Technical Non-Invasive Study of an 18th Century Novo-Hispanic Panel Painting
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Description of the Painting
1.2. Analytical Techniques
1.2.1. Visible (VIS) and Ultraviolet (UV) Imaging
1.2.2. Hyperspectral Imaging (HSI)
1.2.3. Fiber Optic Reflectance Spectroscopy (FORS)
1.2.4. X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy (XRF)
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Purísima Concepción: Materials and Painting Technique
2.1.1. Binding Media
2.1.2. Color Palette
2.2. The Virgin Mary: Changes of View and Composition by Imaging Techniques
3. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Appendix B
Region | XRF ID | Elements | FORS ID |
---|---|---|---|
Virgin Mary | |||
Trimming | 49 | Pb, Cu, Au, Hg, Ca, Fe | 36 |
Collar | 43 | Pb, Au, Cu, Ca, Hg, Fe | 29 |
Christogram | 38 | ||
Star Mantle | 56 | Pb, Cu, Au, Fe, Co, K | |
Imperial Crown Arche | 28 | Pb, Cu, Fe, Hg, Zn, Ca, Au | |
Imperial crown Circlet | 30 | Pb, Au, Cu, Fe, Ca, Hg, Sn | |
Stellarium | 32 | Pb, Fe, Au, Ca, Cu, Hg | |
Radiance | |||
Radiance | 1 | Pb, Fe, Zn, Ca, Hg, Cu | |
Radiance | 13 | Pb, Fe, Ca, Cu, Hg, As | |
Radiance | 37 | Pb, Ca, Fe, As, Hg, Cu | |
Glory Break | |||
Glory Break | 2 | Pb, Ca, Fe, Hg, As, Cu, Sn | 5 |
Glory Break | 3 | Pb, Fe, Ca, As, Cu, Hg | |
Glory Break | 7 | Pb, Zn, Fe, Ca, Hg, As | |
Glory Break | 9 | Pb, Fe, Ca, As, Hg, Cu | |
Glory Break | 10 | Pb, Fe, Ca, Cu, As, Hg | 32 |
Glory Break | 12 | Pb, Fe, Ca, As, Cu, Hg | 31 |
Glory Break | 36 | Pb, Fe, Ca, As, Hg, Cu, | |
Holy Spirit | |||
Nimbus Holy Spirit | 22 | Pb, Au, Cu, Fe, Co, Hg, Ca | 2 |
Simulated Frame | |||
Simulated Frame | 14 | Pb, Cu, Fe, Au, Ca, Hg | 1 |
Simulated Frame | 23 | Pb, Au, Cu, Fe, Hg, Ca, Sn | |
Simulated Frame | 67 | Pb, Fe, Au, Cu, Ca, Hg |
Region | XRF ID | Elements | FORS ID |
---|---|---|---|
Virgin Mary | |||
Mantle | 45 | Pb, As, Cu, Fe, Ca, Co, K | |
Mantle | 46 | Pb, Ca, As, Fe, Cu, Co | 33, 34 |
Mantle | 47 | Pb, Cu, Fe, Ca, Cu, K, Co | |
Mantle | 52 | Pb, Ca, As, Fe, Co, Cu | 39 |
Mantle | 54 | Pb, Cu, As, Fe, Co, Ca, K | |
Mantle | 55 | Pb, Cu, As, Ca, Fe, Co | |
Mantle | 57 | Ca, Zn, Cr, Sr, Ti, Co, Fe, Pb | |
Angel | |||
Mantle | 34 | Pb, As, Ca, Cu, Fe, Hg | 20, 22 |
Mantle | 35 | Pb, As, Ca, Fe, Cu, Hg | 25 |
Holy Spirit celestial background | |||
20 | Pb, Ca, Zn, As, Fe, Ti, Co | 4 | |
24 | Pb, Ca, As, Fe, Co |
Region | XRF ID | Elements | FORS ID |
---|---|---|---|
Virgin Mary | |||
Lips | 42 | Pb, Hg, Ca, Fe, Cu | 28 |
Sleeve | 51 | Hg, Pb, Fe, Ca, Cu | 37 |
Mantle | 58 | Pb, Hg, Ca, Fe, Cu | 54 |
Crown | 26 | Pb, Hg, Ca, Fe, Cu | 10 |
Crown | 53 | Pb, Hg, Cu, Fe, Ca |
Region | XRF ID | Elements | FORS ID |
---|---|---|---|
Virgin Mary | |||
Virgin’s Hair | 38 | Pb, Fe, Ca, Cu, As, Hg | 27 |
Left Angel | |||
Hair | 16 | Pb, Fe, Ca, Hg, As, Cu, Au, Sn | |
left Angel | |||
Hair | 16 | ||
Eye | 33 | Pb, Fe, Hg, Ca, Cu, K, Au Sn |
Region | XRF ID | Elements | FORS ID |
---|---|---|---|
Virgin Mary | |||
Emerald | 27 | Pb, Cu, Au, Fe, Ca, Hg, Zn | 14 |
Emerald | 29 | Pb, Cu, Ca, Fe, Hg, Zn | 13 |
palm | |||
86 | Pb, As, Ca, Fe, Hg, Cu | 58 | |
Lily | |||
Lily | 81 | Pb, As, Cu, Fe, Hg, Ca | 57 |
Region | XRF ID | Elements | FORS ID |
---|---|---|---|
Virgin Mary | |||
Head | 40 | Pb, Ca, Hg, Fe, Cu | |
Cheek | 41 | Pb, Ca, Hg, Cu, Fe | |
Angel | |||
Foot | 11 | Pb, Ca, Hg, Fe, Cu | |
Cheek | 17 | Pb, Ca, Hg, Fe, Cu | 6 |
Hand | 31 | Pb, Ca, Hg, Fe, Cu | 17, 21 |
Querubin | |||
Head | 68 | Pb, Ca, Hg, Fe, Cu | |
Cheek | 70 | Pb, Hg, Ca, Cu, Fe |
References
- Cano, N.; de Lucio, O. Purísima Concepción. Tiempo y Forma de Una Pintura Novohispana; Anales del Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas: Mexico City, Mexico, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Rowlands, A.; Sarris, A. Detection of exposed and subsurface archaeological remains using multi-sensor remote sensing. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2007, 34, 795–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavalli, R.M.; Colosi, F.; Palombo, A.; Pignatti, S.; Poscolieri, M. Remote hyperspectral imagery as a support to archaeological prospection. J. Cult. Herit. 2007, 8, 272–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bassani, C.; Cavalli, R.M.; Goffredo, R.; Palombo, A.; Pascucci, S.; Pignatti, S. Specific spectral bands for different land cover contexts to improve the efficiency of remote sensing archaeological prospection: The Arpi case study. J. Cult. Herit. 2009, 10, e41–e48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fiumi, L. Surveying the roofs of Rome. J. Cult. Herit. 2012, 13, 304–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hällström, J.; Barup, K.; Grönlund, R.; Johansson, A.; Svanberg, S.; Palombi, L.; Lognoli, D.; Raimondi, V.; Cecchi, G.; Conti, C. Documentation of soiled and biodeteriorated facades: A case study on the Coliseum, Rome, using hyperspectral imaging fluorescence lidars. J. Cult. Herit. 2009, 10, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez, M.; Arroyo-Lemus, E.; Ruvalcaba-Sil, J.; Mitrani, A.; Maynez-Rojas, M.; de Lucio, O. Technical non-invasive study of the novo-hispanic painting the Pentecost by Baltasar de Echave Orio by spectroscopic techniques and hyperspectral imaging: In quest for the painter’s hand. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2021, 250, 119225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Padoan, R.; Klein, M.E.; Groves, R.M.; de Bruin, G.; Steemers, T.A.G.; Strlič, M. Quantitative assessment of impact and sensitivity of imaging spectroscopy for monitoring of ageing of archival documents. J. Cult. Herit. 2021, 4, 105–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, M.; Zhang, N.; Wang, Z.; Ren, J.; Chai, B.; Sun, J. What’s wrong with the murals at the Mogao Grottoes: A near-infrared hyperspectral imaging method. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hou, M.; Zhou, P.; Lv, S.; Hu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Wu, W.; He, H.; Li, S.; Tan, L. Virtual restoration of stains on ancient paintings with maximum noise fraction transformation based on the hyperspectral imaging. J. Cult. Herit. 2018, 34, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verougstraete, H. Frames and Supports in 15th and 16th Century—Southern Netherlandish Painting; Royal Institute for Cultural Heritage: Brussels, Belgium, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Moreno, P.S. Fernando Gallego and the altarpiece of Ciudad Rodrigo. In Fernando Gallego and His Workshop: The Altarpiece from Ciudad Rodrigo; Dotseth, A.W., Anderson, B.C., Roglán, M.A., Eds.; Philip Wilson Publishers: London, UK, 2008; p. 41. [Google Scholar]
- Carrillo, A. Técnica de La Pintura de Nueva España; Instituto de Investigaciones Esteticas: Ciudad de México, Mexico, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Veganzones, M.A.; Graña, M. Endmember extraction methods: A short review. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2008, 400–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karbhari, V.K.; Mahesh, M.S.; Dhananjay, B.N. Hyperspectral endmember extraction techniques. In Processing and Analysis of Hyperspectral Data; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020; p. 13. [Google Scholar]
- Foglini, F.; Grande, V.; Marchese, F.; Bracchi, V.A.; Prampolini, M.; Angeletti, L.; Castellan, G.; Chimienti, G.; Hansen, I.M.; Gudmundsen, M.; et al. Application of hyperspectral imaging to underwater habitat mapping, Southern Adriatic Sea. Sensors 2019, 19, 2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sil, J.L.R.; Miranda, D.R.; Melo, V.A.; Picazo, F. SANDRA: A portable XRF system for the study of Mexican cultural heritage. X-Ray Spectrom. 2010, 39, 338–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dooley, K.A.; Lomax, S.; Zeibel, J.G.; Miliani, C.; Ricciardi, P.; Hoenigswald, A.; Loew, M.; Delaney, J.K. Mapping of egg yolk and animal skin glue paint binders in Early Renaissance paintings using near infrared reflectance imaging spectroscopy. Analyst 2013, 138, 4838–4848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vargaslugo, E.; Ángeles, J.P.; Gutiérrez, A.C.; Correa, J. Su Vida y Su Obra; Instituto de Investigaciones Esteticas: Ciudad de México, Mexico, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Rodríguez Nóbrega, J. Pintura en los reinos: Identidades compartidas. Territorios del mundo hispánico, siglos XVI-XVIII. In El Oro en la Pintura de los Reinos de la Monarquía Española—Técnica y Simbolismo; Haces, J.G., Ed.; Fomento Cultural Banamex: Mexico City, Mexico, 2009; pp. 1314–1375. [Google Scholar]
- Aceto, M.; Agostino, A.; Fenoglio, G.; Idone, A.; Gulmini, M.; Picollo, M.; Ricciardi, P.; Delaney, J.K. Characterisation of colourants on illuminated manuscripts by portable fibre optic UV-visible-NIR reflectance spectrophotometry. Anal. Methods 2014, 6, 1488–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arroyo, E.; Espinosa, M.E.; Falcón, T.; Hernández, E. Variaciones celestes para pintar el manto de la Virgen. An. Inst. Investig. Estéticas 2012, 34, 85–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Picollo, M.; Bacci, M.; Magrini, D.; Radicati, B.; Trumpy, G.; Tsukada, M.; Kunzelman, D. Modern white pigments: Their identification by means of noninvasive ultraviolet, visible, and infrared fiber optic reflectance spectroscopy. In Modern Paints Uncovered, Proceedings of the Modern Paints Uncovered Symposium, London, UK, 16–19 May 2006; Getty Conservation Institute: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2007; pp. 118–128. [Google Scholar]
Palette | Region | Compounds Identified/Inferred | FORS (nm) | XRF |
---|---|---|---|---|
Golden | Virgin Mary: Trimming Collar Christogram Star Mantle Imperial crown arche Imperial crown circlet Holy Spirit: Nimbus Simulated frame Stellarium Radiance | Gold Alloy: Au and Cu Ochre (FeO) + Orpiment (AsS) | 538 b 536 b 558 b – – – 535 b 546 b – – | Pb, Cu, Au, Hg Pb, Au, Cu, Ca – Pb, Cu, Au, Fe Pb, Cu, Fe, Hg Pb, Au, Cu, Fe Pb, Au, Cu, Fe Pb, Cu, Fe, Au Pb, Fe, Au, Ca Pb, Fe, Ca, As |
Blues | Virgin Mary Mantle Angel Mantle Holy Spirit Celestial Background | Azurite (CuCaCO) Azurite (CuCaCO) Indigo | 465 c, 646 a, 1000 b, 1496 a, 2289 a, 2352 a, 483 c, 645 a, 1003 b, 1496 a, 2289 a, 2352 a 784 b | Pb, Ca, Cu, As Pb, As, Ca, Cu Pb, Ca, As |
Reds | Virgin Mary: Lips Sleeve Corona | Vermillion (HgS) | 594 b 596 b 594 b | Pb, Hg, Ca, Fe Hg, Pb, Fe, Ca Pb, Hg, Cu, Fe |
Brownish | Virgin Mary: Hair Crown Angel: Hair Eye | Iron Oxide, Orpiment (AsS) Iron Oxide, Pb-Sn Yellow Iron Oxide Iron Oxide, Pb-Sn Yellow | 578 b, 718 b, 831 a – 567 b, 720 b, 832 a – | Pb, Fe, Ca, Cu, As Pb, Cu, Fe, Ca, Hg, Sn – Pb, Fe, Hg, Ca |
Greens | Virgin Mary Emerald Palm Lily | Copper Resinate | 584 c, 712 a 704 a 708 a | Pb, Cu, Au, Fe Pb, As, Ca, Fe Pb, As, Cu, Fe |
Flesh tones | Virgin Mary Angel Cherub | Vermillion (HgS) + Lead White + Azurite | – 585 b, 1204 a, 1447 a – | Pb, Ca, Hg, Fe Pb, Ca, Hg, Fe Pb, Ca, Hg, Fe |
Region | Image | Results |
---|---|---|
Virgin Mary, Face (Figure 13) | (a), (d) | When comparing the mosaics (a) and (d), we notice the restoration by vertical lines on the face and the white tunic. |
(h) | Mosaic (h) highlights the volume of the layers of color in the golden areas. | |
(a), (e) | When comparing (a) and (e), the pseudo color image shows that the reddish tones of the eyelids, cheeks, and tunic present a similar tonality, which indicates a vermilion distribution. This pigment was identified by XRF and FORS. | |
(a), (e) | Image (e) allows us to appreciate the distribution of the gilding applied in the jewels, trimmings, and Stellarium. | |
(a), (i) | By comparing (a) and (i), we can observe the restoration areas on the face corresponding with white tones. It also highlights the texture of the Stellarium fillings, the pearl necklace, and trimmings for the tunic. | |
Virgin Mary, Hands (Figure 14) | (a), (b), (e) | Images (a), (b), and (e) make it possible to compare the distribution of the material applied in the gilding of the trimmings, the Christogram, and the stars of the mantle. From XRF, the presence of Au and Cu indicate a gold alloy, such as in the quadrant of Mary’s face, whereas the stars of the mantle were made by a pigment with a high content of Pb and Sn. |
(a), (d) | Comparing (a) and (d), we can observe restoration areas. | |
(a), (i) | Between (a) and (i), we could see the profile of a version of the Virgin Mary, an underlying composition painted in a previous century. | |
Imperial Crown (Figure 15) | (a), (b) | Images (a) and (b) exhibit different contributions of the materials used in the golden, reddish, bluish, and green tones. First, the application of gilding in the lower area of the crown and Stellarium present a similar composition of Au and Cu, whereas the upper area presents an opaque tonality due to the use of an earth shade. The reddish bonnet of the crown, in addition to the incarnation of the angels’ hands, and the representation of rubies, present the same yellow hue based on vermilion. Blush is distinguished by a reddish hue for the celestial background of the Holy Spirit, compared to FORS spectroscopic techniques, and this material indicates the presence, in greater contribution, of a lacquer pigment, such as indigo. As for the green, the jewels that represent the emeralds indicate the same bluish material, whereas the XRF spectroscopy indicates the presence of Cu, and, in complement with FORS, they help us to confirm the presence of a copper resinate. |
(a), (d), (i) | The comparison of Images (a), (d), and (i) allows us to distinguish the restoration of the background of the painting by means of the Rigatino, which is vertical and fine brushstrokes applied in the regions with material losses. | |
right-Side Angel (Figure 16) | (a), (b), (d) | In Figures (a) and (b), the distribution of materials with the same behavior are shown: the reddish tone of vermilion was used in the blush of the cheeks, lips, and wings of the angels, whereas in the blue tone of the cloth, there is azurite. |
(a), (d) | The restoration of the background by Rigatino is noticeable when comparing Figures (a) and (d). |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pérez, M.; Cano, N.; Ruvalcaba-Sil, J.L.; Mitrani, A.; de Lucio, O.G. Technical Non-Invasive Study of an 18th Century Novo-Hispanic Panel Painting. Heritage 2021, 4, 3676-3696. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4040202
Pérez M, Cano N, Ruvalcaba-Sil JL, Mitrani A, de Lucio OG. Technical Non-Invasive Study of an 18th Century Novo-Hispanic Panel Painting. Heritage. 2021; 4(4):3676-3696. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4040202
Chicago/Turabian StylePérez, Miguel, Nathael Cano, José Luis Ruvalcaba-Sil, Alejandro Mitrani, and Oscar G. de Lucio. 2021. "Technical Non-Invasive Study of an 18th Century Novo-Hispanic Panel Painting" Heritage 4, no. 4: 3676-3696. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4040202