Digital Twins for Construction Projects—Developing a Risk Systematization Approach to Facilitate Anomaly Detection in Smart Buildings
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Unexpected or changing environmental conditions;
- An imbalance in the workforce and the result of the employees;
- Accidents for human resources that cause bodily injury;
- Technical anomalies such as design, workmanship and technical issues;
- The occurrence of fire, earthquakes or approaching dangerous places;
- Cybersecurity and privacy issues related to the employment of digital technologies;
- Interfacing problems generated by integrating different solutions;
- Insufficient or conflicting solutions from the DTCP database;
- Intentional damage, theft or other crime inflicted by third parties.
2. Methodology
- The use of mostly recent studies and articles that were published during the past five years, 2017–2022, in order to keep pace with recent developments and generate a correct image about risk management and the role of digital twins in it;
- The selection was performed using the databases of ScienceDirect and Google Scholar, which cover a large variety of the scientific publications in this domain;
- In the searches, the study used keywords derived from our initial concept DTCP, namely “digital twins for construction projects”, in various combinations.
- The brainstorming of possible configurations of the technical systems needed to assist the project managers to conduct the risk management process;
- The aggregation of information into generic solutions that reflect the sum of previous experiences encountered in construction projects by the authors;
- The discussion of possible use cases in which the proposed approach can be implemented successfully to deliver a perceivable impact.
3. Results
3.1. Analysis of Digital Systems in Construction Management
3.2. Analysis of Risk Management in Construction through Digital Twins
- Construction Planning and Monitoring Management (CPMM).
- Construction Security and Safety Management (CSSM).
- Construction Quality Management (CQM).
- Construction Human Resource Management (CHRM).
- Construction Execution Activities Management (CEAM).
4. Discussion
- Safe condition: the process proceeds normally by sending the data from the physical environment to the virtual system and then analyzing and comparing it with the stored data according to the safety and security procedures provided.
- Unsafe condition: the physical system is tracked, and the data is sent through the sensors to the virtual system and then comparisons are made between the physical state and the stored data to determine the proper project intervention.
- Warning and recording: gives advanced notice about the risks and records them to start the verification procedures; the warning can be through sound or light signals, messages on the display screens and other methods (e.g., mobile alerts), and then the process of recording the risk is conducted by the system to supply the process of preventive interventions in the future.
- Define the risks: the risks are identified in the system so that it can, through the tracking process, make a correct determination and classification; the risks are revealed based on the information provided in the system about the definition of risks, while the decision makers are provided with flexible and understandable reports that reflect the state of the work environment and the expected issues.
- Risk analysis: is divided into two parts, probability analysis and impact analysis, usually in the form of a Risk Matrix (see Table 1 (A) below for a consecrated version of this matrix).
- Probability analysis: measures the degree of plausibility of an event being triggered that can influence the outcome of the construction project.
- Impact analysis: measures the degree of deviation from the desired results brought upon by the consequences of the unwanted event.
- Determining the level of risk: based on the criteria that are entered according to the risk matrix, where the degrees and levels of risks are defined, the system classifies the risks using the bidimensional scale and previous history (see Table 1B below for a proposed adjusted matrix that uses the DTCP concept as it was expanded in this paper, to incorporate the features of digital twins and eliminate redundant or excess work while facilitating improved anomaly treatment).
- Risk assessment: the system, based on the ratings and levels defined above, evaluates the risks as Extreme, High, Medium, Low and Very low, and determines guidelines for intervention.
- Risk mitigation and intervention: The DTCP is operated in the detection and examination of anomalies, and then the risks are characterized and evaluated based on the degrees and levels proposed. If there is no risk, the process can be accomplished as is, but if the risk requires intervention, then security, safety and operational measures are taken to mitigate it and the process is entered into the system again to conduct rechecking. Based on our previous experience in the AEC sector, we recommend mitigation to follow the guidelines comprised in Table 1 (B), by addressing the probability of the hazard to materialize as the impact is usually difficult to reduce. The goal is to use the DTCP to reduce occurrences in such a way that the overall risk assessment falls mostly in the area of low and very low risks. The means to accomplish these reductions depend on the structure, context and contents of each construction project.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Akrouche, J.; Sallak, M.; Châtelet, E.; Abdallah, F.; Chehade, H.H. Methodology for the Assessment of Imprecise Multi-State System Availability. Mathematics 2022, 10, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alhammadi, S.A.; Tayeh, B.; Alaloul, W.; Salem, T. Risk Management Strategies in Construction Organizations. Open Civ. Eng. J. 2021, 15, 406–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boje, C.; Guerriero, A.; Kubicki, S.; Rezgui, Y. Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research. Autom. Constr. 2020, 114, 103179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bortolini, R.; Rodrigues, R.; Alavi, H.; Dalla Vecchia, L.F.; Forcada, N. Digital Twins’ Applications for Building Energy Efficiency: A Review. Energies 2022, 15, 7002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dalglish, S.L.; Khalid, H.; McMahon, S.A. Document analysis in health policy research: The READ approach. Health Policy Plan. 2020, 35, 1424–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Deng, M.; Menassa, C.C.; Kamat, V.R. From BIM to digital twins: A systematic review of the evolution of intelligent building representations in the AEC-FM industry. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2021, 26, 58–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deria, A.; Ghannad, P.; Lee, Y.-C. Integrating AI in an Audio-Based Digital Twin for Autonomous Management of Roadway Construction. In Construction Research Congress; ASCE: Arlington, VA, USA, 2022; pp. 530–540. [Google Scholar]
- Draghici, A.; Dursun, S.; Bașol, O.; Boatca, M.E.; Gaureanu, A. The Mediating Role of Safety Climate in the Relationship between Transformational Safety Leadership and Safe Behavior—The Case of Two Companies in Turkey and Romania. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, D.; Huang, Y.; Guo, H.; Lim, H.W. LCB approach for construction safety. Saf. Sci. 2020, 128, 104761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, Q.; Li, H.; Luo, X.; Ding, L.; Luo, H.; Li, C. Computer vision aided inspection on falling prevention measures for steeplejacks in an aerial environment. Autom. Constr. 2018, 93, 148–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, W.; Zhong, B.; Zhao, n.; Love, P.E.; Luo, H.; Xue, J.; Xu, S. A deep learning-based approach for mitigating falls from height with computer vision: Convolutional neural network. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2019, 39, 170–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gatti, U.C.; Schneider, S.; Migliaccio, G.C. Physiological condition monitoring of construction workers. Autom. Constr. 2014, 44, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gattullo, M.; Scurati, G.W.; Fiorentino, M.; Uva, A.E.; Ferrise, F.; Bordegoni, M. Towards augmented reality manuals for industry. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 2019, 56, 276–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greif, T.; Stein, N.; Flath, C.M. Peeking into the void: Digital twins for construction site logistics. Comput. Ind. 2020, 121, 103264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Song, X. CPS-Based Self-Adaptive Collaborative Control for Smart Production-Logistics System. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 2020, 51, 188–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Han, S.; Lee, S. A vision-based motion capture and recognition framework for behavior-based safety management. Autom. Constr. 2013, 35, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hongling, G.; Yu, Y.; Ding, Q.; Skitmore, M. Image-and-Skeleton-Based Parameterized Approach to Real-Time Identification of Construction Workers’ Unsafe Behaviors. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2018, 144, 04018042. [Google Scholar]
- Hou, L.; Wu, S.; Zhang, G.; Tan, Y.; Wang, X. Literature Review of Digital Twins Applications in Construction Workforce Safety. Appl. Sci. 2020, 11, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Azamfar, M.; Singh, J.; Siahpour, S. Integration of digital twin and deep learning in cyber-physical systems: Towards smart manufacturing. IET Collab. Intell. Manuf. 2020, 2, 34–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Li, X.; Luo, X.; Sibert, J. Investigation of the causality patterns of non-helmet use behavior of construction workers. Autom. Constr. 2017, 80, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M.; Lu, Q.; Bai, S.; Zhang, M.; Tian, H.; Qin, L. Digital twin-driven virtual sensor approach for safe construction operations of trailing suction hopper dredger. Autom. Constr. 2021, 132, 103961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Opoku, D.-G.J.; Perera, S.; Osei-Kyei, R.; Rashidi, M. Digital twin application in the construction industry: A literature review. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 40, 102726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozturk, G.B. Digital Twin Research in the AECO-FM Industry. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 40, 102730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, M.W.; Elsafty, N.; Zhu, Z. Hardhat-Wearing Detection for Enhancing On-Site Safety of Construction Workers. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2015, 141, 04015024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patias, I.P. Engineering and construction project management in the digital twin era. In Proceedings of the CBU International Conference on Innovations in Science and Education 2020 (Natural Sciences and ICT), Prague, Czech Republic, 18–20 March 2020; CBU Research Institute: Prague, Czech Republic, 2020; pp. 85–90. [Google Scholar]
- Qi, Q.; Tao, F.; Zuo, Y.; Zhao, D. Digital Twin Service towards Smart Manufacturing. Proceedia CIRP 2018, 72, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rafsanjani, H.N.; Nabizadeh, A.H. Towards digital architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry through virtual design and construction (VDC) and digital twin. Energy Built Environ. 2023, 4, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reja, V.K.; Varghese, K. Digital Twin Applications for Construction Project Management. In Proceedings of the Joint Indo-Japanese Smart City Symposium (IJSCS-2022), Chennai, India, 24–25 March 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Saco, Z.M.; Burhan, A.M. Construction Risk Management. J. Eng. 2006, 12, 373–378. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330638915_CONSTRUCTION_RISK_MANAGEMENT (accessed on 9 November 2022).
- Salem, T.; Dragomir, M. Options for and Challenges of Employing Digital Twins in construction Management. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahzad, M.; Shafiq, M.T.; Douglas, D.; Kassem, M. Digital Twins in Built Environments: An Investigation of the Characteristics, Applications, and Challenges. Buildings 2022, 12, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, F.; Qi, Q.; Wang, L.; Nee, A. Digital Twins and Cyber–Physical Systems toward Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0: Correlation and Comparison. Engineering 2019, 5, 653–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tayeh, B.; Salem, T.; Aisheh, Y.I.; Alaloul, W. Risk Factors Affecting the Performance of Construction Projects in Gaza Strip. Open Civ. Eng. J. 2020, 14, 94–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teisserenc, B.; Sepasgozar, S. Adoption of Blockchain Technology through Digital Twins in the Construction Industry 4.0: A PESTELS Approach. Buildgings 2021, 11, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Guo, H.; Li, X.; Tang, S.; Li, Y.; Xie, L.; Lv, Z. BIM Information Integration Based VR Modeling in Digital Twins in Industry 5.0. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2022, 28, 100351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, P.; Li, N.; Jiang, Z.; Fang, D.; Anumba, C.J. An agent-based modeling approach for understanding the effect of workermanagement interactions on construction workers’ safety-related behaviors. Autom. Constr. 2019, 97, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variant—A | Impact | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Probability | Extreme | High | Medium | Low | Very low |
Extreme | Extreme | Extreme | High | Medium | Medium |
High | Extreme | Extreme | High | Medium | Low |
Medium | High | High | Medium | Low | Low |
Low | High | Medium | Medium | Low | Very low |
Very low | Medium | Medium | Low | Low | Very low |
Risk assess. | Extreme | High | Medium | Low | Very low |
Variant—B | Impact | ||||
Probability | Extreme | High | Medium | Low | Very low |
Extreme | High | High | Medium | Low | Low |
High | High | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Medium | Medium | Low | Low | Low | Very low |
Low | Medium | Low | Low | Very low | Very low |
Very low | Low | Low | Very low | Very low | Very low |
Risk assess. | Medium | Low | L ow | Very low | Very low |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Salem, T.; Dragomir, M. Digital Twins for Construction Projects—Developing a Risk Systematization Approach to Facilitate Anomaly Detection in Smart Buildings. Telecom 2023, 4, 135-145. https://doi.org/10.3390/telecom4010009
Salem T, Dragomir M. Digital Twins for Construction Projects—Developing a Risk Systematization Approach to Facilitate Anomaly Detection in Smart Buildings. Telecom. 2023; 4(1):135-145. https://doi.org/10.3390/telecom4010009
Chicago/Turabian StyleSalem, Tareq, and Mihai Dragomir. 2023. "Digital Twins for Construction Projects—Developing a Risk Systematization Approach to Facilitate Anomaly Detection in Smart Buildings" Telecom 4, no. 1: 135-145. https://doi.org/10.3390/telecom4010009
APA StyleSalem, T., & Dragomir, M. (2023). Digital Twins for Construction Projects—Developing a Risk Systematization Approach to Facilitate Anomaly Detection in Smart Buildings. Telecom, 4(1), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.3390/telecom4010009