Next Article in Journal
Non-Precious Metal Graphene-Based Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction
Previous Article in Journal
Electrochemical Reduction of CO2: Overcoming Chemical Inertness at Ambient Conditions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Electrochem
Volume 1
Issue 1
10.3390/electrochem1010007
electrochem-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spinel to Rock-Salt Transformation in High Entropy Oxides with Li Incorporation

by
Junbo Wang
1,†,
David Stenzel
1,†,
Raheleh Azmi
2,
Saleem Najib
3,
Kai Wang
4,
Jaehoon Jeong
1,
Abhishek Sarkar
1,5,
Qingsong Wang
1,
Parvathy Anitha Sukkurji
1,
Thomas Bergfeldt
6,
Miriam Botros
1,
Julia Maibach
2,
Horst Hahn
1,5,7,
Torsten Brezesinski
1,* and
Ben Breitung
1,*
1
Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
2
Institute for Applied Materials–Energy Storage Systems, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
3
Faculty of Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
4
Department of Materials and Earth Sciences, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
5
Joint Research Laboratory Nanomaterials, Technische Universität Darmstadt and Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 64206 Darmstadt, Germany
6
Institute for Applied Materials–Applied Materials Physics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
7
Helmholtz Institute Ulm for Electrochemical Energy Storage, 89081 Ulm, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Authors contributed equally.
Electrochem 2020, 1(1), 60-74; https://doi.org/10.3390/electrochem1010007
Submission received: 21 February 2020 / Revised: 9 March 2020 / Accepted: 11 March 2020 / Published: 16 March 2020
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
High entropy oxides (HEOs) constitute a promising class of materials with possibly new and largely unexplored properties. The virtually infinite variety of compositions (multi-element approach) for a single-phase structure allows the tailoring of their physical properties and enables unprecedented materials design. Nevertheless, this level of versatility renders their characterization as well as the study of specific processes or reaction mechanisms challenging. In the present work, we report the structural and electrochemical behavior of different multi-cationic HEOs. Phase transformation from spinel to rock-salt was observed upon incorporation of monovalent Li+ ions, accompanied by partial oxidation of certain elements in the lattice. This transition was studied by X-ray diffraction, inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and attenuated total reflection infrared spectroscopy. In addition, the redox behavior was probed using cyclic voltammetry. Especially, the lithiated rock-salt structure HEOs were found to exhibit potential for usage as negative and positive electrode materials in rechargeable lithium-ion batteries.

1. Introduction

The concept of entropy stabilization in multi-component alloys has gained increasing interest in recent years, starting with the synthesis of high entropy alloys (HEAs) [1,2]. Since the first report on HEAs, controversial discussions about the role of configurational entropy have continued to take place, while a solid proof of entropy stabilization is still lacking [3]. High entropy materials typically comprise a variety of different elements and are characterized by forming single-phase lattice structures, despite the potential propensity of the incorporated elements to crystallize into different phases when separated [4,5]. Recently, this concept has been applied to ceramics, resulting in the development of high entropy oxides (HEOs) [6,7], carbides [8,9], borides [10], nitrides [11], and many other materials [12,13,14].
The first paper on HEOs was published by Rost et al. in 2015 and reported about the rock-salt structure of equimolar (NiCuZnMgCo)O (space group Fm−3m) [7]. Since then, a large number of studies on different structures and application of HEOs have been reported [15,16,17]. For example, Dąbrowa et al. elaborated on the homogeneity of spinel-type (NiFeMnCrCo)3O4 (space group Fd−3m) [16]. In addition, the recent findings by Bérardan et al. on (NiCuZnMgCo)1−x−yGayAxO (with A = Li, Na, K) showed that the charge compensation mechanism when using monovalent elements involves the formation of oxygen vacancies, resulting in a decrease in lattice parameters [18]. Lately, HEOs have been shown to have potential as conversion, intercalation, and insertion materials for application in Li- and Na-ion batteries (LIBs and SIBs) [5,13,17,19,20,21,22]. Nevertheless, the role of Li+ in HEO structures (e.g., rock-salt [23] or spinel [24]) and the associated behaviors of the other incorporated elements have not yet been understood.
While the lithiation mechanism of binary or ternary oxide systems has been investigated quite extensively, the lithiation of HEOs has largely remained unclear due to their complex nature (the presence of different metal ions makes a detailed analysis very complicated). However, investigations into the evolution of lattice structure in conventional transition-metal oxides during the de/lithiation process provide valuable insights into the overall mechanism and help in postulating theories to explain the observed crystallographic changes [5]. A good example is the transition of Co3O4 from a spinel phase into a rock-salt phase upon lithiation, either by chemical or electrochemical means. The spinel material converts into a partially ordered rock-salt compound (LiCo3O4) with Li insertion into octahedral 16c Wyckoff sites, leading to a shift of Co3+ positions from the tetragonal 8a sites to adjacent octahedral sites [25,26,27,28].
In this work, we study the effect of Li incorporation on the lattice structure of spinel-type materials (NiFeMnCrCo)xOy, (NiFeMnCrMg)xOy, and (NiFeMnZnMg)xOy. The Li content was gradually increased by tailoring the amount of precursor used in the synthesis. The addition of monovalent ions to a mixed M2+/M3+ (spinel) or M2+ (rock-salt, with M = metal) phase requires charge compensation and, depending on the Li concentration, may lead to phase transformation. To gather information about the charge compensation mechanism, elements that are known to exhibit multiple oxidation states were substituted out in a stepwise approach by elements that exhibit a single distinct oxidation state (Co2+/3+ → Mg2+ and Cr3+/6+ → Zn2+). In addition, the redox behavior of Lix(NiFeMnCrCo)yOz in LIB cells has been tested to assess the overall application potential in the battery field.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis

Three different HEO materials were prepared, namely Lix(NiFeMnCrCo)yOz, Lix(NiFeMnCrMg)yOz, and Lix(NiFeMnZnMg)yOz, with gradually increasing lithium contents (x = 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1). They were produced via the nebulized spray pyrolysis method [6]. To this end, equimolar solutions of the respective metal salts were prepared from Ni(NO3)2·6H2O (Alfa Aesar, Haverhill, MA, USA, 98%), Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (abcr GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany, 98%), Mn(NO3)2·3H2O (abcr GmbH, 98%), Cr(NO3)3·9H2O (abcr GmbH, 99%), Co(NO3)2·6H2O (abcr GmbH, 99%), Mg(NO3)2·6H2O (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, 99%), Zn(NO3)2 (Riedel-de Haën, Seelze, Germany), and LiNO3 (Alfa Aesar, 99%). The resultant precursor solutions were transformed into fine droplets by an ultrasonic nebulizer and further transported using flowing nitrogen through a hot-wall reactor (1050 °C). The particles were collected on filter paper maintained at 120 °C in order to prevent water vapor condensation on the deposited powders.

2.2. Structural and Microstructural Characterization

The structure and phase purity of the as-prepared HEO materials were examined by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) using a STOE Stadi P diffractometer, equipped with a Ga-Jet X-ray source using Ga-Kβ radiation.
The elemental composition was determined by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES, iCAP 7600DUO from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). About 10 mg of the respective samples (weighing accuracy ± 0.05 mg) were dissolved in 6 mL of hydrochloric acid, 2 mL of nitric acid, and 4 mL of sulfuric acid at 513 K for 35 min in a microwave oven (Speedwave Xpert from Berghof). Analysis was accomplished using four different calibration solutions and an internal standard (Sc). Two or three major wavelengths of elements were used for calculation. The oxygen content was probed by the method of carrier gas hot extraction (CGHE) using a commercial oxygen/nitrogen analyzer TC600 (LECO). The oxygen concentration was calibrated with the certified standard KED 1025, a steel powder from ALPHA, and the calibration was verified using a commercial powder (NMC 532 MTI). The calibration range was close to the sample concentration. The standards and the samples were weighed with a mass in the range from 1 to 3 mg in Sn crucibles (9–10 mm). Then, 5 mg of graphite were added and wrapped. Combined with a Sn pellet (~200 mg), they were placed into a Ni crucible. The package was loaded in an outgassed (5800 W) high-temperature graphite crucible. The measurements were conducted at 5000 W. Evolving CO2 and CO were swept out by helium as inert carrier gas and measured via infrared detectors.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was conducted on powder samples dispersed on a lacey carbon-coated copper grid. The samples were loaded onto an FEI double tilt holder. TEM imaging data were collected using an FEI Titan 80-300 microscope, equipped with a CEOS image spherical aberration corrector, HAADF STEM detector (Fischione model 3000), EDAX SUTW EDX detector, and a Tridiem Gatan image filter. The microscope was operated at an accelerating voltage of 300 kV.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed on a K-Alpha+ instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with a monochromatic Al-Kα X-ray source (1486.6 eV) and 400 μm spot size. The K-Alpha+ charge compensation system was applied to prevent localized charge buildup during analysis using 8 eV electrons and low-energy Ar ions. Data acquisition and processing were carried out using the Thermo Avantage software [29]. The spectra were fitted with one or more Voigt profiles. The binding energies are reported with respect to the C 1s peak of hydrocarbons at 285.0 eV. The analyzer transmission function, Scofield sensitivity factors [30], and effective attenuation lengths (EALs) for photoelectrons were applied for quantification. EALs were calculated using the standard TPP-2M formalism [31].
Attenuated total reflection infrared (ATR-IR) spectroscopy was performed using a Nicolet iS50 ATR FT-IR from Thermo Scientific.

2.3. Electrochemical Characterization

Electrodes for cell testing were prepared by doctor blading (100 µm slit size) on Al foil (Gelon LIB Co., Ltd., Shandong, China) and Cu foil (MTI Corporation, Richmond, CA, USA). The slurry contained 63 wt.% of HEO as active material, 22 wt.% Super C65 carbon black additive (Timcal, Bironico, Switzerland), and 15 wt.% polyvinylidene difluoride binder (Solef5130, Solvay, Hannover, Germany) dissolved in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (Sigma Aldrich). The resultant electrodes were dried in a vacuum at 80 °C for 12 h, followed by punching out circular disks of 13 mm diameter. LIB cells were assembled in an Ar-filled glovebox. Li metal foil (Gelon LIB Co., Ltd.) was used as counter electrode, glass microfiber filter paper (GF/C, Whatman, Freiburg, Germany) as separator, and 1 M LiPF6 in a 3:7 weight mixture of ethylene carbonate:ethyl methyl carbonate (LP57, BASF SE, Ludwigshafen, Germany) as electrolyte. Cyclic voltammetry was performed using a Bio-logic potentiostat (VMP3). The voltage range was set to either 2.0−4.5 V or 0.1−3.0 V versus Li+/Li. The sweep rate was 0.1 mV/s.

3. Results and Discussion

In the present work, the spinel to rock-salt phase transformation with increasing Li concentration in HEOs was investigated. Such transition is relatively well-known for simple oxides and has been the subject of many studies. However, the lithiation mechanism found here strongly differs from that observed for binary and ternary spinel compounds.
The HEOs employed were prepared via the nebulized spray pyrolysis method, allowing the incorporation of lithium without any additional chemical or electrochemical post-treatment steps. The Li content was gradually increased, while keeping the ratio of the other metals constant. In particular, three different HEOs were prepared, namely Lix(NiFeMnCrCo)yOz (HEO-1), Lix(NiFeMnCrMg)yOz (HEO-2), and Lix(NiFeMnZnMg)yOz (HEO-3), with x varying from 0 to 1. Upon lithiation, different structures and oxidation states were expected to evolve, as the monovalent Li+ ions in mixed-valence spinel or rock-salt systems must be compensated for in order to maintain charge neutrality.
The structural transition was investigated by means of powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD). Figure 1 shows PXRD patterns of the as-prepared materials, revealing the change from spinel to rock-salt structure with increasing Li content. The elements highlighted in the respective formulas represent those that were replaced by others during the course of this study. For HEO-1 (Figure 1a), the relative intensity of the (220), (311), (422), and (511) reflections was found to decrease, while the reflection positions remained unchanged with addition of lithium. At the same time, the intensity of the (222) and (400) reflections increased, thereby indicating changes in form or structure factor of the unit cell. However, the symmetry remained unaltered. For certain Li concentrations (x = 0.6–0.8), the spinel phase transformed into a rock-salt structure. Upon increasing the Li content further, only reflections corresponding to the rock-salt structure were present. Notably, there were no other (crystalline) phases or side products forming. Based on the PXRD results, we conclude that the transition to rock-salt was virtually completed for x > 0.6.
Figure 1b shows PXRD patterns obtained for HEO-2, where Co has been substituted for by Mg. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, see below) showed that the non-lithiated HEO-1 contained mainly Co2+. In contrast, in the lithiated state, Co2+ was oxidized to Co3+. By replacing Co2+/3+ with Mg2+, the charge compensation associated with the Co redox was eliminated. Hence, some changes in phase transformation behavior can be anticipated. In fact, comparing the intensities of the (311) and (222) reflections of HEO-1 and HEO-2 for x = 0.4 revealed some differences among the materials. This in turn suggests larger changes in structure or form factor, most probably because of differences in the overall charge compensation mechanism. Moreover, when Cr was replaced by Zn (HEO-3, Figure 1c), complete transformation into the rock-salt structure was already evident for x = 0.4. This finding demonstrates that the transition occurred at lower Li concentrations if the average charge of the metal ions involved was reduced (Co2+/3+ → Mg2+ and Cr3+/6+ → Zn2+).
Inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) and carrier gas hot extraction (CGHE) were used to determine the stoichiometries (chemical compositions). Figure 2 shows the corresponding data for the HEO-1 with different Li contents. While the theoretical metal to oxygen ratio of spinel-type M3O4 materials is 0.75, the relative cation concentration increases when a rock-salt phase of general formula M1O1 is formed. This trend was indeed observed in the data, where a maximum of 0.9 was achieved. Based on the ICP-OES results, the stoichiometries of the compounds were calculated, with the details given in Table 1. Excess oxygen for high Li contents (x > 0.8) can be explained by the presence of Li2CO3 contaminants. The formation of carbonate surface species is well-known for LIB cathode materials (e.g., layered Li(Ni1–x–yCoxMny)O2, NCM) [32,33]. Note that Li2O and other Li-containing impurities underwent reactions with H2O and CO2 in the ambient atmosphere. The presence of carbonates was also confirmed by attenuated total reflection infrared spectroscopy (ATR-IR) and XPS (see below).
XPS was conducted on both HEO-1 and HEO-2 (see Supplementary Information Figure S1 for HEO-3) to gain insights into the chemical states of the elements. Co in the non-lithiated HEO-1 was present as Co2+ (87% of total Co, from the characteristic Co2+ satellite peak at 786.4 eV). In contrast, for Li(NiFeMnCrCo)O (x = 1), Co was in the oxidation state +3 (Figure 3a) [34,35,36,37,38]. As expected, Mg in the non-lithiated and lithiated HEO-2 (with Mg 1s binding energies of 1303.4 and 1303.7 eV, respectively) was present as Mg2+ (Figure 3b) [39,40]. Identification of the Ni oxidation state solely on the basis of the Ni 2p peak is challenging [34,35,36,37,38,41,42,43,44]. However, an overlay of all Ni 2p spectra (Figure S1) of HEO-1 and HEO-2 revealed only minor differences among the lithiated and non-lithiated materials. Moreover, the spectra could be fitted with a multiplet set of Ni2+ ions according to the deconvolution approach presented in ref [35] (Figure 3c). Therefore, the oxidation state of Ni in the non-lithiated and lithiated HEO-1 and HEO-2 can be assigned to +2. Cr was present as Cr3+; however, the ions were partially oxidized to Cr6+ for the lithiated material. While Cr3+ showed multiplet splitting (Figure 3d), Cr6+ has an empty valence band and thus a sharp single peak at 579.9 eV emerged (Figure 3d) [38,45,46]. According to the fitting results, in the lithiated HEO-1 and HEO-2 (x = 1), 50 and 80% of total Cr, respectively, were present as Cr6+. The increased Cr6+ fraction in HEO-2 is a direct result of the ceased Co2+/3+ redox couple.
Figure S1 reveals that the Zn ions in HEO-3 (with Zn 2p3/2 and Zn LMM binding energies of 1021.6 and 497.6 eV [kinetic energy of 989 eV], respectively) are in the oxidation state +2. The Fe 2p spectra of HEO-1 in Figure 4a were not deconvoluted because of overlapping with the Co LMM Auger on the higher binding energy side of Fe 2p3/2. For HEO-2, peak fitting indicated the presence of Fe2+ (30%) and Fe3+ (70%) in the non-lithiated material and only Fe3+ in the lithiated material [38,47]. Because of intense multiplet splitting of Mn in the 2p data, usually the Mn 3s and 3p peaks are used to determine the oxidation state [35,36,38,48]. However, such analysis was hampered by the overlap of photoelectron peaks of Mg, Zn, Li, Fe, and Cr. Nevertheless, from the Mn 3p spectrum of the lithiated HEO-1 in Figure S1, the occurrence of peaks centered at 47.8 and 49.6 eV was apparent. This in turn suggests the presence of at least two different Mn species [48]. Upon lithiation, the higher binding energy component emerged clearly, indicating Mn4+ contribution, whereas the lower binding energy peak in the Mn 3p spectrum suggests mixed Mn2+/3+ state (the binding energy is higher than that normally found for Mn2+ and lower than for Mn3+) [48]. The commonly observed multiplet splitting in Mn 2p [35,36,38] and the overlap with the Ni LMM Auger line led to a large number of peaks in the fitting procedure. Following the fitting approach developed for battery cathode materials, as presented in refs [35,36], the Mn 2p spectra for the non-lithiated HEO-1 and HEO-2 (Figure 4b) were fitted successfully assuming Mn3+ and Mn4+ multiplets. The fraction of Mn4+ in both of these materials was calculated to be ~30%. However, it increased to 90% for the lithiated HEO-1 and to 100% for the lithiated HEO-2 (the Mn 2p peak could be fitted assuming only Mn4+ multiplets).
Moreover, inspection of the C 1s spectra of HEO-1 and HEO-2 (Figure S1) revealed a new, intense peak emerging at 290 eV after lithiation. This peak coincided with an increase in intensity in the O 1s spectrum at 531.5 eV (Figure S1) and can be attributed to the formation of Li2CO3. This result agrees with previous related findings [35].
In summary, we conclude that the lithiation of HEO-1 and HEO-2 led to total or partial oxidation of Co, Mn, Fe, and Cr, whereas Ni, Zn (in HEO-3), and Mg remained in their initial oxidation state (details in Table 2).
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements were conducted to examine the materials’ morphology and to probe the distribution of elements in the crystal structure. Note that non-uniform distribution would decrease the configurational entropy, thereby hinting at phase separation. Figure 5 shows high-resolution TEM micrographs of the non-lithiated and lithiated HEO-1 (see also high-angle annular dark-field scanning TEM [HAADF STEM] micrograph in Figure S2). In both cases, the particles, which consist of small crystallites, are of spherical shape, with sizes ranging from the nanometer to the micrometer length scale. Moreover, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) in STEM mode of the same samples confirmed the uniform elemental distributions (Figure 6).
Attenuated total reflection infrared (ATR-IR) spectroscopy was performed to monitor the aforementioned carbonate formation. As can be seen from Figure 7, the lithiated HEO-1 and HEO-2 materials indeed produced characteristic carbonate bands (1500 cm‒1, 1430 cm‒1, 870 cm‒1) [49]. Interestingly, an additional band appeared around 900 cm‒1 after the phase transformation (for x ≥ 0.8). This band can be assigned to CrO42‒, supporting the appearance of Cr6+ in the XPS spectra [50]. The fact that it was rather broad is probably because of the local environment with several different metal species present. At this time, it is unclear why CrO42‒ only formed after the structural transition. However, some explanation can be obtained from the experimental data. Both XPS and ATR-IR revealed the formation of surface contaminates (carbonate and chromate species) in the lithiated HEOs. Assuming that the rock-salt phase was saturated for x = 0.6−0.8, a further increase in concentration would result in Li excess. Such Li-containing species may react with the ambient air and/or surrounding metal ions, thereby forming Li2CrO4 and Li2CO3. This was also corroborated by CGHE, indicating increasing oxygen contents for x > 0.8 (HEO-1) and 0.6 (HEO-2).
Finally, cyclic voltammetry was performed to learn about the redox behaviors of HEO-1 (Figure 8) and HEO-2 (Figure S3) as a function of Li content in the voltage ranges of 2.0–4.5 V and 0.1–3.0 V versus Li+/Li. To this end, tape-cast electrodes were assembled in coin cells and cycled against Li metal as counter electrode. The sweep rate was set to 0.1 mV/s. Figure 8a shows the cyclic voltammetric curves of the initial cycle for the low-voltage region. The reduction potential (cathodic peak position) was found to gradually increase with increasing Li concentration until the rock-salt phase was formed. This behavior differs from that of simple oxides. For example, rock-salt CoO and spinel Co3O4 have been shown to exhibit reduction potentials of 0.58 and 0.85 V versus Li+/Li, respectively [51]. Overall, this result seems to be due to the increased oxidation state of metals in the rock-salt structure (high Li content), as shown in the section on XPS above. As can be seen from Figure 8a, the reduction potentials are 0.25 V for x = 0, 0.37 V for x = 0.2, 0.44 V for x = 0.4, 0.52 V for x = 0.6, 0.61 V for x = 0.8, and 0.59 V for x = 1. Except for the increase in x from 0.8 to 1, the reduction potential increased in a stepwise manner by 80−120 mV. Figure 8b shows the cyclic voltammetric curves of the initial cycle for the high-voltage region. As somewhat expected, the spinel-type HEO-1 materials showed minor redox activity above 3.5 V. However, for the highly lithiated, rock-salt structure HEO-1 with x ≥ 0.8, two pairs of oxidation/reduction peaks were observed. This result indicates that, after the transition to rock-salt phase, Li can be extracted from the lattice, leading to (partially) reversible redox behavior (see also cyclic voltammetric curves in Figure S4). However, whether or not this is directly connected to the structure or the Li concentration cannot be comprehensively concluded at this stage; further research is clearly required to answer this question. Nevertheless, the strong increase in specific current coincided with the structural changes detected by PXRD and ATR-IR.
Lithiated HEO-1 (x = 1) was further studied to determine whether structural changes occur in the initial cycle. To this end, the electrodes were extracted from the cells after reaching 4.5 V, 2.0 V, and after the first cycle (denoted by colored circles in Figure 9a) and probed using PXRD. As can be seen from Figure 9b, all patterns show the characteristic rock-salt reflections, thus indicating that the lattice structure is retained. However, some changes in reflection broadening are apparent and deserve more study.

4. Conclusions

In this work, three different HEOs were analyzed regarding the phase transformation from spinel to rock-salt with incorporation of monovalent Li+ ions during synthesis. Charge compensation was found to be accompanied by full or partial oxidation of some of the elements (note that, interestingly, the Ni(II) did not change oxidation state during chemical lithiation). When oxidation was not possible, the spinel-type HEO transformed into a rock-salt phase of lower average charge. Hence, this transition can be tailored to some degree by replacing the multivalent elements (e.g., Co2+/3+ → Mg2+ and Cr3+/6+ → Zn2+) present in the lattice. Moreover, the formation of surface carbonate and chromate species in the rock-salt structure HEOs was observed via XPS and ATR-IR. Their formation seems to be associated with excess Li when exceeding a certain threshold concentration. Electrochemical testing using cyclic voltammetry revealed increasing redox activity with increasing Li content. In particular, the lithiated rock-salt HEOs deserve further investigation into their performance as negative and positive electrode materials in rechargeable lithium-ion batteries.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2673-3293/1/1/7/s1, Figure S1. XPS spectra of the O 1s, C 1s, Li 1s, Ni 2p, Zn 2p, Zn LMM, and Mg 1s core level regions for HEO-1 (with x = 0 and 1), HEO-2 (with x = 0 and 1), and HEO-3 (with x = 0.4); Figure S2. HAADF STEM micrograph of HEO-1; Figure S3. Cyclic voltammograms of HEO-2 (with x = 0 and 1) in the voltage range of a) 0.1–3.0 V and b) 2.0–4.5 V versus Li+/Li. Note that only the initial cycle is shown; Figure S4. Cyclic voltammograms at 1 mV/s for the 5th to 12th cycles of HEO-1 (with x = 1) in the voltage range of 2.0–4.5 V versus Li+/Li.

Author Contributions

J.W. and D.S. conducted the synthesis and performed the electrochemical characterization. S.N. helped in the electrochemical testing and co-wrote the manuscript. K.W. performed the TEM measurements. J.J. and P.A.S. performed the ATR-IR spectroscopy measurements. J.M. and R.A. performed the XPS measurements, analyzed the data, and provided input to the manuscript. T.B. (Thomas Bergfeldt) was responsible for ICP-OES. A.S. and Q.W. planned and guided the experiments. M.B. contributed to the data discussion and proof reading. H.H., T.B. (Torsten Brezesinski), and B.B. supervised the work and co-wrote the manuscript. B.B. also performed the PXRD measurements. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

A.S. and H.H. acknowledge financial support from the Helmholtz Association and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (HA 1344/43-1). D.S., B.B., and Q.W. appreciate the support through EnABLES, a project funded by the Europeans Union´s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement no. 730957. P.A.S. acknowledges the Ministry of Science, Research and Arts of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg for funding research through the MERAGEM graduate school fellowship. J.J. acknowledges the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD, no. 91650506). J.W. acknowledges financial support from the China Scholarship Council (CSC). S.N. acknowledges the Christian Bürkert Foundation.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support from the Karlsruhe Nano Micro Facility (KNMF, www.knmf.kit.edu), a Helmholtz research infrastructure at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT, www.kit.edu). This work contributes to the research performed at CELEST (Center for Electrochemical Energy Storage Ulm-Karlsruhe).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cantor, B.; Chang, I.T.H.; Knight, P.; Vincent, A.J.B. Microstructural development in equiatomic multicomponent alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2004, 375, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yeh, J.-W.; Chen, S.-K.; Lin, S.-J.; Gan, J.-Y.; Chin, T.-S.; Shun, T.-T.; Tsau, C.-H.; Chang, S.-Y. Nanostructured High-Entropy Alloys with Multiple Principal Elements: Novel Alloy Design Concepts and Outcomes. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2004, 6, 299–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Miracle, D.B.; Senkov, O.N. A critical review of high entropy alloys and related concepts. Acta Mater. 2017, 122, 448–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Berardan, D.; Meena, A.K.; Franger, S.; Herrero, C.; Dragoe, N. Controlled Jahn-Teller distortion in (MgCoNiCuZn)O-based high entropy oxides. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 704, 693–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sarkar, A.; Velasco, L.; Wang, D.; Wang, Q.; Talasila, G.; de Biasi, L.; Kübel, C.; Brezesinski, T.; Bhattacharya, S.S.; Hahn, H.; et al. High entropy oxides for reversible energy storage. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Sarkar, A.; Djenadic, R.; Usharani, N.J.; Sanghvi, K.P.; Chakravadhanula, V.S.K.; Gandhi, A.S.; Hahn, H.; Bhattacharya, S.S. Nanocrystalline multicomponent entropy stabilised transition metal oxides. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2017, 37, 747–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rost, C.M.; Sachet, E.; Borman, T.; Moballegh, A.; Dickey, E.C.; Hou, D.; Jones, J.L.; Curtarolo, S.; Maria, J.P. Entropy-stabilized oxides. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Castle, E.; Csanádi, T.; Grasso, S.; Dusza, J.; Reece, M. Processing and Properties of High-Entropy Ultra-High Temperature Carbides. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Zhou, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, F.; Niu, B.; Lei, L.; Wang, W. High-entropy carbide: A novel class of multicomponent ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 22014–22018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gild, J.; Zhang, Y.; Harrington, T.; Jiang, S.; Hu, T.; Quinn, M.C.; Mellor, W.M.; Zhou, N.; Vecchio, K.; Luo, J. High-Entropy Metal Diborides: A New Class of High-Entropy Materials and a New Type of Ultrahigh Temperature Ceramics. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jin, T.; Sang, X.; Unocic, R.R.; Kinch, R.T.; Liu, X.; Hu, J.; Liu, H.; Dai, S. Mechanochemical-Assisted Synthesis of High-Entropy Metal Nitride via a Soft Urea Strategy. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1707512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gild, J.; Braun, J.; Kaufmann, K.; Marin, E.; Harrington, T.; Hopkins, P.; Vecchio, K.; Luo, J. A high-entropy silicide: (Mo0.2Nb0.2Ta0.2Ti0.2W0.2)Si2. J. Mater. 2019, 5, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, Q.; Sarkar, A.; Wang, D.; Velasco, L.; Azmi, R.; Bhattacharya, S.S.; Bergfeldt, T.; Düvel, A.; Heitjans, P.; Brezesinski, T.; et al. Multi-anionic and -cationic compounds: New high entropy materials for advanced Li-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 2433–2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Oses, C.; Toher, C.; Curtarolo, S. High-entropy ceramics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bérardan, D.; Franger, S.; Dragoe, D.; Meena, A.K.; Dragoe, N. Colossal dielectric constant in high entropy oxides. Phys. Status Solidi Rapid Res. Lett. 2016, 10, 328–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Dąbrowa, J.; Stygar, M.; Mikuła, A.; Knapik, A.; Mroczka, K.; Tejchman, W.; Danielewski, M.; Martin, M. Synthesis and microstructure of the (Co,Cr,Fe,Mn,Ni)3O4 high entropy oxide characterized by spinel structure. Mater. Lett. 2018, 216, 32–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhao, C.; Ding, F.; Lu, Y.; Chen, L.; Hu, Y.S. High-Entropy Layered Oxide Cathodes for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Bérardan, D.; Franger, S.; Meena, A.K.; Dragoe, N. Room temperature lithium superionic conductivity in high entropy oxides. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 9536–9541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Sarkar, A.; Wang, Q.; Schiele, A.; Chellali, M.R.; Bhattacharya, S.S.; Wang, D.; Brezesinski, T.; Hahn, H.; Velasco, L.; Breitung, B. High-Entropy Oxides: Fundamental Aspects and Electrochemical Properties. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1806236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, Q.; Sarkar, A.; Li, Z.; Lu, Y.; Velasco, L.; Bhattacharya, S.S.; Brezesinski, T.; Hahn, H.; Breitung, B. High entropy oxides as anode material for Li-ion battery applications: A practical approach. Electrochem. Commun. 2019, 100, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qiu, N.; Chen, H.; Yang, Z.; Sun, S.; Wang, Y.; Cui, Y. A high entropy oxide (Mg0.2Co0.2Ni0.2Cu0.2Zn0.2O) with superior lithium storage performance. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 777, 767–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Breitung, B.; Wang, Q.; Schiele, A.; Tripković, Đ.; Sarkar, A.; Velasco, L.; Wang, D.; Bhattacharya, S.S.; Hahn, H.; Brezesinski, T. Gassing Behavior of High-Entropy Oxide Anode and Oxyfluoride Cathode Probed Using Differential Electrochemical Mass Spectrometry. Batter. Supercaps 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bo, S.H.; Li, X.; Toumar, A.J.; Ceder, G. Layered-to-Rock-Salt Transformation in Desodiated NaxCrO2 (x 0.4). Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 1419–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Mohanty, D.; Kalnaus, S.; Meisner, R.A.; Rhodes, K.J.; Li, J.; Payzant, E.A.; Wood, D.L.; Daniel, C. Structural transformation of a lithium-rich Li1.2Co0.1Mn0.55Ni0.15O2 cathode during high voltage cycling resolved by in situ X-ray diffraction. J. Power Sources 2013, 229, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Thackeray, M.M.; Baker, S.D.; Adendorff, K.T.; Goodenough, J.B. Lithium insertion into Co3O4: A preliminary investigation. Solid State Ionics 1985, 17, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nam, K.M.; Shim, J.H.; Han, D.W.; Kwon, H.S.; Kang, Y.M.; Li, Y.; Song, H.; Seo, W.S.; Park, J.T. Syntheses and characterization of wurtzite CoO, rocksalt CoO, and spinel Co3O4 nanocrystals: Their interconversion and tuning of phase and morphology. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 4446–4454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Charlotte Li, J.; He, K.; Stach, E.A.; Su, D. Comparison of Co3O4 and CoO Nanoparticles as Anodes for Lithium-ion Batteries. Microsc. Microanal. 2015, 21, 477–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Li, J.; He, K.; Meng, Q.; Li, X.; Zhu, Y.; Hwang, S.; Sun, K.; Gan, H.; Zhu, Y.; Mo, Y.; et al. Kinetic Phase Evolution of Spinel Cobalt Oxide during Lithiation. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 9577–9585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Parry, K.L.; Shard, A.G.; Short, R.D.; White, R.G.; Whittle, J.D.; Wright, A. ARXPS characterisation of plasma polymerised surface chemical gradients. Surf. Interface Anal. 2006, 38, 1497–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Scofield, J.H. Hartree-Slater subshell photoionization cross-sections at 1254 and 1487 eV. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenomena 1976, 8, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tanuma, S.; Powell, C.J.; Penn, D.R. Calculations of electron inelastic mean free paths. IX. Data for 41 elemental solids over the 50 eV to 30 keV range. Surf. Interface Anal. 2011, 43, 689–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jung, R.; Morasch, R.; Karayaylali, P.; Phillips, K.; Maglia, F.; Stinner, C.; Shao-Horn, Y.; Gasteiger, H.A. Effect of Ambient Storage on the Degradation of Ni-Rich Positive Electrode Materials (NMC811) for Li-Ion Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165, A132–A141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hatsukade, T.; Schiele, A.; Hartmann, P.; Brezesinski, T.; Janek, J. Origin of Carbon Dioxide Evolved during Cycling of Nickel-Rich Layered NCM Cathodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 38892–38899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mariappan, C.R.; Kumar, V.; Azmi, R.; Esmezjan, L.; Indris, S.; Bruns, M.; Ehrenberg, H. High electrochemical performance of 3D highly porous Zn0.2Ni0.8Co2O4 microspheres as an electrode material for electrochemical energy storage. CrystEngComm 2018, 20, 2159–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Azmi, R.; Masoumi, M.; Ehrenberg, H.; Trouillet, V.; Bruns, M. Surface analytical characterization of LiNi0.8-yMnyCo0.2O2 (0 ≤ y ≤ 0.4) compounds for lithium-ion battery electrodes. Surf. Interface Anal. 2018, 50, 1132–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Azmi, R.; Trouillet, V.; Strafela, M.; Ulrich, S.; Ehrenberg, H.; Bruns, M. Surface analytical approaches to reliably characterize lithium ion battery electrodes. Surf. Interface Anal. 2018, 50, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kumar, V.; Mariappan, C.R.; Azmi, R.; Moock, D.; Indris, S.; Bruns, M.; Ehrenberg, H.; Vijaya Prakash, G. Pseudocapacitance of Mesoporous Spinel-Type MCo2O4 (M = Co, Zn, and Ni) Rods Fabricated by a Facile Solvothermal Route. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 6003–6013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Biesinger, M.C.; Payne, B.P.; Grosvenor, A.P.; Lau, L.W.M.; Gerson, A.R.; Smart, R.S.C. Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: Cr, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 2717–2730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Diler, E.; Lescop, B.; Rioual, S.; Nguyen Vien, G.; Thierry, D.; Rouvellou, B. Initial formation of corrosion products on pure zinc and MgZn2 examinated by XPS. Corros. Sci. 2014, 79, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mittal, V.K.; Chandramohan, P.; Bera, S.; Srinivasan, M.P.; Velmurugan, S.; Narasimhan, S.V. Cation distribution in NixMg1-xFe2O4 studied by XPS and Mössbauer spectroscopy. Solid State Commun. 2006, 137, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Biesinger, M.C.; Payne, B.P.; Lau, L.W.M.; Gerson, A.; Smart, R.S.C. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic chemical state quantification of mixed nickel metal, oxide and hydroxide systems. Surf. Interface Anal. 2009, 41, 324–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Grosvenor, A.P.; Biesinger, M.C.; Smart, R.S.C.; McIntyre, N.S. New interpretations of XPS spectra of nickel metal and oxides. Surf. Sci. 2006, 600, 1771–1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Payne, B.P.; Biesinger, M.C.; McIntyre, N.S. Use of oxygen/nickel ratios in the XPS characterisation of oxide phases on nickel metal and nickel alloy surfaces. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenomena 2012, 185, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Biesinger, M.C.; Lau, L.W.M.; Gerson, A.R.; Smart, R.S.C. The role of the Auger parameter in XPS studies of nickel metal, halides and oxides. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 2434–2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Payne, B.P.; Biesinger, M.C.; McIntyre, N.S. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies of reactions on chromium metal and chromium oxide surfaces. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenomena 2011, 184, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Biesinger, M.C.; Brown, C.; Mycroft, J.R.; Davidson, R.D.; McIntyre, N.S. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies of chromium compounds. Surf. Interface Anal. 2004, 36, 1550–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Grosvenor, A.P.; Kobe, B.A.; Biesinger, M.C.; McIntyre, N.S. Investigation of multiplet splitting of Fe 2p XPS spectra and bonding in iron compounds. Surf. Interface Anal. 2004, 36, 1564–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Töpfer, J.; Feltz, A.; Gräf, D.; Hackl, B.; Raupach, L.; Weissbrodt, P. Cation Valencies and Distribution in the Spinels NiMn2O4 and MzNiMn2−zO4 (M = Li, Cu) Studied by XPS. Phys. Status Solidi 1992, 134, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pasierb, P.; Komornicki, S.; Rokita, M.; Rȩkas, M. Structural properties of Li2CO3-BaCO3 system derived from IR and Raman spectroscopy. J. Mol. Struct. 2001, 596, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Johnston, C.P.; Chrysochoou, M. Investigation of chromate coordination on ferrihydrite by in situ ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and theoretical frequency calculations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 5851–5858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Reddy, M.V.; Prithvi, G.; Loh, K.P.; Chowdari, B.V.R. Li storage and impedance spectroscopy studies on Co3O4, CoO, and CoN for Li-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 680–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Electrochem 01 00007 g001 550
Figure 1. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns of (a) high entropy oxide (HEO)-1, (b) HEO-2, and (c) HEO-3 with different Li contents. Transition from spinel to rock-salt phase occurs with increasing lithium concentration.
Figure 1. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns of (a) high entropy oxide (HEO)-1, (b) HEO-2, and (c) HEO-3 with different Li contents. Transition from spinel to rock-salt phase occurs with increasing lithium concentration.
Electrochem 01 00007 g001
Electrochem 01 00007 g002 550
Figure 2. Inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) of (a–f) HEO-1 with different Li contents. All numbers are given in units of at.%. Increasing M:O ratio indicates transition from spinel to rock-salt phase. Excess oxygen is due to Li2CO3 formation. ICP-OES data for HEO-2 follow the same trend, but show the highest M:O ratios for lower Li contents (Table 1).
Figure 2. Inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) of (a–f) HEO-1 with different Li contents. All numbers are given in units of at.%. Increasing M:O ratio indicates transition from spinel to rock-salt phase. Excess oxygen is due to Li2CO3 formation. ICP-OES data for HEO-2 follow the same trend, but show the highest M:O ratios for lower Li contents (Table 1).
Electrochem 01 00007 g002
Electrochem 01 00007 g003 550
Figure 3. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of (a) Co for HEO-1, (b) Mg for HEO-2, (c) Ni for HEO-1, and (d) Cr for HEO-1 and HEO-2 in the non-lithiated (x = 0) and lithiated states (x = 1).
Figure 3. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of (a) Co for HEO-1, (b) Mg for HEO-2, (c) Ni for HEO-1, and (d) Cr for HEO-1 and HEO-2 in the non-lithiated (x = 0) and lithiated states (x = 1).
Electrochem 01 00007 g003
Electrochem 01 00007 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Fe 2p and (b) Mn 2p XPS spectra of HEO-1 and HEO-2 in the non-lithiated (x = 0) and lithiated states (x = 1).
Figure 4. (a) Fe 2p and (b) Mn 2p XPS spectra of HEO-1 and HEO-2 in the non-lithiated (x = 0) and lithiated states (x = 1).
Electrochem 01 00007 g004
Electrochem 01 00007 g005 550
Figure 5. TEM micrographs at different magnifications of HEO-1 (a and b) in the non-lithiated (x = 0) and (c and d) lithiated states (x = 1).
Figure 5. TEM micrographs at different magnifications of HEO-1 (a and b) in the non-lithiated (x = 0) and (c and d) lithiated states (x = 1).
Electrochem 01 00007 g005
Electrochem 01 00007 g006 550
Figure 6. STEM-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) mapping of HEO-1 in the non-lithiated (x = 0) and lithiated states (x = 1).
Figure 6. STEM-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) mapping of HEO-1 in the non-lithiated (x = 0) and lithiated states (x = 1).
Electrochem 01 00007 g006
Electrochem 01 00007 g007 550
Figure 7. Attenuated total reflection infrared (ATR-IR) spectroscopy of (a) HEO-1 and (b) HEO-2 with different Li contents.
Figure 7. Attenuated total reflection infrared (ATR-IR) spectroscopy of (a) HEO-1 and (b) HEO-2 with different Li contents.
Electrochem 01 00007 g007
Electrochem 01 00007 g008 550
Figure 8. Cyclic voltammograms for HEO-1 with different Li contents in the voltage range of (a) 0.1–3.0 V and (b) 2.0–4.5 V versus Li+/Li. Note that only the initial cycle is shown for clarity.
Figure 8. Cyclic voltammograms for HEO-1 with different Li contents in the voltage range of (a) 0.1–3.0 V and (b) 2.0–4.5 V versus Li+/Li. Note that only the initial cycle is shown for clarity.
Electrochem 01 00007 g008
Electrochem 01 00007 g009 550
Figure 9. Structural changes during de/lithiation of HEO-1 (with x = 1). (a) Representative cyclic voltammogram and (b) the corresponding PXRD patterns.
Figure 9. Structural changes during de/lithiation of HEO-1 (with x = 1). (a) Representative cyclic voltammogram and (b) the corresponding PXRD patterns.
Electrochem 01 00007 g009
Table
Table 1. Stoichiometries of HEO-1 and HEO-2 with different Li contents from ICP-OES analysis.
Table 1. Stoichiometries of HEO-1 and HEO-2 with different Li contents from ICP-OES analysis.
Normalized to O (Exact)Metal to Oxygen Ratio (Exact)Normalized to Metals Other than Li (Rounded)
HEO-1Li0(Ni0.15Fe0.15Mn0.15Cr0.14Co0.15)O10.74:1 (~M3O4, spinel)Li0M1O1.4
Li0.15(Ni0.14Fe0.14Mn0.13Cr0.13Co0.14)O10.83:1Li0.2M1O1.5
Li0.25(Ni0.12Fe0.12Mn0.12Cr0.11Co0.12)O10.84:1Li0.4M1O1.7
Li0.34(Ni0.11Fe0.11Mn0.11Cr0.10Co0.11)O10.88:1Li0.6M1O1.9
Li0.41(Ni0.10Fe0.10Mn0.10Cr0.09Co0.10)O10.90:1 (~M1O1, rock-salt)Li0.8M1O2
Li0.41(Ni0.08Fe0.08Mn0.08Cr0.08Co0.08)O10.81:1 (carbonate impurities)Li1M1O2.5
HEO-2Li0(Ni0.14Fe0.14Mn0.14Cr0.14Mg0.14)O10.70:1 (~M3O4, spinel)Li0M1O1.4
Li0.15(Ni0.14Fe0.13Mn0.13Cr0.13Mg0.14)O10.82:1Li0.2M1O1.5
Li0.25(Ni0.12Fe0.12Mn0.12Cr0.12Mg0.12)O10.85:1Li0.4M1O1.7
Li0.35(Ni0.11Fe0.11Mn0.11Cr0.11Mg0.11)O10.90:1 (~M1O1, rock-salt)Li0.6M1O1.8
Li0.39(Ni0.10Fe0.10Mn0.10Cr0.10Mg0.10)O10.89:1Li0.8M1O2
Li0.44(Ni0.08Fe0.08Mn0.08Cr0.08Mg0.08)O10.84:1 (carbonate impurities)Li1.1M1O2.5
Table
Table 2. Metal oxidation states and the corresponding fractions for HEO-1 and HEO-2 in the non-lithiated (x = 0) and lithiated states (x = 1) from XPS analysis.
Table 2. Metal oxidation states and the corresponding fractions for HEO-1 and HEO-2 in the non-lithiated (x = 0) and lithiated states (x = 1) from XPS analysis.
NiFeMnCrCoMg
(NiFeMnCrCo)ONi2+Not quantified70% Mn3+
30% Mn4+		100% Cr3+87% Co2+
13% Co3+		-
Li(NiFeMnCrCo)ONi2+Not quantified10% Mn3+
90% Mn4+		50% Cr3+
50% Cr6+		100% Co3+-
(NiFeMnCrMg)ONi2+30% Fe2+
70% Fe3+		70% Mn3+
30% Mn4+		100% Cr3+-Mg2+
Li(NiFeMnCrMg)ONi2+100% Fe3+100% Mn4+20% Cr3+
80% Cr6+		-Mg2+

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, J.; Stenzel, D.; Azmi, R.; Najib, S.; Wang, K.; Jeong, J.; Sarkar, A.; Wang, Q.; Sukkurji, P.A.; Bergfeldt, T.; et al. Spinel to Rock-Salt Transformation in High Entropy Oxides with Li Incorporation. Electrochem 2020, 1, 60-74. https://doi.org/10.3390/electrochem1010007

AMA Style

Wang J, Stenzel D, Azmi R, Najib S, Wang K, Jeong J, Sarkar A, Wang Q, Sukkurji PA, Bergfeldt T, et al. Spinel to Rock-Salt Transformation in High Entropy Oxides with Li Incorporation. Electrochem. 2020; 1(1):60-74. https://doi.org/10.3390/electrochem1010007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Junbo, David Stenzel, Raheleh Azmi, Saleem Najib, Kai Wang, Jaehoon Jeong, Abhishek Sarkar, Qingsong Wang, Parvathy Anitha Sukkurji, Thomas Bergfeldt, and et al. 2020. "Spinel to Rock-Salt Transformation in High Entropy Oxides with Li Incorporation" Electrochem 1, no. 1: 60-74. https://doi.org/10.3390/electrochem1010007

APA Style

Wang, J., Stenzel, D., Azmi, R., Najib, S., Wang, K., Jeong, J., Sarkar, A., Wang, Q., Sukkurji, P. A., Bergfeldt, T., Botros, M., Maibach, J., Hahn, H., Brezesinski, T., & Breitung, B. (2020). Spinel to Rock-Salt Transformation in High Entropy Oxides with Li Incorporation. Electrochem, 1(1), 60-74. https://doi.org/10.3390/electrochem1010007

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop