Digital Innovation for the Documentation, Management, and Fruition of Cultural Heritage
1. Introduction
2. Towards New Strategies for Heritage Management
2.1. AI-Driven 3D Photogrammetric Reconstruction
2.2. HBIM Methodologies and Implementation Challenges
2.3. Multimodal Data Integration and Visualisation Platforms
2.4. Semantic Modelling and Intangible Heritage
2.5. Interoperability, Standards, and Heritage Digital Twins
3. Reflections and Open Scenarios
- From Models to Ecosystems: There is a notable shift from the production of static 3D models to the development of dynamic, interoperable systems—true digital ecosystems capable of supporting CH sites with a holistic approach (heritage documentation, monitoring, conservation, and communication simultaneously) [17]. The “Pitti Data Model”, for instance [26], illustrates how custom information frameworks can be semantically aligned with international standards (IndoorGML, CityGML), offering strategies that can be replicable for complex heritage sites.
- Systems Thinking and Strategic Planning: As detailed in the two-part series by [18,19], the contributions introduce a new methodological approach that has long been missing in heritage digitisation. The user needs were considered as the base of the system requirements, avoiding approaches based on technology as an end in itself and opening new perspectives for structured and sustainable digital heritage infrastructures.
- Multiscale and Multivectorial Integration: Across the contributions, it is possible to observe the increasing capacity to operate across spatial and temporal scales—from single elements to entire historic centres—while integrating several data types such as materials, rituals, spatial semantics, and environmental metrics [21,22,23,24]. The integration of different kinds of data supports not only comprehensive documentation but also spatial analysis, risk assessment, and conservation planning.
- Enriching Models with Intangible Heritage: In [25], the potential of digital tools goes beyond materiality, encoding cultural behaviours and rituals into HBIM environments. This approach goes towards the interpretive and experiential scope of heritage models and reinforces the link between space and meaning.
- Toward FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability) principles, open-source solutions, and participatory data: A growing emphasis on interoperability, controlled vocabularies, the use of open-source technologies, and adherence to the FAIR principles signals a positive trend toward collaborative, sustainable, and reusable digital heritage resources. These principles are necessary to enable long-term knowledge transfer, scholarly validation, and community participation.
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Khalil, A.; Stravoravdis, S. Challenges of Digital Building Data Usage with a Focus on the Digital Documentation of Heritage Buildings: Results from an Online Survey. Heritage 2022, 5, 3220–3259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagy, G.; Ashraf, F. HBIM platform and smart sensing as a tool for monitoring and visualizing energy performance of heritage buildings. Dev. Built Environ. 2021, 8, 100056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Megahed, N.A. Towards a Theoretical Framework for HBIM Approach in Historic Preservation and Management. Int. J. Archit. 2015, 9, 130–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guzmán, P.C.; Roders, A.P.; Colenbrander, B.J.F. Measuring links between cultural heritage management and sustainable urban development: An overview of global monitoring tools. Cities 2017, 60, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quintilla-Castán, M.; Martínez-Aranda, S.; Agustín-Hernández, L. Digital 3D inventory for the promotion and conservation of the architectural heritage. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2022, 48, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pocobelli, D.P.; Boehm, J.; Bryan, P.; Still, J.; Grau-Bové, J. BIM for Heritage Science: A Review. Herit. Sci. 2018, 6, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Grussenmeyer, P.; Koehl, M.; Macher, H.; Murtiyoso, A.; Landes, T. Review of Built Heritage Modelling: Integration of HBIM and Other Information Techniques. J. Cult. Herit. 2020, 46, 350–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Li, B. Heritage Building Information Modelling (HBIM): A Review of Published Case Studies. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2024, XLVIII-1-2024, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pellis, E.; Masiero, A.; Betti, M.; Tucci, G.; Grussenmeyer, P. A Deep Learning Multiview Approach for the Semantic Segmentation of Heritage Building Point Clouds. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 2025, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matrone, F.; Grilli, E.; Martini, M.; Paolanti, M.; Pierdicca, R.; Remondino, F. Comparing Machine and Deep Learning Methods for Large 3D Heritage Semantic Segmentation. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galantucci, R.A.; Musicco, A.; Verdoscia, C.; Fatiguso, F. Machine Learning for the Semi-Automatic 3D Decay Segmentation and Mapping of Heritage Assets. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 2023, 19, 389–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- La Guardia, M.; Koeva, M.; D’Ippolito, F.; Karam, S. 3D data integration for web based open source WebGL interactive visualization. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2022, 48, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aricò, M.; Dardanelli, G.; La Guardia, M.; Lo Brutto, M. Three-Dimensional Documentation and Virtual Web Navigation System for the Indoor and Outdoor Exploration of a Complex Cultural Heritage Site. Electronics 2024, 13, 2833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaspari, F.; Ioli, F.; Barbieri, F.; Rivieri, C.; Dondi, M.; Pinto, L. Rediscovering Cultural Heritage sites by interactive 3D exploration: A practical review of open-source WebGL tools. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 2023, 48, 661–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spreafico, A.; Chiabrando, F.; Della Coletta, C. 3D WebGIS Applications for Digital Humanities Studies: The Turin 1911 Project. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2023, XLVIII-M-2, 1501–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pepe, M.; Alfio, V.S.; Costantino, D. Assessment of 3D Model for Photogrammetric Purposes Using AI Tools Based on NeRF Algorithm. Heritage 2023, 6, 5719–5731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sampaio, A.Z.; Tomé, J.; Gomes, A.M. Heritage Building Information Modelling Implementation First Steps Applied in a Castle Building: Historic Evolution Identity, Data Collection and Stratigraphic Modelling. Heritage 2023, 6, 6472–6493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lovell, L.J.; Davies, R.J.; Hunt, D.V.L. A Systems Thinking Approach to the Development of HBIM: Part 1—The Problematic Situation. Heritage 2025, 8, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lovell, L.J.; Davies, R.J.; Hunt, D.V.L. A Systems Thinking Approach to the Development of Historic Building Information Modelling: Part 2—Definition of Requirements. Heritage 2025, 8, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lovell, L.J.; Davies, R.J.; Hunt, D.V.L. The Application of Historic Building Information Modelling (HBIM) to Cultural Heritage: A Review. Heritage 2023, 6, 6691–6717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angheluță, L.M.; Popovici, A.I.; Ratoiu, L.C. A Web-Based Platform for 3D Visualization of Multimodal Imaging Data in Cultural Heritage Asset Documentation. Heritage 2023, 6, 7381–7399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gaspari, F.; Barbieri, F.; Fascia, R.; Ioli, F.; Pinto, L. An Open-Source Web Platform for 3D Documentation and Storytelling of Hidden Cultural Heritage. Heritage 2024, 7, 517–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aricò, M.; La Guardia, M.; Lo Brutto, M. 3D Data Integration for Web Fruition of Underground Archaeological Sites: A Web Navigation System for the Hypogeum of Crispia salvia (Marsala, Italy). Heritage 2023, 6, 5899–5918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pepe, M.; Palumbo, D.; Dewedar, A.K.H.; Spacone, E. Toward to Combination of GIS-HBIM Models for Multiscale Representation and Management of Historic Center. Heritage 2024, 7, 6966–6980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Teppati Losè, L.; Rinaudo, F. 3D Representation of Rituals in HBIM: The Central Pillar and Fire Pit Space in the Tibetan-Yi Corridor. Heritage 2024, 7, 7273–7297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meucci, A.; Bonora, V.; Fiorini, L.; Conti, A.; Corongiu, M.; Romanelli, S.; Tucci, G. Mapping an Information Model for Historic Built Heritage into the IndoorGML Standard: The Case of the Pitti Palace. Heritage 2025, 8, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
La Guardia, M.; Koeva, M.; Lo Brutto, M. Digital Innovation for the Documentation, Management, and Fruition of Cultural Heritage. Heritage 2025, 8, 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8080292
La Guardia M, Koeva M, Lo Brutto M. Digital Innovation for the Documentation, Management, and Fruition of Cultural Heritage. Heritage. 2025; 8(8):292. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8080292
Chicago/Turabian StyleLa Guardia, Marcello, Mila Koeva, and Mauro Lo Brutto. 2025. "Digital Innovation for the Documentation, Management, and Fruition of Cultural Heritage" Heritage 8, no. 8: 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8080292
APA StyleLa Guardia, M., Koeva, M., & Lo Brutto, M. (2025). Digital Innovation for the Documentation, Management, and Fruition of Cultural Heritage. Heritage, 8(8), 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8080292