Laparoscopic Management of Hemoperitoneum Due to a Cornual Pregnancy After an Ipsilateral Tubal Pregnancy: A Case Report
Abstract
1. Introduction
- -
- Previous ectopic pregnancies
- -
- Tubal surgeries, such as salpingectomy or tubal ligation
- -
- Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs)
- -
- Uterine anomalies, such as septate or bicornuate uterus
- -
- Pelvic inflammatory disease
- -
- Use of intrauterine devices (IUDs)
2. Case Presentation
3. Discussion
3.1. Epidemiology and Clinical Significance
3.2. Anatomical and Embryological Considerations
3.3. Diagnostic Approaches
3.4. Management Strategies
- -
- Cornuostomy: Incision and evacuation while preserving the uterus.
- -
- Cornual resection: Removal of the affected segment, often necessary in advanced gestation or rupture.
- -
- Hysterectomy: Reserved for uncontrolled hemorrhage or completed parity.
- -
- Robotic-assisted laparoscopy: Offers precision, though its use is limited by cost and availability.
3.5. Minimally Invasive Surgery
3.6. Reproductive Outcomes and Follow-Up
3.7. Significance of This Case
3.8. Future Directions
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Yang, E.; Liu, Y.-L. Interstitial and Cornual Ectopic Pregnancy: A Review of the Management Options. Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2023, 50, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, C.; Patel, H. Ruptured Cornual Ectopic Pregnancy: A Rare and Challenging Obstetric Emergency. Cureus 2023, 15, e47842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Santos, L.T.R.; Oliveira, S.C.d.S.; Rocha, L.G.A.; Sousa, N.D.S.; Figueiredo, R.d.S. Interstitial Pregnancy: Case report of atypical ectopic pregnancy. Cureus 2020, 12, e8081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cordeiro, D.E.F.; Alves, J.A.G.; Feitosa, F.E.L. Interstitial and angular pregnancies: Case reports and differential diagnosis. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2018, 44, 1999–2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sherer, D.M.; Roach, C.; Gerren, A.; Granderson, F.; Kheyman, M.; Dalloul, M. Sonographic diagnosis of an interstitial pregnancy in an asymptomatic patient at 7 weeks’ gestation. Radiol. Case Rep. 2022, 17, 4850–4854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaetani, M.; Di Gennaro, D.; Vimercati, A.; Vitagliano, A.; Dellino, M.; Malvasi, A.; Loizzi, V.; Pinto, V.; Cicinelli, E.; Di Naro, E.; et al. Cornual Pregnancy. Gynecol. Minim. Invasive Ther. 2023, 12, 130–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Moawad, N.S.; Mahajan, S.T.; Moniz, M.H.; Taylor, S.E.; Hurd, W.W. Current diagnosis and treatment of interstitial pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010, 202, 15–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anthony, S.; Selma, N. Laparoscopic management of 4 cases of recurrent cornual ectopic pregnancy and review of literature. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2011, 18, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faraj, R.; Steel, M. Management of cornual (interstitial) pregnancy. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2007, 9, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ectopic Pregnancy and Miscarriage: Diagnosis and Initial Management; National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE): London, UK, 2023. [PubMed]
- Liao, C.Y.; Tse, J.; Sung, S.Y.; Chen, S.H.; Tsui, W.H. Cornual wedge resection for interstitial pregnancy and postoperative outcome. Aust. New Zealand J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2017, 57, 342–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grant, A.; Murji, A.; Atri, M. Can the presence of a surrounding endometrium differentiate eccentrically located intrauterine pregnancy from interstitial ectopic pregnancy? J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2017, 39, 627–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parker, V.L.; Srinivas, M. Non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2016, 294, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durand, Y.G.; Capoccia-Brugger, R.; Vial, Y.; Balaya, V. Diagnostic dilemma between angular and interstitial ectopic pregnancy: 3D ultrasound features. J. Ultrasound 2022, 25, 989–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mokashi, T.; Dutta, S.; Das, S. VP59.31: Interstitial pregnancy a diagnostic dilemma with favourable surgical outcomes. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 56, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ackerman, T.E.; Levi, C.S.; Dashefsky, S.M.; Holt, S.C.; Lindsay, D.J. Interstitial line: Sonographic finding in interstitial (cornual) ectopic pregnancy. Radiology 1993, 189, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakatsuka, E.; Mimura, K.; Endo, M.; Miyake, T.; Kakigano, A.; Matsuzaki, S.; Kawanishi, Y.; Tomimatsu, T.; Kimura, T. Conservative management for adherent placenta after live birth in angular or interstitial pregnancies: A new entity “angular placenta attachment”. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 59, 975–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, T.Y.; Chueh, H.Y.; Chang, S.D.; Yang, C.Y. Interstitial ectopic pregnancy: A more confident diagnosis with three-dimensional sonography. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 60, 173–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gao, F.; Sun, M.H.; Fu, L. The role of three-dimensional MRI in the differentiation between angular pregnancy and interstitial pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022, 22, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanoodi, M.; Mittal, M. Methotrexate. 2024 Dec 11. In StatPearls [Internet]; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Tasgoz, F.N.; Temur, M.; Dundar, B.; Kartal, E.; Ustunyurt, E. The role of day 0 and day 4 β-human chorionic gonadotropin values and initial ultrasound findings in predicting the success of methotrexate treatment in ectopic pregnancy. Ginekol. Pol. 2020, 91, 389–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhagavath, B.; Lindheim, S.R. Surgical management of interstitial (cornual) ectopic pregnancy: Many ways to peel an orange! Fertil. Steril. 2021, 115, 1193–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casadio, P.; Arena, A.; Verrelli, L.; Ambrosio, M.; Fabbri, M.; Giovannico, K.; Magnarelli, G.; Seracchioli, R. Methotrexate injection for interstitial pregnancy: Hysteroscopic conservative mini-invasive approach. Facts Views Vis. Obgyn 2021, 13, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biffi, A.; Damiani, G.R.; Pellegri, A.M.; Quartucci, A.; Di Gennaro, D.; Boca, G.D. Cornual pregnancy. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2022, 29, 327–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Min, C.J.; Cameo, T.; Ross, W.T.; Bardawil, E.C.; Biest, S.W.; de Souza, K.M. Vasopressin Injection Purse-String Ectopic Resection technique for laparoscopic management of cornual ectopic pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2023, 229, 340–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kaur, A.; Saha, P.K.; Meena, M.; Tvinwal, S. Surgical Management of Interstitial Ectopic Pregnancy Using Intramyometrial Vasopressin and Cornuostomy. Cureus 2025, 17, e77125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Tinelli, R.; Stomati, M.; Surico, D.; Cicinelli, E.; Trojano, G.; Angioni, S. Laparoscopic management of a cornual pregnancy following failed methotrexate treatment: Case report and review of literature. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2020, 36, 743–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marchand, G.; Taher Masoud, A.; Sainz, K.; Azadi, A.; Ware, K.; Vallejo, J.; Anderson, S.; King, A.; Osborn, A.; Ruther, S.; et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparotomy compared with laparoscopic management of interstitial pregnancy. Facts Views Vis. Obgyn 2021, 12, 299–308. [Google Scholar]
Risk Factor | Mechanism/Explanation |
---|---|
Previous ectopic pregnancy | History of tubal pathology or damage increases likelihood of abnormal implantation |
Tubal surgeries (salpingectomy, ligation) | Altered tubal anatomy or scarring may predispose to interstitial implantation |
Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) | Embryo transfer may increase risk of implantation in cornual region |
Uterine anomalies (septate, bicornuate) | Abnormal uterine shape can divert implantation toward cornua |
Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) | Tubal scarring and adhesions may impede normal transport of embryo |
Intrauterine device (IUD) use | Prevents intrauterine implantation, occasionally leading to ectopic implantation elsewhere |
Approach | Indications (Eligibility) | Advantages | Limitations/Risks |
---|---|---|---|
Expectant | Asymptomatic Clinically stable Ectopic mass < 35 mm No visible fetal heartbeat Serum β-hCG < 1000 IU/L and declining Reliable follow-up possible | Avoids intervention Preserves fertility No surgical or drug-related complications | Requires close monitoring Risk of rupture if condition changes Not suitable if follow-up unreliable |
Medical (Methotrexate) | Hemodynamically stable Ectopic mass < 35 mm No visible fetal heartbeat Serum β-hCG < 1500 IU/L (single-dose protocol) Patient compliant with follow-up | Minimally invasive Avoids surgery Fertility preservation | Side effects of methotrexate (e.g., stomatitis, abdominal pain, liver toxicity) Risk of treatment failure and rupture Requires serial β-hCG monitoring |
Surgical | Hemodynamically unstable Severe pain or hemoperitoneum Ectopic mass ≥ 35 mm Visible fetal cardiac activity Serum β-hCG ≥ 5000 IU/L Contraindication to methotrexate Patient preference | Definitive treatment Immediate resolution Appropriate in emergencies | Risks of anesthesia and surgery Possible loss of tube/uterine integrity Adhesion formation Impact on future fertility depending on procedure |
Surgical Approach | Indications | Advantages | Limitations/Risks | Fertility Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cornuostomy (incision + evacuation, uterine preservation) | Hemodynamically stable patients, small unruptured CP, fertility desired | Minimally invasive, preserves uterine architecture, shorter recovery, lower blood loss compared to wedge resection, fertility preservation. | Risk of persistent trophoblastic tissue requiring follow-up, possible uterine rupture in future pregnancies if myometrial repair inadequate. | Generally favorable, but increased monitoring required |
Cornual Resection (wedge resection of cornual segment) | Larger CP, ruptured CP with significant myometrial involvement | More radical excision, lowers risk of persistent trophoblastic tissue, reduces recurrence. | Higher intraoperative blood loss, larger myometrial defect, increased adhesion formation, greater risk of uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancies. | High rates of preserved fertility if myometrium is adequately repaired |
Laparoscopy (preferred minimally invasive route) | Hemodynamically stable patients, availability of expertise and equipment | Minimally invasive, reduced morbidity, faster recovery, lower adhesion risk, fertility preservation, suitability for enucleation or wedge resection. | Requires advanced surgical expertise, limited availability in unstable patients with massive hemorrhage. | High rates of preserved fertility if myometrium is adequately repaired |
Laparotomy | Hemodynamically unstable patients, massive hemoperitoneum, limited resources | Faster access in unstable patients, more direct control of hemorrhage, feasible in resource-limited settings. | Higher morbidity, more postoperative pain, prolonged recovery, adhesion risk. | Fertility often preserved but depends on extent of uterine damage |
Hysterectomy | Life-threatening hemorrhage, uncontrolled bleeding, completed family or no desire for fertility | Definitive treatment, eliminates recurrence risk, lifesaving in uncontrolled bleeding. | Complete loss of fertility, significant morbidity. | Not applicable |
Robotic-assisted surgery (in select centers) | Complex CP cases, availability of robotic platform | Enhanced dexterity, precision suturing, excellent visualization, fertility preservation comparable to laparoscopy. | High cost, limited availability, requires dedicated training. | Fertility preservation comparable to laparoscopy, but limited data |
Interventional radiology (uterine artery embolization / temporary arterial balloon occlusion) | Anticipated high bleeding risk; desire for uterine preservation; adjunct to conservative surgery or when immediate surgical hemostasis is challenging | Hemorrhage control; may reduce transfusions; can facilitate minimally invasive, uterus-sparing repair | Limited evidence base; requires IR expertise and coordination; potential impact on future fertility unclear | Insufficient high-quality data; cautious counseling advised |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Tinelli, R.; Savasta, F.; Angioni, S.; Bogani, G.; Leo, L.; Messina, A.; Libretti, A. Laparoscopic Management of Hemoperitoneum Due to a Cornual Pregnancy After an Ipsilateral Tubal Pregnancy: A Case Report. Reprod. Med. 2025, 6, 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed6040027
Tinelli R, Savasta F, Angioni S, Bogani G, Leo L, Messina A, Libretti A. Laparoscopic Management of Hemoperitoneum Due to a Cornual Pregnancy After an Ipsilateral Tubal Pregnancy: A Case Report. Reproductive Medicine. 2025; 6(4):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed6040027
Chicago/Turabian StyleTinelli, Raffaele, Federica Savasta, Stefano Angioni, Giorgio Bogani, Livio Leo, Alessandro Messina, and Alessandro Libretti. 2025. "Laparoscopic Management of Hemoperitoneum Due to a Cornual Pregnancy After an Ipsilateral Tubal Pregnancy: A Case Report" Reproductive Medicine 6, no. 4: 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed6040027
APA StyleTinelli, R., Savasta, F., Angioni, S., Bogani, G., Leo, L., Messina, A., & Libretti, A. (2025). Laparoscopic Management of Hemoperitoneum Due to a Cornual Pregnancy After an Ipsilateral Tubal Pregnancy: A Case Report. Reproductive Medicine, 6(4), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed6040027