Role of High-Resolution Land Surface Representation in WRF Model for Forecasting Extreme Heatwave Conditions over Cyprus
Highlights
- Updating the WRF model with the high-resolution ESA WorldCover 2021 LULC dataset significantly improved predictions for 2 m temperature, relative humidity, and 10 m wind speed across 85% of the evaluated sites during the July 2023 Cyprus heatwave.
- The modernized spatial boundaries effectively restored the urban “thermal memory”, allowing the model to successfully capture the deep daytime Urban Cool Island (UCI) effect, nocturnal heat release, and correct systematic underestimations of the nocturnal Planetary Boundary Layer Height (PBLH).
- Integrating highly accurate, static land cover maps intrinsically recalibrates surface energy partitioning, which can partially mitigate the immediate operational need for computationally expensive urban modeling during extreme thermal events.
- Static boundary updates alone are insufficient to resolve the model’s damped thermal inertia or deep-rooted kinetic errors, highlighting the need for future simulations to incorporate dynamic “Green Resilience” parameters such as increased urban vegetation coupled with soil moisture in urban model.
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Model Framework
2.2. Land Use and Land Cover Data
2.3. Observational Sites and Data
3. Results
3.1. Spatial Distribution Analysis and Statistical Evaluation
3.2. Diurnal Urban Heat Island (UHI) Hysteresis Dynamics
3.3. High-Frequency Heating and Cooling Rates
3.4. Kinematic Verification and Atmospheric Stagnation
3.5. Planetary Boundary Layer Height (PBLH) Validation
4. Summary and Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lelieveld, J.; Proestos, Y.; Hadjinicolaou, P.; Tanarhte, M.; Tyrlis, E.; Zittis, G. Strongly increasing heat extremes in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) in the 21st century. Clim. Change 2016, 137, 245–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zittis, G.; Almazroui, M.; Alpert, P.; Ciais, P.; Cramer, W.; Dahdal, Y.; Fnais, M.; Francis, D.; Hadjinicolaou, P.; Jamous, F.; et al. Climate Change and Weather Extremes in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. Rev. Geophys. 2022, 60, e2021RG000762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lazoglou, G.; Hadjinicolaou, P.; Sofokleous, I.; Bruggeman, A.; Zittis, G. Climate change and extremes in the Mediterranean island of Cyprus: From historical trends to future projections. Environ. Res. Commun. 2024, 6, 095020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zittis, G.; Hadjinicolaou, P.; Fnais, M.; Lelieveld, J. Projected changes in heat wave characteristics in the eastern Mediterranean and the Middle East. Reg. Environ. Change 2016, 16, 1863–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zittis, G.; Hadjinicolaou, P.; Almazroui, M.; Bucchignani, E.; Driouech, F.; El Rhaz, K.; Kurnaz, L.; Nikulin, G.; Ntoumos, A.; Ozturk, T.; et al. Business-as-usual will lead to super and ultra-extreme heatwaves in the Middle East and North Africa. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 2021, 4, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petrou, I.; Kassomenos, P. Local factors contributing to daytime, nighttime, and compound heatwaves in the Eastern mediterranean. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2025, 156, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanarhte, M.; Hadjinicolaou, P.; Lelieveld, J. Heat wave characteristics in the eastern Mediterranean and Middle East using extreme value theory. Clim. Res. 2015, 63, 99–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Founda, D.; Santamouris, M. Synergies between Urban Heat Island and Heat Waves in Athens (Greece), during an extremely hot summer (2012). Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, M.; Kouis, P.; Rudke, A.P.; Athanasiadou, M.; Scoutellas, V.; Tymvios, F.; Nikolaidis, K.; Koutrakis, P.; Yiallouros, P.K.; Alahmad, B. Projections of mortality attributable to hot ambient temperatures in Cyprus under moderate and extreme climate change scenarios. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2024, 262, 114439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kouis, P.; Psistaki, K.; Yiallouros, P.K.; Paschalidou, A.K. The role of heatwave characteristics in cardiovascular mortality in the Eastern Mediterranean region. Environ. Int. 2025, 201, 109563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pyrgou, A.; Hadjinicolaou, P.; Santamouris, M. Enhanced near-surface ozone under heatwave conditions in a Mediterranean island. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 9191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giannakopoulos, C.; Hadjinicolaou, P.; Kostopoulou, E.; Varotsos, K.V.; Zerefos, C. Precipitation and temperature regime over Cyprus as a result of global climate change. Adv. Geosci. 2010, 23, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, F.; Kusaka, H.; Bornstein, R.; Ching, J.; Grimmond, C.S.B.; Grossman-Clarke, S.; Loridan, T.; Manning, K.W.; Martilli, A.; Miao, S.; et al. The integrated WRF/urban modelling system: Development, evaluation, and applications to urban environmental problems. Int. J. Climatol. 2011, 31, 273–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bounoua, L.; Zhang, P.; Mostovoy, G.; Thome, K.; Masek, J.; Imhoff, M.; Shepherd, M.; Quattrochi, D.; Santanello, J.; Silva, J. Impact of urbanization on US surface climate. Environ. Res. Lett. 2015, 10, 084010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martilli, A.; Clappier, A.; Rotach, M.W. An urban surface exchange parameterisation for mesoscale models. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 2002, 104, 261–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giannaros, C.; Melas, D.; Giannaros, T.M. On the short-term simulation of heat waves in the Southeast Mediterranean: Sensitivity of the WRF model to various physics schemes. Atmos. Res. 2019, 218, 99–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, D.; Bou-Zeid, E. Synergistic Interactions between Urban Heat Islands and Heat Waves: The Impact in Cities Is Larger than the Sum of Its Parts. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 2013, 52, 2051–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Mitra, C.; Dong, L.; Yang, Q. Understanding land use change impacts on microclimate using Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2018, 103, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Temimi, M.; Fonseca, R.; Nelli, N.; Weston, M.; Thota, M.; Valappil, V.; Branch, O.; Wizemann, H.-D.; Kondapalli, N.K.; Wehbe, Y.; et al. Assessing the Impact of Changes in Land Surface Conditions on WRF Predictions in Arid Regions. J. Hydrometeorol. 2020, 21, 2829–2853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lal, P.; Shekhar, A.; Kumar, A. Quantifying Temperature and Precipitation Change Caused by Land Cover Change: A Case Study of India Using the WRF Model. Front. Environ. Sci. 2021, 9, 766328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhautmage, U.P.; Ghude, S.D.; Parde, A.N.; Kamath, H.G.; Dhangar, N.G.; Pleim, J.; Wong, M.M.F.; Wagh, S.; Kumar, R.; Niyogi, D.; et al. Implementation of WRF-urban asymmetric convective model (UACM) for simulating urban fog over Delhi, India. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2024, 129, e2024JD040760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skamarock, W.C.; Klemp, J.B.; Dudhia, J.; Gill, D.O.; Liu, Z.; Berner, J.; Wang, W.; Powers, J.G.; Duda, M.G.; Barker, D.M.; et al. A description of the advanced research WRF version 4. In NCAR Technical Notes NCAR/TN-556+STR; National Center for Atmospheric Research: Boulder, CO, USA, 2019; Volume 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niu, G.Y.; Yang, Z.L.; Mitchell, K.E.; Chen, F.; Ek, M.B.; Barlage, M.; Kumar, A.; Manning, K.; Niyogi, D.; Rosero, E.; et al. The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2011, 116, D12109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakanishi, M.; Niino, H. An improved Mellor–Yamada level-3 model: Its characteristics and application to a regional oceanic boundary-layer observation. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 2006, 119, 397–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakanishi, M.; Niino, H. Development of an improved turbulence closure model for the atmospheric boundary layer. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser. II 2009, 87, 895–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iacono, M.J.; Delamere, J.S.; Mlawer, E.J.; Shephard, M.W.; Clough, S.A.; Collins, W.D. Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2008, 113, D13103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, S.Y.; Lim, J.O.J. The WRF single-moment 6-class microphysics scheme (WSM6). Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci. 2006, 42, 129–151. [Google Scholar]
- Grell, G.A.; Freitas, S.R. A scale and aerosol aware stochastic convective parameterization for weather and air quality modeling. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014, 14, 5233–5250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Godfrey, E.S.; Droegemeier, K.; Xue, M.; Tong, M. Assimilation of simulated CASA radar data of varied storm types using EnSRF for convective storm analyses and forecasts. In Preprints, The 22nd Conference on Weather Analysis and Forecasting (WAF) and the 18th Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction; American Meteorological Society: Park City, UT, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Burns, P.; Chemel, C. Evolution of cold-air-pooling processes in complex terrain. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 2014, 150, 423–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hersbach, H.; Bell, B.; Berrisford, P.; Hirahara, S.; Horányi, A.; Muñoz-Sabater, J.; Nicolas, J.; Peubey, C.; Radu, R.; Schepers, D.; et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 2020, 146, 1999–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Good, S.; Fiedler, E.; Mao, C.; Martin, M.J.; Maycock, A.; Reid, R.; Roberts-Jones, J.; Searle, T.; Waters, J.; While, J.; et al. The current configuration of the OSTIA system for operational production of foundation sea surface temperature and ice concentration analyses. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zanaga, D.; Van De Kerchove, R.; Daems, D.; De Keersmaecker, W.; Brockmann, C.; Kirches, G. ESA WorldCover 10 m 2021 v200 (Version v200). Zenodo. 2022. Available online: https://zenodo.org/records/7254221 (accessed on 15 March 2026).
- Department of Meteorology, Republic of Cyprus. Temperature and Its Distribution During July 2023. 2023. Available online: https://www.gov.cy/en/agriculture-rural-development-and-environment/temperature-and-its-distribution-during-july-2023/ (accessed on 3 April 2026).
- The Cyprus Institute. July Was the Warmest Month in the Last 41 Years; Climate and Atmosphere Research Centre of Excellence (EMME-CARE): Nicosia, Cyprus, 2023; Available online: https://emme-care.cyi.ac.cy/cyprus-institute-july-was-the-warmest-month-in-the-last-41-years/ (accessed on 3 April 2026).
- Seidel, D.J.; Zhang, Y.; Beljaars, A.; Golaz, J.C.; Jacobson, A.R.; Medeiros, B. Climatology of the planetary boundary layer over the continental United States and Europe. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2012, 117, D17106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]












| Station | Variables | RMSE (Def) | RMSE (Upd) | DM Stat | p-Value | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larnaca | T2m | 1.548 | 1.429 | 2.657 | 0.0041 | Updated better (Reject H0) |
| RH2m | 15.834 | 15.200 | 1.122 | 0.0312 | Updated better (Reject H0) | |
| WS10 | 1.339 | 1.185 | 2.946 | 0.0017 | Updated better (Reject H0) | |
| Limassol | T2m | 2.444 | 2.303 | 2.846 | 0.0023 | Updated better (Reject H0) |
| RH2m | 19.084 | 17.112 | 3.977 | 0.0000 | Updated better (Reject H0) | |
| WS10 | 1.865 | 1.250 | 7.763 | 0.0000 | Updated better (Reject H0) | |
| Pafos | T2m | 1.822 | 1.509 | 6.271 | 0.0000 | Updated better (Reject H0) |
| RH2m | 16.836 | 15.977 | 1.871 | 0.0311 | Updated better (Reject H0) | |
| WS10 | 1.645 | 1.460 | 5.277 | 0.0000 | Updated better (Reject H0) | |
| Lefkosia | T2m | 2.478 | 2.229 | 10.799 | 0.0000 | Updated better (Reject H0) |
| RH2m | 9.073 | 8.905 | 0.633 | 0.2635 | No significant difference (Fail to Reject H0) | |
| WS10 | 1.873 | 1.897 | −0.835 | 0.7979 | No significant difference (Fail to Reject H0) | |
| Athalassa | T2m | 1.283 | 0.983 | 5.426 | 0.0000 | Updated better (Reject H0) |
| RH2m | 12.054 | 11.036 | 3.260 | 0.0006 | Updated better (Reject H0) | |
| WS10 | 1.825 | 1.557 | 7.670 | 0.0000 | Updated better (Reject H0) | |
| Frenaros | T2m | 2.414 | 2.067 | 9.484 | 0.0000 | Updated better (Reject H0) |
| RH2m | 15.226 | 14.127 | 2.045 | 0.0207 | Updated better (Reject H0) | |
| WS10 | 1.226 | 1.194 | 0.857 | 0.1960 | No significant difference (Fail to Reject H0) | |
| Mathiatis | T2m | 2.264 | 2.135 | 2.388 | 0.0087 | Updated better (Reject H0) |
| RH2m | 8.105 | 7.819 | 0.717 | 0.2368 | No significant difference (Fail to Reject H0) | |
| WS10 | 2.426 | 2.350 | 2.105 | 0.0180 | Updated better (Reject H0) | |
| Polis | T2m | 2.537 | 2.056 | 7.655 | 0.0000 | Updated better (Reject H0) |
| RH2m | 14.103 | 14.046 | 0.168 | 0.4335 | No significant difference (Fail to Reject H0) | |
| WS10 | 1.088 | 0.970 | 3.173 | 0.0008 | Updated better (Reject H0) | |
| Tamasos | T2m | 2.250 | 2.184 | 1.442 | 0.0751 | No significant difference (Fail to Reject H0) |
| RH2m | 10.416 | 9.312 | 1.521 | 0.0301 | Updated better (Reject H0) | |
| WS10 | 1.927 | 1.512 | 11.547 | 0.0000 | Updated better (Reject H0) | |
| Xyliatos | T2m | 1.648 | 1.429 | 5.758 | 0.0000 | Updated better (Reject H0) |
| RH2m | 11.419 | 10.214 | 1.011 | 0.0289 | Updated better (Reject H0) | |
| WS10 | 1.949 | 1.765 | 5.008 | 0.0000 | Updated better (Reject H0) | |
| Prodromos | T2m | 1.361 | 1.081 | 5.533 | 0.0000 | Updated better (Reject H0) |
| RH2m | 5.513 | 5.262 | 1.717 | 0.0434 | Updated better (Reject H0) | |
| WS10 | 1.990 | 1.702 | 6.224 | 0.0000 | Updated better (Reject H0) | |
| Troodos | T2m | 1.527 | 1.480 | 1.450 | 0.0739 | No significant difference (Fail to Reject H0) |
| RH2m | 5.233 | 4.725 | 3.896 | 0.0001 | Updated better (Reject H0) | |
| WS10 | 2.107 | 1.541 | 12.698 | 0.0000 | Updated better (Reject H0) | |
| Kalopanagiotis | T2m | 3.533 | 3.104 | 8.056 | 0.0000 | Updated better (Reject H0) |
| RH2m | 8.712 | 8.495 | 1.294 | 0.0981 | No significant difference (Fail to Reject H0) | |
| WS10 | 1.427 | 0.921 | 10.172 | 0.0000 | Updated better (Reject H0) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Parde, A.N.; Koundal, K.; Bhautmage, U.; Wong, M.M.F.; Oikonomou, C.; Haralambous, H. Role of High-Resolution Land Surface Representation in WRF Model for Forecasting Extreme Heatwave Conditions over Cyprus. Forecasting 2026, 8, 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/forecast8030042
Parde AN, Koundal K, Bhautmage U, Wong MMF, Oikonomou C, Haralambous H. Role of High-Resolution Land Surface Representation in WRF Model for Forecasting Extreme Heatwave Conditions over Cyprus. Forecasting. 2026; 8(3):42. https://doi.org/10.3390/forecast8030042
Chicago/Turabian StyleParde, Avinash N., Kartik Koundal, Utkarsh Bhautmage, Michael Mau Fung Wong, Christina Oikonomou, and Haris Haralambous. 2026. "Role of High-Resolution Land Surface Representation in WRF Model for Forecasting Extreme Heatwave Conditions over Cyprus" Forecasting 8, no. 3: 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/forecast8030042
APA StyleParde, A. N., Koundal, K., Bhautmage, U., Wong, M. M. F., Oikonomou, C., & Haralambous, H. (2026). Role of High-Resolution Land Surface Representation in WRF Model for Forecasting Extreme Heatwave Conditions over Cyprus. Forecasting, 8(3), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/forecast8030042

