Previous Article in Journal
YOLO with Multi-Module Fusion for Prohibited Item Detection in X-Ray Security Images
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Probabilistic and Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Pile Unit Base Resistance in Soft Soil

by
Kristina Božić-Tomić
1,
Miljan Kovačević
2,*,
Ljubo Marković
2 and
Suzana Koprivica
3
1
Department of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Academy of Technical and Art Applied Studies Belgrade, Hajduk Stankova 2, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
2
Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Pristina with Temporary Headquarters in Kosovska Mitrovica, Knjaza Milosa 7, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia
3
Faculty of Construction Management, Union–Nikola Tesla University, Cara Dušana 62–64, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Modelling 2026, 7(5), 179; https://doi.org/10.3390/modelling7050179
Submission received: 24 July 2026 / Revised: 19 August 2026 / Accepted: 22 August 2026 / Published: 26 August 2026

Abstract

Accurate prediction of pile base resistance is essential for the safe and economical design of deep foundations, particularly in soft soils where load-transfer mechanisms are highly nonlinear and uncertain. This study develops a comparative, probabilistic, and interpretable machine learning framework for predicting pile unit base resistance using five input variables: applied load, settlement, effective pile length, axial stiffness, and SPT value. A Gaussian Process Regression model with an automatic relevance determination (ARD) Exponential kernel achieved the best performance, with RMSE = 262.11 kPa, R2 = 0.943 on an independent test set, and 95% prediction intervals with 96.46% coverage. Beyond record-level evaluation, a leave-one-pile-out validation (the first grouped validation applied to this database) showed harder generalization to entirely unseen piles, driven mainly by a per-pile level offset rather than shape mismatch (within-pile correlation = 0.975). A sequential next-stage scheme, calibrating this level from a pile’s early loading stages, then predicted its remaining segments with consistently strong agreement (Willmott’s d = 0.76–0.83), supporting practical extension of partial load tests. Interpretability was assessed using ARD, SHAP, permutation/ablation importance, and partial dependence/accumulated local effects analysis, identifying settlement as the dominant predictor. The framework combines accuracy, calibrated uncertainty, interpretability, and validated segment-level extrapolation for reliability-oriented pile assessment.
Keywords: pile foundations; base resistance; Gaussian Process Regression; uncertainty quantification; SHAP; interpretability; soft soil; SPT pile foundations; base resistance; Gaussian Process Regression; uncertainty quantification; SHAP; interpretability; soft soil; SPT

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Božić-Tomić, K.; Kovačević, M.; Marković, L.; Koprivica, S. Probabilistic and Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Pile Unit Base Resistance in Soft Soil. Modelling 2026, 7, 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/modelling7050179

AMA Style

Božić-Tomić K, Kovačević M, Marković L, Koprivica S. Probabilistic and Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Pile Unit Base Resistance in Soft Soil. Modelling. 2026; 7(5):179. https://doi.org/10.3390/modelling7050179

Chicago/Turabian Style

Božić-Tomić, Kristina, Miljan Kovačević, Ljubo Marković, and Suzana Koprivica. 2026. "Probabilistic and Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Pile Unit Base Resistance in Soft Soil" Modelling 7, no. 5: 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/modelling7050179

APA Style

Božić-Tomić, K., Kovačević, M., Marković, L., & Koprivica, S. (2026). Probabilistic and Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Predicting Pile Unit Base Resistance in Soft Soil. Modelling, 7(5), 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/modelling7050179

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop