Genomic Screening of Nitrogen-Fixing Nostocales Cyanobacteria Reveals Predicted Traits for Soil Fertility and Plant Growth Promotion
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Cyanobacterial Strains and Culture Conditions
2.2. DNA Extraction, Sequencing, and Quality Control
2.3. Genome Assembly, Quality Assessment, and Decontamination
2.4. Phylogenomic Analysis
2.5. Functional Annotation
2.6. In Silico Toxomics and Biosafety Framework
2.7. Prediction of Plant Growth-Promoting Genes and Visualization (PLaBAse)
2.8. Analysis of Defensive and Mobile Genetic Elements
2.9. Rhizosphere Colonization and Biosynthetic Potential
2.10. Data Availability
3. Results
3.1. Morphological Characteristics of the Studied Strains
3.2. Genome Assembly and Quality Assessment
3.3. Taxonomic Identification and Phylogenomic Analysis
3.4. Functional Annotation and Metabolic Potential
3.4.1. Functional Profile Based on KEGG Orthology
- Carbohydrate metabolism: 293–417 genes, reflecting the photoautotrophic lifestyle and capacity for polysaccharide production.
- Energy metabolism: 281–337 genes, including photosynthesis and oxidative phosphorylation pathways.
- Amino acid metabolism: 236–341 genes, indicating robust biosynthetic capabilities.
- Metabolism of cofactors and vitamins: 244–327 genes, including pathways for B-vitamin synthesis.
- Biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites: 61–120 genes, suggesting diverse bioactive compound production.
3.4.2. Functional Profile Based on SEED Subsystems
- Amino acids and derivatives: 139–160 genes across all strains, with VKM Al-168 showing the highest representation (160 genes).
- Carbohydrates: 132–150 genes, confirming robust carbon metabolism capacity.
- Stress response: 41–46 genes, indicating well-developed adaptation mechanisms to environmental fluctuations.
- Nitrogen metabolism: 7–10 genes, including the complete nif gene cluster for nitrogen fixation.
- Phosphorus metabolism: 17–22 genes, with complete phosphate mobilization systems.
- Secondary metabolism: 8–16 genes, with higher representation in VKM Al-37 and VKM Al-158.
3.5. In Silico Toxomics and Ecological Profiling
3.6. Plant Growth-Promoting Potential
3.6.1. Nostoc Commune VKM Al-35
3.6.2. Nostoc Punctiforme VKM Al-37
3.6.3. Anabaena Pirinica VKM Al-153
3.6.4. Hassallia Pseudoramosissima VKM Al-158
3.6.5. Nostoc Minutum VKM Al-168
3.7. Defensive and Mobile Genetic Elements
3.7.1. Antibiotic Resistance Screening and Biosafety Assessment
3.7.2. CRISPR-Cas Systems
3.7.3. Mobile Genetic Elements
3.8. Secondary Metabolites and Rhizosphere Colonization Factors
3.8.1. Biosynthetic Gene Clusters (antiSMASH)
3.8.2. Rhizosphere Competence and Colonization Clusters (RhizoSMASH)
4. Discussion
4.1. Genomic Bioprospecting as a Rational Strategy for Strain Selection
4.2. Taxonomic Diversity, Phylogenomic Discordance, and Ecological Adaptation
4.3. Metabolic Strategies: Universal Support Versus Specialized Stimulation
4.4. Defensive and Competitive Potential: CRISPR-Cas, MGEs, and Secondary Metabolomes
4.5. Rhizosphere Competence and Colonization Strategies
4.6. Implications for Soil Health and Sustainable Agriculture
4.7. Comparison with Previously Reported Cyanobacterial Biostimulants
4.8. Limitations of the Study and Future Research Directions
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| ANI | Average Nucleotide Identity |
| antiSMASH | antibiotics & Secondary Metabolite Analysis Shell |
| ARG | Antimicrobial Resistance Gene |
| BGC | Biosynthetic Gene Cluster |
| BNF | Biological Nitrogen Fixation |
| CARD | Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database |
| CAZyme | Carbohydrate-Active Enzyme |
| CDPS | Cyclodipeptide Synthase |
| CDS | Coding DNA Sequence |
| CRISPR | Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats |
| CSP | Cold Shock Protein |
| dDDH | digital DNA–DNA Hybridization |
| DNA | Deoxyribonucleic Acid |
| EPS | Exopolysaccharide(s) |
| FAO | Food and Agriculture Organization |
| GBDP | Genome BLAST Distance Phylogeny |
| GC–MS | Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry |
| GGDC | Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator |
| HGT | Horizontal Gene Transfer |
| HMM | Hidden Markov Model |
| HSP | Heat Shock Protein |
| IAA | Indole-3-Acetic Acid |
| KEGG | Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes |
| KO | KEGG Ortholog |
| LC–MS/MS | Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry |
| MAA | Mycosporine-like Amino Acid |
| MGEs | Mobile Genetic Elements |
| MIBiG | Minimum Information about a Biosynthetic Gene Cluster |
| NCBI | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
| NRPS | Non-Ribosomal Peptide Synthetase |
| NUE | Nitrogen Use Efficiency |
| ORF | Open Reading Frame |
| PCR | Polymerase Chain Reaction |
| PGP | Plant Growth-Promoting |
| PGPB | Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria |
| PGPT | Plant Growth-Promoting Trait |
| PKS | Polyketide Synthase |
| PLaBAse | Plant-Bacteria Association pipeline |
| PQQ | Pyrroloquinoline Quinone |
| RAPD | Random Amplification of Polymorphic DNA |
| RAST | Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology |
| rCGC | Rhizosphere-Competent Metabolic Gene Cluster |
| RGI | Resistance Gene Identifier |
| RhizoSMASH | Rhizosphere-competent metabolic gene cluster prediction tool |
| RiPP | Ribosomally synthesized and Post-translationally modified Peptide |
| RNA | Ribonucleic Acid |
| ROS | Reactive Oxygen Species |
| RRE | Recognition Element-containing |
| SEED | SEED subsystems database |
| SynCom | Synthetic Community |
| T1PKS | Type I Polyketide Synthase |
| T3PKS | Type III Polyketide Synthase |
| T4SS | Type IV Secretion System |
| T6SS | Type VI Secretion System |
| TYGS | Type (Strain) Genome Server |
| VKM | All-Russian Collection of Microorganisms |
| VOC | Volatile Organic Compound |
| WGS | Whole-Genome Sequencing |
References
- Singh, J.S.; Kumar, A.; Rai, A.N.; Singh, D.P. Cyanobacteria: A precious bio-resource in agriculture, ecosystem, and environmental sustainability. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Hyder, S.; Khan, A.R.; Malik, S.; Gondal, A.S.; Ahmed, R.; Campos-Avelar, I.; de los Santos Villalobos, S. Phytomicrobiomes as biocontrol agents against soil-borne plant diseases. In Microbiome Research in Plants and Soil: Phytomicrobiome and Stress Regulation; Ilyas, N., Sayyed, R., Khan, A., Mix, K.D., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2025; pp. 517–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Herrero, J.; Ramírez-Santos, A.; Díaz-Santos, E.; Torres-Cortés, G. Biofertilizers for Enhanced Nitrogen Use Efficiency: Mechanisms, Innovations, and Challenges. Nitrogen 2025, 6, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Adeleke, B.S.; Babalola, O.O. The endosphere microbial communities, a great promise in agriculture. Int. Microbiol. 2021, 24, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Ramzan, F.; Vassiliou, L.; Tsaltas, D. Unveiling the diversity and mechanisms of plant growth-promoting bacteria in orchids: A comprehensive review. Front. Microbiol. 2026, 17, 1697953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Whitton, B.A.; Potts, M. (Eds.) Ecology of Cyanobacteria II: Their Diversity in Space and Time; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 1–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pathak, J.; Singh, P.R.; Sinha, R.P.; Rastogi, R.P. Evolution and Distribution of Cyanobacteria. In Ecophysiology and Biochemistry of Cyanobacteria; Rastogi, R.P., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Saleem, A.; Anwar, S.; Saud, S.; Alharbi, S.A. Cyanobacteria diversity and ecological roles: Insights into cyanobacterial adaptations and environmental implications. J. Umm Al-Qura Univ. Appl. Sci. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mishra, A.; Rajput, S.; Gupta, P.S.; Goyal, V.; Singh, S.; Sharma, S.; Shukla, S.; Singh, A.; Shukla, K.; Varma, A. Role of Cyanobacteria in Rhizospheric Nitrogen Fixation. In Soil Nitrogen Ecology; Cruz, C., Vishwakarma, K., Choudhary, D.K., Varma, A., Eds.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 497–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sobol, M.S.; Klos, A.S.; Ané, C.; McMahon, K.D.; Kaçar, B. Ecological constraints and evolutionary trade-offs shape nitrogen fixation across habitats. ISME Commun. 2026, 6, ycag007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Dietrich, M.; Panhölzl, C.; Angel, R.; Giguere, A.T.; Randi, D.; Hausmann, B.; Herbold, C.W.; Potsch, E.M.; Schaumberger, A.; Eichorst, S.A. Plant roots affect free-living diazotroph communities in temperate grassland soils despite decades of fertilization. Commun. Biol. 2024, 7, 846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Sorochkina, K.; Martens-Habbena, W.; Reardon, C.L.; Inglett, P.W.; Strauss, S.L. Nitrogen-fixing bacterial communities differ between perennial agroecosystem crops. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2024, 100, fiae064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Nivedha, R.M.; Prasanna, R. Phytochemical diversity of the metabolite profiles relates to the biostimulatory potential of agriculturally beneficial cyanobacteria. Arch. Microbiol. 2025, 207, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Nowruzi, B.; Lorenzi, A.S. Molecular phylogeny of two Aliinostoc isolates from a paddy field. Plant Syst. Evol. 2023, 309, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Rojas-Villalta, D.; Gómez-Espinoza, O.; Murillo-Vega, F.; Villalta-Romero, F.; Guerrero, M.; Guillen-Watson, R.; Nunez-Montero, K. Insights into Co-Cultivation of Photosynthetic Microorganisms for Novel Molecule Discovery and Enhanced Production of Specialized Metabolites. Fermentation 2023, 9, 941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Temraleeva, A.D.; Sinetova, M.A.; Gabrielyan, D.A.; Didovich, S.V.; Kamenev, A.O. Cyanobacteria for Plant Growth Promotion: From Taxon and Metabolite Diversity to Large-Scale Cultivation and Agricultural Applications. Biol. Biotechnol. 2025, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pandey, B.; Sharma, A.; Sundaram, S.; Nath, A. Creating a designer cyanobacterial ecosystem for the sustainable production of biomass rich in sun-protecting compounds: Mycosporine-like amino acids and scytonemin. Arch. Microbiol. 2025, 207, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Chen, M.Y.; Teng, W.K.; Zhao, L.; Hu, C.X.; Zhou, Y.K.; Han, B.P.; Song, L.R.; Shu, W.S. Comparative genomics reveals insights into cyanobacterial evolution and habitat adaptation. ISME J. 2021, 15, 211–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Stanier, R.Y.; Kunisawa, R.; Mandel, M.; Cohen-Bazire, G. Purification and properties of unicellular blue-green algae (order Chroococcales). Bacteriol. Rev. 1971, 35, 171–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wu, Y.W.; Simmons, B.A.; Singer, S.W. MaxBin 2.0: An automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 605–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Wood, D.E.; Lu, J.; Langmead, B. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Chklovski, A.; Parks, D.H.; Woodcroft, B.J.; Tyson, G.W. CheckM2: A rapid, scalable and accurate tool for assessing microbial genome quality using machine learning. Nat. Methods 2023, 20, 1203–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Gurevich, A.; Saveliev, V.; Vyahhi, N.; Tesler, G. QUAST: Quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 1072–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Jain, C.; Rodriguez-R, L.M.; Phillippy, A.M.; Konstantidis, K.T.; Aluru, S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Göker, M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Sardà Carbasse, J.; Peinado-Olarte, R.L.; Göker, M. TYGS and LPSN: A database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, D801–D807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Lefort, V.; Desper, R.; Gascuel, O. FastME 2.0: A comprehensive, accurate, and fast distance-based phylogeny inference program. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015, 32, 2798–2800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Hahnke, R.L.; Petersen, J.; Scheuner, C.; Michael, V.; Fiebig, A.; Rohde, C.; Kyripides, N.C.; Klenk, H.P.; Göker, M. Complete genome sequence of DSM 30083T, the type strain (U5/41T) of Escherichia coli, and a proposal for delineating subspecies in microbial taxonomy. Stand. Genom. Sci. 2014, 9, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2068–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Aramaki, T.; Blanc-Mathieu, R.; Endo, H.; Ohkubo, K.; Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S.; Ogata, H. KofamKOALA: KEGG Ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics 2020, 36, 2251–2252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kanehisa, M.; Furumichi, M.; Sato, Y.; Kawashima, M.; Ishiguro-Watanabe, M. KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D587–D592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Aziz, R.K.; Bartels, D.; Best, A.A.; DeJongh, M.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Formsma, K.; Gerdes, S.; Glass, E.M.; Kubal, M.; et al. The RAST Server: Rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Brettin, T.; Davis, J.J.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Gerdes, S.; Olsen, G.J.; Olson, R.; Overbeek, R.; Parrello, B.; Pusch, G.D.; et al. RASTtk: A modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Overbeek, R.; Olson, R.; Pusch, G.D.; Olson, J.D.; Meyer, F.; Aziz, R.K. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D206–D214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Patz, S.; Gautam, A.; Becker, M.; Ruppel, S.; Rodríguez-Palenzuela, P.; Huson, D.H. PLaBAse: A comprehensive web resource for analyzing the plant growth-promoting potential of plant-associated bacteria. bioRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Grant, J.R.; Enns, E.; Marinier, E.; Mandal, A.; Herman, E.K.; Chen, C.Y.; Graham, M.; Van Domselaar, G.; Stothard, P. Proksee: In-depth characterization and visualization of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, W484–W492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Alcock, B.P.; Raphenya, A.R.; Lau, T.T.Y.; Tsang, K.K.; Bouchard, M.; Edalatmand, A.; Huynh, W.; Nguyen, A.V.; Cheng, A.A.; Liu, S.; et al. CARD 2023: Expanded curation, support for machine learning, and resistome prediction at the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D690–D699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Couvin, D.; Bernheim, A.; Toffano-Nioche, C.; Touchon, M.; Michalik, J.; Néron, B.; Rocha, E.P.C.; Vergnaud, G.; Gautheret, D.; Pourcel, C. CRISPRCasFinder, an update of CRISPRFinder, includes a portable version, enhanced performance and integrates search for Cas proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, W246–W251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Brown, C.L.; Mullet, J.; Hindi, F.; Stoll, J.E.; Gupta, S.; Bendall, M.L.; Crabb, J.H.; Emerson, J.B.; Castro-Nallar, E.; Stepanauskas, R.; et al. mobileOG-db: A Manually Curated Database of Protein Families Mediating the Life Cycle of Bacterial Mobile Genetic Elements. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 88, e00991-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Li, Y.; Sun, M.; Raaijmakers, J.M.; Mommer, L.; Zhang, F.; Song, C.; Medema, M.H. Predicting rhizosphere-competence-related catabolic gene clusters in plant-associated bacteria with rhizoSMASH. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 8400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Blin, K.; Shaw, S.; Vader, L.; Szenei, J.; Reitz, Z.L.; Augustijn, H.E.; Cediel-Becerra, J.D.D.; de Crécy-Lagard, V.; Koetsier, R.A.; Williams, S.E. antiSMASH 8.0: Extended gene cluster detection capabilities and analyses of chemistry, enzymology, and regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025, 53, W32–W38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Bowers, R.M.; Kyrpides, N.C.; Stepanauskas, R.; Harmon-Smith, M.; Doud, D.; Reddy, T.B.K.; Schulz, F.; Jarett, J.; Rivers, A.R.; Eloe-Fadrosh, E.A.; et al. Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017, 35, 725–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Vanlalveni, C.; Lalfakzuala, R. Isolation and Genetic Diversity Studies of Nitrogen-Fixing Cyanobacteria from Wetland Paddy Field of Mizoram, India. Geomicrobiol. J. 2021, 38, 946–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Onyeka, S.C.; Ogbonna, J.C.; Nwoba, E.G. A green microbe for a sustainable future: The versatile applications of Nostoc commune. Sustain. Microbiol. 2025, 2, qvaf025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Renu; Gupta, S.; Sharma, T.R. Recent Advances in Methods and Techniques of Meta-omics for Crop Improvement. In Meta-Omics in Crop Improvement, Volume I: Methods and Approaches; Renu, G.S., Sharma, T.R., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2025; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Komárek, J.; Kaštovský, J.; Mareš, J.; Johansen, J.R. Taxonomic classification of cyanoprokaryotes (cyanobacterial genera) 2014, using a polyphasic approach. Preslia 2014, 86, 295–335. [Google Scholar]
- Pecundo, M.H.; Cai, F.; Chang, A.C.G.; Ren, H.; Li, N.; Li, R.; Chen, T. Polyphasic approach identifies two new species of Desmonostoc (Nostocales, Cyanobacteria) in the coralloid roots of Cycas fairylakea (Cycadales). Phycologia 2021, 60, 653–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Strunecký, O.; Ivanova, A.P.; Mareš, J. An updated classification of cyanobacterial orders and families based on phylogenomic and polyphasic analysis. J. Phycol. 2023, 59, 12–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Bustos-Diaz, E.D.; Cruz-Perez, A.; Garfias-Gallegos, D.; D’Agostino, P.M.; Gehringer, M.M.; Cibrian-Jaramillo, A.; Barona-Gomez, F. Phylometagenomics of cycad coralloid roots reveals shared symbiotic signals. Microb. Genom. 2024, 10, 001207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- D’Costa, V.M.; King, C.E.; Kalan, L.; Morar, M.; Sung, W.W.L.; Schwarz, C.; Froese, D.; Zazula, G.; Calmels, F.; Debruyne, R.; et al. Antibiotic Resistance Is Ancient. Nature 2011, 477, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Perry, J.A.; Waglechner, N.; Wright, G.D. The Prehistory of Antibiotic Resistance. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2016, 6, a025197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Shishido, T.K.; Humisto, A.; Jokela, J.; Liu, L.; Wahlsten, M.; Tamrakar, A.; Fewer, D.P.; Permi, P.; Andreote, A.P.D.; Fiore, M.F.; et al. Antifungal Compounds from Cyanobacteria. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 2124–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Álvarez, C.; Navarro, J.A.; Molina-Heredia, F.P.; Mariscal, V. Endophytic Colonization of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) by the Symbiotic Strain Nostoc punctiforme PCC 73102. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2020, 33, 1040–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Fazal, A.; Yang, M.; Wen, Z.; Ali, F.; Ren, R.; Hao, C.; Chen, X.; Fu, J.; Wang, X.; Jie, W.; et al. Differential microbial assemblages associated with shikonin-producing Borage species in two distinct soil types. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 10788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Kaur, S.; Egidi, E.; Qiu, Z.; Macdonald, C.A.; Verma, J.P.; Trivedi, P.; Wang, J.; Liu, H.; Singh, B.K. Synthetic community improves crop performance and alters rhizosphere microbial communities. J. Sustain. Agric. Environ. 2022, 1, 118–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zavahir, J.S.; Wijepala, P.C.; Seneviratne, G. Role of Microbial Communities in Plant–Microbe Interactions, Metabolic Cooperation, and Self-Sufficiency Leading to Sustainable Agriculture. In Role of Microbial Communities for Sustainability; Seneviratne, G., Zavahir, J.S., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 1–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Righini, H.; Francioso, O.; Martel Quintana, A.; Roberti, R. Cyanobacteria: A Natural Source for Controlling Agricultural Plant Diseases Caused by Fungi and Oomycetes and Improving Plant Growth. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Prasanna, R.; Sharma, E.; Sharma, P.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, R.; Gupta, V.; Pal, R.K.; Shivay, Y.S.; Nain, L. Soil fertility and establishment potential of inoculated cyanobacteria in rice crop grown under non-flooded conditions. Paddy Water Environ. 2013, 11, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Iniesta-Pallarés, M.; Álvarez, C.; Gordillo-Cantón, F.M.; Ramírez-Moncayo, C.; Alves-Martínez, P.; Molina-Heredia, F.P.; Mariscal, V. Sustaining Rice Production through Biofertilization with N2-Fixing Cyanobacteria. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hamad, H.S.; Bleih, E.M.; Gewaily, E.E.; Abou Elataa, A.E.; El Sherbiny, H.A.; Abdelhameid, N.M.; Rehan, M. Cyanobacteria Application Ameliorates Floral Traits and Outcrossing Rate in Diverse Rice Cytoplasmic Male Sterile Lines. Plants 2022, 11, 3411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Nisha, R.; Kaushik, A.; Kaushik, C.P. Effect of indigenous cyanobacterial application on structural stability and productivity of an organically poor semi-arid soil. Geoderma 2007, 138, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zahra, Z.; Choo, D.H.; Lee, H.; Parveen, A. Cyanobacteria: Review of Current Potentials and Applications. Environments 2020, 7, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Uniyal, S.; Singh, P.; Singh, R.K.; Tiwari, S.P. Effects of Nostoc sp. inoculation on the yield and quality of a medicinal plant, Allium sativum. J. Appl. Phycol. 2024, 36, 3287–3300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ghahari, S.; Nematzadeh, G.A.; Pakdin, A.; Ardakani, M.R. Antibacterial and Biopriming Effects of Nostocales Cyanobacteria on Tomato Plants Infected with Bacterial Spot Disease. Curr. Microbiol. 2025, 82, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Lu, Q.T.; Li, A.L.; Liu, Y.Z.; Hu, G.; Hu, C.; Xu, C.H.; Zhong, C.F.; Zhang, Z.H. Effect of short-term nitrogen addition on the soil nitrogen-fixing microbial community in a karst region. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2025, 23, 1853–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]











| Strain | Genome Size (Mbp) | Number of Contigs | N50 (kbp) | Completeness (CheckM2, %) | Contamination (CheckM2, %) | GC Content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VKM Al-35 | 8.79 | 175 | 122.6 | 98.29 | 4.5 | 42 |
| VKM Al-37 | 8.37 | 224 | 92.1 | 99.99 | 0.5 | 42 |
| VKM Al-153 | 6.32 | 83 | 126.9 | 99.95 | 0.5 | 40 |
| VKM Al-158 | 7.41 | 325 | 46.9 | 99.86 | 0.4 | 42 |
| VKM Al-168 | 9.36 | 311 | 77.9 | 100 | 0.6 | 42 |
| Strain | Closest Type Strain (TYGS) | dDDH (d4, %) | ANI (%) | G+C Diff. (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VKM Al-35 | Nostoc sp. 210A | 51.1 | 93.00 | 0.04 |
| VKM Al-37 | Nostoc desertorum CM1-VF14 | 42.6 | 90.35 | 0.42 |
| VKM Al-153 | Anabaena cylindrica PCC 7122 | 55.4 | 93.65 | 0.04 |
| VKM Al-158 | Nostoc desertorum CM1-VF14 | 58.3 | 94.47 | 0.01 |
| VKM Al-168 | Nostoc punctiforme NIES-2108 | 41.3 | 90.22 | 0.00 |
| Strain | Total CDS | Predicted Proteins | Proteins with Functional Assignment by KofamScan/KEGG * | Genes with EC Numbers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VKM Al-35 | 7680 | 7583 | 2995 | 1367 |
| VKM Al-37 | 7361 | 7268 | 2950 | 1345 |
| VKM Al-153 | 5701 | 5701 | 5650 | 2337 |
| VKM Al-158 | 6613 | 6613 | 6544 | 2614 |
| VKM Al-168 | 8157 | 8157 | 8063 | 3011 |
| KEGG Category | VKM Al-35 | VKM Al-37 | VKM Al-153 | VKM Al-158 | VKM Al-168 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell growth and death | 96 | 84 | 64 | 88 | 99 |
| Cellular community—prokaryotes | 220 | 215 | 150 | 197 | 218 |
| Environmental Information Processing | |||||
| Membrane transport | 211 | 199 | 147 | 197 | 222 |
| Signal transduction | 345 | 340 | 214 | 276 | 356 |
| Metabolism | |||||
| Amino acid metabolism | 333 | 333 | 246 | 310 | 336 |
| Biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites | 120 | 110 | 61 | 105 | 115 |
| Carbohydrate metabolism | 400 | 397 | 311 | 361 | 387 |
| Energy metabolism | 317 | 310 | 287 | 281 | 305 |
| Metabolism of cofactors and vitamins | 307 | 326 | 259 | 296 | 315 |
| Metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides | 110 | 104 | 71 | 92 | 113 |
| Unclassified | |||||
| Unidentified genes | 2739 | 2580 | 1835 | 2474 | 2912 |
| SEED Subsystem Category | VKM Al-35 | VKM Al-37 | VKM Al-153 | VKM Al-158 | VKM Al-168 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amino acids and derivatives | 154 | 143 | 139 | 140 | 160 |
| Carbohydrates | 150 | 142 | 132 | 146 | 146 |
| Cell wall and capsule | 25 | 25 | 21 | 21 | 24 |
| Cofactors, vitamins, prosthetic groups | 144 | 145 | 144 | 136 | 154 |
| DNA metabolism | 49 | 49 | 50 | 50 | 49 |
| Fatty acids, lipids, isoprenoids | 29 | 31 | 43 | 54 | 31 |
| Membrane transport | 36 | 37 | 24 | 32 | 32 |
| Nitrogen metabolism | 8 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Phosphorus metabolism | 21 | 17 | 21 | 21 | 17 |
| Respiration | 50 | 50 | 50 | 46 | 46 |
| Stress response | 45 | 42 | 41 | 41 | 43 |
| Secondary metabolism | 12 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 12 |
| Unidentified genes | 5735 | 5422 | 4944 | 6819 | 8409 |
| Strain | Resistance Gene | Product | Resistance Mechanism | Identity (%) | Coverage (%) | ARO Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VKM Al-35 | adeF (3 copies) | RND-type efflux pump | antibiotic efflux | 42.6–43.2 | 97–100 | 3000777 |
| VKM Al-37 | adeF (3 copies) | RND efflux pump | efflux | 42.6–44.5 | 97–100 | 3000777 |
| FosA8 | fosfomycin thiol transferase | inactivation | 43.4 | 100 | 3007371 | |
| RSC1-1 | class A beta-lactamase | inactivation | 65.6 | 100 | 3009041 | |
| VKM Al-153 | adeF | RND-type efflux pump | antibiotic efflux | 43.3 | 99–100 | 3000777 |
| FosA8 | fosfomycin thiol transferase | antibiotic inactivation | 43.4 | 100 | 3007371 | |
| VKM Al-158 | adeF | RND-type efflux pump | antibiotic efflux | 42.8 | 99–100 | 3000777 |
| FosA8 | fosfomycin thiol transferase | antibiotic inactivation | 51.1 | 100 | 3007371 | |
| VKM Al-168 | adeF (2 copies) | RND-type efflux pump | antibiotic efflux | 41.8–43.4 | 99–100 | 3000777 |
| Strain | Total CRISPR Arrays | CRISPR Arrays (Level 1) | Cas Types Detected |
|---|---|---|---|
| VKM Al-35 | 44 | 34 | I-A, I-D |
| VKM Al-37 | 38 | 32 | I-D |
| VKM Al-153 | 27 | 19 | I-A, I-D, III-A, III-U |
| VKM Al-158 | 28 | 22 | I-D |
| VKM Al-168 | 47 | 29 | I-A, I-D |
| Strain | Total | Int/Exc | Stab/Def | Phage | Rep/Rec | Transfer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VKM Al-35 | 279 | 174 | 48 | 23 | 18 | 10 |
| VKM Al-37 | 274 | 168 | 47 | 24 | 19 | 10 |
| VKM Al-153 | 146 | 62 | 39 | 19 | 13 | 10 |
| VKM Al-158 | 261 | 122 | 58 | 31 | 31 | 19 |
| VKM Al-168 | 304 | 151 | 68 | 35 | 34 | 16 |
| Strain | Total BGCs | Common BGC Types | Unique/Rare BGCs | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NRPS | T1PKS | Terpenes | Lanthi (V/II) | hglE-KS/T1PKS | Phosphonates | |||
| VKM Al-35 | 17 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 2/1 | 1 | 1 | NRPS-like (1), mycosporines (1), RRE-containing (1), spliceotides (1), NRP-metallophores (1) |
| VKM Al-37 | 22 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 2/3 | 1 | 1 | Microviridins (1), azole-containing RiPP (1), RiPP-like (1), mycosporines (1), NRPS-like (1) |
| VKM Al-153 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2/0 | 2 | 0 | CDPS (1), azole-containing RiPP (1), RRE-containing (1), resorcinol + hglE-KS (1) |
| VKM Al-158 | 20 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1/1 | 1 | 1 | Darobactin/triceptides (1), betalactones (1), microviridins (1), mycosporines (1), spliceotides + RRE-containing (1) |
| VKM Al-168 | 23 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 2/2 | 1 | 1 | T3PKS (1), microviridins (3), hybrid NRPS + microviridin (1), mycosporines (1), NRPS-like (1) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Temraleeva, A.; Arefieva, N.; Bukin, Y.; Didovich, S.; Kulikovskiy, M. Genomic Screening of Nitrogen-Fixing Nostocales Cyanobacteria Reveals Predicted Traits for Soil Fertility and Plant Growth Promotion. Soil Syst. 2026, 10, 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems10070081
Temraleeva A, Arefieva N, Bukin Y, Didovich S, Kulikovskiy M. Genomic Screening of Nitrogen-Fixing Nostocales Cyanobacteria Reveals Predicted Traits for Soil Fertility and Plant Growth Promotion. Soil Systems. 2026; 10(7):81. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems10070081
Chicago/Turabian StyleTemraleeva, Anna, Nadezhda Arefieva, Yury Bukin, Svetlana Didovich, and Maxim Kulikovskiy. 2026. "Genomic Screening of Nitrogen-Fixing Nostocales Cyanobacteria Reveals Predicted Traits for Soil Fertility and Plant Growth Promotion" Soil Systems 10, no. 7: 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems10070081
APA StyleTemraleeva, A., Arefieva, N., Bukin, Y., Didovich, S., & Kulikovskiy, M. (2026). Genomic Screening of Nitrogen-Fixing Nostocales Cyanobacteria Reveals Predicted Traits for Soil Fertility and Plant Growth Promotion. Soil Systems, 10(7), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems10070081

