabeng-Mensah, Y.; Afum, E.; Issau, K.; Ofori, D.; Faibil, D. Effect of information sharing in supply chains: Understanding the roles of supply chain visibility, agility, collaboration on supply chain performance. Benchmarking Int. J. 2022, 29, 434–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cao, M.; Zhang, Q. Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. J. Oper. Manag. 2011, 29, 163–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Diab, A.L.; Pabbajah, M.; Nurina Widyanti, R.; Muthalib, L.M.; Fajar Widyatmoko, W. Accommodation of local wisdom in conflict resolution of Indonesia’s urban society. Cogent Soc. Sci. 2022, 8, 2153413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Martins, M.M.; Trindade, L.d.L.; Vandresen, L.; Amestoy, S.C.; Prata, A.P.; Vilela, C. Conflict management strategies used by Portuguese nurse managers. Rev. Bras. Enferm. 2020, 73, e20190336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Obeidat, B. Assessing agritourism potential in a Jordanian village based on farmer-specific and location-based factors. Cogent Eng. 2022, 9, 2119531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Obeidat, B.; Hamadneh, A. Agritourism-A Sustainable Approach to the Development of Rural Settlements in Jordan: Al-Baqura Village as a Case Study. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan. 2022, 17, 669–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Abdallah, A.B.; Obeidat, B.Y.; Aqqad, N.O. The impact of supply chain management practices on supply chain performance in Jordan: The moderating effect of competitive intensity. Int. Bus. Res. 2014, 7, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Min, J.; Iqbal, S.; Khan, M.A.S.; Akhtar, S.; Anwar, F.; Qalati, S.A. Impact of supervisory behavior on sustainable employee performance: Mediation of conflict management strategies using PLS-SEM. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0236650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Macieira, A.; Barbosa, J.; Teixeira, P. Food safety in local farming of fruits and vegetables. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 9733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Noermijati, N.; Sunaryo, S.; Ratri, I.K. The influence of emotional intelligence on employee performance mediated by cooperative conflict management style of integrating and compromising. J. Apl. Manaj. 2019, 17, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Behfar, K.J.; Peterson, R.S.; Mannix, E.A.; Trochim, W.M. The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: A close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes. J. Appl. Psychol. 2008, 93, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Boz Semerci, A. Examination of knowledge hiding with conflict, competition and personal values. Int. J. Confl. Manag. 2019, 30, 111–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chen, C.; Xu, C. A negotiation optimization strategy of collaborative procurement with supply chain based on multi-agent system. Math. Probl. Eng. 2018, 2018, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hundaileh, L.; Fayad, F. Jordan’s Food Processing Sector Analysis and Strategy for Sectoral Improvement. Giz Jordan. 2019. Available online: https://www.giz.de/en/downloads/Jordan%20Food%20Processing%20Sector%20Analysis%20and%20Strategy%20for%20Sectoral%20Improvement.pdf (accessed on 2 October 2024).
  61. Al-Hamdan, Z.; Adnan Al-Ta’amneh, I.; Rayan, A.; Bawadi, H. The impact of emotional intelligence on conflict management styles used by Jordanian nurse managers. J. Nurs. Manag. 2019, 27, 560–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, T.; Wu, J.; Gu, J.; Hu, L. Impact of open innovation on organizational performance in different conflict management styles: Based on resource dependence theory. Int. J. Confl. Manag. 2021, 32, 199–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Murad, M.A.; Abdullah, A.-K.; Abdulrahman, A.-K. Crisis management strategies in Jordanian hotel industry. J. Environ. Manag. Tour. 2021, 12, 578–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Delak, B.; Širok, K. Physician–nurse conflict resolution styles in primary health care. Nurs. Open 2022, 9, 1077–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Cheek, T.; Hamrin, C.L. Introduction: Collaboration and Conflict in the Search for a New Order, in China’s Establishment Intellectuals; Routledge: London, UK, 2023; pp. 3–20. [Google Scholar]
  66. Maiti, S.; Choi, J.-H. Investigation and implementation of conflict management strategies to minimize conflicts in the construction industry. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 2021, 21, 337–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Obeidat, A.M. The impact of business intelligence in crisis management: The strategic vigilance as an intermediary variable in Jordanian insurance companies. Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst. 2022, 41, 342–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, Y.; Niu, B.; Guo, P.; Song, J.-S. Direct Sourcing or Agent Sourcing? Contract Negotiation in Procurement Outsourcing. M&SOM-Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2021, 23, 294–310. [Google Scholar]
  69. World Bank. World Bank Open Data; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  70. Mohsen, B.M. Ai-driven optimization of urban logistics in smart cities: Integrating autonomous vehicles and iot for efficient delivery systems. Sustainability 2024, 16, 11265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Irfan, M.; Wang, M. Data-driven capabilities, supply chain integration and competitive performance: Evidence from the food and beverages industry in Pakistan. Br. Food J. 2019, 121, 2708–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yin, W.; Seo, J.; Kwon, A. Building resilient global value chains in the pandemic era: A conceptual framework and case studies of Singapore and Vietnam. Compet. Nations 2022, 1, 131–162. [Google Scholar]
  73. Saragih, J.; Tarigan, A.; Silalahi, E.F.; Wardati, J.; Pratama, I. Supply chain operational capability and supply chain operational performance: Does the supply chain management and supply chain integration matters. Int. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2020, 9, 1222–1229. [Google Scholar]
  74. Aung, M.M.; Chang, Y.S. Traceability in a food supply chain: Safety and quality perspectives. Food Control. 2014, 39, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Gupta, S.; Jain, S.K. A literature review of lean manufacturing. Int. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. Manag. 2013, 8, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Krajewski, L.J.; Malhotra, M.K. Operations Management: Processes and Supply Chains; Pearson Education: London, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  77. Mollenkopf, D.A.; Ozanne, L.K.; Stolze, H.J. A transformative supply chain response to COVID-19. J. Serv. Manag. 2021, 32, 190–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Han, J.-H.; Lee, J.-Y.; Kim, Y.-D. Production planning in a two-level supply chain for production-time-dependent products with dynamic demands. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019, 135, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jum’a, L.; Zimon, D.; Ikram, M. A relationship between supply chain practices, environmental sustainability and financial performance: Evidence from manufacturing companies in Jordan. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Stadtler, H. Supply chain management: An overview. In Supply Chain Management and Advanced Planning: Concepts, Models, Software, and Case Studies; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 3–28. [Google Scholar]
  81. Jaber, J.O.; Marahleh, G.; Dalabeeh, A. Emissions reduction resulting from renewable energy projects in Jordan. J. Energy Technol. Policy 2019, 9, 42–51. [Google Scholar]
  82. Abu-Rumman, A.; AlSha’ar, H.; Alqhaiwi, L.A.; Al Shraah, A. Exploring the Challenges and Opportunities of Implementing Industry 4.0 in Jordan: Public Shareholding Manufacturing Companies Perspective. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2023, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Becerra, P.; Mula, J.; Sanchis, R. Green supply chain quantitative models for sustainable inventory management: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 328, 129544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Diab, S.M.; Al-Bourini, F.A.; Abu-Rumman, A.H. The impact of green supply chain management practices on organizational performance: A study of Jordanian food industries. J. Manag. Sustain. 2015, 5, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Pan, F.; Nagi, R. Robust supply chain design under uncertain demand in agile manufacturing. Comput. Oper. Res. 2010, 37, 668–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Dwivedi, S.K.; Amin, R.; Vollala, S. Blockchain based secured information sharing protocol in supply chain management system with key distribution mechanism. J. Inf. Secur. Appl. 2020, 54, 102554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Randrianarisoa, L.M.; Gillen, D. Reducing emissions in international transport: A supply chain perspective. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2022, 102, 103074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Nandi, S.; Sarkis, J.; Hervani, A.; Helms, M. Do blockchain and circular economy practices improve post COVID-19 supply chains? A resource-based and resource dependence perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems 2021, 121, 333–363. [Google Scholar]
  89. Christopher, M. Logistics and Supply Chain Management; Pearson Education: London, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  90. Reimann, F.; Ketchen, D.J., Jr. Power in supply chain management. J. Supply Chain. Manag. 2017, 53, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Prajogo, D.; Mena, C.; Cooper, B.; Teh, P.-L. The roles of national culture in affecting quality management practices and quality performance-multilevel and multi-country analysis. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2022, 42, 877–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. WorldBank. Jordan: Country Overview. 2021. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/jordan/overview (accessed on 2 October 2024).
  93. Haraguchi, M.; Lall, U. Flood risks and impacts: A case study of Thailand’s floods in 2011 and research questions for supply chain decision making. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2015, 14, 256–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Abaddi, S.; Al-Shboul, M.d.A. “Revealing the hidden”–challenges facing early digital entrepreneurs in Jordan. Manag. Sustain. Arab. Rev. 2023, 3, 69–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Christoforidou, M.; Borghuis, G.; Seijger, C.; van Halsema, G.E.; Hellegers, P. Food security under water scarcity: A comparative analysis of Egypt and Jordan. Food Secur. 2023, 15, 171–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Schuetze, B.; Hussein, H. The geopolitical economy of an undermined energy transition: The case of Jordan. Energy Policy 2023, 180, 113655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Qtaishat, T.; El-Habbab, M.S.; Bumblauskas, D.P.; Tabieh, M. The impact of drought on food security and sustainability in Jordan. GeoJournal 2023, 88, 1389–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Saragih, J.; Tarigan, A.; Pratama, I.; Wardati, J.; Silalahi, E.F. The impact of total quality management, supply chain management practices and operations capability on firm performance. Pol. J. Manag. Stud. 2020, 21, 384–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Chavez, R.; Yu, W.; Feng, M.; Wiengarten, F. The effect of customer-centric green supply chain management on operational performance and customer satisfaction. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2016, 25, 205–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Raoof, S. Developing a Customer-Centric Green Supply Chain Strategy in the Era of Big Data; Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya: Barcelona, Spain, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  101. Ye, Y.; Lau, K.H.; Teo, L. Alignment of green supply chain strategies and operations from a product perspective. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2023, 34, 1566–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Laari, S.; Töyli, J.; Solakivi, T.; Ojala, L. Firm performance and customer-driven green supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 1960–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Jena, S.K. Impact of customer-centric approach and customer dissatisfying cost on supply chain profit under price competition. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2023, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Villar, A.; Paladini, S.; Buckley, O. Towards Supply Chain 5.0: Redesigning Supply Chains as Resilient, Sustainable, and Human-Centric Systems in a Post-pandemic World. In Operations Research Forum; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  105. Kholaif, M.M.N.H.K.; Sarwar, B.; Xiao, M.; Poliak, M.; Giovando, G. Post-pandemic opportunities for F&B green supply chains and supply chain viability: The moderate effect of blockchains and big data analytics. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Gunasekaran, A.; Patel, C.; Tirtiroglu, E. Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2001, 21, 71–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Manzini, R.; Accorsi, R. The new conceptual framework for food supply chain assessment. J. Food Eng. 2013, 115, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Seuring, S.; Müller, M. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 2008, 16, 1699–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Kittipanya-Ngam, P.; Tan, K.H. A framework for food supply chain digitalization: Lessons from Thailand. Prod. Plan. Control. 2020, 31, 158–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Beithou, N.; Qandil, A.; Khalid, M.B.; Horvatinec, J.; Ondrasek, G. Review of Agricultural-Related Water Security in Water-Scarce Countries: Jordan Case Study. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Khan, K.; Su, C.-W.; Tao, R.; Umar, M. How do geopolitical risks affect oil prices and freight rates? Ocean Coast. Manag. 2021, 215, 105955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Kshetri, N. 1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2018, 39, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Pham, T.; Doan, T. Supply chain relationship quality, environmental uncertainty, supply chain performance and financial performance of high-tech agribusinesses in Vietnam. Uncertain Supply Chain. Manag. 2020, 8, 663–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Babeker, A.; Ahmed, A.; Ahmed, A.; Ebrahiem, M. Assessment of the extent implementing the Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs) and Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point System (HACCP) in Sudan sugar industry factories. J. Agric. Sci. Food Technol. 2021, 7, 368–373. [Google Scholar]
  115. Mazzawi, R.; Alawamleh, M. Managing quality within existing supply chains: Case studies from Jordan. Int. J. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2019, 32, 44–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Krampe, E. Syria, Palestine, and Jordan: Case Studies in Water Scarcity, Conflict, and Migration. Maneto Undergrad. Res. J. 2020, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Caputo, A. Religious motivation, nepotism and conflict management in Jordan. Int. J. Confl. Manag. 2018, 29, 146–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Jarrah, M. Total quality management and the role in developing supply chain management in Jordan companies. Uncertain Supply Chain. Manag. 2023, 11, 737–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Al-Hawary, S.I.S.; Mohammad, A.S.; Mohammad, A.A.S.; Alsarahni, A.H.H. Supply chain flexibility aspects and their impact on customers satisfaction of pharmaceutical industry in Jordan. Int. J. Bus. Perform. Supply Chain Model. 2017, 9, 326–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Abu Nimeh, H.; Abdallah, A.B.; Sweis, R. Lean supply chain management practices and performance: Empirical evidence from manufacturing companies. Int. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2018, 7, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  121. Sharma, V.; Raj, A.; Chakraborty, A. Analysis of power dynamics in sustainable supply chain under non-linear demand setup. Oper. Manag. Res. 2023, 16, 18–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Li, H.; Shao, J.; Zhu, S.X. Impacts of power dynamics and gray markets on supply chains. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 222, 107488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ghosh, R.; Eriksson, M. Food waste due to retail power in supply chains: Evidence from Sweden. Glob. Food Secur. 2019, 20, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Yoo, S.H.; Seo, Y.W. Effect of supply chain structure and power dynamics on R&D and market performances. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 2017, 18, 487–504. [Google Scholar]
  125. Al-Omoush, K.S.; Palacios-Marques, D.; Ulrich, K. The impact of intellectual capital on supply chain agility and collaborative knowledge creation in responding to unprecedented pandemic crises. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2022, 178, 121603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Zureiqat, G.; Ostermeier, M. The Impact of Trade and Investment Policies on Productive and Decent Work; Country Report for Jordan; International Labour Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022; Available online: https://www.ilo.org/publications/impact-trade-and-investment-policies-productive-and-decent-employment (accessed on 1 October 2024).
  127. Al-Hyari, K. The determinants of export performance of Jordanian SMEs: A comparative perspective. Int. J. Bus. Glob. 2023, 34, 174–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Dang, C.; Li, Z.F.; Yang, C. Measuring firm size in empirical corporate finance. J. Bank. Financ. 2018, 86, 159–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Andreoni, A.; Chang, H.-J. The political economy of industrial policy: Structural interdependencies, policy alignment and conflict management. Struct. Change Econ. Dyn. 2019, 48, 136–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Shishodia, A.; Sharma, R.; Rajesh, R.; Munim, Z.H. Supply chain resilience: A review, conceptual framework and future research. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2023, 34, 879–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Behroozi, F.; Monfared, M.; Hosseini, S.M.H. Investigating the conflicts between different stakeholders’ preferences in a blood supply chain at emergencies: A trade-off between six objectives. Soft Comput. 2021, 25, 13389–13410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Decastro-Pardo, M.; Pérez-Rodríguez, F.; Martín-Martín, J.M.; Azevedo, J.C. Modelling stakeholders’ preferences to pinpoint conflicts in the planning of transboundary protected areas. Land Use Policy 2019, 89, 104233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Govindan, K.; Agarwal, V.; Darbari, J.D.; Jha, P.C. An integrated decision making model for the selection of sustainable forward and reverse logistic providers. Ann. Oper. Res. 2019, 273, 607–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Afzalur Rahim, M. Toward a theory of managing organizational conflict. Int. J. Confl. Manag. 2002, 13, 206–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Baah, C.; Acquah, I.S.K.; Ofori, D. Exploring the influence of supply chain collaboration on supply chain visibility, stakeholder trust, environmental and financial performances: A partial least square approach. Benchmarking Int. J. 2022, 29, 172–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection process. Inclusion criteria included: (1) peer-reviewed journal articles, conference papers, and institutional reports; (2) publication between 2010 and 2025; (3) explicit relevance to CMS in SCM; and (4) empirical research (quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods) and robust conceptual frameworks. Exclusion criteria included: (1) non-English publications (unless translated and verified for accuracy); (2) studies unrelated to supply chain conflict management; (3) duplicate publications or preliminary versions without substantial empirical findings; and (4) low-quality studies based on critical appraisal. Crucially, the geographical focus prioritized studies specifically examining Jordan’s industrial sector, with global comparative studies included for broader contextual insights. A total of 119 studies were finally included in this systematic review, after 761 full-text articles were excluded due to reasons such as weak methodology, context not aligned with Jordan/emerging markets, or not being an empirical study.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection process. Inclusion criteria included: (1) peer-reviewed journal articles, conference papers, and institutional reports; (2) publication between 2010 and 2025; (3) explicit relevance to CMS in SCM; and (4) empirical research (quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods) and robust conceptual frameworks. Exclusion criteria included: (1) non-English publications (unless translated and verified for accuracy); (2) studies unrelated to supply chain conflict management; (3) duplicate publications or preliminary versions without substantial empirical findings; and (4) low-quality studies based on critical appraisal. Crucially, the geographical focus prioritized studies specifically examining Jordan’s industrial sector, with global comparative studies included for broader contextual insights. A total of 119 studies were finally included in this systematic review, after 761 full-text articles were excluded due to reasons such as weak methodology, context not aligned with Jordan/emerging markets, or not being an empirical study.
World 06 00086 g001
Table 1. Summary of conflict management strategies literature review.
Table 1. Summary of conflict management strategies literature review.
CategoryDescriptionImportance in Supply ChainRelevance in Jordan’s Food Manufacturing SectorCitations
Introduction to CMSStrategies pivotal for navigating supply chain complexities, enhancing efficiency, and improving stakeholder relationships.Vital for resolving disagreements, improving operational processes, and boosting overall performance.Essential for managing complexities and conflicts arising from internal and external factors, crucial for the sector’s sustainability and growth.[41,42,43,63]
CollaborationParties work jointly, sharing resources, knowledge, and capabilities for mutually beneficial outcomes.Mitigates risks, enhances efficiency, fosters innovation, and strengthens relationships.Instrumental for facing challenges like resource scarcity, geopolitical influences, and global market fluctuations. Enhances resource utilization and risk mitigation.[45,46,47,48,64,65]
AccommodationOne side willingly compromises, prioritizing others’ concerns and preferences.Preserves harmonious relationships, where stakeholder dynamics are disparate, and conflicting issues are non-central to outcomes.Vital for navigating various stakeholder expectations and regulatory frameworks, fortifying relationships, and ensuring a reliable supply chain.[49,50,52,66,67]
AvoidanceDeliberate disengagement from conflicts, neither addressing nor confronting the issue.Practical for bypassing disruptions unrelated to core operations, preserving operational flow, and avoiding unnecessary strain.Essential for maneuvering socio-political and economic conflicts, acting as a buffer against potential disruptions and maintaining consistent internal operations.[14,41,53,54]
CompromiseA mutual give-and-take approach to establish an acceptable solution, relinquishing certain stances.Ensures smooth operations amidst disagreements, finding a middle ground in disputes essential for process continuity.Prominent in managing diverse stakeholder interests, stabilizing supply chain segments, and maintaining operational flow without significant sacrifice.[55,56,57]
CompetitionHigh concern for one’s interests over others, potentially leading to win–lose outcomes.Can drive efficiency and innovation but may lead to conflicts if not managed adeptly, especially when resources are scarce or objectives conflict.Influences stakeholder negotiations and operational priorities, requiring adept management to prevent potential negative consequences like strained relationships.[14,58,59]
CMS in Jordan’s Food SectorEssential for managing diverse challenges within the food sector’s supply chain, influenced by various internal and external factors.Critical for managing discrepancies in interests, objectives, and operational preferences among stakeholders.Intensified need for adept CMS due to socio-economic and geopolitical challenges, ensuring stability and efficiency within the supply chain.[39,60,61,68]
Source: Authors’ compilation and synthesis based on the systematic literature review findings.
Table 2. CMS strategies across global contexts.
Table 2. CMS strategies across global contexts.
CMS StrategyJordan (Emerging Market)UAE (Advanced SCM Tech)Singapore (Regulated SCM)
CollaborationRelationship-based trustAI-driven coordinationGovernment-mandated SCM rules
AvoidanceConflict avoidance due to business risksRare due to strict compliancePenalized under strict SCM policies
CompetitionDominant retailers enforce strict supplier termsStrong government price controlsCompetitive SCM innovation
CompromiseInformal negotiation tactics Formalized dispute resolutionArbitration frameworks exist
AccommodationSupplier-driven flexibility due to power imbalancesBuyer-driven due to strict standardsLegally enforced SCM contracts
Source: Authors’ compilation and synthesis based on the systematic literature review findings.
Table 3. CMS outcomes across Jordan, UAE, and Singapore, emphasizing key performance indicators.
Table 3. CMS outcomes across Jordan, UAE, and Singapore, emphasizing key performance indicators.
CMS StrategyJordan (Emerging Market) OutcomesUAE OutcomesSingapore Outcomes
CollaborationIncreased supplier loyalty, slower tech adoptionFaster order fulfillment, AI-based collaborationHighly efficient dispute resolution, regulatory enforcement
AvoidanceSupplier retention but higher supply risksRisk minimization via tech-driven solutionsConflict escalation prevention due to strict laws
CompetitionCost pressures on suppliers, market fragmentationGovernment intervention, stabilized pricingCompetitive advantage through innovation
CompromiseFlexible but inconsistent SCM performanceLegal frameworks ensure enforceabilityHigh compliance, standardized negotiations
AccommodationPower imbalances, reactiveBalanced SCM relationshipsInstitutionalized supplier protection laws
Source: Authors’ compilation and synthesis based on the systematic literature review findings.
Table 4. SCOP components and their role in conflict resolution.
Table 4. SCOP components and their role in conflict resolution.
Supply Chain Operational ProcessHow It Mediates CMS → SCPExamples of CMS Influence
Production PlanningAligns production schedules with stakeholder expectations to reduce demand fluctuationsCollaboration CMS: Joint production planning enhances supply chain agility (Sarkis et al., 2022) [88]
Inventory ManagementBalances stock availability to mitigate supply chain disruptionsAvoidance CMS: Poor communication leads to stock shortages (Christopher & Holweg, 2017) [89]
DistributionOptimizes transportation and last-mile delivery, reducing delaysCompetitive CMS: Power asymmetries increase lead times for smaller suppliers (Ketchen & Hult, 2021) [90]
LogisticsEnhances resilience through technology-driven coordinationCompromise CMS: Shared logistics resources lower transportation costs (Prajogo et al., 2022) [91]
Source: Authors’ compilation and synthesis based on the systematic literature review findings.
Table 5. Summary of supply chain operational processes literature review.
Table 5. Summary of supply chain operational processes literature review.
Supply Chain Operational ProcessDescriptionKey PointsCitations
OverviewThe backbone of the food manufacturing sector, crucial for efficient and effective production, storage, and delivery to meet consumer demand.
-
Nuanced due to perishable products.
-
Requires efficient strategies for production, inventory, distribution, and logistics.
[74,75,76,77,98]
Production PlanningEnsures items are created efficiently, deciding what to make, its volume, and production timing. Tackles challenges like changing demand and resource limits.
-
Influences supply chain performance metrics.
-
Essential in resolving supply chain disagreements.
[78,79,80,81,82]
Inventory ManagementOversight of non-capitalized assets, stock items, and inventory levels. Balances costs with the benefits of meeting demand.
-
Linked to product quality and waste minimization.
-
Techniques like JIT and EOQ are crucial.
[29,61,83,84,85]
DistributionStrategic dissemination of products from manufacturers to consumers. Involves logistical and strategic endeavors affecting performance and relationships.
-
Essential for maintaining product freshness and quality.
-
Mitigates stakeholder conflicts through reliable delivery.
[86,87]
LogisticsCoordinated management of movement and storage of goods in the supply chain. Ensures seamless operation amidst various challenges.
-
Minimizes costs, optimizes efficiency.
-
Influences performance and stakeholder satisfaction.
[27,37]
SCOP in Jordan’s ContextInfluenced by geopolitical, economic, and stakeholder complexities. Necessitates resilient processes for optimal performance.
-
Integration with conflict management strategies is crucial.
-
Must be adaptive and aligned with socio-economic factors.
[39,41,60,82,95,96,97]
Source: Authors’ compilation and synthesis based on the systematic literature review findings.
Table 6. Summary of supply chain performance literature review.
Table 6. Summary of supply chain performance literature review.
SectionSummaryReferences
Introduction to SCP Metrics and ImportanceSCP is critical for assessing supply chain efficiency and effectiveness, impacting competitive advantage and customer satisfaction. It is crucial in the food sector due to product perishability, quality standards, and logistical challenges.[28,89]
Cost of Supply ChainManaging costs is essential for profitability, requiring strategic planning, especially in food manufacturing. External factors like geopolitical issues and resource scarcity significantly influence cost management.[108,110,111]
Quality of Supply ChainQuality in SCP goes beyond product excellence, requiring adherence to safety standards and consistent output, especially under geopolitical and resource challenges in regions like Jordan.[113,115]
Responsiveness in Supply ChainResponsiveness in SCP involves meeting market demands promptly, crucial for customer loyalty and brand image, especially in conflict-prone regions. The impact of CMS on responsiveness is notable.[14,27]
Flexibility in Supply ChainSCP flexibility refers to adapting to disruptions and market variations, which is vital in volatile sectors like food manufacturing in Jordan. CMS play a key role in maintaining operational adaptability.[38,119]
SCP in Jordan’s Food Manufacturing IndustrySCP efficiency in Jordan’s food sector is vital for national economic stability and food security, as it faces challenges due to reliance on imports and various conflicts. Effective CMS is essential for enhancing SCP amidst these challenges.[13,120]
Source: Authors’ compilation and synthesis based on the systematic literature review findings.
Table 7. Summary of moderating variables literature review.
Table 7. Summary of moderating variables literature review.
SectionSubsectionDescriptionCitation
Relationship Characteristics—Power DynamicsIntroduction to Power Dynamics in Supply ChainsPower dynamics refer to the asymmetrical influence among entities in supply chains, with some organizations having significant control over terms, decisions, and resources.[121]
Types and Sources of Power in Supply ChainsVarious types of power exist, including coercive, reward, legitimate, referent, and expert power, each arising from unique sources and affecting entities differently.[90]
Relevance of Power Dynamics in Conflict ManagementPower dynamics critically influence conflict management strategies in supply chains, with powerful entities enforcing strategies that can range from collaboration to competition.[122,123]
Relevance of Power Dynamics in SCOP and SCPPower dynamics affect operational decisions in supply chains, such as production strategies and inventory management, thereby impacting overall productivity.[36,122]
Power Dynamics in Jordan’s Food Manufacturing SectorIn Jordan’s food industry, power dynamics are influenced by factors like market dominance, resource control, and global reach, affecting pricing, quality, and delivery decisions.[121,124]
Conflict Characteristics—Long-term Relationship and Conflict IntensityLong-term Relationship and Conflict Intensity: An OverviewLong-standing relationships and conflict intensity are key in understanding stakeholder interactions within supply chains, involving elements of cooperation, shared benefits, and goal alignment.[124,125]
Relevance of Long-term Relationships in Conflict ManagementLong-term relationships contribute to a culture of trust and mutual reliance, reducing conflicts and encouraging collaborative problem solving.[67]
Conflict Intensity and Its ImplicationsThe severity of conflicts influences the choice of management strategy, with high-intensity conflicts necessitating structured resolution methods.[13]
Conflict Characteristics within Jordan’s Food Manufacturing SectorIn Jordan, long-term partnerships are crucial for supply chain stability, whereas conflict intensity, influenced by various operational factors, requires careful management to preserve business relationships.[126,127] Zureiqat & Ostermeier, 2022; Al-Hyari, 2023
Source: Authors’ compilation and synthesis based on the systematic literature review findings.
Table 8. Summary of linking CMS strategies to relevant SDGs and smart city relevance.
Table 8. Summary of linking CMS strategies to relevant SDGs and smart city relevance.
CMS StrategySmart City RelevanceRelevant SDGs
CollaborationIoT-enabled transparency and coordinationSDG 9, SDG 11, SDG 17
AccommodationTechnology-driven regulatory complianceSDG 16, SDG 17
AvoidanceDigital risk monitoringSDG 9, SDG 12
CompromiseSmart logistics sharingSDG 11, SDG 17
CompetitionBlockchain-driven fair competitionSDG 9, SDG 12
Source: Authors’ compilation and synthesis based on the systematic literature review findings.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Almasri, A.; Ying, M.; Aljaber, R.; Namahoro, J.P. Evaluating Conflict Management Strategies and Supply Chain Performance: A Systematic Literature Review Within Jordan’s Food Manufacturing Sector. World 2025, 6, 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/world6020086

AMA Style

Almasri A, Ying M, Aljaber R, Namahoro JP. Evaluating Conflict Management Strategies and Supply Chain Performance: A Systematic Literature Review Within Jordan’s Food Manufacturing Sector. World. 2025; 6(2):86. https://doi.org/10.3390/world6020086

Chicago/Turabian Style

Almasri, Aydah, Ma Ying, Reem Aljaber, and Jean Pierre Namahoro. 2025. "Evaluating Conflict Management Strategies and Supply Chain Performance: A Systematic Literature Review Within Jordan’s Food Manufacturing Sector" World 6, no. 2: 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/world6020086

APA Style

Almasri, A., Ying, M., Aljaber, R., & Namahoro, J. P. (2025). Evaluating Conflict Management Strategies and Supply Chain Performance: A Systematic Literature Review Within Jordan’s Food Manufacturing Sector. World, 6(2), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/world6020086

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop