Previous Article in Journal
Reassessing an Early Medieval Rural Mosque in Al-Andalus: New Insights from Building Archaeology Analysis of the Cortijo de Las Mezquitas (Málaga, Spain)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

From Stone to Standards: A Digital Heritage Interoperability Model for Armenian Epigraphy Within the Leiden and EpiDoc Frameworks

by
Hamest Tamrazyan
1,*,
Gayane Hovhannisyan
2 and
Arsen Harutyunyan
3,4,5
1
Digital Humanities Laboratory, College of Digital Humanities, EPFL, INN 116, Station 14, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
2
Department of Applied Linguistics, European University of Armenia, 10 Davit Anhaght, Yerevan 0014, Armenia
3
Department of Epigraphy, Institute of Archeology and Ethnography, NAS AR—15 Charentes Street, Yerevan 0025, Armenia
4
Yerevan State University, Alek Manukyan 1, Yerevan 0025, Armenia
5
Matenadaran—Mestop Mashtots Research Institute of Ancient Manuscripts, 53 Mesrop Mashtoc Avenue, Yerevan 0009, Armenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Heritage 2026, 9(1), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage9010027
Submission received: 28 October 2025 / Revised: 26 November 2025 / Accepted: 27 November 2025 / Published: 13 January 2026

Abstract

This study investigates Armenian editorial conventions for inscriptions and evaluates their compatibility and the possibility of their further integration with international standards of epigraphic editing for open access and equal use. It focuses on the Divan Hay Vimagrut’yan (Corpus of Armenian Epigraphy), launched in the 1960s, which introduced a systematic apparatus for distinguishing diplomatic transcriptions from interpretative reconstructions. Later Armenian publications often simplified these conventions, replacing specialized signs with typographic substitutes. While these changes improved accessibility, they also reduced palaeographic precision and created inconsistencies across editions. Through comparative analysis with the Leiden Conventions and the EpiDoc TEI framework, the research identifies both areas of alignment and points of divergence. Armenian conventions handle missing letters, restorations, redundancies, and abbreviations in distinctive ways, sometimes reassigning the meaning of symbols across different publications. This variation, if not explicitly documented, complicates digital encoding and risks loss of information. Methodologically, this study develops a digital heritage interoperability model that translates local Armenian editorial practices into machine-actionable standards, enabling their integration into international infrastructures such as EpiDoc and FAIR-based cultural heritage systems. The principal contribution of this work is the proposal of a dual-track encoding strategy. One track applies a granular mapping of Armenian signs to the full set of Leiden and EpiDoc categories, ensuring maximum interoperability. The other track preserves a simplified schema faithful to Armenian usage, reflecting local scholarly traditions. Together, these approaches provide both international comparability and cultural specificity. The conclusion is that Armenian inscriptions can be effectively integrated into global digital infrastructures by means of transparent documentation, crosswalk tables, and encoding policies that follow FAIR principles. This ensures long-term preservation, machine-actionability, and the broader reuse of Armenian epigraphic data in comparative cultural heritage research.
Keywords: Armenian epigraphy; digital heritage; interoperability; EpiDoc TEI; FAIR data principles; Leiden Conventions; editorial conventions; digital encoding; cultural heritage standards; epigraphic data modeling Armenian epigraphy; digital heritage; interoperability; EpiDoc TEI; FAIR data principles; Leiden Conventions; editorial conventions; digital encoding; cultural heritage standards; epigraphic data modeling

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tamrazyan, H.; Hovhannisyan, G.; Harutyunyan, A. From Stone to Standards: A Digital Heritage Interoperability Model for Armenian Epigraphy Within the Leiden and EpiDoc Frameworks. Heritage 2026, 9, 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage9010027

AMA Style

Tamrazyan H, Hovhannisyan G, Harutyunyan A. From Stone to Standards: A Digital Heritage Interoperability Model for Armenian Epigraphy Within the Leiden and EpiDoc Frameworks. Heritage. 2026; 9(1):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage9010027

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tamrazyan, Hamest, Gayane Hovhannisyan, and Arsen Harutyunyan. 2026. "From Stone to Standards: A Digital Heritage Interoperability Model for Armenian Epigraphy Within the Leiden and EpiDoc Frameworks" Heritage 9, no. 1: 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage9010027

APA Style

Tamrazyan, H., Hovhannisyan, G., & Harutyunyan, A. (2026). From Stone to Standards: A Digital Heritage Interoperability Model for Armenian Epigraphy Within the Leiden and EpiDoc Frameworks. Heritage, 9(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage9010027

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop