Next Article in Journal
Comparative Evaluation of Deep Learning Architectures for Non-Destructive Estimation of Carotenoid Content from Visible–Near-Infrared (400–850 nm) Spectral Reflectance Data
Next Article in Special Issue
Deep Learning for Hourly FAO-56 PM-Derived Crop Evapotranspiration Estimation Using a Transformer Encoder Approach for Data-Driven Irrigation Management in Tropical Horticulture
Previous Article in Journal
Nitrogen Dynamics and Environmental Sustainability in Rice–Crab Co-Culture System: Optimal Fertilization for Sustainable Productivity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Expanding Innovation in Agriculture: Case Study on Adoptable Technologies Using GenAI Based on Traditional Knowledge Management
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Sustainable Development in Agriculture and Allied Sectors of the Temperate Himalayas

1
Centre of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (CAIML), Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir (SKUAST-K), Srinagar 190025, India
2
Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
AgriEngineering 2026, 8(1), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering8010035
Submission received: 22 October 2025 / Revised: 18 December 2025 / Accepted: 5 January 2026 / Published: 19 January 2026

Abstract

The temperate Himalayan states of Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Ladakh, Sikkim, and Arunachal Pradesh in India face unique agro-ecological challenges across agriculture and allied sectors, including pest and disease pressures, inefficient resource use, post-harvest losses, and fragmented supply chains. This review systematically examines 21 critical problem areas, with three key challenges identified per sector across agriculture, agricultural engineering, fisheries, forestry, horticulture, sericulture, and animal husbandry. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) interventions, including computer vision, predictive modeling, Internet of Things (IoT)-based monitoring, robotics, and blockchain-enabled traceability, are evaluated for their regional applicability, pilot-level outcomes, and operational limitations under temperate Himalayan conditions. The analysis highlights that AI-enabled solutions demonstrate strong potential for early pest and disease detection, improved resource-use efficiency, ecosystem monitoring, and market integration. However, large-scale adoption remains constrained by limited digital infrastructure, data scarcity, high capital costs, low digital literacy, and fragmented institutional frameworks. The novelty of this review lies in its cross-sectoral synthesis of AI/ML applications tailored to the Himalayan context, combined with a sector-wise revenue-loss assessment to quantify economic impacts and guide prioritization. Based on the identified gaps, the review proposes feasible, context-aware strategies, including lightweight edge-AI models, localized data platforms, capacity-building initiatives, and policy-aligned implementation pathways. Collectively, these recommendations aim to enhance sustainability, resilience, and livelihood security across agriculture and allied sectors in the temperate Himalayan region.

1. Introduction

The temperate Himalayan region encompasses steep terrain, fragmented landholdings, microclimatic variability, and limited infrastructure. Seven allied sectors, namely agriculture, agricultural engineering, fisheries, forestry, horticulture, sericulture, and animal husbandry, play pivotal roles in regional livelihoods, yet face shared constraints such as pest and disease pressures, inefficient resource use, post-harvest losses, and supply chain fragmentation. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) hold promise in addressing these challenges through early detection, predictive analytics, automated monitoring, and optimized logistics.
ML approaches, including computer vision, predictive modeling, Internet of Things (IoT)-based monitoring, robotics, and blockchain-enabled traceability, have already been applied across agricultural and allied domains and are particularly promising for region-specific adaptation [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. However, in the Himalayan context, these systems often remain siloed, pilot-oriented, and heavily dependent on cloud-based infrastructure, limiting their scalability and real-time usability.
The major contributions and scope of the present review, including the core objectives, novelty, and key challenges addressed, are summarized in Table 1. Specifically, this review integrates cross-sectoral insights, systematically examines 21 critical problem areas across allied sectors, quantifies sector-wise revenue losses, and proposes a cohesive, policy-aligned roadmap for sustainable technology adoption in the temperate Himalayan region.
The temperate Himalayan states encompass diverse agroecological zones where traditional farming practices intersect with emerging technological interventions. These regions contribute significantly to India’s agricultural diversity by producing specialty crops such as saffron, walnuts, and apples, and by sustaining unique livestock breeds adapted to high-altitude conditions. However, climate change, market volatility, and persistent resource constraints pose increasing challenges to long-term sustainability across these sectors [13,14,15,16].
Recent studies indicate that climatic parameters, soil characteristics, and historical outbreak data are increasingly used to forecast pest emergence events, enabling proactive and localized management strategies tailored to Himalayan microclimates. Pilot applications in Himachal Pradesh have reported detection accuracies of up to 90% for apple scab and codling moth identification [17]. Nevertheless, such systems often rely heavily on cloud-based servers, resulting in latency issues in low-connectivity mountainous terrains. Similarly, weather-based orchard forecasting models deployed in Jammu have demonstrated potential for predicting pest outbreaks and supporting timely interventions [18], yet their broader effectiveness remains constrained by the lack of region-specific labeled datasets required for generalization across diverse Himalayan microclimates.
Accordingly, the primary objective of this review is to critically synthesize existing AI and ML applications across agriculture and allied sectors in the temperate Himalayas, identify unresolved challenges and cross-sectoral gaps, and propose feasible, context-aware implementation pathways to support sustainable development and livelihood resilience.

2. Materials and Methods

This review adopts a sector-wise analytical framework to evaluate the potential of AI and ML for advancing sustainable development across agriculture and allied sectors in the temperate Himalayan region of India. The analysis encompasses seven sectors: agriculture, agricultural engineering, fisheries, forestry, horticulture, sericulture, and animal husbandry. This structure enables cross-sectoral comparison while retaining sensitivity to sector-specific challenges and operational contexts.
A structured literature review approach was employed to collect and synthesize relevant studies published between 2015 and 2025. Peer-reviewed journal articles were primarily identified through academic databases including Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, using combinations of keywords such as “artificial intelligence”, “machine learning”, “precision agriculture”, “pest and disease management”, “resource optimization”, “agricultural supply chains”, “Himalayan agriculture”, “mountain farming systems”, “horticulture”, “sericulture”, “fisheries”, and “animal husbandry”. To address documented gaps in peer-reviewed coverage for Himalayan regions, selected governmental reports, institutional publications, and validated pilot-project documents were also consulted to capture region-specific evidence.
The analytical process was conducted in three stages. First, critical problem areas were identified for each sector based on recurrent constraints reported across multiple independent sources. Second, AI- and ML-based interventions—such as computer vision, predictive modeling, IoT-based monitoring, robotics, and blockchain-enabled traceability—were reviewed with respect to their technological approach, reported outcomes at pilot or applied scales, and relevance under temperate Himalayan agro-ecological conditions. Third, sector-specific gaps, adoption barriers, and future research directions were synthesized to inform feasible technological and policy-oriented recommendations aligned with national and state-level agricultural development initiatives.

2.1. Literature Search and Selection Strategy

A structured literature search was conducted to identify studies examining AI and ML applications across agriculture and allied sectors relevant to the temperate Himalayan region. Studies were included if they reported applied AI/ML methods, pilot-scale implementations, or outcomes demonstrably relevant to agro-ecological and socio-economic conditions comparable to those of the temperate Himalayas.
Studies focusing exclusively on unrelated geographic contexts, purely theoretical or algorithmic models without applied relevance, or non-agricultural domains were excluded. This selection strategy ensured balanced coverage of empirical research, applied case studies, and authoritative secondary sources pertinent to Himalayan agricultural systems. The identified problem areas reflect recurrent, cross-validated challenges reported across multiple independent sources rather than isolated or case-specific observations.
Where peer-reviewed Himalayan-specific studies were unavailable, credible institutional reports and validated policy documents were included to reflect applied regional realities and implementation contexts.

2.2. Problem Area Identification and Scope Definition

The twenty-one critical problem areas examined in this review were identified through iterative screening and synthesis of sector-specific literature and institutional reports. For each allied sector, challenges consistently reported across multiple sources were grouped into three broad categories: pest and disease management, resource-use inefficiencies, and market or supply chain constraints. These categories were selected because they represent dominant drivers of productivity loss across Himalayan agricultural systems and are repeatedly highlighted in national and regional assessments.
This structured classification was adopted to ensure consistency, comparability, and cross-sectoral synthesis, rather than exhaustive enumeration of all possible challenges. The focus on recurrent constraints allows prioritization of intervention areas where AI and ML applications are most likely to deliver measurable and scalable benefits under mountainous agro-ecological conditions.
Given the data scarcity and infrastructural constraints characteristic of the temperate Himalayan region, the analysis adopts a feasibility-oriented lens. Rather than assuming the availability of large labeled datasets or advanced computational infrastructure, the assessment considers interim strategies reported in the literature, including transfer learning, data augmentation, and low-cost edge-computing deployments. Economic feasibility is evaluated qualitatively based on reported hardware classes (e.g., mobile devices and single-board computers) and cooperative or community-level deployment models, rather than detailed cost modeling. This approach ensures that the assessed AI/ML pathways remain grounded in the practical realities of smallholder-dominated Himalayan systems.

2.3. Economic Estimation Methods and Assumptions

Sector-wise revenue loss estimates presented in this review are derived from secondary data sources, including peer-reviewed journal articles, governmental statistics, institutional reports, and sectoral assessments cited in the manuscript. These estimates were not generated through original economic modeling or primary field surveys, but were compiled to contextualize the relative economic impacts associated with key problem areas across agriculture and allied sectors in the temperate Himalayan region.
Where Himalayan-specific economic loss data were unavailable, values reported at state or national levels were conservatively extrapolated based on sector relevance, agro-ecological similarity, and production context. Reported ranges were retained rather than single-point values to reflect uncertainty and variability inherent in secondary data sources.
The reported revenue losses primarily capture direct impacts such as yield reduction, crop spoilage, livestock mortality, and quality degradation. In selected cases, indirect losses related to supply chain inefficiencies, delayed market access, and post-harvest handling constraints are also reflected where explicitly documented in the source literature. These estimates are intended to support comparative prioritization of AI- and ML-based interventions rather than precise economic valuation, and their interpretive limitations are acknowledged accordingly.

3. Results

The results from this review are derived from a systematic synthesis of AI/ML applications across seven allied sectors in the temperate Himalayan region. Key findings include quantified revenue losses, pilot outcomes, and applicability assessments. Tables and figures present sector-specific economic impacts, with total estimated annual losses exceeding Indian Rupee (INR) 50,000 crore across all sectors.

3.1. Agriculture

3.1.1. Pest and Disease Management

AI-Based Solutions: Computer vision techniques utilizing Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have been effectively applied to analyze leaf and fruit images obtained via smartphones and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), achieving detection accuracies of 85–95% in identifying pests and diseases relevant to temperate Himalayan crops [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Predictive modeling approaches that integrate weather parameters, soil characteristics, and historical outbreak data are increasingly used to forecast pest emergence events, thereby facilitating timely and proactive management strategies adapted for the diverse microclimates of the Himalayan region.
Work Already Done and Its Limitations: Pilot applications in Himachal Pradesh have reported up to 90% detection accuracy for apple scab and codling moth identification [17]. However, these systems often depend heavily on cloud-based servers, resulting in latency issues in the low-connectivity, mountainous contexts of the temperate Himalayas. Similarly, weather-based orchard forecasting models deployed in Jammu provide useful predictions for pest outbreaks, aiding timely interventions [18]. Yet, their broader effectiveness is constrained by the lack of region-specific labeled datasets essential for generalization across Himalayan microclimates.

3.1.2. Precision Nutrient Management

AI-Based Solutions: ML models processing soil sensor data have been developed to generate site-specific fertilizer recommendations, resulting in 15–20% improvements in nutrient use efficiency [29,30]. Furthermore, satellite-based multispectral mapping techniques help estimate spatial nutrient distribution patterns over complex mountainous terrain, supporting precision agriculture tailored to temperate Himalayan agro-ecosystems.
Work Already Done and Its Limitations: Optimization of fertilizer placement and soil management in maize cultivation in Uttarakhand demonstrates how stable yields can be maintained with reduced fertilizer use [31]. Nonetheless, high costs associated with sensor deployment remain a significant barrier for smallholder farmers in the Himalayan region. Advisory systems from other parts of India report yield improvements of about 10%, but they require substantial adaptation to the Himalayan region’s steep terrains and unique microclimates.

3.1.3. Market and Supply Chain Integration

AI-Based Solutions: ML algorithms leveraging historical crop data forecast mandi prices with high accuracy, facilitating better marketing decisions for farmers in temperate Himalayan zones [32]. Route optimization models minimize post-harvest losses by designing efficient delivery schedules across challenging mountainous road networks. Blockchain-based platforms offer traceability for high-value Himalayan crops such as saffron and walnuts, enhancing supply chain transparency and trust.
Work Already Done and Its Limitations: Market integration platforms in regions outside the Himalayas, such as Telangana, have connected thousands of farmers with buyers; however, these models lack compatibility with the transport networks and seasonal accessibility challenges unique to Himalayan agriculture. Blockchain-based pilot projects for Kashmiri saffron authentication show promise but face limitations in wider adoption due to high implementation costs and limited digital literacy among traditional farmers in the Himalayas.
Sector-wise estimates of annual revenue losses associated with key agricultural problem areas are summarized in Table 2. Figure 1 highlights that pest and disease management constitute the dominant share of total agricultural revenue loss, followed by supply chain inefficiencies.

3.2. Agricultural Engineering

3.2.1. Precision Agriculture Adoption

AI-Based Solutions: Drone-based computer vision systems have been effectively used to detect nutrient stress patterns with accuracies of around 88% across various crop types relevant to temperate Himalayan agro-ecosystems [36,37,38,39]. Additionally, automated irrigation controllers, which integrate soil moisture sensor readings with weather forecasts, have demonstrated water savings between 30–50% in pilot projects tailored for mountainous terrain [39].
Work Already Done and Its Limitations: Trials in crops like sugarcane outside the Himalayan region indicate that AI-driven irrigation scheduling can save up to 40% water [38]. However, the high initial costs of equipment and the need for specific adaptations to steep and terraced Himalayan landscapes remain significant barriers to broader adoption by smallholder farmers in these regions.

3.2.2. Inefficient Farm Mechanization

AI-Based Solutions: Autonomous compact tractors designed for terraced and sloped farming systems have demonstrated the potential to reduce labor requirements by 50% [40]. Moreover, robotic harvesting systems achieve approximately 80% accuracy on sloped terrain, addressing labor shortages during peak harvest periods in mountainous terrains.
Work Already Done and Its Limitations: Orchard trials in Punjab have reported up to 80% picking accuracy across several fruit crops [40]. While these results demonstrate the feasibility of robotic harvesting in controlled conditions, their direct application to the temperate Himalayan region remains constrained. The steep terrain, fragmented orchards, and diverse crop varieties of the Himalayas necessitate further refinement of gripping mechanisms and adaptive navigation algorithms to achieve comparable effectiveness.

3.2.3. Data Integration and Decision Support

AI-Based Solutions: Integrated dashboard platforms that consolidate weather forecasts, soil sensor data, and market information facilitate optimized decision-making for sowing and harvesting activities [41]. In parallel, blockchain-based systems provide comprehensive maintenance records for machinery and ensure crop traceability throughout the temperate Himalayan supply chains.
Work Already Done and Its Limitations: Decision-support system pilots have assisted over 10,000 farmers in making informed choices [42]. However, many such systems lack offline functionality, which is essential in remote Himalayan regions where internet connectivity is limited or intermittent [43].
Sector-wise estimates of annual revenue losses associated with key agricultural engineering challenges are summarized in Table 3. Figure 2 highlights that barriers to precision agriculture adoption contribute the largest share of losses, followed by mechanization inefficiencies and decision-support gaps.

3.3. Fisheries

3.3.1. Aquatic Disease Management

AI-Based Solutions: Random Forest and gradient boosting algorithms have been effectively utilized to forecast aquatic disease outbreaks, achieving 85–90% accuracy based on water quality parameters collected via IoT sensors suited for cold-water environments [46,47,48]. Additionally, CNNs analyze gill tissue images to identify specific pathogen markers in fish populations relevant to Himalayan aquaculture systems [49].
Work Already Done and Its Limitations: Pilots in shrimp farming in Eastern India have reported 88% disease prediction accuracy, significantly reducing mortality rates [50]. However, data on cold-water species specific to the temperate Himalayan aquaculture remains sparse, limiting the direct applicability and transferability of these predictive models to the Himalayan context.

3.3.2. Ecosystem Health Monitoring

AI-Based Solutions: Time-series ML models forecast fluctuations in dissolved oxygen and nutrient concentrations within aquatic ecosystems [51]. Furthermore, satellite multispectral imagery is used to detect algal blooms across entire watershed systems, which is critical to sustaining freshwater fisheries in mountainous regions [52,53].
Work Already Done and Its Limitations: Coastal chlorophyll monitoring systems demonstrate conceptual viability for large-scale ecosystem health assessment [54]. However, riverine and lacustrine systems in mountain regions like the Himalayas require extensive calibration and validation to ensure accurate and reliable implementation tailored to local conditions.

3.3.3. Traceability and Supply Chain Management

AI-Based Solutions: Deep learning models have been applied to authenticate fish species from photographic images with high accuracy, supporting market integrity [55]. Concurrently, blockchain platforms offer comprehensive records of handling, processing, and distribution activities, enhancing transparency along the fisheries supply chain.
Work Already Done and Its Limitations: Fish grading systems piloted in Kerala have lowered classification errors by 30%, improving market value [56]. However, cold-chain logistics in the temperate Himalayan region remain largely manual and lack integration with digital traceability technologies, restricting efficiency and quality assurance.
Sector-wise estimates of annual revenue losses associated with key fisheries-related challenges are summarized in Table 4. Figure 3 highlights that aquatic disease outbreaks account for the largest share of losses, followed by ecosystem health degradation and supply chain inefficiencies.

3.4. Forestry

3.4.1. Forest Degradation and Deforestation

AI-Based Solutions: CNN-based satellite monitoring systems facilitate near real-time detection of canopy changes with high spatial resolution, specifically tailored to temperate Himalayan forests [58,59,60,61]. Predictive hotspot modeling integrates land-use patterns and socio-economic factors to identify regions at elevated risk of deforestation within the Himalayan landscape [62].
Work Already Done and Its Limitations: Monitoring pilots in the eastern Himalayan foothills have reported detection accuracies of approximately 90% for forest cover change [63]. However, persistent cloud cover and the technical limits of satellite sensors restrict consistent monitoring in high-altitude Himalayan areas. Comparative studies in northeastern Indian states such as Assam, Nagaland, and Mizoram, though outside the temperate Himalayas, have employed Multicriteria Decision-Making (MCDM) models to assess forest cover changes and documented substantial forest loss [64]. While these results demonstrate the utility of remote sensing and Geographic Information System (GIS)-based approaches, their direct applicability to the temperate Himalayas requires calibration for unique ecological conditions, terrain complexity, and socio-economic drivers specific to the region.

3.4.2. Wildfire Management

AI-Based Solutions: Thermal-band satellite analytics combined with edge-deployed camera systems provide early wildfire detection capabilities relevant to Himalayan forest ecosystems [65]. ML risk assessment models integrate vegetation dryness indices and historical ignition data to predict wildfire probabilities in the temperate Himalayan context [66].
Work Already Done and Its Limitations: Early warning systems in Uttarakhand have reduced fire detection times by about 30%, improving response effectiveness [67]. Nevertheless, high false positive rates from agricultural burning activities pose challenges to system precision and reliability.

3.4.3. Biodiversity Loss and Wildlife Monitoring

AI-Based Solutions: Deep learning algorithms applied to camera trap images identify wildlife species with approximately 90% accuracy in temperate Himalayan forests [68,69]. ML models forecasting human–wildlife conflict hotspots utilize data on animal movement and resource availability to inform mitigation efforts.
Work Already Done and Its Limitations: Wildlife monitoring studies in Uttarakhand confirm the feasibility of automated species identification [70]. However, current systems lack comprehensive reference libraries for endemic Himalayan species and are not fully integrated into real-time forest management operations.
Sector-wise estimates of annual revenue losses associated with key forestry-related challenges are summarized in Table 5. Figure 4 indicates that forest degradation and deforestation contribute the dominant share of losses, with wildfire impacts and biodiversity loss, including human–wildlife conflicts, also imposing substantial economic burdens.

3.5. Horticulture

3.5.1. Pest and Disease Management

AI-Based Solutions: CNN models have been effectively applied to detect apple scab, codling moth, and other major pests using smartphone-captured images, achieving accuracies of 85–95% [74,75,76,77,78,79]. These models leverage deep learning to analyze visual data, enabling early and accurate pest detection critical for temperate Himalayan horticulture. Additionally, drone-based mapping systems integrated with IoT-enabled smart traps support precise infestation detection and targeted treatment applications tailored to the region’s terrain.
Work Already Done and Its Limitations: Apple orchard pilots in Himachal Pradesh have reported 85% pest detection accuracy, contributing to reduced pesticide usage [17]. However, comprehensive modeling of pesticide residues and the development of integrated pest management strategies specific to temperate Himalayan conditions remain limited.

3.5.2. Post-Harvest Losses

AI-Based Solutions: Computer vision-based fruit grading systems achieve sorting accuracies of 90% or higher for quality and ripeness assessment [80]. ML algorithms optimize shelf-life by regulating storage temperature and humidity, potentially extending storage duration by up to 15 days, a capability valuable for remote Himalayan supply chains [81].
Work Already Done and Its Limitations: Automated grading systems applied to mango processing in Punjab have demonstrated effectiveness. However, their direct applicability to the temperate Himalayan context remains limited, as comprehensive testing under cold-chain storage conditions for region-specific fruit varieties such as apples, walnuts, and cherries is still insufficient.

3.5.3. Resource Management

AI-Based Solutions: Precision irrigation scheduling systems optimize water delivery based on crop needs, soil moisture, and weather data, resulting in 30–40% water savings while maintaining or improving crop quality [37,82]. Simultaneously, drone-based multispectral surveys identify nutrient deficiencies and moisture stress patterns across orchard landscapes, supporting targeted interventions in complex Himalayan terrains.
Work Already Done and Its Limitations: Vineyard pilots in Maharashtra have demonstrated promising results for water and nutrient management optimization. However, their direct transferability to the temperate Himalayan region is constrained, as the unique microclimatic variability, steep terrains, and fruit crop diversity in the Himalayas require region-specific calibration and adaptation.
Sector-wise estimates of annual revenue losses associated with major horticulture-related challenges are summarized in Table 6. Figure 5 shows that pest and disease pressures constitute the primary source of losses, followed by post-harvest losses and resource inefficiencies.

3.6. Sericulture

3.6.1. Silkworm Disease Management

AI-Based Solutions: CNN models have been successfully applied to classify silkworm diseases such as pebrine and flacherie through analysis of larval and cocoon images, achieving high accuracy [86,87,88,89,90]. However, their use for outbreak prediction based on environmental monitoring data in temperate Himalayan sericulture remains underdeveloped. Automated image-based diagnostic systems significantly reduce detection times from days to hours, facilitating rapid intervention in disease management.
Work Already Done and Its Limitations: Practice trials report an 87% concordance with expert diagnoses, markedly improving disease management outcomes [14]. Nonetheless, adaptations of AI models to breed-specific characteristics and integration with traditional Himalayan sericulture practices remain incomplete.

3.6.2. Mulberry Cultivation Monitoring

AI-Based Solutions: Satellite multispectral analysis is utilized to detect defoliation patterns and stress indicators in mulberry plantations [5]. Soil moisture sensor networks combined with ML algorithms enable optimized irrigation scheduling suited to the region’s terrain and fragmented landholdings [10].
Work Already Done and Its Limitations: Similar studies conducted in temperate zones have reported yield prediction improvements of approximately 18% [15]. However, current models inadequately account for the fragmented landholding patterns common in Himalayan sericulture, limiting their practical applicability.

3.6.3. Silk Traceability and Supply Chain

AI-Based Solutions: Vision-based cocoon grading systems ensure quality consistency through automated analysis. Concurrently, blockchain technologies provide provenance records tracing the production process from silkworm rearing to final textile manufacture [81].
Work Already Done and Its Limitations: Silk grading laboratories in coastal regions have achieved a 25% reduction in classification errors [16]. However, deployment of such systems in remote Himalayan sericulture areas is constrained by limited connectivity and high costs.
Sector-wise estimates of annual revenue losses associated with key sericulture-related challenges are summarized in Table 7. Figure 6 highlights that silkworm disease outbreaks represent the most significant loss component, with mulberry yield declines and traceability-related losses also contributing substantially.

3.7. Animal Health and Husbandry

3.7.1. Livestock Disease Surveillance

AI-Based Solutions: Random Forest algorithms have been applied to forecast Foot-and-Mouth Disease hotspots with 80–90% accuracy using epidemiological datasets relevant to temperate regions [93,94,95]. Wearable sensor collars monitor behavioral and physiological indicators to detect early signs of diseases such as mastitis and theileriosis, facilitating timely interventions [96].
Work Already Done and Its Limitations: Livestock disease surveillance trials in tropical regions report up to 90% sensitivity in detection [97,98]. However, epidemiological and behavioral data specific to high-altitude-adapted breeds in the Himalayan region remain limited, restricting model accuracy and applicability.

3.7.2. Animal Welfare Monitoring

AI-Based Solutions: Computer vision systems analyzing animal gait patterns have achieved 92% accuracy in detecting lameness [99]. Infrared imaging technology is also employed to identify subclinical mastitis cases prior to visible symptom onset, enhancing welfare monitoring [100].
Work Already Done and Its Limitations: Poultry acoustic monitoring systems have demonstrated 85% accuracy in controlled experimental environments [101]. Nonetheless, validation under diverse farm conditions typical of Himalayan animal husbandry and integration with existing management practices remain areas requiring further advancement.

3.7.3. Record-Keeping and Traceability

AI-Based Solutions: Deep learning algorithms have been leveraged for individual cattle recognition via muzzle pattern analysis, achieving accuracies between 84–91% [102]. Blockchain and Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) technologies provide secure, immutable record maintenance of livestock health and ownership throughout their lifecycle [103,104,105].
Work Already Done and Its Limitations: Edge-AI cattle identification pilots validated on 89 animals show promising potential [104]. However, integration with existing veterinary portals and governmental databases remains incomplete. The National Institute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Disease Informatics (NIVEDI) National Animal Disease Referral Expert System (NADRES v2) platform offers comprehensive AI-based livestock surveillance capabilities, yet integration with local Himalayan systems requires further work [105].
Sector-wise estimates of annual revenue losses associated with major animal husbandry challenges are summarized in Table 8. Figure 7 illustrates that livestock disease burdens dominate sectoral losses, while welfare-related losses and record-keeping inefficiencies contribute comparatively smaller shares.

4. Discussion

The discussion synthesizes the unsolved problems and gaps identified across the seven sectors, highlighting common themes such as data scarcity, infrastructure limitations, connectivity issues, and policy misalignments that impede AI/ML adoption in the temperate Himalayas. These challenges underscore the need for region-specific, low-cost, and offline-capable solutions to bridge traditional practices with modern technologies, ensuring scalability and sustainability. Cross-sectoral insights reveal opportunities for integrated AI frameworks that address shared constraints like intermittent connectivity and high implementation costs, while leveraging national schemes for broader impact.

4.1. Agriculture

4.1.1. Unsolved Problems

On-device AI inference capabilities for pest detection remain underdeveloped for the Himalayan context. Challenges persist in integrating drone-captured geotagged data with existing agricultural databases tailored to temperate mountainous terrains. Real-time sensor-driven nutrient management under conditions of intermittent connectivity also demands further technological advancements.

4.1.2. Gaps and Future Directions

Developing edge-AI models trained on agricultural datasets specific to the temperate Himalayas is essential for localized accuracy. Leveraging government schemes such as Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY) and National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture (NMSA) to subsidize sensors, drones, and AI tools could significantly boost technology adoption. Establishing regional agricultural data cloud infrastructure, complemented with offline-capable mobile solutions, is a priority to enable resilient, technology-driven sustainable farming in these regions.

4.1.3. Feasible Solutions and Implementation Pathways

To address the identified challenges in temperate Himalayan agriculture, feasible solutions should prioritize lightweight edge-AI models capable of on-device inference for pest and disease detection under low-connectivity conditions. Transfer learning approaches using large pre-trained agricultural vision models, followed by fine-tuning with limited locally collected datasets, can improve robustness across diverse microclimates.
Integration of drone-based geotagged imagery with existing agricultural databases can be facilitated through standardized data formats and region-specific metadata protocols rather than centralized cloud dependence. Shared infrastructure models, such as cooperative-level sensor deployment and drone services, can significantly reduce individual capital costs for smallholder farmers. Additionally, embedding AI-based advisory tools within existing agricultural extension and mobile platforms can enhance usability, trust, and adoption without requiring major changes to current farming practices.

4.2. Agricultural Engineering

4.2.1. Unsolved Problems

There is a marked lack of low-cost sensor networks specifically tailored for terraced and mountainous agriculture in the Himalayas. Additionally, development is needed in mobile training platforms for farmers as well as in interoperable data standards to integrate diverse agricultural data streams effectively.

4.2.2. Gaps and Future Directions

Co-designing terrain-adaptive agricultural implements in partnership with local cooperatives and farmers is of high priority to ensure contextual suitability. Furthermore, developing multilingual, offline-capable advisory applications will substantially improve farmers’ access to technical support and knowledge in the temperate Himalayan region.

4.2.3. Feasible Solutions and Implementation Pathways

To address the challenges in agricultural engineering within the temperate Himalayan region, feasible solutions should focus on the development of modular, low-cost sensor systems and machinery attachments specifically designed for terraced and sloped fields. Retrofitting existing farm equipment with add-on sensing and control modules can reduce capital costs while improving adaptability to local terrain conditions. Participatory co-design approaches involving local cooperatives, engineers, and farmers can ensure that mechanization solutions are context-aware and practically usable. In parallel, multilingual, offline-capable mobile training and advisory platforms can support skill development and operational guidance without dependence on continuous internet access. Establishing interoperable data standards across machinery, sensors, and advisory systems will further enable integrated decision-making and long-term scalability.
In addition, terrain-specific algorithmic adaptations are required to ensure effective deployment in Himalayan conditions. These include slope-aware navigation and control algorithms, stability-constrained motion planning for autonomous or semi-autonomous machinery, and terrain-following UAV path planning to ensure safe and consistent coverage over terraced and uneven fields. Lightweight control architectures that incorporate elevation gradients, soil traction variability, and obstacle density can further enhance operational reliability. Such targeted algorithmic and mechanical adaptations provide concrete research directions for translating agricultural engineering solutions developed for plains into the terraced and mountainous landscapes of the temperate Himalayas.

4.3. Fisheries

4.3.1. Unsolved Problems

Adapting species-specific AI models for high-altitude, cold-water aquaculture, along with the deployment of edge sensors in remote Himalayan locations, remains a significant challenge. Furthermore, robust integration of ground-based sensor networks with satellite monitoring platforms requires additional technological advancements to ensure seamless data flow and real-time analysis.

4.3.2. Gaps and Future Directions

Establishing a Himalayan Fisheries Data Consortium is recommended to facilitate data sharing and promote collaborative development of region-specific predictive models. Additionally, government subsidies for edge-AI sensors and mobile-based traceability applications would help accelerate adoption among small-scale fish farmers in the region, thereby enhancing efficiency and sustainability.
Current systems remain largely manual and lack integration with digital traceability technologies, restricting both operational efficiency and quality assurance.

4.3.3. Feasible Solutions and Implementation Pathways

To overcome the identified challenges in temperate Himalayan fisheries, feasible solutions should emphasize the development of species-specific AI models using transfer learning, where models trained on large aquaculture datasets are fine-tuned with limited cold-water and high-altitude data. Deployment of low-power edge sensors capable of local data processing can enable continuous monitoring of water quality parameters even in remote locations with intermittent connectivity.
Integrating ground-based sensor data with satellite-derived observations through standardized data fusion frameworks can enhance ecosystem-level monitoring and early warning capabilities. Cooperative-based adoption of digital traceability platforms, supported through targeted government subsidies, can reduce individual costs while improving cold-chain transparency and quality assurance. Embedding these solutions within existing fisheries extension services will further support capacity building and long-term operational sustainability.

4.4. Forestry

4.4.1. Unsolved Problems

Integrating Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) and UAV data streams with ground-based monitoring remains technically complex within Himalayan forest landscapes. Moreover, developing offline mapping tools for forest rangers and enhancing capabilities to discriminate between natural wildfires and controlled burns need further research and development.

4.4.2. Gaps and Future Directions

Expanding UAV-LiDAR survey capabilities and establishing community-based forest reporting interfaces can significantly improve forest monitoring efficacy. Additionally, investing in the training of local communities for wildlife monitoring represents an important opportunity for capacity building and sustainable forest management in the temperate Himalayas.

4.4.3. Feasible Solutions and Implementation Pathways

To address the identified challenges in temperate Himalayan forestry, feasible solutions should focus on the integration of multi-source data through lightweight data fusion frameworks that combine UAV, LiDAR, and ground-based sensor inputs without reliance on continuous cloud connectivity. Offline-capable mobile mapping and alert systems can be developed for forest rangers, enabling field-level decision-making and reporting even in connectivity-limited regions.
ML models trained to distinguish wildfire signatures from controlled agricultural or pastoral burning can reduce false alarms when supplemented with contextual data such as seasonality, land-use patterns, and community reports. Community-based participatory monitoring platforms, supported by basic training and mobile interfaces, can further enhance early detection of forest degradation and wildlife conflicts. These approaches collectively promote scalable, cost-effective, and locally manageable forest monitoring systems suited to the Himalayan context.

4.5. Horticulture

4.5.1. Unsolved Problems

Development is needed for multi-pest classification systems and spoilage prediction models adapted to the transportation challenges posed by mountainous road networks. Additionally, integrating frost forecasting with irrigation management remains a significant technical challenge.

4.5.2. Gaps and Future Directions

Integrating frost forecasting capabilities with precision irrigation systems could mitigate crop losses due to frost. Furthermore, deploying mobile cold-storage monitoring sensors would enhance post-harvest management and reduce losses in remote Himalayan horticultural areas.

4.5.3. Feasible Solutions and Implementation Pathways

To address the identified challenges in temperate Himalayan horticulture, feasible solutions should focus on the development of multi-pest classification models using shared feature representations, enabling efficient detection of multiple pests within a single lightweight framework suitable for mobile deployment. Spoilage prediction models can be integrated with low-cost temperature and humidity sensors placed along transportation routes to account for delays and variability associated with mountainous road networks.
Coupling short-term frost forecasting models with automated or advisory-based irrigation scheduling can help mitigate frost damage through timely protective irrigation practices. Deployment of mobile, sensor-enabled cold storage monitoring units at cooperative or cluster levels can further reduce post-harvest losses while remaining economically viable for smallholder growers. These solutions emphasize adaptability, low infrastructure dependence, and incremental scalability under Himalayan conditions.

4.6. Sericulture

4.6.1. Unsolved Problems

Critical challenges remain in establishing real-time traceability across dispersed sericulture production units, alongside mechanisms to build trust and encourage participation among smallholder farmers.

4.6.2. Gaps and Future Directions

Developing offline-capable blockchain synchronization and voice-enabled grading applications could significantly improve accessibility for traditional sericulture practitioners in the temperate Himalayas.

4.6.3. Feasible Solutions and Implementation Pathways

To address traceability and trust-related challenges in temperate Himalayan sericulture, feasible solutions should emphasize the deployment of lightweight, offline-first traceability systems that synchronize blockchain records periodically when connectivity becomes available. Mobile-based cocoon grading tools incorporating voice-guided and icon-based interfaces can improve accessibility for smallholder farmers with limited digital literacy.
Cluster-level aggregation points managed by cooperatives can serve as intermediaries for data validation, grading, and synchronization, reducing the burden on individual producers. Trust-building can be further supported through transparent incentive mechanisms, such as quality-linked pricing and certification, directly visible to farmers via mobile interfaces. These approaches enable incremental digitization of sericulture supply chains while respecting traditional practices and infrastructural constraints.

4.7. Animal Health and Husbandry

4.7.1. Unsolved Problems

Challenges remain in synchronizing offline data logging with centralized databases, especially in low-connectivity Himalayan regions. User adoption barriers within traditional livestock management systems also require dedicated attention.

4.7.2. Gaps and Future Directions

Developing breed-specific datasets for Himalayan livestock is essential to improve the accuracy of AI models. Additionally, integrating offline-first management dashboards with national animal health missions could substantially advance disease surveillance and overall livestock management in these regions.
The overarching gaps such as limited Himalayan-specific datasets, high costs, and low digital literacy highlight the imperative for collaborative, policy-aligned interventions to realize AI/ML’s potential in enhancing sectoral resilience and livelihoods.

4.7.3. Feasible Solutions and Implementation Pathways

To address the identified challenges in temperate Himalayan animal health and husbandry, feasible solutions should prioritize offline-first data collection systems that allow local logging of health, movement, and treatment records with periodic synchronization to centralized databases when connectivity permits.
Development of breed-specific AI models can be accelerated through targeted data collection campaigns coordinated with veterinary institutions and livestock cooperatives. Low-power wearable and sensor-based monitoring systems, designed for rugged environments, can support early disease detection without imposing high operational costs. Integrating these tools into simplified management dashboards aligned with national animal health missions can improve usability and institutional adoption. Capacity-building initiatives delivered through veterinary extension services and local cooperatives are essential to overcome digital literacy barriers and ensure sustained use of AI-enabled livestock management solutions.

4.8. Cross-Sectoral Challenges and Integrated Technological Pathways

Across agriculture and allied sectors in the temperate Himalayan region, several overarching challenges consistently constrain the effective deployment of AI and ML solutions. These include the scarcity of Himalayan-specific datasets, limited and intermittent digital connectivity, high capital and maintenance costs, low levels of digital literacy among end users, and fragmented institutional and policy environments. While these challenges manifest differently across sectors, their underlying causes and impacts are largely shared.
Addressing these common constraints requires cross-disciplinary technological pathways rather than isolated, sector-specific interventions. Offline-first and edge-AI architectures offer a unifying deployment paradigm across domains, enabling localized inference and decision-making under connectivity limitations. Transfer learning and domain adaptation techniques allow models developed in data-rich regions to be efficiently fine-tuned using limited local datasets, reducing data collection burdens across sectors. Shared data infrastructures, such as regional data consortia and interoperable platforms, can support multi-sectoral data aggregation while avoiding duplication of effort.
In practice, this adaptation can be operationalized through pretraining AI models on large national or global datasets, followed by fine-tuning using limited Himalayan-specific samples augmented via domain adaptation techniques such as feature normalization, altitude-aware covariates, and microclimate-conditioned inputs.
For spatial and mechanized applications, terrain-aware adaptations including slope-sensitive navigation constraints, elevation-informed path planning, and stability-aware control logic are necessary to translate models and systems developed for plains into terraced and mountainous Himalayan environments.
Equally important are cross-sectoral deployment and governance strategies. Cooperative- and cluster-based implementation models can distribute costs, facilitate shared access to sensors and analytics, and enhance trust among smallholders across agriculture, fisheries, horticulture, and animal husbandry.
Integration of AI-enabled tools within existing extension services, forestry departments, veterinary networks, and national missions can further improve adoption and institutional alignment. Collectively, these integrated technological and organizational pathways provide a coherent framework for scaling AI-driven innovations across Himalayan agriculture and allied sectors in a sustainable and context-aware manner.
In addition to mobile phone access, farmer adoption of AI-enabled technologies in the temperate Himalayan region is constrained by learning barriers associated with more complex tools such as drones, sensor networks, automated machinery, and digital dashboards. Limited technical training, unfamiliarity with data interpretation, and concerns regarding operational reliability under rugged terrain conditions often discourage sustained use. These challenges highlight the need for simplified user interfaces, hands-on training programs, and extension-led demonstrations to ensure that advanced technologies are accessible, usable, and trusted by smallholder farmers.
While numerous AI and ML approaches have been proposed across agriculture and allied sectors, their levels of technological maturity, scalability, and practical feasibility vary considerably. To move beyond descriptive enumeration and enable critical synthesis, Table 9 presents a cross-sectoral comparison of representative AI/ML application areas, highlighting their current maturity, key operational limitations, and priority research gaps under temperate Himalayan conditions.
A critical short-term challenge across sectors is the data “cold-start” problem, where the absence of sufficiently large Himalayan-specific datasets limits model training. Several studies suggest that synthetic data generation and augmentation techniques, including generative adversarial networks (GANs), can partially mitigate this constraint by simulating pest, disease, or environmental scenarios representative of Himalayan conditions. While such synthetic data cannot replace field observations, it provides an interim pathway for improving model robustness until sustained data collection matures.
In parallel, the economic burden of edge-AI deployment on smallholder farmers necessitates a shift toward low-cost inference platforms, such as mobile-device-based models or single-board computers deployed at cooperative or cluster levels. These approaches reduce individual capital costs while maintaining practical functionality under low-connectivity conditions.
These approaches are intended as interim solutions and do not replace the need for sustained, long-term field data collection across Himalayan agro-ecosystems.

4.9. Alignment with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

The application of AI and ML across agriculture and allied sectors in the temperate Himalayan region aligns directly with multiple United Nations SDGs, reinforcing the broader societal relevance of this review. Contributions to SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) are evident through AI-enabled pest and disease management, precision nutrient use, and post-harvest loss reduction, which collectively support food security and sustainable agricultural productivity in vulnerable mountain systems.
Advancements discussed in this review also support SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) by promoting the adoption of context-appropriate digital technologies, including edge-AI systems, interoperable data platforms, and adaptive machinery suited to mountainous terrains. The emphasis on resource-efficient practices, traceability, and optimized supply chains contributes to SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) by reducing input waste, improving value-chain transparency, and minimizing post-harvest losses across sectors.
Climate-resilient interventions such as wildfire risk prediction, climate-informed irrigation scheduling, and ecosystem monitoring directly address SDG 13 (Climate Action) by enhancing adaptive capacity to climate variability and extreme events in the Himalayan region. Furthermore, applications in forestry, biodiversity monitoring, and sustainable livestock management align with SDG 15 (Life on Land) by supporting ecosystem conservation, reducing land degradation, and mitigating human–wildlife conflicts.
Collectively, these SDG linkages demonstrate that AI and ML, when deployed through context-aware and inclusive pathways, can play a critical role in advancing sustainable development, environmental resilience, and livelihood security in the temperate Himalayan region.

5. Conclusions

This review provides a structured synthesis for researchers and policymakers, highlighting how AI and ML can be effectively adopted across agriculture and allied sectors in the temperate Himalayan region despite persistent constraints. The analysis underscores the transformative potential of AI/ML across seven allied sectors while identifying key barriers to their widespread adoption. Findings from the reviewed literature indicate accuracies ranging from 80–95% under pilot and controlled conditions in critical applications such as pest and disease detection, yield prediction, weather forecasting, and resource optimization. However, large-scale implementation remains constrained by region-specific challenges, including data scarcity, infrastructural gaps, climatic variability, and limitations in technical expertise.

5.1. Research Gaps and Limitations

Critical gaps include the lack of Himalayan-specific datasets, which constrains model accuracy for local crops, livestock, and ecosystems. Intermittent connectivity in remote areas limits the effectiveness of cloud-dependent solutions, while the high costs of sensors, drones, and edge devices restrict access for many smallholder farmers. In addition, low digital literacy and policy misalignment continue to hinder adoption, with traditional practices often remaining disconnected from emerging digital tools.

5.2. Technology Adoption Recommendations

To address these barriers, the development of computationally efficient edge-AI models suitable for offline and low-resource environments is essential for deployment in mountainous regions. Establishing regional data consortia for agriculture, fisheries, and forestry can support collaborative data sharing and model development. Multilingual and voice-enabled interfaces can help bridge digital literacy gaps, while alignment with national policy schemes such as PMFBY and NMSA can facilitate subsidized access to AI-enabled technologies. Furthermore, blockchain-based traceability for high-value products, including saffron and organic produce, can enhance market transparency and consumer trust.

5.3. Future Directions

Future research and implementation efforts should prioritize the development of cross-sectoral data platforms that integrate agricultural, meteorological, and market information to support predictive analytics and decision-making. Community-based monitoring systems offer opportunities to strengthen forestry conservation while generating local livelihoods. Collaborative research involving academia, government agencies, and technology providers should focus on cost-effective, culturally aligned solutions that complement traditional knowledge systems. Sustained investment in capacity building for farmers, extension workers, and local technicians remains essential to ensure long-term adoption, resilience, and sustainable development across Himalayan communities.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.R.Z.; methodology, A.S. and M.F.; validation, A.S. and M.F.; investigation, A.S. and M.F.; resources, S.R.Z. and S.G.; data curation, A.S. and M.F.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S. and M.F.; writing—review and editing, A.S., M.F., S.R.Z. and S.G.; supervision, S.R.Z.; project administration, S.R.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the valuable contributions of researchers and institutions engaged in AI and ML applications within Himalayan agriculture and allied sectors. Special recognition is extended to participants of pilot projects and local farming communities, whose cooperation facilitated the practical validation of these technologies.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AIArtificial Intelligence
CNNConvolutional Neural Network
GISGeographic Information System
INRIndian Rupee
IoTInternet of Things
LiDARLight Detection and Ranging
MCDMMulticriteria Decision-Making
MLMachine Learning
NADRESNational Animal Disease Referral Expert System
NIVEDINational Institute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Disease Informatics
NMSANational Mission for Sustainable Agriculture
PMFBYPradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana
RFIDRadio-Frequency Identification
SDGSustainable Development Goal
UAVUnmanned Aerial Vehicle

References

  1. Liakos, K.G.; Busato, P.; Moshou, D.; Pearson, S.; Bochtis, D. Machine Learning in Agriculture: A Review. Sensors 2018, 18, 2674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nautiyal, M.; Joshi, S.; Hussain, I.; Rawat, H.; Joshi, A.; Saini, A.; Kapoor, R.; Verma, H.; Nautiyal, A.; Chikara, A.; et al. Revolutionizing Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Enhancing Properties of Agricultural Produce. Food Chem. X 2025, 29, 102748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sharma, R.; Singh, A.; Kumar, S. Machine Learning in Sustainable Agriculture: Systematic Review and Research Perspectives. Agriculture 2025, 15, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liakos, K.G.; Tziotziou, I.; Moshou, D. Machine Learning in Agriculture: A Comprehensive Updated Review. Sensors 2021, 21, 3758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Abu-Jabed, M.; Azmi Murad, M.A. Crop Yield Prediction in Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches, with Insights for Future Research and Sustainability. Heliyon 2024, 10, e40836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Akyol, K.; Muhammad, A.; Lee, N.; Waqar, M.; Lee, S.W. Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review of AI-Driven Technologies in Crop Production. Sustainability 2025, 17, 2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Javaid, M.; Haleem, A.; Khan, I.H.; Suman, R. Understanding the Potential Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Agricul-ture Sector. Adv. Agrochem. 2023, 2, 15–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Aijaz, N.; Lan, H.; Raza, T.; Yaqub, M.; Iqbal, R.; Pathan, M.S. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture: Advancing Crop Productivity and Sustainability. J. Agric. Food Res. 2025, 20, 101762. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389268118_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Agriculture_Advancing_Crop_Productivity_and_Sustainability (accessed on 19 October 2025). [CrossRef]
  9. Kshetri, N. Artificial Intelligence in Developing Countries. IT Prof. 2020, 22, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Saqib, S. Integrative Decision Support Model for Smart Agriculture Based on Internet of Things and Machine Learning. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 181, 105987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, H.; Pan, X.; Zhu, Y.; Li, S.; Zhu, R. Maize leaf disease recognition based on TC-MRSN model in sustainable agriculture. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2024, 221, 108915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Guo, W.; Huang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Li, Y.; Song, X.; Shen, J.; Qi, X.; Zhang, B.; Zhu, Z.; Peng, S.; et al. Develop agricultural planting structure prediction model based on machine learning: The aging of the population has prompted a shift in the planting structure toward food crops. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2024, 221, 108941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. IPCC. Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019; Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/ (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  14. Steffen, A.D. AI Doctors Are as Skilled as Human Experts in Medical Diagnoses. Intelligent Living October. 2019. Available online: https://www.intelligentliving.co/ai-doctors-skilled-as-human-experts-medical-diagnoses/ (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  15. Ashfaq, M.; Khan, I.; Afzal, R.F.; Shah, D.; Ali, S.; Tahir, M. Enhanced Wheat Yield Prediction through Integrated Climate and Satellite Data Using Advanced AI Techniques. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 18093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Agriculture Institute. How to Test and Grade Raw Silk for Quality Assurance. Introduction to Sericulture December. 2023. Available online: https://agriculture.institute/introduction-to-sericulture/test-grade-raw-silk-quality-assurance/ (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  17. Leiva, F.; Gabioud Rebeaud, S.; Christen, D. Real-Time Identification and Quantification of Apple Scab on Fruit in Preharvest and Postharvest Conditions Using YOLOv11: A Deep Learning Approach. Research Square 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yangskit, T.; Gul, S.; Sherwani, A.; Shah, I.; Chosdon, S.; Laskit, J. Impact of Seasonal Weather Patterns on the Incidence of Key Insect Pests Affecting Nectarine Orchards in Kashmir. SKUAST J. Res. 2025, 27, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kamilaris, A.; Prenafeta-Boldú, F. Deep Learning in Agriculture: A Survey. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2018, 147, 70–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Aziz, D.; Rafiq, S.; Saini, P. Remote Sensing and Artificial Intelligence: Revolutionizing Pest Management in Agriculture. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2025, 9, 1551460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vahdanjoo, M.; Gislum, R.; Sørensen, C.A.G. Three-dimensional area coverage planning model for robotic application. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2025, 219, 108789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Warrier, S.G. Farming with AI and Drones to Increase Yields, Manage Resources and Reduce Pests. Mongabay India. 2024. Available online: https://india.mongabay.com/2024/04/farming-with-ai-and-drones-to-increase-yields-manage-resources-and-reduce-pests/ (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  23. India AI. AI in Agriculture in 2025: Transforming Indian Farms for a Sustainable Future. India AI. 2025. Available online: https://indiaai.gov.in/article/ai-in-agriculture-in-2025-transforming-indian-farms-for-a-sustainable-future (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  24. KPMG India. Embedding Intelligence in Agriculture: AI’s Role in Smarter Pest Management. KPMG. 2025. Available online: https://kpmg.com/in/en/blogs/2025/07/embedding-intelligence-in-agriculture-ais-role-in-smarter-pest-management.html (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  25. India AI. How AI-Powered Drones Are Changing the Agritech Landscape in India. India AI. 2025. Available online: https://indiaai.gov.in/article/how-ai-powered-drones-are-changing-the-agritech-landscape-in-india (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  26. Ehsani, R.; Douridas, N. Drones for Spraying Pesticides—Opportunities and Challenges. Ohio Line. 2020. Available online: https://ohioline.osu.edu/factsheet/fabe-540 (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  27. IHFC. Autonomous AI Agriculture Drone. IHFC 2025. Available online: https://www.ihfc.co.in/research-development/autonomous-ai-agriculture-drone/ (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  28. Agribusiness Global. AI and Pest Management: Protecting Yields with Smart Technology. Agribusiness Global. 2024. Available online: https://www.agribusinessglobal.com/agtech/ai-and-pest-management-protecting-yields-with-smart-technology/ (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  29. Banerjee, S.; Patil, S. Optimizing Fertilizer Usage in Agriculture with AI-Driven Models. J. Agric. Technol. 2024, 21, 630–631. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sadhukhan, R.; Kumar, D.; Sepat, S.; Ghosh, A.; Banerjee, K.; Shivay, Y.S.; Gawdiya, S.; Harish, M.N.; Bhatia, A.; Kumawat, A.; et al. Precision nutrient management influences the productivity, nutrient use efficiency, N2O fluxes and soil enzymatic activity in zero-till wheat (Tritium aestivum L.). Field Crops Res. 2024, 317, 109526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Joshi, R.; Singh, V.; Ram, S.; Srivastava, A. Effect of Soil Compaction and Fertilizer Placement Depth on Growth, Yield, Nutrient Uptake of Maize (Zea mays L.) and Soil Properties in Tarai Soils of Uttarakhand. Int. J. Agric. Environ. Biotechnol. 2016, 9, 807–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hithaishi, U.; Karthik, K.; Goutham Krishna, U.; Uday, P.; Pramod, D. Crop Price Prediction Using Historical Data and ML. Int. J. Progress. Res. Eng. Manag. Sci. 2024, 4, 247–253. [Google Scholar]
  33. Farmonaut. Indian Agriculture Challenges 2025: Top Issues & Solutions. Farmonaut. 2025. Available online: https://farmonaut.com/asia/indian-agriculture-challenges-2025-top-issues-solutions (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  34. Kumar, S.; Hasanain, M.; Singh, R.K.; Rathore, S.S. Precision Nutrient Management: Innovative Technology for Enhancing Income in Farming System. Indian Farming 2025, 75, 54–58. [Google Scholar]
  35. Farmonaut. Current Scenario of Indian Agriculture 2025: Issues & Trends. Farmonaut. 2025. Available online: https://farmonaut.com/asia/current-scenario-of-indian-agriculture-2025-issues-trends (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  36. Mulla, S. Twenty Five Years of Remote Sensing in Precision Agriculture: Key Advances and Remaining Knowledge Gaps. Biosyst. Eng. 2013, 114, 358–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gupta, D.N.; Panchal, V.K.; Kumari, A.; Singh, S.; Gupta, A. IoT-Dependent Intelligent Irrigation System with ML-Dependent Soil Moisture Prediction. In 2023 3rd International Conference on Technological Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICTACS); IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Farmonaut. Revolutionizing Water Management: Smart Irrigation Systems for Sustainable Agriculture. Farmonaut Precision Farming. 2025. Available online: https://farmonaut.com/precision-farming/smart-irrigation-systems-boost-sustainable-water-management (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  39. Minhas, P.S.; Ramos, T.B.; Ben-Gal, A.; Pereira, L.S. Coping with salinity in irrigated agriculture: Crop evapotranspiration and water management issues. Agric. Water Manag. 2020, 227, 105832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Farmonaut. Revolutionizing United States Farming: How Autonomous Tractors and Smart Irrigation Systems Boost Productivity. Farmonaut USA. 2025. Available online: https://farmonaut.com/usa/revolutionizing-united-states-farming-how-autonomous-tractors-and-smart-irrigation-systems-boost-productivity (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  41. Conde, G.; Guzmán, S.M.; Athelly, A. Adaptive and predictive decision support system for irrigation scheduling: An approach integrating humans in the control loop. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2024, 217, 108640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ramya, B. Importance of Decision Support System in Agriculture. Agric. Food E-Newslett. 2025, 7, 386–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Global Himalayan Expedition. Remote Himalayan Communities Creating Smart and Sustainable Villages, Ladakh. Energy November. 2022. Available online: https://www.ghe.org/ (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  44. Singh, S. Farm Mechanisation in India: Unveiling the Drivers and Outlook. Sathguru Blog. 2024. Available online: https://blog.sathguru.com/agribusiness/farm-mechanisation-in-india-unveiling-the-drivers-and-outlook/ (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  45. Armstrong, L. (Ed.) Improving Data Management and Decision Support Systems in Agriculture; Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2020; Volume 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Aung, T.; Abdul Razak, R.; Rahiman Bin Md Nor, A. Artificial Intelligence Methods Used in Various Aquaculture Applications: A Systematic Literature Review. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2025, 56, e13107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Patil, P.K.; Geetha, R.; Mishra, S.S. Unveiling the Economic Burden of Diseases in Aquatic Animal Food Production in India. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2025, 9, 1480094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bolser, D.G.; Berger, A.M.; Chu, D.; de Blois, S.; Pohl, J.; Thomas, R.E.; Wallace, J.; Hastie, J.; Clemons, J.; Ciannelli, L.; et al. Using Age Compositions Derived from Spatio-Temporal Models and Acoustic Data Collected by Uncrewed Surface Vessels to Estimate Pacific Hake (Merluccius productus) Biomass-at-Age. Front. Mar. Sci. 2023, 10, 1214798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Roy, S.M.; Beg, M.M.; Bhagat, S.K.; Charan, D.; Pareek, C.M.; Moulick, S.; Kim, T. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Aquaculture—Recent Developments and Prospects. Aquac. Eng. 2025, 111, 102570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kumar, S.; Saxena, V.; Wattal, S. The Role of IoT in Transforming the Shrimp Industry in Andhra Pradesh. Educ. Adm. Theory Pract. 2024, 30, 13764–13767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ubina, N.A.; Cheng, S.-C.; Chen, H.-Y.; Chang, C.-C.; Lan, H.-Y. A Visual Aquaculture System Using a Cloud-Based Autonomous Drones. Drones 2021, 5, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Deng, J.; Bai, Y.; Chen, Z.; Shen, T.; Li, C.; Yang, X. A Convolutional Neural Network for Coastal Aquaculture Extraction from High-Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Soltanzadeh, R.; Hardy, B.; McLeod, R.D.; Friesen, M.R. A Prototype System for Real-Time Monitoring of Arctic Char in Indoor Aquaculture Operations: Possibilities & Challenges. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 180815–180824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ouyang, H.; Deng, N.; Xu, J.; Huang, J.; Han, C.; Liu, D.; Liu, S.; Yan, B.; Han, L.; Li, S.; et al. Effects of hyperosmotic stress on the intestinal microbiota, transcriptome, and immune function of mandarin fish (Siniperca chuatsi). Aquaculture 2023, 563, 738901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ou, L.; Wang, Y. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Fish Information Identification: A Scientometric Perspective. Front. Mar. Sci. 2025, 12, 1575523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nair, R.K.; Shibu, A.V. Assessment of Fish Loss in Domestic Fish Markets in Central Kerala. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. India 2023, 65, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. PRS Legislative Research. Employment Generation and Revenue Earning Potential of Fisheries Sector—Standing Committee Report Summary. PRS India. 2025. Available online: https://prsindia.org/policy/report-summaries/employment-generation-and-revenue-earning-potential-of-fisheries-sector (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  58. Bhuyan, J.M.; Das, P. Harnessing Time-Series Satellite Data and Deep Learning to Monitor Historical Patterns of Deforestation in Eastern Himalayan Foothills of India. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 2025, 53, 993–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gupta, L.; Dixit, J.; Pandey, P.C. Assessment of Forest Cover Dynamics for the Detection of Deforestation in the Hindu Kush Himalayan Region Using Geospatial and Machine Learning Approaches. Earth Sci. Inform. 2025, 18, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Khan, R.W.A.; Shaheen, H.; Dar, M.E.U.I.; Habib, T.; Manzoor, M.; Gillani, S.W.; Al-Andal, A.; Ayoola, J.O.; Waheed, M. A data-driven approach to forest health assessment through multivariate analysis and machine learning techniques. BMC Plant Biol. 2025, 25, 915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. OpenForest Team. OpenForest: A Data Catalog for Machine Learning in Forest Monitoring. Environ. Data Sci. 2025, 4, e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, T.; Li, X. Harnessing Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Sustainable Forestry Management and Conservation: Transformative Potential and Future Perspectives. Plants 2025, 14, 998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Jain, R.; Shukla, A. Monitoring of Forest Cover Change in India. Int. J. Res. Publ. Rev. 2025, 6, 15882–15888. [Google Scholar]
  64. Guria, R.; Santos, C.; Mishra, M.; Baraj, B.; Silva, R.; Goswami, S.; Bhutia, K. Examining the Drivers of Forest Cover Change and Deforestation Susceptibility in Northeast India Using Multicriteria Decision-Making Models. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2024, 196, 1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mehmood, K.; Anees, S.A.; Muhammad, S.; Shahzad, F.; Liu, Q.; Khan, W.R.; Shrahili, M.; Ansari, M.J.; Dube, T. Machine Learning and Spatio Temporal Analysis for Assessing Ecological Impacts of the Billion Tree Afforestation Project. Ecol. Evol. 2025, 15, e70736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Thapa, S.; Maraseni, T.; Dhonju, H.K.; Shakya, K.; Shakya, B.; Apan, A.; Banerjee, B. Predictive assessment of forest fire risk in the Hindu Kush Himalaya (HKH) region using HIWAT data integration. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 2255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Azad, S. App Developed by Uttarakhand Forest Department & IIRS for Early Detection, Swift Dousing of Wildfires. Times of India March. 2022. Available online: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/dehradun/app-developed-by-uttarakhand-forest-department-iirs-for-early-detection-swift-dousing-of-wildfires/articleshow/90483866.cms (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  68. Sharma, A.; Gupta, V. Potential for Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) Applications in Biodiversity Conservation, Managing Forests, and Related Services in India. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ali, J.; Khan, M. Remote Sensing and Integration of Machine Learning Algorithms for Above-Ground Biomass Estimation in Larix Principis-Rupprechtii Mayr Plantations: A Case Study Using Sentinel-2 and Landsat-9 Data in Northern China. Front. Environ. Sci. 2025, 13, 1577298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Azad, S. AI to Help Mitigate Human–Wildlife Conflict in Uttarakhand; Pilot Project Starts at Corbett. Times of India August. 2024. Available online: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/dehradun/ai-pilot-project-to-mitigate-human-wildlife-conflict-in-uttarakhand/articleshow/112695257.cms (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  71. Vaidyanathan, S. Satellite Data and AI Identify Deforestation Drivers: Beyond Protected Areas. Mongabay India 7 August 2025. Available online: https://india.mongabay.com/2025/08/satellite-data-and-ai-identify-deforestation-drivers/ (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  72. Goldman, E.; Carter, S.; Sims, M. Fires Drove Record-Breaking Tropical Forest Loss in 2024. Global Forest Review. 2025. Available online: https://gfr.wri.org/latest-analysis-deforestation-trends (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  73. Madhok, R. Can Inclusive Institutions Balance the Development-Biodiversity Trade-Off? VoxDev March. 2025. Available online: https://voxdev.org/topic/energy-environment/can-inclusive-institutions-balance-development-biodiversity-trade (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  74. Kodors, S.; Lacis, G.; Sokolova, O.; Zhukovs, V.; Bartulsons, T. Apple Scab Detection Using CNN and Transfer Learning. Agron. Res. 2021, 19, 507–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Čirjak, D.; Aleksi, I.; Lemic, D.; Pajač Živković, I. EfficientDet-4 Deep Neural Network-Based Remote Monitoring of Codling Moth Population for Early Damage Detection in Apple Orchard. Agriculture 2023, 13, 961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Lima, M.; Leandro, M.; Valero, C.; Coronel, L.; Bazzo, C. Automatic Detection and Monitoring of Insect Pests—A Review. Agriculture 2020, 10, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wimmer, G.; Schraml, R.; Petutschnigg, A.; Uhl, A. Log cross section quality metrics: Assessing the usability of roundwood image data for roundwood tracking. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2024, 221, 108945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Venkateswara, S.; Padmanabhan, J. Deep Learning Based Agricultural Pest Monitoring and Classification. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 8684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wen, C.; Wen, J.; Li, J.; Luo, Y.; Chen, M.; Xiao, Z.; Xu, Q.; Liang, X.; An, H. Lightweight silkworm recognition based on Multi-scale feature fusion. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2022, 200, 107234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tang, L.; Shao, J.; Miller Naranjo, B.; Zhu, Y.; Lieleg, O.; Song, J. Sugar or milk: Tribological study on the sensation of coffee beverages. J. Food Eng. 2024, 367, 111876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Pathmanaban, P.; Gnanavel, B.; Anandan, S.; Sathiyamurthy, S. Advancing Post-Harvest Fruit Handling through AI-Based Thermal Imaging: Applications, Challenges, and Future Trends. Discov. Food 2023, 3, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Heinzle, J.; Kitzler, B.; Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S.; Tian, Y.; Kengdo, S.K.; Wanek, W.; Borken, W.; Schindlbacher, A. Soil CH4 and N2O response diminishes during decadal soil warming in a temperate mountain forest. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2023, 329, 109287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Gupta, N.; Pradhan, S.; Jain, A.; Patel, N. Sustainable Agriculture in India 2021: What We Know and How to Scale Up; Council on Energy, Environment and Water: New Delhi, India, 2021. Available online: https://www.ceew.in/publications/sustainable-agriculture-india (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  84. Press Information Bureau. NABCONS Study Assesses Post-Harvest Losses Across 54 Crops During 2020–22. PIB. 2025. Available online: https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2151371 (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  85. Thakur, A.; Bodh, S.; Verma, P.; Verma, P. Sustainable Strategies for Post-Harvest Management and Utilization of Horticultural Surplus in India. Agric. Assoc. Text. Chem. Crit. Rev. J. 2025, 13, 327–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Binson, V.A.; Manju, G. Automated Disease Detection in Silkworms Using Machine Learning Techniques. Adv. Sustainable Sci., Eng. Technol. 2024, 6, 965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhen, Y.; Wang, L. Attention-Concatenation Dense Convolutional Neural Network for Silkworm Disease Recognition. In Proceedings of the 2020 5th International Conference on Smart Grid and Electrical Automation (ICSGEA), Zhangjiajie, China, 13–14 June 2020; pp. 254–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Deepika, S.; Kumar, V. Molecular Diagnostics in Sericulture: A Paradigm Shift Towards Disease Diagnosis in Silkworms. Entomol. Exp. Et Appl. 2024, 172, 289–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Xu, Y.; Zhang, Q. Intelligent Detection Method of Microparticle Virus in Silkworm Based on YOLOv8 Improved Algorithm. J. Supercomput. 2024, 80, 23145–23167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kiruthika, C.; Susikaran, S.; Karthick Mani Bharathi, B. Common Diseases of Silkworm and Their Management—A Comprehensive Overview. Int. J. Insects 2025, 2, 22–28. [Google Scholar]
  91. C, H.R.; Bhat, M.Y.; N, S.; Naik, B.R.; Gowda, N.M.P.K. A Review on Blockchain for Traceability and Transparency in Sericulture Supply Chains. Arch. Curr. Res. Int. 2025, 25, 452–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. MarketDataForecast. Silk Market Size, Share, Trends, & Growth Forecast Report Segmented by Type (Mulberry Silk, Tussar Silk, Eri Silk, Muga Silk, and Others), Application, Region, and Industry Analysis (2025 to 2033). MarketDataForecast. 2025. Available online: https://www.marketdataforecast.com/market-reports/silk-market (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  93. De Oliveira, G.M.; Silva, J. Guiding Principles of AI: Application in Animal Husbandry and Other Considerations. Anim. Front. 2023, 13, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kumari, M.; Dhawal, K. Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Animal Husbandry. Vigyan Varta 2021, 2, 27–29. [Google Scholar]
  95. Baldin, M.; Dresch, A. Integrated Decision Support Systems for Dairy Farming. Animals 2021, 11, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Neethirajan, S. The Role of Sensors, Big Data and Machine Learning in Modern Animal Farming. Sens. Bio-Sens. Res. 2025, 29, 100367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Beckley, C.; Shaban, S.; Palmer, G.; Hudak, A.; Noh, S.; Futse, J. Disaggregating Tropical Disease Prevalence by Climatic and Vegetative Zones within Tropical West Africa. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Claassen, D.; Odendaal, L.; Sabeta, C.; Fosgate, G.; Mohale, D.; Williams, J.; Clift, S. Diagnostic Sensitivity and Specificity of Immunohistochemistry for the Detection of Rabies Virus in Domestic and Wild Animals in South Africa. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2023, 35, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kang, X.; Zhang, X.; Liu, G. A Review: Development of Computer Vision-Based Lameness Detection for Dairy Cows and Discussion of the Practical Applications. Sensors 2021, 21, 753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Viejo, C.G.; Fuentes, S. The Livestock Farming Digital Transformation: Implementation of New and Emerging Technologies Using Artificial Intelligence. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2023, 23, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Rohini, H.; Prabhavathi, S. Automated Poultry Health Monitoring Through Acoustic Analysis Using Convolutional Neural Networks. Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res. 2025, 15, 26339–26343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Qiao, Y.; Su, D.; Kong, H.; Sukkarieh, S.; Lomax, S.; Clark, C. Individual Cattle Identification Using a Deep Learning Based Framework. IFAC Pap. 2019, 52, 318–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. AgriNext Conference. RFID Tags on Livestock Management: Improving Efficiency and Traceability. AgriNext Conference August. 2024. Available online: https://agrinextcon.com/rfid-tags-on-livestock-management/ (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  104. Dac, H.; Gonzalez Viejo, C.; Lipovetzky, N.; Tongson, E.; Dunshea, F.; Fuentes, S. Livestock Identification Using Deep Learning for Traceability. Sensors 2022, 22, 8256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. ICAR-NIVEDI. NADRES v2: National Animal Disease Referral Expert System. ICAR-NIVEDI. 2025. Available online: https://www.nivedi.res.in/Nadres_v2/ (accessed on 19 October 2025).
  106. Govindaraj, G.; Ganesh Kumar, B.; Krishnamohan, A.; Raveendra Hegde, D.; Nanda Kumar, E.; Kokila Prabhakaran, F.; Vinay Mohan Wadhwan, G.; Naresh Kakker, H.; Lokhande, T.; Krishna Sharma, J.; et al. Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) Incidence in Cattle and Buffaloes and Its Associated Farm-Level Economic Costs in Endemic India. Prev. Vet. Med. 2021, 190, 105318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Bhogal, S. Livestock and Products Annual; USDA Foreign Agricultural Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  108. Escobar-Tello, M. Perceptions and Practices of Farm Record Keeping and Their Implications for Animal Welfare and Regulation; Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: London, UK, 2015. Available online: http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx?Menu=Menu&Module=More&Location=None&Completed=0&ProjectID=18442 (accessed on 19 October 2025).
Figure 1. Annual Revenue Loss in Agriculture by Key Problem Areas (INR Crore).
Figure 1. Annual Revenue Loss in Agriculture by Key Problem Areas (INR Crore).
Agriengineering 08 00035 g001
Figure 2. Revenue Losses in the Agricultural Engineering Sector by Problem Area (INR crore annually).
Figure 2. Revenue Losses in the Agricultural Engineering Sector by Problem Area (INR crore annually).
Agriengineering 08 00035 g002
Figure 3. Revenue Losses in the Fisheries Sector by Problem Area (INR crore annually).
Figure 3. Revenue Losses in the Fisheries Sector by Problem Area (INR crore annually).
Agriengineering 08 00035 g003
Figure 4. Revenue Losses in the Forestry Sector by Problem Area (INR crore annually).
Figure 4. Revenue Losses in the Forestry Sector by Problem Area (INR crore annually).
Agriengineering 08 00035 g004
Figure 5. Revenue Losses in the Horticulture Sector by Problem Area (INR crore annually).
Figure 5. Revenue Losses in the Horticulture Sector by Problem Area (INR crore annually).
Agriengineering 08 00035 g005
Figure 6. Revenue Losses in the Sericulture Sector by Problem Area (INR crore annually).
Figure 6. Revenue Losses in the Sericulture Sector by Problem Area (INR crore annually).
Agriengineering 08 00035 g006
Figure 7. Revenue Losses in the Animal Husbandry Sector by Problem Area (INR crore annually).
Figure 7. Revenue Losses in the Animal Husbandry Sector by Problem Area (INR crore annually).
Agriengineering 08 00035 g007
Table 1. Study Contributions and Key Challenges Addressed.
Table 1. Study Contributions and Key Challenges Addressed.
Major ContributionsCore ObjectivesUniquenessKey Challenges
Addressed
Cross sector synthesis of AI and ML useSummarize
methods across
domains
First review for temperate HimalayasConnectivity gaps, fragmented policies
Framework for revenue assessmentEstimate economic losses across sectorsRegion focused
compilation
Data scarcity, high costs
Domain specific gap analysis and future directionsHighlight limitations and propose solutionsActionable with national and state schemesLow digital literacy, policy misalignment
Focus on scalability and sustainabilitySuggest lightweight
AI and capacity
building
Multisectoral recommendationsInfrastructure gaps,
affordability issues
Table 2. Agriculture Sector Revenue Losses (INR crore annually).
Table 2. Agriculture Sector Revenue Losses (INR crore annually).
Problem AreaAnnual Revenue Loss (INR Crore)
Pest and Disease Management800–1000 [33]
Nutrient Management250–400 [34]
Supply-Chain Integration18,000–21,000 [35]
Total19,050–22,400 [33,34,35]
Table 3. Agricultural Engineering Sector Revenue Losses (INR crore annually).
Table 3. Agricultural Engineering Sector Revenue Losses (INR crore annually).
Problem AreaAnnual Revenue Loss (INR Crore)
Precision Agriculture Adoption400–600 [33]
Farm Mechanization250–350 [44]
Decision Support Gaps150–250 [45]
Total800–1200 [33,44,45]
Table 4. Fisheries Sector Revenue Losses (INR crore annually).
Table 4. Fisheries Sector Revenue Losses (INR crore annually).
Problem AreaAnnual Revenue Loss (INR Crore)
Disease Outbreaks400–600 [47]
Ecosystem Health150–200 [57]
Supply-Chain/Traceability70–120 [56]
Total620–920 [47,56,57]
Table 5. Forestry Sector Revenue Losses (INR crore annually).
Table 5. Forestry Sector Revenue Losses (INR crore annually).
Problem AreaAnnual Revenue Loss (INR Crore)
Degradation/Deforestation1000–1200 [71]
Wildfires (direct + indirect)400–500 [72]
Biodiversity Loss & Conflicts300–400 [73]
Total1700–2100 [71,72,73]
Table 6. Horticulture Sector Revenue Losses (INR crore annually).
Table 6. Horticulture Sector Revenue Losses (INR crore annually).
Problem AreaAnnual Revenue Loss (INR Crore)
Pest and Disease Management400–600 [83]
Post-Harvest Losses250–350 [84]
Resource Inefficiencies150–250 [85]
Total800–1200 [83,84,85]
Table 7. Sericulture Sector Revenue Losses (INR crore annually).
Table 7. Sericulture Sector Revenue Losses (INR crore annually).
Problem AreaAnnual Revenue Loss (INR Crore)
Silkworm Diseases2000–3000 [91]
Mulberry Yield Declines∼2000 [92]
Traceability Losses∼800 [92]
Total4800–5800 [91,92]
Table 8. Animal Husbandry Sector Revenue Losses (INR crore annually).
Table 8. Animal Husbandry Sector Revenue Losses (INR crore annually).
Problem AreaAnnual Revenue Loss (INR Crore)
Livestock Diseases20,000–25,000 [106]
Welfare-Related Losses2000–3000 [107]
Record-Keeping Penalties<10 [108]
Total22,010–28,010 [106,107,108]
Table 9. Cross-sectoral synthesis of AI/ML applications, maturity, limitations, and research gaps in the temperate Himalayan region.
Table 9. Cross-sectoral synthesis of AI/ML applications, maturity, limitations, and research gaps in the temperate Himalayan region.
Application AreaRepresentative AI/ML TechniquesDeployment MaturityKey LimitationsPriority Research Gaps
Pest and disease detection (agriculture & horticulture)CNN-based image classification, smartphone and UAV imageryPilot to early deploymentLimited Himalayan-specific datasets; reliance on cloud inference; variable field conditionsLightweight edge-AI models; region-specific labeled datasets; robustness under low-light and occlusion
Precision nutrient and irrigation managementSensor-driven ML models, weather-integrated decision systemsPilot stageHigh sensor costs; terrain-related deployment challenges; intermittent connectivityLow-cost sensor networks; terrain-adaptive algorithms; offline-capable advisory systems
Farm mechanization and roboticsAutonomous compact tractors, robotic harvesting systemsExperimental to pilotLimited adaptability to terraced fields; high capital costs; navigation complexityTerrain-aware navigation; modular retrofitting of existing machinery; cost reduction strategies
Fisheries disease and ecosystem monitoringML-based water quality prediction; satellite–sensor data fusionPilot stageSparse cold-water datasets; limited sensor coverage in remote areasSpecies-specific models; integrated ground–satellite fusion frameworks; low-power edge sensors
Forestry monitoring and wildfire detectionSatellite analytics, UAV imagery, camera trap deep learningOperational in partsCloud cover; false positives; limited endemic species librariesMulti-source data fusion; improved wildfire discrimination models; expanded reference datasets
Sericulture quality assessment and traceabilityImage-based cocoon grading; blockchain traceability systemsPilot stageConnectivity limitations; trust and adoption barriersOffline-first traceability; cooperative-level deployment; user-friendly interfaces
Livestock health and traceabilityWearable sensors; computer vision; RFID and blockchain systemsPilot to early deploymentBreed-specific data gaps; integration with legacy systemsBreed-adapted models; offline data synchronization; integration with national veterinary platforms
Note: Maturity levels are assessed qualitatively based on reported deployment status in the reviewed literature.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Saxena, A.; Faiq, M.; Ghatrehsamani, S.; Zahra, S.R. Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Sustainable Development in Agriculture and Allied Sectors of the Temperate Himalayas. AgriEngineering 2026, 8, 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering8010035

AMA Style

Saxena A, Faiq M, Ghatrehsamani S, Zahra SR. Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Sustainable Development in Agriculture and Allied Sectors of the Temperate Himalayas. AgriEngineering. 2026; 8(1):35. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering8010035

Chicago/Turabian Style

Saxena, Arnav, Mir Faiq, Shirin Ghatrehsamani, and Syed Rameem Zahra. 2026. "Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Sustainable Development in Agriculture and Allied Sectors of the Temperate Himalayas" AgriEngineering 8, no. 1: 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering8010035

APA Style

Saxena, A., Faiq, M., Ghatrehsamani, S., & Zahra, S. R. (2026). Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Sustainable Development in Agriculture and Allied Sectors of the Temperate Himalayas. AgriEngineering, 8(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering8010035

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop