Next Article in Journal
Geoheritage and Cultural Heritage Interface in a Place of Worship: The Historical Development of the Monumental Complex of San Francesco le Moniche in Aversa (Italy) and Its Underground Artificial Cavities
Previous Article in Journal
Rare Earth Elements to Control Bone Diagenesis Processes at Rozafa Castle (Albania)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Contributions to the Morphogenesis, Inventory, and Valorization of a Unique Speleological Geomorphosite from Miresii Cave—The Large Key of Dâmbovița, the Corridor Bran—Dragoslave (Romania)

1
Faculty of Geography, “Babeș Bolyai” University, 5-7 Clinicilor Street, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
Subsidiary Geography Section, Romanian Academy Cluj-Napoca, 9 Republicii Street, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
3
Academy of Romanian Scientists, Ilfov 3, 050044 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Heritage 2024, 7(10), 5814-5838; https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7100274
Submission received: 2 September 2024 / Revised: 14 October 2024 / Accepted: 15 October 2024 / Published: 17 October 2024

Abstract

:
The present study contributes to the morphogenesis of the Miresii Cave, located in Cheia Mare of Dâmbovița in the area of the Bran—Dragoslavele Corridor, an important tourist axis in Romania. The main aim of the research is the proposal to the Scientific Council of Piatra Craiului National Park to bring to the attention of the national decision-making commissions that the cave be declared a natural monument. The inventory of this speleological geomorphosite suggested its inclusion in a thematic geotouristic circuit integrated into national and EU-protected natural areas. The novelty of the present research lies in the fact that the cave has never been studied before, being difficult to access. This cave, spatially found in the strict protection zone of the national park, is not included in its management plan. When being integrated into other nature protection areas, it is necessary to exclude any form of recreational tourism so that the cave can be exploited as a geotouristic resource strictly for research and educational purposes. The morphogenetic analysis of the cave, based on the information synthesized from geomorphological and geological literature, allowed us to decipher the morphological individualization of Miresii Cave in the local and regional geocronomorphological context, in accordance with the chronological separation of the karstification phenomenon manifested first in phreatic and later in vadose karst. The diversified typology of speleothems has been rendered according to the geomorphologic generating processes. The identification of the Rhinolophus ferrumequinum chiropteran colony and observations of its biotope highlighted the ecological significance of the cave. The inventory of the individuals of the colony led to the conclusion that the cave harbors one of the first two largest bat communities of this species in the national park and the adjacent depressional corridor. The present study may allow the documentation of the photographs and description of the geomorphosite integrated into the proposed thematic circuit to be included on billboards and in promotional brochures. Thus, it could also be useful for the decision-making authorities of Rucar and Podu Dâmboviței villages, which are interested in making decisions related to the promotion of geotourism, especially due to the existence of numerous geological and geomorphological tourist resources in the administrative territories.

1. Introduction

Miresii Cave [1] from the village of Rucăr (Argeș County, Romania) is a speleological geomorphosite [2] of landscape, speophysical, zoospeological (Chiroptera) and paleontological (marine invertebrates) relevance, integrated into some protected natural areas of the Piatra Craiului Mountains and the Bran—Dragoslavele Corridor, subunits of relief in the Southern Carpathians (Transylvanian Alps) [3], Romania. Named also Peștera Fecioarei Cave [4], it is located in a limestone erosion marker of Mount Posada, on the right slope of the lower gorge (Cheia Mare or Cheia de Jos) of the Dâmbovița River (Figure 1a), opening on the eastern face of Stâncii Miresei at an absolute altitude of 880 m, relative altitude of 98 m to the cliff top and relative altitude of 158 m to the Dâmbovița riverbed.
The Dâmbovița River, in the Cheii Mari sector, deepens in Jurassic limestones and delimits Mount Posada (1021 m) to the west, Mount Ghimbav (Vf. Colții Ghimbav, 1406.6 m) to the east and Mount Vârtoapele (1434 m) to the south. Cheia Mare of Dâmboviței is included in the central compartment of the low mountain area of the Bran—Dragoslavele corridor and connects the Podu Dâmboviței depression at the northern end, located upstream, with the Rucar at the southwestern end. This key sector became part of the geological and geomorphological nature reserve “Karst area Cheile Dâmbovița—Dâmbovicioara—Brusturet” (RNGG1) before its inclusion in the area of Piatra Craiului National Park (PNPC), by a 1972 decision of the People’s Council of Argeș County, in accordance with Law No. 4/1972 on the management of forests under the direct administration of municipalities [5]. Later, in accordance with Law no. 5/2000 on the approval of the National Spatial Plan—Section III—Protected Areas [6], the reserve was included in the strict protection zone of the PNPC by legislating the extension of the original surface of the national park.
In 2007, in accordance with Ministerial Order no. 1964 on the establishment of the regime of protected natural areas of sites of Community importance, as an integral part of the Natura 2000 European ecological network in Romania [7], a large part of the PNPC territory was integrated into the Natura 2000 European ecological network. Thus, Cheia Mare of Dâmbovița was also included in the protection area of the Site of Community Importance ROSCI 0194 Piatra Craiului.
Considered a geomorphosite, Miresii Cave proves to be a remarkable geotouristic resource, both for its structural values (geomorphologic, aesthetic and ecological), which are often displayed with superiority compared to the other explored and/or investigated cavities in the mountainous area of the Bran—Dragoslavele Corridor, and for its functional value related to the potential scientific relevance. The latter, in their turn, certify the first-rate significance of the geomorphosite in the region (together with the Bear Cave in Cheia Mica of Dâmbovița) due to its scientific potential (speophysical, zoospeological and paleontological) and its educational importance as a training resource with a high addressability for the fields of interest, having the attributes of a model with exemplary value. [8] The presence of an important bat colony and the location of the speosite in the strict protection zone of the PNPC, integrated with other protected natural areas, excludes any form of recreational tourism. Miresii Cave will be able to be exploited as a geotouristic resource, for research and educational purposes only, with access on the basis of a permit issued by the national park administration.
In the wider area of the Bran—Dragoslavele Corridor (which also includes the Podu Dâmboviței—Rucar geographical area), the structural (geomorphological, aesthetic and ecological) and functional (scientific, cultural and economic) values of the geomorphosites, paleontological geosites and archaeospeosites call for research, protection and conservation measures. Further research may cover natural science fields such as geology, physical speleology, zoospeleology, archaeology, etc. Some of the geomorphosites may also be approved for tourism, both for recreation and leisure and for certain cultural activities. As far as tourism with cultural concerns is concerned, the major purpose will be enhanced by emphasizing its educational importance. From a didactic but also practical point of view, geological and geomorphological natural objectives can be integrated into geotouristic circuits with a specialized theme close to international trends in geoturism.
Therefore, we propose that the caving geomorphosite Peștera Miresii, one of the geotouristic objectives within the Podu Dâmboviței—Rucar geographical area, be included in the thematic geotouristic circuit entitled “The Road of the gorges and caves of the upper Dâmbovița basin” (Dâmbovița Valley axis), integrated with some natural areas protected at national and community level. The association of several caves with diversified scientific relevance and/or didactic importance, located along the Dâmbovița gorges (Mica and Mare), as well as the presence of some key type of valley sectors on the tributaries in the immediate vicinity (Dâmbovicioara, Cheia, Ghimbav Valley and Orăți Valley with the limestone torrent “Cheia Orății”), suggested us the idea of proposing this spectacular geotouristic circuit. The circuit includes, only in the geographical area shown on the map (Figure 2), the following geotouristic objectives: six linear geosites as morphologic sectors of key type valleys (Table 1) and seven speleological geosites (Table 2). To these are added the following: Movila Neamțului (horst) complex geomorphosite with the Oratea (Neamțului) Fortress and “Drumul de Care” (medieval road segment), “Babele Orății” geomorphologic objective (both in the village of Podu Dâmboviței), the thematic somital viewpoint “Vârful Pleașa” (1071.6 m) and three geosites with paleontological relevance [9] included in the thematic geotouristic circuit “The fossil nests of the Tethys Sea in the Moieciu—Dâmbovicioara—Rucar area”.
The imagined geotouristic circuits included in the wider framework of the Bran—Dragoslavele Corridor (on the administrative territories of the communes of Moieciu, Fundata, Dâmbovicioara and Rucar) will be an integral part of two nature reserves, one of which is an existing one (RNGG1, included in the strict protection zone of the Piatra Craiului National Park, category Ib of the International Union for Conservation of Nature), and the second one, we propose to establish (RNGG2—the geological and geomorphological nature reserve “Moieciu—Fundata—Dâmbovicioara—Rucăr geological and geomorphological complex”, category IV IUCN). This new protected natural area will be established in accordance with GEO No. 57 of 20 June 2007, on the regime of protected natural areas, conservation of natural habitats, wild flora and fauna [12], supplemented with the clarifications of Law No. 49 of 7 April 2011 [13]. Tourists arriving in the future protected area (RNGG2) will be able to collect information in the field of geotourism from the Dâmbovicioara Tourist Information and Promotion Center (with current information competencies related to cultural, recreational and rural tourism) existing in the locality of Podu Dâmboviței (commune of Dâmbovicioara), established in 2015. The proposed nature reserve would bring together speleological and gorge geomorphosites, geosites of particular paleontological relevance (fossil invertebrates belonging to the Tethys Sea), paleolithic archaeosites and thematic somital belvederes.
The development of geotourism in the area of the Bran—Dragoslavele Corridor requires the existence of such thematic geotouristic circuits, with adequate promotion through brochures and information panels. Brochures promoting geosites should fulfill the “6 Fs” rule: familiarization, fascination, functionality, loyalty, formation and fusion [14].
The geological and geomorphological objectives inventoried in the Podu Dâmboviței—Rucar geographical area are only a part of all the other geological and geomorphological objectives in the entire geographical area of the depressional corridor mentioned above. We bring to your attention that the proposals for the development of geotourism in the Podu Dâmboviței—Rucar geographical area are part of our broader concerns, which are included in our doctoral thesis entitled “Bran—Rucar—Dragoslavele corridor. Applied geomorphology study”.
It should be noted that Miresii Cave is not included in the Management Plan of the PNPC and the Natura 2000 Site ROSCI 0194 Piatra Craiului published on 21 February 2020 [15], and has not been studied so far due to the fact that it is only accessible to explorers with specific climbing skills and equipment. For these reasons, in situ research, including the present study, has acquired a novel character.
The access to the Miresii Cave from the Dâmbovița Valley was opened on a climbing route pythonized in the late 1970s of the last century by a team of the Argeș—Câmpulung Muscel Mountain Rescue Service, according to the report of the Speology Circle “Piatra Craiului” Câmpulung Muscel in the Central Speology Commission Bulletin no. 4, 1980 [16]. The ascending route has lost its viability, being not recommended more than 40 years after its inauguration. The access from the upper part of Miresei Rock (Figure 1b) is only recommended for explorers with a thorough knowledge of rock climbing, abseiling and handling technical climbing equipment.
The geographical position of the cave entrance, 45°23′46.75″ N, 25°11′58.10″ E, was marked with GPS via Google Earth mobile phone application on a limestone platform below the portal arch level, approximately right at the cave access, at the nearest available signal.

2. Materials and Methods

Explored since 24 August 1979 by members of the “Cercului Speo Câmpulung” (information plaque at the entrance), the cave has been visited by 3 other teams of climbers (in the summer of 1983, 26 May 2013 and 8 November 2015), but the studies started after our observations in 2020, during three campaigns of drone filming from outside. Our access to the cave in the fall of 2021 allowed us to take speophysical measurements and photographs to decipher morphology and morphogenesis, identify the chiropteran species/species, and assess the conservation status of the colony in its local biotope.
Considering the isolation of the Miresii Cave towards the middle of a slope of about 260 m, almost vertical, in order to reveal the morphology of the facade corresponding to the access portal in the karst system to be investigated and to observe the erosion witness Stânca Miresei Rock seen as a whole, we imagined and undertook three campaigns of drone filming.
The first campaign, on 12 September 2020, was mainly aimed at making observations on the longitudinal lithoclase of the cave’s path, the morphology of the portal and the evaluation of the access possibilities to the entrance of the underground cavity from the Dâmbovița Valley, on a classic climbing route as smooth as possible. In order to achieve the specified objectives, we used a radio-controlled homemade drone, which had the advantage of maneuverability towards the desired altitude and location on the right slope of the Dâmbovița’s Great Pass without encountering problems related to the interruption of the remote-controlled signal. The disadvantages consisted of the quality of the images captured, temporarily blocked by sunlight and partially distorted due to the curvature of the objective lens.
The second campaign, on 20 September 2020, facilitated observations in the upper third of the Miresei Rock to assess the access possibilities to the entrance of the underground cavity from the top of the Miresei Rock. A panoramic image was captured of the eastern façade (Figure 1b), corresponding to the orientation of the Miresii Cave portal, marked by diaclases that facilitated the penetration of water into the Kimmeridgian–Tithonian limestone mass (Upper Valanginian). To achieve the above objectives, we used the DJI Mavic Air 2 drone (Figure 3a) launched from 2.8 km away from the Sasului Hill towards the upper part of the Cheii Mari of the Dâmbovița.
The use of drones is of particular importance in the methodological and scientific approach due to the fact that access to the analyzed cave is very difficult, and mapping them starting from the base of the cave entrance would be impossible because the opening is very high and could not be charted by traditional methods. The possibility of exploration from a distance based on the panoramic image made by the drone highlights its tourist potential despite the difficult access and also highlights the need to implement niche tourism with minimum conditions of development to reduce the anthropogenic impact on the geomorphosite analyzed.
The third campaign, on 3 October 2020, was the occasion to make observations on the basin of the mouth of the calcareous torrent deep north of Miresei Cliff, with possible access to the water access to the Miresii Cave.
On 29 October 2021, laser topography of the Iatacul Miresii Cave was possible using the Leica Disto X310 rangefinder (Figure 3b). The measurements taken were processed using the TopoDroid v.5.1.40 mobile phone application (Figure 3d), and the longitudinal profile was drawn by computer graphic modeling in the program CorelDRAW Graphics Suite X3 (Figure 3e) based on the results of the laser measurements. The access and humidity conditions inside the cave led to the use of digital measuring instruments that could be adapted to the specific conditions and, at the same time, meet the final purpose of the mapping. The use of the distomat allowed measurements to be made both on height for mapping the interior of the cave and on height for mapping the ceiling of the cave, which could not be achieved with classical measurement methods. The use of laser-based mapping also increases the accuracy of the measurements by reducing errors and offering the possibility to realize an in situ sketch based on specific software, which was the basis for the final mapping of the geomorphosite.
Exploration of the interior of the Miresii Cave was possible on 31 October 2021. The longitudinal profile and the floor plan of the Miresii Cave were also realized by computer graphic modeling using in situ measured values, averaged by the Bosch DLE 70 Professional rangefinder and 30 m ruler (Figure 3c).
The morphotectonics of the Podu Dâmboviței—Rucar geographical area was deciphered by interpreting the information inscribed on the geological maps, scale 1:50,000 [17,18], but also based on the information summarized from the specialized geological literature.
The leveling surfaces of the Podu Dâmboviței—Rucar geographical area were digitized from cartographic supports coming from previous research. The existing information in the geomorphological literature was synthesized in the following sources: geomorphological map of the Rucar—Podu Dâmboviței region [19] and geomorphological sketch of the Podu Dâmboviței—Rucar region [20]. The geological map of the Bucegi Massif and the Dâmbovicioara corridor, scale 1:50,000 [17], was useful for mapping the terrace bridges in the Podu Dâmboviței depression. To this last information, we added our contributions regarding the following: the mapping of the lower terrace of the Dâmbovița river within the mentioned depression; the correct spatial positioning on the topographic map, scale 1:25,000 [21], of the digitized areas in order to correlate them with morphological elements; and the superposition of the digitized areas on the georeferenced geological map, in order to correlate the morphogenetic steps with lithology and some morphotectonic elements.
The digital elevation model (DEM) used for the creation of the topographic database of the Podu Dâmboviței—Rucar geographical area was designed with a spatial resolution of 10 m and a discretization error correction coefficient of 0.5 by interpolating the leveling and drainage network taken from the topographic map, scale 1:25,000, with the equidistance of contour lines equal to 10 m. The interpolation method was implemented in the ArcGIS/ArcMap program, accessible through the Topo to Raster tool, based on the ANUDEM program developed by Michael Hutchinson in 1988, 1989, 1996, 2000 and 2011 [22].
Based on the DEM, a geomorphologic cross-sectional profile was constructed through the Cheia Mare of the Dâmbovița River, approximately on the alignment of the Miresii Cave diaclase, using the dedicated tool Path Profile, available in the Global Mapper v.20.0 application. The rendered profile allowed us to visualize the altitudinal position of the Miresii Cave on the right slope of the Great Dâmbovița Gorge in relation to the position and altitude of the valley shoulders (witnesses of the previous leveling/leveling of the valley relief). The positional correlations (altitudinal and on the map surface) between the Miresii Cave and the leveling surfaces in the Podu Dâmboviței and Rucar depressions, together with morphotectonic and geomorphological observations in the field, allowed us to decipher the morphological individualization of the Miresii Cave in the local and regional geocronomorphological context, in accordance with the chronological separation of the karstification phenomenon by chronological stages.

3. Results

3.1. Geological Features

According to the geological map of the R.S.R., scale 1:50,000, sheet 110 c Rucar L-35-87-C [18], Dâmbovița created its Cheia Mare by deepening into Jurassic limestones of Kimmeridgian (152.1 ± 0.9–157.3 ± 1 million years before present), Tithonian (145–152.1 ± 0.9 m. a. BP) [23] and Upper Valanginian age. They are massive and banked white limestones, which are part of the sedimentary package of the Posada and Ghimbav mountains.
Strictly locally, the calcareous marker that hosts the Miresii Cave of Mount Posada consists of massive coastal shelf carbonate deposits with micritic, reefy, less frequently brecciated, reefy facies. In the “Coral Gallery”, the texture of bioconstructed limestones can be observed, predominantly bioconstructed by colonial reef corals (Figure 4) that lived on the warm-water shelves of the Tethys Sea (ocean). Fossils of the outer skeleton of coral polyp external skeletons (Kimmeridgian or Tethonian age) were evidenced by erosion and selective dissolution. Stratigraphically, the mentioned calcareous accumulation belongs to the Cheile Dâmboviței Formation [24] and is at least 260 m thick measured from the Dâmbovița riverbed to the top of the cliff, on the lithoclastic alignment that conditioned the formation and evolution of the Miresii Cave.
The geologic maps, scale 1:50,000 [17,18], provided sufficient clues to decipher the morphotectonics of Mount Posada. The uplift of the sedimentary cover by the thrust exerted by the crystalline bedrock of the Leaota Mountains generated the fracturing of the carbonate plate and the entrainment of sedimentary blocks on the fault system. These rupture consequences were gradually outlined as an effect of the mesocretaceous (austric diastrophism), ante-Paleogene and post-Paleogene (Old Styric phase, blocky uplift of the Wallachian phase and Pasadena neotectonic movements) orogenetic manifestations. Structural compartments resulted in the following [17]: Pleașa horst, delimited by the vertical fault Pleașa-Nord and the fault Pleașa-Sud; the Muntele Posada horst, delimited by the faults Pleașa-Nord and two other faults, recorded on the map to the west, southwest and south, as well as by the fault Ghimbavu-Dealul Sasului delimiting the same horst to the southeast, on the territory of Muntele Ghimbav (west of the Cheia Mare of the Dâmbovița); and the Podul Dâmboviței graben and the Rucăr semigraben framing the above-mentioned horsts (Figure 5).
The limestones of the Miresei Rock, obviously tectonized, slope westwards and belong to the structure of the Posada Mountain horst. The eastern wall of the cliff is crisscrossed in depth by tectonic tension lithoclases [25] modeled by gelivation towards the face of the abrupt cliff on which it is exposed and by karstification within the limestone mass through which it crosses (Figure 1b). The tectonic tension fractures framing the cliff to the north and south were probably opened earlier, having been shaped by torrential erosion, snowflation, gelivation and karstification. Calcareous torrential valleys, tributary to the Dâmbovița Dâmbovița, were grafted along their course. The tectonic tension diaclases corresponding to the Miresii Cave (Figure 6a,c) is particularly noteworthy, which was modeled by torrential erosion and karst processes. It crosses the entire limestone marker up to the Dâmbovița riverbed, the current local water table, located at 722.5 m absolute altitude. It is very likely that this lithoclasis was initiated during the Wallachian phase movements, possibly even during the Pasadena phase. The argument in support of its youth is the narrowness of 2–10 cm in the lower sector (the first about 4–5 m from the bed of the Dâmbovița riverbed) and about 0.5–1.5 m up to the slope break located at about 18–20 m relative altitude, which emphasizes the effiltration of the talus of the limestone torrent descending from the cave, on the eastern face of the cliff. The opening of the diaclase generated the penetration of water from precipitation and/or melting snow, most probably concentrated at the mouth of the torrent on the northern flank of Miresei Rock, which deepened regressively to the south. The northern torrent head is in the form of a flared micro-depression, drained at an absolute altitude of ±960 m. The access through a sediment-laden water ponor is intuited to be in the center of the small basin at the head (Figure 6b). The water and transported sediments are the torrential shaping agents of the drained karst system. Sandy sedimentary deposits, probably allochthonous, were observed on the talus between the collapsed blocks of the ‘Coral Gallery’.
Another quasi-vertical tectonically tensioned quasi-vertical diaclase is located to the north and about 35 m level difference from the mouth of the Miresii Cave. It was widened by torrential erosion, less by karst processes. The cave developed along this water inlet and outlet path is named “Miresii Gorge” (Figure 7). It has a development (3D length) of 19.5 m, a plan length of 15 m, is slightly ascending and continues in depth along a path impenetrable by man. It falls within the upper zone of water infiltration and percolation, possibly to the Miresii Cave.

3.2. Geomorphologic Characteristics

The discovery and exploration of karst voids in the Muscelian limestone area has been the main object of activity of the “Piatra Craiului” Speleology Circle from Câmpulung Muscel, a club of amateur speleologists led with passion and intelligence by Ioan Dobrescu. Under his coordination, 2360 caves and caves have been discovered and explored [1]. The inventory made [4] for the Cheia Mare of Dâmbovița shows 50 caves on the right slope (Posada Mountain) and 86 caves on the left slope (Ghimbav Mountain). The Miresii Cave differs clearly from all other karst voids in its development (3D length) of 137 m, the height of the access portal and the average height of the cavity. For comparison, the average length value of the other 49 caves discovered on the right slope is 16.11 m, the longest of which is Chaos Cave No. 2, 39 m. Likewise, the average length of the 86 caves on the left slope is 17.08 m, the longest of them being the Stone Milk Cave of 117 m (40 m relative altitude), the next two measuring 86 m and 63 m. Of all the caves discovered in the area of the Bran—Dragoslavele Corridor, according to the 3D length criterion, the Miresii Cave occupies the seventh position, after the Wolf Cave of 147 m [11].
The main morphometric and morphographic aspects of the Miresii Cave were mainly derived from in situ measurements and observations.
The absolute elevation, measured at the location of the 3 m wide cross-section (Figure 8), at the floor level at the entrance is 880 m. The slope of the cave floor from downstream to upstream is +10–+11 m. The average height of the cave, 8.16 m, was obtained by averaging the values measured with a rangefinder, evenly distributed along its length.
The morphography and the dimensions of the spectacular portal of access to the cave give uniqueness and remarkable landscape value to this karst system, at least in the area of the Bucegi—Leaota Mountains and the Făgărașului Mountains (Făgăraș—Iezer) in the Southern Carpathians. The cave entrance (Figure 6c and Figure 8) is preceded by a majestic cave entrance (Figure 9a). The overall morphography of the cave vestibule is similar to the Gothic architectural style, with its ogival form framed by the arch. The outer portal, the ‘archway’, is 40 m high (perpendicular measured with a telemeter from the top of the limestone torrential valley with its mouth in the mouth of the cave to the highest point on the inner curvature of the arch of the ‘gate’) and 7 m wide measured at the base. The height of the Miresei Cave arch is comparable to that of the portals belonging to known caves in the Apuseni Mountains: Păpară’s Huda (Trascăului Mountains), 35 m and Coiba Mare (Bihor Mountains), 47 m [26]. The inner portal, ogival in shape, marks the entrance to the cave and has the dimensions 14.5 m high and 3 m wide measured at the base.
The inner morphology of the studied cave is revealed by the speleothem typology. On the overall morphological background of the cave, with four halls and a gallery, developed almost linearly on a diaclase, the genetic typology of its interior microrelief shows common forms and deposits, also found in other caves in the Romanian Carpathian area [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35].
The shapes resulting from erosion are represented by the narrow banks arranged on 3–4 levels along the “Coral Gallery”, observable in its transversal profile, above a lateral erosion level, well encrusted and identified at the height of about 1 m, evidence of the change in the level at which the water flowed during the torrential modeling episodes.
Among the negative forms of corrosion, the pressure corrosion marmite in the ceiling of the cave vestibule extended into the interior of the “Tentacle Crosnia” hall stands out. Ceiling marmites, few but large in size, associated with corrosion hieroglyphs, are also present in the last two spacious halls, the “Vestibule of the Throne Hall” and the “Throne Hall”.
The mixed forms of erosion and corrosion are concretized by the lateral (meandering) niches in the “Tentacle Crosnia” room. The outer portal of the cave is also a mixed form, resulting from erosion and freeze–thaw disintegration of the exposed rock in the walls of the tectonically formed lithoclast.
The drip forms are represented by conical stalactites and stalagmites (Figure 9a), anemolites and some columns. Speleothems that stand out in size and shape are The Great Column (from the “Throne Hall”, Figure 9b) and the cluster of eccentric stalactites (anemolites) called “La Tentacule” (from the “Tentacle Crosnia” hall, Figure 6c). The spatial arrangement of the drip forms along the length of the cave allowed us to observe a considerable increase in their density towards the upstream end (“Vestibule of the Throne Hall” and “Throne Hall”).
The most remarkable gravitational prelingement forms are the parietal crusts (leaks) that create the parietal draperies (“Cephalopod”) and the veils linked between the ceiling and the walls of the “Crosnia with Tentacles” hall, formed by the prelingement of water drops along the line of the steepest slope, a process accompanied by the lateral deposition of calcite along the entire route. The “Altar of the Bride” (4 m long and 1.8 m high), the final cavity in connection with the “Throne Room”, hosts spectacular forms of gravitational prelingement: on the ceiling—prelingement stalactites (Figure 10a); and on the walls or over the poles—parietal crusts developing colonnades, stologmites-stalactites and small draperies forming the “Altar Organ” formation (Figure 10b). At its base, calcium carbonate has accumulated on a semicircular stalagmitic alignment. On the stalagmitic floor (also extended in the “Throne Room”, Figure 9b), a small gour-type basin, with an area of a few square decimeters, was formed.
Deposits of clastic origin are represented by allochthonous accumulations of sand, collapsed and interlocked blocks (incision deposits) observable in the “Coral Gallery”, as well as centimetric fragments of collapsed limestone from the walls of the “Tentacle Crosnia” hall.

3.3. Ecological and Zoospeiological Characteristics

The access to the cave allowed us both to identify the chiropteran species and to make ecological observations on the resting and hibernation habitat of the existing colony. The Cave of Miresii Cave is home to an important bat community of the species Rhinolophus ferrumequinum–Schreber, 1774 (large horseshoe-nosed bat, Figure 11a,b). The overwintering, probably also gestation, colony was massed in the cave’s large upstream halls, the ‘Throne Hall Vestibule’ and ‘Throne Hall’, both with roughly conical-shaped guanophilic organic deposits (Figure 11c) on the floor. We note that the observations made on the dates 26 May 2013 (photo, Milea I. V.), 8 November 2015 (photo, Pepu E.) and 31 October 2021 (photo, Trif S.) were materialized by the photographic evidence taken at the site. Thus, on 8 November 2015, about 100 individuals were inventoried in the cavity hibernation colony (Figure 11a), the most ever counted.
A species of national and community interest, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum, like all chiropteran species in our country, is protected under Law no. 90 of 10 May 2000 for Romania’s accession to the “Agreement on the Conservation of Bats in Europe” [35], adopted in London on 4 December 1991. At the same time, according to Annex 3 of the GEO no. 57 of 20 June 2007, the great horseshoe-nosed bat is one of the 13 mammal species of the Chiroptera family, protected all year round, without restrictions.
In the management plan of the PNPC and the Natura 2000 Site ROSCI 0194 Piatra Craiului, it is stated that this bat is the largest rhinolophid (of the five Rhinolophidae species widespread in Romania) in the fauna of Romania and Europe. The habitat of the species extends in central Asia, but there are favorable environmental conditions for its survival, both in the central and southern parts of Europe and in northern Africa, near the Mediterranean coast. In the area of Patra Craiului National Park, the species is relatively widespread. It coexists in some caves within the park in distinct colonies, sometimes with at least 12 other species. However, it has small populations, forming colonies of only 4 to 15 individuals [36]. It is known, however, that this species can also form colonies of over a thousand individuals.
In the management plan republished on 1 March 2020 [37], according to Annex No. 19 (distribution maps for species of conservation concern), the distribution map of Rhinolophus ferrumequinum has been reproduced. It contains spatialized information based on field observations updated until July 2015. The spatialization illustrates two aspects: first—the extent of the favorable habitat of the species in the ROSCI 0194 and ROSPA 0165 area, almost over the entire surface of the Natura 2000 site, except for the high altitudes of the steep slopes of the main ridge of the Piatra Craiului Massif (subalpine—alpine domain); and second—the number of observation points (32) of the species and their spatial distribution. These observation points include four in the calcareous area of the slopes of the Piatra Craiului Massif, at the boundary between the forest and subalpine scrublands (e.g., Peștera Stanciului, 1685 m); seven in calcareous areas in the forest zone of the Piatra Craiului massif (e.g., P. din Padina Calului); three along the valley of the Zărneștilor River (e.g., P. din Diaclază); two in the Mica and Mare caves in the village of Peștera (P. cu Lilieci); five in the Brusturetului Gorges, the middle and upper Gorges of Dâmbovicioarei (e.g., P. Dâmbovicioara, P. Uscată din Valea Rea and P. Hoților); one in the lower Key of Dâmbovicioara (P. Despicătura); one in the Uluce Cave (Valea Rudărița); five in the Small (upper) Key of Dâmbovicioara (e.g., Peștera Urșilor); and four in the Big (Lower) Key of Dâmbovicioara. Our observations in the caves existing in the area of the Bran—Dragoslavele Corridor captured the presence of several individuals of this species also in the Posada cave (two individuals photographed on 8 November 2020).

4. Discussion

4.1. The Morphogenesis of the Miresii Cave

The morphogenesis of the Miresii Cave is closely related to the evolution of the Great Dâmbovița Gorge. The tower-shaped Stânca Miresei rock erosion marker in which the cave was modeled was detached on the right slope of the lower Dâmbovița gorge by the regressive deepening of two limestone streams flanking it to the north and south.
The detailed view of the eastern slope of the limestone marker was made on 12 September 2020 by a radio-controlled drone lifted from the Dâmbovița Valley bed. The images capture a longitudinal diabase in the limestone mass, centered approximately mid-surface of the eastern wall of the Miresei Rock. The fracture, slightly narrowed at the base, gradually widens in elevation to below the rounded vault of the outer portal. The fracture line is further up the steeply sloping (in some sections more than 75°), shrub-vegetated torrential valley (in some sections more than 75°), evident in the upper half of the slope, above the arch of the outer portal (Figure 1b). The certainty of the extension of the fracture in elevation (towards the somital part of the cliff), along the path of the vallecula above the arcade of the outer portal, is supported by the following: the dihedral plan of the slopes of the valley; the broken arched junction of the walls of the cave vestibule (Figure 12a) which gives the ogival shape to the inner portal (Figure 12b); and the morphography in the cross-section of the cave, resembling a house roof arranged in two steeply sloping waters, characteristic of the “Crosnia with Tentacles” hall (Figure 12c). As an upstream extension of this hall, the “Coral Gallery” is more than 8 m high, and its walls are arranged quasi-parallel. Moreover, the dripping forms, predominantly stalactites but also parietal crusts, are relatively evenly distributed along the entire length of the cave, observations that reveal the direction of infiltration–percolation water towards the lithoclase, as well as its action of dissolving, transporting and depositing calcium carbonate on the erosional forms of the karst system in the ford zone.
The association of numerous pressure–corrosion marmite (or dome) [27] in the ceiling of the vestibule with the vestibule ceiling is striking, even on the ascending route from the base of the outer portal. These have large diameters (±1 m), mostly arranged in alignments of 2 to 5 microforms (Figure 8) extending into the interior of the “Tentacle Crosnia” hall. Ceiling marmites, few but large in size, associated with corrosion hieroglyphs [25], are also present in the last two spacious halls: the “Vestibule of the Throne Hall” and the “Throne Hall”. The presence of the mentioned microforms is a strong argument in favor of the phreatic karstification phenomenon [28] within the first morphogenetic and morphosculptural stage (Stage I) of the cave.
Field observations have allowed us to accept the hypothesis that, since the Upper Pleistocene, the cave has evolved only in a vadose regime, in which episodes of torrential modeling (Stage II) were manifested. Arguments supporting this hypothesis are related to the following: the shape and dimensions of the access portal (40 m high and 7 m wide at the base), the generalized transversal profile of the cave (steep gabled roof shape), the slope of the floor from downstream to upstream (+10 m–+11 m, over a length of 133 m), a level of lateral erosion identified in the walls of the “Coral Gallery” (at the height of about 1 m), as well as the steeply sloping, regressively, evolved limestone torrential gully in the downstream extension of the cave floor to the outside.
In the Holocene, the predominant geomorphological processes remained that characteristic of karstification: deposition by dripping and gravitational leaching of calcium carbonate contained and precipitated in/from the saturated solution, originating from the infiltration and percolation zone.
The leveling surfaces of the geographical area corresponding to the Podu Dâmboviței and Rucar depressions have been established areal within the dedicated map (Figure 13) by summing, correlating and synthesizing all the existing information in the geomorphological and geological literature. Relevant contributions related to the deciphering of the geologic and paleogeomorphologic evolution of the Carpathian area corresponding to the Bran—Dragoslavele corridor were made by geographers [11,19,20,29] and a geologist [17]. We note that the Braniște Level [20] is identified only in the southern part of the Bran—Dragoslavele Corridor and occurs fragmentarily in the Podu Dâmboviței (the level cuts the sandstones of the Stoichii Hill, being distributed at altitudes of 850–900 m) and Rucăr (the level cuts the marls of the Braniște Hill, being distributed at altitudes of 800–850 m) depressions. Fragments of this level of Middle Pleistocene age [20] can also be observed along the Dâmbovița mountain valley in the form of valley shoulders framed at altitudes of 810–850 m. This Carpathian valley level [30] corresponds to the one mapped by Ielenicz at ±820 m in the Dâmbovița Valley [19] and to the one named by Mihăilescu as the “Râu Târgului surface” [31], located at the foot of the Iezer Massif, at least between the Argeș and Râul Târgului valleys (820–900 m).
The transverse geomorphologic profile of the valley traced at the location of the cave (Figure 14) shows its altitudinal position within the right slope of the gorge in relation to the position of the erosion shoulders belonging to the Gornovița II leveling surface (Moieciu level), a morphogenetic step from which the epigenigenic, regressive and fault-faulting deepening of the Paleo-Damboviet torrent with the base level located in the Podu Dâmboviței tectonic depression began [11].
The tectonic uplift of Mount Posada (horst), concomitant with the fault descent of the Podu Dâmboviței depression (graben), has boosted the process of regressive and deep erosion of the Dâmbovița River. The straight line distance between the vertical fault Pleașa-Nord and the corresponding lithoclase of the Miresii Cave is about 1 km. Thus, the continuous deepening of the Dambouvița in Cheia Mare imposed the local base level to which the torrential valleys, tributary to it, originating in Mount Posada (from the west) and Mount Ghimbav (from the east), have adapted evolutionarily. As a result, the vertical shaping of the Miresii Cave was dictated by the continuous lowering of the local base level of the Dambouvița Dambouvița in the Upper Pleistocene and Holocene. The absolute altitudinal position of the Miresii Cave on the right slope of the Dâmbovița’s Cheii Mari, at ±890 m, allows us to connect it with the Braniște Level, 800–900 m absolute altitude, represented by the fragments mapped within the Podu Dâmboviței and Rucăr depressions. The absolute altitudinal position of the cave, slightly higher than that of the Braniște Level, can be argued by the different local spatial evolution and opposite directions of the tectonic/neotectonic movements that have led to the rise of the Pleașa Mountain horst (with the Miresii Cave) and the descent of the Podu Dâmboviței graben, like the Rucar semi-graben, on proven faults.
The analysis of field observations and the synthesis of all geological and geomorphological data available in the specialized literature, so far, have allowed deciphering the morphological individualization of the Miresii Cave in the local (Podu Dâmboviței—Rucar in the Bran—Dragoslavele corridor) and regional (Iezer Massifs, Piatra Craiului and Leaota Mountains), in accordance with the chronological separation of the karstification phenomenon by chronological stages and in the context of anthropic pressure on the geomorphosite [38] (Table 3).
We are of the opinion that the first morphogenetic stage of the initial karst system modeling in a phreatic regime is correlated with the fragmentation stage of the Braniște Level, possibly from the Riss—Würm interglacial period, when the annual amount of liquid precipitation increased, and the flow of the hydrographic network was reinvigorated [32]. The above-mentioned phenomena were manifested against the background of the opening of the lithoclasis since the Wallachian phase or as a consequence of the neotectonic movements of the Pasadena phase. The relative altitudinal position of the cave in relation to the current bed of the Dâmbovița (about 160 m), the remarkable height of the outer portal, the evolved forms of dripping (“Marea Coloană” and “La Tentacule”), the steep declivity of the limestone torrential gully descending from the cave (directed on the diaclase which conditioned the access of water into the karst system) are evidence of the long evolution of karsts in the vadose karst regime, but which succeeded the phreatic one, as evidenced by the presence of numerous ceiling marmites, dissolving under pressure.

4.2. Ecological Value of Miresii Cave

On the basis of our observations, the few bibliographical sources currently existing [36] and until further research on the number of individuals in the colonies, we can state that Miresii Cave harbors one of the first two largest colonies of bats of the Rhinolophus ferrumequinum species in Piatra Craiului National Park and the adjacent depressional corridor, with at least 98–100 individuals identified in the hibernating colony in the “Sala Tronului” on 8 November 2015. The other habitat with numerous individuals of the same rhinolophid species is the Bear Cave (Cave of the Surpat Corner), within which photographs taken on 3 October 2020 and 31 October 2020 captured ca. 180 individuals. We note that the Bear Cave is home to two Rhinolophid species: Rhinolophus ferrumequinum and Rhinolophus hipposideros (small horseshoe-nosed bat).
The natural isolation of the cavity, located in the middle of a steep slope, about 260 m high, as well as the stable topoclimate of the last two large halls located at over 100 m depth, are favorable factors of the biotope for the protection of the Chiroptera community in Peștera Miresii. The cave offers ideal conditions of peace and privacy for the perpetuation of the inhabiting species/species. The external environment adjacent to the cave, with relatively unaltered attributes (preserved under the umbrella of the heritage management of the Piatra Craiului National Park and Natura 2000 site), facilitates the protection of foraging habitats for the time being, even though the pollution of the Dâmbovița River with plastic and the shrinking local cattle herd is a constant threat to the reduction in insect populations, as the main food resources for the great horseshoe-nosed bat.

5. Conclusions

Although it belongs to the area of a geological and geomorphological nature reserve since 1972, included in the strict protection zone of the Piatra Craiului National Park (2000) and the “Natura 2000” site ROSCI 0194 Piatra Craiului (2007), the name “Peștera Miresii” is not included in the management plan for the above-mentioned protected natural areas, because it has not been studied so far.
Following the associative analysis of the morphotectonic, morphostructural and local/regional morphogenetic landmarks, with the morphographic and morphometric landmarks determined in the field observation and measurement campaigns, it was possible to conclude that the Miresii Cave evolved through the succession of two distinct morphogenetic stages that imposed different manifestations of the karst phenomenon, each with its characteristic processes and forms: the first stage—karstification in the phreatic (drowned) regime, by the flow of water under pressure, as well as intense chemical corrosion (dissolution); and the second stage—karstification in the vadose regime, by the deepening and widening of the cavity towards the base, conditioned by the free-flowing water level, in torrential episodes, concomitant with the precipitation of calcium carbonate in the forms of dripping and gravitational preleakage. The generation of the forms of pressure corrosion, torrential erosion (and corrosion), chemical precipitation and clastic accumulation occurred along a tectonic stress diaclase, probably opened during block uplift movements in the Wallachian phase and reactivated during neotectonic movements in the Pasadena phase. The vertical evolution of the cave was conditioned by the dimensions of the diaclase that directed the water in the system, in conjunction with the permanent lowering of the local base level imposed by the continuous deepening of the Dâmbovița River in the Jurassic limestone package, along a fault.
Digital mapping using modern methods and techniques is an essential requirement for the digital mapping of the entire cave. The materialization of the proposals made for its introduction in the tourist circuit and protected areas would, first of all, imply its arrangement and providing access to its interior. This would make possible, in the future, monitoring of the cave with modern equipment and its 3D mapping using laser scanners and, last but not least, the VR promotion of the final result both through dedicated applications and online, which are the objectives of future research.
One of the purposes of the present research is to propose to the Scientific Council of the National Park/ROSCI 0194 Piatra Craiului that the general information about the cave be recorded in the management plan and, subsequently, the council to bring to the attention of the authorized and deciding national commissions (in accordance with Law no. 49 of 7 April 2011 for the approval of Government Emergency Ordinance no. 57/2007 on the regime of protected natural areas, conservation of natural habitats, wild flora and fauna) the following of the Miresii Cave:
  • To be included in protection class B—caves with sectors of national importance (in accordance with Article I, point 64 on the classification of caves or parts of caves according to the criteria of scientific and cultural-educational value);
  • To be established as a natural monument, IUCN category III (in accordance with Article I, point 68, on the classification of caves or parts of caves according to the purpose and management regime of protected natural areas categories), for the following reasons:
    • The remarkable landscape value offered by the isolation towards the middle of the steeply sloping eastern wall of the Miresei Rock, with a relative altitude of about 160 m above the Dâmbovița riverbed and about 100 m from the top of the limestone marker. The spectacular opening on the river-facing side of the 40 m-high, naturally sculpted portal of the cave, in an architectural style similar to Gothic, is a striking feature of the landscape, suggested by the ogival form (the entrance to the cave) framed by the arch (the portal is raised outwards). The interior landscape is characterized by the richness of the dripping and gravitational flowing forms, particularly in the last three rooms on the upstream side;
    • The existence of Upper Jurassic—Lower Cretaceous (Tithonian?) reef-forming fossiliferous deposits evidenced by torrential erosion and selective dissolution on an area of about 1 m2, on the right side of the “Coral Gallery”;
    • The ecological significance of the first rank, due to the functioning of the cavity as an isolated biotope, ideal for the conservation of one of the first two largest bat communities of the species Rhinolophus ferrumequinum (species of community and national interest), not only in the area of Piatra Craiului National Park but also in the territory of the entire area of the Bran—Dragoslavele Corridor and the Piatra Craiului Mountains. The other community with numerous individuals of this species is the Bear Cave in Cheia Mica in Dâmbovița.
The natural setting famous for the picturesque landscape, but especially the scientific, educational, didactic and cultural value of the geomorphological and geological sites in the area of the Podu Dâmboviței and Rucar depressions, led us to propose the geomorphological caving site Peștera Miresii (with zoospeological, paleontological, ecological, landscape and physical speleological relevance), the set of geotouristic resources of which it is part, which can be exploited along the thematic geotouristic circuit called “The Road of the gorges and caves of the upper Dâmbovița basin”, integrated into the geological and geomorphological nature reserve “The karst area of Cheile Dâmbovița—Dâmbovicioara—Brusturet”, included in the strict protection zone of the Piatra Craiului National Park.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Ș.B., D.P., P.C. and S.T.; methodology, S.T., D.P. and P.C.; software, F.I., R.S. and I.V.; validation, S.T., D.P. and P.C.; formal analysis, Ș.B. and S.T.; investigation, S.T.; resources, F.I., R.S. and I.V.; data curation, S.T., D.P. and P.C.; writing—original draft preparation, S.T., Ș.B. and D.P.; writing—review and editing, Ș.B. and S.T.; visualization, S.T.; supervision, D.P. and P.C.; project administration, Ș.B.; funding acquisition, Ș.B. and D.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present work has received financial support through the Development Fund of the Babes-Bolyai University.

Acknowledgments

The authors wished to thank Iulia I. Trăilă and Eugen Pepu and Iulian V. Milea for their support in the exploration, topography and mapping of the cave. We thank Radu Cheran, Dragoș Cioban, Alexandru Stana and Bugdan Țugui for the logistical support related to the exploration of the cave surroundings with the help of drones.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Dobrescu, I.; Everac, P. Resurse și ispite în Țara Muscelului; Semne Publishing House: Bucharest, Romania, 2003; 182p. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cocean, G. Trascău Mountains. Relief, Geomorphosituri, Turism; Presa Universitară Clujeană Publishing House: Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2011; 269p. [Google Scholar]
  3. Badea, L.; Niculescu, G.; Roată, S.; Buza, M.; Sandu, M. Unitățile de relief ale României, Carpații Meridionali și Munții Banatului; Ars Docendi Publishing House: Bucharest, Romania, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  4. Constantinescu, T.; Dobrescu, I. The Caves Catalogue of Piatra Craiului National Park Research in Piatra Craiului National Park, Vol. III; Editura Universității Transilvania: Brașov, Romania, 2006; pp. 10–30. [Google Scholar]
  5. Law No. 4/1972 on the Management of Forests Under the Direct Administration of Municipalities. Available online: https://lege5.ro/gratuit/gyydsobv/legea-nr-4-1972-privind-gospodarirea-padurilor-aflate-in-administrarea-directa-a-comunelor (accessed on 5 April 2022).
  6. Law No. 5/2000 on the Approval of the National Spatial Plan—Section III—Protected Areas. Available online: https://lege5.ro/Gratuit/gi3donbu/legea-nr-5-2000-privind-aprobarea-planului-de-amenajare-a-teritoriului-national-sectiunea-a-iii-a-zone-protejate (accessed on 5 April 2022).
  7. Order No. 1964 of 13 December 2007 on the Establishment of the Protected Natural Area Regime of Sites of Community Importance as Part of the Natura 2000 European Ecological Network in Romania. Available online: https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/89382 (accessed on 5 April 2022).
  8. Cocean, G.; Surdeanu, V.I. The Assessment of Geomorphosites of Touristic Interest in the Trascău Mountains. Stud. Univ. Babeș-Bolyai Geogr. 2011, 56, 67–81. [Google Scholar]
  9. Trif, S. Paleontological sites (marine invertebrates) and paleolithic archaeosites in the Transcarpathian corridor Bran—Rucar—Dragoslavele, landmarks of a geoturism with didactic and scientific purpose. In Proceedings of the National Conference Tourist Resources, Leisure and Sports Tourism, Factors of Community Progress, Bistrița, Romania, 7–9 December 2019. [Google Scholar]
  10. Popescu-Argeșel, I. Valea Dâmboviței; Sport-Turism Publishing House: Bucharest, Romania, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  11. Constantinescu, T. Piatra Craiului Massif. Geomorphologic Study; Editura Universitară: Bucharest, Romania, 2009; 164p. [Google Scholar]
  12. GEO No. 57 of 20 June 2007 on the Regime of Protected Natural Areas, Conservation of Natural Habitats, Wild Flora and Fauna. Available online: http://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/83289 (accessed on 10 April 2022).
  13. Law No. 49 of 7 April 2011 for the Approval of the Government Emergency Ordinance No. 57/2007 on the Regime of Protected Natural Areas, Conservation of Natural Habitats, Wild Flora and Fauna. Available online: https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocumentAfis/127715 (accessed on 10 April 2022).
  14. Summermatter, N. Quelques reflexions sur les techniques scripto-illustratives utilizeseses dans les brouchures relatives aux itineraires didactiques. In Geomorphologie et Tourisme; Reynard, E., Holzmann, C., Guex, D., Summermatter, N., Eds.; Travaux et recherches n. Solon Editorial House: Bistrita, Romania, 2003; Volume 24. [Google Scholar]
  15. Management Plan from 21 February 2020, of the National Park and the “Natura 2000” Site ROSCI0194 Piatra Craiului. Publ. 23 March 2020. Available online: http://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/225024 (accessed on 12 April 2022).
  16. România-natura70, Peștera Miresei, in Cheile Mari ale Dâmboviței, Culoarul Rucăr-Bran, Buletinul Comisia Centrale de Speologie, Number 4, Year 1980. Available online: https://sites.google.com/site/romanianatura70/home/carpatii-meridionali-ghiduri-harti-marcaje-pesteri/culoarul-rucar---bran/pestera-miresei-in-cheile-mari-ale-dambovitei-culoarul-rucar-bran (accessed on 6 May 2022).
  17. Patrulius, D. Geologia Masivului Bucegi și a Culoarului Dâmbovicioara; Editura Academiei R.S.R.: Bucharest, Romania, 1969; 321p. [Google Scholar]
  18. Patrulius, D.; Dimitrescu, R.; Gherasi, N.; Manilici, V.; Popescu, I. Geological Map of R. S. Romania, Scale: 1:50000, Map Sheet 110 c Rucar L-35-87-C; Romanian National Institute of Geology: Bucharest, Romania, 1971. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ielenicz, M. Observații geomorfologice în regiunea Rucăr și Podu Dâmboviței. Analele Univ. București Geogr. 1986, 35–89. [Google Scholar]
  20. Niculescu, G.; Roată, S. Bran-Dragoslavele corridor. Considerații geomorfologice. In Studii și Cercetări de Geografie, t. XLII; Romanian Academy’s Publishing House: București, Romania, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ministry of National Defense, Military Topographic Directorate, Bucharest, Topographic Maps 1:25000 (1974–1986), Accessed from the Secret Documents Office of the Faculty of Geography of “Babes-Bolyai” Cluj-Napoca University. Available online: https://www.annalsreview.geo.unibuc.ro/ (accessed on 3 February 2024).
  22. Hutchinson, M.F.; Xu, T.; Stein, J.A. Recent Progress in the ANUDEM Elevation Gridding Procedure. Geomorphometry 2011, 2011, 19–22. [Google Scholar]
  23. Cohen, K.M.; Finney, S.C.; Gibbard, P.L.; Fan, J.-X. The ICS International Chronostratigraphic Chart. Epis. J. Int. Geosci. 2013, 36, 199–204. Available online: https://stratigraphy.org/chart (accessed on 13 April 2022). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dragastan, O.N. The Carbonatic Getic Platform. Stratigraphy of the Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous, Paleogeographic Reconstructions, Provinces and Biodiversity; Editura Universității București: Bucharest, Romania, 2010; 621p. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bleahu, M. Morfologia Carstica; Editura Științifică: Bucharest, Romania, 1974; 590p. [Google Scholar]
  26. Cocean, P. Munții Apuseni. Processes and Karst Forms; Editura Academiei Române: Bucharest, Romania, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mac, I. Geomorphosphere and Geomorphosystems; Presa Universitară Clujeană Publishing House: Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bleahu, M.; Decu, V.; Negrea, Ș.; Pleșa, C.; Povară, I.; Viehmann, I. Peșteri din România; Editura Științifică și Enciclopedică: Bucharest, Romania, 1976; 415p. [Google Scholar]
  29. Orghidan, N. Bran (Morphological Considerations), BSRRG, LIV (1935). Buletinul Societăţii Regale Române de Geografie, 54, 1936. Available online: https://search.worldcat.org/title/1277263209 (accessed on 2 May 2024).
  30. Posea, G. Romania’s Geomorphology: Relief, Types, Genesis, Evolution, Regionalization, 2nd ed.; Romania of Tomorrow Foundation Publishing House: Bucharest, Romania, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mihăilescu, V. Carpații Sud-Estici de pe Teritoriul României; Editura Științifică: Bucharest, Romania, 1963. [Google Scholar]
  32. Cârciumaru, M. Mediul Geograficul în Pleistocenul Superiorul Pleistocenul și Culturile Paleolitice din România; Editura Academiei R. S. R. R.: București, Romania, 1980; 268p. [Google Scholar]
  33. Cârciumaru, M. Human Evolution in Quaternary; Lumina Lex Publishing House: Bucharest, Romania, 1999; 215p. [Google Scholar]
  34. Szepesi, A. Masivul Iezer—Elemente de Geografie Fizică; Editura Universitară: București, Romania, 2007; 208p. [Google Scholar]
  35. Law No. 90 of 10 May 2000 for the Accession of Romania to the”Agreement on the Conservation of Bats in Europe”, Adopted in London on 4 December 1991. Available online: http://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocumentAfis/22458 (accessed on 22 April 2022).
  36. Pop, O.G.; Murariu, D.; Ionescu, D.T.; Indreica, A.V.; Gurean, D.M.; Vezeanu, C.; Manu, M.; Bordea, I. Parcul Național Piatra Craiului—Ghidul Specieilor și Habitatelor de Interesse Comunitar și National; Editura Ars Docendi, Universitatea din București: Bucharest, Romania, 2015; 288p. [Google Scholar]
  37. Management Plan of the National Park and the “Natura 2000” Site ROSCI0194 Piatra Craiului, Publ. 1 March 2020. Annex No. 19—Distribution Maps for Species of Conservation Interest, Annex No. 20—Distribution Maps for Habitats of Conservation Interest. Available online: https://www.pcrai.ro/files/pdf/Plan%20Management.pdf (accessed on 14 April 2022).
  38. Lakatos, J.; Magyari-Sáska, Z.; Dombay, S. A GIS-based Analysis for Ecotourism Suitability in a Geological Complex Area of Carpathians. Geogr. Tech. 2023, 18, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of the Miresii Cave geomorphosite in Cheia Mare of Dâmbovița, Bran—Dragoslavele Corridor, Romania (a); access by climbing trails to the Miresii Cave and Miresii Ice Cave on the eastern face of Miresii Rock (b) (source: field exploration, September 2020, October 2021).
Figure 1. Location of the Miresii Cave geomorphosite in Cheia Mare of Dâmbovița, Bran—Dragoslavele Corridor, Romania (a); access by climbing trails to the Miresii Cave and Miresii Ice Cave on the eastern face of Miresii Rock (b) (source: field exploration, September 2020, October 2021).
Heritage 07 00274 g001
Figure 2. Miresii Cave (no. 6), a speleological geomorphosite in the Podu Dâmboviței—Rucar geographical area, part of the thematic geotouristic circuit “The Road of the gorges and caves of Upper Dâmbovițean Basin” integrated into protected natural areas at national and EU level.
Figure 2. Miresii Cave (no. 6), a speleological geomorphosite in the Podu Dâmboviței—Rucar geographical area, part of the thematic geotouristic circuit “The Road of the gorges and caves of Upper Dâmbovițean Basin” integrated into protected natural areas at national and EU level.
Heritage 07 00274 g002
Figure 3. Apparatus and instruments used in the field research stages: drone DJI Mavic Air 2 (a), laser rangefinder Leica Disto X310 (b), laser rangefinder Bosh DLE 70 Professional, 30 m wheel and GPS Garmin eTrex Legend C (c); measurements from the Iatacul Miresii Cave processed with TopoDroid; (d) and measurements from the Miresii Cave processed with CorelDRAW Graphics Suite X3 (e).
Figure 3. Apparatus and instruments used in the field research stages: drone DJI Mavic Air 2 (a), laser rangefinder Leica Disto X310 (b), laser rangefinder Bosh DLE 70 Professional, 30 m wheel and GPS Garmin eTrex Legend C (c); measurements from the Iatacul Miresii Cave processed with TopoDroid; (d) and measurements from the Miresii Cave processed with CorelDRAW Graphics Suite X3 (e).
Heritage 07 00274 g003
Figure 4. Kimmeridgian or Tithonian reef limestones highlighted in the ‘’Coral Gallery’’ (source: field exploration and research data analysis, 2021).
Figure 4. Kimmeridgian or Tithonian reef limestones highlighted in the ‘’Coral Gallery’’ (source: field exploration and research data analysis, 2021).
Heritage 07 00274 g004
Figure 5. Lithology and morphotectonics of the Podu Dâmboviței—Rucar geographical area. (The source of the processed geological map: [18]).
Figure 5. Lithology and morphotectonics of the Podu Dâmboviței—Rucar geographical area. (The source of the processed geological map: [18]).
Heritage 07 00274 g005
Figure 6. Miresii Cave formed by torrential erosion and karst processes along a tectonic tension diaclase (a); the basin at the mouth of the deep limestone torrent north of Miresei Cliff, with possible water access to the cave (b); highlight of the cave portal on the east face of the cliff (c) (source: field exploration and research data analysis, 2020).
Figure 6. Miresii Cave formed by torrential erosion and karst processes along a tectonic tension diaclase (a); the basin at the mouth of the deep limestone torrent north of Miresei Cliff, with possible water access to the cave (b); highlight of the cave portal on the east face of the cliff (c) (source: field exploration and research data analysis, 2020).
Heritage 07 00274 g006
Figure 7. Iatacul Miresii cave, unpublished—longitudinal profile (a), transverse profile (b) (source: field exploration on 29 October 2021 and research data analysis; photo, Trăilă Iulia I).
Figure 7. Iatacul Miresii cave, unpublished—longitudinal profile (a), transverse profile (b) (source: field exploration on 29 October 2021 and research data analysis; photo, Trăilă Iulia I).
Heritage 07 00274 g007
Figure 8. Unpublished speleological geomorphosite Peștera Miresii, morphometric and morphographic characteristics (source: field exploration on 31 October 2021 and research data analysis).
Figure 8. Unpublished speleological geomorphosite Peștera Miresii, morphometric and morphographic characteristics (source: field exploration on 31 October 2021 and research data analysis).
Heritage 07 00274 g008
Figure 9. High-density speleothems towards the upstream end of the cave, in the “Throne Room”: conical stalactites and stalagmites (a), “Great Column” and stalagmitic plateau (b) (source: field exploration and research data analysis, 2021).
Figure 9. High-density speleothems towards the upstream end of the cave, in the “Throne Room”: conical stalactites and stalagmites (a), “Great Column” and stalagmitic plateau (b) (source: field exploration and research data analysis, 2021).
Heritage 07 00274 g009
Figure 10. Forms of gravitational prehension in the “Altar of the Bride” room, on the ceiling—prehension stalactites (a) and on the walls, or over the poles—“Altar Organ” (b) (source: field exploration and research data analysis, 2021).
Figure 10. Forms of gravitational prehension in the “Altar of the Bride” room, on the ceiling—prehension stalactites (a) and on the walls, or over the poles—“Altar Organ” (b) (source: field exploration and research data analysis, 2021).
Heritage 07 00274 g010
Figure 11. “Throne Hall,” 8 November 2015, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum, an overwintering colony of about 100 individuals (a) and 31 October 2021, 5 rhinolophid individuals (b); guano deposit with the mycelium of a guanophilous species in the “Throne Room Vestibule” cavity (c). Source: Field exploration and research data analysis, 2015 and 2021.
Figure 11. “Throne Hall,” 8 November 2015, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum, an overwintering colony of about 100 individuals (a) and 31 October 2021, 5 rhinolophid individuals (b); guano deposit with the mycelium of a guanophilous species in the “Throne Room Vestibule” cavity (c). Source: Field exploration and research data analysis, 2015 and 2021.
Heritage 07 00274 g011
Figure 12. The walls joined in pointed arches (a), the ogival shape and height of the cave portal (b), and the morphography of the transverse profile of the ‘Crosnia with Tentacles’ hall (c) are evidence of morphogenesis through torrential erosion and karstification along a tectonic stress diaclase corresponding to Miresii Cave. Source: Field exploration and research data analysis, 2021.
Figure 12. The walls joined in pointed arches (a), the ogival shape and height of the cave portal (b), and the morphography of the transverse profile of the ‘Crosnia with Tentacles’ hall (c) are evidence of morphogenesis through torrential erosion and karstification along a tectonic stress diaclase corresponding to Miresii Cave. Source: Field exploration and research data analysis, 2021.
Heritage 07 00274 g012
Figure 13. Leveling surfaces in the geographical area Podu Dâmboviței—Rucar (the cross-sectional profile of the valley at Peștera Miresii is shown in Figure 11). Sources of processed maps: [17,19,20] and research data analysis, 2021.
Figure 13. Leveling surfaces in the geographical area Podu Dâmboviței—Rucar (the cross-sectional profile of the valley at Peștera Miresii is shown in Figure 11). Sources of processed maps: [17,19,20] and research data analysis, 2021.
Heritage 07 00274 g013
Figure 14. The absolute altitudinal position of the Miresii Cave on the right slope of the Cheii Mari a Dâmbovița is ±890 m, which can be connected with that of the Braniște Level [20]. Source: DEM and research data analysis, 2021.
Figure 14. The absolute altitudinal position of the Miresii Cave on the right slope of the Cheii Mari a Dâmbovița is ±890 m, which can be connected with that of the Braniște Level [20]. Source: DEM and research data analysis, 2021.
Heritage 07 00274 g014
Table 1. Key type valley sections in the geographical area Podu Dâmboviței—Rucar integrated of the thematic geotouristic circuit “The Road of gorges and caves in the upper basin of the Dâmbovița”.
Table 1. Key type valley sections in the geographical area Podu Dâmboviței—Rucar integrated of the thematic geotouristic circuit “The Road of gorges and caves in the upper basin of the Dâmbovița”.
Nr.
Crt.
KEY NAME and Protected Natural Area Status:
SPA—Strict Protection Zone of Piatra Craiului National Park;
RNGG1—Geological and Geomorphological Nature Reserve “Karst Area Cheile Dâmbovița—Dâmbovicioara—Brusturet”, included in SPA;
ROSCI 0194/ROSPA 0165—Natura 2000 Site
Massivul (Mas.)
or Mountains (Mt.)
(Framing or Delimiting)
The River
(Valley)
Lengh
(m)
1The Great Key of Dâmbovița
or Cheia de Jos
(RNGG1 included in SPA)
Mt. Posada to the west, Mt. Ghimbav to the east, Mt. Vârtoapele to the southDâmbovița4050
2Small Key of the Dâmbovița or Upper Key (or Plaiului Mare Key)
(RNGG1 included in SPA)
southwest of Piatra Craiului MassifDâmbovița1660
3Tambovicioarei Key
or the Lower Dambovicioara Key
(RNGG1 included in SPA)
Southeast of Mas. Piatra CraiuluiDâmbovicioara1820
4“Key of the City” (limestone torrent)
(ROSCI 0194/ROSPA 0165)
On the steep cliff in the N depression. tectonic. Podu Dâmboviței (Corridor Bran—Dragoslave)Times180 m (in plan)/
80 m (level difference)
Horn of Orății
(ROSCI0194/ROSPA 0165)
Torrential tributary of the Orăți river115 m (in plan)/
70 m (level difference)
5Key to the Key
(RNGG1 included in SPA)
Northwest of Ghimbav MountainKey650
6The middle or in the Walls Key
(ROSCI0194/ROSPA 0165)
In the north–northwest of Mount GhimbavKey333
7The key to Ghimbav
(RNGG1 included in SPA)
Mt. Ghimbav to the northeast, Mt. Vârtoapele to the southwest (Mt. Leaota)Ghimbav Valley3000
Source: Field exploration and research data analysis [10].
Table 2. Caves in the geographical area Podu Dâmboviței—Rucar integrated of the thematic geotouristic circuit “The Road of gorges and caves in the Upper Dâmbovițean basin”.
Table 2. Caves in the geographical area Podu Dâmboviței—Rucar integrated of the thematic geotouristic circuit “The Road of gorges and caves in the Upper Dâmbovițean basin”.
Nr.
Crt.
Cave NAME and Protected Natural Area Status:
SPA—Strict Protection Zone of Piatra Craiului National Park;
ROSCI 0194—Natura 2000 Site;
MN—Monument of Nature;
RN—Nature Reserve
WatershedAltitude
Relative (m)
Length or
Dezvol-Tarea
(m)
Denive-Larea
(m)
1P. Lupului
(RN status, included in SPA)
Dâmbovița Valley (Cheia Mică)20147+8.5
2P. Bursucului or P. Decolmatată
(RN status, included in SPA)
Dâmbovița Valley (Cheia Mică)2587+1
3P. Urșilor or P. de la Colțul Surpat or Peștera nr. 15
(MN included in SPA)
Dâmbovița Valley (Cheia Mică)20540+10
4P. Pleașa
(proposed as RN. No nature protection area included)
Pleșei (Preotului) valley, Râușor basin110126.3+27
5P. Posada or Posăzii Hole
(ROSCI 0194)
Roghina Valley4212.6−20.95; +2.5
6P. of Our Lady or P. of the Virgin
(proposed as MN, included in SPA)
Dâmbovița Valley (Cheia Mare)158137+11
7Avenul Bârnoaia
or the Barnacle Hole
(ROSCI 0194)
Roghina Valley, Dâmbovița basin165 m from V. Roghina;
150 m from V. Dâmboviței
69 m (well) +13 m (chimney)−69
Source: Field exploration and research data analysis [4,11].
Table 3. Chronological stages of karst karstification and morphological individualization of Miresii Cave in local and regional geocronomorphologic context (summary). Data sources for approximate ages: [11,33,34].
Table 3. Chronological stages of karst karstification and morphological individualization of Miresii Cave in local and regional geocronomorphologic context (summary). Data sources for approximate ages: [11,33,34].
Individualization
Morphological
Relief StepsApproximative AgeThe Movement
Orogenetic
-Carpathian Leveling SurfacesCumulative Relief StepsGeochronologic Timescale Age
(years)
-
-
Perfecting the surface;
The area is well represented in the bridges above the Dâmbovița and Dâmbovicioarei gorges
-
Surface fragmentation
is due to the deepening of the Dâmbovița and its tributaries
  • Initiation and evolution of the Miresii Cave tectonic stress diaclase
GORNO-VITA II
(Moieciu level)
980–1080 m
PLIOCEN superior (Villafranchian)
PLEISTOCEN (PL.) lower
Înc. 2,500,000
Sf. 300,000
Block uplift tectonic movements,
The valah fafa
from pleistocen inf.
-
Level improvement; It is evident in the area of the Podu Dâmboviței–Rucar and along the Carpathian valley of the Dâmbovița River, south of Rucar
Braniște level
(Carpathian valley level)
800–850–900 m
PL.
m
e
d
i
u
Riss IÎnc. 300,000
Sf. 1,300,000
Neotectonic movements
Passage Phase
Riss II
-
Level fragmentation
  • Ceiling marmites (P. Miresii, ±895 m alt. abs.), evidence of the karst karstification phenomenon in phreatic regime (Stage I)
Intergla-ciary
Riss—Würm
Înc. 130,000
Sf. 80,000
  • The phenomenon of karstification of P. Miresii evolves in a vados regime. The cave develops on the path of the tectonic tensional diaclase up to the present level of the floor at the entrance/exit, 880 m alt. abs. (Stage II). The current local water table is located at 722.5 m alt. abs., imposed by the local base level of the Dâmbovița River.
PL.
s
u
p
e
r
i
o
r

Qp3
Würm IÎnc. 80,000
St. 10,200
Recent and current neotectonic movements
Würm II
River terrace of ±25 m,
±755 m alt. abs,
Podu Dâmboviței
are age Qp3 [17]
Würm III
  • Continuous karstification phenomenon in P. Miresii by drip and seepage processes of the CaCO3-rich solution (precipitation)
-
The lower level of lateral marls in the sector of maximum narrowing of the Cheii Mari of the Dâmbovița is correlated with the proluvial deposits (Qh) of the terasate cone of the Rucar depression
River terrace
5–8 m,
Podu Dâmboviței
Two-step terraced con
The present-day Dâmbovița Albia
HOLOCEN
(Qh)
Înc. 10,200
Current,
0 years
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bilașco, Ș.; Trif, S.; Petrea, D.; Cocean, P.; Ioan, F.; Sanda, R.; Vescan, I. Contributions to the Morphogenesis, Inventory, and Valorization of a Unique Speleological Geomorphosite from Miresii Cave—The Large Key of Dâmbovița, the Corridor Bran—Dragoslave (Romania). Heritage 2024, 7, 5814-5838. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7100274

AMA Style

Bilașco Ș, Trif S, Petrea D, Cocean P, Ioan F, Sanda R, Vescan I. Contributions to the Morphogenesis, Inventory, and Valorization of a Unique Speleological Geomorphosite from Miresii Cave—The Large Key of Dâmbovița, the Corridor Bran—Dragoslave (Romania). Heritage. 2024; 7(10):5814-5838. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7100274

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bilașco, Ștefan, Septimius Trif, Dănuț Petrea, Pompei Cocean, Fodorean Ioan, Roșca Sanda, and Iuliu Vescan. 2024. "Contributions to the Morphogenesis, Inventory, and Valorization of a Unique Speleological Geomorphosite from Miresii Cave—The Large Key of Dâmbovița, the Corridor Bran—Dragoslave (Romania)" Heritage 7, no. 10: 5814-5838. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7100274

APA Style

Bilașco, Ș., Trif, S., Petrea, D., Cocean, P., Ioan, F., Sanda, R., & Vescan, I. (2024). Contributions to the Morphogenesis, Inventory, and Valorization of a Unique Speleological Geomorphosite from Miresii Cave—The Large Key of Dâmbovița, the Corridor Bran—Dragoslave (Romania). Heritage, 7(10), 5814-5838. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7100274

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop