Next Article in Journal
The Energy Transition in Colombia: Government Projections and Realistic Scenarios
Previous Article in Journal
Life Cycle of Fuel Cells: From Raw Materials to End-of-Life Management
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Chitosan-Based Composites for Sustainable Textile Production: Applications Across the Lifecycle

1
School of Future Design, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai 519087, China
2
Division of Psychology, Faculty of Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Clean Technol. 2025, 7(4), 95; https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol7040095
Submission received: 16 March 2025 / Revised: 5 September 2025 / Accepted: 25 September 2025 / Published: 3 November 2025

Abstract

The fashion and textile industry (FTI) is a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, resource consumption, and waste generation, necessitating sustainable alternatives. Chitosan, a biodegradable and renewable biopolymer, has shown potential in reducing environmental impact throughout the textile lifecycle. However, existing studies often focus on isolated applications rather than its broader role in industrial sustainability. This review synthesises findings from 142 academic studies to assess chitosan’s applications in textile production, dyeing, finishing, and waste management, emphasising its impact on energy efficiency, carbon reduction, and resource circularity. Chitosan’s biodegradability, antimicrobial properties, and affinity for sustainable dyeing offer a viable alternative to synthetic materials while also enhancing wastewater treatment and eco-friendly finishing techniques. By evaluating its contributions to sustainable manufacturing, this review highlights its potential in supporting decarbonisation and circular economy transitions within the textile sector, while also identifying challenges for future research.

1. Introduction

The fashion and textile industry (FTI) substantially contributes to global greenhouse gas emissions, resource depletion, and environmental pollution, playing a significant role in accelerating climate change [1,2,3,4,5,6]. According to the European Environment Agency, the production and consumption of apparel, footwear, and household textiles rank fifth in terms of greenhouse gas emissions [7]. Among these, the apparel sector is particularly concerning, as it is recognised as one of the most environmentally damaging industries [8,9,10,11,12]. The emergence of the “fast fashion” model has further exacerbated this issue, characterised by intensive resource consumption, short product lifecycles, and significant waste generation [7,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. As a result, integrating sustainability into textile production and consumption has become an urgent necessity [1,14,20,21,22]. Despite the increasing awareness of sustainability challenges, the textile industry continues to face considerable environmental burdens across its entire lifecycle, including pollution, inefficient resource utilisation, and waste accumulation [9,11,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Key stages such as raw material sourcing [9,13,30], fabric dyeing and finishing [31,32,33], and end-of-life waste management [34,35,36] present critical challenges that require targeted sustainable solutions [9,37].
Among the various approaches aimed at improving sustainability in the FTI, biotechnology has gained considerable attention for its potential to mitigate pollution and enhance resource efficiency [38,39,40,41]. Chitosan, a biopolymer sourced from chitin, has drawn increasing interest for its biodegradability, broad-spectrum antimicrobial effects, and diverse functional applications [42,43,44,45]. It is derived from chitin, the second most abundant biopolymer after cellulose, which is found in the exoskeletons of crustaceans and insects, as well as in fungal cell walls. Structurally, chitin is a linear homopolymer composed of N-acetylglucosamine units and exists in three polymorphic forms: α-, β-, and γ-chitin. Through partial deacetylation—a process that removes acetyl groups—chitin is converted into chitosan, a copolymer consisting of D-glucosamine and N-acetylglucosamine (Figure 1). This reaction replaces acetylamino groups with amino groups [43]. It has been applied in multiple textile processes, including fibre modification, dyeing, finishing, and wastewater treatment, where it serves as a viable alternative to synthetic chemicals [46,47,48,49,50]. Chitosan-based treatments have demonstrated the ability to improve dye fixation, enhance fabric durability, and contribute to eco-friendly finishing processes, offering a sustainable alternative to petroleum-derived chemicals [47,48,50]. Furthermore, its use in functional textiles supports the development of moisture-retentive, UV-resistant, and antibacterial fabrics, aligning with sustainability-driven textile innovations [51,52,53].
A key environmental issue currently facing the textile sector is water pollution caused by the discharge of synthetic dyes, heavy metals, and chemical residues from dyeing and finishing processes. Chitosan has been extensively studied for wastewater treatment applications, where it functions as a natural adsorbent capable of removing toxic dyes, heavy metals, and organic pollutants, thereby improving effluent quality and reducing sludge generation [54,55,56,57,58,59]. Its cost-effectiveness, biodegradability, and adsorption efficiency make it a compelling candidate for sustainable water management in textile manufacturing [58,59,60].
Although chitosan’s effectiveness in individual textile applications is well documented, most studies have focused on isolated aspects such as dyeing, finishing, or wastewater treatment, without addressing its potential contributions throughout the entire textile lifecycle. Although previous studies have explored chitosan’s functionality in various textile applications, there is still a lack of integrated reviews that examine its contributions across multiple stages of textile manufacturing and waste management [61,62]. This review seeks to address this gap by focusing on selected stages within the textile lifecycle where chitosan-based technologies have demonstrated the most relevance to sustainability.
This paper aims to systematically evaluate the applications of chitosan-based materials in textiles, with a focus on fibre innovation, eco-friendly dyeing and finishing, and sustainable wastewater management. By synthesising existing research, technological advancements, and environmental benefits, this study explores chitosan’s potential to support decarbonisation, circular economy models, and long-term sustainability in textile manufacturing.
To prepare this review, a comprehensive literature search was conducted using authoritative academic databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar, covering publications from 1999 to 2024. No strict time limitations were imposed, in order to capture both foundational studies and the most recent advancements over the past decade. The search was performed using keyword combinations such as “chitosan”, “textile industry”, “fibre production”, “sustainable dyeing”, “functional finishing”, “textile wastewater treatment”, “biopolymer”, and “circular economy”. This study adopts a narrative review approach rather than a formal systematic review protocol, focusing on research directly relevant to the application of chitosan in the textile field. A total of over 140 peer-reviewed articles, review papers, and relevant conference proceedings were ultimately included, spanning fields such as textile engineering, materials science, and environmental science.
During the process of sorting and analysing the literature, a life-cycle perspective was applied to structure the discussion around key phases including fibre production, dyeing processes, functional finishing, and waste management (particularly wastewater treatment). Each section synthesises and classifies relevant studies according to their role in these stages, thereby building a systematic framework for examining chitosan’s contribution across the textile lifecycle.

2. Production of Chitosan-Based Textile Materials

Chitosan is a natural polymer derived from chitin, which is widely found in crustaceans such as oysters, aphids, and shells. It is the second most abundant biopolymer in nature after cellulose [63,64,65]. Due to its unique physicochemical properties including biocompatibility, non-toxicity, biodegradability, and antimicrobial activity chitosan has garnered significant attention in the textile industry [47,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73]. It has been extensively explored for applications in various industrial fields, including biomedicine [74,75,76] and the food industry [43,77,78,79,80]. In particular, chitosan has emerged as a promising raw material for the development of eco-friendly textile fibres, offering potential solutions to environmental challenges in the textile sector [8,47,81].
As interest grows in textiles that combine functionality with environmental sustainability [82,83,84,85,86,87], natural polymers such as chitosan have attracted considerable interest in textile research [46,47,82]. Chitosan is regarded as a sustainable material with renewability, biodegradability, and excellent functional properties, making it a strong candidate for textile applications [62,74,88,89,90]. Studies indicate that chitosan can be processed into fibres or blended with other natural or synthetic fibres to enhance mechanical performance and functionality [46,62,82,91]. This section explores the preparation methods, structural properties, and applications of chitosan-based textile materials in fibre production.

2.1. Fibre Morphology and Spinning Techniques of Chitosan-Based Materials

Chitosan-based textile materials primarily include chitosan fibres, yarns, and fabrics [92,93]. The two most commonly used techniques for producing chitosan fibres are wet spinning [47,94,95,96] and electrospinning [46,47]. The fundamental properties of chitosan fibres, including fibre length, fineness, surface morphology, cross-sectional shape, and mechanical strength, significantly influence their spinnability and subsequent applications (see Figure 2).
Different spinning processes or endowing methods result in variations in fibre morphology. Studies have shown that cross-sectional shapes of chitosan fibres can be round, oval, polygonal, or irregular, depending on the spinning process used. Some fibres, such as samples I and J, exhibit smooth surfaces, while others, exemplified by samples K, M, D, and E, display grooved structures (see Figure 2). These morphological differences affect fibre spinnability, mechanical behaviour, and fabric performance [97].

2.2. Mechanical Properties and Structural Characteristics of Chitosan Fibres

The structural characteristics of chitosan-based fibres are pivotal to determining their appropriateness for textile use. Two primary factors affecting fibre behaviour are their degree of deacetylation level (DD) and molecular weight (Mw), both of which affect the mechanical strength and processing behaviour of chitosan fibres [92,97,98]. Measurements reveal that chitosan fibres exhibit tensile strengths ranging from 1.40 cN/tex to 1.90 cN/tex and elongation levels from 10.38% to 18.17%. These values suggest that the fibres possess commendable mechanical performance. Among the tested specimens, sample E recorded the greatest tensile strength, whereas sample I displayed the lowest—a difference that may be linked to their respective highest and lowest degree of deacetylation (DD) [97]. Additionally, higher molecular weight chitosan contributes to greater fibre tensile strength, thereby improving its stability and performance in textile applications [97].
Surface morphology also plays a critical role in fibre performance. Smooth-surfaced fibres generally experience lower frictional resistance during processing, while grooved fibres exhibit enhanced dye adsorption and finishing properties [97].

2.3. Antibacterial Properties of Chitosan-Based Fibres

One of the most remarkable advantages of chitosan fibres is their inherent antimicrobial activity, which supports their application in healthcare fabrics, activewear, and performance textiles [92,99,100,101]. Research evidence indicates that their antibacterial efficacy is influenced by both the degree of deacetylation (DD) and molecular weight (Mw). A higher DD introduces more positively charged amino groups, enhancing interactions with bacterial membranes and thereby improving the antimicrobial response [97].
The experiments demonstrated that variations in the degree of deacetylation (DD) and molecular weight (Mw) of chitosan fibres led to differing levels of inhibition against S. aureus, E. coli, and C. albicans (Figure 3 and Figure 4) [97]. When the DD levels are similar, the antibacterial effect varies with Mw. For example, the inhibition rates of Staphylococcus aureus for samples I, K, L, and M initially increased with increasing molecular weight, but then decreased at higher molecular weight levels. By comparison, the inhibition rate against Escherichia coli continued to decrease with increasing molecular weight [97].
In addition to pure chitosan fibres, chitosan-based hybrid fibres also exhibit significant antimicrobial properties while enhancing various physical properties of the fibres [92,102,103]. Blending is a common technique in textile production, involving the combination of chitosan with non-reactive fibres either prior to or during spinning to create hybrid yarns. This blending process improves the various physical properties of the chitosan fibres, such as durability [104,105], tensile strength [106], smoothness [103,106], and moisture absorption, while further enhancing the antibacterial activity [53,107,108]. Studies have shown that cotton fibres treated with a chitosan–sericin complex have excellent moisture absorption, water vapour permeability, and air permeability. Figure 5 shows scanning electron microscope (SEM) images comparing untreated fibres, chitosan-treated fibres, sericin-treated fibres, and chitosan–sericin complex-treated fibres. Compared to the untreated fibres, the treated fibres have a less smooth surface, with the granular material forming surface irregularities during the finishing process. These surface changes indicate successful adhesion of the finishing agent, as the untreated fibres originally had a uniform and smooth texture. The rough surface increases the surface area, which helps to improve functionalities such as antimicrobial activity, UV protection, oxidation resistance, and enhanced wash durability. The antimicrobial properties are particularly significant. As shown in Figure 6, antibacterial activity tests using a sericin extract and a chitosan solution showed that chitosan has a stronger antibacterial effect. In addition, qualitative bacteriostatic circle tests were carried out on untreated control samples, chitosan-treated samples, sericin-treated samples, and chitosan–sericin co-treated samples. As shown in Figure 7, the chitosan-treated fabric was always superior to the sericin-treated fabric in terms of antibacterial effect (Figure 7b). In addition, the chitosan–sericin composite treatment has a synergistic effect, which forms a larger inhibition zone and markedly lowers bacterial counts relative to treatment with sericin alone (Figure 7c) [107].
The wash durability test further confirmed that the chitosan–sericin treated cotton fibres have long-lasting antibacterial properties. After treatment with 5 mg/mL chitosan and 5 mg/mL sericin, the bacterial reduction rate can reach 78%. Even after 10 washes, the fabric still maintained 60–70% of its antibacterial efficacy, highlighting the stability and durability of the antibacterial properties [107].
The proportion of chitin in the mixed fibre and the molecular weight (Mw) also significantly affect the antibacterial activity. Studies have shown that the optimal chitin mixing ratio is about 5–10%. Concentrations exceeding 10% do not significantly improve antibacterial properties [92]. A well-known example of blending to produce antimicrobial fibres is the development of a superfine chitosan powder (particle size of about 5 μm) by Fuji Textiles Co. Ltd. in Japan. This stable chitosan powder was then incorporated into a viscose solution to produce blended chitosan fibres with enhanced antimicrobial properties [109].

3. Application of Chitosan in Textile Dyeing

Extensive research has explored the use of chitosan as a dyeing auxiliary for natural and synthetic fibres in textile processing. In contrast to traditional dyeing techniques, the use of chitosan in salt-free dyeing offers several advantages, including reducing the need for toxic salts, improving dye fixation, minimising dye hydrolysis, and lowering water consumption, which contributes to reducing overall processing costs [110,111]. Due to its abundance of amino groups, chitosan offers extra interaction sites for anionic dyes, including reactive, acid, and direct types. Through electrostatic interactions and van der Waals forces, these dyes are more effectively adsorbed onto fibres and fabrics. As a result, chitosan treatment enhances key dyeing properties, including the affinity of textiles for anionic dyes, colour strength, and dye fastness.

3.1. Enhancement of Colour Strength

Research findings indicate that applying chitosan enhances dye absorption and intensifies colour yield in textile materials. When cotton fabrics are treated with chitosan before dyeing, they exhibit higher dye absorption, as reflected in increased K/S values compared to untreated fabrics [112]. Experiments conducted with CI Reactive Red and CI Reactive Yellow dyes have shown that chitosan treatment enhances dyeing performance in a concentration-dependent manner. However, when the chitosan concentration exceeded 2%, excess chitosan molecules accumulated on the fibre surface, reducing effective dye-binding sites and resulting in a decline in colour yield. The article suggests that the enhancement of colour intensity in cotton fabrics treated with chitosan primarily stems from the formation of ionic bonds between chitosan’s cationic groups and the anionic groups of reactive dye molecules. Additionally, the chitosan treatment cationised the cotton fibre surface, increasing available binding sites and enhancing dye adsorption through electrostatic interactions. Moreover, chitosan forms a thin physical film on the fibre surface, which reduces dye hydrolysis and strengthens dye–fibre bonding. The inhibitory effect of excessive chitosan was confirmed in concentration-dependent experiments, as reflected in the observed increase and subsequent decrease in K/S values [112]. Studies have found that treating cotton fabrics with 15 g/L of chitosan at a curing temperature of 130 °C significantly increases carmine dye adsorption. Longer dyeing times further enhance dye uptake. Higher dyeing temperatures also improve dye adsorption [113].

3.2. Improvement of Dye Fastness

The colour fastness of dyed fabrics plays a vital role in assessing their overall performance. Research has shown that the use of chitosan improves the wash fastness of dyed materials [112]. Compared to untreated samples, cotton fabrics treated with chitosan consistently show improved resistance to washing. The effect of chitosan treatment on fastness is similar for CI Reactive Red and CI Reactive Yellow dyes. The better results of chitosan treatment as compared to the control experiments were attributed to the application of chitosan to cationise the surface of the cellulosic fabrics and the ionic interactions between the cationic groups of chitosan and the anionic groups of the dyes produced strong bonds, which led to better colour fastness properties of the dyed fabrics [112].
Regarding colour fastness, chitosan-treated fabrics exhibited comprehensive improvements. Washing fastness ratings improved from Grade 4 (control) to Grade 4.5, dry rubbing fastness reached Grade 4.5, and wet rubbing fastness increased from Grade 3.5 to Grade 4.0. However, high chitosan concentrations slightly reduced wet rubbing fastness, while light fastness maintained the highest rating (Grade 5) under all conditions. These results demonstrate that a chitosan concentration of 1.5% to 2% effectively balances dye depth and fastness performance while avoiding the negative effects of excessive treatment [112].

4. Application of Chitosan in Textile Finishing

Chitosan exhibits significant potential in textile finishing due to its biocompatibility, antibacterial properties, biodegradability, and chemical tunability [90,100,114]. The literature highlights chitosan’s applicability in textile finishing through a range of techniques, including nanoparticle coatings [81,100], hydrogel treatments [75,99,115], microencapsulation [83,84], and surface coating methods [116,117]. These approaches endow textiles with enhanced functionalities such as ultraviolet (UV) protection, thermal radiation shielding, antioxidation, and water resistance with antimicrobial activity [84,107,118,119]. This chapter explores the functional finishing technologies based on chitosan, integrating relevant research findings to examine its role in improving textile performance and sustainability.

4.1. Ultraviolet Protection

Ultraviolet (UV) radiation can cause fabric degradation, fading, and potential harm to human health. Therefore, improving the UV protection properties of textiles has become a key focus in functional textile research [84]. Chitosan, as an adhesion-promoting material, can be combined with UV-blocking agents such as zinc oxide (ZnO) to enhance the UV shielding capability of fabrics [84].
A study employed an ultrasonic-assisted method to incorporate ZnO into chitosan nanorods, which were subsequently used on cotton textiles through a pad–dry–cure process. The results demonstrated that this composite material significantly enhanced the UV protection of textiles while maintaining excellent antibacterial properties [120]. Another study developed a chitosan–curcumin (CSN-CRN) polyurethane aqueous dispersion (CSN-CRN APUDs) for fabric finishing. The treated textiles exhibited superior UV [121] protection factors (UPF) and reduced UV transmittance compared to untreated fabrics [121]. Chitosan contains N-acetylglucosamine and glucosamine groups that contribute to UV absorption, while the phenolic groups in curcumin also exhibit strong UV absorption properties [50,122]. The synergistic effect of these two components results in varying levels of UV protection depending on the concentration ratios of chitosan and curcumin dispersions [103].

4.2. Thermal Regulation in Textiles

Chitosan-based composite materials can regulate temperature by reflecting solar radiation and enhancing infrared emissivity. A study fabricated chitosan–SiO2 composite fibres via wet spinning, which were subsequently woven into textiles using a commercial weaving machine (Figure 8) [51]. According to the article, Figure 9a shows a digital photograph of the rooftop experimental setup for measuring radiative cooling under sunlight irradiation in Zhenjiang, China; Figure 9b records the 24 h temperature in Zhenjiang, China, on a sunny day (from 09:00 on 7 June 2023 to 09:00 on 8 June 2023), displaying real-time solar irradiance (Isolar) and temperature variations of skin simulators under different experimental conditions, alongside ambient air temperature; Figure 9c shows real-time temperature profiles of skin simulators covered with different textile materials during a continuous 24 h outdoor cooling test in Zhenjiang, China; Figure 9d shows the time-dependent water vapor transmission rates of various textiles, highlighting that the treated CS/SiO2 composite maintains effective transmission of water vapor from human perspiration; Figure 9e shows the systematic characterisation of breathability performance for nylon, cotton, CS, and CS/SiO2; Figure 9f is about the quantitative analysis of liquid water transport differences among these four materials via water evaporation rate measurements. Collectively, these datasets establish a multidimensional evaluation framework for assessing radiative cooling efficiency and wearability comfort of the materials [51].
The resulting fabric exhibited a high solar reflectance of 82.3% and an infrared emissivity of 95.6%, significantly reducing surface temperature [51]. Compared to conventional cotton fabrics, this composite material lowered skin temperature by approximately 5.4 °C. The temperature reduction effect was even more pronounced (11.2 °C) compared to nylon textiles [51].

4.3. Antioxidant Functional Finishing

The antioxidant properties of functional textiles, particularly medical and hygiene-related fabrics, is essential for preventing oxidative degradation and maintaining their structural stability under oxidative conditions [123,124,125]. Studies have shown that chitosan–sericin composite finishing can effectively enhance the antioxidant capacity of cotton fabrics [107].
In this study, the finishing solution containing chitosan, sericin, citric acid, and NaH2PO2 catalyst was applied to cotton fabrics via a pad–dry–cure method under a controlled solution pH. The antioxidant performance of the finished fabrics was evaluated based on their radical scavenging activity (RSA). Experimental data demonstrated that all treated samples exhibited antioxidant activity, with RSA values increasing as the concentration of finishing agents increased [107] (see Table 1).
The %RSA activity was measured by evaluating the reduction in the DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) indicator, a stable free radical characterised by a deep violet colour. Upon encountering an antioxidant, DPPH accepts an electron or hydrogen atom and is reduced, resulting in a visible colour change from violet to yellow. The absorbance of the solution is measured at 517 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer.
In this method,
Where
 A0 = absorbance of DPPH solution without sample (control)
 As = absorbance of DPPH solution with sample
Furthermore, the chitosan–sericin composite finishing not only improved the antioxidant activity of the fabric but also retained the inherent antibacterial properties of chitosan, thereby imparting multifunctionality to the textile [126,127]. Additional studies have confirmed that this finishing treatment does not compromise the biodegradability of the fabric, ensuring that the treated textiles remain environmentally friendly after degradation [107].

4.4. Water-Repellent and Multi-Functional Activity

As a natural polycationic biopolymer, chitosan has found broad use in textile finishing to enhance fabric performance. It has been applied to improve properties including wrinkle resistance [90,109], water and oil repellence [128], flame retardancy [90,129], durability [105,130], blood repellence [131], and antistatic behaviour [132], among others [133,134]. Among these properties, water repellence and antibacterial functionality are particularly important, as they contribute to fabric longevity and broaden its range of applications.
Studies have shown that chitosan combined with silica (SiO2) derived from rice husk ash can effectively impart hydrophobic properties to textiles [81]. The use of SiO2 from rice husk waste provides a low-cost and sustainable method for textile finishing. The application process involves forming a chitosan–SiO2 nanocomposite coating on the fabric surface, which enhances water repellence. Contact angle measurements confirmed that as the concentration of SiO2 and chitosan increased, the contact angle of the treated fabric also increased, reaching a maximum of 161° at a chitosan–SiO2 ratio of 0.8%:1%. This indicates the formation of a superhydrophobic surface. Additionally, the degree of hydrophobicity was influenced by the number of immersion cycles, with contact angles reaching 135° under certain treatment conditions [81] (Figure 10).
In addition to SiO2-based coatings, chitosan alone has been used to enhance the water resistance of textiles. One study demonstrated that chitosan treatment could be applied using a simple impregnation process [109]. In this method, chitosan was dissolved in a 1% (w/v) acetic acid solution, and fabrics were treated via an impregnation–padding–drying process. During drying, chitosan formed a stable protective layer on the fibre surface, increasing water resistance while also improving mechanical strength and durability. Once cured, the chitosan creates an insoluble protective layer on the fibre’s surface. This layer fortifies the fabric, making it more resistant to deformation. Moreover, chitosan molecules fill the tiny fibre pores, establishing hydrogen bonds between the chitosan and the fibres. These bonds strengthen the amorphous areas, decreasing their movement and preventing wrinkles [109].
These results highlight the dual functionality of chitosan-based treatments. The chitosan-SiO2 composite system not only retains chitosan’s inherent antibacterial properties but also significantly enhances the fabric’s hydrophobicity. Since chitosan originates from crustacean exoskeletons, it possesses some intrinsic water-resistant properties, which, when combined with SiO2 from rice husk ash, further improve fabric hydrophobicity. This integrated finishing approach enables textiles to achieve both water repellence and antibacterial performance, expanding their potential applications in various functional and protective textile sectors.

5. Application of Chitosan in Textile Waste Management

5.1. Challenges in Textile Wastewater Treatment and the Functional Roles of Chitosan

Textile production is a significant contributor to industrial wastewater generation [56,57], containing a high concentration of dyes that exhibit strong visibility, resistance to degradation, and toxicity [58,135]. These contaminants severely endanger both ecological systems and human health. Anionic dyes, especially, exhibit poor degradability and potential for bioaccumulation, thereby intensifying environmental contamination [136,137]. Additionally, studies have shown that synthetic wastewater dyes are highly stable and resistant to natural degradation, leading to their prolonged persistence in the environment [136,138].
Currently, wastewater treatment technologies primarily include physicochemical methods (e.g., adsorption, coagulation–flocculation, and membrane separation), which rely on various adsorption mechanisms such as ion exchange, complexation, chelation, electrostatic interactions, and hydrogen bonding, and biochemical methods (e.g., phytoremediation and microbial degradation) [136,137]. Owing to the multiple functional groups and strong adsorption capacity, chitosan can effectively interact with pollutants through these mechanisms and has been widely applied in wastewater treatment [58].
As a natural macromolecular organic compound, chitosan contains hydroxyl (-OH) and amino (-NH2) groups, which act as chelating sites capable of binding with dissolved heavy metals in wastewater [139]. Additionally, its cationic nature, adequate ability to capture pollutants, large molecular framework, wide availability, and economic feasibility make it highly attractive for wastewater treatment applications [140]. According to previous research chitosan and its derivatives, obtained through various modification methods, can effectively remove different types of dyes [60] and have been widely utilised in synthetic and natural dyeing processes in textiles [48,54,141].

5.2. Application of Chitosan in Dye Removal

Due to its highly efficient adsorption properties, chitosan and its composite materials have been widely investigated for dye removal in wastewater treatment [54,58,142,143]. Research has demonstrated that chitosan powder and chitosan microspheres can effectively remove synthetic dyes such as Direct Blue 78 (DB78), with different modification techniques further enhancing adsorption performance [58].
In experimental studies, SEM analysis revealed that before adsorption, chitosan powder revealed an uneven surface featuring a prominently developed pore structure (Figure 11a). After adsorption, the pore structure was significantly reduced due to the saturation of dye molecules (Figure 11b). Additionally, the application of polyacrylamide gel facilitated the sedimentation of chitosan particles, improving treatment efficiency (Figure 10c) [136]. Chitosan and its blends or composites have demonstrated strong adsorption capacities across different dye removal studies and have been widely explored for wastewater treatment applications [58].
Furthermore, studies indicate that the modification of chitosan can significantly enhance its adsorption capacity. Chemically or physically modified chitosan materials can achieve adsorption capacities exceeding 200 mg/g, and after multiple reuse cycles, they can still retain over 80% of their adsorption efficiency [137]. Moreover, surface modifications can enhance the selectivity of chitosan toward specific dyes, further improving wastewater treatment performance [137] (Figure 11).

5.3. Adsorption Performance and Treatment Efficiency of Chitosan-Based Composites

Experimental data (Figure 12) showed that treating synthetic wastewater with 4.5 g/L of chitosan powder or chitosan microspheres led to respective dye removal rates of 94.1% and 80%. [136]. Among these, the combination of chitosan powder and polyacrylamide gel not only enhanced the removal efficiency but also reduced the sedimentation time from 8 h to just 5 min (Figure 11a). In contrast, chitosan microspheres achieved instantaneous sedimentation without requiring additional coagulants but exhibited a slightly lower removal efficiency (Figure 11b) [136]. These results indicate that the morphology of chitosan particles and the use of additives significantly influence adsorption efficiency and sedimentation dynamics (Figure 12).
Additionally, chemical modifications of chitosan can enhance its thermal stability and reusability, thereby improving its cost-effectiveness and environmental applicability in textile wastewater treatment [137]. Recent advancements in chitosan-based materials have focused on improving adsorption efficiency, durability, and adaptability to different wastewater conditions, contributing to the development of more sustainable water treatment technologies.

6. Discussion

This review analyses the applications of chitosan in future applications and current research in the textile sector from a life cycle perspective, integrating findings from 142 academic studies. It provides a comprehensive understanding of the role of chitosan in fibre production, dyeing, finishing, and wastewater treatment. The study highlights the key functional properties of chitosan, including its renewability, biodegradability, antimicrobial activity, and adsorption capacity, and explores its potential in pollution control and resource optimisation within textile manufacturing. Additionally, the review summarises existing research on the use of chitosan in textile production and waste management, as well as its demonstrated effectiveness in eco-friendly dyeing, functional finishing, and wastewater treatment. While chitosan has exhibited promising sustainability characteristics across multiple applications, systematic assessments of its large-scale industrial viability remain relatively limited. Based on the findings presented in earlier sections, this discussion further evaluates chitosan’s contributions to sustainability in the textile industry, assessing its potential in decarbonisation, resource circularity, and market applications, while also identifying challenges and directions for future research.
Chitosan offers significant advantages in reducing carbon emissions and improving resource efficiency in the textile industry. Unlike synthetic polymers derived from fossil fuels, chitosan originates from chitin, a byproduct of the seafood industry. Its utilisation not only mitigates biological waste accumulation but also provides a low-carbon, renewable raw material for textile production [46,62,82,91,144,145]. Studies have demonstrated that chitosan fibres, produced via wet spinning and electrospinning, can partially replace petroleum-based synthetic fibres while maintaining, or in some cases enhancing, mechanical and functional properties [47,51,94,95,96]. Particularly, antimicrobial activity, UV protection, and moisture regulation make chitosan fibres highly desirable for functional textiles such as sportswear and medical fabrics [52,85,89,90]. Moreover, in textile dyeing, chitosan enhances dye fixation efficiency, reducing the need for salts and auxiliaries, thereby lowering dye hydrolysis and wastewater discharge [110,111]. These characteristics contribute to a more resource-efficient dyeing process, aligning with the broader goal of reducing carbon footprints in textile production [47,48]. As industries strive to transition towards low-energy, low-pollution manufacturing models, integrating chitosan-based materials into textile processing presents a viable approach to achieving sustainability objectives.
Chitosan’s biodegradability makes it a promising material for addressing textile waste pollution within a circular economy framework. Unlike conventional synthetic fibres, which often end up in landfills or contribute to microplastic pollution, chitosan-based textiles are suitable for composting or material recovery after use, supporting closed-loop recycling systems [36,92,107]. Additionally, chitosan’s applications in wastewater treatment further enhance its sustainability value. Its high adsorption capacity enables the extraction of colorants, metallic ions, and organic contaminants from textile effluents, thereby improving water quality and facilitating resource recovery [58,59,60]. Compared to energy-intensive coagulation or membrane filtration techniques, chitosan-based treatment methods can minimise the use of additional chemical reagents, reducing the environmental impact while maintaining efficient industrial operations [136,137].
Beyond their sustainability benefits, chitosan’s functional properties present notable market potential. With antimicrobial activity, UV protection, and moisture regulation, chitosan fibres show promise for use in functional textiles, including sportswear and medical fabrics [50,102,107,122]. Research has demonstrated that chitosan-based finishing technologies can provide long-lasting antibacterial effects, enhance fabric durability, and reduce the frequency of product replacement due to material degradation or contamination [104,105,107,112]. These attributes play a dual role in the extended lifespan of textiles and support more sustainable consumption practices by reducing waste and resource consumption [8,43,47]. However, fully leveraging this market potential will require addressing challenges related to cost, processing efficiency, and consumer acceptance.
Although chitosan exhibits many beneficial properties, its large-scale use in textile applications is still hindered by various technical and industrial limitations. Scalability remains a key issue, as the production capacity of chitosan-based fibres is currently lower than that of conventional synthetic fibres. The cost-effectiveness of electrospinning and composite fibre production requires further optimisation to enhance economic viability [43,51,94]. Another challenge concerns the long-term stability of chitosan in textiles. For instance, further investigation is needed to determine whether chitosan-based finishing agents maintain their effectiveness after repeated washing and wear, as well as to evaluate their compatibility with existing textile processing techniques [107]. Additionally, although chitosan production is generally considered environmentally favourable compared to synthetic materials, its overall energy consumption and byproduct management throughout its lifecycle require a more comprehensive assessment to validate its long-term sustainability [69,82].
Addressing these challenges is essential to fully realising the application value of chitosan in the textile field. Future research should focus on improving chitosan processing techniques, enhancing its durability, and expanding its applications in textile manufacturing. Specifically, advancements in high-performance coatings, smart textiles, and biodegradable fibre development could significantly broaden the scope of chitosan’s industrial applications [76,104,109]. Additionally, further refinement of lifecycle assessment (LCA) methodologies will be essential for quantifying chitosan’s environmental benefits across the entire textile supply chain [24,46,82,91].

7. Conclusions

In summary, this review emphasises the transformative potential of chitosan in promoting sustainability in the textile industry. Its role in decarbonisation, resource circularity, and waste management offers a viable pathway for transitioning towards greener, more efficient production models [43,58,59]. Moreover, chitosan’s functional advantages and market appeal position it as a promising alternative to conventional textile materials [53,61,90,107,133]. However, achieving this potential necessitates continued technological refinement, market development, and policy support to facilitate its integration into mainstream textile production.
Despite growing interest, many chitosan-based applications remain at the laboratory scale. Key areas, including wastewater treatment and functional finishing, are still undergoing development and require further technical validation before industrial application is feasible. In addition, the current lack of comprehensive lifecycle assessments and economic evaluations limits the ability to fully quantify long-term impacts. Future research should therefore prioritise scaling production processes and systematically assessing feasibility to support the broader integration of chitosan in sustainable fashion production.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, A.L. and B.Q.; methodology, A.L. and B.Q.; investigation, B.Q.; writing—original draft, A.L. and B.Q.; writing—review and editing, L.K.; supervision, L.K.; project administration, A.L. and L.K.; funding acquisition, A.L. and L.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially supported by the Beijing Normal University Zhuhai Campus Teaching Reform Project (No. jx2024061): Exploration of Ideological and Political Content Design and Implementation Paths in University Aesthetic Education Courses.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ray, S.; Nayak, L. Marketing sustainable fashion: Trends and future directions. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pucker, K.P. The myth of sustainable fashion. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2022, 13, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  3. Khandual, A.; Pradhan, S. Fashion brands and consumers approach towards sustainable fashion. In Fast Fashion, Fashion Brands and Sustainable Consumption; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 37–54. [Google Scholar]
  4. Aakko, M.; Koskennurmi-Sivonen, R. Designing sustainable fashion: Possibilities and challenges. Res. J. Text. Appar. 2013, 17, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gornostaeva, G. Design and sustainability in the fashion industry: The example of independent labels in London. Clean. Responsible Consum. 2024, 15, 100221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, L.; Haider, M.J.; He, J. Should “green information” be interactive? The influence of green information presentation on consumers’ green participation behavior for driving sustainable consumption of fashion brands. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 470, 143329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Iliana, P.; Georgia, C.; Jose Navarro, P.; Irene, V.; María, B.; Antonis, A.Z. Building a new mind set in tomorrow fashion development through circular strategy models in the framework of waste management. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2022, 36, 100638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stella, F.; Fraterrigo Garofalo, S.; Cavallini, N.; Fino, D.; Deorsola, F.A. Closing the loop: Analysis of biotechnological processes for sustainable valorisation of textile waste from the fast fashion industry. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2024, 38, 101481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Voukkali, I.; Papamichael, I.; Loizia, P.; Economou, F.; Stylianou, M.; Naddeo, V.; Zorpas, A.A. Fashioning the Future: Green chemistry and engineering innovations in biofashion. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 497, 155039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Abbate, S.; Centobelli, P.; Cerchione, R.; Nadeem, S.P.; Riccio, E. Sustainability trends and gaps in the textile, apparel and fashion industries. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2023, 26, 2837–2864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, X.; Memon, H.A.; Wang, Y.; Marriam, I.; Tebyetekerwa, M. Circular Economy and Sustainability of the Clothing and Textile Industry. Mater. Circ. Econ. 2021, 3, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Patwary, S. Clothing and Textile Sustainability. Text. Leather Rev. 2020, 3, 158–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Stenton, M.; Kapsali, V.; Blackburn, R.S.; Houghton, J.A. From Clothing Rations to Fast Fashion: Utilising Regenerated Protein Fibres to Alleviate Pressures on Mass Production. Energies 2021, 14, 5654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Carvalho Garcia, C. Fashion futuring: Intertwining speculative design, foresight and material culture towards sustainable futures. Futures 2023, 153, 103242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ermini, C.; Visintin, F.; Boffelli, A. Understanding supply chain orchestration mechanisms to achieve sustainability-oriented innovation in the textile and fashion industry. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2024, 49, 415–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kozlowski, A.; Bardecki, M.; Searcy, C. Environmental Impacts in the Fashion Industry. J. Corp. Citizsh. 2012, 2012, 16–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rathore, D.B. Future of Textile: Sustainable Manufacturing & Prediction via ChatGPT. Eduzone Int. Peer Rev./Ref. Acad. Multidiscip. J. 2023, 12, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mazotto, A.M.; de Ramos Silva, J.; de Brito, L.A.A.; Rocha, N.U.; de Souza Soares, A. How can microbiology help to improve sustainability in the fashion industry? Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 23, 101760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gonçalves, A.; Silva, C. Looking for Sustainability Scoring in Apparel: A Review on Environmental Footprint, Social Impacts and Transparency. Energies 2021, 14, 3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pranta, A.D.; Tareque Rahaman, M.; Reazuddin Repon, M.; Shikder, A.A.R. Environmentally sustainable apparel merchandising of recycled cotton-polyester blended garments: Analysis of consumer preferences and purchasing behaviors. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2024, 10, 100357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gbolarumi, F.T.; Wong, K.Y.; Olohunde, S.T. Sustainability Assessment in The Textile and Apparel Industry: A Review of Recent Studies. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1051, 012099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dragović, N.; Urošević, S.; Vuković, M. Innovation of using 3D printing for textile fibers. In Proceedings of the 7th International Scientific Conference Contemporary Trends and Innovations in Textile Industry—CT&ITI 2024—Zbornik Radova, Belgrade, Serbia, 19–20 September 2024; pp. 274–284. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mazzi, A. Environmental and safety risk assessment for sustainable circular production: Case study in plastic processing for fashion products. Heliyon 2023, 9, e21352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Luján-Ornelas, C.; Güereca, L.P.; Franco-García, M.-L.; Heldeweg, M. A Life Cycle Thinking Approach to Analyse Sustainability in the Textile Industry: A Literature Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Patti, A.; Cicala, G.; Acierno, D. Eco-Sustainability of the Textile Production: Waste Recovery and Current Recycling in the Composites World. Polymers 2020, 13, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rehman, M.; Petrillo, A.; Ortíz-Barrios, M.; Forcina, A.; Baffo, I.; De Felice, F. Sustainable fashion: Mapping waste streams and life cycle management. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 444, 141279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bai, Y.; Chen, J.; Geng, L. Beyond buying less: A functional matching perspective on sustainable fashion product purchasing. J. Environ. Psychol. 2024, 95, 102283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Frazier, R.M.; Vivas, K.A.; Azuaje, I.; Vera, R.; Pifano, A.; Forfora, N.; Jameel, H.; Ford, E.; Pawlak, J.J.; Venditti, R.; et al. Beyond cotton and polyester: An evaluation of emerging feedstocks and conversion methods for the future of fashion industry. J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 2024, 9, 130–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Abdelmeguid, A.; Tsironis, G.; Afy-Shararah, M.; Tsagarakis, K.P.; Salonitis, K. Insights into sustainability and circular economy trends in luxury fashion: A LinkedIn topic modelling study. Clean. Responsible Consum. 2024, 15, 100228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nayak, R.; Jajpura, L.; Khandual, A. Traditional fibres for fashion and textiles: Associated problems and future sustainable fibres. In Sustainable Fibres for Fashion and Textile Manufacturing; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2023; pp. 3–25. [Google Scholar]
  31. Singh, G.B.; Vinayak, A.; Mudgal, G.; Kesari, K.K. Azo dye bioremediation: An interdisciplinary path to sustainable fashion. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2024, 36, 103832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, K.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Li, Z.; Wang, J.; Yu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Wang, P. Conjugation of chitosan oligosaccharide to papain for controllable anti-felting finishing of wool textiles. Ind. Crops Prod. 2024, 222, 119531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kaur, A.; Kumar, A.; Singh, N. Innovative integration of chitosan biopolymer for felt-free woolen fabric: A synergistic approach with digital textile printing. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2024, 42, 101769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Preethi, S.; Abarna, K.; Nithyasri, M.; Kishore, P.; Deepika, K.; Ranjithkumar, R.; Bhuvaneshwari, V.; Bharathi, D. Synthesis and characterization of chitosan/zinc oxide nanocomposite for antibacterial activity onto cotton fabrics and dye degradation applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 2779–2787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chopra, S.S.; Dong, L.; Kaur, G.; Len, C.; Ki Lin, C.S. Sustainable process design for circular fashion: Advances in sustainable chemistry for textile waste valorisation. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2023, 39, 100747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Junceda-Mena, I.; Garcia-Junceda, E.; Revuelta, J. From the problem to the solution: Chitosan valorization cycle. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 309, 120674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Keßler, L.; Matlin, S.A.; Kümmerer, K. The contribution of material circularity to sustainability—Recycling and reuse of textiles. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2021, 32, 100535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rahman, M.; Billah, M.M.; Hack-Polay, D.; Alam, A. The use of biotechnologies in textile processing and environmental sustainability: An emerging market context. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2020, 159, 120204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Schiros, T.N.; Mosher, C.Z.; Zhu, Y.; Bina, T.; Gomez, V.; Lee, C.L.; Lu, H.H.; Obermeyer, A.C. Bioengineering textiles across scales for a sustainable circular economy. Chem 2021, 7, 2913–2926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Joshi, M. THE FUTURE OF FASHION: BIOTECH AND NANOTECHNOLOGY IN SMART CLOTHING. Am. J. Interdiscip. Innov. Res. J. Text. Appar. 2024, 6, 21–27. [Google Scholar]
  41. Amobonye, A.; Lalung, J.; Awasthi, M.K.; Pillai, S. Fungal mycelium as leather alternative: A sustainable biogenic material for the fashion industry. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2023, 38, e00724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hameed, A.Z.; Raj, S.A.; Kandasamy, J.; Baghdadi, M.A.; Shahzad, M.A. Chitosan: A Sustainable Material for Multifarious Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 2335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Maliki, S.; Sharma, G.; Kumar, A.; Moral-Zamorano, M.; Moradi, O.; Baselga, J.; Stadler, F.J.; Garcia-Penas, A. Chitosan as a Tool for Sustainable Development: A Mini Review. Polymers 2022, 14, 1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kostag, M.; El Seoud, O.A. Sustainable biomaterials based on cellulose, chitin and chitosan composites—A review. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2021, 2, 100079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shahid Ul, I.; Butola, B.S. A synergistic combination of shrimp shell derived chitosan polysaccharide with Citrus sinensis peel extract for the development of colourful and bioactive cellulosic textile. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 158, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, J.; Zhuang, S. Chitosan-based materials: Preparation, modification and application. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 355, 131825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Elamri, A.; Zdiri, K.; Hamdaoui, M.; Harzallah, O. Chitosan: A biopolymer for textile processes and products. Text. Res. J. 2022, 93, 1456–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Costa, E.M.; Silva, S.; Veiga, M.; Baptista, P.; Tavaria, F.K.; Pintado, M.E. Textile dyes loaded chitosan nanoparticles: Characterization, biocompatibility and staining capacity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 251, 117120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Raza Naqvi, S.A.; Kaif, U.-W.; Adeel, S.; Mia, R.; Hosseinnezhad, M.; Rather, L.J.; Imran, M. Modern ecofriendly approach for extraction of luteolin natural dye from weld for silk fabric and wool yarn dyeing. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2024, 39, 101554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shirvan, A.R.; Shakeri, M.; Bashari, A. Recent advances in application of chitosan and its derivatives in functional finishing of textiles. In The Impact and Prospects of Green Chemistry for Textile Technology; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2019; pp. 107–133. [Google Scholar]
  51. Cheng, C.; Xiaoyu, J.; Xiaorui, L.; Mingyang, S.; Jiayi, H.; Mengyao, S.; Shuwang, W.; Hongliang, D.; Xingang, W.; Hongya, G. Scalable wet-spinning of wearable chitosan-silica textile for all-day radiative cooling. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 475, 146307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ali, I.H.; Elkashlan, A.M.; Hammad, M.A.; Hamdi, M. Antimicrobial and anti-SARS-CoV-2 activities of smart daclatasvir-chitosan/gelatin nanoparticles-in-PLLA nanofibrous medical textiles; in vitro, and in vivo study. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 253, 127350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fu, X.; Shen, Y.; Jiang, X.; Huang, D.; Yan, Y. Chitosan derivatives with dual-antibacterial functional groups for antimicrobial finishing of cotton fabrics. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 85, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yan, B.; Dai, Y.; Xin, L.; Li, M.; Zhang, H.; Long, H.; Gao, X. Research progress in the degradation of printing and dyeing wastewater using chitosan based composite photocatalytic materials. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 263, 130082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. de Medeiros, A.D.L.M.; da Silva Junior, C.J.G.; de Amorim, J.D.P.; do Nascimento, H.A.; Converti, A.; Costa, A.F.d.S.; Sarubbo, L.A. Biocellulose for Treatment of Wastewaters Generated by Energy Consuming Industries: A Review. Energies 2021, 14, 5066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Holkar, C.R.; Jadhav, A.J.; Pinjari, D.V.; Mahamuni, N.M.; Pandit, A.B. A critical review on textile wastewater treatments: Possible approaches. J Environ. Manag. 2016, 182, 351–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Gosavi, V.D.; Sharma, S. A general review on various treatment methods for textile wastewater. J. Environ. Sci. Comput. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2014, 3, 29–39. [Google Scholar]
  58. Qamar, S.A.; Ashiq, M.; Jahangeer, M.; Riasat, A.; Bilal, M. Chitosan-based hybrid materials as adsorbents for textile dyes–A review. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2020, 2, 100021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Vakili, M.; Rafatullah, M.; Salamatinia, B.; Abdullah, A.Z.; Ibrahim, M.H.; Tan, K.B.; Gholami, Z.; Amouzgar, P. Application of chitosan and its derivatives as adsorbents for dye removal from water and wastewater: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 113, 115–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kyzas, G.Z.; Bikiaris, D.N.; Mitropoulos, A.C. Chitosan adsorbents for dye removal: A review. Polym. Int. 2017, 66, 1800–1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ibrahim, N.A.; Eid, B.M.; El-Aziz, E.A.; Elmaaty, T.M.A.; Ramadan, S.M. Loading of chitosan—Nano metal oxide hybrids onto cotton/polyester fabrics to impart permanent and effective multifunctions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 105, 769–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Tien, N.D.; Lyngstadaas, S.P.; Mano, J.F.; Blaker, J.J.; Haugen, H.J. Recent Developments in Chitosan-Based Micro/Nanofibers for Sustainable Food Packaging, Smart Textiles, Cosmeceuticals, and Biomedical Applications. Molecules 2021, 26, 2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lingait, D.; Rahagude, R.; Gaharwar, S.S.; Das, R.S.; Verma, M.G.; Srivastava, N.; Kumar, A.; Mandavgane, S. A review on versatile applications of biomaterial/polycationic chitosan: An insight into the structure-property relationship. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 257, 128676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Li, C.; Xie, X.; Li, G.; Hu, Z.; Li, S. Research Progress of Chitosan-Based Biomimetic Materials. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lee, D.; Lim, H.; Chong, H.; Shim, W. Advances in Chitosan Material and its Hybrid Derivatives: A Review. Open Biomater. J. 2009, 1, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Picos-Corrales, L.A.; Morales-Burgos, A.M.; Ruelas-Leyva, J.P.; Crini, G.; Garcia-Armenta, E.; Jimenez-Lam, S.A.; Ayon-Reyna, L.E.; Rocha-Alonzo, F.; Calderon-Zamora, L.; Osuna-Martinez, U.; et al. Chitosan as an Outstanding Polysaccharide Improving Health-Commodities of Humans and Environmental Protection. Polymers 2023, 15, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Roy, J.; Salaün, F.; Giraud, S.; Ferri, A.; Guan, J. Chitosan-Based Sustainable Textile Technology: Process, Mechanism, Innovation, and Safety. In Biological Activities and Application of Marine Polysaccharides; Books on Demand: Norderstedt, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  68. Yang, S.; Song, Z.; He, Z.; Ye, X.; Li, J.; Wang, W.; Zhang, D.; Li, Y. A review of chitosan-based shape memory materials: Stimuli-responsiveness, multifunctionalities and applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2024, 323, 121411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Ahmed, S.; Ikram, S. Chitosan & its derivatives: A review in recent innovations. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. J. Text. Appar. 2015, 6, 14–30. [Google Scholar]
  70. Karamchandani, B.M.; Dalvi, S.G.; Bagayatkar, M.; Banat, I.M.; Satpute, S.K. Prospective applications of chitosan and chitosan-based nanoparticles formulations in sustainable agricultural practices. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2024, 58, 103210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Liu, Z.; Wang, L.; Zhao, X.; Luo, Y.; Zheng, K.; Wu, M. Highly effective antibacterial AgNPs@hinokitiol grafted chitosan for construction of durable antibacterial fabrics. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 209, 963–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Chakravarty, J.; Edwards, T.A. Innovation from waste with biomass-derived chitin and chitosan as green and sustainable polymer: A review. Energy Nexus 2022, 8, 100149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zhou, B.C.-E.; Kan, C.-w.; Sun, C.; Du, J.; Xu, C. A Review of Chitosan Textile Applications. AATCC J. Res. 2022, 6, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Nwabike Amitaye, A.; Elemike, E.E.; Akpeji, H.B.; Amitaye, E.; Hossain, I.; Mbonu, J.I.; Aziza, A.E. Chitosan: A sustainable biobased material for diverse applications. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 113208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mishra, A.; Omoyeni, T.; Singh, P.K.; Anandakumar, S.; Tiwari, A. Trends in sustainable chitosan-based hydrogel technology for circular biomedical engineering: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 276, 133823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kim, H.C.; Mun, S.; Ko, H.-U.; Zhai, L.; Kafy, A.; Kim, J. Renewable smart materials. Smart Mater. Struct. 2016, 25, 073001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Liu, Z.; Wang, S.; Liang, H.; Zhou, J.; Zong, M.; Cao, Y.; Lou, W. A review of advancements in chitosan-essential oil composite films: Better and sustainable food preservation with biodegradable packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 274, 133242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Tabassum, Z.; Mohan, A.; Girdhar, M. Insight into recent trends in ZnO nanoparticle reinforced chitosan-based composite films for sustainable packaging: A critical review on its current status, challenges and perspective. Mater. Today Proc. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chen, Z.; Zhang, W.; Yuan, Z.; Wang, Z.; Ma, R.; Chen, K. Preparation of strawberry chitosan composite microcapsules and their application in textiles. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022, 652, 129845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Tamzid, F.; Sakhawat, S.B.; Rashid, T.U. Chitosan based electrospun nanofibrous materials: A sustainable alternative for food packaging. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 151, 104617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rahmadhani, D.; Yuliani, K.D.; Frida, E.; Taufiq, A. Hydrophobic and antibacterial properties of textiles using nanocomposite chitosan and SiO2 from rice husk ash as-coating. S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 2024, 48, 366–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Rahaman, M.T.; Khan, M.S.H. Applications of green nano textile materials for environmental sustainability and functional performance: Past, present and future perspectives. Nano-Struct. Nano-Objects 2024, 40, 101332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Massella, D.; Giraud, S.; Guan, J.; Ferri, A.; Salaün, F. Manufacture Techniques of Chitosan-Based Microcapsules to Enhance Functional Properties of Textiles. In Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 35. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 303–336. [Google Scholar]
  84. Massella, D.; Giraud, S.; Guan, J.; Ferri, A.; Salaün, F. Textiles for health: A review of textile fabrics treated with chitosan microcapsules. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2019, 17, 1787–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ivanoska-Dacikj, A.; Oguz-Gouillart, Y.; Hossain, G.; Kaplan, M.; Sivri, C.; Ros-Lis, J.V.; Mikucioniene, D.; Munir, M.U.; Kizildag, N.; Unal, S.; et al. Advanced and Smart Textiles during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic: Issues, Challenges, and Innovations. Healthcare 2023, 11, 1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Desore, A.; Narula, S.A. An overview on corporate response towards sustainability issues in textile industry. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2017, 20, 1439–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hou, Z.; Liu, X.; Tian, M.; Zhang, X.; Qu, L.; Fan, T.; Miao, J. Smart fibers and textiles for emerging clothe-based wearable electronics: Materials, fabrications and applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2023, 11, 17336–17372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Cavallaro, G.; Micciulla, S.; Chiappisi, L.; Lazzara, G. Chitosan-based smart hybrid materials: A physico-chemical perspective. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 9, 594–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Foong, S.Y.; Chan, Y.H.; Yiin, C.L.; Lock, S.S.M.; Loy, A.C.M.; Lim, J.Y.; Yek, P.N.Y.; Wan Mahari, W.A.; Liew, R.K.; Peng, W.; et al. Sustainable CO2 capture via adsorption by chitosan-based functional biomaterial: A review on recent advances, challenges, and future directions. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023, 181, 113342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Teli, M.D.; Sheikh, J.; Bhavsar, P. Multifunctional finishing of cotton using chitosan extracted from bio-waste. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 54, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Thambiliyagodage, C.; Jayanetti, M.; Mendis, A.; Ekanayake, G.; Liyanaarachchi, H.; Vigneswaran, S. Recent Advances in Chitosan-Based Applications-A Review. Materials 2023, 16, 2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Li, J.; Tian, X.; Hua, T.; Fu, J.; Koo, M.; Chan, W.; Poon, T. Chitosan Natural Polymer Material for Improving Antibacterial Properties of Textiles. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2021, 4, 4014–4038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Korkmaz, A.; Babaarslan, O. Chitosan Added Composite Viscose Yarn and Its Potential Application for Denim Fabric Development. Fibres Text. 2023, 30, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Yudin, V.E.; Dobrovolskaya, I.P.; Neelov, I.M.; Dresvyanina, E.N.; Popryadukhin, P.V.; Ivan’kova, E.M.; Elokhovskii, V.Y.; Kasatkin, I.A.; Okrugin, B.M.; Morganti, P. Wet spinning of fibers made of chitosan and chitin nanofibrils. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 108, 176–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Mohammadkhani, G.; Kumar Ramamoorthy, S.; Adolfsson, K.H.; Mahboubi, A.; Hakkarainen, M.; Zamani, A. New solvent and coagulating agent for development of chitosan fibers by wet spinning. Polymers 2021, 13, 2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kuznik, I.; Kruppke, I.; Cherif, C. Pure Chitosan-Based Fibers Manufactured by a Wet Spinning Lab-Scale Process Using Ionic Liquids. Polymers 2022, 14, 477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Li, J.; Fu, J.; Tian, X.; Hua, T.; Poon, T.; Koo, M.; Chan, W. Characteristics of chitosan fiber and their effects towards improvement of antibacterial activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 280, 119031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Qin, C.; Li, H.; Xiao, Q.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, J.; Du, Y. Water-solubility of chitosan and its antimicrobial activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2006, 63, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Bashari, A.; Hemmati Nejad, N.; Pourjavadi, A. Applications of stimuli responsive hydrogels: A textile engineering approach. J. Text. Inst. 2013, 104, 1145–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Shukla, S.K.; Mishra, A.K.; Arotiba, O.A.; Mamba, B.B. Chitosan-based nanomaterials: A state-of-the-art review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 59, 46–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Vo-An, Q.; Nguyen, C.T.; Pham, U.T.; Nguyen, T.A.; Nguyen, D.T.; Hoang, D.T.; Le, L.T.; Ngo, Q.T.C.; Thai, H. Antibacterial and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Chitosan Film with Rhodomyrtus Tomentosa Leaf Extract Prepared Via 3D-Printing Method. ChemistryOpen 2024, 14, e202400302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Fernandes, J.C.; Tavaria, F.K.; Fonseca, S.C.; Ramos, Ó.S.; Pintado, M.E.; Malcata, F.X. In vitro screening for antimicrobial activity of chitosans and chitooligosaccharides, aiming at potential uses in functional textiles. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 20, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Arshad, N.; Javaid, M.A.; Zia, K.M.; Hussain, M.T.; Arshad, M.M.; Tahir, U. Development of biocompatible aqueous polyurethane dispersions using chitosan and curcumin to improve physicochemical properties of textile surfaces. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 251, 126196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Luo, X.; Yao, M.Y.; Li, L. Application of chitosan in the form of textile: Production and sourcing. Text. Res. J. 2022, 92, 3522–3533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Öktem, T. Surface treatment of cotton fabrics with chitosan. Color. Technol. 2006, 119, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Şahan, G.; Demir, A. A green application of nano sized chitosan in textile finishing. Text. Appar. 2016, 26, 414–420. [Google Scholar]
  107. Mondal, M.I.H.; Sarker, S.C.; Ahmed, F.; Pervez, M.N.; Saha, J. Fabrication of sustainable functional cotton fabric with silk sericin and chitosan for protective textiles. Heliyon 2024, 10, e39250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Yu, J.; Pang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, H.; Wei, Q. Conductivity and antibacterial properties of wool fabrics finished by polyaniline/chitosan. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2018, 548, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Huang, L.; Xiao, L.; Yang, G. Chitosan application in textile processing. Curr. Trends Fash. Technol. Text. Eng. 2018, 4, 32–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Bhuiyan, M.A.R.; Shaid, A.; Khan, M.A. Cationization of Cotton Fiber by Chitosan and Its Dyeing with Reactive Dye without Salt. Chem. Mater. Eng. 2014, 2, 96–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Lim, S.H.; Hudson, S.H. Application of a fibre-reactive chitosan derivative to cotton fabric as a zero-salt dyeing auxiliary. Color. Technol. 2006, 120, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Chatha, S.S.; Hussain, A.; Ali, S.; Saif, M.J.; Mallhi, A.; Sagir, M.; Naz, M. Significance of chitosan to improve the substantivity of reactive dyes. J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 2016, 61, 2895–2897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Ke, G.; Zhu, K.; Chowdhury, M.H. Dyeing of Cochineal Natural Dye on Cotton Fabrics Treated with Oxidant and Chitosan. J. Nat. Fibers 2019, 18, 317–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ferrero, F.; Periolatto, M. Antimicrobial finish of textiles by chitosan UV-curing. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2012, 12, 4803–4810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Taurino, R.; Cannio, M.; Caporali, S.; Martinuzzi, S.; Boccaccini, D. Design and characterization of based chitosan sol-gel films for textile substrates: Traditional and 3D printing processes approach. In Proceedings of the 13th International Colloids Conference, Sitges, Spain, 9–12 June 2024. [Google Scholar]
  116. Priyadarshi, R.; El-Araby, A.; Rhim, J.W. Chitosan-based sustainable packaging and coating technologies for strawberry preservation: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 278, 134859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zheng, G.; Cui, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Zhou, M.; Yu, Y.; Wang, P.; Wang, Q. Fiber-based photothermal, UV-resistant, and self-cleaning coatings fabricated by silicon grafted copolymers of chitosan derivatives and gallic acid. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 222, 1560–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Peng, X.; Umer, M.; Pervez, M.N.; Hasan, K.M.F.; Habib, M.A.; Islam, M.S.; Lin, L.; Xiong, X.; Naddeo, V.; Cai, Y. Biopolymers-based microencapsulation technology for sustainable textiles development: A short review. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2023, 7, 100349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Tian, W.; Chen, L.; Zhang, X.; Wu, Y. Anti-pilling of Cashmere Knitted Fabric Based on Siloxane-Modified Chitosan. Fibers Polym. 2023, 24, 4287–4300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. AbdElhady, M.M. Preparation and Characterization of Chitosan/Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles for Imparting Antimicrobial and UV Protection to Cotton Fabric. Int. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 2012, 2012, 840591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Muzaffar, S.; Abbas, M.; Siddiqua, U.H.; Arshad, M.; Tufail, A.; Ahsan, M.; Alissa, S.A.; Abubshait, S.A.; Abubshait, H.A.; Iqbal, M. Enhanced mechanical, UV protection and antimicrobial properties of cotton fabric employing nanochitosan and polyurethane based finishing. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 11, 946–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Abd El-Hady, M.M.; Farouk, A.; Saeed, S.E.; Zaghloul, S. Antibacterial and UV Protection Properties of Modified Cotton Fabric Using a Curcumin/TiO(2) Nanocomposite for Medical Textile Applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 4027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Turkoğlu, G.C.; Sarıışık, A.M.; Erkan, G.; Kayalar, H.; Kontart, O.; Öztuna, S. Determination of antioxidant capacity of capsule loaded textiles. Indian J. Fibre Text. Res. (IJFTR) 2017, 42, 189–195. [Google Scholar]
  124. Ali, M.A.; Abdel-Moein, N.M.; Owis, A.S.; Ahmed, S.E.; Hanafy, E.A. Eco-friendly lignin nanoparticles as antioxidant and antimicrobial material for enhanced textile production. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 17470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Mazzon, G.; Contardi, M.; Quilez-Molina, A.; Zahid, M.; Zendri, E.; Athanassiou, A.; Bayer, I.S. Antioxidant and hydrophobic Cotton fabric resisting accelerated ageing. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 613, 126061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Guzmán, E.; Ortega, F.; Rubio, R.G. Chitosan: A Promising Multifunctional Cosmetic Ingredient for Skin and Hair Care. Cosmetics 2022, 9, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ilyas, R.A.; Aisyah, H.A.; Nordin, A.H.; Ngadi, N.; Zuhri, M.Y.M.; Asyraf, M.R.M.; Sapuan, S.M.; Zainudin, E.S.; Sharma, S.; Abral, H.; et al. Natural-Fiber-Reinforced Chitosan, Chitosan Blends and Their Nanocomposites for Various Advanced Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Ivanova, N.A.; Philipchenko, A.B. Superhydrophobic chitosan-based coatings for textile processing. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 263, 783–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Patankar, K.C.; Biranje, S.; Pawar, A.; Maiti, S.; Shahid, M.; More, S.; Adivarekar, R.V. Fabrication of chitosan-based finishing agent for flame-retardant, UV-protective, and antibacterial cotton fabrics. Mater. Today Commun. 2022, 33, 104637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Flincec Grgac, S.; Tarbuk, A.; Dekanic, T.; Sujka, W.; Draczynski, Z. The Chitosan Implementation into Cotton and Polyester/Cotton Blend Fabrics. Materials 2020, 13, 1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Lee, S.; Cho, J.-S.; Cho, G. Antimicrobial and Blood Repellent Finishes for Cotton and Nonwoven Fabrics Based on Chitosan and Fluoropolymers. Text. Res. J. 1999, 69, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Abdel-Halim, E.S.; Abdel-Mohdy, F.A.; Al-Deyab, S.S.; El-Newehy, M.H. Chitosan and monochlorotriazinyl-β-cyclodextrin finishes improve antistatic properties of cotton/polyester blend and polyester fabrics. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 82, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Klinkhammer, K.; Hohenbild, H.; Hoque, M.T.; Elze, L.; Teshay, H.; Mahltig, B. Functionalization of Technical Textiles with Chitosan. Textiles 2024, 4, 70–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Gobalakrishnan, M.; Saravanan, D.; Das, S. Sustainable Finishing Process Using Natural Ingredients. In Sustainability in the Textile and Apparel Industries; Sustainable Textiles: Production, Processing, Manufacturing & Chemistry; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 129–146. [Google Scholar]
  135. Khan, S.; Malik, A. Toxicity evaluation of textile effluents and role of native soil bacterium in biodegradation of a textile dye. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 4446–4458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Elzahar, M.M.H.; Bassyouni, M. Removal of direct dyes from wastewater using chitosan and polyacrylamide blends. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 15750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Hevira, L.; Ighalo, J.O.; Sondari, D. Chitosan-based polysaccharides for effective synthetic dye adsorption. J. Mol. Liq. 2024, 393, 123604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. El Sayed, N.A.A.; El-Bendary, M.A.; Ahmed, O.K. A sustainable approach for linen dyeing and finishing with natural lac dye through chitosan bio-mordanting and microwave heating. J. Eng. Fibers Fabr. 2023, 18, 15589250231155882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Ibrahim, M.A.; Alhalafi, M.H.; Emam, E.M.; Ibrahim, H.; Mosaad, R.M. A Review of Chitosan and Chitosan Nanofiber: Preparation, Characterization, and Its Potential Applications. Polymers 2023, 15, 2820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Muzzarelli, R.A.; Boudrant, J.; Meyer, D.; Manno, N.; DeMarchis, M.; Paoletti, M.G. Current views on fungal chitin/chitosan, human chitinases, food preservation, glucans, pectins and inulin: A tribute to Henri Braconnot, precursor of the carbohydrate polymers science, on the chitin bicentennial. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 995–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Sirajudheen, P.; Poovathumkuzhi, N.C.; Vigneshwaran, S.; Chelaveettil, B.M.; Meenakshi, S. Applications of chitin and chitosan based biomaterials for the adsorptive removal of textile dyes from water—A comprehensive review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 273, 118604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Mishra, A.; Natarajan, S. Chitosan—A Promising Biomaterial for Dye Elimination. In Novel Materials for Dye-containing Wastewater Treatment; Sustainable Textiles: Production, Processing, Manufacturing & Chemistry; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 59–83. [Google Scholar]
  143. Le, H.Q.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Ardiyanta, D.; Shimoyama, Y. CO(2)-Activated Adsorption: A New Approach to Dye Removal by Chitosan Hydrogel. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 14103–14110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Indu, G.; Murthy, E.K.; Mahalakshmi, V.; Srinivasulu, K. Study on Bio-Based Textile Fibers. Front. Health Inform. 2024, 13, 8059–8074. [Google Scholar]
  145. Kulka, K.; Sionkowska, A. Chitosan Based Materials in Cosmetic Applications: A Review. Molecules 2023, 28, 1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Chemical structure of chitosan (reprinted with permission from Ref. [43]. Copyright 2022 MDPI).
Figure 1. Chemical structure of chitosan (reprinted with permission from Ref. [43]. Copyright 2022 MDPI).
Cleantechnol 07 00095 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of (a,b) D chitosan fibre; (c,d) E chitosan fibre; (e,f) F chitosan fibre; (g,h) I chitosan fibre; (i,j) J chitosan fibre; (k,l) K chitosan fibre; (m,n) L chitosan fibre; (o,p) M chitosan fibre. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [97]. Copyright 2022 Elsevier).
Figure 2. SEM images of (a,b) D chitosan fibre; (c,d) E chitosan fibre; (e,f) F chitosan fibre; (g,h) I chitosan fibre; (i,j) J chitosan fibre; (k,l) K chitosan fibre; (m,n) L chitosan fibre; (o,p) M chitosan fibre. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [97]. Copyright 2022 Elsevier).
Cleantechnol 07 00095 g002
Figure 3. Inhibition rate of chitosan fibres (D, E, F, I, J, K, L and M are fiber samples of chitosan fibers derived from crab shell) with different Mw and DD against (a) S. aureus; (b) E. coli; (c) C. albicans. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [97]. Copyright 2022 Elsevier).
Figure 3. Inhibition rate of chitosan fibres (D, E, F, I, J, K, L and M are fiber samples of chitosan fibers derived from crab shell) with different Mw and DD against (a) S. aureus; (b) E. coli; (c) C. albicans. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [97]. Copyright 2022 Elsevier).
Cleantechnol 07 00095 g003
Figure 4. Bactericidal rate of chitosan fibres (D, E, F, I, J, K, L and M are fiber samples of chitosan fibers de-rived from crab shell) with different Mw and DD against (a) S. aureus; (b) E. coli. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [97]. Copyright 2022 Elsevier).
Figure 4. Bactericidal rate of chitosan fibres (D, E, F, I, J, K, L and M are fiber samples of chitosan fibers de-rived from crab shell) with different Mw and DD against (a) S. aureus; (b) E. coli. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [97]. Copyright 2022 Elsevier).
Cleantechnol 07 00095 g004
Figure 5. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of (a) untreated control; (b) chitosan-finished surface; (c) sericin-finished surface; (d) chitosan-sericin co-finished surface. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [107]. Copyright 2024 Elsevier).
Figure 5. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of (a) untreated control; (b) chitosan-finished surface; (c) sericin-finished surface; (d) chitosan-sericin co-finished surface. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [107]. Copyright 2024 Elsevier).
Cleantechnol 07 00095 g005
Figure 6. Antimicrobial activity testing against Staphylococcus aureus (gram-positive bacteria): (a) untreated control; (b) sericin extract; (c) chitosan solution. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [107]. Copyright 2024 Elsevier).
Figure 6. Antimicrobial activity testing against Staphylococcus aureus (gram-positive bacteria): (a) untreated control; (b) sericin extract; (c) chitosan solution. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [107]. Copyright 2024 Elsevier).
Cleantechnol 07 00095 g006
Figure 7. Images of inhibition zones from qualitative antimicrobial testing: (a) untreated fabric; (b) chitosan-treated; (c) combined chitosan–sericin treated; (d) sericin-treated. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [107]. Copyright 2024 Elsevier).
Figure 7. Images of inhibition zones from qualitative antimicrobial testing: (a) untreated fabric; (b) chitosan-treated; (c) combined chitosan–sericin treated; (d) sericin-treated. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [107]. Copyright 2024 Elsevier).
Cleantechnol 07 00095 g007
Figure 8. CS/SiO2 textiles’ radiative cooling performance under controlled outdoor simulation conditions: (a) thermal measurement setup incorporating a solar simulator; (b,c) all-day temperature comparison of CS/SiO2, nylon, and cotton (recorded: daytime 11:00–13:00; nighttime 17:00–20:00); (d) IR images of human body covered by cotton versus CS/SiO2 fabric. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [51]. Copyright 2023 Elsevier).
Figure 8. CS/SiO2 textiles’ radiative cooling performance under controlled outdoor simulation conditions: (a) thermal measurement setup incorporating a solar simulator; (b,c) all-day temperature comparison of CS/SiO2, nylon, and cotton (recorded: daytime 11:00–13:00; nighttime 17:00–20:00); (d) IR images of human body covered by cotton versus CS/SiO2 fabric. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [51]. Copyright 2023 Elsevier).
Cleantechnol 07 00095 g008
Figure 9. CS/SiO2 textiles with practical all-day cooling and enhanced wearability: (a) measurement of radiative cooling in a roof test facility under sunlight exposure; (b) 24 h temperature in Zhenjiang, China, on a sunny day; (c) real-time temperature profiles of skin simulators covered with different textile materials; (d) water vapor transmission rates over time; (e) systematic characterisation of breathability performance; and (f) quantitative analysis of liquid water transport differences. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [51]. Copyright 2023 Elsevier).
Figure 9. CS/SiO2 textiles with practical all-day cooling and enhanced wearability: (a) measurement of radiative cooling in a roof test facility under sunlight exposure; (b) 24 h temperature in Zhenjiang, China, on a sunny day; (c) real-time temperature profiles of skin simulators covered with different textile materials; (d) water vapor transmission rates over time; (e) systematic characterisation of breathability performance; and (f) quantitative analysis of liquid water transport differences. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [51]. Copyright 2023 Elsevier).
Cleantechnol 07 00095 g009
Figure 10. Contact angle measurements of chitosan–SiO2 layers: (a) 0.2%: 0.4% concentration; (b) 0.4%: 0.6%; (c) 0.6%: 0.8%; (d) 0.8%: 1%; (e) 1× immersion; (f) 2×; (g) 3×; (h) 4×. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [81]. Copyright 2024 Elsevier).
Figure 10. Contact angle measurements of chitosan–SiO2 layers: (a) 0.2%: 0.4% concentration; (b) 0.4%: 0.6%; (c) 0.6%: 0.8%; (d) 0.8%: 1%; (e) 1× immersion; (f) 2×; (g) 3×; (h) 4×. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [81]. Copyright 2024 Elsevier).
Cleantechnol 07 00095 g010
Figure 11. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images analysis of (a) neat chitosan powder; (b) chitosan powder after adsorption (loaded); (c) loaded chitosan powder dispersed in polyacrylamide gel; (d) neat chitosan bead; (e) chitosan bead after adsorption (loaded). (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [136]. Copyright 2023 Nature).
Figure 11. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images analysis of (a) neat chitosan powder; (b) chitosan powder after adsorption (loaded); (c) loaded chitosan powder dispersed in polyacrylamide gel; (d) neat chitosan bead; (e) chitosan bead after adsorption (loaded). (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [136]. Copyright 2023 Nature).
Cleantechnol 07 00095 g011
Figure 12. Comparative DB78 dye removal: (a) chitosan powder adsorbent; (b) chitosan micro-bead adsorbent; (c) synthetic wastewater control. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [136]. Copyright 2023 Nature).
Figure 12. Comparative DB78 dye removal: (a) chitosan powder adsorbent; (b) chitosan micro-bead adsorbent; (c) synthetic wastewater control. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [136]. Copyright 2023 Nature).
Cleantechnol 07 00095 g012
Table 1. Effect of finishing agent concentration on radical scavenging activity of treated fabrics. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [107]. Copyright 2024 Elsevier).
Table 1. Effect of finishing agent concentration on radical scavenging activity of treated fabrics. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [107]. Copyright 2024 Elsevier).
ConcentrationRSA% of Sericin-Treated FabricRSA% of Chitosan-Treated FabricRSA% of Chitosan–Sericin-Treated Fabric
2 mg/mL29.36 ± 0.6325.04 ± 0.8527.10 ± 0.60
4 mg/mL35.02 ± 0.8329.24 ± 0.5932.43 ± 0.58
6 mg/mL42.33 ± 0.5133.42 ± 0.5138.44 ± 0.60
8 mg/mL48.12 ± 0.4438.14 ± 0.3142.13 ± 0.78
10 mg/mL53.04 ± 0.2342.35 ± 0.4047.44 ± 0.5
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, A.; Qi, B.; Ku, L. Chitosan-Based Composites for Sustainable Textile Production: Applications Across the Lifecycle. Clean Technol. 2025, 7, 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol7040095

AMA Style

Liu A, Qi B, Ku L. Chitosan-Based Composites for Sustainable Textile Production: Applications Across the Lifecycle. Clean Technologies. 2025; 7(4):95. https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol7040095

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, An, Buer Qi, and Lisbeth Ku. 2025. "Chitosan-Based Composites for Sustainable Textile Production: Applications Across the Lifecycle" Clean Technologies 7, no. 4: 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol7040095

APA Style

Liu, A., Qi, B., & Ku, L. (2025). Chitosan-Based Composites for Sustainable Textile Production: Applications Across the Lifecycle. Clean Technologies, 7(4), 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol7040095

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop