Previous Article in Journal
Structure–Optical Properties and Sustainability Assessment of Carbon Dots Derived from Laurus nobilis Leaves
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube Application Alters Stomatal Behavior in Boreal Shrubs Under Drought Conditions

1
Centre for Boreal Research, Northern Alberta Institute of Technology, Peace River, AB T8S 1R2, Canada
2
Faculty of Natural Resources Management, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
3
Department of Biology, Biotron Experimental Climate Change Research Centre, Faculty of Science, Western University, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Research Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan.
Current address: Natural Resources and Forestry Program, College of New Caledonia, Prince George, BC V2N 1P8, Canada.
Appl. Nano 2025, 6(4), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/applnano6040020
Submission received: 28 August 2025 / Revised: 17 September 2025 / Accepted: 18 September 2025 / Published: 28 September 2025

Abstract

Seedling establishment on reclaimed boreal sites is frequently constrained by drought and other abiotic stresses. Carbon nanomaterials have been shown to influence stress physiology in crops, but their effects on native boreal species are poorly understood. We tested whether carboxylic acid-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) alter drought responses in three shrubs widely used in reclamation: Shepherdia canadensis (L.) Nutt, Cornus sericea L., and Viburnum edule. Seedlings received two irrigations with MWCNTs suspensions (0 (control), 10, or 30 mg L−1) before exposure to well-watered or drought conditions in a greenhouse. Drought reduced photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and transpiration and increased Ci/Ca across species, consistent with declining leaf water potential. MWCNTs did not broadly modify these responses, but the highest concentration (30 mg L−1) further suppressed stomatal conductance in C. sericea and V. edule during mid- to late drought. S. canadensis showed little responsiveness. These effects suggest that MWCNT-associated stomatal closure may limit water loss under stress but also constrain CO2 uptake, offering no clear photosynthetic benefit. MWCNT impacts were subtle, species- and dose-dependent, and centered on stomatal regulation. Application in reclamation should therefore be approached cautiously, balancing potential water-saving benefits against possible reductions in carbon assimilation and growth.

1. Introduction

Reclamation processes following boreal resource development, such as oil sands mining, typically involve the reconstruction of soils using a substrate layer (e.g., tailings sand or overburden) and a cover soil layer (salvaged peat, mineral soils, or upland surface and mineral soils), which serves as the medium for vegetation growth [1,2]. However, planted seedlings face significant challenges in reclaimed soil due to abiotic stressors, including low nutrient availability, high pH, salinity, and drought conditions [3], which contribute to slow growth and transplant shock [3,4]. Thus, enhancing seedling morpho-physiological traits during nursery production is critical for improving drought resilience and increasing survival in these challenging environments.
Reclaimed sites in boreal regions are highly prone to water deficits due to the physical limitations of reconstructed soils and harsh microclimatic conditions. Substrate materials, such as tailings sand, typically have a low water-holding capacity and high drainage, whereas overburden may retain water but often lacks sufficient aeration [5]. In addition, poor soil–root contact and limited root permeability following transplanting further restrict water uptake [6]. These limitations are compounded by surface exposure to high solar radiation, wind, and temperature extremes, and by the lack of ground cover in early stages of reclamation [7,8]. Together, these factors lead to frequent drought stress, impaired seedling establishment, and low survival rates. Therefore, improving drought tolerance at the seedling stage through nursery-based interventions is critical for successful reclamation outcomes.
Nanotechnology offers emerging opportunities in agriculture and environmental applications [9,10,11]. Nanoparticles (1–100 nm), including carbon-based nanomaterials such as multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), exhibit unique properties that enable rapid cellular uptake and may enhance water uptake and drought tolerance in plants [12]. However, their effects on plant growth and physiology are inconsistent, with studies reporting positive [13], negative, or negligible effects depending on species, concentration, and application method [14,15,16]. For instance, MWCNTs can enhance the drought tolerance of plants by altering gene expression in crop species, activating water stress-related genes [17,18], and affect plant growth and development [19,20,21]. They can stimulate the production of antioxidants and osmoprotectants in seedlings, which protect them from oxidative stress caused by drought exposure [22]. MWCNTs can also enhance the photosynthetic capacity, improving their carbon assimilation rate, thereby increasing their water-use efficiency [23].
The effects of MWCNTs on plants vary depending on the type, concentration, and species of the plant used. For instance, Zhang et al. [23] reported that low concentrations (5 mg/L) had no effect on rice seedlings, whereas 20 mg/L promoted growth and increased chlorophyll content. Tiwari et al. [24] found that higher concentrations (>20 mg/L) inhibited growth in maize, whereas exposure to 50 mg/L of carboxyl-functionalized MWCNT increased dry biomass. While some studies have explored the use of MWCNTs to promote seed germination in boreal shrub species [25,26,27], their effects on drought-related physiological traits during the seedling stage remain largely unstudied. Conversely, studies on drought mitigation using MWCNTs have focused primarily on agricultural crops or model herbaceous species. To our knowledge, no prior studies have evaluated the effects of MWCNTs on drought physiology in native boreal shrubs used for reclamation.
In this study, we explored the potential of carboxyl-functionalized MWCNT, delivered via irrigation during seedling production, to alleviate drought-induced physiological stress in native boreal shrub species. We evaluated the combined effects of drought and MWCNT application on three native shrubs commonly used in boreal reclamation: Shepherdia canadensis (L.) Nutt., Cornus sericea L., and Viburnum edule. S. canadensis is a nitrogen-fixing, perennial deciduous shrub widely distributed across North America, including Alberta [28,29,30]. C. sericea is a fast-growing deciduous woody shrub native to much of North America and a vital source of food for many wild animals, including ruminants and birds [31]. V. edule is a cold-adapted shrub common to northern Canada and Alaska. Because MWCNT effects are often species- and concentration-dependent, we also examined whether responses varied among these shrubs across a moderate concentration range, with the aim of identifying patterns relevant to their potential use in reclamation. This study aimed to assess whether carboxyl-functionalized MWCNTs influence physiological drought responses in these native species during nursery production, providing insights into their potential relevance for early-stage reclamation practices.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material, Propagation, and Greenhouse Conditions

The study was conducted over a five-month period in the greenhouse at the Centre for Boreal Research (Northern Alberta Institute of Technology, Peace River, Alberta, Canada). One-year-old seedlings of three native boreal shrub species, Canadian buffaloberry (Shepherdia canadensis (L.) Nutt.), red-osier dogwood (Cornus sericea L.), and low-bush cranberry (Viburnum edule), were propagated from seeds collected near Peace River, Alberta.
Seeds of S. canadensis and C. sericea were cold-stratified at 4 °C for 12 and 8 weeks, respectively. Seeds of V. edule underwent a sequential stratification regime consisting of cold (4 °C), warm (20 °C), and cold (4 °C) treatments for 2, 3, and 3 months, respectively. Germination was carried out in trays containing a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of peat and vermiculite, maintained at approximately 24 °C during the day and 14 °C at night, under an 18 h photoperiod.
After completing one growing season, seedlings were overwintered in cold storage and utilized the following spring for the experiment. They were transplanted into plastic pots (18 cm height; 16 cm top diameter, 14 cm bottom diameter) containing a standard peat-based substrate.
Throughout both the propagation and experimental phases, the greenhouse environment was maintained at approximately 24 ± 3 °C (day) and 14 ± 3 °C (night), with ~60% relative humidity and an 18 h photoperiod supplemented by high-pressure sodium lighting.

2.2. Experiment Design

The experiment was a split-plot with three replicate blocks per species. Soil moisture was assigned at the main-plot level (well-watered, drought). Carboxyl-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) concentration (0 (control), 10, 30 mg L−1) was applied at the subplot level within each moisture main plot. Within subplots, seedlings were randomized completely.

2.3. Application of MWCNT and Soil Moisture Treatments

Carboxylic acid-functionalized MWCNT (outer diameter, 10–20 nm; length, 10–30 μm; purity, >95 wt%) (Table 1) was purchased from commercial suppliers Cheap Tubes Inc. (Grafton, VT, USA). MWCNT was weighed and mixed with deionized water and ultra-sonicated by a probe sonicator (Fisher Scientific, FB-505, Hampton, NH, USA) at 40% amplitude for 40 min to maximize dispersion [32,33,34]. The solution was delivered to the growing medium twice during the experiment (1 and 2 months after transplantation). Each plant was watered with 15 mL of MWCNT solution. To minimize cross-treatment mixing and maintain consistent water retention, each pot was placed in an individual plastic tray to capture any immediate drainage. The dispersion stability and persistence of MWCNTs in the substrate (e.g., via dynamic light scattering, zeta potential analysis, or microscopy) were not assessed, as the objective of this study was to evaluate seedling physiological responses to MWCNT application rather than characterize nanomaterial behavior.
All seedlings were watered every other day until two weeks after the second application of MWCNT. Then, drought stress was induced by withholding water for 14 days. The drought stress continues until the seedling reaches the wilting point. Soil volumetric water content (SVWC) was monitored using an SVWC sensor (5TE soil moisture and temperature, Decagon Devices Inc., Pullman, WA, USA) (Figure 1). Seedlings in the well-watered treatment were watered every other day to maintain moisture at ~0.3 to 0.35 m3/m3 (SVWC).

2.4. Foliar Gas Exchange Measurement

Measurements were conducted every two days from the initiation of the drought treatment. Gas exchange was measured non-destructively on the same seedlings across time to allow repeated measurements. For each species and treatment combination, three seedlings were measured within each of two replicate blocks (n = 3 per block), totaling six seedlings per species per treatment.
Foliar gas exchange was measured using a PP CIRAS-3 open gas exchange system, and measurements were made from samples placed in a PLC Universal Leaf Cuvette (PP Systems, Amesbury, MA, USA). A healthy and fully expanded leaf (4th or 5th from the top) was measured from three randomly selected seedlings from each treatment replicate grown under the following conditions: 22 °C air temperature, 50% relative humidity, 800 μmol m−2 s−1 photosynthetically active radiation, and 400 μmol mol−1 CO2. The measurements were carried out between 9:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. The net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration rate (E), and instantaneous water-use efficiency (iWUE) were obtained from these measurements.

2.5. Leaf Water Potential Measurement

Midday leaf water potential (ΨL) was measured to determine the whole plant water status. Two seedlings were randomly chosen from different plant species in each treatment combination. A fifth of a fully expanded and healthy leaf was cut and placed in a pressure chamber (Model 1000, PMS Instrument Co., Albany, OR, USA), which was pressurized using a nitrogen tank. The pressure (Ψ) was recorded when the initial xylem sap was observed from the cut end of the petiole. The measurement was conducted from 12:00 to 14:00 h.

2.6. Data Analysis

Gas exchange data were analyzed using a split-split plot ANOVA design. Soil moisture treatment (well-watered vs. drought) was assigned at the main plot level, MWCNT concentration (0, 10, 30 mg L−1) at the subplot level, and measurement day as a repeated sub-subplot factor. Measurements were taken repeatedly from the same seedlings over time. Each species was analyzed separately.
Prior to analysis, data were evaluated for normality and homogeneity of variance using probability plots and residual scatterplots. Following assumption checks, a three-way ANOVA was performed using R software (Version 3.6.0, R Development Core Team 2019). Effects were considered significant at p ≤ 0.05. When a significant main effect or interaction involving MWCNT concentration was detected, Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) post hoc test was used to compare treatment means.

3. Results

Drought-stressed seedlings exhibit a progressive reduction in midday leaf water potential (ΨL) during the experimental period, becoming significantly lower than the well-watered seedlings from day 7 (Figure 2). In contrast, well-watered seedlings maintained relatively stable ΨL throughout the experiment, with average values of −1.33 MPa for S. canadensis, −0.91 MPa for C. cericea, and −0.89 MPa for V. edule.
As shown in Table 2, the response of the physiological parameters measured was not affected by the effect of MWCTN concentration alone. However, species-specific differences were observed in the gas exchange responses. The response pattern of Pn differed between species (Figure 3). Water-withholding treatments led to a significant change in Pn on day 7 and day 11 for S. canadensis and V. edule, respectively (Figure 3A,C). In contrast, there was an initial increase in photosynthesis for C. cericea followed by a decrease (Figure 3B), indicating an optimal water potential threshold for maximizing photosynthetic potential (~−1.5 MPa). Accompanying the reduction in gas exchange, the decline in gs was by 31.4% and 25% for S. canadensis and C. cericea, respectively (Table 2; Figure 3D).
The effects of MWCNT concentration on gs were species- and time-dependent. In C. cericea, a significant decline in gs was observed mid-experiment period (day 7) in seedlings treated with the highest MWCNT concentration (30 mg L−1) under drought conditions (Table 2; Figure 4A). The difference within the MWCNT treatments disappeared with the progress of drought severity. In V. edule, gs remained unaffected by MWCNT treatment during the first week of water-withholding, but declined significantly in the second week under 30 mg L−1 treatment, showing 19% and 31% decline on day 9 and day 11, respectively, compared to MWCNT 10 mg/L. Relative to control seedlings (0 mg L−1), gs under 30 mg L−1 declined by 29% on day 7 and 15% on day 11 (Figure 4B). A similar trend was observed in the transpiration rate (E) of V. edule, where drought-exposed seedlings treated with 30 mg L−1 MWCNT exhibited significantly lower E compared to other concentrations on day 9. By day 11, the differences among MWCNT treatments diminished, with all treatments showing reduced E under drought. However, on day 13, E remained relatively stable under the 30 mg L−1 treatment, while seedlings under the 0 mg L−1 (control) and 10 mg L−1 treatments showed a further significant decline.
In the first half of the water-withholding treatment, the increase in IWUE was observed only for C. cericea; however, IWUE was found to fall rapidly in the second week of the experiment for drought seedlings (Figure 5D–F). The transpiration response pattern was similar to the photosynthesis and stomatal conductance (Figure 5A–C). Up to the beginning of the second week of water-withholding, there was no difference in Ci/Ca between well-watered seedlings and those exposed to drought treatments in both S. canadensis and C. cericea. However, Ci/Ca was significantly higher for both species in the second week of the experiment period. This observation was only seen at the last measurement for V. edule. Accompanying the rapid increase in Ci/Ca was a steep simultaneous decline in gs (Figure 3D–F and Figure 5G–I).

4. Discussion

This study evaluated whether carboxyl-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), delivered via irrigation, can mitigate drought-induced physiological stress in native boreal shrub species commonly used in land reclamation. Many previous studies, especially in agricultural crops and model herbaceous plants, such as Vigna radiata, Spinacia oleracea, and Arabidopsis thaliana, have reported that carbon nanotubes enhance photosynthesis (Pn) and chloroplast activity. These effects are often linked to stimulation of Rubisco, increased chlorophyll content, or improved electron transport [35,36,37,38]. However, such responses were not observed in our study. Instead, the physiological effects of MWCNTs were subtle, species-specific, and primarily evident in stomatal conductance (gs) under drought conditions. While some prior studies [39] have reported reductions in gs with MWCNT exposure, our findings provide new evidence from native woody perennials. This includes species-specific gs suppression under drought, a response not widely documented in the existing literature. These results highlight the importance of evaluating MWCNT effects in ecologically relevant species and stress conditions when considering potential applications in forest restoration or reclamation.
The present study revealed that reductions in gs were modulated by MWCNT concentration in both C. sericea and V. edule, but with different response patterns. In C. sericea, a significant interaction indicated that seedlings treated with 30 mg L−1 MWCNT exhibited earlier gs suppression under drought conditions compared to other concentrations, with effects most evident by day 7. In V. edule, gs suppression at 30 mg L−1 was detected as a main effect of concentration, emerging by days 9 and 11 and independent of soil moisture treatment, suggesting a more general sensitivity to MWCNT exposure. In contrast, S. canadensis did not exhibit clear physiological responses to the application of MWCNTs. Previous studies have reported that MWCNTs can alter membrane function by modifying lipid composition, increasing membrane rigidity and permeability, and enhancing aquaporin expression or activity, which together may influence water transport and indirectly affect stomatal regulation [40]. Similar concentration-dependent declines in gs have been reported by Izad et al. [39] in Orthosiphon stamineus, but only at much higher MWCNT levels (700–2100 mg L−1), where reductions in gs, Pn, and transpiration rate of up to ~50% relative to controls were accompanied by increased water use efficiency. Taken together, these findings suggest that native boreal shrubs can exhibit stomatal sensitivity to MWCNTs at substantially lower concentrations than some herbaceous species, but with species-specific differences in whether effects are drought-dependent or constitutive.
In addition, recent evidence suggests that MWCNTs can upregulate stress-responsive genes related to ABA signaling, reactive oxygen species detoxification, and drought acclimation (e.g., [41,42]). For example, Zhuzhukin et al. [41] reported that low concentrations of MWCNTs enhanced the expression of drought- and stress-related genes (e.g., DREB2, PR-1, PR-10, LEA8) in birch seedlings, whereas higher concentrations downregulated several of these genes. Although we did not measure gene expression in our study, such molecular responses may help explain the significant gs suppression observed under 30 mg L−1 MWCNT, which could reflect an amplification of endogenous drought-response pathways and a shift toward protective, though potentially growth-limiting, physiological adjustment.
The species-specific responses observed here are notable. V. edule exhibited delayed but significant gs suppression under 30 mg L−1 MWCNT, while C. sericea responded earlier in the drought cycle. This may reflect inherent differences in stomatal regulation or MWCNT sensitivity. In contrast, S. canadensis did not exhibit clear physiological responses to MWCNTs, suggesting either lower responsiveness or higher tolerance to MWCNTs exposure in this species. This raises the possibility that higher concentrations than those tested here may be required to elicit measurable responses in S. canadensis. Such interspecific differences highlight the importance of species screening when evaluating novel soil amendments for ecological applications. Previous work also shows that MWCNTs can affect gas exchange in contrasting ways, depending on the species and stress type; for example, Alp et al. [42] reported that MWCNT application alleviated the decline in gs under copper stress.
The MWCNT concentrations tested (0, 10, 30 mg L−1) provided preliminary insights into physiological responses, but they may not fully capture potential threshold or hormetic effects that have been reported elsewhere (e.g., [19,41]). The chosen range was selected to reflect concentrations previously used in both agricultural and forestry contexts, where the range of 10–30 mg L−1 MWCNTs has been shown to improve stress tolerance without apparent toxicity in plants (e.g., [41,43]). In contrast, higher concentrations (>50 mg L−1) have been associated with negative effects on plant physiology and morphology in several species [44], suggesting that 30 mg L−1 may already approach the upper threshold of physiological safety. Thus, while the aim of the present study was not to establish toxicity thresholds, the selected concentrations capture a range likely to be operationally effective for drought mitigation while avoiding confounding toxic effects. Future work should incorporate broader concentration gradients (e.g., 1–100 mg L−1) to better characterize dose–response relationships, identify thresholds or hormetic patterns, and assess potential toxicity or environmental persistence under field conditions.
Additional insights into species-specific drought physiology were provided by analysis of intercellular to ambient CO2 concentration (Ci/Ca). In S. canadensis and C. sericea, no significant differences were observed between droughted and control plants until the second week of drought, when Ci/Ca values increased significantly, indicating the onset of photosynthetic stress. In contrast, V. edule maintained stable Ci/Ca levels until the final measurement, suggesting a delayed physiological response to water deficit compared to the other species. An increase in the Ci/Ca ratio typically reflects non-stomatal limitations, where internal biochemical constraints, rather than reductions in stomatal conductance, restrict CO2 assimilation. This interpretation is consistent with Brodribb and Hill [45], who reported sharp increases in Ci/Ca and declines in PSII efficiency (Fv/Fm) in Podocarpus lawrencii under extreme drought, reflecting photoinhibition and metabolic suppression, not just CO2 diffusion limitation. Such reductions in photochemistry and Calvin cycle activity may represent irreversible photosynthetic damage under prolonged stress.
While our findings provide preliminary insights into the physiological effects of MWCNTs during early seedling development, their implications for reclamation must be considered cautiously. Our assessment was limited to gas exchange and leaf water potential, and did not include other informative drought tolerance indicators such as chlorophyll fluorescence, osmolyte accumulation, or root morphology [46,47,48], which could help distinguish between protective adjustments and stress-induced damage. In addition, long-term growth, survival, and ecological performance under natural field conditions remain unknown, as do potential trade-offs between short-term drought protection and sustained carbon assimilation or biomass accumulation. The environmental fate and persistence of carbon-based nanomaterials in boreal soils are also poorly understood, raising important questions about potential ecotoxicological risks and soil–microbe interactions [49,50]. Addressing these uncertainties will require extended trials that integrate broader physiological traits, follow seedling performance beyond the nursery stage, and evaluate environmental safety under operational reclamation scenarios.
In conclusion, this study demonstrates that carboxyl-functionalized MWCNTs can modulate stomatal behavior in native boreal shrubs, but in a species-specific and drought-intensity-dependent manner. C. sericea exhibited earlier reductions in gs under drought at the highest MWCNT concentration, whereas V. edule showed gs suppression as a main effect of MWCNT concentration, independent of water status. S. canadensis displayed little responsiveness within the tested range. These findings suggest that carboxyl-functionalized MWCNTs may help mitigate transpiration losses during water limitation, but at the potential cost of reduced CO2 diffusion and photosynthetic capacity. Such dual effects underscore the importance of optimizing MWCNT application to balance protective water-saving mechanisms with growth sustainability. Further research should extend the concentration gradients, incorporate molecular and biochemical analyses, and evaluate long-term performance under operational field conditions to fully assess the potential of MWCNTs as a drought mitigation strategy in forest restoration and reclamation.

Author Contributions

S.I. designed the study and conducted the experiment, collected the data, performed the analyses, and interpreted the data with input from B.T. and J.-M.S.; S.I. and B.T. prepared the manuscript with input and discussion of ideas from J.-M.S. and R.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Innovation Link Grant: 566262-21.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in FigShare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29998648.v1.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ryan O’Neill, technician of the Centre for Boreal Research, and summer students for their support during the experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mackenzie, D.D.; Naeth, M.A. The Role of the Forest Soil Propagule Bank in Assisted Natural Recovery after Oil Sands Mining. Restor. Ecol. 2010, 18, 418–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Naeth, M.A.; Wilkinson, S.R.; Mackenzie, D.D.; Archibald, H.A.; Powter, C.B. Potential of LFH Mineral Soil Mixes for Reclamation of Forested Lands in Alberta; University of Alberta: Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  3. Martens, L.A.; Landhäusser, S.M.; Lieffers, V.J. First-Year Growth Response of Cold-Stored, Nursery-Grown Aspen Planting Stock. New For. 2007, 33, 281–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Landhäusser, S.M.; Rodriguez-Alvarez, J.; Marenholtz, E.H.; Lieffers, V.J. Effect of Stock Type Characteristics and Time of Planting on Field Performance of Aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) Seedlings on Boreal Reclamation Sites. New For. 2012, 43, 679–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mikula, R.J.; Kasperski, K.L.; Burns, R.D.; MacKinnon, M.D. Nature and Fate of Oil Sands Fine Tailings; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  6. Seifert, J.R.; Jacobs, D.F.; Selig, M.F. Influence of Seasonal Planting Date on Field Performance of Six Temperate Deciduous Forest Tree Species. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 223, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sheldon, J.C. The Behaviour of Seeds in Soil: III. The Influence of Seed Morphology and the Behaviour of Seedlings on the Establishment of Plants from Surface-Lying Seeds. J. Ecol. 1974, 62, 47–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jumpponen, A.; Väre, H.; Mattson, K.G.; Ohtonen, R.; Trappe, J.M. Characterization of ‘Safe Sites’ for Pioneers in Primary Succession on Recently Deglaciated Terrain. J. Ecol. 1999, 87, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hata, K.; Futaba, D.N.; Mizuno, K.; Namai, T.; Yumura, M.; Iijima, S. Water-Assisted Highly Efficient Synthesis of Impurity-Free Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Science 2004, 306, 1362–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, H.; Yada, R. Nanotechnologies in Agriculture: New Tools for Sustainable Development. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 22, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rastogi, A.; Tripathi, D.K.; Yadav, S.; Chauhan, D.K.; Živčák, M.; Ghorbanpour, M.; El-Sheery, N.I.; Brestic, M. Application of Silicon Nanoparticles in Agriculture. 3 Biotech 2019, 9, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ditta, A.; Arshad, M.; Ibrahim, M. Nanoparticles in Sustainable Agricultural Crop Production: Applications and Perspectives. In Nanotechnology and Plant Sciences: Nanoparticles and Their Impact on Plants; Siddiqui, M.H., Al-Whaibi, M.H., Mohammad, F., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 55–75. ISBN 978-3-319-14502-0. [Google Scholar]
  13. Vera-Reyes, I.; Vázquez-Núñez, E.; Lira-Saldivar, R.H.; Méndez-Argüello, B. Effects of Nanoparticles on Germination, Growth, and Plant Crop Development. In Agricultural Nanobiotechnology; López-Valdez, F., Fernández-Luqueño, F., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 77–110. ISBN 978-3-319-96718-9. [Google Scholar]
  14. Begum, P.; Fugetsu, B. Phytotoxicity of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes on Red Spinach (Amaranthus tricolor L.) and the Role of Ascorbic Acid as an Antioxidant. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 243, 212–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Begum, P.; Ikhtiari, R.; Fugetsu, B.; Matsuoka, M.; Akasaka, T.; Watari, F. Phytotoxicity of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Assessed by Selected Plant Species in the Seedling Stage. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 262, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Haghighi, M.; Teixeira da Silva, J.A. The Effect of Carbon Nanotubes on the Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Four Vegetable Species. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 2014, 17, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khodakovskaya, M.V.; de Silva, K.; Nedosekin, D.A.; Dervishi, E.; Biris, A.S.; Shashkov, E.V.; Galanzha, E.I.; Zharov, V.P. Complex Genetic, Photothermal, and Photoacoustic Analysis of Nanoparticle-Plant Interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 1028–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yan, S.; Zhang, H.; Huang, Y.; Tan, J.; Wang, P.; Wang, Y.; Hou, H.; Huang, J.; Li, L. Single-Wall and Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotubes Promote Rice Root Growth by Eliciting the Similar Molecular Pathways and Epigenetic Regulation. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2016, 10, 222–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yousefi, S.; Kartoolinejad, D.; Naghdi, R. Effects of Priming with Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes on Seed Physiological Characteristics of Hopbush (Dodonaeaviscosa L.) under Drought Stress. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 2017, 74, 528–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Verma, S.K.; Das, A.K.; Gantait, S.; Kumar, V.; Gurel, E. Applications of Carbon Nanomaterials in the Plant System: A Perspective View on the Pros and Cons. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 667, 485–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kranjc, E.; Drobne, D. Nanomaterials in Plants: A Review of Hazard and Applications in the Agri-Food Sector. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Alluqmani, S.M.; Alabdallah, N.M. Exogenous Application of Carbon Nanoparticles Alleviates Drought Stress by Regulating Water Status, Chlorophyll Fluorescence, Osmoprotectants, and Antioxidant Enzyme Activity in Capsicum annumn L. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 57423–57433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, H.; Yue, M.; Zheng, X.; Xie, C.; Zhou, H.; Li, L. Physiological Effects of Single- and Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes on Rice Seedlings. IEEE Trans. NanoBiosci. 2017, 16, 563–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tiwari, D.K.; Dasgupta-Schubert, N.; Villaseñor Cendejas, L.M.; Villegas, J.; Carreto Montoya, L.; Borjas García, S.E. Interfacing Carbon Nanotubes (CNT) with Plants: Enhancement of Growth, Water and Ionic Nutrient Uptake in Maize (Zea mays) and Implications for Nanoagriculture. Appl. Nanosci. 2014, 4, 577–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ali, M.H.; Sobze, J.-M.; Pham, T.H.; Nadeem, M.; Liu, C.; Galagedara, L.; Cheema, M.; Thomas, R. Carbon Nanoparticles Functionalized with Carboxylic Acid Improved the Germination and Seedling Vigor in Upland Boreal Forest Species. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ali, M.H.; Sobze, J.-M.; Pham, T.H.; Nadeem, M.; Liu, C.; Galagedara, L.; Cheema, M.; Thomas, R. Carbon Nanotubes Improved the Germination and Vigor of Plant Species from Peatland Ecosystem Via Remodeling the Membrane Lipidome. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sobze, J.-M.; Galagedara, L.; Cheema, M.; Thomas, R.; Inoue, S. The Potential of Carbon Nanoparticles as a Stimulant to Improve the Propagation of Native Boreal Forest Species: A Mini-Review. Front. For. Glob. Change 2022, 5, 872780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rhoades, C.; Binkley, D.; Oskarsson, H.; Stottlemyer, R. Soil Nitrogen Accretion along a Floodplain Terrace Chronosequence in Northwest Alaska: Influence of the Nitrogen-Fixing Shrub Shepherdia canadensis. Écoscience 2008, 15, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Beddes, T.; Kratsch, H.A. Seed Germination of Roundleaf Buffaloberry (Shepherdia rotundifolia) and Silver Buffaloberry (Shepherdia argentea) in Three Substrates. J. Environ. Hortic. 2009, 27, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. USDA. Shepherdia canadensis (L.) Nutt; USDA Plants Database: Baton Rouge, LA, USA, 2011.
  31. Stevens, M.; Dozier, I. Redosier Dogwood cornussericea L.: Plant Guide; United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Plant Data Center & Carlinville (IL) Field Office: Washington, DC, USA, 2006.
  32. Yang, D.-Q.; Rochette, J.-F.; Sacher, E. Functionalization of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes by Mild Aqueous Sonication. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 7788–7794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Montazeri, A.; Chitsazzadeh, M. Effect of Sonication Parameters on the Mechanical Properties of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube/Epoxy Composites. Mater. Des. (1980–2015) 2014, 56, 500–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Frømyr, T.R.; Hansen, F.K.; Olsen, T. The Optimum Dispersion of Carbon Nanotubes for Epoxy Nanocomposites: Evolution of the Particle Size Distribution by Ultrasonic Treatment. J. Nanotechnol. 2012, 2012, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, H.; Zhang, M.; Song, Y.; Li, H.; Huang, H.; Shao, M.; Liu, Y.; Kang, Z. Carbon Dots Promote the Growth and Photosynthesis of Mung Bean Sprouts. Carbon 2018, 136, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lin, C.; Fugetsu, B.; Su, Y.; Watari, F. Studies on Toxicity of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes on Arabidopsis T87 Suspension Cells. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 170, 578–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hao, Y.; Yu, Y.; Sun, G.; Gong, X.; Jiang, Y.; Lv, G.; Zhang, Y.; Li, L.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, D.; et al. Effects of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and Nano-Silica on Root Development, Leaf Photosynthesis, Active Oxygen and Nitrogen Metabolism in Maize. Plants 2023, 12, 1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Giraldo, J.P.; Landry, M.P.; Faltermeier, S.M.; McNicholas, T.P.; Iverson, N.M.; Boghossian, A.A.; Reuel, N.F.; Hilmer, A.J.; Sen, F.; Brew, J.A. Plant Nanobionics Approach to Augment Photosynthesis and Biochemical Sensing. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 400–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Izad, A.I.; Ibrahim, M.H.; Abdullah, C.A.C.; Zain, N.A.M. Growth, Leaf Gas Exchange and Secondary Metabolites of Orthosiphon Stamineus as Affected by Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes Application. Annu. Res. Rev. Biol. 2018, 23, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Martínez-Ballesta, M.C.; Zapata, L.; Chalbi, N.; Carvajal, M. Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Enter Broccoli Cells Enhancing Growth and Water Uptake of Plants Exposed to Salinity. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2016, 14, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhuzhukin, K.V.; Evlakov, P.M.; Grodetskaya, T.A.; Gusev, A.A.; Zakharova, O.V.; Shuklinov, A.V.; Tomina, E.V. Effect of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes on the Growth and Expression of Stress Resistance Genes in Birch. Forests 2023, 14, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Alp, F.N.; Ozfidan-Konakci, C.; Yildiztugay, E.; Arikan, B.; Elbasan, F.; Ozmen, M.; Kucukoduk, M. Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Influence on Gas Exchange, Redox Reaction and Antioxidant System in Zea mays Exposed to Excessive Copper. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 41, 3169–3184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Luo, Y.; Zeng, W.; Lei, G.; Hou, Y.; Ao, C.; Chen, H.; Gaiser, T.; Srivastava, A.K. The Effects of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes and Bacillus Subtilis Treatments on the Salt Tolerance of Maize Seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1093529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hatami, M. Toxicity Assessment of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes on Cucurbita pepo L. under Well-Watered and Water-Stressed Conditions. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 142, 274–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Brodribb, T.; Hill, R.S. The Photosynthetic Drought Physiology of a Diverse Group of Southern Hemisphere Conifer Species Is Correlated with Minimum Seasonal Rainfall. Funct. Ecol. 1998, 12, 465–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ow, L.F.; Yeo, T.Y.; Sim, E.K. Identification of Drought-Tolerant Plants for Roadside Greening—An Evaluation of Chlorophyll Fluorescence as an Indicator to Screen for Drought Tolerance. Urban For. Urban Green. 2011, 10, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Davies, W.J.; Bacon, M.A. Adaptation of Roots to Drought. In Root Ecology; de Kroon, H., Visser, E.J.W., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2003; pp. 173–192. ISBN 978-3-662-09784-7. [Google Scholar]
  48. Brunner, I.; Herzog, C.; Dawes, M.A.; Arend, M.; Sperisen, C. How Tree Roots Respond to Drought. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Rezaei Cherati, S.; Anas, M.; Liu, S.; Shanmugam, S.; Pandey, K.; Angtuaco, S.; Shelton, R.; Khalfaoui, A.N.; Alena, S.V.; Porter, E.; et al. Comprehensive Risk Assessment of Carbon Nanotubes Used for Agricultural Applications. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 12061–12072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Lam, C.W.; James, J.T.; McCluskey, R.; Arepalli, S.; Hunter, R.L. A Review of Carbon Nanotube Toxicity and Assessment of Potential Occupational and Environmental Health Risks. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2006, 36, 189–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Soil volumetric water content (SVWC) over the experimental period in the drought treatment for Shepherdia canadensis, Cornus sericea, and Viburnum edule. The dotted line represents S. canadensis, the solid line C. sericea, and the dashed line V. edule.
Figure 1. Soil volumetric water content (SVWC) over the experimental period in the drought treatment for Shepherdia canadensis, Cornus sericea, and Viburnum edule. The dotted line represents S. canadensis, the solid line C. sericea, and the dashed line V. edule.
Applnano 06 00020 g001
Figure 2. Leaf water potential (ΨL) in S. canadensis, C. sericea, and V. edule under well-watered and drought conditions. Each bar represents the mean ± SE (n = 4) for each treatment. Values were pooled across MWCNT concentrations due to the absence of a significant MWCNT effect. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Fisher’s LSD, p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 2. Leaf water potential (ΨL) in S. canadensis, C. sericea, and V. edule under well-watered and drought conditions. Each bar represents the mean ± SE (n = 4) for each treatment. Values were pooled across MWCNT concentrations due to the absence of a significant MWCNT effect. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Fisher’s LSD, p ≤ 0.05).
Applnano 06 00020 g002
Figure 3. Net photosynthetic rate (Pₙ; panels (AC)) and stomatal conductance (gₛ; panels (DF)) measured in S. canadensis, C. sericea, and V. edule under well-watered (○) and drought (●) conditions over the experimental period. Each point represents mean ± SE (n = 18). Data were pooled across MWCNT concentrations (0 (control), 10, and 30 mg L−1) due to the absence of a significant MWCNT effect or interaction (see Table 2). Statistically significant effects were detected for soil moisture, measurement day, and their interaction. Different letters denote significant differences between treatments (Fisher’s LSD, p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 3. Net photosynthetic rate (Pₙ; panels (AC)) and stomatal conductance (gₛ; panels (DF)) measured in S. canadensis, C. sericea, and V. edule under well-watered (○) and drought (●) conditions over the experimental period. Each point represents mean ± SE (n = 18). Data were pooled across MWCNT concentrations (0 (control), 10, and 30 mg L−1) due to the absence of a significant MWCNT effect or interaction (see Table 2). Statistically significant effects were detected for soil moisture, measurement day, and their interaction. Different letters denote significant differences between treatments (Fisher’s LSD, p ≤ 0.05).
Applnano 06 00020 g003
Figure 4. Stomatal conductance (gs) measured in C. sericea (A) and V. edule (B), and transpiration rate (E) in V. edule (C), during the experimental period under different MWCNT concentrations (0 (control), 10, and 30 mg L−1) and two soil moisture treatments (well-watered and drought). In panels (A,C), data are shown for all combinations of MWCNT concentration and soil moisture (significant MWCNT × moisture × day interaction); in panel (B), data are pooled across soil moisture levels (no significant interaction). Solid and dashed lines represent well-watered and drought treatments, respectively; colors represent MWCNT concentrations. Data are presented as mean ± SE of six seedlings (n = 6 per species × treatment). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments (p ≤ 0.05; Fisher’s LSD test).
Figure 4. Stomatal conductance (gs) measured in C. sericea (A) and V. edule (B), and transpiration rate (E) in V. edule (C), during the experimental period under different MWCNT concentrations (0 (control), 10, and 30 mg L−1) and two soil moisture treatments (well-watered and drought). In panels (A,C), data are shown for all combinations of MWCNT concentration and soil moisture (significant MWCNT × moisture × day interaction); in panel (B), data are pooled across soil moisture levels (no significant interaction). Solid and dashed lines represent well-watered and drought treatments, respectively; colors represent MWCNT concentrations. Data are presented as mean ± SE of six seedlings (n = 6 per species × treatment). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments (p ≤ 0.05; Fisher’s LSD test).
Applnano 06 00020 g004
Figure 5. Transpiration rate (E), instantaneous water use efficiency (IWUE), and the ratio of intercellular to ambient CO2 concentration (Ci/Ca) measured in S. canadensis (A,D,G), C. sericea (B,E,H), and V. edule (C,F,I) during the experimental period under well-watered (○) and drought (●) conditions. Data were pooled across MWCNT concentrations due to the absence of significant MWCNT effects (see Table 2). Values are presented as mean ± SE (n = 18). Significant effects of soil moisture, measurement day, and their interaction were detected. Different letters denote statistically significant differences among treatments (Fisher’s LSD, p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 5. Transpiration rate (E), instantaneous water use efficiency (IWUE), and the ratio of intercellular to ambient CO2 concentration (Ci/Ca) measured in S. canadensis (A,D,G), C. sericea (B,E,H), and V. edule (C,F,I) during the experimental period under well-watered (○) and drought (●) conditions. Data were pooled across MWCNT concentrations due to the absence of significant MWCNT effects (see Table 2). Values are presented as mean ± SE (n = 18). Significant effects of soil moisture, measurement day, and their interaction were detected. Different letters denote statistically significant differences among treatments (Fisher’s LSD, p ≤ 0.05).
Applnano 06 00020 g005
Table 1. Properties of carboxyl-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes (COOH-MWCNTs) used in the experiment.
Table 1. Properties of carboxyl-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes (COOH-MWCNTs) used in the experiment.
MWCNT TypeOuter
Diameter
(nm)
Inside
Diameter
(nm)
Length
(µm)
Purity
(wt%)
Functional
Content
(wt%)
Ash
(wt%)
Specific
Surface Area (m2/g−1)
Bulk Density (g/cm−3)True Density (g/cm−3)
COOH-
MWCNTs
<82–510–30>955.58<1.55000.27~2.1
Table 2. Summary of F- and p-values from split-split plot ANOVA for physiological responses in S. canadensis, C. sericea, and V. edule under two soil moisture regimes (M), three MWCNT concentrations (C), and repeated measurements across time (D). Measurement day was treated as a repeated sub-subplot factor with six time points for S. canadensis and C. sericea, and seven for V. edule. Significant effects (p ≤ 0.05) are shown in bold. Degrees of freedom (DF) for each main effect and interaction are provided below the corresponding columns. Variables include net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration rate (E), intrinsic water use efficiency (iWUE), and the ratio of intercellular to ambient CO2 concentration (Ci/Ca).
Table 2. Summary of F- and p-values from split-split plot ANOVA for physiological responses in S. canadensis, C. sericea, and V. edule under two soil moisture regimes (M), three MWCNT concentrations (C), and repeated measurements across time (D). Measurement day was treated as a repeated sub-subplot factor with six time points for S. canadensis and C. sericea, and seven for V. edule. Significant effects (p ≤ 0.05) are shown in bold. Degrees of freedom (DF) for each main effect and interaction are provided below the corresponding columns. Variables include net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration rate (E), intrinsic water use efficiency (iWUE), and the ratio of intercellular to ambient CO2 concentration (Ci/Ca).
VariableMCM × CDM × DC × DM × C × D
FpFpFpFpFpFpFp
S. canadensis
Pn10.260.0850.440.6730.090.91318.38<0.0111.83<0.010.760.6690.290.978
gs13.760.0661.910.2620.020.98219.49<0.019.68<0.011.640.1430.710.707
IWUE5.360.1470.030.9710.020.97912.66<0.0123.68<0.010.220.9930.220.992
E33.420.0291.480.3300.050.95531.60<0.019.84<0.011.400.2260.730.688
Ci/Ca4.500.1680.240.7940.340.72821.76<0.0117.56<0.010.220.9920.180.997
(DF = 1)(DF = 2)(DF = 2)(DF = 5)(DF = 5)(DF = 10)(DF = 10)
C. cericea
Pn11.970.0410.880.5010.240.80351.29<0.0181.31<0.010.570.8241.050.427
gs10.480.0480.990.4680.130.88334.45<0.0158.67<0.010.920.5272.180.049
iWUE14.140.0331.510.3521.180.41930.88<0.0158.97<0.010.420.9280.310.974
E10.020.0510.540.6300.100.90438.73<0.0151.01<0.010.600.8032.070.060
Ci/Ca20.190.0210.900.4940.980.47044.67<0.0147.72<0.010.590.8090.350.957
(DF = 1)(DF = 2)(DF = 2)(DF = 5)(DF = 5)(DF = 10)(DF = 10)
V. edule
Pn0.150.7360.020.9831.030.43518.60<0.017.543<0.011.550.1520.720.727
gs11.650.0760.730.5350.250.78919.86<0.0110.72<0.012.210.0331.880.072
IWUE0.250.6660.120.8930.960.45811.89<0.014.424<0.011.240.2980.410.950
E546.7<0.010.330.7390.920.47124.09<0.0110.47<0.012.400.0212.700.011
Ci/Ca0.0010.9750.830.5001.730.2889.99<0.013.668<0.011.770.0930.420.948
(DF = 1)(DF = 2)(DF = 2)(DF = 6)(DF = 6)(DF = 12)(DF = 12)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Inoue, S.; Tedla, B.; Sobze, J.-M.; Thomas, R. Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube Application Alters Stomatal Behavior in Boreal Shrubs Under Drought Conditions. Appl. Nano 2025, 6, 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/applnano6040020

AMA Style

Inoue S, Tedla B, Sobze J-M, Thomas R. Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube Application Alters Stomatal Behavior in Boreal Shrubs Under Drought Conditions. Applied Nano. 2025; 6(4):20. https://doi.org/10.3390/applnano6040020

Chicago/Turabian Style

Inoue, Sahari, Binyam Tedla, Jean-Marie Sobze, and Raymond Thomas. 2025. "Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube Application Alters Stomatal Behavior in Boreal Shrubs Under Drought Conditions" Applied Nano 6, no. 4: 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/applnano6040020

APA Style

Inoue, S., Tedla, B., Sobze, J.-M., & Thomas, R. (2025). Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube Application Alters Stomatal Behavior in Boreal Shrubs Under Drought Conditions. Applied Nano, 6(4), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/applnano6040020

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop