Next Article in Journal
Easy-To-Interpret Procedure to Analyze Fire Seasonality and the Influence of Land Use in Fire Occurrence: A Case Study in Central Italy
Next Article in Special Issue
In the Line of Fire: Consequences of Human-Ignited Wildfires to Homes in the U.S. (1992–2015)
Previous Article in Journal
Prescribed Burns in California: A Historical Case Study of the Integration of Scientific Research and Policy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrating Remote Sensing Methods and Fire Simulation Models to Estimate Fire Hazard in a South-East Mediterranean Protected Area
 
 
Article

Mitigating Source Water Risks with Improved Wildfire Containment

1
Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
2
Colorado Forest Restoration Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
3
Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 21 July 2020 / Revised: 17 August 2020 / Accepted: 20 August 2020 / Published: 21 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wildfire Hazard and Risk Assessment)
In many fire-prone watersheds, wildfire threatens surface drinking water sources with eroded contaminants. We evaluated the potential to mitigate the risk of degraded water quality by limiting fire sizes and contaminant loads with a containment network of manager-developed Potential fire Operational Delineations (PODs) using wildfire risk transmission methods to partition the effects of stochastically simulated wildfires to within and out of POD burning. We assessed water impacts with two metrics—total sediment load and frequency of exceeding turbidity limits for treatment—using a linked fire-erosion-sediment transport model. We found that improved fire containment could reduce wildfire risk to the water source by 13.0 to 55.3% depending on impact measure and post-fire rainfall. Containment based on PODs had greater potential in our study system to reduce total sediment load than it did to avoid degraded water quality. After containment, most turbidity exceedances originated from less than 20% of the PODs, suggesting strategic investments to further compartmentalize these areas could improve the effectiveness of the containment network. Similarly, risk transmission varied across the POD boundaries, indicating that efforts to increase containment probability with fuels reduction would have a disproportionate effect if prioritized along high transmission boundaries. View Full-Text
Keywords: water supply; erosion; wildfire containment; Potential fire Operational Delineations; Monte Carlo simulation; transmission risk water supply; erosion; wildfire containment; Potential fire Operational Delineations; Monte Carlo simulation; transmission risk
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Gannon, B.M.; Wei, Y.; Thompson, M.P. Mitigating Source Water Risks with Improved Wildfire Containment. Fire 2020, 3, 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire3030045

AMA Style

Gannon BM, Wei Y, Thompson MP. Mitigating Source Water Risks with Improved Wildfire Containment. Fire. 2020; 3(3):45. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire3030045

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gannon, Benjamin M., Yu Wei, and Matthew P. Thompson. 2020. "Mitigating Source Water Risks with Improved Wildfire Containment" Fire 3, no. 3: 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire3030045

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop