Next Article in Journal
Influence of Magnetic Field on Characteristics of Corona Discharge in Wire-Cylinder Electrodes Configuration
Next Article in Special Issue
Improving Seed Germination by Cold Atmospheric Plasma
Previous Article in Journal
On the Temperature and Plasma Distribution of an Inductively Driven Xe-I2-Discharge
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Cellular and Systemic Toxicity of Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma-Treated N-Acetylcysteine as Potential Antimicrobial Catheter Lock Solution
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Cylindrical Asymmetric Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge Actuators for Surface Decontamination and Mixing

1
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
2
Plasma Bionics LLC, Stillwater, OK 74074, USA
3
Institute for Biosecurity and Microbial Forensics National, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plasma 2021, 4(4), 755-763; https://doi.org/10.3390/plasma4040038
Submission received: 20 August 2021 / Revised: 29 October 2021 / Accepted: 16 November 2021 / Published: 25 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dielectric Barrier Discharges)

Abstract

:
Surface dielectric barrier discharge (SDBD) was used to evaluate cylindrical plasma actuators for inactivation of Salmonella enterica. A cylindrical SDBD configuration was evaluated to determine if the inherent induced body force could be leveraged to impel plasma species, such as reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS), as an apparatus to sterilize surfaces. The cylindrical structure is evaluated in this study to observe whether an increase in mixing is possible to efficiently distribute the plasma species, thereby improving bacterial inactivation efficiency. The increase in induced airflow of SDBD actuators with increased numbers of electrodes correlates with increased bacterial inactivation. These results suggest that improving the particle velocity, airflow mixing tendencies, and plasma volume for the same power inputs (same net power to the actuators) results in increased surface decontamination efficiency.

1. Introduction

Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP), or nonthermal plasma produced at atmospheric pressure, has demonstrated utility in both surface decontamination and airflow control within the past two decades [1,2,3,4,5]. Although CAP may be generated through several methods, surface dielectric barrier discharge (SDBD) is one of the simplest means. Asymmetric SDBD actuators generate plasma between two asymmetrically placed electrodes, where at least one electrode is covered by a dielectric material (embedded) [4,5]. The main advantages of SDBD over other plasma generation methods are the low power requirements, customizability (design and scale), no gas-flow requirement, and most importantly a localized airflow induction generated from a corona discharge.
An asymmetric design of SDBD imparts momentum into the gas adjacent to the exposed electrode as a result of the electric field coupling with the surrounding gas. The gas is entrained, and an effective “induced flow” is produced. In a gaseous medium including atmospheric air, CAP induces the generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, charged particles, and ultraviolet light. These are attributed as the major players contributing to bacterial inactivation observed in previous studies. Bacterial cellular damage results from high oxidative stress imposed on treated cells as a result of the action of the reactive species as well as electrostatic interactions of charged particles across the bacterial cell wall [2,6,7]. Ultimately, the cells die due to the constant barrage of accumulating reactive species, while being unable to keep up with lipid, protein, and DNA repair [8,9]. The induced flow of SDBD actuators functions as an effective delivery mechanism for the plasma-generated species to reach the contaminated surfaces [10]. By optimizing the geometric configurations of the plasma actuators, the SDBD impels the plasma-produced species toward a surface in a relatively power-efficient manner when compared to volumetric DBD (VDBD). Although VDBD has been utilized for bacterial inactivation, it requires a relatively higher power input, an addition of gas flow, and is highly limited in effective treatment area. VDBD lacks the natural means of species delivery that SDBD possesses, the induced fluid body flow. The true potential of SDBD is realized through the manipulation and utilization of the induced flow.
Several preliminary studies were performed to observe the efficacy of SDBD in different applications [10,11,12,13,14]. Various SDBD configurations were tested to improve induced flow strength and bacterial inactivation, including changes to physical parameters of electrodes and variations in dielectric materials. Geometrical changes in general considerably affect the total plasma volume output for a specific power input. For example, an increase in inter-electrode gap distance (i.e., the lateral distance between the exposed and embedded electrode) has been observed to increase induced flow strength, thereby increasing the effective treatment distance, but pushes the plasma into the “streamer regime”, consequently increasing energy waste through heat and light dissipation [12,15]. Additionally, arranging electrode pairs in opposite directions allows for plasma jet vectoring, opening up a certain level of control for reactive species distribution and vectoring toward a specific surface. Through ideal electrode separation and power input, the plasma may be optimized into the “uniform regime” producing increased plasma volume per unit area [15]. Thus, there are a plethora of methods to increase the efficacy of SDBD for bacterial inactivation, whether it is the distribution method or the optimization of plasma species generation.
In this study, a cylindrical configuration was observed to determine whether an increase in fluid mixing, consisting of redistribution and homogenization of plasma generated species in the bulk of the fluid (in this case air), was feasible and whether this mixing had any impact on the inactivation of bacteria. In addition to this, mixing characteristics in different configurations with varying numbers of electrodes was observed to determine whether a correlation exists between number of electrodes and mixing efficiency. Increasing the number of electrodes effectively increases the sources for plasma to form and thus momentum entrainment locations. Particle image velocimetry (PIV) was used to evaluate the degree to which the airflow in the cylinder-shaped actuators is entrained and redistributed by the induced flow due to the plasma, observed through characteristics such as vorticity. Comparisons were made between one, two, three, and six electrodes within similar-sized cylindrical-shaped actuators. All actuators were driven with the same amount of total power. By increasing the number of electrodes, the total power to each electrode was lower, but the combined power remained the same. Naturally, an increase in electrodes resulted in an increase in the plasma surface area but decreased plasma intensity per unit area. The efficacy of the actuators to decontaminate surfaces was evaluated by observing the average log reduction of bacterial cultures after plasma treatment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Actuator Material and Design

The cylindrical actuators used in this experiment were created using thin Teflon sheets, viewfoil made from polyester, and copper tape for the electrodes. The viewfoil was critical to this experiment to allow laser light to penetrate into the cylinder. Half the cylinder was viewfoil, while the other half was Teflon to act as the dielectric for the surface discharge actuator. The actuators were relatively circular with a diameter of around 1 inch. The actuators were constructed in an asymmetric configuration to allow for stronger induced flow. Each actuator configuration is displayed at the start of each electrode configuration PIV analysis, respectively. In the PIV experiment and the biological experiment, ambient air was used as the gas medium.
The electronics powering the actuator consisted of a minimax70 transformer (Information Unlimited, Amherst, NH, USA) running at 7 kV and 10 mA and a 4.8 V 2000 mAh battery pack (Tenergy, Fremont, CA, USA), as seen in Figure 1. The transformer utilizes a five-stage multiplier and can easily generate 30 kV at 0.5 mA with the output at 25–35 kHz. The power going into the actuator is high-voltage AC.

2.2. Particle Image Velocimetry

Particle image velocimetry (PIV) is a commonly used analytical technique used to evaluate bulk fluid velocity profiles. In this experiment, the PIV setup utilized a Big Sky Laser Ultra Duel Nd:YAG laser that was connected to a pulse generator along with a high-speed Motion Pro X3 camera, as seen in Figure 2. A Taitech DG-100 timing control unit was used to control a Quantum Composers Plus 9518 pulse generator for laser/camera alignment. A Tektronix TDS 2014B oscilloscope was connected between the pulse generator and the lasers to monitor pulse delays. A laser optical setup that consisted of a cylindrical rod and a mixture of convex and concave lenses was used to obtain a <2 mm laser sheet thickness. A ChauvetDJ Hurricane 700 fog generator was used to seed the air for PIV measurements. The time delay, dt, used for this specific experiment was 500 μ s.

2.3. Biological Experiment Setup

For the bacterial inactivation section of this experiment, each cylinder configuration was used as a tube that enclosed a biological sample. The cylinders were rotated sideways and sat flat over the sample in a way to not touch the sample. A plastic cover was used to cover the open end of the cylinder. The entire setup was performed in a biosafety cabinet in a Petri dish. The setup is seen in Figure 3.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Particle Image Velocimetry

Particle image velocimetry (PIV) analysis was used to evaluate the bulk fluid velocity profiles and mixing parameters within cylindrical SDBD plasma actuators with one, two, three, and six electrode arrays. The aim of PIV analysis was to determine the extent to which the actuators were capable of inducing airflow mixing. Since plasma-generated reactive species are known to have biocidal effects, an increase in airflow velocity and mixing capability would theoretically result in improved delivery of reactive species to contaminated surfaces, resulting in increased efficiency for surface decontamination applications. Although SDBD actuators can be constructed and arranged into any three-dimensional structure, a cylindrical structure was used in this study to allow the optimal evaluation of airflow mixing capabilities since no edges or corners are present to influence the airflow dynamics. Additionally, the number of electrodes was varied from between one and six to evaluate the effects of increased plasma volume on the airflow velocity and mixing capabilities. The higher resolution in lower electrode numbers (one, two, and three electrodes) was to observe minute differences between each, while the larger electrode number of six was utilized to observe the upper limit of mixing. To compare the amount of mixing between the various electrode arrangements, several parameters were examined, including vorticity, streamlines, velocity magnitude, and root mean squared (RMS) velocity fluctuation.
For the one-electrode actuators, a strong single vortex was generated near the actuator that entrained only the flow close to the walls (Figure 4). Note that the actuator is positioned in the same location across all plots and their respective schematic. A highly concentrated vortex was clearly visible near the location of the actuator interface where the plasma-induced wall jet is generated (Figure 4b). As expected, this was also the location of maximum particle velocity (Figure 4c) and velocity fluctuation (Figure 4d), indicating a higher degree of mixing.
When two-electrode actuators were used, the flow properties were more uniform within the entire cylindrical region (Figure 5). However, unlike the single small, strong vortex close to the electrode in the one-electrode arrangement (Figure 4c), two larger but comparatively weaker vortices were observed in the two-electrode arrangement (Figure 5c).
Accordingly, when three electrodes were used, three vortices were observed—two of which were considerably smaller than the third (Figure 6). The largest vortex at the center of the cylinder is presumed to influence the plasma-produced particles and redistribute them throughout the cross-section of the flow (Figure 6c). This characteristic results in a more uniform distribution of plasma-generated reactive species and more efficient surface decontamination potential.
The jump to six electrodes continued this trend with the most complete redistribution of particles in the flow (Figure 7). An increase in electrodes also comes with an increase in locations for the induced flow to originate from. Characteristically, more electrodes contribute to an increase in plasma surface area and volume, resulting in a higher concentration of reactive species in the flow.
These results suggest that increasing the number of electrodes and strategic positioning of the electrodes allows greater circulation and promotes better distribution of the induced airflow. Increasing the number of electrodes resulted in increased airflow uniformity and greater airflow mixing within the entire cylindrical region (Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7). This increased airflow uniformity may be attributed to the coupling of the flow of two adjacent opposite-acting actuators that result in a plasma jet directed perpendicularly to the surface. Increased mixing was primarily observed at the point of convergence of streamlines where the two vortices met (Figure 5c and Figure 6c). Thus, a higher number of vortices resulted in increased velocity variation and improved mixing tendencies (Figure 5d and Figure 6d).
Further analysis of the flow field without a cylindrical enclosure revealed that the flow is perpendicular to the semicylindrical actuator surface and the vortices are a result of the obstruction formed by the remainder of the semicylindrical enclosure formed by the transparent shell. These results suggest that increasing the number of electrodes and strategic positioning of the electrodes allows for an increased circulation and optimal mixing of the flow.

3.2. Bacterial Inactivation by Cylindrical SDBD Actuators

All four SDBD actuator arrangements, utilizing one, two, three, and six electrodes, reduced Salmonella enterica populations on the inoculated coverslips after four minutes of treatment. Average log CFU mL-1 reductions of Salmonella cells were 1.30, 1.54, 1.81, and 2.28 for the one-, two-, three-, and six-electrode actuator arrangements, respectively (Figure 8). The average bacterial log reductions for the one-, three-, and six-electrode arrangements were significantly different from each other, while the log reduction from the two-electrode arrangement was only significantly different from the six-electrode arrangement (p ≤ 0.05). These data confirm that the increase in induced airflow of SDBD actuators with increased numbers of electrodes correlates with increased bacterial inactivation. These results suggest that by improved particle velocity, increased airflow mixing, and increased plasma volume results in increased surface decontamination efficiency. It should be noted that bacterial-inoculated coverslips were treated in line with the airflow and particle motion in this study. It is suspected that an increased bacterial reduction efficiency would have been observed if inoculated coverslips were placed perpendicular to the airflow and particle motion. A perpendicular orientation of contaminated substrate to plasma-induced airflow would allow a more direct bombardment of plasma-produced reactive species and would maximize the cell-damaging effects of these particles for surface decontamination applications.

3.3. Assessment of Bacterial Inactivation by Cylindrical SDBD Actuators

A five-strain mixture of Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica (serovars Enteritidis, Typhimurium, Javiana, Seftenburg, and Poona) was used for inoculation of sterile glass coverslips, which were then placed in the center of cylindrical SDBD actuators with one, two, three, and six electrodes and treated for 4 min. Bacterial strains were grown aerobically overnight with shaking (250 rpm) at 37 ° C in 5 mL tryptic soy broth (TSB, Difco, Sparks, MD, USA). The bacterial concentration of each overnight liquid culture was determined by serially diluting the culture in 0.1% (w/v) sterile peptone (Difco, Sparks, MD, USA) and plating in duplicate on tryptic soy agar (TSA, Difco, Sparks, MD, USA), incubated overnight at 37 ° C.
To prepare the inocula, 1 mL of each liquid culture was centrifuged at 9000× g for 3 min and resuspended in 1 mL of 0.1% (w/v) sterile peptone before being combined with all other strains. In addition, 100 μ L of the bacterial suspension (approximately 107 CFU) was used as inoculum and spotted in 20–25 spots (between 105 and 106 CFU/spot) onto single sterile 22 × 22 mm glass coverslips and dried in a biosafety cabinet for 90 min prior to cold plasma treatment. Immediately after cold plasma treatment, treated and untreated control inoculated coverslips were washed by vortexing for 30 s in 10 mL 0.1% (w/v) sterile peptone in 50 mL conical tubes. The wash fluid was ten-fold serially diluted in 0.1% peptone, and 100 μ L of appropriate dilutions was plated in duplicate on TSA and incubated overnight at 37 ° C.
Three biological repeats containing two replicates of each treatment were conducted. Log reductions due to plasma treatment were calculated by comparing the numbers of recovered cells from treated samples and untreated controls. Statistical difference was calculated between treated samples and untreated controls from plate counts by using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with SAS (Statistical Analysis System. Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA). A significant difference was defined at p ≤ 0.05.

4. Conclusions

In summary, using a cylindrical SDBD actuator, a correlation between an increase in the number of electrodes and an increase in the degree of mixing was observed. The increase in electrodes provides more wall locations for airflow to be entrained. Velocity fluctuations increase as well, demonstrating a higher degree of particle redistribution within the airflow. The total number of vortices perceived within the cylindrical structure increased with more electrodes. The area between vortical structures caused the highest fluctuation in velocities, potentially indicating mixing. Additionally, the increase in electrodes yields an increase in total plasma surface area, which is observed to correlate with an increase in bacterial inactivation. More plasma species were generated by the higher plasma volume, and the bacterial inactivation efficiency of these species were enhanced due to the higher particle redistribution rate. A relative decrease in power per plasma surface area in the actuators with more electrodes was not observed to play a role in plasma-based decontamination but needs to be analyzed for changes in the type of dominant species produced when higher power regimes are used. Increased power only produced streamers and heat in this study, which may not be beneficial for actuator longevity.
A cartoon schematic is illustrated below to summarize expected vortices from certain cylindrical electrode configurations (Figure 9). In the case of an odd number of exposed electrodes, the imperfections in the electrodes have one side dominant, thus altering the positions of the expected vortices. In future studies, cylindrical structures could be further explored in cases of electrodes all the way around the cylinder with the jet vectors, all directed inward along with various combinations of laid along the wall to accelerate or interrupt the flow. In this study, by utilizing a cylindrical configuration and using an increased number of electrodes, a higher efficiency SDBD actuator in terms of degree of airflow mixing is possible for bacterial inactivation. Potential applications of these findings span multiple disciplines for surface decontamination of complex structures.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.P., C.T., L.M.M. and J.J.; metholodogy, formal analysis, validation, investigation, and data curation, A.D.N., K.P. and C.T.; resources and supervision, L.M.M. and J.J.; writing—original draft preparation, A.D.N., K.P. and C.T.; writing—review and editing, A.D.N., K.P., C.T., L.M.M. and J.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this paper in the form of raw high-speed camera images used as inputs into PIV processing as well as the analyzed DaVis PIV velocity vectors are all available upon request from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. There are no conflicts of interest from the co-authors Kedar Pai and Christopher Timmons at Plasma Bionics with the work discussed in this paper. At the time of involvement with the project, they were not at Plasma Bionics LLC yet. Plasma Bionics LLC had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ANOVAAnalysis of Variance
CAPCold Atmospheric Plasma
PIVParticle Image Velocimetry
PWMPulse Width Modulation
RMSRoot Mean Squared
RONSReactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species
SASStatistical Analysis System
SDBDSurface Dielectric Barrier Discharge
VDBDVolumetric Dielectric Barrier Discharge

References

  1. Laroussi, M. Nonthermal decontamination of biological media by atmospheric-pressure plasmas: Review, analysis, and prospects. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2002, 30, 1409–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Moisan, M.; Barbeau, J.; Moreau, S.; Pelletier, J.; Tabrizian, M.; Yahia, L. Low-temperature sterilization using gas plasmas: A review of the experiments and an analysis of the inactivation mechanisms. Int. J. Pharm. 2001, 226, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kong, M.G.; Kroesen, G.; Morfill, G.; Nosenko, T.; Shimizu, T.; van Dijk, J.; Zimmermann, J.L. Plasma medicine: An introductory review. New J. Phys. 2009, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Moreau, E. Airflow control by non-thermal plasma actuators. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2007, 40, 605–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Corke, T.C.; Enloe, C.L.; Wilkinson, S.P. Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuators for Flow Control. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2010, 42, 505–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Laroussi, M.; Alexeff, I.; Kang, W.L. Biological Decontamination by Nonthermal. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2000, 28, 184–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Laroussi, M.; Leipold, F. Evaluation of the roles of reactive species, heat, and UV radiation in the inactivation of bacterial cells by air plasmas at atmospheric pressure. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 233, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Herrmann, H.W.; Henins, I.; Park, J.; Selwyn, G.S. Decontamination of chemical and biological warfare (CBW) agents using an atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ). Phys. Plasmas 1999, 6, 2284–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Boudam, M.K.; Moisan, M.; Saoudi, B.; Popovici, C.; Gherardi, N.; Massines, F. Bacterial spore inactivation by atmospheric-pressure plasmas in the presence or absence of UV photons as obtained with the same gas mixture. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2006, 39, 3494–3507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Timmons, C.; Pai, K.; Jacob, J.; Zhang, G.; Ma, L.M. Inactivation of Salmonella enterica, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, and Listeria monocytogenes by a novel surface discharge cold plasma design. Food Control 2018, 84, 455–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pai, K.K.; Singarapu, K.; Jacob, J.D.; Madihally, S.V. Dose Dependent Selectivity and Response of Different Types of Mammalian Cells to Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge (SDBD) Plasma. Plasma Process. Polym. 2015, 12, 666–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ngo, A.; Pai, K.K.; Jacob, J.D. Investigation of Scaling Effects Due to Varying Dielectric Materials in Asymmetric Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge. Aerosp. Res. Cent. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pai, K.K. Asymmetric Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge as a Novel Method for Biological Decontamination. Ph.D. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pai, K.K.; Jacob, J.D. Evaluation of Dielectric Barrier Discharge Configurationsfor Biological Decontamination. Aerosp. Res. Cent. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Enloe, C.L.; McLaughlin, T.E.; VanDyken, R.D.; Kachner, K.D.; Jumper, E.J.; Corke, T.C. Mechanisms and Responses of a Single Dielectric Barrier Plasma Actuator: Plasma Morphology. AIAA J. 2004, 42, 589–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flowchart of the electronics setup for the actuator.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the electronics setup for the actuator.
Plasma 04 00038 g001
Figure 2. PIV setup schematic.
Figure 2. PIV setup schematic.
Plasma 04 00038 g002
Figure 3. Schematic of the biological experimental setup.
Figure 3. Schematic of the biological experimental setup.
Plasma 04 00038 g003
Figure 4. (a) Schematic of one electrode (1E) actuator (not to scale), (b) 1E vorticity plot, (c) 1E streamline and velocity magnitude plot, and (d) 1E RMS velocity plot.
Figure 4. (a) Schematic of one electrode (1E) actuator (not to scale), (b) 1E vorticity plot, (c) 1E streamline and velocity magnitude plot, and (d) 1E RMS velocity plot.
Plasma 04 00038 g004
Figure 5. (a) Schematic of two electrode (2E) actuator (not to scale), (b) 2E vorticity plot, (c) 2E streamline and velocity magnitude plot, and (d) 2E RMS velocity plot.
Figure 5. (a) Schematic of two electrode (2E) actuator (not to scale), (b) 2E vorticity plot, (c) 2E streamline and velocity magnitude plot, and (d) 2E RMS velocity plot.
Plasma 04 00038 g005
Figure 6. (a) Schematic of three electrode (3E) actuator (not to scale), (b) 3E vorticity plot, (c) 3E streamline and velocity magnitude plot, and (d) 3E RMS velocity plot.
Figure 6. (a) Schematic of three electrode (3E) actuator (not to scale), (b) 3E vorticity plot, (c) 3E streamline and velocity magnitude plot, and (d) 3E RMS velocity plot.
Plasma 04 00038 g006
Figure 7. (a) Schematic of six electrode (6E) actuator (not to scale), (b) 6E vorticity plot, (c) 6E streamline and velocity magnitude plot, and (d) 6E RMS velocity plot.
Figure 7. (a) Schematic of six electrode (6E) actuator (not to scale), (b) 6E vorticity plot, (c) 6E streamline and velocity magnitude plot, and (d) 6E RMS velocity plot.
Plasma 04 00038 g007
Figure 8. Average log reduction (CFU mL−1) of Salmonella cells inoculated onto glass coverslips placed within SDBD actuators with one, two, three, and six electrodes and treated for four minutes.
Figure 8. Average log reduction (CFU mL−1) of Salmonella cells inoculated onto glass coverslips placed within SDBD actuators with one, two, three, and six electrodes and treated for four minutes.
Plasma 04 00038 g008
Figure 9. Cartoon schematic of expected vortices from one, two, three, and six exposed electrode cylindrical actuators.
Figure 9. Cartoon schematic of expected vortices from one, two, three, and six exposed electrode cylindrical actuators.
Plasma 04 00038 g009
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ngo, A.D.; Pai, K.; Timmons, C.; Ma, L.M.; Jacob, J. Evaluation of Cylindrical Asymmetric Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge Actuators for Surface Decontamination and Mixing. Plasma 2021, 4, 755-763. https://doi.org/10.3390/plasma4040038

AMA Style

Ngo AD, Pai K, Timmons C, Ma LM, Jacob J. Evaluation of Cylindrical Asymmetric Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge Actuators for Surface Decontamination and Mixing. Plasma. 2021; 4(4):755-763. https://doi.org/10.3390/plasma4040038

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ngo, Alvin D., Kedar Pai, Christopher Timmons, Li Maria Ma, and Jamey Jacob. 2021. "Evaluation of Cylindrical Asymmetric Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge Actuators for Surface Decontamination and Mixing" Plasma 4, no. 4: 755-763. https://doi.org/10.3390/plasma4040038

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop