Previous Article in Journal
Fire Suppression Performance of a Water Mist System Using Ultrasonic Waves
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Social–Ecological Dimensions of Wildfire Risk in the Community Forests of Northern Thailand: Leadership Perception, Participation, and Surface Fuel Conditions

by
Doria Gallia Procuna Ramos
1,*,
Kobsak Wanthongchai
1 and
Rachanee Pothitan
2
1
Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
2
Department of Forest Management, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fire 2026, 9(6), 220; https://doi.org/10.3390/fire9060220
Submission received: 11 March 2026 / Revised: 9 May 2026 / Accepted: 19 May 2026 / Published: 26 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Fire Social Science)

Abstract

Community-Based Fire Management (CBFiM) integrates local governance and ecological stewardship, yet the social drivers shaping its effectiveness remain poorly understood. This study examines the relationships among leadership perception, community participation, and surface fuel conditions in two community forests in Lampang Province, northern Thailand: Ban Pong and Ban Rong Ta. Forest floor fuel data were collected through destructive fuel sampling during the 2025 dry season, and social data were gathered through structured questionnaires measuring leadership perception using the Crew Member Perceived Leadership Scale and participation across seven fire management activities. Ban Rong Ta showed lower fuel loads but higher fire occurrence (nine fire detections recorded in 9 of 10 study years), lower leadership perception across all dimensions, and reduced participation in activities. The brigade–community participation gap reflects patterns documented across Southeast Asian community forestry programs, pointing to a structural challenge in fire governance. These findings suggest that awareness and informational participation alone do not reduce wildfire risk, and that integrating social and ecological indicators is essential for designing effective community-based fire governance systems.
Keywords: community-based fire management; community forestry; community participation; northern Thailand community-based fire management; community forestry; community participation; northern Thailand

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Procuna Ramos, D.G.; Wanthongchai, K.; Pothitan, R. Social–Ecological Dimensions of Wildfire Risk in the Community Forests of Northern Thailand: Leadership Perception, Participation, and Surface Fuel Conditions. Fire 2026, 9, 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire9060220

AMA Style

Procuna Ramos DG, Wanthongchai K, Pothitan R. Social–Ecological Dimensions of Wildfire Risk in the Community Forests of Northern Thailand: Leadership Perception, Participation, and Surface Fuel Conditions. Fire. 2026; 9(6):220. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire9060220

Chicago/Turabian Style

Procuna Ramos, Doria Gallia, Kobsak Wanthongchai, and Rachanee Pothitan. 2026. "Social–Ecological Dimensions of Wildfire Risk in the Community Forests of Northern Thailand: Leadership Perception, Participation, and Surface Fuel Conditions" Fire 9, no. 6: 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire9060220

APA Style

Procuna Ramos, D. G., Wanthongchai, K., & Pothitan, R. (2026). Social–Ecological Dimensions of Wildfire Risk in the Community Forests of Northern Thailand: Leadership Perception, Participation, and Surface Fuel Conditions. Fire, 9(6), 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire9060220

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop