Previous Article in Journal
A Prudent Approach to Reduce CO2 Emissions While Enhancing Oil Recovery
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tuning Chemical Looping Steam Reforming of Methane Performance via Ni-Fe-Al Interaction in Spinel Ferrites

School of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fuels 2025, 6(4), 76; https://doi.org/10.3390/fuels6040076
Submission received: 7 July 2025 / Revised: 22 August 2025 / Accepted: 1 October 2025 / Published: 3 October 2025

Abstract

The chemical looping steam reforming of methane (CLSR) employing Fe-containing oxygen carriers can produce syngas and hydrogen simultaneously. However, Fe-based oxygen carriers exhibit low CH4 activation ability and cyclic stability. In this work, oxygen carriers with fixed Fe content and different Fe/Ni ratios were synthesized by the sol–gel method to investigate the effects of Ni-Fe-Al interactions on CLSR performance. Ni-Fe-Al interactions promote the growth of the spinel structure and regulate both the catalytic sites and the available lattice oxygen, resulting in the CH4 conversion and CO selectivity being maintained at 96–98% and above 98% for the most promising oxygen carrier, with an Fe2O3 content of 20 wt% and Fe/Ni molar ratio of 10. The surface, phase, and particle size were kept the same over 90 cycles, leading to high stability. During the CLSR cycles, conversion from Fe3+ to Fe2+/Fe0 occurs, along with transformation between Ni2+ in NiAl2O4 and Ni0. Overall, the results demonstrate the feasibility of using spinel containing earth-abundant elements in CLSR and the importance of cooperation between oxygen release and CH4 activation.

1. Introduction

Global warming caused by the excessive combustion of fossil fuels has attracted increasing attention [1,2]. Hydrogen, as an alternative energy carrier, has a high calorific value (142 MJ/kg) and only produces H2O during utilization. It is also an important industrial intermediate in crude oil refining and ammonia production. Therefore, the demand for H2 is increasing [3,4]. However, most H2 in industry is currently produced from the steam reforming of methane, leading to CO2 emission problems [5,6]. Therefore, it is important to develop a novel process for producing H2 with CO2 capture from fuels.
The chemical looping steam reforming of methane (CLSR) is a process that decouples the steam reforming of methane into reactions occurring in a fuel reactor and a steam reactor with metal oxides as the oxygen carriers (OCs). As shown in Figure 1, methane is partially oxidized by OC in the fuel reactor to produce syngas, and H2O is split in the steam reactor to produce H2 and regenerate OC. Through the repeated reduction and oxidation of OC, methane is converted into syngas with an ideal molar ratio of 2 for downstream industries while producing pure hydrogen [7,8,9,10]. OC provides lattice oxygen and forms active sites for reactions during CLSR [11,12,13,14]. Although iron oxides are promising because of their favorable thermodynamics for water splitting, low price, wide availability, etc., they exhibit low reactivity towards CH4 and suffer deactivation through sintering at high temperature [15,16,17,18,19]. Therefore, it is important to develop novel Fe-based OCs for CLSR.
To promote the reactivity and stability of a novel Fe-based OC, various supports [20,21,22] (Al2O3, CeO2, LaFeO3, etc.) and foreign promoters [23,24] (Ni, Co, Cu, etc.) are chosen to modify the bulk and surface. Among supports, Al2O3 is commonly used because of its low cost, high mechanical strength, and high melting point, which greatly improve stability at high temperature [25]. However, the formation of FeAl2O4 spinel hinders hydrogen production when applying the Fe2O3/Al2O3 OC for CLSR [26]. When foreign promoters are introduced, the catalytic sites of CH4 and lattice oxygen transfer activity are influenced simultaneously [27]. According to the existing results, Ni clearly reduces the energy barrier for C-H bond cleavage [28], but the Fe-Ni bimetallic OC faces problems: severe carbon deposition due to the strong catalytic effect of the Fe-Ni alloy and deactivation because of phase separation [29,30]. Therefore, the NiFeAlO OC could be a feasible solution to the conflict between reactivity and stability. Cui et al. reports that a NiFeAlO OC showed a high oxygen transport capacity and redox stability in chemical looping combustion [31]. Kim et al. investigated an Al-incorporated NiFe2O4 particle for chemical looping hydrogen production and found that Al incorporation prevented the densification of the OC [32]. Based on characterization results, the NiFeAlO OC exhibits promising performance in chemical looping processes because of the formation of spinel structure and the exsolution of Ni during reduction. Recently, the coordination environment of the atom has been employed to regulate OC reactivity [33,34,35,36]. This strategy has also been proved feasible by our previous work through varying the Mg/Fe ratio of a MgFeAlO OC, but the CH4 conversion was not satisfactory due to limited surface active sites. Similarly, Ni, Fe, and Al could exist in the tetrahedral and octahedral interstices of the spinel structure [37,38], potentially leading to different types of lattice oxygen transfer and surface active site formation in CLSR. Hence, the Ni-Fi-Al interactions and the reaction mechanism during CLSR are worth studying.
This work synthesized a series of NiFeAlO OCs with fixed Fe2O3 content and varying Fe/Ni ratios and explored the effects of Ni-Fe-Al interactions on CLSR performance in detail. Firstly, the phase was revealed using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD), and the bulk lattice oxygen activity was studied through H2 temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR) and density functional theory (DFT) calculation. Also, the surface reactivity toward CH4 was investigated utilizing CH4 temperature-programmed reduction (CH4-TPR). Then, cyclic CLSR experiments were conducted in a lab-scale fluidized bed reactor and the changes in OCs were characterized. Finally, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was applied to study the chemical states of the OCs, reflecting the reaction mechanism.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Oxygen Carrier Preparation

NiFeAlO OCs were prepared by the sol–gel method with Fe/Ni molar ratios of 20, 10, 7.5, and 5, and named FeNi20Al, FeNi10Al, FeNi7.5Al, and FeNi5Al. Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Shanghai, China), Al(NO3)3·9H2O (Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Shanghai, China), and Ni(CH3COO)2·4H2O (Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Shanghai, China) acted as sources of Fe, Al, and Ni, with citric acid (Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Shanghai, China) and ethanediol (Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Shanghai, China) as complexing agents. The amount of starting materials was calculated according to three principles, namely, the predicted mass, the controlled content of Fe with Fe2O3 at 20 wt% [39], and the designed molar ratio of Ni and Al. Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, Al(NO3)3·9H2O, and Ni(CH3COO)2·4H2O were dissolved in deionized water, where the molar ratio between the metal ions and H2O was 1:10. Then, citric acid was introduced to the mixture, and the molar ratio between the citric acid and total metal ions was 1:1. The solution was then heated to 80 °C with continuous stirring, and ethanediol was added at 1.5 times the amount of citric acid in moles until the sol was formed. Then, the resulting sol was aged overnight and dried at 120 °C for 12 h. The dried gel was calcined at 350 °C for 2 h to remove carbonaceous residues. The obtained powder was tableted and calcined at 1000 °C for 5 h. Finally, the oxygen carriers were sieved to a size range of 0.15–0.30 mm.

2.2. Experimental Setup

A fluidized bed reactor with a quartz tube (inner diameter of 8 mm) was adapted to evaluate the CLSR performance. A total of 1 g of oxygen carriers was loaded in each test. The reaction temperature was monitored using a thermocouple near the middle part of the oxygen carrier bed, and the flow rates of the reaction gases were controlled using mass flow meters. One CLSR cycle comprised two stages, i.e., the reduction and oxidation stages. The flow rate of the inert carrier gas N2 was 90 mL/min. After the OC was heated to 900 °C under an air atmosphere, 10 mL/min of CH4 entered the quartz tube and reduced the OCs during the reduction stage. Thereafter, the purge stage was used to avoid mixing of the products in the reduction and oxidation stages. In the subsequent oxidation stage, steam generated from a 25 μL/min flow of water was applied for hydrogen production. The exhaust gas was dried and finally analyzed using a gas analyzer (MRU GmbH, Neckarsulm, Germany).
In the reduction stage, the oxygen carrier’s performance was evaluated before obvious carbon deposition occurred because the hydrogen purity can be affected by carbon entering the oxidation stage. The decline in CO flow rate was the starting signal for obvious carbon deposition. To ensure the reliability of the data, a carbon balance was considered. The error E was calculated as
E = ( n CH 4 , out + n CO 2 , out + n CO , out + 0.5 * ( n H 2 , out 2 * n CO , out ) ) / n CH 4 , in * 100 %
where n CH 4 , in is the molar flow of CH4 in the inlet feed. n CO 2 , out , n CO , out , n H 2 , out , and n CH 4 , out are the molar flows of CO2, CO, H2, and CH4, respectively, in the effluents. This error value was controlled between 90% and 110% throughout this work.
In addition, the CH4 conversion X CH 4 (%), CO selectivity S CO (%), oxygen capacity n O (mmol/gOC), and oxygen release rate ν (μmol/(s·gOC)) can be obtained in the CH4 reduction stage.
X CH 4 = ( n CH 4 , in n CH 4 , out ) / n CH 4 , in * 100 %
S CO = n CO , out / ( n CH 4 , in n CH 4 , out ) * 100 %
n O = 4 * n CO 2 , out , 1 + n CO , out
ν = n O / t

2.3. Oxygen Carrier Characterization

The crystal phase was detected by XRD in a Smartlab diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation from 20° to 80° at a speed of 10°/min. H2-TPR was performed to evaluate the activity of lattice oxygen in a fixed bed reactor and a TCD analyzer under a 10% H2/Ar mixture (50 mL/min) over 100 mg of OC, using a heating rate of 10 °C/min from 200 °C to 1000 °C. A DFT calculation was carried out using the QUANTUM-ESPRESSO open-source software package, employing the PBE exchange functional and GBRV ultrasoft pseudopotentials. The kinetic energy cutoffs for wavefunctions and charge density were set at 40 Ry and 400 Ry. Meanwhile, a 5 × 5 × 5 Monkhorst−Pack k-point mesh and Gaussian smearing were applied. The oxygen vacancy formation energy was calculated from the energy of a stoichiometric crystal Etot, the energy of a reduced crystal with one oxygen vacancy Ev, and the energy of an O2 molecule EO2 (Ev + 0.5*EO2-Etot). The model with a lower oxygen vacancy formation energy tends to release oxygen more easily. Meanwhile, CH4-TPR experiments were performed to investigate the oxygen release of the oxygen carrier in a CH4 atmosphere. In a typical experiment, 0.3 g of the OC sample was loaded into a fluidized bed reactor. The sample was then heated from 250 °C to 900 °C at a linear ramp rate of 10 °C/min under a continuous flow (100 mL/min) of a 10% CH4/N2 gas mixture. The composition of the reactor effluent was continuously monitored using an online gas analyzer (MRU VARIO Plus). The reaction mechanism was explored according to the valence state and surface element composition through XPS, which was conducted on a spectrometer equipped with a monochromatic Al Kα source. The C 1s at 284.8 eV was used for calibration.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Interaction Between Ni, Fe, and Al

The XRD patterns of oxygen carriers after calcination in Figure 2 were used to analyze the effects of Ni-Fe-Al interactions on the obtained phase. The diffractogram reveals that fresh NiFeAlO OCs predominantly consist of three phases: Fe2O3 (PDF #89-8104), Al2O3 (PDF #75-0782), and spinel (PDF #89-1696). Among the OCs, only the FeNi20Al exhibits the presence of the Fe2O3 phase, and no phases containing Ni are detected. The absence of Ni-related peaks is attributed to the low loading of nickel combined with its high dispersion on the support and peak overlap. Furthermore, as the Ni content increases, the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the characteristic peak at 36.0° decreases from 0.29 in the FeNi20Al OC to 0.26 in the FeNi10Al OC to 0.22 in the FeNi7.5Al OC to 0.20 in the FeNi5Al OC. According to Scherrer’s formula, this suggests that the grain size of the spinel phase in the FeNi5Al OC is larger than that in the FeNi20Al OC. Therefore, the addition of Ni promotes the growth of spinel.
The effects of Ni-Fe-Al interactions on the oxygen release can be judged from the H2 consumption curves for the H2-TPR of the fresh NiFeAlO OCs in Figure 3. It is evident that oxygen release from the OC occurs after 800 °C, higher than the reduction temperature for nickel oxides and iron oxides in the existing reports. Combined with the XRD results, these results show that the oxygen release results from the reduction in spinel. Also, the Fe/Ni ratio has significant effects on the peak area but limited effects on the peak position. Therefore, the movement of Ni atoms into the spinel structure increases the amount of available lattice oxygen rather than the lattice oxygen activity, further proved by the following DFT results.
The oxygen vacancy formation energy calculated using density functional theory (DFT), shown in Figure 4, was also employed to explore the effects of the Ni-Fe-Al interactions on the lattice oxygen activity in spinel. Based on the FeAl2O4 lattice, the (NiFe)Al2O4 present in Figure 4b was obtained by substituting an Fe atom with a Ni atom, and Fe(FeAl)2O4 was constructed by replacing an Al atom with an Fe atom. Further, two kinds of (NiFe)(FeAl)2O4 were produced, as shown in Figure 4c,d, through replacing an Fe atom in the A site of Fe(FeAl)2O4 with a Ni atom. Upon comparing FeAl2O4 with Fe(FeAl)2O4, it can be observed that Fe atoms in the B site of the spinel structure (AB2O4) benefit the lattice activity. Doping the spinel structure with Ni atoms did not decrease the oxygen vacancy formation energy, meaning that there was no significant improvement in lattice oxygen activity.
The effects of Ni-Fe-Al interactions on the CH4 activation can be observed from the CH4-TPR results for the four OCs in Figure 5. The release of lattice oxygen is divided into two stages: low temperature (650–750 °C) and high temperature (750–950 °C). The low-temperature stage is attributed to the reaction of CH4 with the highly active surface and near-surface lattice oxygen of the oxygen carrier. These oxygen species are more mobile or have weaker bonds with the metal cations, allowing them to be reduced by CH4 at a lower temperature. The high-temperature stage corresponds to the reaction of CH4 with the bulk lattice oxygen. The migration of bulk lattice oxygen to the surface to participate in the reaction requires a higher activation energy and thus higher temperature. The deviation of the ratio of H2 to CO from 2 is caused by side reactions. The reaction at low temperature is steam methane reforming (CH4 + H2O → CO + 3H2), while that at high temperature is methane cracking (CH4 → CO + 2H2). Also, the initial release temperature for lattice oxygen is 650 °C for all the OCs, significantly lower than the 800 °C during the H2-TPR process. This suggests that a small quantity of Ni in the FeNi20Al OC provides sufficient catalytic sites. Meanwhile, the CH4 conversion rate in the low-temperature region firstly rises and then declines as the Ni content increases, but a clear increasing trend in the oxygen release capacity of the OCs can be seen with increasing Ni content in the high-temperature region. Overall, the CH4-TPR and H2-TPR results demonstrate that the Ni-Fe-Al interactions enhance both the catalytic sites and the available lattice oxygen.

3.2. CLSR Performance of OCs

Figure 6 presents the outlet flows of CO2, CO, H2, and CH4 during the 2nd to 10th CH4 reduction stages. The variations in the CH4 conversion, CO selectivity, oxygen capacity, and oxygen release rate for FeNixAl before carbon deposition are shown in Figure 7, from which the reactivity and stability of the oxygen carriers can be judged. The 2nd to 10th CH4 reduction stages mainly consist of two stages, partial oxidation and rapid decomposition. Reducing the Ni content improves the CO selectivity, and the lowest CO selectivity of the FeNi5Al OC is more than 93%. The CO selectivity of FeNi20Al is close to 100% because it hardly detects CO2 in the 2nd–10th CH4 reduction stages. With an increase in CLSR cycles, the partial oxidation reaction of CH4 tends to shift backward to varying degrees, resulting in a decrease in CH4 conversion. The most obvious change in CH4 conversion occurs with the FeNi20Al OC, from 92% to 85%. The FeNi10Al OC shows a slight decrease in CH4 conversion, and the CH4 conversions of the FeNi7.5Al and FeNi5Al OCs remain at 97%. However, the oxygen capacity of each OC before carbon deposition remains almost the same, and the oxygen capacities of FeNi20Al, FeNi10Al, FeNi7.5Al, and FeNi5Al are 0.7 mmol/gOC, 1.0 mmol/gOC, 0.9 mmol/gOC, and 1.0 mmol/gOC, respectively. The oxygen capacity does not monotonically increase, indicating that the oxygen release before carbon deposition is related not only to the amount of lattice oxygen available in the oxygen carrier but also to the surface catalytic sites such as Ni0 and Fe0. Too many catalytic sites cause rapid cracking of CH4, and the generated carbon cannot be consumed immediately, leading to its transformation into inert carbon [40]. In addition, increasing the Ni content benefits the lattice oxygen release rate, but the FeNi10Al can reach 6.5 μmol/(s·gOC), which is close to the 7.0 μmol/(s·gOC) for the FeNi5Al.
The XRD patterns of the OCs after the 10th cycle are illustrated in Figure 8. Only two phases, Al2O3 and Fe-Al-O spinel, are observed in the used OCs. The spinel formed during the deep reduction of Fe2O3 cannot be regenerated by steam. No Ni-containing impurities are detected even after 10 cycles, suggesting the uniform dispersion of Ni atoms without significant precipitation. The consistency in the FWHM of the Al2O3 phase among various OCs indicates the high-temperature stability of Al2O3. The most significant change during cycling is observed for the spinel, with the characteristic peak shifting from 36.0° to 36.5°. This shift towards larger angles is ascribed to the incorporation of Ni atoms into the spinel, as the characteristic peak of NiAl2O4 is at a higher angle than FeAl2O4. Additionally, the reduction in the FWHM of the spinel phase around 36.5° for each cycled OC compared with fresh OC suggests a growth trend for the crystallite. Consequently, the increased Ni incorporation into the spinel and the growth of the spinel phase are identified as the main reasons for the decline in CH4 conversion rate during cycling.
The H2 consumption curves for the H2-TPR of NiFeAlO OCs after the 10th CLSR cycle are illustrated in Figure 9. There is minimal fluctuation in the oxygen release temperature of the OC after the 10th cycle, compared with Figure 3. The high oxygen release temperature also indicates a reduction in spinel. However, the decrease in peak area indicates a reduction in the available lattice oxygen, and OCs with higher Ni content exhibit a more pronounced decline. The Fe-containing spinel phase grows with cycling, leading to a decrease in available lattice oxygen.

3.3. Cyclic Stability of FeNi10Al OC

According to the OC performance shown in Figure 7, FeNi10Al demonstrates the optimal CH4 conversion and CO selectivity. A further increase in Ni content does not substantially enhance the oxygen capacity but leads to a higher oxygen carrier cost and lower CO selectivity. Consequently, the FeNi10Al OC was selected for 90 cycles of CLSR experiments to delve deeper into the cycling stability. The detailed gas flows of the FeNi10Al OC in the 10th, 50th, and 90th CH4 reduction and H2O oxidation stages are presented in Figure 10a,b. Additionally, the CH4 conversion, CO selectivity, oxygen capacity, and oxygen release rate during the CH4 reduction stage using FeNi10Al OC in long-term CLSR experiments are illustrated in Figure 10c. It can be inferred that the FeNi10Al OC exhibits robust stability during 90 CLSR cycles, with the CH4 conversion rate remaining at 96–98%, the CO selectivity remaining above 98%, the oxygen capacity before carbon deposition being about 0.9 mmol/gOC, and the average oxygen release rate being around 6.5 μmol/(s·gOC). The outlet gas distributions in the 10th, 50th, and 90th cycles are largely consistent.
Regarding the phase changes detailed in Figure 11a, Al2O3 and spinel without other phases were identified through cycling. Analysis of the particle size distribution and N2 adsorption and desorption curves (Figure 11b,c) of FeNi10Al after the 20th and 90th cycles indicate negligible changes in particle size and the specific surface area of the FeNi10Al OC across cycles. The sustained phase and physical strength could be the reason for the stability.
To summarize, the superior CLSR performance of the FeNi10Al oxygen carrier is attributed to suitable cooperation between the surface catalytic reaction and bulk oxygen supply, which is changed by the Fe/Ni ratio. As can be seen in Figure 6, a weaker catalytic reaction of FeNi20Al leads to low CH4 conversion, while a stronger bulk oxygen supply of FeNi7.5Al and FeNi5Al causes CO2 formation. Also, the sufficient amount of Al in FeNi10Al enhances the mechanical strength and high-temperature resistance. Therefore, Ni-Fe-Al interactions in FeNi10Al result in promising CO selectivity, oxygen release rates, and cycling stability.

3.4. Reaction Mechanism

The variation in surface elements in the FeNi10Al OC reflects the reaction mechanism of the oxygen carrier. XPS tests were conducted at five points, including complete H2O oxidation in the 1st cycle (point 1), CH4 reduction for 90 s in the 2nd cycle (point 2), CH4 reduction for 150 s in the 2nd cycle (point 3), H2O oxidation for 180 s in the 2nd cycle (point 4), and complete H2O oxidation in the 10th cycle (point 5), as shown in Figure 12.
The Fe 2p spectra are divided into 2p3/2, a 2p3/2 satellite peak, 2p1/2, and a 2p1/2 satellite peak. The 2p3/2 peak can be separated into three subpeaks at 713.3 eV (Fe1), 711.1 eV (Fe2), and 709.4 eV (Fe3). According to the existing report, Fe1 and Fe2 represent Fe3+ ions, and Fe3 represents Fe2+ ions [41]. Comparing points 1–3, the Fe2+ ratio continuously increases during the second CH4 reduction, also supported by the continuous attenuation of the satellite peaks. The Fe2+ content at point 4 is found to be higher than that at point 3, indicating that a deeper reduction can be achieved after the complete CH4 reduction. The Fe2+ content at point 4 is significantly higher than that at point 1. Therefore, the proportion of lattice oxygen during the process from Fe2+ to Fe3+ is relatively low. It can also be judged from points 1 and 5 that the Fe2+/Fe3+ ratio after the 10th complete oxidation is lower.
The Ni 2p spectra are divided into 2p3/2, a 2p3/2 satellite peak, 2p1/2, and a 2p1/2 satellite peak. The peak fitting of 2p3/2 yields four subpeaks at 856.6 eV (Ni1), 855.5 eV (Ni2), 854.4 eV (Ni3), and 852.2 eV (Ni4). Ni1, Ni2, Ni3, and Ni4 represent Ni2+ in NiAl2O4, Ni2+ in NiFe2O4, Ni2+ in NiO, and Ni0, respectively [42,43]. According to the calculated ratio, NiAl2O4 is transformed into Ni0 and NiO, and is then converted to Ni0 and NiFe2O4 during the reduction process. The formation of Ni0 at the beginning of the reduction accounts for the high CH4 conversion rate. During the H2O oxidation stage, Ni exists initially in the form of Ni0 and NiFe2O4, and finally in the form of NiAl2O4.
The O 1s spectra are divided into O1 (>531 eV) and O2 (<531 eV), representing chemisorbed oxygen and surface lattice oxygen [44]. As the reduction reaction progresses, the surface lattice oxygen decreases, and the peak position of the surface lattice oxygen shifts towards lower binding energies. During the oxidation process with H2O, the surface lattice oxygen is initially replenished. As the number of cycles increases, the content of chemisorbed oxygen increases after complete oxidation. Combined with the results of the cyclic experiments shown in Figure 7b, the increase in chemisorbed oxygen content is unfavorable for CH4 conversion.
According to the XPS results, the reaction mechanism can be scheduled as shown in Figure 13. Fe mainly undergoes transformations between Fe3+ and Fe2+/Fe0. Ni primarily undergoes transformations between Ni2+ in NiAl2O4 and Ni0. The reaction process of oxygen mainly involves the release and replenishment of lattice oxygen.

4. Conclusions

This work prepared a series of NiFeAlO oxygen carriers with Fe/Ni molar ratios of 20, 10, 7.5, and 5 and conducted CLSR cycles in a small-scale fluidized bed reactor. The influence of Ni-Fe-Al interactions on the physicochemical properties of the oxygen carriers was characterized using XRD, H2-TPR, CH4-TPR, and XPS. The main conclusions are as follows:
(1) In terms of the Ni-Fe-Al interactions, Ni promotes the growth of a spinel structure. After 10 cycles, only Al2O3 and spinel phases are observed in NiFeAlO oxygen carriers. The incorporation of Ni atoms into the spinel structure enhances both the catalytic sites and the available lattice oxygen.
(2) In CLSR cycles, a decrease in the Ni content enhances CO selectivity. The oxygen capacity remains relatively constant before carbon deposition for all oxygen carriers. In terms of the average oxygen release rate, an increase in the Ni content improves the lattice oxygen release rate. FeNi10Al is a promising oxygen carrier and exhibits good stability over 90 cycles, with the CH4 conversion rates maintained at 96–98% and CO selectivity above 98%. The oxygen capacity before carbon deposition is approximately 0.9 mmol/gOC, and the average oxygen release rate is around 6.5 μmol/(s·gOC).
(3) During CLSR cycles, Fe mainly undergoes transformations between Fe3+ and Fe2+/Fe0. Ni primarily undergoes transformations between Ni2+ in NiAl2O4 and Ni0. The oxygen reaction process mainly involves the release and replenishment of lattice oxygen.

Author Contributions

J.H.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing—Original Draft, Visualization. H.Y.: Methodology, Investigation. Y.W.: Writing—Review & Editing, Project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Scientific Research Foundation for Innovative Talents Introduction of Changzhou University [grant numbers ZMF23020049, ZMF23020052], the Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Jiangsu Province of China [grant numbers 24KJB480001] and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [grant numbers BK20240971].

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, J.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, X.; Xia, W.; Huang, A.; Zong, J.; Wang, Z.; Qian, B.; Donat, F. One-Step Synthesis of CaO/CuO Composite Pellets for Enhanced CO2 Capture Performance in a Combined Ca/Cu Looping Process via a Facile Gel-Casting Technique. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 328, 125057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, J.; Duan, L.; Sun, Z. Review on the Development of Sorbents for Calcium Looping. Energy Fuels 2020, 34, 7806–7836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, Z.; Zhong, M.; Wang, C.; Cai, Y.; Xiao, B.; Xu, T.; Wang, X. Chemical Looping Reforming with Water Splitting (CLRWS) for Syngas and Hydrogen Coproduction Using the Ternary Metal-Oxides (Ca-Fe-Cu–O) as Oxygen Carriers. Fuel 2024, 368, 131640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhong, M.; Xu, T.; Wang, C.; Teng, Y.; Cai, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Xiao, B.; Wang, X. Utilizing High Entropy Oxide (Ni0.2Co0.2Ca0.2Cu0.2Mg0.2)Fe2O4 in Chemical Looping Process for Highly Efficient and Stable Hydrogen Production. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 487, 150521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, C.; Liu, T.; Xiao, R.; Zeng, D. High-Purity Hydrogen Obtained via a Plasma-Assisted Chemical Looping Process Using Perovskite-Supported Iron Oxides as Oxygen Carriers. Energy Fuels 2023, 37, 14141–14149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Long, Y.; Yang, K.; Gu, Z.; Lin, S.; Li, D.; Zhu, X.; Wang, H.; Li, K. Hydrogen Generation from Water Splitting over Polyfunctional Perovskite Oxygen Carriers by Using Coke Oven Gas as Reducing Agent. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2022, 301, 120778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wen, Z.; Duan, N.; Zhang, R.; Li, H.; Wu, Y.; Sun, Z.; Sun, Z. Machine Learning-Based Deoxidizer Screening for Intensified Hydrogen Production from Steam Splitting. J. Cleaner Prod. 2024, 449, 141779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Du, J.; Wu, M.; Chen, S.; Xiang, W. Interactions of Mg-Fe-Al-O Oxygen Carriers with Rare Earth Dopants (Ce, Y, Sm, La, and Pr) in Chemical Looping Steam Reforming. Fuel 2024, 361, 130606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sayyed, S.Z.; Vaidya, P.D. Chemical Looping-Steam Reforming of Biogas and Methane over Lanthanum-Based Perovskite for Improved Production of Syngas and Hydrogen. Energy Fuels 2023, 37, 19082–19091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. He, J.; Yang, Q.; Song, Z.; Chang, W.; Huang, C.; Zhu, Y.; Ma, X.; Wang, X. Improving the Carbon Resistance of Iron-Based Oxygen Carrier for Hydrogen Production via Chemical Looping Steam Methane Reforming: A Review. Fuel 2023, 351, 128864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Song, D.; Long, T.; Li, C.; Li, Y.; Fan, M.; Lu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, H.; Lin, Y.; Huang, Z.; et al. Micro-Structure Change and Crystal-Structure Modulated of Oxygen Carriers for Chemical Looping: Controlling Local Chemical Environment of Lattice Oxygen. Fuel 2024, 364, 131087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sun, Z.; Russell, C.K.; Whitty, K.J.; Eddings, E.G.; Dai, J.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, M.; Sun, Z. Chemical Looping-Based Energy Transformation via Lattice Oxygen Modulated Selective Oxidation. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2023, 96, 101045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, T.; Luo, R.; Shi, X.; Zhang, X.; Wu, S.; Pei, C.; Zhao, Z.-J.; Gong, J. Achieving Surface and Bulk Rate Matching for Chemical Looping Partial Oxidation of Methane by Modulating Oxygen Transport. Sci. China Mater. 2024, 67, 1217–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, F.; Liu, J.; Yang, Y. Review on the Theoretical Understanding of Oxygen Carrier Development for Chemical-Looping Technologies. Energy Fuels 2022, 36, 9373–9384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, S.; Ren, Z.; Hu, Q.; Yao, D.; Yang, H. Upcycling Plastic Waste into Syngas by Staged Chemical Looping Gasification with Modified Fe-Based Oxygen Carriers. Appl. Energy 2024, 353, 122105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, F.; Chen, S.; Duan, L.; Xiang, W. Carbon Dioxide Capture and Hydrogen Production with a Chemical Looping Concept: A Review on Oxygen Carrier and Reactor. Energy Fuels 2023, 37, 16245–16266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhao, L.; Dou, B.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Z. Oxygen Carriers for Chemical-Looping Water Splitting to Hydrogen Production: A Critical Review. Carbon Capture Sci. Technol. 2021, 1, 100006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tian, M.; Wang, C.; Han, Y.; Wang, X. Recent Advances of Oxygen Carriers for Chemical Looping Reforming of Methane. ChemCatChem 2021, 13, 1615–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, D.; Xu, R.; Gu, Z.; Zhu, X.; Qing, S.; Li, K. Chemical-Looping Conversion of Methane: A Review. Energy Technol. 2020, 8, 1900925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, J.; Yang, T.; Rao, Q.; Gai, Z.; Li, P.; Shen, Y.; Liu, M.; Pan, Y.; Jin, H. Enhancement of Fe/Ce Oxygen Carrier Performance in Chemical Looping Dry Reforming of Methane. Fuel 2024, 366, 131344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gao, Z.; Wu, D.; Barakat, M.; Sun, L.; Gong, F.; Xiao, R. Improving the Reactivity and Stability of Fe2O3/Al2O3 in Chemical Looping Process by Optimizing the Al2O3 Precursor. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2024, 63, 3092–3103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Deng, J.; Zhang, Y.; Han, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Gong, X.; Chen, Y. Characterization and Performance of Sr and Co Doped Fe2O3–LaFeO3 Quaternary Perovskite Composite Oxides for Efficient Realization of CH4 Chemical Looping Conversion. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 3265–3278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hu, J.; Chen, S.; Xiang, W. Ni, Co and Cu-Promoted Iron-Based Oxygen Carriers in Methane-Fueled Chemical Looping Hydrogen Generation Process. Fuel Process. Technol. 2021, 221, 106917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, X.; Zhang, Z.; Lin, Y.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Xiong, Y.; Yi, Q.; Yan, L.; Li, J.; Deng, L.; et al. Effect of Nickel-Modified Hematite on the Conversion of Volatile and Char during Chemical Looping Gasification of Wood-Based Panel Waste. Energy Fuels 2024, 38, 8842–8852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Samprón, I.; García-Labiano, F.; Izquierdo, M.T.; de Diego, L.F. Understanding the Structural Changes on Fe2O3/Al2O3 Oxygen Carriers under Chemical Looping Gasification Conditions. Fuel 2024, 355, 129326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kang, Y.; Tian, M.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Huang, C.; Zhu, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, G.; Wang, X. Silica Modified Alumina as Supports of Fe2O3 with High Performance in Chemical Looping Combustion of Methane. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 12884–12892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, W. Controlling Lattice Oxygen Activity of Oxygen Carrier Materials by Design: A Review and Perspective. React. Chem. Eng. 2021, 6, 1527–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rao, Q.; Zhang, J.; Yang, T.; Li, Y.; Gai, Z.; Li, P.; Wang, X.; Pan, Y.; Jin, H. A Nickel-Modified Perovskite-Supported Iron Oxide Oxygen Carrier for Chemical Looping Dry Reforming of Methane for Syngas Production. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 485, 150033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, R.; Liu, G.; Huo, C.; Liu, J.; Zhang, B.; Yang, B.; Tian, X.; Wu, Z. Tailoring Catalytic and Oxygen Release Capability in LaFe1–xNixO3 to Intensify Chemical Looping Reactions at Medium Temperatures. ACS Catal. 2024, 14, 7771–7787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liang, S.; Liao, Y.; Yang, H.; Zhang, T.; Ma, X. Inhibition Strategies for Phase Separation of Iron-Based Oxygen Carriers in Chemical Looping Gasification- Enhanced Oxygen Transport Efficiency through Oxide-Support Interactions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 343, 127173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cui, D.; Qiu, Y.; Lv, Y.; Li, M.; Zhang, S.; Tippayawong, N.; Zeng, D.; Xiao, R. A High-Performance Oxygen Carrier with High Oxygen Transport Capacity and Redox Stability for Chemical Looping Combustion. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 202, 112209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kim, Y.; Lim, H.S.; Lee, M.; Kim, M.; Kang, D.; Lee, J.W. Enhanced Morphological Preservation and Redox Activity in Al-Incorporated NiFe2O4 for Chemical Looping Hydrogen Production. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 14800–14810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chang, W.; Gao, Y.; He, J.; Xia, X.; Huang, C.; Hu, Y.; Xu, W.; Jiang, B.; Han, Y.; Zhu, Y.; et al. Asymmetric Coordination Activated Lattice Oxygen in Perovskite Ferrites for Selective Anaerobic Oxidation of Methane. J. Mater. Chem. A 2023, 11, 4651–4660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fan, Q.; Huang, C.; Xi, S.; Yan, Y.; Huang, J.; Saqline, S.; Tao, L.; Dai, Y.; Borgna, A.; Wang, X.; et al. Breaking the Stoichiometric Limit in Oxygen-Carrying Capacity of Fe-Based Oxygen Carriers for Chemical Looping Combustion Using the Mg-Fe-O Solid Solution System. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 7242–7252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, X.; Pei, C.; Chang, X.; Chen, S.; Liu, R.; Zhao, Z.-J.; Mu, R.; Gong, J. FeO6 Octahedral Distortion Activates Lattice Oxygen in Perovskite Ferrite for Methane Partial Oxidation Coupled with CO2 Splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 11540–11549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xia, X.; Chang, W.; Cheng, S.; Huang, C.; Hu, Y.; Xu, W.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, B.; Sun, Z.; Zhu, Y.; et al. Oxygen Activity Tuning via FeO6 Octahedral Tilting in Perovskite Ferrites for Chemical Looping Dry Reforming of Methane. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 7326–7335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhao, Q.; Yan, Z.; Chen, C.; Chen, J. Spinels: Controlled Preparation, Oxygen Reduction/Evolution Reaction Application, and Beyond. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 10121–10211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Benrabaa, R.; Trentesaux, M.; Roussel, P.; Rubbens, A.; Vannier, R.-N.; Löfberg, A. NiAlxFe2−xO4 Mixed Oxide Catalysts for Methane Reforming with CO2: Effect of Al vs Fe Contents and Precursor Salts. J. CO2 Util. 2023, 67, 102319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hu, J.; Chen, S.; Xiang, W. Sintering and Agglomeration of Fe2O3-MgAl2O4 Oxygen Carriers with Different Fe2O3 Loadings in Chemical Looping Processes. Fuel 2020, 265, 116983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhu, M.; Chen, S.; Soomro, A.; Hu, J.; Sun, Z.; Ma, S.; Xiang, W. Effects of Supports on Reduction Activity and Carbon Deposition of Iron Oxide for Methane Chemical Looping Hydrogen Generation. Appl. Energy 2018, 225, 912–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhu, Y.; Jin, N.; Liu, R.; Sun, X.; Bai, L.; Tian, H.; Ma, X.; Wang, X. Bimetallic BaFe2MAl9O19 (M = Mn, Ni, and Co) Hexaaluminates as Oxygen Carriers for Chemical Looping Dry Reforming of Methane. Appl. Energy 2020, 258, 114070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. McIntyre, N.S.; Cook, M.G. X-Ray Photoelectron Studies on Some Oxides and Hydroxides of Cobalt, Nickel, and Copper. Anal. Chem. 1975, 47, 2208–2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Salvati, L.; Makovsky, L.E.; Stencel, J.M.; Brown, F.R.; Hercules, D.M. Surface Spectroscopic Study of Tungsten-Alumina Catalysts Using x-Ray Photoelectron, Ion Scattering, and Raman Spectroscopies. J. Phys. Chem. 1981, 85, 3700–3707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Huang, Z.; Gao, N.; Lin, Y.; Wei, G.; Zhao, K.; Zheng, A.; Zhao, Z.; Yuan, H.; Li, H. Exploring the Migration and Transformation of Lattice Oxygen during Chemical Looping with NiFe2O4 Oxygen Carrier. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 429, 132064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic of chemical looping steam reforming (CLSR) of methane process.
Figure 1. Schematic of chemical looping steam reforming (CLSR) of methane process.
Fuels 06 00076 g001
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns of oxygen carriers after calcination and (b) enlarged part from 35.5° to 38.0°.
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns of oxygen carriers after calcination and (b) enlarged part from 35.5° to 38.0°.
Fuels 06 00076 g002
Figure 3. H2-TPR curves of oxygen carriers after calcination. (The arrow indicates the following order: FeNi20Al, FeNi10Al, FeNi7.5Al and FeNi5Al).
Figure 3. H2-TPR curves of oxygen carriers after calcination. (The arrow indicates the following order: FeNi20Al, FeNi10Al, FeNi7.5Al and FeNi5Al).
Fuels 06 00076 g003
Figure 4. Oxygen vacancy formation energy (a), and lattice models of (NiFe)Al2O4 (b), (NiFe)(FeAl)2O4_1 (c), and (NiFe)(FeAl)2O4_2 (d). (Colors in the (bd): brown—Ni atoms, blue—Fe atoms, grey—Al atoms, red—O atoms).
Figure 4. Oxygen vacancy formation energy (a), and lattice models of (NiFe)Al2O4 (b), (NiFe)(FeAl)2O4_1 (c), and (NiFe)(FeAl)2O4_2 (d). (Colors in the (bd): brown—Ni atoms, blue—Fe atoms, grey—Al atoms, red—O atoms).
Fuels 06 00076 g004
Figure 5. CH4-TPSR curves of (a) FeNi20Al, (b) FeNi10Al, (c) FeNi7.5Al, and (d) FeNi5Al oxygen carriers.
Figure 5. CH4-TPSR curves of (a) FeNi20Al, (b) FeNi10Al, (c) FeNi7.5Al, and (d) FeNi5Al oxygen carriers.
Fuels 06 00076 g005
Figure 6. Flow rates of CO2, CO, H2, and CH4 during the 2nd to 10th CH4 reduction stages of (a) FeNi20Al, (b) FeNi10Al, (c) FeNi7.5Al, and (d) FeNi5Al (deeper colors indicate more cycles).
Figure 6. Flow rates of CO2, CO, H2, and CH4 during the 2nd to 10th CH4 reduction stages of (a) FeNi20Al, (b) FeNi10Al, (c) FeNi7.5Al, and (d) FeNi5Al (deeper colors indicate more cycles).
Fuels 06 00076 g006
Figure 7. CH4 conversion, CO selectivity, oxygen capacity, and rate of oxygen release for (a) FeNi20Al, (b) FeNi10Al, (c) FeNi7.5Al, and (d) FeNi5Al during CH4 reduction stage before carbon deposition.
Figure 7. CH4 conversion, CO selectivity, oxygen capacity, and rate of oxygen release for (a) FeNi20Al, (b) FeNi10Al, (c) FeNi7.5Al, and (d) FeNi5Al during CH4 reduction stage before carbon deposition.
Fuels 06 00076 g007
Figure 8. (a) XRD patterns of oxygen carriers after the 10th cycle and (b) enlarged part from 35.5° to 38.0°.
Figure 8. (a) XRD patterns of oxygen carriers after the 10th cycle and (b) enlarged part from 35.5° to 38.0°.
Fuels 06 00076 g008
Figure 9. H2-TPR curves of oxygen carriers after the 10th cycle. (The arrow indicates the following order: FeNi20Al, FeNi10Al, FeNi7.5Al and FeNi5Al).
Figure 9. H2-TPR curves of oxygen carriers after the 10th cycle. (The arrow indicates the following order: FeNi20Al, FeNi10Al, FeNi7.5Al and FeNi5Al).
Fuels 06 00076 g009
Figure 10. (a) Flow rates during the 10th, 50th, and 90th reduction stages. (b) Flow rates during the 10th, 50th, and 90th oxidation stages. (c) CH4 conversion, CO selectivity, oxygen capacity, and rate of oxygen release during the CH4 reduction stage when using FeNi10Al OC.
Figure 10. (a) Flow rates during the 10th, 50th, and 90th reduction stages. (b) Flow rates during the 10th, 50th, and 90th oxidation stages. (c) CH4 conversion, CO selectivity, oxygen capacity, and rate of oxygen release during the CH4 reduction stage when using FeNi10Al OC.
Fuels 06 00076 g010
Figure 11. (a) XRD pattern, (b) N2 adsorption and desorption curves, and (c) particle size distribution of FeNi10Al oxygen carriers after the 20th and 90th cycles.
Figure 11. (a) XRD pattern, (b) N2 adsorption and desorption curves, and (c) particle size distribution of FeNi10Al oxygen carriers after the 20th and 90th cycles.
Fuels 06 00076 g011
Figure 12. XPS spectra of oxygen carriers: (a) Fe 2p (colors: blue—Fe2+, pink and purple—Fe3+), (b) Ni 2p (colors: blue—Ni2+ in NiAl2O4, yellow—Ni2+ in NiFe2O4, purple—Ni2+ in NiO, and pink—Ni0), and (c) O 1s (colors: pink—chemisorbed oxygen and blue—surface lattice oxygen). (d) Calculated ratios of different peaks.
Figure 12. XPS spectra of oxygen carriers: (a) Fe 2p (colors: blue—Fe2+, pink and purple—Fe3+), (b) Ni 2p (colors: blue—Ni2+ in NiAl2O4, yellow—Ni2+ in NiFe2O4, purple—Ni2+ in NiO, and pink—Ni0), and (c) O 1s (colors: pink—chemisorbed oxygen and blue—surface lattice oxygen). (d) Calculated ratios of different peaks.
Fuels 06 00076 g012
Figure 13. Reaction mechanism of oxygen carriers.
Figure 13. Reaction mechanism of oxygen carriers.
Fuels 06 00076 g013
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, J.; Yu, H.; Wang, Y. Tuning Chemical Looping Steam Reforming of Methane Performance via Ni-Fe-Al Interaction in Spinel Ferrites. Fuels 2025, 6, 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/fuels6040076

AMA Style

Hu J, Yu H, Wang Y. Tuning Chemical Looping Steam Reforming of Methane Performance via Ni-Fe-Al Interaction in Spinel Ferrites. Fuels. 2025; 6(4):76. https://doi.org/10.3390/fuels6040076

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Jun, Hongyang Yu, and Yanan Wang. 2025. "Tuning Chemical Looping Steam Reforming of Methane Performance via Ni-Fe-Al Interaction in Spinel Ferrites" Fuels 6, no. 4: 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/fuels6040076

APA Style

Hu, J., Yu, H., & Wang, Y. (2025). Tuning Chemical Looping Steam Reforming of Methane Performance via Ni-Fe-Al Interaction in Spinel Ferrites. Fuels, 6(4), 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/fuels6040076

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop