Evaluating the Impact of Controlled Ultraviolet Light Intensities on the Growth of Kale Using IoT-Based Systems
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- To determine the impact of controlled UV light intensities on the growth of kale in an indoor environment. The authors hypothesize that the precise regulation of UV light exposure throughout the growth stages of kale will enhance both growth rates and health benefits.
- To provide actionable insights for indoor farming practices, contributing valuable knowledge to the broader domain of agricultural sciences and advancing the goals of sustainable agriculture and resource efficiency using IoT technology.
- To address existing agricultural obstacles in controlled environments by implementing sophisticated IoT technologies, optimizing and mechanizing agricultural processes to make indoor farming more adaptable, efficient, and aligned with the requirements of contemporary agricultural production.
2. Theoretical Background
2.1. Indoor Kale Cultivation
2.2. IoT in Agriculture
2.3. Role of UV Light in Plant Growth
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. IoT-Based Kale Cultivation Architecture
3.2. Material Design
3.3. Experimental Setting and Procedure
3.4. Data Collection
3.5. Data Analysis
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Analysis Results
4.2. Discussion
4.2.1. Theoretical Contributions
4.2.2. Benefits and Limitations of Indoor IoT-Controlled UV LED lights
4.2.3. Future Work
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Statistic | Plot Number | Light Intensity (lux) | Height (cm) | Average Width Leaf Size (cm) | Average Length Leaf Size (cm) | Average Width Branch Size (cm) | Average Length Branch Size (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Count | 45 | 45 | 45 | 45 | 45 | 45 | 45 |
Mean | 2.00 | 6535.76 | 13.66 | 8.39 | 10.65 | 17.54 | 21.02 |
Std | 0.83 | 3070.64 | 5.82 | 2.29 | 3.11 | 5.87 | 5.81 |
Min | 1.00 | 1826.00 | 3.00 | 3.50 | 4.17 | 5.00 | 7.33 |
25% | 1.00 | 4340.00 | 10.00 | 7.17 | 9.00 | 13.67 | 18.00 |
50% | 2.00 | 7128.00 | 13.00 | 8.67 | 10.67 | 18.00 | 21.00 |
75% | 3.00 | 8573.00 | 16.00 | 9.83 | 12.83 | 21.00 | 25.33 |
Max | 3.00 | 13,136.00 | 29.00 | 13.67 | 16.33 | 27.67 | 33.50 |
Experimental Group | Plot Number | Light Intensity (lux) | Height (cm) | Average Width Leaf Size (cm) | Average Length Leaf Size (cm) | Average Width Branch Size (cm) | Average Length Branch Size (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1-1 | 1 | 1826 | 6.0 | 5.83 | 7.00 | 10.33 | 15.00 |
T1-1 | 2 | 1968 | 6.5 | 4.17 | 4.67 | 8.67 | 11.67 |
T1-1 | 3 | 2005 | 7.0 | 5.83 | 6.17 | 11.83 | 16.33 |
T1-2 | 1 | 1946 | 7.0 | 5.83 | 7.83 | 8.83 | 12.67 |
T1-2 | 2 | 2302 | 8.0 | 4.83 | 5.83 | 10.83 | 15.17 |
T1-2 | 3 | 1997 | 3.0 | 3.50 | 4.17 | 5.00 | 7.33 |
T1-3 | 1 | 2130 | 7.0 | 5.33 | 7.00 | 11.67 | 14.33 |
T1-3 | 2 | 2236 | 6.0 | 4.67 | 6.17 | 7.50 | 11.50 |
T1-3 | 3 | 2294 | 7.0 | 5.67 | 6.17 | 8.50 | 10.67 |
T2-1 | 1 | 7505 | 16.0 | 11.50 | 12.83 | 21.67 | 23.33 |
T2-1 | 2 | 10,101 | 15.0 | 8.50 | 9.17 | 19.83 | 20.67 |
T2-1 | 3 | 10,440 | 11.0 | 7.50 | 9.00 | 16.5 | 18.67 |
T2-2 | 1 | 4335 | 17.0 | 9.67 | 10.50 | 20.67 | 23.83 |
T2-2 | 2 | 5567 | 28.0 | 13.67 | 14.50 | 27.67 | 33.50 |
T2-2 | 3 | 5800 | 16.0 | 9.83 | 10.67 | 13.12 | 25.33 |
T2-3 | 1 | 9417 | 11.0 | 7.17 | 9.67 | 14.67 | 18.00 |
T2-3 | 2 | 13,136 | 12.0 | 9.83 | 12.33 | 20.50 | 23.33 |
T2-3 | 3 | 12,944 | 13.0 | 8.83 | 11.00 | 15.67 | 20.33 |
T3-1 | 1 | 7638 | 14.0 | 9.00 | 12.17 | 19.83 | 23.00 |
T3-1 | 2 | 8248 | 19.0 | 11.83 | 13.33 | 26.50 | 27.67 |
T3-1 | 3 | 7709 | 14.0 | 10.83 | 12.33 | 22.33 | 25.33 |
T3-2 | 1 | 5247 | 23.0 | 9.17 | 15.17 | 23.33 | 29.00 |
T3-2 | 2 | 5254 | 22.0 | 12.33 | 16.33 | 24.83 | 26.00 |
T3-2 | 3 | 4883 | 22.0 | 9.83 | 13.33 | 24.83 | 28.00 |
T3-3 | 1 | 9390 | 29.0 | 9.83 | 15.33 | 27.67 | 29.00 |
T3-3 | 2 | 11,202 | 24.0 | 10.17 | 14.83 | 26.67 | 29.50 |
T3-3 | 3 | 9659 | 20.0 | 10.00 | 14.67 | 24.00 | 26.20 |
T3-4 | 1 | 9465 | 11.0 | 8.33 | 10.50 | 18.50 | 20.33 |
T3-4 | 2 | 8573 | 16.0 | 11.67 | 15.50 | 26.33 | 30.00 |
T3-4 | 3 | 9627 | 14.0 | 9.33 | 13.67 | 21.00 | 27.00 |
T3-5 | 1 | 7864 | 13.0 | 7.67 | 9.83 | 17.33 | 22.00 |
T3-5 | 2 | 7649 | 12.0 | 10.5 | 14.33 | 19.83 | 24.00 |
T3-5 | 3 | 7209 | 14.0 | 8.00 | 11.00 | 19.33 | 22.50 |
T3-6 | 1 | 5711 | 10.0 | 8.50 | 10.83 | 20.00 | 20.00 |
T3-6 | 2 | 5330 | 11.0 | 8.67 | 9.50 | 13.83 | 21.00 |
T3-6 | 3 | 5305 | 18.0 | 7.17 | 10.50 | 14.33 | 19.33 |
T3-7 | 1 | 4757 | 11.0 | 8.83 | 10.33 | 15.67 | 19.33 |
T3-7 | 2 | 4340 | 14.0 | 8.17 | 11.00 | 18.00 | 18.67 |
T3-7 | 3 | 4132 | 14.0 | 9.50 | 11.33 | 15.83 | 22.50 |
T3-8 | 1 | 8975 | 13.0 | 9.00 | 10.17 | 16.17 | 20.67 |
T3-8 | 2 | 7128 | 9.0 | 6.17 | 7.67 | 13.67 | 15.83 |
T3-8 | 3 | 8174 | 15.0 | 8.83 | 11.33 | 18.67 | 21.17 |
T3-9 | 1 | 8420 | 9.0 | 5.17 | 7.17 | 10.67 | 13.33 |
T3-9 | 2 | 7243 | 15.0 | 8.33 | 12.50 | 20.00 | 22.50 |
T3-9 | 3 | 7028 | 12.0 | 8.50 | 10.00 | 16.83 | 20.50 |
References
- Pawlak, K.; Kołodziejczak, M. The role of agriculture in ensuring food security in developing countries: Considerations in the context of the problem of sustainable food production. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alfawaz, H.A.; Wani, K.; Alrakayan, H.; Alnaami, A.M.; Al-Daghri, N.M. Awareness, knowledge and attitude towards ‘superfood’ kale and its health benefits among Arab adults. Nutrients 2022, 14, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, J.; Jiang, H.; Li, Y.; He, R.; Liu, K.; Chen, Y.; He, X.; Liu, X.; Liu, H. Growth, phytochemicals, and antioxidant activity of kale grown under different nutrient-solution depths in hydroponic. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roussos, P.A. Climate change challenges in temperate and sub-tropical fruit tree cultivation. Encyclopedia 2024, 4, 558–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chowdhury, M.; Kiraga, S.; Islam, M.N.; Ali, M.; Reza, M.N.; Lee, W.-H.; Chung, S.-O. Effects of temperature, relative humidity, and carbon dioxide concentration on growth and glucosinolate content of kale grown in a plant factory. Foods 2021, 10, 1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, S.; Spaccarotella, K.; Gido, J.; Samanta, I.; Chowdhary, G. Effects of heat stress on plant-nutrient relations: An update on nutrient uptake, transport, and assimilation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wanwimolruk, S.; Kanchanamayoon, O.; Phopin, K.; Prachayasittikul, V. Food Safety in Thailand 2: Pesticide Residues Found in Chinese Kale (Brassica Oleracea), a Commonly Consumed Vegetable in Asian Countries. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 532, 447–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reda, T.; Thavarajah, P.; Polomski, R.; Bridges, W.; Shipe, E.; Thavarajah, D. Reaching the highest shelf: A review of organic production, nutritional quality, and shelf life of kale (Brassica oleracea var. Acephala). Plants People Planet 2021, 3, 308–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niswar, M. Design and implementation of an automated indoor hydroponic farming system based on the internet of things. Int. J. Comput. Digit. Syst. 2024, 15, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bunpalwong, M.; Rukhiran, M.; Netinant, P. Improving marigold agriculture with an IoT-driven greenhouse irrigation management control system. Bull. Electr. Eng. Inform. 2023, 12, 3817–3825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahari, M.; Arpaci, I.; Der, O.; Akkoyun, F.; Ercetin, A. Driving agricultural transformation: Unraveling key factors shaping IoT adoption in smart farming with empirical insights. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verdouw, C.; Sundmaeker, H.; Tekinerdogan, B.; Conzon, D.; Montanaro, T. Architecture framework of IoT-based food and farm systems: A multiple case study. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019, 165, 104939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rukhiran, M.; Sutanthavibul, C.; Boonsong, S.; Netinant, P. IoT-based mushroom cultivation system with solar renewable energy integration: Assessing the sustainable impact of the yield and quality. Sustainability 2023, 15, 13968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rukhiran, M.; Netinant, P. Mobile application development of hydroponic smart farm using information flow diagram. In Proceedings of the 2020—5th International Conference on Information Technology, Chonburi, Thailand, 21–22 October 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhanaraju, M.; Chenniappan, P.; Ramalingam, K.; Pazhanivelan, S.; Kaliaperumal, R. Smart farming: Internet of things (IoT)-based sustainable agriculture. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalia, P.; Ansari, M.A. IoT based air quality and particulate matter concentration monitoring system. Mater. Today 2020, 32, 468–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rathod, N.; Panigrahi, S.; Pinjarkar, V. Smart farming: IoT based smart sensor agriculture stick for live temperature and humidity monitoring. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 664–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finecomess, S.A.; Gebresenbet, G.; Alwan, H.M. Utilizing an internet of things (IoT) device, intelligent control design, and simulation for an agricultural system. IoT 2024, 5, 58–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Obaideen, K.; Yousef, B.A.A.; AlMallahi, M.N.; Tan, Y.C.; Mahmoud, M.; Jaber, H.; Ramadan, M. An Overview of smart irrigation systems using IoT. Energy Nexus 2022, 7, 100124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; Yang, Z.; Liu, Y. Internet-of-things-based multiple-sensor monitoring system for soil information diagnosis using a smartphone. Micromachines 2023, 14, 1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rajak, P.; Ganguly, A.; Adhikary, S.; Bhattacharya, S. Internet of things and smart sensors in agriculture: Scopes and challenges. J. Agric. Food Res. 2023, 14, 100776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, H.; Di, L.; Guo, L.; Zhang, C.; Lin, L. An automated data-driven irrigation scheduling approach using model simulated soil moisture and evapotranspiration. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, M.R.; Oliullah, K.; Kabir, M.M.; Alom, M.; Mridha, M.F. Machine learning enabled IoT system for soil nutrients monitoring and crop recommendation. J. Agric. Food Res. 2023, 14, 100880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donzia, S.K.Y.; Yeo, H.; Kim, H.-K. Design and evaluation of soil pH IoT sensor attribute for rice agriculture in central Africa. In Applied Computing and Information Technology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 37–47. [Google Scholar]
- Pereira, G.P.; Chaari, M.Z.; Daroge, F. IoT-enabled smart drip irrigation system using ESP32. IoT 2023, 4, 221–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spachos, P. Towards a low-cost precision viticulture system using internet of things devices. IoT 2020, 1, 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varalakshmi, P.; Sivashakthivadhani, B.Y.; Sakthiram, B.L. Automatic plant escalation monitoring system using IoT. In Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Computing and Communications Technologies, Chennai, India, 21–22 February 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prabhakar, L.C.; Merina, R.D.; Mani, V. IoT based air quality monitoring and plant disease detection for agriculture. Autom. Contr. Comput. Sci. 2023, 57, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wongprasadpetch, S.; Manowan, P.; Srisot, C.; Boongoen, T.; Yooyativong, T.; Chansareewittaya, S. Monitoring system platform for agricultural research and analysis. J. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2020, 10, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tachai, N.; Yato, P.; Muangpan, T.; Srijiranon, K.; Eiamkanitchat, N. KaleCare: Smart farm for kale with pests detection system using machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2021 16th International Joint Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing, Ayutthaya, Thailand, 21–23 December 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, H.; Guo, W.; Liu, C.; Sun, X. A study of kale recognition based on semantic segmentation. Agronomy 2024, 14, 894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, H.; Li, Y.; He, R.; Tan, J.; Liu, K.; Chen, Y.; Liu, H. Effect of supplemental UV-A intensity on growth and quality of kale under red and blue light. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahamed, M.S.; Sultan, M.; Monfet, D.; Rahman, M.S.; Zhang, Y.; Zahid, A.; Bilal, M.; Ahsan, T.M.A.; Achour, Y. A Critical Review on efficient thermal environment controls in indoor vertical farming. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 425, 138923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, G.-J.; Heo, J.-W.; Jung, C.-R.; Kim, H.-H.; Jo, J.-S.; Lee, J.-G.; Lee, G.-J.; Nam, S.-Y.; Hong, E.-Y. Effects of artificial light sources on growth and glycosylate contents of hydroponically grown kale in plant factory. Prot. Hortic. Plant Fact. 2016, 25, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Zhou, B.; Teng, Z.; Zhang, M.; Yu, L.; Luo, Y.; Chen, P.; Sun, J. Improved metabolomic approach for evaluation of phytochemicals in mustard, kale, and broccoli microgreens under different controlled environment agriculture conditions. J. Agric. Food Res. 2023, 14, 100719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, A.; Hazarika, M.; Heisnam, P.; Pandey, H.; Devadas, V.S.; Wangsu, M. Controlled environment ecosystem: A plant growth system to combat climate change through soilless culture. Crop Design 2024, 3, 100044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- How to Grow Kale from Seed for a Nutritious Harvest All Year Round. Available online: https://sowrightseeds.com/blogs/planters-library/how-to-grow-kale-from-seed-all-year-round (accessed on 16 April 2024).
- Stein, E.W. The transformative environmental effects large-scale indoor farming may have on air, water, and soil. Air Soil Water Res. 2021, 14, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carotti, L.; Pistillo, A.; Zauli, I.; Meneghello, D.; Martin, M.; Pennisi, G.; Gianquinto, G.; Orsini, F. Improving water use efficiency in vertical farming: Effects of growing systems, far-red radiation and planting density on lettuce cultivation. Agric. Water Manag. 2023, 285, 108365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- How to Grow and Care for Kale. Available online: https://www.picturethisai.com/care/Brassica_oleracea_var._viridis.html (accessed on 16 April 2024).
- Satheesh, N.; Workneh Fanta, S. Kale: Review on nutritional composition, bio-active compounds, anti-nutritional factors, health beneficial properties and value-added products. Cogent Food Agric. 2020, 6, 1811048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veggie Temperature Tolerances-Grow Veggies & Fruits. Available online: https://www.deep-roots-project.org/grow-your-own-food-all/veggie-temperature-tolerances (accessed on 16 April 2024).
- How to Grow Kale at Home: Expert Advice & Methods. Available online: https://mygardyn.com/grow-kale/ (accessed on 16 April 2024).
- Puccinelli, M.; Maggini, R.; Angelini, L.G.; Santin, M.; Landi, M.; Tavarini, S.; Castagna, A.; Incrocci, L. Can light spectrum composition increase growth and nutritional quality of Linum usitatissimum L. sprouts and microgreens? Horticulturae 2022, 8, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sehgal, A.; Reddy, K.R.; Walne, C.H.; Barickman, T.C.; Brazel, S.; Chastain, D.; Gao, W. Climate stressors on growth, yield, and functional biochemistry of two brassica species, kale and mustard. Life 2022, 12, 1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Growing Kale in West Virginia. Available online: https://extension.wvu.edu/lawn-gardening-pests/gardening/wv-garden-guide/growing-kale-in-west-virginia (accessed on 16 April 2024).
- Morchid, A.; El Alami, R.; Raezah, A.A.; Sabbar, Y. Applications of internet of things (IoT) and sensors technology to increase food security and agricultural sustainability: Benefits and challenges. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2024, 15, 102509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Qiao, X.; Wang, Y.; Yu, H.; Mu, C. IoT-based system of prevention and control for crop diseases and insect pests. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1323074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nayagam, M.G.; Vijayalakshmi, B.; Somasundaram, K.; Mukunthan, M.A.; Yogaraja, C.A.; Partheeban, P. Control of pests and diseases in plants using IoT technology. Measur. Sens. 2023, 26, 100713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, R.P.; Dharavath, R.; Edla, D.R. IoFT-FIS: Internet of farm things based prediction for crop pest infestation using optimized fuzzy inference system. Internet Things 2023, 21, 100658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuentes-Peñailillo, F.; Gutter, K.; Vega, R.; Silva, G.C. New generation sustainable technologies for soilless vegetable production. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, M.; Abdelsalam, M.; Khorsandroo, S.; Mittal, S. Security and privacy in smart farming: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 34564–34584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamsal, R.R.; Karthikeyan, P.; Otero, P.; Ariza, A. Design and implementation of internet of things (IoT) platform targeted for smallholder farmers: From Nepal perspective. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, A.A.; Faheem, M.; Bashir, R.N.; Wechtaisong, C.; Abbas, M.Z. Internet of Things (IoT) Assisted Context Aware Fertilizer Recommendation. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 129505–129519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohanty, A.K.; Rao, T.K.; Harisha, K.S.; Agme, R.; Gogoi, C. IoT applications for livestock management and health monitoring in modern farming. Educ. Adm. Theory Pract. 2024, 30, 2141–2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Technologies in the Field. Available online: https://www.boi.go.th/upload/content/TIR7_Aw_Smart%20farming_5e5dc88fa8284.pdf (accessed on 16 April 2024).
- Farooq, M.S.; Riaz, S.; Abid, A.; Umer, T.; Zikria, Y.B. Role of IoT technology in agriculture: A systematic literature review. Electronics 2020, 9, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vanhaelewyn, L.; Van Der Straeten, D.; De Coninck, B.; Vandenbussche, F. Ultraviolet radiation from a plant perspective: The plant-microorganism context. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 597642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yoon, H.I.; Kim, J.; Son, J.E. Evaluation of UV-B lighting design for phenolic production in kale plants using optical simulation with three-dimensional plant models in plant factories. Biosyst. Eng. 2022, 221, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Y.; Li, X.; He, X.; He, R.; Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Liu, H. Effects of pre-harvest supplemental UV-A light on growth and quality of chinese kale. Molecules 2022, 27, 7763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kataria, S.; Jajoo, A.; Guruprasad, K.N. Impact of increasing ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation on photosynthetic processes. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2014, 137, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, R.; Gao, M.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Song, S.; Su, W.; Liu, H. Supplemental UV-A affects growth and antioxidants of chinese kale baby-leaves in artificial light plant factory. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, K.; Gao, M.; Jiang, H.; Ou, S.; Li, X.; He, R.; Li, Y.; Liu, H. Light intensity and photoperiod affect growth and nutritional quality of brassica microgreens. Molecules 2022, 27, 883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pathirana, I.; Thavarajah, P.; Siva, N.; Wickramasinghe, A.N.K.; Smith, P.; Thavarajah, D. Moisture deficit effects on kale (Brassica oleracea L. var. Acephala) biomass, mineral, and low molecular weight carbohydrate concentrations. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 226, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frąszczak, B.; Kula-Maximenko, M.; Podsędek, A.; Sosnowska, D.; Unegbu, K.C.; Spiżewski, T. Morphological and photosynthetic parameters of green and red kale microgreens cultivated under different light spectra. Plants 2023, 12, 3800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, J.; Moallem, M.; Zhengi, Y. An intelligent IoT-enabled lighting system for energy-efficient crop production. J. Daylighting 2021, 8, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasyer, M.A.; Khalid, A.M.; Neranjan, N.; Belayan, J.; Metali, F.; Yassin, H.; Bakar, M.S.A. IoT-powered pest management system for chili plants: Analyzing the effects of various light spectrum towards pest and plant health. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Science and Data Engineering, Nadi, Fiji, 4–6 December 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rukhiran, M.; Buaroong, S.; Netinant, P. Software development for educational information services using multilayering semantics adaptation. Int. J. Serv. Sci. Manag. Eng. Technol. 2022, 13, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rukhiran, M.; Wong-In, S.; Netinant, P. IoT-based biometric recognition systems in education for identity verification services: Quality assessment approach. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 22767–22787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Factor Concerns | Description |
---|---|
Soil and nutrition [40,41] | Kale thrives in well-drained, fertile environments with a pH between 6.0 and 7.5. In indoor hydroponics, soil is replaced with nutrient solutions or inert substrates such as coco coir or rock wool. Nutrients must include essential elements like nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, and magnesium. |
Temperature [42] | Optimal growth occurs at temperatures between 60 and 70 °F (15 and 21 °C). Kale can tolerate cooler temperatures and light frosts, but high temperatures above 80 °F (27 °C) can lead to bolting, which affects leaf flavor and texture. |
Humidity [5,43] | The ideal relative humidity is between 60 and 70%. Excessive humidity can increase the risk of fungal diseases like powdery mildew, hence the need for good ventilation and air circulation to manage humidity effectively. |
Light intensity [44] | Kale requires high light intensity, which is best provided by LED or fluorescent grow lights mimicking the full sun. The daily light requirement is about 12–16 h, focusing on the blue and red parts of the light spectrum. |
UV levels [32,45] | UV light enhances kale’s nutritional content by boosting the synthesis of vitamins and antioxidants. The optimal UV exposure needs careful management to avoid plant tissue damage while enhancing plant stress responses that benefit growth. |
Growing cycle [46] | Depending on the variety and conditions, kale generally takes 55 to 75 days from seed to harvest. Indoor systems can accelerate this cycle. Kale allows for progressive harvesting by clipping outer leaves, letting the inner leaves continue to grow. |
Factor Concerns | Description |
---|---|
Microcontroller compatibility [9,10,11,12,13,14,15] | IoT devices must be compatible with microcontrollers that offer sufficient computational power, energy efficiency, and connectivity options to handle real-time data processing. |
Automated control [10,13] | Systems require robust algorithms and reliable actuators for timely adjustments based on sensor data, which is crucial for managing irrigation systems and climate controls in greenhouses. |
Data logging and processing [54] | Effective data logging is essential for tracking long-term trends, while advanced processing capabilities are needed for predictive analytics and optimizing responses. |
Network stability and connectivity [53] | Stable network connections are critical to ensure continuous data transmission and system reliability, especially in remote or rural areas where connectivity issues occur. |
Energy efficiency and management [13] | IoT devices and systems must optimize energy use to enhance sustainability and reduce operating costs, particularly in large-scale deployments. |
User training and support [55] | Adequate training for farm personnel on IoT system operation and troubleshooting is necessary to maximize the benefits and minimize disruptions in agricultural processes. |
Scalability of IoT solutions [56] | The ability to scale IoT solutions efficiently as the farm grows or as new technologies emerge is crucial for the long-term viability and expansion of IoT applications in agriculture. |
Regulatory compliance [57] | IoT implementations must comply with local and international regulations regarding technology use in agriculture, which can vary significantly by region. |
Factor Concern | Requirement of IoT-Enabled Cultivation Process |
---|---|
UV light intensity [63] | Precise management of UV light intensity is required. An inadequate amount will fail to elicit the plant’s intended responses, whereas an excessive amount may result in detrimental consequences like leaf scorching and stunted development. Adjustable systems regulate intensity following plant growth stages and environmental conditions. |
Duration of exposure [64] | Additionally, the duration of UV light exposure must be strictly regulated. Prolonged exposure has the potential to cause harm. Therefore, it is recommended that IoT systems be programmed to regulate light periods by daily and seasonal demands. |
UV light wavelength [62] | Variations in UV wavelength have distinct impacts on plant physiology. It is of utmost importance to dynamically adjust specific wavelengths emitted by UV light sources. In this regard, IoT systems can provide valuable assistance by continuously monitoring plant health. |
Plant developmental stage [62,65] | UV light sensitivity is dependent on the plant’s developmental stage. Younger plants may be more susceptible to UV damage; therefore, variable light management strategies that adjust as the plants develop may be required. |
Environmental interactions [25,26] | UV light interacts with other environmental elements, including temperature and humidity. IoT systems must integrate data from all environmental sensors to optimize UV exposure while preventing the exacerbation of stress conditions. |
System integration and automation [25,26] | Communication between devices and sensors must be seamless for agricultural IoT systems to incorporate UV light management. Automated control systems must possess robustness and dependability to manage these intricacies effectively. |
Energy consumption [66] | UV lighting systems may require considerable amounts of energy. Succinct energy management that balances energy consumption and agricultural gains necessitates revolutionary IoT solutions. |
Component | Description | |
---|---|---|
Hardware | Raspberry Pi 4 (8 GB RAM) | The Raspberry Pi is designed with considerable processing power and ample memory capacity to facilitate integration with various sensors, IoT devices, and data streams. Functioning as the primary processing unit to oversee numerous signals simultaneously, it permits data processing in real time across a wide range of applications. |
Temperature and humidity sensor (RS485) | RS485 signals are generated from the environmental temperature and humidity sensors by employing a dependable digital processing circuit and a superior-quality industrial-grade integrated transducer. | |
Four-channel relay | A relay with four channels is a device that incorporates four discrete relay switches in a single unit. Each relay switch can autonomously regulate the establishment or termination of an electrical circuit. | |
Solenoid valve | A solenoid valve is an electromechanical apparatus that regulates water flow within a system. Applying an electric current to the solenoid induces the generation of a magnetic field, which in turn causes the movement of the plunger. This movement can either open or close a valve mechanism. | |
Pump | A pump is a mechanical apparatus that transfers water from a water reservoir to plots of kale. | |
Drip emitters | Drip emitters transport water directly to plants referred to as water drops. | |
Water tank | A water tank is a receptacle utilized for water storage. | |
Air conditioner | An air conditioner is a device that manages and adjusts the temperature, humidity, and overall air quality in an indoor space. | |
LED UV source | Lighting technology has significantly advanced, offering a wide range of LED sources. Every light source possesses distinct attributes of energy efficiency, color rendition, longevity, and ecological footprint. The following light sources were used:
| |
Soil moisture sensor detector | The design is based on the LM393 and is used to detect and measure moisture humidity levels. | |
Operating system | Raspbian OS 64-bit kernel 6.6 | The software is specifically designed to maximize performance on Raspberry Pi hardware, allowing for efficient multitasking and compatibility with a wide range of libraries necessary for integrating sensors, controlling relays, managing lights, operating solenoid valves, and controlling air systems. |
Variable | Sum of Squares | Degrees of Freedom (DF) | F-Statistic | p-Value | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Light intensity (lux) | 393362200 | 14, 30 | 39.19 | 0.000 | Highly significant |
Height (cm) | 1215.74 | 14, 30 | 9.54 | 0.000 | Highly significant |
Average width leaf size (cm) | 168.05 | 14, 30 | 5.78 | 0.000 | Highly significant |
Average length leaf size (cm) | 341.42 | 14, 30 | 8.60 | 0.000 | Highly significant |
Average width branch size (cm) | 1195.09 | 14, 30 | 7.94 | 0.000 | Highly significant |
Average length branch size (cm) | 1208.96 | 14, 30 | 9.35 | 0.000 | Highly significant |
Experimental Group | Average Height (cm) | Average Leaf Size (cm) | Average Branch Size (cm) | Total Score | Impact Explanation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T3-3 (household daylight and indoor 4000 K grow lights) | 24.33 | 12.47 | 27.17 | 63.98 | Highest scores across all parameters suggest optimal light and nutrient conditions, potentially including enhanced UV light exposure, promoting robust growth and larger biomass accumulation. |
T3-2 (household warm white and indoor grow red lights) | 22.33 | 12.69 | 25.99 | 61.03 | Slightly lower height but greater leaf size may indicate a balance between light intensity and quality, with conditions fostering broad leaf development beneficial for photosynthetic efficiency. |
T2-2 (Indoor grow red lights) | 20.33 | 11.47 | 24.02 | 55.83 | Lower scores in all categories could reflect less intensive light conditions or suboptimal nutrient availability, impacting overall growth rates and structural development. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Klongdee, S.; Netinant, P.; Rukhiran, M. Evaluating the Impact of Controlled Ultraviolet Light Intensities on the Growth of Kale Using IoT-Based Systems. IoT 2024, 5, 449-477. https://doi.org/10.3390/iot5020021
Klongdee S, Netinant P, Rukhiran M. Evaluating the Impact of Controlled Ultraviolet Light Intensities on the Growth of Kale Using IoT-Based Systems. IoT. 2024; 5(2):449-477. https://doi.org/10.3390/iot5020021
Chicago/Turabian StyleKlongdee, Suttipong, Paniti Netinant, and Meennapa Rukhiran. 2024. "Evaluating the Impact of Controlled Ultraviolet Light Intensities on the Growth of Kale Using IoT-Based Systems" IoT 5, no. 2: 449-477. https://doi.org/10.3390/iot5020021
APA StyleKlongdee, S., Netinant, P., & Rukhiran, M. (2024). Evaluating the Impact of Controlled Ultraviolet Light Intensities on the Growth of Kale Using IoT-Based Systems. IoT, 5(2), 449-477. https://doi.org/10.3390/iot5020021