Previous Article in Journal
Are Implant-Supported Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns a Viable Alternative to Metal-Ceramics? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design and Mechanical Properties of ZTA–Niobium Composites with Reduced Graphene Oxide
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

MXenes: Properties, Applications, and Potential in 3D Printing

by
Donato Luca Palladino
and
Francesco Baino
*
Institute of Materials Physics and Engineering, Department of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Ceramics 2025, 8(2), 64; https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics8020064
Submission received: 13 April 2025 / Revised: 11 May 2025 / Accepted: 20 May 2025 / Published: 23 May 2025

Abstract

:
MXenes, a class of two-dimensional materials with appealing properties such as electrical conductivity, mechanical strength, and chemical stability, is rapidly gaining attention for potential applications in various fields, including energy storage, water treatment, biomedicine, and electromagnetic shielding. One of the most exciting developments is their integration with 3D printing technologies, which allows for precise control over material structure and composition. This combination has significantly expanded the scope of MXenes, particularly in electrochemical storage systems like supercapacitors and batteries, where 3D-printed MXene-based materials have demonstrated superior performance. This review article provides a detailed analysis of the synthesis, properties, and applications of MXenes, with a particular focus on their role in additive manufacturing. While the synergy between MXenes and 3D printing offers numerous advantages, challenges such as large-scale production, material stability, and refining processing techniques remain significant hurdles; all these issues are discussed in the present work. Future research directions are also highlighted that aim to enhance scalability, reduce costs, and explore new composite formulations to optimize the performance of MXenes across various applications.

1. Introduction

Two-dimensional (2D) materials have garnered significant attention due to their unique properties and outstanding potential for various scientific and technological applications. Unlike traditional bulk materials, which have a three-dimensional atomic arrangement, 2D materials are characterized by their atomic or molecular thickness, typically less than 5 nm. This ultra-thin structure results in exceptional mechanical, electronic, optical, and thermal properties, which are related to their reduced dimensionality and increased surface-to-volume ratio. These materials have demonstrated promising applications in energy storage and conversion, catalysis, sensing, biomedicine, and flexible electronics [1].
MXenes are typically produced by selectively etching the A layers from MAX phases (Mn+1AXn), a group of layered ternary carbides and nitrides, through chemical processes that result in 2D structures with tunable surface functionalities (specific details will be provided in Section 2) [2].
Within the family of 2D materials, MXenes have emerged as a particularly interesting class of transition metal carbides and nitrides. MXenes show high electrical conductivity, excellent mechanical strength, good chemical stability, remarkable hydrophilicity, and tunable surface chemistry, making them promising candidates for a wide range of applications, including energy storage (e.g., supercapacitors and lithium-ion batteries), water treatment, electromagnetic shielding, and biomedicine (e.g., biosensing and cancer therapy due to their exceptional biocompatibility) [1,3,4].
In recent years, the interest in advanced manufacturing techniques has increased, and the integration of MXenes into 3D printing has emerged as a revolutionary approach for fabricating intricate architectures with improved functionalities. Three-dimensional (3D) printing, or additive manufacturing, enables precise structural control and customization, which, when combined with the exceptional properties of MXenes, paves the way for innovative applications. Recent studies have demonstrated that 3D-printed MXene-based materials exhibit superior performance in various fields and their adaptability in forming stable suspensions makes them highly versatile for a lot of printing technologies, expanding their practical implementation [1,4].
This review article explores the synthesis, properties, and diverse applications of MXenes, emphasizing their role in 3D printing technologies. By leveraging the synergy between MXenes and additive manufacturing, researchers can develop next-generation materials for energy storage, electronics, biomedicine, and more. The continuous advancement of scalable synthesis and printing methodologies will improve MXene accessibility, driving their industrial adoption and technological impact in the years to come.

2. Synthesis of MXenes: Methods and Approaches

Two-dimensional materials are distinguished by their high surface areas and their single- or few-layer nanosheet structures at the atomic scale. They are characterized by a layered configuration held together by weak van der Waals interactions, enabling their production through mechanical or liquid exfoliation from bulk 3D precursors, or via nano-chemical vapor deposition (nano-CVD) [5].
Since the discovery of graphene in 2004, researchers have shown significant interest on 2D materials due to their potentials in many fields, including electronics, biomedical, optoelectronics, and environmental remediation. This class of 2D materials took a groundbreaking turn with the discovery of MXene in 2011 [6].
MXene refers to transition metal carbides (TMC) and transition metal nitrides (TMN). The most common method used to synthesize this class of materials is the etching method from MAX phases, which serve as the 3D bulk precursor of MXenes (Figure 1). MAX phases belong to a group of ternary ceramics, specifically carbides or nitrides [7,8,9], where M represents the transition element, A is the main group element, and X denotes carbon and/or nitrogen [10]. These phases are divided into four categories (see also Figure 2 [11]), including more than 150 combinations [12] depending on the n value, and utilize 14 M and 16 A elements: M2AX (n = 1), M3AX2 (n = 2), M4AX3 (n = 3), and M5AX4 (n = 4). To date, more than 50 different MXenes have been successfully synthesized [9]. Due to the weak van der Waals forces between the A and MX layers, the layer A can be easily etched to obtain the MX material. The result is a material with structural and functional properties (e.g., physical and electrochemical characteristics) similar to graphene. MXenes can be generally defined by the formula Mn + 1XnTx (n = 1–4), consisting of a transition metal layer (M) (e.g., Ti, Mo, Cr), carbon–nitrogen layer (X) (e.g., C), and a surface termination group (T) (e.g., -F, -OH, -O). The complete list of elements indicated in parentheses (M, X, and T) is provided in Figure 2C. These materials are typically categorized into three main families: M2XTx, M3×2Tx, and M4X3Tx. Each family contains multiple materials: for example, the M2XTx type includes Ti2CTx and Mo2CTx; M3X2Tx includes Ti3C2Tx and Cr3C2Tx; M4X3Tx contains Nb4C3Tx and Ti4N3Tx [10].

2.1. Structure of MXenes

MXenes belong to the hexagonal crystal system and the P63/mmc space group, the same as MAX phases. In MAX phases, the transition metal (M) and carbon–nitrogen (X) atoms are covalently bonded to form the M₆X octahedra, with the X atoms positioned at the center [10]. The M atoms are hexagonally close-packed (HCP), while the A atoms occupy the interstitial spaces [12]. These A atoms have weaker bonding energy than M and X atoms, making them easier to remove chemically through selective etching. During this process, the covalent M-X bonds remain intact, but new surface terminations (-OH, -O, -F) are introduced, compressing the structure and resulting in a 2D HCP structure layered configuration [13]. Conventional studies often overlook surface defects and assume uniform distribution of T terminations [10]. Mn+1XnTx has three types of structure as shown in Figure 3 [14].
On a microscopic scale, MXenes resemble a multi-layered accordion-like structure, where strong van der Waals forces keep the layers interconnected. The abundance of surface terminations gives MXenes exceptional hydrophilicity, comparable to that of graphene oxide [15], as well as electrical conductivity and notable storage performance that make them unique among 2D materials [10].
The tunability of MXene surfaces, which play a critical role in defining their properties, has become a focal point for researchers aiming to develop a wide range of MXene types tailored for many applications [10].
MXenes are commonly synthetized by selective etching of the A layer from their MAX phases. There are two possible approaches: top-down and bottom-up. The former method is currently the most extensively studied, while the latter requires further exploration to achieve its full potential on a practical scale [6].

2.2. Top-Down Approach

The top-down approach involves a wet chemical etching process. In this method, the A layer in the MAX phase, which is chemically reactive and weakly bonded, is removed through etching to produce MXene [6].

2.2.1. HF Etching and Fluoride-Based Acid Etching

HF etching is the most effective method for synthesizing MXenes. The first successful demonstration occurred in 2011, when the Al layer was removed from the Ti3AlC2 MAX phase at room temperature using a 50% HF solution over 2 h. This process occurs in two distinct steps. In the first step, Ti3C2 with high surface activity is generated (Equation (1)). Subsequently, Ti3C2 reacts with the solution to form surface terminations, as outlined in Equations (2) and (3) [16].
Ti3AlC2 + 3HF = AlF3 + 32H2 + Ti3C2
Ti3C2 + 2H2O = Ti3C2(OH)2 + H2
Ti3C2 + 2HF = Ti3C2F2 + H2
The general formulas for MXenes etched through HF solutions are Mn+1Xn(OH)xOyFz or Mn+1XnTx. The nature of the Tx functional groups depends on the etching method; in this case, the terminations are a mix of -OH, -O, and -F. The specific etching conditions vary depending on the precursor material being processed. Both the M element and the n value significantly influence the strength and duration of the etching process: lower M and n values result in a weaker and faster etching reaction. Additionally, the type of A element affects the M-A bond strength [16]. For example, Ti-Si bonds are stronger than Ti-Al bonds, necessitating the use of oxidant-assisted HF methods to produce the same type of MXene from different MAX phases [17]. HF etching is not the simplest and most versatile process and cannot be applied for mass production of MXenes due to its high toxicity, strong corrosiveness, and operational risks. Other softer and safer fluorine-containing salts (e.g., NaF, KF, NH4F, FeF3, LiF) can be used to etch the A layer. The etching results may vary depending on the chosen salt due to differences in their solubility and the adsorption energy of their positive ions. LiF is one of the hardest to dissolve in water; consequently, the concentration of Li in LiF-exfoliated MXene is high, conferring different adsorption capabilities, such as methane adsorption. Furthermore, an open or closed environment can influence the etching effects [16].

2.2.2. Molten Salt Method

Fluorine-based approaches are not suitable for synthesizing all types of MXenes. Nitrogen-based MXenes (Transition Metal Nitrides (TMNs)) can easily dissolve in HF etching solution due to their instability, which arises from their lower cohesive energy compared to carbide MXenes. In contrast, molten salt synthesis is a sustainable, simple, fast, and efficient alternative, enabling the preparation of fluorine-free MXenes. This method also opens new opportunities for tailoring surface terminations. The process involves mixing the reactants and salts in precise proportions, followed by heating the mixture in a controlled atmosphere, such as in vacuum or inert gas (Figure 4 [18]). Then, the reactants undergo chemical reactions within the molten salt environment, resulting in materials with unique morphological properties [10]. A final washing step is required to isolate pure MXenes. For optimal reaction efficiency, the process necessitates salts with large grain sizes and a significant temperature gap between their melting (Tm) and boiling (Tb) points [19]. MXenes derived from molten salt methods, particularly TMNs, show great potential for applications in supercapacitors [10].

2.2.3. Lewis Acidic Etching Methods

The Lewis acidic etching method has emerged as one of the most extensively studied synthesis techniques in recent years. It is also known as the element replacement approach due to its potentials in modifying terminal groups, enhancing MXene performances like energy storage, and enabling covalent modification. The Lewis acidic method is a green, safe, straightforward, and controllable method similar to the molten salt approach but with some differences in the etching mechanism [20].
Lewis acid salts, typically transitioned metal halides, such as CuCl2, ZnCl2, CuI, and ZnBr2, are covalent compounds that cannot be involved in the traditional molten salt synthesis due to their narrow temperature range between melting (Tm) and boiling (Tb) points. The essence of the reaction lies in establishing a redox potential between the molten salt and the precursor phase, enabling the selective etching of the MAX phase through a Gibbs free energy exchange reaction at high temperatures [10].

2.2.4. Electrochemical Etching

Electrochemical etching is a sustainable and efficient method (Figure 5) [21]. The A layer is selectively etched from the MAX phase precursor through the interaction between the electron flow and Gibbs free energy. An electrochemical reaction took place through the application of a certain voltage in a circuit with an electrolyte and an electrode (the MAX phase). Electrolyte design, voltage control, and the duration of the reaction are critical factors in achieving a high-quality MXene [10]. Specifically, high voltage can cause the breaking of M-A bonds, removing the M layer after A layer etching. Other advantages of this process include the absence of toxic fluoride ions and the low energy consumption, which contribute to the environmental friendliness of this method. Avoiding the use of traditional etchants prevents issues like low purity and the introduction of fluorine-containing groups [22].

2.3. Bottom-Up Approach

The bottom-up approach, in contrast to the top-down approach, does not exfoliate MXenes from MAX phases but instead uses small organic and inorganic molecules or molecular materials as precursors to make MXene crystals grow. This approach is appealing due to its simplicity, faster functionalization, greater versatility, and more precise structural and morphological control than the top-down approach and easy surface manipulation. However, more research is still needed for mass production [3].

CVD Process

Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) is still in its early stages of study for MXene synthesis, but it has already shown a great promise [16]. In 2015, a strategy was proposed to grow 2D high quality α-Mo2C crystals using methane as the carbon source and a Co/Mo foil as molybdenum source. At high temperature, methane decomposes and copper melts, then methane carbon atoms react with Mo diffusing on the surface. This process results in the formation of Mo2C crystals with remarkable characteristics such as ultra-thin thickness (few nanometers), large lateral size (100 µm), low defect density, and excellent stability [23]. Subsequent studies have extended this approach to synthesize Mo2N on Cu/Mo using ammonia as a N source [24] and WC and TaC by using, respectively, W and Ta foils instead of Mo ones [25].
The CVD process offers a precise control over the thickness, composition, and structure of the resulting film, enabling the fine-tuning of MXene properties for specific applications and structure with a lower amount of defects as compared to other synthesis methods. However, several challenges remain, including the requirement for tightly controlled gas environments, high processing temperatures, and extended reaction times, all of which can hinder scalability and affect the quality of the final material [26]. Additionally, the need for sophisticated equipment and highly skilled operators is a significant limitation [27]. Furthermore, the dependence on specific substrates may further constrain the versatility of this technique [26].

2.4. Other Synthesis Methods

Despite the extensive research already conducted on MXene synthesis methods, the suitability of these processes for large-scale production remains a key issue. Among the approaches previously discussed, top-down techniques such as electrochemical and molten salt etching have emerged as the most scalable alternatives, offering improved safety and control over traditional HF-based methods. In contrast, bottom-up strategies like CVD are still largely unexplored for mass production and currently appear impractical due to high cost and complexity [28].
Over the years, numerous studies and alternative approaches have been developed that seem to be promising for MXene synthesis. However, most of these methods require improvements and further research. Table 1 provides a summary of the previously described techniques and offers some examples of these recent promising methods. Water-free etching is a well-suited method for use in organic systems, where delamination is possible just through ultrasonication. However, this method has notable drawbacks, including long duration and multiple washing steps that require further optimization. Another reported top-down approach is alkaline solution etching, which, like water-free etching, produces accordion-like structures but without fluorine functional groups. Among bottom-up methods, in situ electrochemical etching stands out as an efficient, sustainable, and convenient process, though it is presently restricted to applications in the energy storage sector [16].
One significant challenge in achieving the mass production of MXene-based devices lies in reducing the synthesis process duration. Current methods, such as HF etching, require several hours to be completed, highlighting the need for advancements or innovative approaches to enhance efficiency and scalability.
A novel microwave-assisted method was developed for the rapid synthesis of Ti3C2Tx MXene, achieving complete etching of the Al layer from the Ti3AlC2 MAX phase in just 30 s. Using HF as the etchant and microwave irradiation at 600 W and 2.5 GHz, high-quality MXene sheets with an undistorted layered structure were obtained. Characterization techniques such as XRD, FTIR, Raman spectroscopy, and FESEM confirmed the successful removal of Al and the preservation of the layered morphology, along with a slight oxidation to anatase (TiO2). The synthesized material exhibited a high specific capacitance of 282 F g⁻1 at 5 A g⁻1, reduced charge transfer resistance, and excellent cyclic stability, retaining 88% of its capacitance after 10,000 cycles. Furthermore, an asymmetric solid-state supercapacitor fabricated with the Ti3C2Tx electrode achieved an energy density of 23 Wh kg⁻1 and a power density of 750 W kg⁻1, demonstrating the potential of this rapid synthesis approach for large-scale energy storage applications [36].

3. Properties of MXenes

The layered structures and surface functional groups of MXenes endow them with exceptional properties, paving the way for a wide range of applications for these promising materials. The 3D bulk precursors of MXenes (MAX phases), along with delamination and synthesis methods, play a critical role in determining their properties [3]. The most interesting features of MXenes are outlined in the next sections.

3.1. Mechanical Properties

MXenes exhibit outstanding mechanical properties, including remarkable flexibility, high tensile strength, and significant flexural rigidity. The Young’s modulus of a Ti3C2Tx monolayer has been calculated to range between 0.33 TPa and 0.03 TPa, making it the highest among all 2D materials, including graphene oxide (GO). Notably, the flexibility of Ti3C2Tx is impressive: it has been reported that a Ti3C2Tx film can support up to 4000 times its weight without experiencing any shape distortion or structural damage [6].
The elastic behavior of MXenes is strongly influenced by their surface terminal groups. Specifically, the strength and length of surface bonds play a key role in determining their mechanical properties. Experimental studies indicate that MXenes with O-terminal groups are the most suitable candidates for applications such as supercapacitors and structural materials due to their exceptional flexibility [3]. The Ti-O bond is notably stronger than the Ti-OH and Ti-F terminations [37]. Density Functional Theory (DFT) simulations conducted on Ti3C2 and Ti2C with different surface terminations have demonstrated that shorter bond lengths—such as those associated with oxygen groups—indicate stronger contacts, whereas F and OH bonds, being longer, result in weaker interactions [38].
Regarding Ti-C bonds, previous studies have shown that Ti2C, Ti3C2, and Ti₄C3 MXenes exhibit considerable rigidity. However, graphene remains a superior alternative due to its higher strength and stiffness [37]. Additionally, M-N and M-C bonds contribute to the tensile strength of MXenes, reaching 1050 GPa [39] and opening significant opportunities for their use as reinforcing materials in composite structures. While MXenes may demonstrate slightly lower performance compared to graphene, they offer excellent compatibility with polymeric phase to produce composites.
The thickness and number of layers also significantly influence the Young’s modulus of MXenes. When comparing carbide and nitride MXenes, the latter exhibit higher maximum values. In both cases, a decrease in the number of layers correlates with an increase in the Young’s modulus [37].

3.2. Chemical Stability

The oxidation state of MXenes depends on their surface terminal groups and is generally lower than that of the corresponding metal oxides. The stability of MXenes is heavily influenced by their surrounding environment [6]. For example, the stability of Ti3C2Tx colloidal solutions was tested under ambient conditions. It was observed that the solution degrades into TiO2 within 15 days, identifying air, specifically oxygen, as the primary factor responsible for the oxidation of Ti3C2Tx [40,41].
Water also plays a significant role in the degradation of MXene solutions. Colloidal solutions of Ti2CTx and Ti3C2Tx degrade within 41 days in a water/argon environment. In contrast, when exposed to an IPA/oxygen environment, the degradation process is significantly slower, taking approximately 5.5 years to achieve similar results [42].
MXene oxidation can be mitigated through the use of antioxidants, such as sodium L-ascorbate, and by maintaining specific environmental conditions, which vary depending on the MXene type. For instance, V2Ctx remains stable in an argon atmosphere at temperatures below 375 °C, whereas Ti3C2Tx can maintain its stability in argon up to 800 °C [40,41] (see Figure 6 [43]).
MXenes exhibit a remarkable hydrophilic nature, due to the presence of O and OH surface groups, which play a crucial role in enabling strong interactions with water. These groups enhance the ability of MXenes to attract and spread water across their surface. The ratio of surface terminations can be precisely controlled through synthesis methods, allowing for the optimization of their hydrophilic properties. This characteristic is particularly valuable in the production of inks for 3D printing of composite electrodes, where achieving a stable and uniform dispersion of materials in solvents is essential [44].

3.3. Optical Properties

MXenes are distinguished by their linear (e.g., absorption) and nonlinear (e.g., refractive index) optical properties, which are influenced by their energy structures, including energy band gaps (both direct and indirect) and topological insulator characteristics. Additionally, surface terminal groups play a critical role in shaping these optical properties. Notable optical attributes of MXenes include high transparency, strong plasmonic behavior, and a pronounced photo-thermal effect [37].
The optical performance of MXenes is also dependent on temperature. For instance, Nb-based MXene films show a reduction in optical performance as temperature increases, whereas Ti-based MXenes retain stable optical properties at ambient temperature [37]. MXenes demonstrate exceptional light-to-heat energy conversion with 100% efficiency, which opens promising applications in the biomedical field (e.g., photo-thermal therapies) and water evaporation systems [45].
MXenes exhibit absorption peaks spanning wavelengths from ultraviolet (UV) to near-infrared (NIR). Their strong UV-light absorption has led to extensive research into their use in photovoltaic and photocatalytic applications. Furthermore, their high flexibility, UV absorption, and remarkable transparency make MXenes ideal candidates for transparent conductive electrodes [37]. A Ti3C2Tx film with a thickness of 10 nm revealed a 91% transmittance [46], which can be further enhanced through ion intercalation (e.g., with tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide) or by reducing film thickness (see also Figure 7 [47]) [37]. Transmittance increases as the film thickness decreases [3].
Z-scan measurements revealed that Ti3C2Tx exhibits a high nonlinear optical absorption coefficient and a negative nonlinear refractive index, with values significantly surpassing those of graphene, transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), and black phosphorus (BP) [38].

3.4. Electronic and Electrical Properties

MXenes are highly valuable materials for electronic and electrical applications due to their exceptional properties and the ability to fine-tune these characteristics. One of their most notable features is their high electrical conductivity, which makes them ideal for energy storage, supercapacitors, and electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding [44]. Among MXenes, Ti3C2Tx is the most studied for such applications [37], exhibiting a metallic conductivity of 2400 S/cm [48]. However, V2C surpasses this with an impressive value of 3300 S/cm [48], paving the way for promising applications in wearable electronics [37]. Ti3C2Tx MXenes exhibit strong metallic and electrical conductivity, enhancing their electrocatalytic performance. Specifically, Ti2COm MXenes show a carrier mobility of 1.03×10⁴ cm2 V⁻1 s⁻1, which is significantly higher than that of graphene, with a carrier mobility ranging from 0.3 to 1.2 × 103 cm2 V⁻1 s⁻1. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO), both of which have a conductivity of around 15,100 S/cm, also offer impressive electrical conductivity; however, the unique properties of MXenes allow them to perform better in electrocatalytic applications, revealing their potential advantages over these other 2D materials [3,49].
Moreover, Table 2 [50] presents the capacitance values of different 2D materials in aqueous electrolytes, highlighting the exceptional capacitance and rate capabilities of MXenes.
MXenes stand out as some of the most attractive materials for electronics, thanks to their tunable properties. By modifying surface functional groups, altering the ratio of M and X elements in the layered structure, or doping, it is possible to engineer a wide range of materials with tailored characteristics. Surface terminations significantly influence MXene properties (Figure 8 [55]); for example, replacing –F or −Cl groups with −OH can enhance electrical conductivity. Additionally, intercalating carbon or nitrogen, creating surface vacancies, or introducing dislocations can further optimize their performance. Doping multi-layer MXenes often yields superior results [37].
The electronic nature of MXenes can range from metallic (e.g., Ti2C and Ti3C2, with high electron density near the Fermi level [38]) to semiconductive (e.g., Ti3C2(OH)2 and Ti3C2F2 monolayers [38]), or even insulating, depending on structural and functional group modifications [44]. Surface manipulation offers a powerful tool to tailor their semiconductive behavior [38].
Moreover, environmental moisture has been observed to enhance MXene electrical conductivity, opening new possibilities for sensing applications [37]. High electrical conductivity is crucial for achieving high power densities and can also reduce the need for additional conductive materials in the fabrication of electrodes and current collectors [44].

3.5. Surface Modification and Multifunctionalization

The most studied MXenes feature hydroxyl (-OH), oxygen (-O), or fluorine (-F) terminal groups, which provide these materials with high stability, a significant surface charge, and a hydrophilic nature. However, after delamination, MXenes often require enhancements to certain properties, making surface engineering a critical factor [25].
Surface modification is typically achieved through two main approaches: polymer-based strategies and inorganic particle surface chemistry. The former approach involves the immobilization of specific molecules or polymers onto the MXene surface via non-covalent or covalent interactions. For example, soybean phospholipids (SPs) have been utilized to modify the surface of Ta4C3Tx films, enhancing their stability in physiological environments [24]. An example of inorganic particle-based surface chemistry [24] is the preparation of AuNPs/Ti3C2Tx, achieved by immobilizing gold nanoparticles on the MXene surface to improve electrical conductivity [56].
The layered structure of MXenes, characterized by a high surface area and significant interlayer distances, facilitates ion intercalation, which can improve energy storage performance in applications such as batteries and supercapacitors [37]. Figure 9 illustrates the structure of Ti3C2Tx and provides a simplified scheme of the intercalation process, highlighting the increased interlayer spacing after ion insertion. Electrochemical intercalation of Ti3C2Tx cations, such as Al3+, is one example, with other ions like Li+, Na+, Mg2+, K+, and NH4+ also being widely studied [57].
However, the structure of MXenes still carries important challenges. Their tendency to reassemble and the lack of a controlled porosity are notable limitations [3]. In order to address these issues, a study proposed a method involving sequential bridging using hydrogen and covalent bonding agents to achieve optimal layer density and reduce vacancies in MXenes [24]. Table 3 lists additional approaches designed to control porosity and voids [3].
Nevertheless, many of the multifunctionalization techniques discussed above still require further research, especially considering that studies on graphene and graphene oxide (GO) are more advanced at present [25].

4. Applications

4.1. Biomedical Applications

Thanks to their interesting and highly tunable properties, such as hydrophilicity, large surface area, and exceptional conductivity, MXenes became promising materials for a wide range of biomedical applications (Figure 10 [24]) [25]. This section explores some of the most significant and recent studies in this field.
Inorganic MXene-based materials possess appealing properties, often surpassing those of organic materials, which typically offer exceptional biocompatibility but are frequently prone to significant chemical and thermal instability. MXenes are distinguished by their highly tunable structure and multifunctionalization capabilities [25], chemical affinity [11], remarkable physiological stability, and excellent biosafety [25]. For biomedical applications, toxicity and biocompatibility require careful consideration. MXene biosafety can be compromised by factors such as exfoliation, nanotoxicity/cell internalization [58], release of toxic ions, and generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which all carry potential hazards to cells, organs, and tissues [11]. Numerous studies have been conducted to assess the biosafety of MXenes, but further efforts are needed, particularly to certify their long-term stability [25]. Both in vivo (e.g., on mice [25]) and in vitro (e.g., using cell cultures [11]) studies have demonstrated low toxicity levels for MXenes. For instance, in an in vitro experiment, Ti3C2-SP and Ta4C3-SP films showed negligible effect on 4T1 cell viability. Similarly, in vivo tests on mice demonstrated normal behavior after administration of Nb2C-PVP at a dosage of 20 mg/kg [25].
MXene can be incorporated in biomedical coatings to improve biocompatibility and make them electrically conductive, as recently reviewed by Anvari Hohestani et al. [59]. In this regard, an interesting example includes the study of Mayerberger et al. [60] who incorporated Ti3C2Tx MXene flakes into chitosan nanofibers for use in passive antibacterial wound dressings. Antibacterial tests against E. coli and S. aureus also showed a significant reduction in colony-forming units, with decreases of 95% and 62%, respectively [59].
Surface modification and the use of polymer composites are effective strategies to enhance biosafety and prevent the degradation of MXenes [11]. For instance, the incorporation of OTES-functionalized Ti3C2Tz MXene into poly(lactic acid) membranes has been shown to improve biocompatibility, promoting cell adhesion, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation, while also enhancing mechanical properties [61].

4.1.1. Biosensing

MXene-based biosensors have been tested in the human body to detect and analyze biomolecules and their effects. These biosensors consist of three main components: a sensing element to identify the target, a transducer to convert biochemical signals into electrical signals, and a data interpreter for analysis [11]. The exceptional properties of MXenes, such as their large surface area [25] and high charge activity for efficient target capture [62], excellent photon absorption capability, rapid electron transfer fluorescence quenching [25], and remarkable sensitivity and selectivity [58], make them highly promising for a wide range of biosensing applications. Electrochemical biosensors, known for their rapid response, simplicity, and cost-effectiveness, have also demonstrated significant potential in applications such as pesticide detection and analysis in agriculture, specifically for paraoxon [62]. Furthermore, MXene-based biosensors have shown optimal performance in detecting glucose, circulating tumor DNA [11], dopamine [25], NADH, and uric acid [58]. For instance, an electrochemical biosensor using antibody-functionalized Ti3C2Tx MXene nanosheets was developed for point-of-care detection of vitamin D. The sensor achieved high sensitivity (LOD of 1 pg mL⁻1) and a wide dynamic range (0.1–500 ng mL⁻1), suitable for clinical screening of deficiency and toxicity levels. This MXene-based platform is low-cost, fast, and ideal for remote diagnostics [63].

4.1.2. Imaging

Quantum size effects, intrinsic photothermal properties, element-driven contrast enhancement, and efficient loading of functional contrast agents (CAs) make MXenes highly suitable for imaging applications. The most extensively studied imaging modalities include photoacoustic imaging (PAI), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), X-ray computed tomography (CT), and luminescent imaging [64]. PAI is a non-invasive, non-ionizing technique that overcomes optical photon scattering to enable deep tissue imaging. It generates photoacoustic signals from the light absorption of tissue molecules, which are then converted into images via a transducer, effectively capturing biological information [24]. Among the explored materials, Nb2C-MSNs-SNO composite nanosheets have exhibited exceptional performance as PA contrast agents [64], while Nb2CTx-PVP stands out for its remarkable stability and photothermal conversion efficiency [24]. Additionally, Ta4C3-SP nanosheets have shown promising contrast-enhancement capabilities [25]. MRI offers excellent spatial resolution, superior soft tissue contrast, and the advantage of avoiding ionizing radiation [64]. Ti3C2 MXenes have demonstrated significant potential in MRI applications due to their enhanced contrast properties [65]. CT imaging remains one of the most widely used methods due to its effectiveness, non-invasive nature, and ability to achieve deep tissue penetration. It generates 3D scans by segmentally scanning a body section with X-rays. Notably, MnOx/Ta4C3Tx-SP composite nanosheets have shown superior performance in CT imaging compared to iodine-based iopromide [66], a commonly used clinical agent, owing to tantalum’s high X-ray attenuation coefficient [24]. For luminescent imaging, the production of MXene quantum dots (MQDs) significantly enhances luminescent properties [67]. MQDs exhibit small dimensions, strong photoluminescence (PL) characteristics, remarkable stability, low toxicity, and tunable wavelengths [24]. Ti3C2 MQDs have demonstrated excitation-dependent photoluminescent spectra and impressive quantum yields (up to 9.9% [25]) [64]. Similarly, Nb2CTx QDs [48] have shown outstanding enzyme-responsive degradability, robust resistance to photobleaching, and remarkable stability [24].

4.1.3. Theranostic Applications

Theranostic applications combine therapeutic and diagnostic functions within a single platform [11]. Photothermal therapy (PTT) is a prominent approach in cancer and tumor treatment, leveraging the exceptional properties of MXenes (Figure 11 [68]). PTT employs photothermal agents accumulated within tumors to act as internal energy absorbers, converting NIR light energy into heat, leading to necrosis and/or apoptosis of cancer cells [24]. High photothermal performance has been observed in various studies, including in vivo and in vitro experiments, with materials such as Ti3C2, which is distinguished by its rapid light-to-heat conversion, Ta4C3, known for its excellent biocompatibility, high conversion efficiency (44.7%), and strong absorption band, and Nb2C, the latest addition, which shows high performance in both NIR-I and NIR-II biowindows. Moreover, Ti3C2 has been utilized in a synergistic therapy combining photothermal ablation with DOX-based chemotherapy, demonstrating outstanding stability, complete eradication of 4T1 cells without recurrence, and a drug encapsulation capacity of 84.2% [25]. Immunotherapy works by enhancing or activating the immune system to prevent or eliminate tumor cells. A 3D-printed Nb2CTx scaffold for breast cancer treatment showed promising results, but immunotherapy still requires additional therapeutic strategies (e.g., PTT and PDT) to achieve optimal outcomes [24].

4.1.4. Tissue Engineering

Tissue engineering aims to design and develop biological tissues to restore or regenerate functions lost due to disease or injury [69]. MXenes have been explored in various tissue engineering fields, including stem cell engineering [69], skin tissue engineering, nerve tissue engineering, and myocardial tissue engineering [64]. Research has shown that Ti3C2Tx enhances cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation in PLA scaffolds and promotes the production of cell spheroids [70], with both in vitro and in vivo tests highlighting their excellent biocompatibility [64]. Additionally, MXene/PLLA-PHA electrospun nanofibers [71] were found to improve the activity, growth, and osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs [70]. Ti3C2Tx has shown great promise in tissue engineering, particularly due to its functionalized conductive surface, which supports stem cell differentiation and enables precise photothermal stimulation of dorsal root ganglion neurons, facilitating the development of advanced neural therapy models [72]. Furthermore, Ti2C was used to develop bio-functional engineered cardiac patches (ECP) [73] that can repair myocardial infarction (MI) when applied to the natural heart. These patches demonstrated remarkable effectiveness in enhancing heart function, reducing infarct size, and alleviating inflammation [64]. Additionally, an MXene-reinforced PVA cryogel scaffold was developed for neural tissue engineering, successfully promoting PC-12 cell proliferation, neurite outgrowth, and reducing oxidative stress, showing strong potential for neural regeneration applications [74].
The suitability of MXenes for bone tissue engineering applications has also been investigated; a comprehensive overview of this specific topic can be found elsewhere [75].

4.1.5. Drug Delivery

The distinct 2D architecture and tunable physicochemical features of MXenes make them attractive candidates for targeted drug delivery. Among them, Ti3C2Tx stands out due to its ultrathin morphology, strong near-infrared responsiveness, effective photothermal properties, and adaptable surface chemistry. Despite these advantages, Ti3C2Tx-based carriers often exhibit limited drug-loading capacity and poor retention at target sites, leading to premature clearance and potential tissue damage. Similarly to other 2D inorganic materials, MXene-based systems also face stability issues under physiological conditions, complicating controlled drug release [70]. In order to overcome these challenges, integrating magnetic nanoparticles into MXene structures has been proposed, enabling external magnetic fields to guide and retain the drug carriers at the desired location, with drug release triggered by specific internal or external stimuli [76].
Recent studies have demonstrated the use of MXene-based systems, particularly Ti3C2Tx, for efficient drug delivery. For instance, a dual therapeutic agent (DOXjade), formed by linking DOX to a deferasirox derivative, was successfully loaded onto Ti3C2-PVP MXene, achieving high loading capacity of 210%, pH-triggered drug release of 5.3 with release time in a range from 0 to 72 h [77]. Other strategies involved functionalizing Ti3C2Tx with polymers like PEG or chitosan, or forming composites with Co nanowires (CoNWs) to enhance drug loading and ensure pH-responsive release, favoring drug liberation in acidic tumor environments, such as breast cancer, reaching loading and release efficiencies, respectively, up to 225% and 77%, with a release time of 24 h [78].

4.2. Electronic Applications

The remarkable and tunable electrical and electronic properties of MXenes position them as strong candidates for a wide range of electronic applications. This section highlights the most extensively studied and promising examples in this context.

4.2.1. Supercapacitors

Many features of MXenes make them promising candidates for the design of micro-supercapacitors (MSCs) and for use in high-precision integrated circuits (Figure 12 [79]). The morphology of MXenes plays a crucial role in determining their electrochemical performance. For instance, after etching the 3D bulk precursor, the material capacitance can be enhanced by the intercalation of water molecules within the layered structure, facilitated by the 2D slits. Additionally, water dielectric constant is key for shielding external electric fields. The small thickness of MXenes contributes to superior ion diffusion and further enhances capacitance. The functional groups of MXenes, along with their tunability, endow these materials with excellent energy density, acting as active sites that promote ion insertion and removal. As a result, MXene-based MSCs stand out for their excellent flexibility, high power density and voltage, compact dimensions, and remarkable durability [10]. To further enhance the performance of MXene-based supercapacitors, such as ion transfer and accessibility, composite materials have been developed by combining MXenes with organic polymers (also called conductive polymers or ICPs), metal oxides [43], metal hydroxides, and carbon materials [80]. The intercalation of these elements expands the interlayer spacing and minimizes MXene rearrangements [43]. Ti3C2Tix/ZnMnNi LDH van der Waals heterostructured electrodes [81] were produced through the combination of MXene and layered double hydroxides that showed a great capacitance of 2065 F/g at 5 mV/s and a capacitance retention rate of 99.8% after 100,000 cycles at 1 A/g [81]. Another notable example is the combination of graphene and MXene in a modified MXene/graphene oxide (MX-rHGO) film [79], which has demonstrated impressive volumetric capacitance (1445 F/cm3) at a scan rate of 2 mV/s, excellent mass loading, and outstanding durability, retaining 93% of its capacitance after 10,000 cycles at 5 A/g [81].

4.2.2. Perovskite Solar Cells

Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have shown great potential in the field of photovoltaic technology due to their low production cost and high efficiency [82]. Since the first studies on the application of MXenes in PSCs, dating back to 2018 [83], power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of these devices have reached values comparable to those of the most widely used silicon solar cells, up to 26%. Considering that this performance has been achieved in silicon cells over 70 years of research, perovskite solar cells are supposed to match and surpass them. PSCs are distinguished by their high-quality structure, which can be further enhanced through MXene additives, offering improved conductivity, reduced diffusion resistance, and tunable properties [82]. For example, the optoelectronic performance of (BA)2(MA)4Pb5I16 films has been improved by adding Ti3C2Tx nanosheets, achieving a PCE of 15.71% and a short-circuit current density of 20.87 mA/cm2 [84]. Other MXenes, such as Nb2CTx [85], V2CTx [62], and Mo2CTx [86], have also been studied for PSC applications, and further research is needed to identify additional effective additives [82]. Moreover, it is essential to optimize MXene production by developing more sustainable methods than HF etching, aiming to support mass production. Another aspect that warrants further investigation is the most efficient dosage of MXenes and the concentration of functional groups to maximize PSC performance, particularly in terms of stability, chemical compatibility, and durability [82].

4.2.3. Batteries

In the realm of energy storage, lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) stand out as highly effective devices, thanks to their exceptional specific capacities, impressive energy densities [87], and superior safety standards, surpassing even lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) [38]. MXene-based materials have proven to significantly enhance LSB performance due to their remarkable electrochemical properties. MXenes are extensively utilized in cathodes, interlayers, and separators, where they improve durability, enhance catalytic processes, support lithium polysulfide and Li2S kinetics, increase sulfur loading, and facilitate lithium anode hosting [87]. For example, Ti3C2Tx has been employed to coat separators, achieving an impressive capacity of 850.9 mAh/g with a sulfur loading of 2.8 mg/cm2 and maintaining a capacity retention of 89.66% [88].
Furthermore, Ti3C2Tx MXene has been applied in aqueous zinc metal batteries (ZMBs) as an electrolyte additive [89], effectively inhibiting Zn dendrite nucleation and growth—common issues that compromise battery efficiency or cause internal short circuits [38]. Additionally, high-purity V2CTx MXene, used as an anode in LIBs [90], has exhibited outstanding electrochemical performance (Figure 13) [91].
A hollow MoSe2@MXene composite was synthesized via a hydrothermal method by growing MoSe2 nanoflakes on hollow MXene spheres. This 3D structure, used as an anode in sodium-ion batteries, demonstrated excellent cycling stability and rate performance, delivering 350.7 mAh g⁻1 after 1000 cycles at 1 A g⁻1 with 93.7% retention. Its high performance is due to the synergistic effect between MoSe2 and MXene, which prevents material aggregation and improves sodium-ion transport [92]. A Sn4P3@MXene anode with a protective MXene shell enables inward expansion and stable cycling, delivering 302.1 mAh/g at 10 A/g and 94.9% retention over 1500 cycles. The full cell achieves 287.8 Wh/kg and 390.5 mAh/g after 500 cycles, highlighting its practical potential [93].
A PTCDA-based potassium-ion battery anode using MXene as an electrochemically active binder achieved 462 mAh/g at 50 mA/g, 116.3 mAh/g at 2000 mA/g, and excellent stability over 3000 cycles with only ~0.0033% capacity loss per cycle. The MXene/Super-P matrix improved conductivity suppressed PTCDA solubility, and enhanced K⁺ adsorption. The full cell reached 179.5 Wh/kg energy density, highlighting MXene’s role in enabling stable, high-performance organic PIBs [94]. The CNS@Ti3C2 composite, created by encapsulating Ti3C2 MXene with carbon nanospheres from carbon quantum dots, enhances potassium storage in PIBs. It delivers 229 mAh/g at 100 mA/g after 200 cycles and 205 mAh/g at 500 mA/g after 1000 cycles, with >99% coulombic efficiency, offering a promising approach for high-performance potassium-ion batteries [95].

4.3. Separation and Filtration Applications

MXenes offer significant potential in the design of membranes for separation applications thanks to their remarkable properties such as hydrophilicity, conductivity, and high flexibility (Figure 14) [96]. This section discusses some of the most valuable examples and provides a future outlook in this field.

4.3.1. Water Treatment

Over the years, MXenes have been engineered as functional membranes for water treatment and ion sieving due to their remarkable hydrophilicity and their overall negative charge. The surface functionalization of MXenes enhances their layered structure, improving permeability, enabling the separation of ions of different dimensions. The size-exclusion mechanism promotes the selection of ions smaller than the channels, while the Donnan exclusion method sieves negative ions, allowing only positive charges to permeate through electrochemical interactions with the net charge of MXenes [96]. An optimal MXene-based membrane should exhibit high water flux, excellent selectivity, and remarkable mechanical and chemical stability, particularly in resisting fouling [97]. In order to enhance fouling resistance, Ag nanoparticle-modified Ti3C2Tx (Ag@MXene) membranes have been developed [98], achieving impressive water flux (approximately 420 L m⁻2 h⁻1 bar⁻1), high rejection rates for bovine serum albumin (100%), methyl green (92.3%), and rhodamine B (RhB, 79.9%) [96]. Additionally, the combination of graphene oxide (GO) and Ti3C2Tx in a 90 nm thick membrane [99] has demonstrated significant performance in rejecting positively charged dye molecules with radii greater than 5 Å [100]. MXenes have gained attention as promising materials for seawater desalination and pollutant removal to address the global demand for freshwater [101]. A Ti3C2Tx-based membrane has achieved nearly 100% efficiency in NaCl separation, with water permeance reaching 85 L m⁻2 h⁻1 bar⁻1 at 65 °C [100]. Furthermore, Ti3C2 MXenes have been employed in photothermal water desalination under solar irradiation, leveraging their high light-to-heat conversion efficiency [102]. Regarding the antibacterial properties of MXene-based membranes, fresh Ti3C2Tx nanosheets [103] have shown a 73% antibacterial rate against Bacillus subtilis and 67% against Escherichia coli through direct contact damage. Upon air oxidation, these nanosheets can inhibit bacterial growth by up to 99% [96].

4.3.2. Gas Separation

Gas separation technologies are crucial for a wide range of industrial and environmental applications, such as H2 purification and CO2 capture [104], and are known for their low energy consumption, operational simplicity, and scalability [105]. Two-dimensional materials like MXenes are emerging as excellent alternatives to traditional polymer-based membranes due to their superior mechanical strength, layered structure, and tunable properties. The interlayer spacing and channel length of MXenes are key factors in determining their selectivity and performance in gas separation applications. In general, wider channels lead to improved permeability and selectivity [105]. Research has shown that Pd intercalation in MXene-based membranes [106] can enhance H2 permeability and H2/CO2 selectivity [105]. Additionally, an MXene/PEG mixed matrix membrane [107] was designed to enhance CO2 permeability for CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 separation [105]. The presence of functional groups and surface reactivity also plays a significant role in membrane performance: CO2, due to its quadrupole moment, can be easily absorbed by MXene interlayers, which facilitates effective H2/CO2 separation [104]. A recent study tested the permeability of He, H2, CO2, N2, and CH4 in C1_80 at room temperature and under different pressures, revealing that larger molecules like N2 and CO2 exhibit lower permeability compared to smaller ones such as He and H2, as illustrated in Figure 15 [104].
The effectiveness of gas separation can also be temperature-dependent. MXene-based membranes were tested for H2 selectivity at high temperatures (320 °C) over 200 h of continuous testing, with no significant changes in performance or structure. However, as the temperature increased, both permeability and selectivity decreased significantly, highlighting an area that requires further investigation [108].

5. Perspectives in 3D Printing

Additive manufacturing has revolutionized the production of advanced materials, improving their performance and unlocking new application opportunities [109,110]. Among emerging material classes, MXenes stand out for their exceptional properties. This section explores the latest advancements in MXene ink formulation and highlights various applications of 3D-printed MXene-based materials across different fields, providing insights into future developments.

5.1. Key Techniques in 3D Printing

3D printing marks a turning point in the vast array of manufacturing methods, offering numerous advantages in fabrication. Additive manufacturing is cost-effective, more sustainable due to reduced material waste, and highly scalable. Its versatility and flexibility allow for the design of complex shapes and structures without compromising product quality [1]. Additionally, it simplifies the production process through the use of design software like CAD, eliminating the need for highly skilled personnel or specialized facilities [111]. Three-dimensional printing can be divided in different techniques; the following is a brief overview of the most commonly used methods, highlighting their advantages and drawbacks.
Stereolithography (SLA) was the first 3D printing technique to be developed, dating back to the 1980s. It utilizes liquid photopolymer resins that are solidified layer by layer through photopolymerization induced by ultraviolet (UV) lasers, resulting in three-dimensional structures with high resolution [1], approximately up to 10 µm [112]. SLA is distinguished by its exceptional precision and rapid printing speeds [113], which can be further optimized. Ti3C2Tx MXene has been employed in an advanced SLA technology known as Continuous Liquid Interface Production (CLIP) as a photo-blocker. This application reduces light scattering in hydrogel-based aqueous inks, thereby enhancing printing accuracy [4]. However, SLA suffers from certain limitations, including high cost of the equipment compared to other printers [1] and poor mechanical properties in the final products, such as low specific stiffness and brittleness, which can compromise durability [114]. Despite these drawbacks, SLA supports a broad range of materials, including polymers, composites, ceramics, and metals [1].
Digital Light Processing (DLP) is the latest evolution of SLA and employs a digital light projector to cure liquid photopolymer resins in a vat, building objects layer by layer until fully solidified [4]. DLP is characterized by high accuracy and precision. However, printed objects often require additional cleaning processes to achieve optimal surface quality [4], and the technology faces limitations in producing large-scale structures [112]. Incorporating Ti3C2Tx MXenes into composite inks for DLP [115] has demonstrated improvements in both structural stability and electrical conductivity [4].
Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) is one of the most widely used 3D printing techniques. It involves the extrusion of molten thermoplastic filaments through a heated nozzle, which deposits material layer by layer [113] following a CAD-designed model [1]. A diverse array of thermoplastics, such as PET and PLA, can be utilized, that can often serve as a polymer matrix for composite materials, including those based on MXenes [1]. FDM is renowned for its versatility [113], user-friendliness, and cost-effectiveness [1], making it suitable for various applications ranging from prototype development [113] to the production of standard components [1]. Incorporating MXenes has been shown to significantly enhance the mechanical properties and EMI shielding performance of FDM-printed composites [4], such as recycled carbon fiber (rCF)-reinforced PLA [116]. Nonetheless, FDM has certain disadvantages, including the need for chemical cross-linkers and substantial heat energy input [114].
Selective laser sintering (SLS) is a technique that fabricates solid structures by sintering powdered materials using a high-energy laser [4], such as a carbon dioxide laser [114]. The laser melts and solidify the powder particles layer by layer, allowing for the creation of complex geometries with high resolution. However, post-processing treatments are often required to improve surface roughness [112]. SLS is compatible with a variety of thermoplastic polymers and metals, which can attain excellent mechanical strength [4] as well as glasses/ceramics [117]. This technology has been used to fabricate composite of Ti3C2 MXene and polyamide 12 (PA12) [118], resulting in a material with outstanding flame-retardant properties, including reductions in heat release, peak heat release, and total smoke emission by 18.5%, 26.1%, and 28.1%, respectively, along with improved tensile strength and durability [4].
Direct Ink Writing (DIW) is an extrusion-based technique that uses a nozzle or pen-like tip to deposit materials layer by layer. It accommodates a wide range of materials, particularly hydrogels and their composites, which are commonly used in applications such as tissue engineering, soft robotics, electrodes, and sensors [1,111]. DIW has also been used to process MXene-containing composites for example, Ti3C2Tx MXenes/PEDOT:PSS inks have been developed for DIW-based 3D printing of micro-supercapacitors (MSCs) [119]. While DIW offers the advantage of fabricating complex geometries with tunable mechanical properties and varying viscosities [1], it also presents challenges related to high manufacturing costs and extended production times [111].
A summary of additive manufacturing technologies is reported in Figure 16.

5.2. MXene-Based Inks for Additive Manufacturing

Ink is commonly defined as a liquid mixture containing colorants, such as pigments or dyes, used for writing, drawing, or printing. The rheological properties of inks play a crucial role in determining their suitability for various printing techniques. Each printing method requires specific ink characteristics to achieve the desired final products. Consequently, designing appropriate ink formulations and tailoring their properties represent the main challenges in these techniques [1]. Table 4 presents the reference ranges of key parameters for the most employed additive manufacturing techniques used with MXene-based inks, highlighting their potentially achievable resolutions; more details can be found in [122]. Inks typically include both organic and inorganic solvents to ensure optimal printability by adjusting viscosity, controlling moisture levels, and enhancing mechanical properties [1]. Solvents such as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), N-dimethylformamide (DMF), isopropyl alcohol, N, and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) are commonly used to facilitate the proper dispersion of MXene and to limit oxidation, which can compromise the ink stability and durability [111]. Additionally, small amounts of additives are often incorporated to enhance specific properties; for example, alkalis in water-based inks are used to adjust pH levels and improve durability [1]. However, the aim is to develop additive-free inks to simplify the printing process. In this regard, aqueous-based inks with varying concentrations of Ti3C2Tx thin layers, characterized by large lateral dimensions, have been formulated [123]. These inks exhibit optimal rheological properties, making them suitable for extrusion printing through a 250 µm diameter nozzle without the need for additives [111].
In recent years, MXenes and 2D materials have gained much attention in the field of 3D printing due to their exceptional properties, including high superficial conductivity, hydrophilicity, and outstanding rheological characteristics [1]. Additive manufacturing offers new opportunities for producing MXene-based structures with a high degree of precision and excellent performance in terms of flexibility, electrical conductivity, and mechanical robustness, capabilities that are difficult to achieve using traditional manufacturing methods. However, further research efforts are required to optimize MXenes for large-scale production through 3D printing techniques [1].
The remarkable hydrophilic nature of MXene nanosheets makes them highly suitable for dispersion in aqueous solvents. The main challenges associated with these solutions are oxidation and long-term stability [1]. This issue is worse at high temperatures, with prolongated light exposition, and in colloidal suspensions of single-layer or few-layer MXenes due to their high surface-to-volume ratio. Oxidation is commonly mitigated through refrigeration, storing MXene suspensions at 4 °C or lower, and by avoiding light exposure. Nevertheless, storage in organic solvents, such as ethanol, propylene carbonate (PC), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), has proven to be more effective in enhancing stability [124]. On the other hand, organic solvents implementation during ink formulation generates problems in terms of process sustainability. Aqueous-based inks represent a greener alternative, as their preparation does not involve the evaporation of toxic compounds (i.e., volatile organic compounds (VOC)) that can cause health and environmental risks, and they are more readily accessible [111]. In order to improve durability, antioxidant additives such as sodium L-ascorbate or polyanionic salts can be incorporated [97]. Furthermore, it has been observed that the concentration of MXenes in liquid-based inks significantly affects their stability, with more stable inks achieved at concentrations not exceeding 45 mg/mL [125].
The size of MXene sheets are another critical factor to consider when formulating inks, as many printing techniques have strict requirements regarding the maximum lateral size. This parameter plays a key role in determining the properties of MXenes: larger flakes exhibit higher electrical conductivity and greater UV-visible light absorption compared to smaller ones [125]. These characteristics are particularly important for applications in electronics and electromagnetic shielding.
As previously mentioned, the rheological properties of MXene-based inks are crucial for achieving high-quality printing and ensuring compatibility with specific techniques. Ink performance is influenced by the relationship between viscosity (η) and shear rate, as well as the G′/G″ ratio, where G′ represents the elastic modulus and G″ the viscous modulus (Figure 17) [126].
MXene-based inks with a concentration of approximately 300 mg/mL, an elastic modulus of ~104 Pa, and a shear yield stress of ~102 Pa have been identified as ideal candidates for FDM and DIW techniques. For instance, an MXene-based scaffold was successfully printed using the DIW method [127], achieving outstanding electrical conductivity (1013 S/m) and excellent EMI shielding performance. This was accomplished with an MXene water-based ink formulated with graphene oxide microgels [1].
In general, liquids exhibiting shear-thinning non-Newtonian (pseudoplastic) behavior are highly suitable for extrusion-based printing techniques [128]. Appropriate pseudoplastic and thixotropic properties enable inks to flow smoothly through printer nozzles while rapidly recovering their original viscosity, thus preserving the designed pattern. It has been demonstrated that increasing the concentration of MXenes leads to a corresponding increase in viscosity. Additionally, a high elastic modulus is essential to maintain the structural integrity of printed objects [124]. A study investigated the addition of 1.5 wt% 2D MXene to alumina ink for Direct Ink Writing (DIW). The MXene significantly improved the ink’s rheological properties, enhancing extrudability and shape fidelity by reducing the storage modulus and yield stress. The composite ink exhibited strong shear-thinning behavior and better viscosity recovery after high shear, enabling smoother extrusion, improved dimensional accuracy, and stable filament deposition during 3D printing [129]. Figure 18 illustrates the different rheological behaviors of single-layer and multi-layer MXenes, providing theoretical support for selecting the appropriate Ti3C2Tx concentration for various printing techniques [126].
Table 5 shows a selection of rheological parameters pertaining to both MXene-based inks and conventional ink formulations employed in additive manufacturing processes, along with an indication of their respective application domains; specific details can also be found in [130]. Among the various 3D printing methods, extrusion and inkjet techniques emerge as the most commonly employed for processing MXene-based inks.

5.3. Emerging Applications of 3D-Printed MXene-Based Materials

In this section, the applications of 3D-printed MXene-based materials will be discussed, highlighting their potential in various fields. This overview focuses on the most significant uses and the advantages they offer in each specific area with several examples and an outlook on future perspectives.

5.3.1. Biomedical Applications

The large surface area, conductivity, exceptional biocompatibility, and antibacterial properties of MXenes open promising perspectives for mimicking natural tissues and accelerating the regeneration of bone, neural, and cardiac tissues through the use of 3D printing, which opens new horizons in the field of biomaterials [142]. For instance, in vivo studies on nude mice and Sprague Dawley rats have demonstrated that integrating 2D Ti3C2 MXene with 3D-printed bioactive glass (BG) scaffolds effectively promotes tissue regeneration and induces bone tumor ablation via NIR irradiation. This is attributed to the exceptional photothermal conversion capability of MXene and the bone-regenerating properties of BG. As a result, the developed TBGS represents a promising approach for the postoperative treatment of osteosarcoma [143]. In vivo and in vitro studies of Ti3C2 MXene composite scaffolds produced through 3D printing extrusion techniques with remarkable biomimetic and mechanical properties, confirm promising performances in bone tissue regeneration, exhibiting high osteogenic and osteoblastic differentiation of BMSCs [144]. Furthermore, a bioink has been designed for 3D printing, combining human mesenchymal stem cell-laden hydrogels with MXene nanoparticles (GelMA/HAMA-MXene bioink) to facilitate bone regeneration, mimicking the natural extracellular matrix. This bioink exhibits outstanding physicochemical properties, including enhanced osteogenic activity and excellent cell adhesion, improving cell proliferation, and ultimately accelerating tissue regeneration [145].
The exceptional properties of MXenes have been utilized in the 3D and 4D printing of wearable biosensors. By combining the excellent conductivity and mechanical properties of MXenes with the versatility of additive manufacturing, these devices achieve enhanced performance in terms of sensitivity and responsiveness to external stimuli. For example, 3D-printed MXene-based biosensors are used for real-time monitoring of heartbeat, respiration, and pressure [4]. A wearable sensor was fabricated by printing an aqueous-based ink containing Ti3C2TX MXene onto a thin styrene–ethylene–butylene styrene (SEBS) substrate [146], resulting in a highly efficient triboelectric material. This sensor was applied for artery pressure detection, demonstrating high sensitivity (6 kPa⁻1) and requiring no external power source, as it was fully powered by human motion (Figure 19) [4].
Further research is needed to enhance processes scalability and to ensure enduring biocompatibility [142].

5.3.2. Electronic Applications

In recent years, the demand for micro-supercapacitors (MSCs) with high flexibility, energy density, and durability has steadily increased. Traditional manufacturing techniques are often impractical for large-scale production, and additive manufacturing is the perfect candidate to overcome this issue and further improve customization and the intrinsic properties of the final product [147]. Zhang et al. [131] developed an MSC by printing Ti3C2Tx aqueous ink onto porous hydrophilic paper, achieving an exceptional areal capacitance of 61 mF/cm2 at 25 µA/cm2 and 50 mF/cm2 at 800 µA/cm2, highlighting its potential for mass production via pad and cylindrical stamping [148]. Zhou et al. [149] successfully fabricated an MXene/CNF ink for energy storage and conversion applications. The incorporation of CNFs enhanced ink printability and rheological properties, mitigating MXene restacking and enabling the production of freestanding conductive structures. This ink was utilized for 3D printing a solid-state interdigitated SSC device, which demonstrated excellent volumetric capacitance and impressive rate performance, achieving, respectively, 2.02 F/cm2 at 1 mA/cm2 and 1.14 F/cm2 at 20 mA/cm2. Furthermore, it maintained 85% of its initial capacitance after 5000 cycles, indicating outstanding stability [149]. Optimizing ink rheology is essential for high-quality 3D-printed MSCs. While aqueous-based MXene inks and Ti3C2Tx organic inks, such as Ti3C2Tx-ethanol, are widely used in extrusion and inkjet printing for MSCs and ohmic resistors on flexible substrates, additive-free formulations remain highly desirable for simpler, more cost-effective, and efficient production (Figure 20) [147].
The field of portable electronics has been steadily expanding, driving an increasing demand for high-performance batteries to serve as reliable power sources. The primary goal is to develop batteries with outstanding mechanical properties, such as flexibility, alongside superior electrochemical characteristics, including high capacitance, remarkable energy densities, and minimal self-discharge rates [4]. MXenes have emerged as promising candidates for energy storage applications due to their unique properties. The integration of additive manufacturing and MXenes offers a cost-effective, scalable, and straightforward approach, such as 3D printing, to fabricate complex structures with customizable properties [124]. Among energy storage technologies, lithium-ion capacitors and batteries are the most extensively studied [4]. Zhang et al. [150] formulated Si/Ti3C2Tx (MX-C) and Ti3CNTx (MX-N) inks to fabricate composite electrodes for lithium-ion batteries. By coating a copper sheet with a mixture of nanoscale silicon powders (nSi), graphene-wrapped silicon (Gr-Si), and MXene, they achieved excellent rheological properties, reaching thicknesses of 650 µm for nSi and 2100 µm for Gr-Si, enabling high mass-loading. It was observed that a 30% MXene concentration in the silicon powder significantly enhanced conductivity. Additionally, the nSi/MX-C anode demonstrated stable charge/discharge performance over 280 cycles, whereas the nSi/MX-N anode exhibited inferior stability. Further research is required to enhance scalability and mitigate lithium dendrite formation, which can negatively impact battery performance [124].

5.3.3. Electromagnetic Shielding Applications

The increase in high-frequency circuits and wireless technologies has increased electromagnetic radiation, raising concerns about its interference with devices and effects on health [1]. Electromagnetic waves, capable of propagating through free space without a physical medium, facilitate long-distance communication by carrying electromagnetic energy [151]. However, they can cause signal disruptions, data loss, and hardware damage in electronic systems [1]. To eliminate these effects, high performance shielding materials are required to reflect, absorb, or dissipate electromagnetic energy [151]. MXenes have emerged as highly promising candidates for EMI shielding due to their exceptional electrical conductivity, mechanical flexibility, and durability making them an efficient solution for reducing electromagnetic radiation [1]. Additive manufacturing is an opportunity to improve MXenes’ performances through a simple and cost-effective method. Generally, 3D EMI shielding structures are printed via layered deposition techniques, fabricating high precision, porous, and internally isolated materials [151]. For instance, Liu et al. [152] developed a Ti3C2-MXene functionalized PEDOT:PSS aqueous-based ink optimized for additive manufacturing. This hydrogel exhibited excellent printability, high structural precision, and superior mechanical properties, including reversible stretchability and robustness. However, its most valuable features were its exceptional durability and conductivity. Combined with the porous structure and high water content of the hydrogel, these properties conferred remarkable EMI shielding capabilities even at reduced thicknesses. Potential applications for this material include energy storage, wearable miniaturized electronics, and water treatment technologies (Figure 20) [152]. Another notable example is a highly printable MXene/AlOOH ink designed for EMI shielding and EMI-thermochromic applications. Structures fabricated using DIW technology demonstrated excellent conductivity of 5323 S/m, tunable electromagnetic shielding effectiveness ranging from 25 dB to 80 dB in the X-band, and outstanding mechanical robustness, enabling them to support loads up to 3000 times their own weight. Additionally, thermochromic properties were achieved by integrating printed MG patterns with a thermochromic PDMS layer, allowing the structure to change color by converting electromagnetic energy into heat. These unique features open new possibilities for applications in warning labels and equipment for high-intensity EMI radiation environments (Figure 21) [151].

6. Conclusions

The advancements in 2D materials, particularly MXenes, have opened new avenues for scientific and technological progress. Their unique combination of electrical conductivity, mechanical strength, chemical stability, and surface tunability has positioned them as highly promising materials across various fields. From energy storage and water treatment to biomedical applications and electromagnetic shielding, MXenes have demonstrated exceptional versatility and functionality. A key development in this field is the integration of MXenes into 3D printing technologies. The ability to precisely control structure and composition through additive manufacturing has significantly expanded the potential applications of these materials. 3D-printed MXene-based materials exhibit enhanced performance in supercapacitors, batteries, and other electrochemical storage systems. This thesis has provided an in-depth analysis of the synthesis, properties, and applications of MXenes, with a particular focus on their role in 3D printing. The synergy between these advanced materials and additive manufacturing has the potential to revolutionize industries. However, challenges such as optimizing large-scale production, improving material stability, and, generally, refining processing techniques remain areas of active research. Future studies should aim to enhance the scalability and cost-effectiveness of MXene synthesis while exploring novel composite formulations to further improve their performance in different applications. The continuous evolution of MXene research, combined with advancements in 3D printing technologies, will undoubtedly drive their industrial adoption and contribute to the development of innovative, high-performance materials for energy, healthcare, and beyond.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.L.P. and F.B.; methodology, D.L.P. and F.B.; investigation, D.L.P. and F.B.; writing—original draft preparation, D.L.P.; writing—review and editing, F.B.; supervision, F.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research work received no funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable. No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Matias, M.L.; Pereira, C.; Almeida, H.V.; Jana, S.; Panigrahi, S.; Menda, U.D.; Nunes, D.; Fortunato, E.; Martins, R.; Nandy, S. 3D printed MXene architectures for a plethora of smart applications. Mater. Today Adv. 2024, 23, 100512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lokhande, P.E.; Pakdel, A.; Pathan, H.M.; Kumar, D.; Vo, D.-V.N.; Al-Gheethi, A.; Sharma, A.; Goel, S.; Singh, P.P.; Lee, B.-K. Prospects of MXenes in energy storage applications. Chemosphere 2022, 297, 134225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rahman, U.; Humayun, M.; Ghani, U.; Usman, M.; Ullah, H.; Khan, A.; El-Metwaly, N.M.; Khan, A. MXenes as Emerging Materials: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications. Molecules 2022, 27, 4909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bigham, A.; Zarepour, A.; Khosravi, A.; Iravani, S.; Zarrabi, A. 3D and 4D printing of MXene-based composites: From fundamen-tals to emerging applications. Mater. Horiz. 2024, 11, 6257–6288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Duan, X.; Wang, C.; Pan, A.; Yu, R.; Duan, X. Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides as atomically thin semiconduc-tors: Opportunities and challenges. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 8859–8876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shaheen, I.; Akkinepally, B.; Hussain, I.; Hussain, S.; Rosaiah, P.; Qureshi, A.; Niazi, J.H. Fabrication of MXene/cellulose composite-based flexible supercapacitor: Synthesis, properties, and future perspectives. J. Energy Storage 2024, 87, 111513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Naguib, M.; Mashtalir, O.; Carle, J.; Presser, V.; Lu, J.; Hultman, L.; Gogotsi, Y.; Barsoum, M.W. Two-dimensional transition metal carbides. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 1322–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Naguib, M.; Mochalin, V.N.; Barsoum, M.W.; Gogotsi, Y. 25th anniversary article: MXenes: A new family of two-dimensional materials. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 992–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Parwaiz, S.; Sohn, Y.; Khan, M.M. Insights into MXenes and MXene-based heterostructures for various photocatalytic applications. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2025, 186, 109099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, R.; Jang, W.Y.; Zhang, W.; Reddy, C.V.; Kakarla, R.R.; Li, C.; Gupta, V.K.; Shim, J.; Aminabhavi, T.M. Emerging two-dimensional (2D) MXene-based nanostructured materials: Synthesis strategies, properties, and applications as efficient pseudo-supercapacitors. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 472, 144913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Parajuli, D. MXenes-polymer nanocomposites for biomedical applications: Fundamentals and future perspectives. Front. Chem. 2024, 12, 1400375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gogotsi, Y.; Anasori, B. The rise of MXenes. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 8491–8494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Anasori, B.; Lukatskaya, M.R.; Gogotsi, Y. 2D metal carbides and nitrides (MXenes) for energy storage. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 16098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jun, B.M.; Kim, S.; Heo, J.; Park, C.M.; Her, N.; Jang, M.; Yoon, Y. Review of MXenes as new nanomaterials for energy storage/de-livery and selected environmental applications. Nano Res. 2019, 12, 471–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kurtoglu, M.; Naguib, M.; Gogotsi, Y.; Barsoum, M.W. First principles study of two- dimensional early transition metal carbides. Mrs Commun. 2012, 2, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, J.; Ding, Y.; Yan, D.; Huang, J.; Peng, S. Synthesis of MXene and its application for zinc-ion storage. SusMat 2022, 2, 293–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alhabeb, M.; Maleski, K.; Mathis, T.S.; Sarycheva, A.; Hatter, C.B.; Uzun, S.; Levitt, A.; Gogotsi, Y. Selective etching of silicon from Ti3SiC2 (MAX) to obtain 2D titanium carbide (MXene). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 5444–5448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Djire, A.; Zhang, H.; Liu, J.; Miller, E.M.; Neale, N.R. Electrocatalytic and Optoelectronic characteristics of the two-dimensional titanium nitride Ti4N3Tx MXene. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 11812–11823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Huang, L.; Hu, Z.; Jin, H.; Wu, J.; Liu, K.; Xu, Z.; Wan, J.; Zhou, H.; Duan, J.; Hu, B.; et al. Salt-assisted synthesis of 2D materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1908486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, M.; Lu, J.; Luo, K.; Li, Y.; Chang, K.; Chen, K.; Zhou, J.; Rosen, J.; Hultman, L.; Eklund, P.; et al. Element replacement approach by reaction with Lewis acidic molten salts to synthesize nano-laminated MAX phases and MXenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 4730–4737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pang, S.-Y.; Wong, Y.-T.; Yuan, S.; Liu, Y.; Tsang, M.-K.; Yang, Z.; Huang, H.; Wong, W.-T.; Hao, J. Universal strategy for HF-free facile and rapid synthesis of two-dimensional MXenes as multifunctional energy materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 9610–9616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lukatskaya, M.R.; Halim, J.; Dyatkin, B.; Naguib, M.; Buranova, Y.S.; Barsoum, M.W.; Gogotsi, Y. Room-temperature carbide- derived carbon synthesis by electrochemical etching of MAX phases. Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 4977–4980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, C.; Wang, L.; Liu, Z.; Chen, L.; Guo, J.; Kang, N.; Ma, X.-L.; Cheng, H.-M.; Ren, W. Large-area high-quality 2D ultrathin Mo2C superconducting crystals. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 1135–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, H.; Fan, R.; Zou, B.; Yan, J.; Shi, Q.; Guo, G. Roles of MXenes in biomedical applications: Recent developments and prospects. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2023, 21, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lin, H.; Chen, Y.; Shi, J. Insights into 2D MXenes for Versatile Biomedical Applications: Current Advances and Challenges Ahead. Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1800518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mumtahina, M.; Khairul, H.; Nayeem, F.S.; Awais, A.S.; Abu, Z.M.; Mohammad, Y.; Saidur, R. MXene: A Roadmap to Sustainable Energy Management, Synthesis Routes, Stabilization, and Economic Assessment. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 32350–32393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rahman, M.; Al Mamun, M.S. Future prospects of MXenes: Synthesis, functionalization, properties, and application in field effect transistors. Nanoscale Adv. 2024, 6, 367–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bao, W.; Shen, H.; Zeng, G.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cui, D.; Xia, J.; Jing, K.; Liu, H.; Guo, C.; et al. Engineering the next generation of MXenes: Challenges and strategies for scalable production and enhanced performance. Nanoscale 2025, 17, 6204–6265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Guo, Y.; Zhang, X.; Jin, S.; Xia, Q.; Chang, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhou, A. Synthesis of Mo2C MXene with high electrochemical performance by alkali hydrothermal etching. J. Adv. Ceram. 2023, 10, 1889–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Huang, Z.; Qin, J.; Zhu, Y.; He, K.; Chen, H.; Hoh, H.Y.; Batmunkh, M.; Benedetti, T.M.; Zhang, Q.; Su, C.; et al. Green and scalable electrochemical routes for cost-effective mass production of MXenes for supercapacitor electrodes. Carbon Energy 2023, 5, e295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gong, S.; Zhao, F.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, H.; Li, M.; Qi, J.; Wang, H.; Wang, Z.; Hu, Y.; Fan, X.; et al. Few-layered Ti3C2Tx MXene synthesized via water-free etching toward high-performance supercapacitors. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 632 Pt A, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ahmed, B.; Hossain, M.J.; Al Parvez, A.; Talukder, A.; Al-Amin, M.; Al Mahmud, M.A.; Islam, T. Recent Advancements of MXene/Nanocellulose-Based Hydrogel and Aerogel: A Review. Adv. Energy Sustain. Res. 2024, 5, 2300231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jawaid, A.; Hassan, A.; Neher, G.; Nepal, D.; Pachter, R.; Kennedy, W.J.; Ramakrishnan, S.; Vaia, R.A. Halogen Etch of Ti3AlC2 MAX Phase for MXene Fabrication. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 2771–2777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chan, K.C.; Guan, X.; Zhang, T.; Lin, K.; Huang, Y.; Lei, L.; Georgantas, Y.; Gogotsi, Y.; Bissett, M.A.; Kinloch, I.A. The fabrication of Ti3C2 and Ti3CN MXenes by electrochemical etching. J. Mater. Chem. A 2024, 12, 25165–25175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sun, Z.; Yuan, M.; Lin, L.; Yang, H.; Nan, C.; Li, H.; Sun, G.; Yang, X. Selective lithiation–expansion microexplosion synthesis of two-dimensional fluoride-free Mxene. ACS Mater. Lett. 2019, 1, 628–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lokhande, P.E.; Rednam, U.; Kadam, V.; Jagtap, C.; Kumar, D.; Aepuru, R. Microwave assisted synthesis of Ti3C2-MXene for supercapacitor application. Chem. Commun. 2025, 61, 2111–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ullah, S.; Najam, T.; Rehman, A.U.; Alarfaji, S.S.; Ahmad, M.A.; Riaz, S.; Akkinepally, B.; Shah, S.S.A.; Nazir, M.A. MXene nano-materials: Synthesis, properties and applications in energy and environment sector. J. Alloys Compd. 2024, 1001, 175172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kamarulazam, F.; Bashir, S.; Ramesh, S.; Ramesh, K. Emerging trends towards MXene-based electrolytes for electrochemical applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2023, 290, 116355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Khazaei, M.; Ranjbar, A.; Arai, M.; Yunoki, S. Topological insulators in the ordered double transition metals M 2′ M″C2 MXenes (M′ = Mo, W; M″ = Ti, Zr, Hf). Phys. Rev. B 2016, 94, 125152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhan, X.; Si, C.; Zhou, J.; Sun, Z. MXene and MXene-based composites: Synthesis, properties and environment-related applications. Nanoscale Horiz. 2020, 5, 235–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, X.; Zhao, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Xiong, J.; Yu, J. MXene/polymer nanocomposites: Preparation, properties, and applications. Polym. Rev. 2021, 61, 80–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Huang, S.; Mochalin, V.N. Hydrolysis of 2D transition-metal carbides (MXenes) in colloidal solutions. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 1958–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Otgonbayar, Z.; Yang, S.; Kim, I.-J.; Oh, W.-C. Recent advances in two-dimensional MXene for supercapacitor applications: Progress, challenges, and perspectives. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Akhter, R.; Maktedar, S.S. MXenes: A comprehensive review of synthesis, properties, and progress in supercapacitor applications. J. Mater. 2023, 9, 1196–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, B.; Wong, P.W.; Guo, J.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, Y.; Sun, J.; Jiang, M.; Wang, Z.; Kyoungjin An, A. Transforming Ti3C2Tx MXene’s intrinsic hydrophilicity into superhydrophobicity for efficient photothermal membrane desalination. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rasool, K.; Pandey, R.P.; Rasheed, P.A.; Buczek, S.; Gogotsi, Y.; Mahmoud, K.A. Water treatment and environmental remediation applications of two-dimensional metal carbides (MXenes). Mater. Today 2019, 30, 80–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Berdiyorov, G.R. Optical properties of functionalized Ti3C2T2 (T = F, O, OH) MXene: First-principles calculations. AIP Adv. 2016, 6, 055105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Shan, Q.; Mu, X.; Alhabeb, M.; Shuck, C.E.; Pang, D.; Zhao, X.; Chu, X.-F.; Wei, Y.; Du, F.; Chen, G. Two-dimensional vanadium carbide (V2C) MXene as electrode for supercapacitors with aqueous electrolytes. Electrochem. Commun. 2018, 96, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, Y.; Li, C.; Han, X.; Liu, D.; Zhao, H.; Li, Z.; Xu, P.; Du, Y. Ultrasmall Mo2C Nanoparticle-Decorated Carbon Polyhedrons for Enhanced Microwave Absorption. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2018, 1, 5366–5376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhao, J.; Ma, N.; Wang, T.; Wang, Y.; Liang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, S.; Xiong, Y.; Wang, Q.; Fan, J. Theoretical insights and design of MXene for aqueous batteries and supercapacitors: Status, challenges, and perspectives. Nanoscale Horiz. 2025, 10, 78–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lukatskaya, M.R.; Kota, S.; Lin, Z.; Zhao, M.-Q.; Shpigel, N.; Levi, M.D.; Halim, J.; Taberna, P.-L.; Barsoum, M.W.; Simon, P. Ultra-high-rate pseudocapacitive energy storage in two-dimensional transition metal carbides. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 17105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, Z.; Yao, Z.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, Z. 2D Carbide MXene under postetch low-temperature annealing for high–performance supercapacitor electrode. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 359, 136960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hou, M.; Xu, M.; Hu, Y.; Li, B. Fabrication of hybrid tin oxide-cellulose nanocomposite as the flexible and thin supercapacitor. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 313, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Geng, X.; Zhang, Y.; Han, Y.; Li, J.; Yang, L.; Benamara, M.; Chen, L.; Zhu, H. Two-Dimensional Water-Coupled Metallic MoS2 with Nanochannels for Ultrafast Supercapacitors. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 1825–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Naguib, M.; Kurtoglu, M.; Presser, V.; Lu, J.; Niu, J.; Heon, M.; Hultman, L.; Gogotsi, Y.; Barsoum, M.W. Two-dimensional nanocrystals produced by exfoliation of Ti3AlC2. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 4248–4253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yang, X.; Feng, M.H.; Xia, J.F.; Zhang, F.F.; Wang, Z.H. An electrochemical biosensor based on AuNPs/Ti3C2 MXene three-dimensional nanocomposite for microRNA-155 detection by exonuclease III-aided cascade target recycling. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020, 878, 114669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lukatskaya, M.R.; Mashtalir, O.; Ren, C.E.; Dall’Agnese, Y.; Rozier, P.; Taberna, P.L.; Naguib, M.; Simon, P.; Barsoum, M.W.; Gogotsi, Y. Cation intercalation and high volumetric capacitance of two-dimensional titanium carbide. Science 2013, 341, 1502–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Murali, A.; Lokhande, G.; Deo, K.A.; Brokesh, A.; Gaharwar, A.K. Emerging 2D Nanomaterials for Biomedical Applications. Mater. Today 2021, 50, 276–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kohestani, A.A.; Xu, Z.; Baştan, F.E.; Boccaccini, A.R.; Pishbin, F. Electrically conductive coatings in tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2024, 186, 30–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mayerberger, E.A.; Street, R.M.; McDaniel, R.M.; Barsoum, M.W.; Schauer, C.L. Antibacterial properties of electrospun Ti3C2Tz (MXene)/chitosan nanofibers. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 35386–35394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chen, K.; Chen, Y.; Deng, Q.; Jeong, S.H.; Jang, T.S.; Du, S.; Kim, H.E.; Huang, Q.; Han, C.M. Strong and biocompatible poly(lactic acid) membrane enhanced by Ti3C2Tz (MXene) nanosheets for Guided bone regeneration. Mater. Lett. 2018, 229, 114–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bilal, M.; Singh, A.K.; Iqbal, H.M.N.; Boczkaj, G. Enzyme-conjugated MXene nanocomposites for biocatalysis and biosensing. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 474, 145020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Barman, S.C.; Jin, Y.; El-Demellawi, J.K.; Thomas, S.; Wehbe, N.; Lei, Y.; Hota, M.K.; Xu, X.; Hasan, E.A.; Mohammed, O.F.; et al. Antibody-functionalized MXene-based electrochemical biosensor for point-of-care detection of vitamin D deficiency. Commun. Mater. 2025, 6, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Huang, J.; Li, Z.; Mao, Y.; Li, Z. Progress and biomedical applications of MXenes. Nano Select 2021, 2, 1480–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Iravani, S.; Varma, R.S. MXenes and MXene-based materials for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: Recent advances. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 2906–2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Dai, C.; Chen, Y.; Jing, X.X.; Xiang, L.H.; Yang, D.Y.; Lin, H.; Liu, Z.; Han, X.X.; Wu, R. Two-Dimensional Tantalum Carbide (MXenes) Composite Nanosheets for Multiple Imaging-Guided Photothermal Tumor Ablation. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 12696–12712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yang, G.H.; Zhao, J.L.; Yi, S.Z.; Wan, X.J.; Tang, J.N. Biodegradable and photostable Nb2C MXene quantum dots as promising nanofluorophores for metal ions sensing and fluorescence imaging. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 309, 127735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Fang, Z.; Chen, J.; Pan, J.; Liu, G.; Zhao, C. The Development Tendency of 3D-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds for Applications Ranging From Bone Tissue Regeneration to Bone Tumor Therapy. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 754266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Garg, R.; Vitale, F. Latest advances on MXenes in biomedical research and health care. MRS Bull. 2023, 48, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Koyappayil, A.; Chavan, S.G.; Roh, Y.-G.; Lee, M.-H. Advances of MXenes; Perspectives on Biomedical Research. Biosensors 2022, 12, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Huang, R.; Chen, X.; Dong, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wei, Y.; Yang, Z.; Li, W.; Guo, Y.; Liu, J.; Yang, Z.; et al. MXene Composite Nanofibers for Cell Culture and Tissue Engineering. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2020, 3, 2125–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Liao, M.; Cui, Q.; Hu, Y.; Xing, J.; Wu, D.; Zheng, S.; Zhao, Y.; Yu, Y.; Sun, J.; Chai, R. Recent advances in the application of MXenes for neural tissue engineering and regeneration. Neural Regen. Res. 2024, 19, 258–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ye, G.; Wen, Z.; Wen, F.; Song, X.; Wang, L.; Li, C.; He, Y.; Prakash, S.; Qiu, X. Mussel-inspired conductive Ti2C-cryogel promotes functional maturation of cardiomyocytes and enhances repair of myocardial infarction. Theranostics 2020, 10, 2047–2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zoughaib, M.; Avdokushina, S.; Savina, I.N. MXene-Reinforced Composite Cryogel Scaffold for Neural Tissue Repair. Molecules 2025, 3, 479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Khodabandehloo, A.H.; Pourmadadi, M.; Shamsabadipour, A.; Langari, H.; Manicum, A.L.; Rahdar, A.; Baino, F. Two-dimensional materials for bone-tissue engineering. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2023, 106, 5111–5132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhang, P.; Yang, X.-J.; Li, P.; Zhao, Y.; Niu, Q.J. Fabrication of novel MXene(Ti3C2)/polyacrylamide nanocomposite hydrogels with enhanced mechanical and drug release properties. Soft Matter 2020, 16, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Xu, Y.; Wang, Y.; An, J.; Sedgwick, A.C.; Li, M.; Xie, J.; Hu, W.; Kang, J.; Sen, S.; Steinbrueck, A.; et al. 2D-ultrathin MXene/DOXjade platform for iron chelation chemo-photothermal therapy. Bioact. Mater. 2022, 14, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Liu, Y.; Han, Q.; Yang, W.; Gan, X.; Yang, Y.; Xie, K.; Xie, L.; Deng, Y. Two dimensional MXene/cobalt nanowire heterojunction for controlled drug delivery and chemo-photothermal therapy. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 116, 111212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Fan, Z.; Wang, Y.; Xie, Z.; Wang, D.; Yuan, Y.; Kang, H.; Su, B.; Cheng, Z.; Liu, Y. Modified MXene/Holey Graphene Films for Advanced Supercapacitor Electrodes with Superior Energy Storage. Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1800750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Guo, L.; Jiang, W.Y.; Shen, M.; Xu, C.; Ding, C.X.; Zhao, S.F.; Yuan, T.T.; Wang, C.Y.; Zhang, X.Q.; Wang, J.Q. High capacitance of MXene (Ti3C2Tx) through Intercalation and Surface Modification in Molten Salt. Electrochim. Acta 2022, 401, 139476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sun, C.; Zuo, P.; Sun, W.; Xia, R.; Dong, Z.; Zhu, L.; Lv, J.; Deng, G.; Tan, L.; Dai, Y. Self-assembly of alternating stacked 2D/2D Ti3C2Tx MXene/ZnMnNi LDH van der Waals heterostructures with ultrahigh supercapacitive performance. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3, 10242–10254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Z.; Peng, B.; Tran, N.Q.; Saxena, K.K.; Vadivel, S.; Liu, X. MXene-based materials for efficient applications in perovskite solar cells: A review. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2025, 215, 214–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yang, L.; Li, P.; Ma, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, X.-F.; Liu, Y. MXenes for perovskite solar cells: Progress and prospects. J. Energy Chem. 2023, 81, 443–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Jin, X.; Yang, L.; Wang, X.-F. Efficient Two-Dimensional Perovskite Solar Cells Realized by Incorporation of Ti3C2Tx MXene as Nano-Dopants. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021, 113, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhang, J.; Huang, C.; Yu, H. Modulate the work function of Nb2CTx MXene as the hole transport layer for perovskite solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2021, 119, 033506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hussain, S.; Liu, H.; Vikraman, D.; Hussain, M.; Jaffery, S.H.A.; Ali, A.; Kim, H.-S.; Kang, J.; Jung, J. Characteristics of Mo2C-CNTs hybrid blended hole transport layer in the perovskite solar cells and X-ray detectors. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 885, 161039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Rehman, Z.U.; Khan, K.; Yao, S.; Nawaz, M.; Miotello, A.; Assiri, M.A.; Bashir, T.; Tamang, T.L.; Javed, M.S. Recent progress in MXene-based materials, synthesis, design, and application in lithium-sulfur batteries. Mater. Today Chem. 2024, 40, 102200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Song, J.; Su, D.; Xie, X.; Guo, X.; Bao, W.; Shao, G.; Wang, G. Immobilizing polysulfides with MXene-functionalized separators for stable lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 29427–29433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Enyashin, A.N.; Ivanovskii, A.L. Structural and electronic properties and stability of MXenes Ti2C and Ti3C2 functionalized by methoxy groups. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 13637–13643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wang, L.; Liu, D.; Lian, W.; Hu, Q.; Liu, X.; Zhou, A. The preparation of V2CTx by facile hydrothermal-assisted etching processing and its performance in lithium-ion battery. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 984–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ampong, D.N.; Agyekum, E.; Agyemang, F.O.; Mensah-Darkwa, K.; Andrews, A.; Kumar, A.; Gupta, R.K. MXene: Fundamentals to applications in electrochemical energy storage. Discov. Nano 2023, 18, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Zou, H.; Li, S.; Yang, W.; Liu, Q.; Chen, S. Synthesis of a hollow MoSe2@MXene anode material for sodium-ion batteries. Nanoscale 2025, 17, 9480–9489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Fan, W.; Gao, Y.; Hui, Q.; Ma, Z.; Gan, H.; Xia, X.; Liu, H. A closed-ended MXene armor on hollow Sn4P3 nanospheres for ultrahigh-rate and stable sodium storage. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 465, 142963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhou, S.; Zhang, P.; Li, Y.; Feng, L.; Xu, M.; Soomro, R.A.; Xu, B. Ultrastable Organic Anode Enabled by Electrochemically Active MXene Binder toward Advanced Potassium Ion Storage. ACS Nano 2024, 18, 16027–16040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Feng, Y.; Wu, K.; Wu, S.; Guo, Y.; He, M.; Xue, M. Carbon Quantum Dots-Derived Carbon Nanosphere Coating on Ti3C2 MXene as a Superior Anode for High-Performance Potassium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 3077–3088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Huang, L.; Ding, L.; Wang, H. MXene-Based Membranes for Separation Applications. Small Sci. 2021, 1, 2100013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Tunesi, M.M.; Soomro, R.A.; Han, X.; Zhu, Q.; Wei, Y.; Xu, B. Application of MXenes in environmental remediation technologies. Nano Converg. 2021, 8, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Pandey, R.P.; Rasool, K.; Madhavan, V.E.; Aissa, B.; Gogotsi, Y.; Mahmoud, K.A. Ultrahigh-flux and fouling-resistant membranes based on layered silver/MXene (Ti3C2Tx) nanosheets. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 3522–3533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kang, K.M.; Kim, D.W.; Ren, C.E.; Cho, K.M.; Kim, S.J.; Choi, J.H.; Nam, Y.T.; Gogotsi, Y.; Jung, H.-T. Selective Molecular Separation on Ti3C2Tx-Graphene Oxide Membranes during Pressure-Driven Filtration: Comparison with Graphene Oxide and MXenes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 44687–44694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Meskher, H.; Thakur, A.K.; Hazra, S.K.; Ahamed, M.S.; Saleque, A.M.; Alsalhy, Q.F.; Shahzad, M.W.; Al Subri Ivan, M.N.; Saha, S.; Lynch, I. Recent advances in applications of MXenes for desalination, water purification and as an antibacterial: A review. Environ. Sci. Nano 2025, 12, 1012–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zaed, M.A.; Saidur, R.; Pandey, A.K.; Kadhom, M.; Tan, K.H.; Cherusseri, J.; Abdullah, N. Utilization of recycled materials for low-cost MXene synthesis and fabrication of graphite/MXene composite for enhanced water desalination performance. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 354, 129055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Li, R.; Zhang, L.; Shi, L.; Wang, P. MXene Ti3C2: An Effective 2D Light-to-Heat Conversion Material. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 3752–3759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Rasool, K.; Helal, M.; Ali, A.; Ren, C.E.; Gogotsi, Y.; Mahmoud, K.A. Antibacterial Activity of Ti3C2Tx MXene. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 3674–3684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Emerenciano, A.A.; do Nascimento, R.M.; Barbosa, A.P.C.; Ran, K.; Meulenberg, W.A.; Gonzalez-Julian, J. Ti3C2 MXene Mem-branes for Gas Separation: Influence of Heat Treatment Conditions on D-Spacing and Surface Functionalization. Membranes 2022, 12, 1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Qiu, X.; Zheng, Y.; Li, H.; Qu, K.; Yan, H.; Li, R. Unveiling gas transport mechanisms in tunable MXene nanochannels: Insights from molecular dynamics simulations. J. Membr. Sci. 2025, 715, 123459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wang, Q.; Fan, Y.; Wu, C.; Jin, Y.; Li, C.; Sunarso, J.; Meng, X.; Yang, N. Palladium-intercalated MXene membrane for efficient separation of H2/CO2: Combined experimental and modeling work. J. Membr. Sci. 2022, 653, 120533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Luo, W.; Niu, Z.; Mu, P.; Li, J. MXene/poly(ethylene glycol) mixed matrix membranes with excellent permeance for highly efficient separation of CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022, 640, 128481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Fan, Y.; Wei, L.; Meng, X.; Zhang, W.; Yang, N.; Jin, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhao, M.; Liu, S. An unprecedented high-temperature-tolerance 2D laminar MXene membrane for ultrafast hydrogen sieving. J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 569, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Kanishka, K.; Acherjee, B. Revolutionizing manufacturing: A comprehensive overview of additive manufacturing processes, materials, developments, and challenges. J. Manuf. Process. 2023, 107, 574–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zhou, L.; Miller, J.; Vezza, J.; Mayster, M.; Raffay, M.; Justice, Q.; Al Tamimi, Z.; Hansotte, G.; Sunkara, L.D.; Bernat, J. Additive- Manufacturing: A Comprehensive Review. Sensors 2024, 24, 2668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Maity, C.K.; De, S.; De Adhikari, A.; Kumari, A.; Verma, K.; Moniruzzaman, M.; Sahoo, S. Impact of 3D printed MXene electrodes on energy storage: Different dimensionalities, electrochemistry and performance optimization of printable MXene ink. Energy Storage Mater. 2024, 73, 103873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Han, T.; Kundu, S.; Nag, A.; Xu, Y. 3D Printed Sensors for Biomedical Applications: A Review. Sensors 2019, 19, 1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Iftekar, S.F.; Aabid, A.; Amir, A.; Baig, M. Advancements and Limitations in 3D Printing Materials and Technologies: A Critical Review. Polymers 2023, 15, 2519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Mohhammad, R.; Mohammed, S.; Sukhbir, S.; Abhijit, D. Three-Dimensional Hydrogel Bioprinting Technology as a Scaffold of Novel Drug Delivery and Biomedical Devices: A Comprehensive Review. BIO Web Conf. 2024, 86, 01013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Salas, A.; Pazniak, H.; Gonzalez-Julian, J.; Bianco, S.; Amici, J.; Ouisse, T.; Roppolo, I.; Cocuzza, M. Developing poly- meric/MXenes composite inks towards printable electronics. Composites 2023, 263 Pt B, 110854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Hu, Y.; Gu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, G.; Yi, X.; Liu, X. FDM 3D printed MXene/Recycled carbon fibre reinforced polylactic acid composites: Interface optimization, toughening and enhanced electromagnetic shielding performance. Compos. Commun. 2024, 48, 101953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Kolan, K.; Leu, M.C.; Hilmas, G.E.; Brown, R.F.; Velez, M. Fabrication of 13–93 bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering using indirect selective laser sintering. Biofabrication 2011, 3, 025004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Chen, L.; Huang, B.; Wei, F.; Guo, X.; Zhang, D.; Thummavichai, K.; Chen, D.; Wang, N.; Zhu, Y. Selective Laser Sintering of MXene-on-MOF (HKUST-1) Hybrids Enhanced Mechanical and Fire Safety Performances of Polyamide 12 Composites. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2023, 5, 9852–9864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Li, L.; Meng, J.; Bao, X.; Huang, Y.; Yan, X.P.; Qian, H.L.; Zhang, C.; Liu, T. Direct-ink-write 3D printing of programmable micro-supercapacitors from MXene-regulating conducting polymer inks. Adv. Energy Mater. 2023, 13, 2203683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Marczis, A.; Odrobina, M.; Drégelyi-Kiss, Á. Computed tomography as distortion mitigation method for selective laser sintering mass production. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2024, 133, 4845–4864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Nam, J.; Kim, M. Advances in materials and technologies for digital light processing 3D printing. Nano Converg. 2024, 11, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Huang, H.; Yang, W. MXene-Based Micro-Supercapacitors: Ink Rheology, Microelectrode Design and Integrated System. ACS Nano 2024, 18, 4651–4682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Orangi, J.; Hamade, F.; Davis, V.A.; Beidaghi, M. 3D Printing of Additive-Free 2D Ti3C2Tx (MXene) Ink for Fabrication of Micro-Supercapacitors with Ultra-High Energy Densities. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 640–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Zhang, Y.-Z.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, Q.; El-Demellawi, J.K.; Kim, H.; Alshareef, H.N. MXene Printing and Patterned Coating for Device Applications. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1908486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Seok, S.-H.; Choo, S.; Kwak, J.; Ju, H.; Han, J.-H.; Kang, W.-S.; Lee, J.; Kim, S.-Y.; Lee, D.H.; Lee, J.; et al. Synthesis of high quality 2D carbide MXene flakes using a highly purified MAX precursor for ink applications. Nanoscale Adv. 2021, 3, 517–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Greaves, M.; Mende, M.; Wang, J.; Yang, W.; Barg, S. Investigating the rheology of 2D titanium carbide (MXene) dispersions for colloidal processing: Progress and challenges. J. Mater. Res. 2021, 36, 4578–4600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Dai, Y.; Wu, X.; Li, L.; Zhang, Y.; Deng, Z.; Yu, Z.-Z.; Zhang, H.-B. 3D printing of resilient, lightweight and conductive MXene/reduced graphene oxide architectures for broadband electromagnetic interference shielding. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. 2022, 10, 11375–11385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Fagade, M.; Patil, D.; Thummalapalli, S.V.; Jambhulkar, S.; Ravichandran, D.; Kannan, A.M.; Song, K. 3D printing aqueous Ti3C2Tx inks for MXene-based energy devices. Mater. Adv. 2023, 4, 4103–4109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Mamanazirov, J.I.; Ruzimuradov, O.N.; Mamatkulov, S.I. The impact of 2D MXene on alumina based inks for direct ink writing. Ceram. Int. 2025, 51, 15725–15732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Nouseen, S.; Pumera, M. MXene 3D/4D Printing: Ink Formulation and Electrochemical Energy Storage Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 35, 2421987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Zhang, C.; Kremer, M.P.; Seral-Ascaso, A.; Park, S.-H.; McEvoy, N.; Anasori, B.; Gogotsi, Y.; Nicolosi, V. Stamping of Flexible, Coplanar Micro-Supercapacitors Using MXene Inks. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1705506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Sharma, C.S. Rout, Two-Dimensional MXene Based Materials for Micro-Supercapacitors. Supercapacitors Next Gener. 2021, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Yu, L.; Fan, Z.; Shao, Y.; Tian, Z.; Sun, J.; Liu, Z. Versatile N-Doped MXene Ink for Printed Electrochemical Energy Storage Application. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1901839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Li, H.; Li, X.; Liang, J.; Chen, Y. Hydrous RuO2-Decorated MXene Coordinating with Silver Nanowire Inks Enabling Fully Printed Micro-Supercapacitors with Extraordinary Volumetric Performance. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1803987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Yang, W.; Yang, J.; Byun, J.J.; Moissinac, F.P.; Xu, J.; Haigh, S.J.; Domingos, M.; Bissett, M.A.; Dryfe, R.A.W.; Barg, S. 3D Printing of Freestanding MXene Architectures for Current-Collector-Free Supercapacitors. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1902725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Cho, S.; Kim, M.; Jang, J. Screen-Printable and Flexible RuO2 Nanoparticle-Decorated PEDOT:PSS/Graphene Nanocomposite with Enhanced Electrical and Electrochemical Performances for High-Capacity Supercapacitor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 10213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Shen, K.; Ding, J.; Yang, S. 3D Printing Quasi-Solid-State Asymmetric Micro-Supercapacitors with Ultrahigh Areal Energy Density. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1800408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Fu, K.; Wang, Y.; Yan, C.; Yao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Dai, J.; Lacey, S.; Wang, Y.; Wan, J.; Li, T.; et al. Graphene Oxide-Based Electrode Inks for 3D-Printed Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 2587–2594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Hu, G.; Albrow-Owen, T.; Jin, X.; Ali, A.; Hu, Y.; Howe, R.C.T.; Shehzad, K.; Yang, Z.; Zhu, X.; Woodward, R.I.; et al. Black Phosphorus Ink Formulation for Inkjet Printing of Optoelectronics and Photonics. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. McManus, D.; Vranic, S.; Withers, F.; Sanchez-Romaguera, V.; Macucci, M.; Yang, H.; Sorrentino, R.; Parvez, K.; Son, S.-K.; Iannaccone, G.; et al. Water-based and Biocompatible 2D Crystal Inks for All-Inkjet Printed Hetero-structures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017, 12, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Li, J.; Naiini, M.M.; Vaziri, S.; Lemme, M.C.; Östling, M. Inkjet Printing of MoS2. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 6524–6531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Baino, F.; Fiume, E. 3D printing of hierarchical scaffolds based on mesoporous bioactive glasses (MBGs)-fundamentals and applications. Materials 2020, 13, 1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Pan, S.; Yin, J.; Yu, L.; Zhang, C.; Zhu, Y.; Gao, Y.; Chen, Y. 2D MXene-Integrated 3D-Printing Scaffolds for Augmented Osteosar-coma Phototherapy and Accelerated Tissue Reconstruction. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1901511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Mi, X.; Su, Z.; Fu, Y.; Li, S.; Mo, A. 3D printing of Ti3C2-MXene-incorporated composite scaffolds for accelerated bone regeneration. Biomed. Mater. 2022, 17, 035002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Lee, S.H.; Kang, M.S.; Jeon, S.; Jo, H.J.; Hong, S.W.; Kim, B.; Han, D. 3D bioprinting of human mesenchymal stem cells-laden hydrogels incorporating MXene for spontaneous osteodifferentiation. Heliyon 2023, 9, e14490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Yi, Q.; Pei, X.; Das, P.; Qin, H.; Lee, S.W.; Esfandyarpour, R. A self-powered triboelectric MXene-based 3D-printed wearable physiological biosignal sensing system for on-demand, wireless, and real-time health monitoring. Nano Energy 2022, 101, 107511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Zhang, C.; McKeon, L.; Kremer, M.P.; Park, S.-H.; Ronan, O.; Seral-Ascaso, A.; Barwich, S.; Coileáin, C.Ó.; McEvoy, N.; Nerl, H.C.; et al. Additive-free MXene inks and direct printing of micro-supercapacitors. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Bu, F.; Zhou, W.; Xu, Y.; Du, Y.; Guan, C.; Huang, W. Recent developments of advanced micro-supercapacitors: Design, fabrication and applications. npj Flex. Electron. 2020, 4, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Zhou, G.; Li, M.-C.; Liu, C.; Wu, Q.; Mei, C. 3D Printed Ti3C2Tx MXene/Cellulose Nanofiber Architectures for Solid-State Supercapacitors: Ink Rheology, 3D Printability, and Electrochemical Performance. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2109593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Zhang, C.J.; Park, S.-H.; Seral-Ascaso, A.; Barwich, S.; McEvoy, N.; Boland, C.S.; Coleman, J.N.; Gogotsi, Y.; Nicolosi, V. High capacity silicon anodes enabled by MXene viscous aqueous ink. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Wu, X.; Tu, T.; Dai, Y.; Tang, P.; Zhang, Y.; Deng, Z.; Li, L.; Zhang, H.-B.; Yu, Z.-Z. Direct Ink Writing of Highly Conductive MXene Frames for Tunable Electromagnetic Interference Shielding and Electromagnetic Wave-Induced Thermochromism. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021, 13, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Liu, J.; Mckeon, L.; Garcia, J.; Pinilla, S.; Barwich, S.; Möbius, M.; Stamenov, P.; Coleman, J.N.; Nicolosi, V. Additive Manufacturing of Ti3C2-MXene-Functionalized Conductive Polymer Hydrogels for Electromagnetic-Interference Shielding. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2106253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Etching method from MAX phases (reprinted from [7] with permission © 2012 ACS); (b) generation of different types of MXenes (reprinted from [8] with permission © 2014 Wiley).
Figure 1. (a) Etching method from MAX phases (reprinted from [7] with permission © 2012 ACS); (b) generation of different types of MXenes (reprinted from [8] with permission © 2014 Wiley).
Ceramics 08 00064 g001
Figure 2. (A) MAX phases; (B) MXenes result from etching MAX phases; (C) M, A, X elements (reprinted from [11] with CC license).
Figure 2. (A) MAX phases; (B) MXenes result from etching MAX phases; (C) M, A, X elements (reprinted from [11] with CC license).
Ceramics 08 00064 g002
Figure 3. Structures of: (i) M2X, (ii) M2X-1, (iii) M2X-2 for functionalized MXenes (reprinted from [14] with permission © 2019 Springer).
Figure 3. Structures of: (i) M2X, (ii) M2X-1, (iii) M2X-2 for functionalized MXenes (reprinted from [14] with permission © 2019 Springer).
Ceramics 08 00064 g003
Figure 4. Ti4N3Tx synthesis using molten salt of Ti4AlN3 powder under 550 °C and Ar gas (reprinted from [18] with permission © 2019 ACS).
Figure 4. Ti4N3Tx synthesis using molten salt of Ti4AlN3 powder under 550 °C and Ar gas (reprinted from [18] with permission © 2019 ACS).
Ceramics 08 00064 g004
Figure 5. Electrochemical etching of Ti2AlC in the HCl electrolyte (reprinted from [21] with permission © 2019 ACS).
Figure 5. Electrochemical etching of Ti2AlC in the HCl electrolyte (reprinted from [21] with permission © 2019 ACS).
Ceramics 08 00064 g005
Figure 6. Ti3C2Tx dispersibility in different solvents and evolution over time (reprinted from [43] with CC license).
Figure 6. Ti3C2Tx dispersibility in different solvents and evolution over time (reprinted from [43] with CC license).
Ceramics 08 00064 g006
Figure 7. Ti3C2Tx absorption spectra in (a) visible and (b) UV region (reprinted from [47] with CC license).
Figure 7. Ti3C2Tx absorption spectra in (a) visible and (b) UV region (reprinted from [47] with CC license).
Ceramics 08 00064 g007
Figure 8. Electronic structure of Ti3C2 MXene with −OH and −F termination as well as the “parent” form (no termination) (reprinted from [55] with permission © 2011 Wiley).
Figure 8. Electronic structure of Ti3C2 MXene with −OH and −F termination as well as the “parent” form (no termination) (reprinted from [55] with permission © 2011 Wiley).
Ceramics 08 00064 g008
Figure 9. (A) Ti3C2Tx microscopic layered structure; (B) cations intercalation process (reprinted from [57] with CC license).
Figure 9. (A) Ti3C2Tx microscopic layered structure; (B) cations intercalation process (reprinted from [57] with CC license).
Ceramics 08 00064 g009
Figure 10. Illustration of the most attractive examples of using of MXenes in the biomedical field. reprinted from [25] with CC license.
Figure 10. Illustration of the most attractive examples of using of MXenes in the biomedical field. reprinted from [25] with CC license.
Ceramics 08 00064 g010
Figure 11. Example of 3D-printed scaffold for bone tissue regeneration and tumor ablation (reprinted from [68] with CC license).
Figure 11. Example of 3D-printed scaffold for bone tissue regeneration and tumor ablation (reprinted from [68] with CC license).
Ceramics 08 00064 g011
Figure 12. (a) Production of the MXene/holey graphene film; (b) the impact of real mass loading on the volumetric capacitance of MXene film and MX-rHGO3; (c) capacitance maintenance of MX-rHGO3 at 5 A/g for 10,000 cycles; (d) gravimetric and (e) volumetric energy and watt densities of MX-rHGO3-based symmetric supercapacitors (reprinted from [79] with CC license).
Figure 12. (a) Production of the MXene/holey graphene film; (b) the impact of real mass loading on the volumetric capacitance of MXene film and MX-rHGO3; (c) capacitance maintenance of MX-rHGO3 at 5 A/g for 10,000 cycles; (d) gravimetric and (e) volumetric energy and watt densities of MX-rHGO3-based symmetric supercapacitors (reprinted from [79] with CC license).
Ceramics 08 00064 g012
Figure 13. Schematic illustration of a lithium-ion battery system (reprinted from [91] with CC license).
Figure 13. Schematic illustration of a lithium-ion battery system (reprinted from [91] with CC license).
Ceramics 08 00064 g013
Figure 14. A scheme of the benefits of MXene-based membranes for separation processes (reprinted from [96] with CC license).
Figure 14. A scheme of the benefits of MXene-based membranes for separation processes (reprinted from [96] with CC license).
Ceramics 08 00064 g014
Figure 15. Single gas permeabilities, permeances, and H2/CO2 selectivity at different pressures in C1_80 (reprinted from [104] with CC license).
Figure 15. Single gas permeabilities, permeances, and H2/CO2 selectivity at different pressures in C1_80 (reprinted from [104] with CC license).
Ceramics 08 00064 g015
Figure 16. Illustration of (a) Stereolithography (SLA), (b) Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), (c) Direct Ink Writing (DIW) [1], (d) Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) [120], (e) Digital Ligh Processing (DLP) (reprinted from [121] with CC license).
Figure 16. Illustration of (a) Stereolithography (SLA), (b) Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), (c) Direct Ink Writing (DIW) [1], (d) Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) [120], (e) Digital Ligh Processing (DLP) (reprinted from [121] with CC license).
Ceramics 08 00064 g016
Figure 17. Rheological properties of Ti3C2Tx MXene water-based ink at different concentrations: (a) relationship between shear stress and G′ and G″ moduli, (b) and between shear rate and viscosity (reproduced from [126] with CC license).
Figure 17. Rheological properties of Ti3C2Tx MXene water-based ink at different concentrations: (a) relationship between shear stress and G′ and G″ moduli, (b) and between shear rate and viscosity (reproduced from [126] with CC license).
Ceramics 08 00064 g017
Figure 18. The frequency-dependent behavior of the ratio between the elastic modulus (G′) and the viscous modulus (G″) for 0.18–3.60 mg/mL multi-layer (a) and single-layer (b) Ti3C2Tx MXene in water related to different printing methods (reprinted from [126] with CC license).
Figure 18. The frequency-dependent behavior of the ratio between the elastic modulus (G′) and the viscous modulus (G″) for 0.18–3.60 mg/mL multi-layer (a) and single-layer (b) Ti3C2Tx MXene in water related to different printing methods (reprinted from [126] with CC license).
Ceramics 08 00064 g018
Figure 19. Illustration of MXene-based 3D printed wearable sensor for pressure monitoring and its production process (reprinted from [4] with permission © 2024 RSC).
Figure 19. Illustration of MXene-based 3D printed wearable sensor for pressure monitoring and its production process (reprinted from [4] with permission © 2024 RSC).
Ceramics 08 00064 g019
Figure 20. Schematic representation of direct printing of MXene ink (reprinted from [147] with CC license).
Figure 20. Schematic representation of direct printing of MXene ink (reprinted from [147] with CC license).
Ceramics 08 00064 g020
Figure 21. (a) Fabrication of a freestanding MG frame, (b) 3D printed MG cubic structure and ‘woodpile’ microlattice featuring (c) double split rings; (d) the design of EMI shields in electronic devices, (e) adaptive hemispherical framework created using DIW printing (reproduced from [151] with CC license; (f) demonstration of the reachable complex shapes of 3D printed MXene-based hydrogels (reprinted from [152] with permission © 2022 Wiley).
Figure 21. (a) Fabrication of a freestanding MG frame, (b) 3D printed MG cubic structure and ‘woodpile’ microlattice featuring (c) double split rings; (d) the design of EMI shields in electronic devices, (e) adaptive hemispherical framework created using DIW printing (reproduced from [151] with CC license; (f) demonstration of the reachable complex shapes of 3D printed MXene-based hydrogels (reprinted from [152] with permission © 2022 Wiley).
Ceramics 08 00064 g021
Table 1. Advantages and drawbacks of different types of MXene synthesis.
Table 1. Advantages and drawbacks of different types of MXene synthesis.
Synthesis StrategiesReagentsMorphology MeritsDemerits
HF etching [16,17]HFAccordion-like structure with abundant -F terminations and defects1. Effective for most MAX
2. High yield
1. Dangerous operation 2.
Cannot be peeled in situ
Fluoride-based acid etching [16,17]LiF/NaF/KF + HCl NH4HF2Clay-like MXene with large interlayer spacing and few -F terminations 1. Relatively safe
2. Direct ultrasonic peeling
1. Long etching time
2. Introducing fluoride salt impurities
Alkaline solution etching [13,29]NaOH TMAOHAccordion-like structure only with -O, -OH terminations (For TMAOH terminated with Al(OH)4−)1. No risk of acid corrosion
2. fluorine-free functional group
1. For NaOH: severe etching conditions
2. For TMAOH: need HF pretreatment
Molten fluoride salt and Lewis acidic molten melts etching [17,18]LiF + NaF + KF Lewis AcidAccordion-like structure (For Lewis Acid terminated with various halogens)1. For molten fluoride salt: can obtain nitride MXene
2. For Lewis acid: achieve precise control of surface functional groups
1. Introduce salt impurities
2. Severe etching conditions
Electrochemical etching [17,18,30]NH4Cl + TMAOHSingle or few-lawyer structure without -F functional group1. Safe etching environment
2. Fluorine-free functional group
3. Get stripped MXene directly
1. Strict etching conditions
2. Introduce salt impurities
Water-free etching [16,31]NH4HF2 in organic solventsAccordion-like structure with extremely high -F terminations1. Conducive to the use of organic systems due to the absence of water
2. Can be delaminated directly by ultrasonication
1. Long etching time
2. Tedious washing steps
HCl-based hydrothermal etching [16,32]HCl-hydrothermalLayered structure with-Cl and -O terminations1. Simple experiment operation
2. Fluorine-free functional group
1. Severe etching conditions
2. Rely on the prediction of precise reaction conditions by DFT
Halogenetching [33]Br2, I2, ICl, IBrAccordion-like structure terminated with various halogens1. Mild etching environment
2. Precise control of surface functional groups
1. Tedious etching and purification steps
2. Strict etching condition
Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process [26,27]Methane and bimetal foil (Cu/Mo)Ultra-thin and large-size flake1. High purity
2. Accurate control of thickness
1. Low productivity
2. High synthesis temperature
In Situ electrochemical synthesis [15,34]LiTFSI + Zn(OTF)2 In situ etching and stripping in the battery1. Green synthetic environment friendly
2. Extremely convenient operation
1. Rely on expensive metal ion salts
2. Restricted to be used inside the battery
Lithiation-expansion micro explosion mechanism [15,35]Lithium-ionSingle-layer or few-layer structure without -F functional group1. Simple and safe synthesis environment
2. Fluorine-free functional group
1. Low productivity
2. Consume resources
Microwave-assisted etching [36]Ti3AlC2 + HFLayered MXene sheets1. Very rapid (30 s)
2. High-quality sheets
3. Good capacitance
4. Scalable
1. Slight oxidation to TiO2
Table 2. Comparison of the electrochemical performance of different electrode 2D materials in aqueous supercapacitors [50].
Table 2. Comparison of the electrochemical performance of different electrode 2D materials in aqueous supercapacitors [50].
MaterialsElectrolyteCapacitance (Scan Rate)Stability (Retention/Cycles/Scan Rate)Energy Density (W h kg−1)Power Density (W h kg−1)Ref.
Ti3C2Tx3M H2SO4210 F g−1 at 10 V s−1---[51]
Ti3C2Tx1M H2SO4429 F g−1 at 1 A g−189% after 5000 cycles at 10 A g−129.2 at 1 A g−1320 at 1 A g−1[52]
PPy/Graphene1 M H2SO4626 F g−1 at 0.22 A g−175.4% after 5000 cycles at 4 A g−121.7110[53]
MoS20.5 M Li2SO4350 F g−1 at 5 mV s−188.0% after 10,000 cycles at 5 A g−11 50 at 1 A g−11000 at 1 A g−1[54]
Table 3. Various synthesis techniques to obtain porous MXenes.
Table 3. Various synthesis techniques to obtain porous MXenes.
SamplesMethodsStructures
Porous Ti3C2Tx Aerogel shapedFreeze dryingMesoporus/macroporous
MXene lamellar-liquid-crystalMechanically shearing assisted freeze dryingAligned vertically mesoporous/macroporous
Lamellar structured Ti3C2Tx/SiCnws foamBidirectional freeze-dryingAligned vertically mesoporous/macroporous
Super-elastic MXene/PI aerogelsFreeze dryingMeso/macropore with wide size distribution
Fluffy-type MXene microspheresSpray dryingMesoporous/macroporous
3DMXenefilmsHard-template methodMesoporous/macroporous
Cellular-type MXene foamHydrazine reduction techniqueMesoporous/macroporous
hybrid 3D porous network of MXene-SpongeDip-coating and dryingMacroporous
MXene-rGO aerogelChemical-reductionMesoporous/macroporous
MXene-rGO aerogelFreeze drying-calcinationMesoporous/macroporous
Cellulose-MXene aerogelChemical crosslinkingMesoporous/macroporous
TiO2/MXene, SnO2/MXeneSelf-assemblyMesoporous
FeNi-LDH-MXeneIn situ growthMesoporous
Core–shell Ti3C2-mSiO2Sol–gelMesoporous
MXene flakesOxidative-etchingMesoporous
MXene with divacancy-orderingSelective-etchingMicroporous and mesoporous
Table 4. Reference ranges of values for different printing methods (values taken from [122]).
Table 4. Reference ranges of values for different printing methods (values taken from [122]).
Printing TechnologyResolution [µm]Viscosity [cP]Thickness [µm]Speed
3D printing≈10–100≈105–108>50≈4 (m min⁻1)
Screen printing≈30–100≈100–107≈10–100≈70 (m min⁻1)
Inkjet printing≈10–50≈1–100≈0.5–5≈1 (m min⁻1)
Table 5. Comparison between printable MXene inks and traditional functional inks (Sc, supercapacitors; MSc, micro-supercapacitors).
Table 5. Comparison between printable MXene inks and traditional functional inks (Sc, supercapacitors; MSc, micro-supercapacitors).
MaterialFabrication TechniqueConcentrationSolventViscosityApplicationRef.
Ti3C2TxStamping22 mg mL⁻1Water1.37 Pa.sMSc[131]
MXene (Ti3C2Tx)Extrusion 3D printing36 mg mL⁻1Water0.71 Pa.sMSc[132]
MXene (Ti3C2Tx)Inkjet printing12.5 mg mL⁻1NMP13.8 m Pa.sMSc[132]
MXene (Ti3C2Tx)Inkjet printing2.1 mg mL⁻1DMSO12.8 m Pa.sMSc[132]
MXene (Ti3C2Tx)Inkjet printing0.8 mg mL⁻1ethanol7.3 m Pa.sMSc[132]
N-doped MXeneScreen printing-Water>104 Pa.sSc[133]
AC/CNT/MXene-N/GOExtrusion 3D printing-Water>104 Pa.sSc[133]
Pure MXeneScreen printing-Water288.2 Pa.sMSc[134]
M-AScreen printing-Water371.7 Pa.sMSc[134]
R-M-AScreen printing-Water234.4 Pa.sMSc[134]
R-M-A0.75:1Screen printing-Water179 Pa.sMSc[134]
2D Ti3C2TxExtrusion-based 3D printing15 mg mL⁻1Water>103 Pa.sSc[135]
2D Ti3C2TxExtrusion-based 3D printing30 mg mL⁻1Water>103 Pa.sSc[135]
2D Ti3C2TxExtrusion-based 3D printing50 mg mL⁻1Water>10⁴ Pa.sSc[135]
RuO2/PEDOT: PSS/GrapheneScreen printing-Water>103 cPSc[136]
V2O5/GO and G- VNQDs/GOExtrusion 3D printing50 mg mL⁻1->10⁴ Pa.sMSc[137]
GO LFP/GO and LTO/GOExtrusion 3D printing-Water102 to 103 Pa.sBatteries[138]
B-phosphorousInkjet printing≈5 gL⁻1IPA/2-butanol≈2 mPa.sOptoelectronics and photonics[139]
Graphene MoS2 WS2 and hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN)Inkjet printing-WaterBetween 1.38 and 1.27 mPa.sBiocompatibility (cytotoxicity studies)[140]
MoS2Inkjet printing0.1 mg mL⁻1Terpineol≈40 cP-[141]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Palladino, D.L.; Baino, F. MXenes: Properties, Applications, and Potential in 3D Printing. Ceramics 2025, 8, 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics8020064

AMA Style

Palladino DL, Baino F. MXenes: Properties, Applications, and Potential in 3D Printing. Ceramics. 2025; 8(2):64. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics8020064

Chicago/Turabian Style

Palladino, Donato Luca, and Francesco Baino. 2025. "MXenes: Properties, Applications, and Potential in 3D Printing" Ceramics 8, no. 2: 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics8020064

APA Style

Palladino, D. L., & Baino, F. (2025). MXenes: Properties, Applications, and Potential in 3D Printing. Ceramics, 8(2), 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics8020064

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop