Previous Article in Journal
Theoretical Investigation of Ru-Doped Wurtzite Zno: Insights into Electronic Structure and Photocatalytic Potential
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Magneto-Optical Properties of a Ferrofluid with Chitosan Coating

by
Dulce Araceli Guzman-Rocha
1,
Alejandrina Martinez-Gamez
2,
José Luis Lucio-Martinez
3,
Carlos Herman Wiechers-Medina
3,
Mario Eduardo Cano-Gonzales
4 and
Rene Garcia-Contreras
1,*
1
Área de Nanoestructuras y Biomateriales, Laboratorio de Investigación Interdisciplinaria, Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores (ENES), Unidad León, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), León 37684, Guanajuato, Mexico
2
Centro de Investigaciones en Óptica, León 37150, Guanajuato, Mexico
3
División de Ciencias e Ingenierías Campus León, León 37150, Guanajuato, Mexico
4
Centro Universitario de la Ciénega, Universidad de Guadalajara, Ocotlán 47810, Jalisco, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Optics 2025, 6(4), 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/opt6040046
Submission received: 4 July 2025 / Revised: 15 August 2025 / Accepted: 19 September 2025 / Published: 26 September 2025

Abstract

The use of magnetic materials, such as ferrofluids, is of great importance in biomedical applications, and as a result, interest in studying their magneto-optical properties has grown significantly in recent years. Therefore, in this work, magnetic nanoparticles were synthesized with chitosan coating, leaving the product as a ferrofluid in aqueous solution. Structural, morphological, magnetic, and optical characterization was carried out obtaining a cubic structure centered on the faces, a spherical morphology with a size distribution of 10–14 nm according to TEM images and a magnetic saturation of 53 emu/g. In the optical properties, the effect of chitosan shell on the forbidden band was studied, showing a blue-shifting effect, due to reduction on the inner magnetic nanoparticles size.

1. Introduction

Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) of magnetite and maghemite (Fe3O4, γ-Fe2O3) in aqueous solution are called ferrofluids, which have colloidal properties of interest for biomedical applications. They also have magnetic properties very similar to NPM powder [1,2]. In recent years, researchers have shown growing interest in the magneto-optical properties of ferrofluids, especially because of their potential in innovative technologies like tunable photonic devices, holographic tweezers, and smart sensors [3].
Understanding the structural, magnetic, morphological, and optical characteristics of MNPs is essential for identifying the most suitable applications for these nanoparticles. Some of the key advantages of these materials include their compatibility with biological systems, their ability to break down naturally in the body, and their generally low toxicity. These qualities make them highly suitable for a variety of biomedical uses, including magnetic labeling of cells, cancer hyperthermia, phototherapy, targeted drug delivery, and as contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging [4,5,6,7,8,9,10].
The study of light transmittance through ferrofluids is of great interest both experimentally and theoretically. The first studies reported were by Philip et al., in 2008 [11], who studied the magneto-optic effects of magnetic nanoparticles in the ferrofluid. Their results showed that the intensity of light transmitted in ferrofluids would decline through a magnetic field where the incident light goes along the orientation of the field. It was also observed that the transmitted intensity recovered to its initial phase while the external field disappeared. Based on a detailed analysis of the results, the authors suggested that the intriguing effects observed were likely caused by resonances occurring within the embedded nanoparticles [12,13].
Numerous studies have explored the fascinating interplay between magnetic fields and light transmission in ferrofluids, revealing promising avenues for both fundamental science and biomedical applications. For instance, Rablau et al. (2008) [14] investigated how light intensity changes over time as it passes through a ferrofluid under a magnetic field. They observed that the transmitted light initially drops sharply to zero—due to the rapid formation of chain-like aggregates of nanoparticles aligned with the field—and then gradually increases as the system reaches equilibrium, a behavior driven by dynamic light scattering processes. Building on this, Philip and Laskar (2012) [15] reviewed the diverse optical properties of ferrofluids. They emphasized their potential in biomedical fields, particularly in imaging and targeted therapy, due to their tunable optical response under magnetic stimuli.
More recent contributions have expanded our understanding of this magneto-optical phenomenon. Vales-Pinzón et al. (2014) [16] demonstrated that adding carbon nanotubes to ferrofluids enhances polarized light transmission under magnetic influence, indicating a potential route for improving anisotropic optical materials. Shulyma and colleagues (2016) [17] reported a striking inversion of extinction trends in ferrofluids when exposed to magnetic fields, revealing a complex balance between particle interactions and field strength. Jin et al. (2018) [18] further analyzed the wavelength-dependent scattering behavior of ferrofluids, showing how external fields modulate light diffusion in real-time, which is crucial for optical device design. Finally, Lakic et al. (2019) [19] provided compelling optical evidence for magnetic-field-induced aggregation in different ferrite-based ferrofluids, comparing cobalt ferrite, magnetite, and magnesium ferrite systems. Their findings underscore how the composition of nanoparticles influences their collective optical behavior, particularly under external stimuli. Together, these studies underscore the dynamic and responsive nature of ferrofluids, laying the groundwork for their integration into smart optical systems, biosensing platforms, and magnetically controlled biomedical devices.
MNPs are used to create ferrofluids (FFs) of nanoparticles as polar or non-polar liquid carriers, having the property of magnetism as characteristics. Ferrofluids exhibit properties such as optical anisotropy, birefringence in the presence of a magnetic field and field-dependent transmission. All these properties make the study of FFs of great interest for developing optoelectronic devices with various applications, mainly in the biomedical area [20].
Although numerous studies have examined the optical applications of ferrofluids, the magneto-optic interactions—particularly those involving nanoparticle aggregation—remain insufficiently explored. Similarly, the influence of different types of coatings on magnetic nanoparticles has not been extensively investigated.
In this study, we systematically investigate the influence of chitosan surface functionalization on the physicochemical, magnetic, and optical properties of magnetite nanoparticles (MNPs), with a particular emphasis on their magneto-optical behavior and suitability for biomedical applications. Chitosan, a biocompatible and biodegradable polysaccharide, was selected as the coating agent due to its proven ability to stabilize nanoparticle suspensions and modulate interfacial interactions under physiological conditions.
We hypothesize that the incorporation of a chitosan shell will mitigate surface oxidation, preserve the superparamagnetic behavior, and induce a measurable shift in optical absorption characteristics due to changes in surface energy and particle–matrix interactions. These modifications are anticipated to enhance the functional performance of the resulting ferrofluids, positioning them as promising candidates for applications such as magnetic hyperthermia, biosensing, and targeted drug delivery.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis of the Magnetic Nanoparticles

The method of co-precipitation in situ used in this work to obtain magnetic nanoparticles was detailed by Guzman-Rocha et al., 2022 [21]. Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) were synthesized via a co-precipitation method using stoichiometric amounts of FeCl3 (0.4 M, 11 mL) and FeCl2 (0.2 M, 11 mL) dissolved in 100 mL of deionized water containing 10 mL of a 10% w/w chitosan solution. The chitosan used had a medium molecular weight (approximately 190–310 kDa) and a degree of deacetylation of about <75% (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). These characteristics were selected based on prior work by our research group [22], where chitosan with similar specifications has been shown to provide effective steric and electrostatic stabilization, enhancing colloidal dispersion and maintaining biocompatibility in magnetite-based nanomaterials. The mixture was stirred for 5 min at room temperature and then slowly poured into 19 mL of 0.3 M ammonium hydroxide under vigorous stirring. The reaction was conducted under an inert atmosphere and the temperature was gradually increased to 90 °C and maintained for 90 min. During the reaction, a black precipitate formed, indicating the generation of magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles. The resulting ferrofluid was washed three times with deionized water, separated by magnetic decantation, and stored in aqueous suspension. In the case of chitosan-coated nanoparticles (MNP-Q), the presence of low-molecular-weight chitosan in the reaction medium facilitated polymer adsorption onto the surface of the forming nanoparticles, enhancing their stability and biocompatibility.

2.2. Characterization Structural and Morphological

The crystalline structure of the MNP and MNP-Q samples was identified by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) performed in a Bruker D8 Advance powder diffractometer (Billerica, MA, USA) using Cu Kα radiation. The patterns were recorded between 20° and 80°. For this analysis, part of the sample is dried at 50 °C for 24 h, and then 40 mg is placed in the sample holder of the X-ray diffraction equipment. Particle size and shape were determined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a JEOL-JEM1010 (100 keV) microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), with a digital Camera Gatan SC200 (Gatan, Pleasanton, CA, USA). To determine the average particle size and distribution, the longest internal dimension of at least 200 individual nanoparticles was measured using the ImageJ software (version 1.54p, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

2.3. Infrared Spectroscopy with Fourier Transform (FTIR)

The FTIR was used, utilizing an ATR (Attenuated Total Reflection) accessory to evaluate the interaction between the sample and infrared radiation. The samples were desiccated at 50 °C to subtract excess water for analysis. The FTIR spectra were logged in transmittance units within the 4000–400 cm−1 range in a Bruker Vertex 70 V spectrometer (Billerica, MA, USA). At the same time, thermogravimetric (TG) analysis and differential thermal analysis were performed on instrument SDT Q600 (New Castle, De, USA). Samples were heated from room temperature to 900 °C at 10 °C/min under an air flow of 100 mL/min.

2.4. Magnetization Measurements

Magnetic properties of the samples were evaluated at room temperature using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) system (Quantum Design VersaLab and MagLabVSM, Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK). Powder samples of MNP and MNP-Q were pre-dried at 50 °C for 24 h, accurately weighed, and compacted into sample holders to ensure reproducibility and comparability. Hysteresis curves (M vs. H) were recorded at 290 K, with applied magnetic fields ranging from −12,500 to +12,500 Oe for general characterization, and up to ±15,000 Oe in selected tests. This allowed for a detailed analysis of the superparamagnetic behavior before and after chitosan grafting. Additionally, measurements of magnetization covering the temperature interval from 50 to 400 K were performed, following the ZFC/FC protocol and using 100 Oe of static magnetic field.

2.5. Optical Measurements

The optical properties of the magnetite nanoparticles (MNP) and chitosan-coated magnetite nanoparticles (MNP-Q) were characterized using a PerkinElmer Lambda 900 UV-Vis-NIR spectrophotometer (Waltham, MA, USA). Absorbance spectra were collected in the spectral range of 200–1600 nm with a resolution of 1 nm, at room temperature. Before measurement, aqueous suspensions of both samples were prepared and placed in 1 cm path length quartz cuvettes to ensure consistency and minimize scattering effects.
The optical band gap energy (Eg) was estimated using the Tauc plot method, and direct and indirect electronic transitions were present (UV-VIS, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The absorption coefficient (α) was calculated from the absorbance data, and (αhν)2 was plotted against the photon energy (hν), for direct and indirect electronic transition, respectively. The Eg value for each sample was determined by extrapolating the linear region of the curve to the crossing of a corrective base line (OriginPro 2022, OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA).
This analysis allowed for a comparison of the electronic structures of MNP and MNP-Q and an assessment of how chitosan coating influences the optical band gap through surface modifications and changes in nanoparticle dispersion.

3. Results

3.1. Morphological Characterization and Structural

Figure 1 shows TEM micrographs of the MNP-Q (Figure 1A,C), with spherical morphology and size distribution ranging from 10 to 12 nm. In the case of pure NPM (Figure 1B,D), a spherical morphology and size distribution between 12 and 14 nm is observed. The chitosan coating does not affect the morphology of the MNPs, but slightly affects their size. In co-precipitation synthesis, organic ions can influence metal oxide formation through two opposing mechanisms: (i) chelation of metal ions, which limits nucleation and promotes the growth of fewer, larger particles, and (ii) adsorption onto nuclei or crystal surfaces, which inhibits growth and favors smaller particle formation. In this study, the second mechanism appears predominant, leading to reduced particle size without significant changes in morphology. The chitosan coating does not affect the crystal structure of the MNP, as verified by the diffractograms in Figure 2, where the diffraction patterns of MNP and MNP-Q are equal, indicating that the crystal structure of MNP and MNP-Q is cubic centered on the faces (JCPDS No. 82-1533) [22]. The samples were prepared by taking 100 mL of the ferrofluid and then supplementing to 1000 µL, while sonicating the mixture at all times to avoid agglomeration. Once the solution had dispersed, 100 µL was taken and placed on the copper grid. Once the micrographs were obtained, they were analyzed using the Image J program and 150 images of the particles were taken for measurement using the program and histograms were generated with the data obtained, then a LogNormal was calculated to show the size distribution, which is shown in the images in Figure 1B,D.

3.2. FTIR Characterization

Infrared spectroscopy is used to verify that chitosan is found as a coating in NPM. Figure 3 shows the characteristic chitosan bands at 3352 cm−1, corresponding to the N–H bond of a primary amine and O–H; at 1591 cm−1, representing the N–H bond vibration mode; at 1354 cm−1, corresponding to methylenes and bands; and at 1027 cm−1, corresponding to C=O bonds. The corresponding band of the Fe–O bond is at 590 cm−1.

3.3. Termogravimetric Analysis

The thermogravimetric analysis (TG) in Figure 4A shows what happens to the nanoparticles if a reduction in the weight of chitosan of 40% is observed; Figure 4B shows only pure MNP without the coating, for reference.

3.4. Magnetic Properties

As is displayed in Figure 5A, the magnetic saturation for the MNP-Q sample is 53 emu/g and 51 emu/g for the pure MNP. The magnetic coercivity is 13 Oe for MNP-Q and 12 Oe for MNP, respectively, and the corresponding blocking temperatures depicted in Figure 5B are 320 and 299 K.

3.5. Optical Properties

Figure 6 reports the absorption spectra of the MNP and MNP-Q samples (chitosan added), which were measured at room temperature using a Perkin-Elmer spectrophotometer, in the spectral range 200–1600 nm and at 1 nm resolution. The black curve corresponds to the absorption spectrum of the MNP sample, while the red curve corresponds to the absorbance of the MNP-Q sample. It is worth noting that within the 200–700 nm range, the absorbance is primarily influenced by the magnetic nanoparticles, and the addition of chitosan to these nanoparticles decreases the absorbance, by reducing the MNP size. Since the synthesis method controls the final size of the nanoparticles with and without a chitosan shell, see Figure 1. The shift in the resonant interaction can be explained by two mechanisms: (a) a redshift arising from the contribution of the chitosan shell to the host medium of the MNPs, as chitosan exhibits a higher refractive index within the spectral range of the resonant interactions [23], and (b) a blueshift resulting from the ability of the chitosan shell to limit nanoparticle growth, producing smaller particle sizes. The latter mechanism appears to predominate, as evidenced by the absorbance results (Figure 6).

3.6. Band Gap

The Tauc plots were calculated from the absorption spectra of the samples (Figure 7A), using a cell length of 1 cm, and this linear model α h ν 1 γ = B ( h ν E g ) , for a direct band gap transition γ = 1 / 2 and indirect band gap transition γ = 2 . These Tauc plots, and the curves of the model with a direct band gap and the correcting base line are depicted in Figure 7B, and the band gap values obtained from the crossing of the linear model and the corrected base line are shown in Table 1.

4. Discussion

The synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles coated with chitosan (MNP-Q) demonstrated a successful approach to modulating both magnetic and optical properties of ferrofluids for potential biomedical applications. The structural analysis via XRD confirmed that both MNPs and MNP-Qs retained the typical spinel structure of magnetite, indicating that the chitosan coating does not disrupt the crystalline framework [23]. TEM analysis showed spherical morphology in both samples, with a slight reduction in average size for MNP-Qs, likely due to steric stabilization during nucleation provided by the chitosan matrix [21].
Thermogravimetric analysis revealed a significant mass loss (~40%) in the MNP-Q sample, confirming the presence of an organic chitosan layer. In contrast, the uncoated MNP sample exhibited minimal loss, attributable mainly to adsorbed moisture. This supports the effectiveness of chitosan in modifying surface chemistry and enhancing thermal responsiveness [5,20].
Magnetic measurements revealed that both samples exhibit superparamagnetic behavior, characterized by negligible magnetic remanence and coercive magnetic field and confirmed by the determination of the blocking temperatures (TB). Whereas the uncoated MNP exhibits TB = 321 K, this temperature was diminished to TB = 299 K, due to the cover of chitosan. The saturation magnetization of 53 emu/g in MNP-Q was slightly higher than that of bare MNPs (51 emu/g), possibly due to the chitosan shell preventing surface oxidation and preserving the magnetic domains [6,7,21]. The differences in magnetic saturation, remanence, and coercivity observed in the MNP-Q sample compared to the uncoated MNPs are attributed to the interaction with the chitosan biopolymer. Through electrostatic interactions involving hydroxyl and amino functional groups, chitosan enhances nanoparticle stabilization within the ferrofluid, which in turn contributes to the observed increase in magnetic properties. In simpler terms, surfactants, polymers, or biopolymers can stick to the surface of magnetic nanoparticles either chemically or physically, forming one or two protective layers around them. These layers help create a kind of “personal space” for each nanoparticle, preventing them from clumping together—mainly through a force called steric repulsion. This keeps the nanoparticles well-dispersed in liquid suspensions, which is essential for their effectiveness. Thanks to these properties, these nanoparticles are especially promising for medical uses, such as delivering drugs directly to specific areas of the body, heating tumors through magnetic hyperthermia, or serving as contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [4,8,9].
In terms of optical properties, UV-Vis spectra showed strong absorption in the UV region for both samples, with lower absorbance in the MNP-Q sample. This attenuation is likely due to changes in the refractive index and reduced aggregation caused by the chitosan shell [15,17]. The reduced absorption is also favorable for applications where optical transparency or tunability is desired, such as in biosensors or optical switches [3,16].
Band gap energy analysis using Tauc plots demonstrated a slight blue shift in MNP-Q (4.72 eV) compared to MNP (4.55 eV), indicating a modification of the electronic structure induced by surface functionalization and MNP size reduction. This result is consistent with previous reports where polymer coatings influenced surface states and quantum confinement effects in iron oxide nanoparticles [13,18,19]. The increase in Eg may also suggest that chitosan limits the formation of smaller nanoparticles (<10 nm), which are formed due to fragmentation during collisions events.
Overall, these results confirm that chitosan acts not only as a stabilizing biopolymer but also as a modulator of magnetic and optical behavior, enhancing the biocompatibility and application range of the ferrofluids [10,11,12,20]. The results further support the hypothesis that coating magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) with chitosan modifies their physicochemical, magnetic, and optical properties without altering their crystalline structure. TEM images show preserved spherical morphology with a slight size reduction in MNP-Q, while XRD analysis confirms the retention of the typical spinel structure in both samples. FTIR and TGA analyses verify the presence of the chitosan coating, and magnetization curves indicate superparamagnetic behavior, with a slight increase in saturation magnetization in MNP-Q. Additionally, UV-Vis spectacle reveals reduced absorbance in the coated sample, and Tauc plot analysis demonstrates a modest increase in band gap energy (Eg), attributed to surface modification and MNP size reduction. Together, these findings highlight the potential of the MNP-Q system for magneto-optical biomedical applications, including biosensors, smart drug delivery systems, and optical contrast agents.
The broad versatility of chitosan-coated magnetite nanoparticles (MNPs) enables their integration into multiple biomedical applications due to the combined advantages of magnetic responsiveness, biocompatibility, and tunable surface chemistry. In magnetic hyperthermia, the superparamagnetic nature of the coated MNPs allows localized heat generation under an alternating magnetic field, potentially enhancing cancer treatment while minimizing damage to surrounding tissues [24]. In targeted drug delivery, the chitosan shell provides reactive amine and hydroxyl groups for covalent or electrostatic binding of therapeutic molecules, while the magnetic core enables remote guidance to specific anatomical sites [25]. For biosensing, chitosan-coated MNPs can immobilize biomolecules such as enzymes, antibodies, or nucleic acids, enhancing detection sensitivity through magnetic concentration and improved signal transduction [26]. Additionally, the coating’s antimicrobial and mucoadhesive properties expand their potential toward wound healing materials [27] and oral or mucosal delivery systems [28]. Furthermore, their biocompatibility and hemocompatibility profiles, combined with low cytotoxicity reported in vitro, support their prospective use in regenerative medicine applications [29]. However, their clinical translation faces significant challenges, including immune surveillance, reticuloendothelial system uptake, and long-term retention in organs such as the liver and spleen, which is influenced by nanoparticle size, surface coating, and administration route [13].
This study advances our understanding of how chitosan surface functionalization influences the physicochemical stability and magneto-optical behavior of magnetite-based ferrofluids. By clarifying the relationship between nanoparticle aggregation dynamics and field-induced optical responses, our findings address a key challenge in designing ferrofluids with predictable and tunable properties. The demonstrated ability of chitosan to modulate magnetic and optical characteristics without altering the crystalline structure highlights its dual role as both a stabilizing and functionalizing agent in smart nanomaterials. Future work will include the assessment of colloidal stability and dispersion behavior in physiological solutions, which will be undertaken once the necessary equipment for zeta potential measurements becomes available. These results open new opportunities for multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles in biomedical applications such as targeted drug delivery, magnetic hyperthermia, biosensing, and theranostic platforms that integrate diagnosis and therapy. Future research should focus on biocompatibility assessment through in vitro and in vivo studies, optimization for magneto-optical biosensors, and further functionalization with specific ligands or biopolymers to expand their potential in precision medicine.

5. Conclusions

Magnetic nanoparticles coated with chitosan (MNP-Q) were successfully synthesized via the in situ co-precipitation method, yielding a stable ferrofluid in an aqueous medium. Structural analysis through X-ray diffraction confirmed a face-centered cubic spinel structure, while transmission electron microscopy revealed a spherical morphology with particle diameters ranging from 10 to 14 nm.
Magnetically, the MNP-Q sample exhibited a saturation magnetization of 53 emu/g, slightly higher than the 51 emu/g observed in uncoated MNPs. This enhancement is attributed to the protective chitosan shell, which minimizes surface oxidation and helps preserve the magnetic properties. Optical characterization disclosed a blue shift in the band gap energy from 4.55 eV (MNP) to 4.72 eV (MNP-Q), suggesting that the chitosan coating modifies the surface states and electronic structure of the nanoparticles. Moreover, Tauc analysis indicates that chitosan suppresses the formation of particles below 10 nm, influencing quantum confinement effects.
The magneto-optical properties of the chitosan-coated ferrofluid are promising, positioning this material as a potential candidate for biomedical applications such as biosensing, drug delivery, and photothermal therapy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.A.G.-R. and R.G.-C.; methodology, D.A.G.-R.; software, D.A.G.-R. and J.L.L.-M.; validation, D.A.G.-R., A.M.-G. and J.L.L.-M.; formal analysis, D.A.G.-R. and A.M.-G.; investigation, D.A.G.-R.; resources, D.A.G.-R. and C.H.W.-M.; data curation, D.A.G.-R.; writing—original draft preparation, D.A.G.-R.; writing—review and editing, D.A.G.-R. and R.G.-C.; visualization, D.A.G.-R. and M.E.C.-G.; supervision, R.G.-C.; project administration, D.A.G.-R. and R.G.-C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author(s).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the UNAM Postdoctoral Program (POSDOC). Lourdes Palma Tirado of INB-UNAM Campus Juriquilla for his support in the processing of images by TEM. Jose Luis Maldonado and Christian Albor of CIO support in DRX. Marina Vega-González of Geosciences-UNAM campus Juriquilla.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Nkurikiyimfura, I.; Wang, Y.; Pan, Z. Heat transfer enhancement by magnetic nanofluids—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 21, 548–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bahiraei, M.; Hangi, M. Flow and heat transfer characteristics of magnetic nanofluids: A review. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2015, 374, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Davies, H.W.; Llewellyn, J.P. Magnetic birefringence of ferrofluids. II. Pulsed field measurements. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 1979, 12, 1357–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Meng, Y.Q.; Shi, Y.N.; Zhu, Y.P.; Liu, Y.Q.; Gu, L.W.; Liu, D.D.; Ma, A.; Xia, F.; Guo, Q.Y.; Xu, C.C.; et al. Recent trends in preparation and biomedical applications of iron oxide nanoparticles. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2024, 22, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jiang, K.; Zhang, L.; Bao, G. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 2021, 19, 100330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vassallo, M.; Martella, D.; Barrera, G.; Celegato, F.; Coisson, M.; Ferrero, R.; Olivetti, E.S.; Troia, A.; Sozeri, H.; Parmeggiani, C.; et al. Improvement of hyperthermia properties of iron oxide nanoparticles by surface coating. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2023, 6, 1050–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rahman, M. Magnetic resonance imaging and iron-oxide nanoparticles in the era of personalized medicine. Nanotheranostics 2023, 7, 150–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lee, J.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, S.Y.; Park, S.A.; Kim, J.H.; Hwang, D.; Kim, K.A.; Kim, H.S. Antioxidant iron oxide nanoparticles: Their biocompatibility and bioactive properties. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Malhotra, N.; Lee, J.S.; Liman, R.A.D.; Ruallo, J.M.S.; Villaflores, O.B.; Ger, T.-R.; Hsiao, C.-D. Potential toxicity of iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles: A review. Molecules 2020, 25, 3159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zheng, W.; Liu, C.; Jin, J.; Sun, W.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, M.; Yao, S.; Zhu, B.; Chen, F.; Shang, J.; et al. Biodegradable iron oxide nanoparticles for intraoperative parathyroid gland imaging in thyroidectomy. PNAS Nexus 2022, 1, pgac087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Philip, J.; Laskar, J.M.; Raj, B. Magnetic field induced extinction of light in a suspension of Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 221911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shestovskaya, M.V.; Luss, A.L.; Bezborodova, O.A.; Makarov, V.V.; Keskinov, A.A. Iron oxide nanoparticles in cancer treatment: Cell responses and the potency to improve radiosensitivity. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nowak-Jary, J.; Machnicka, B. In vivo biodistribution and clearance of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for medical applications. Int. J. Nanomed. 2023, 18, 4067–4100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rablau, C.; Vaishnava, P.; Sudakar, C.; Tackett, R.; Lawes, G.; Naik, R. Magnetic-field-induced optical anisotropy in ferrofluids: A time-dependent light-scattering investigation. Phys. Rev. E 2008, 78, 051502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Philip, J.; Laskar, J.M. Optical properties and applications of ferrofluids—A review. J. Nanofluids 2012, 1, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vales-Pinzón, C.; Alvarado-Gil, J.J.; Medina-Esquivel, R.; Martínez-Torres, P. Polarized light transmission in ferrofluids loaded with carbon nanotubes in the presence of a uniform magnetic field. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2014, 369, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shulyma, S.I.; Tanygin, B.M.; Kovalenko, V.F.; Petrychuk, M.V. Magneto-optical extinction trend inversion in ferrofluids. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2016, 416, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jin, J.Y.; Song, D.X.; Geng, J.F.; Jing, D.W. Time-dependent scattering of incident light of various wavelengths in ferrofluids under external magnetic field. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2018, 447, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lakic, M.; Andjelkovic, L.; Sulijagic, M.; Vulic, P.; Peric, M.; Iskrenović, P.; Krstić, I.; Kuraica, M.M.; Nikolić, A.S. Optical evidence of magnetic field-induced ferrofluid aggregation: Comparison of cobalt ferrite, magnetite, and magnesium ferrite. Opt. Mater. 2019, 91, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dudchenko, N.; Pawar, S.; Perelshtein, I.; Fixler, D. Magnetite nanoparticles: Synthesis and applications in optics and nanophotonics. Materials 2022, 15, 2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Guzmán-Rocha, D.A.; Córdova-Fraga, T.; Bernal-Alvarado, J.J.; López, Z.; Cholico, F.A.; Quintero, L.H.; Paz, J.A.; Cano, M. A ferrofluid with high specific absorption rate prepared in a single step using a biopolymer. Materials 2022, 15, 788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Narvaez-Flores, J.J.; Vilar-Pineda, G.; Acosta-Torres, L.S.; Garcia-Contreras, R. Cytotoxic and anti-inflammatory effects of chitosan and hemostatic gelatin in oral cell culture. Acta Odontol. Latinoam. 2021, 34, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Danaei, M.; Dehghankhold, M.; Ataei, S.; Hasanzadeh Davarani, F.; Javanmard, R.; Dokhani, A. Impact of particle size and polydispersity index on the clinical applications of lipidic nanocarrier systems. Pharmaceutics 2018, 10, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hojnik Podrepšek, G.; Knez, Ž.; Leitgeb, M. Development of chitosan functionalized magnetic nanoparticles with bioactive compounds. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Osuna, Y.; Gregorio-Jauregui, K.M.; Gaona-Lozano, J.G.; de la Garza-Rodríguez, I.M.; Ilyna, A.; Barriga-Castro, E.D.; Saade, H.; López, R.G.; Zhang, R. Chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles with low chitosan content prepared in one-step. J. Nanomater. 2012, 2012, 327562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mohapatra, D.K.; Zubarev, A.; Safronov, A.; Philip, J. Reconfiguring nanostructures in magnetic fluids using ph and magnetic stimulus for tuning optical properties. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2021, 539, 168351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zamora-Mora, V.; Fernández-Gutiérrez, M.; San Román, J.; Goya, G.F.; Hernández, R.; Mijangos, C. Magnetic core–shell chitosan nanoparticles: Rheological characterization and hyperthermia application. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 102, 691–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhang, X.; Chen, F.; Ni, J. A novel method to prepare magnetite chitosan microspheres conjugated with methotrexate for controlled release of methotrexate as a magnetic targeting drug delivery system. Drug Deliv. 2009, 16, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rodrigues, N.F.M.; Neto, S.Y.; Luz, R.C.S.; Damos, F.S.; Yamanaka, H. Ultrasensitive Determination of Malathion Using Acetylcholinesterase Immobilized on Chitosan-Functionalized Magnetic Iron Nanoparticles. Biosensors 2018, 8, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. TEM images and size distribution histograms of magnetic nanoparticles. (A,B) correspond to MNP-Q, showing spherical morphology with some degree of agglomeration and a relatively uniform size distribution. (C,D) Correspond to MNP, also showing spherical nanoparticles with slightly different dispersion patterns. Scale bars: (A) 100 nm, (C) 20 nm.
Figure 1. TEM images and size distribution histograms of magnetic nanoparticles. (A,B) correspond to MNP-Q, showing spherical morphology with some degree of agglomeration and a relatively uniform size distribution. (C,D) Correspond to MNP, also showing spherical nanoparticles with slightly different dispersion patterns. Scale bars: (A) 100 nm, (C) 20 nm.
Optics 06 00046 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of MNP-Q and MNP samples. The diffraction peaks correspond to the typical spinel structure of magnetite (Fe3O4), indicating the crystalline nature of both samples. Slight differences in peak intensity and width may reflect variations in crystallite size or surface modifications.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of MNP-Q and MNP samples. The diffraction peaks correspond to the typical spinel structure of magnetite (Fe3O4), indicating the crystalline nature of both samples. Slight differences in peak intensity and width may reflect variations in crystallite size or surface modifications.
Optics 06 00046 g002
Figure 3. FT-IR spectrum of the sample composed of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) coated with chitosan. The characteristic absorption bands indicate the presence of functional groups associated with chitosan (e.g., –OH, –NH2, and C–O–C) and Fe–O stretching vibrations, confirming successful surface modification.
Figure 3. FT-IR spectrum of the sample composed of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) coated with chitosan. The characteristic absorption bands indicate the presence of functional groups associated with chitosan (e.g., –OH, –NH2, and C–O–C) and Fe–O stretching vibrations, confirming successful surface modification.
Optics 06 00046 g003
Figure 4. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of magnetic nanoparticles. (A) MNP-Q: magnetite nanoparticles coated with chitosan, showing two distinct weight loss events associated with the degradation of the chitosan layer and moisture loss. (B) MNP: uncoated magnetite nanoparticles, exhibiting a gradual weight loss primarily due to surface-adsorbed water and minor organic residues. Weight loss is plotted as a function of temperature (°C).
Figure 4. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of magnetic nanoparticles. (A) MNP-Q: magnetite nanoparticles coated with chitosan, showing two distinct weight loss events associated with the degradation of the chitosan layer and moisture loss. (B) MNP: uncoated magnetite nanoparticles, exhibiting a gradual weight loss primarily due to surface-adsorbed water and minor organic residues. Weight loss is plotted as a function of temperature (°C).
Optics 06 00046 g004
Figure 5. (A) Room temperature magnetization (M vs. H) curves for uncoated (MNP, black line) and chitosan-coated (MNP-Q, red line) magnetite nanoparticles. Both samples exhibit superparamagnetic behavior with negligible remanence and coercivity. A slight reduction in saturation magnetization is observed for MNP-Q due to the presence of the chitosan coating. (B) Respective ZFC/FC magnetization–temperature traces measured at H = 100 Oe. Arrows indicate the irreversibility temperature where the ZFC and FC branches start to diverge.
Figure 5. (A) Room temperature magnetization (M vs. H) curves for uncoated (MNP, black line) and chitosan-coated (MNP-Q, red line) magnetite nanoparticles. Both samples exhibit superparamagnetic behavior with negligible remanence and coercivity. A slight reduction in saturation magnetization is observed for MNP-Q due to the presence of the chitosan coating. (B) Respective ZFC/FC magnetization–temperature traces measured at H = 100 Oe. Arrows indicate the irreversibility temperature where the ZFC and FC branches start to diverge.
Optics 06 00046 g005
Figure 6. Optical absorption spectra of magnetic nanoparticles. UV-Vis absorption curves for uncoated magnetite nanoparticles (MNPs, black line) and chitosan-coated magnetite nanoparticles (MNP-Q, red line). Both spectra exhibit strong absorption in the UV region, with a characteristic decay in intensity towards the visible range. The slight shift and variation in absorption intensity suggest modifications in surface chemistry and dispersion due to the chitosan coating. The UV peak of the MNP sample can be attributed to the fragmentation of MNPs due to energetic collisions of the MNPs, leading to smaller size MNPs.
Figure 6. Optical absorption spectra of magnetic nanoparticles. UV-Vis absorption curves for uncoated magnetite nanoparticles (MNPs, black line) and chitosan-coated magnetite nanoparticles (MNP-Q, red line). Both spectra exhibit strong absorption in the UV region, with a characteristic decay in intensity towards the visible range. The slight shift and variation in absorption intensity suggest modifications in surface chemistry and dispersion due to the chitosan coating. The UV peak of the MNP sample can be attributed to the fragmentation of MNPs due to energetic collisions of the MNPs, leading to smaller size MNPs.
Optics 06 00046 g006
Figure 7. Tauc plots for band gap estimation of magnetic nanoparticles. (A) MNP and (B) MNP-Q samples, these plots show (αhν)2 versus photon energy () used to estimate the optical direct band gap energy (Eg). (C) MNP and (D) MNP-Q samples, these plots show (αhν)1/2 versus photon energy () used to estimate the optical indirect band gap energy (Eg). The linear portion of the curve (dashed red line) is extrapolated to intersect the x-axis, indicating the band gap energy of each sample. A shift in (Eg) is observed for MNP-Q, suggesting that the chitosan coating affects the electronic structure of the nanoparticles.
Figure 7. Tauc plots for band gap estimation of magnetic nanoparticles. (A) MNP and (B) MNP-Q samples, these plots show (αhν)2 versus photon energy () used to estimate the optical direct band gap energy (Eg). (C) MNP and (D) MNP-Q samples, these plots show (αhν)1/2 versus photon energy () used to estimate the optical indirect band gap energy (Eg). The linear portion of the curve (dashed red line) is extrapolated to intersect the x-axis, indicating the band gap energy of each sample. A shift in (Eg) is observed for MNP-Q, suggesting that the chitosan coating affects the electronic structure of the nanoparticles.
Optics 06 00046 g007
Table 1. Estimated optical band gap energy (Eg) of MNP and MNP-Q samples.
Table 1. Estimated optical band gap energy (Eg) of MNP and MNP-Q samples.
Sample E g [ e . V . ] (Direct) E g [ e . V . ] (Indirect)
MNP 4.55 ± 0.60 4.15 ± 0.76
MNP-Q 4.72 ± 0.40 4.67 ± 1.00
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guzman-Rocha, D.A.; Martinez-Gamez, A.; Lucio-Martinez, J.L.; Wiechers-Medina, C.H.; Cano-Gonzales, M.E.; Garcia-Contreras, R. Magneto-Optical Properties of a Ferrofluid with Chitosan Coating. Optics 2025, 6, 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/opt6040046

AMA Style

Guzman-Rocha DA, Martinez-Gamez A, Lucio-Martinez JL, Wiechers-Medina CH, Cano-Gonzales ME, Garcia-Contreras R. Magneto-Optical Properties of a Ferrofluid with Chitosan Coating. Optics. 2025; 6(4):46. https://doi.org/10.3390/opt6040046

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guzman-Rocha, Dulce Araceli, Alejandrina Martinez-Gamez, José Luis Lucio-Martinez, Carlos Herman Wiechers-Medina, Mario Eduardo Cano-Gonzales, and Rene Garcia-Contreras. 2025. "Magneto-Optical Properties of a Ferrofluid with Chitosan Coating" Optics 6, no. 4: 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/opt6040046

APA Style

Guzman-Rocha, D. A., Martinez-Gamez, A., Lucio-Martinez, J. L., Wiechers-Medina, C. H., Cano-Gonzales, M. E., & Garcia-Contreras, R. (2025). Magneto-Optical Properties of a Ferrofluid with Chitosan Coating. Optics, 6(4), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/opt6040046

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop