Next Article in Journal
Coil- and Plug-Assisted Transvenous Retrograde Obliteration (CARTO/PARTO) in the Treatment of Gastric Varices: A European Single Centre Experience
Previous Article in Journal
Sex Differences and Bmal1/Acetylcholine- or Bmal1/Noradrenaline-Mediated Effects of Blue Light Irradiation on Dextran-Sodium-Sulfate-Induced Ulcerative Colitis Model Mice
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Traditional Biomarkers in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Staged by Computed Tomography and Endoscopic Ultrasound: Is There Still a Role in the Molecular Era?

by
Maria Giulia Demarzo
*,
Chiara Facchini
,
Giuliana Rosa Bisso
,
Ciro Marrone
and
Maria Caterina Parodi
Interventional Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, IRCCS San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Gastrointest. Disord. 2024, 6(3), 733-741; https://doi.org/10.3390/gidisord6030049
Submission received: 3 June 2024 / Revised: 16 July 2024 / Accepted: 2 August 2024 / Published: 7 August 2024

Abstract

Serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (Ca19-9) is the only approved biomarker approved for the screening and diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (PC), but its value remains controversial. The aim of our study is to evaluate the role of CA 19-9 in the management of PC patients in jaundiced patients staged by both Computed Tomography (CT) and Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS). Additionally, we evaluated traditional cholestasis marker behavior. Medical records of 73 patients have been retrospectively reviewed. We considered tumor size, tumor stage, CA 19-9, cytolysis, and cholestasis biomarkers. All patients underwent CT scan for staging. EUS +/− fine-needle biopsy (FNB) was performed in doubtful cases. Median alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and y-glutamyltransferase (GGT) levels were significantly lower compared to baseline after the biliary drainage (204 vs. 465 U/L, p < 0.0001, 204. U/L vs. 608.5, p < 0.0001, respectively), whilst no differences were observed for CA 19-9 levels. CA 19-9 showed significant association with the tumor stage in the pre-drainage setting. CT and EUS showed a low agreement in estimating tumor size (mean difference 4.8 mm 95% LoA −10.82–20.38). We did not find any significant correlation between CA 19-9 and bilirubin levels (r = −0.05, p = 0.7). In our cohort, survival rate was lower in patients with higher CA 19-9 levels (log rank p = 0.007). CA 19-9 has some limitations as a biomarker in the PC setting, thus it cannot address the treatment strategy alone. Nonetheless, it provides valuable information, and is not replaceable for the time being.
Keywords: pancreatic cancer; CA 19-9; biomarkers; EUS; tumor staging pancreatic cancer; CA 19-9; biomarkers; EUS; tumor staging

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Demarzo, M.G.; Facchini, C.; Bisso, G.R.; Marrone, C.; Parodi, M.C. Traditional Biomarkers in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Staged by Computed Tomography and Endoscopic Ultrasound: Is There Still a Role in the Molecular Era? Gastrointest. Disord. 2024, 6, 733-741. https://doi.org/10.3390/gidisord6030049

AMA Style

Demarzo MG, Facchini C, Bisso GR, Marrone C, Parodi MC. Traditional Biomarkers in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Staged by Computed Tomography and Endoscopic Ultrasound: Is There Still a Role in the Molecular Era? Gastrointestinal Disorders. 2024; 6(3):733-741. https://doi.org/10.3390/gidisord6030049

Chicago/Turabian Style

Demarzo, Maria Giulia, Chiara Facchini, Giuliana Rosa Bisso, Ciro Marrone, and Maria Caterina Parodi. 2024. "Traditional Biomarkers in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Staged by Computed Tomography and Endoscopic Ultrasound: Is There Still a Role in the Molecular Era?" Gastrointestinal Disorders 6, no. 3: 733-741. https://doi.org/10.3390/gidisord6030049

APA Style

Demarzo, M. G., Facchini, C., Bisso, G. R., Marrone, C., & Parodi, M. C. (2024). Traditional Biomarkers in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Staged by Computed Tomography and Endoscopic Ultrasound: Is There Still a Role in the Molecular Era? Gastrointestinal Disorders, 6(3), 733-741. https://doi.org/10.3390/gidisord6030049

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop