1. Introduction
Refractories are indispensable for industrial high-temperature processes and, therefore, of enormous economic importance, with around 70% of these materials being used in the steel industry [
1]. After their useful life, they can serve as a valuable source of raw materials [
2]. Their recycling for the purpose of partial replacement of primary raw materials in the production of refractories has the potential for higher economic and environmental benefits compared with the so-called open-loop recycling applications, such as roadbed aggregates or slag conditioners in steel production [
1]. Thus far, only about 7% of the raw materials in the refractory industry come from recycling [
1,
3]. However, because of the rising costs of raw materials and energy prices, as well as environmental protection requirements, the recycling of refractories as secondary raw materials for refractory production is gaining importance. The benefits of recycling include reduced consumption of natural raw materials, energy savings, less dependence on raw material suppliers, reduced waste to be disposed of in landfills, and a reduction in CO
2 emissions [
1,
2,
4]. Disadvantages are the usually higher internal porosity of the recyclate aggregates, resulting in higher porosities of the refractory [
1,
5,
6,
7,
8], and the often higher impurity contents than primary raw materials [
1,
4]. Thorough sorting of the used refractories, the proper removal of impurities, such as slag or iron, and appropriate quality assurance management are essential to avoid variations in the quality of the recycled material [
1,
2,
7]. Sorting systems based on laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) have been developed to support sorting [
1].
Owing to their high resistance to thermal shock and slags [
9], magnesia–carbon (MgO-C) materials are among the most important refractories used in steel production. Their main applications are wear linings in basic oxygen furnaces (converters), electric arc furnaces, and steel treatment ladles [
10]. The used refractories from converters are particularly suitable for recycling because they contain relatively few other types of material [
7]. In [
6], it was estimated that about 40% of the original converter lining is consumed by wear. About half of the remaining 60% is recyclable material, from which secondary raw materials for refractories can be obtained.
The suitability of recycled MgO-C for this purpose may be severely limited if the original MgO-C bricks contained reactive metal powders as antioxidants [
6,
7]. The most common antioxidant is aluminum (Al). At the operating temperatures during the use of the original MgO-C refractory, aluminum carbide is formed (along with other compounds), with the Al
4C
3 formation starting above the melting temperature of Al (660 °C) [
9]. Aluminum carbide has high reactivity with moisture. As a result, during the manufacturing process of the recyclate-containing refractory, severe cracking may occur if no additional treatments are applied as a countermeasure [
1,
11,
12].
In [
11], used MgO-C with high Al content from the converter was subjected to a thermal treatment at 900 °C under oxidizing atmosphere after crushing, grinding, and screening, through which about 90% of the carbon was burned out. The authors did not provide information on the original Al content but reported that the Al
2O
3 content in the unfractionated recycled material after the aforementioned thermal treatment was 4.7 wt%. MgO-C bricks containing up to 53% of this recyclate were produced. They showed similar properties to standard bricks. Other authors investigated the use of a recyclate obtained from the MgO-C lining material of electric arc and ladle furnaces to produce magnesia bricks and magnesia ramming mixes [
8]. The carbon was burned out at 1400 °C in their study. Only the 1–4 mm fraction of the recyclate was used, as impurities usually accumulate in the fine particle fraction. The recyclate content in the refractories was up to 30 wt%. The recyclate-containing specimens showed higher porosities than the reference samples but adequate strengths and slightly improved corrosion resistance. In [
4], a MgO-C recyclate in two aggregate size fractions, 1–4 and 4–6 mm, was used without a carbon removal step for the production of MgO-C bricks. The investigated recyclate contents of up to 30 wt% did not worsen the properties of the refractory material.
In the present work, a commercially available MgO-C recyclate was initially examined using optical and scanning electron microscopy. Subsequently, MgO-C formulations with different contents of recycled material up to 82 wt% were developed. Unlike in [
4], not only the coarse fractions of MgO-C recyclate were utilized but also a fine fraction (the 0–1 mm fraction). The influence of the recycled MgO-C material on the structure, chemical composition, and properties of MgO-C refractory samples was investigated.
2. Materials and Methods
The MgO-C recyclate R94A1 from Horn & Co. RHIM Minerals Recovery GmbH/Germany, supplied in the aggregate size fractions 3–6, 1–3, and 0–1 mm, was used for the experimental investigations. MgO-C from the converter is the main source of this recyclate, although, to a minor extent, MgO-C from the electric arc furnace is also utilized [
13]. The chemical composition of the unfractionated material (without considering the carbon) according to the manufacturer’s specification can be found in
Table 1. It is worth mentioning that the Al
2O
3 content of this MgO-C recyclate can be considered relatively low. Each production batch was carefully controlled, particularly by means of X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy. The analysis data of the quality assurance over a period of 12 months are also given in
Table 1.
The carbon content was analyzed separately for each recyclate fraction by means of a CS744 carbon–sulfur analyzer (Leco Instrumente GmbH, Mönchengladbach, Germany). It was about 4.9 wt% in the coarsest, 7.6 wt% in the 1–3 mm, and 11.0 wt% in the finest fraction [
14].
Furthermore, two grades of Chinese fused magnesia were used: FM97 in three fractions (3–5, 1–3, and 0–1 mm) and FM96DIN. The latter showed a volume-weighted particle size distribution with the following percentile values, determined with a Better Sizer S3 Plus (3P Instruments GmbH, Odelzhausen, Germany): d
10 = 15 µm, d
50 = 71 µm, d
90 = 151 µm [
14]. The designation of the fused magnesia (FM) is related to its purity, i.e., 97 and 96 wt%, respectively. Natural flake graphite NFL90/92 (Quingdao Kropfmuehl Graphite Co., Ltd., Quingdao, China) served as a carbon source.
Figure 1 shows images of the recyclate and the primary raw materials taken by means of a digital microscope VHX-2000 (Keyence GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany).
Bakelite® Resin PF9950FL (Hexion GmbH, Iserlohn, Germany), which is a phenolic novolak solved in ethylene glycol, hexamethylenetetramine (Hexion GmbH, Iserlohn, Germany) as curing agent for the novolak, and the modified coal tar pitch powder Carbores® P (Rain Carbon Germany GmbH, Castrop-Rauxel, Germany) served as a binder combination.
For the qualitative analysis of the impurities via energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), samples of the 0–1 mm fraction of the recyclate and FM97 magnesia were prepared in small graphite tubes and examined under a scanning electron microscope XL-30 ESEM FEG (FEI/Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands).
Recyclate aggregates of all three fractions were embedded in epoxy resin, and polished sections were prepared. Optical micrographs were taken using the above-mentioned digital microscope VHX-2000. In addition, the polished sections of the aggregates were investigated under a scanning electron microscope Amber FIB-SEM (Tescan, Brno, Czech Republic) including spot analysis via EDS (Bruker Nano GmbH, Berlin, Germany).
Samples of the 0–1 mm recyclate fraction and the graphite NFL90/92 prepared on conductive carbon pads were also examined in the Amber FIB-SEM. The purpose of the latter investigation was to compare the graphite flakes contained in the recyclate with those of the NFL90/92 graphite.
The formulations for the preparation of MgO-C specimens were based on a mixture of exclusively primary raw materials used in [
12]. This mixture is given in
Table 2 in the column “R94A1:FM97 = 0:100”. Compared with the base formulation used in our previous work [
14], this mixture contained a lower percentage of the 0–1 mm and a higher percentage of the 3–5 mm FM97 fraction. If the graphite was not considered, the base mixture was composed of 23.0 wt% FM97/3–5 mm, 37.0 wt% FM97/1–3 mm, 25.0 wt% FM97/0–1 mm, and 15 wt% FM96DIN. The weight ratio between the R94A1 recyclate and the FM97 magnesia was gradually increased to 50:50, 80:20, and finally 100:0. The percentage of the fine-grained FM96DIN magnesia was left at 15% of the total weight without the graphite. The graphite content in the recyclate-containing mixtures was determined on the basis of the measured carbon contents of the recyclate fractions so that the total carbon content remained approximately constant. The resulting formulations are shown in
Table 2. The added amounts of Bakelite PF9950FL, hexamethylenetetramine, and Carbores
® P were kept constant for all mixtures and can be found in the same table.
The mixtures were homogenized in a laboratory mortar mixer ToniMIX (Toni Technik Baustoffprüfsysteme GmbH, Berlin, Germany). By uniaxial pressing using a KV270 press (Rucks Maschinenbau GmbH, Glauchau, Germany), sample bars with dimensions of 150 mm × 25 mm × 25 mm and cylindrical specimens with a height and a diameter of 50 mm were produced at a pressure of 150 MPa. By means of thermal treatment with a maximum temperature of 180 °C in air, the novolak contained in the samples was cured. Subsequently, the samples were subjected to heat treatment in a retort filled with coke grit at 1000 °C and with a holding time of 5 h at this temperature to pyrolyze (coke) the binders.
The bulk density and the open porosity after coking were determined from the mass of the dried sample, the apparent mass of the liquid-soaked sample immersed in liquid, and the mass of the soaked sample in air. Toluene was used as the immersion liquid. The measurement was carried out according to DIN EN 993-1, except for the sample dimensions, which were approximately 75 mm × 25 mm × 25 mm.
The coked specimen bars were examined in a computer tomograph CT-ALPHA (ProCon X-Ray GmbH, Sarstedt, Germany) equipped with a 160 kV X-ray transmission tube (Feinfocus Röntgen-Systeme GmbH, Garbsen, Germany) and a Dexela CMOS flat panel X-ray detector 1207 (PerkinElmer Technologies GmbH & Co. KG, Walluf, Germany).
To investigate the chemical composition of the produced MgO-C materials, the samples were ground in a vibrating disk mill using a tungsten carbide grinding set and analyzed by XRF using an XRF spectrometer Bruker S8 Tiger II (Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) after burning out the carbon at 1000 °C.
To evaluate the thermal shock behavior, the coked sample bars to be tested were preheated at 250 °C and then transferred to a furnace preheated to 950 °C, which contained a bed of coke grit to minimize the oxidation of the refractory specimens. After 30 min, the specimens were removed from the furnace, placed on a steel plate, and quenched for 5 min using compressed air (0.1 MPa). The procedure was based on DIN EN 993-11 and modified by using the coke bed. Each sample was subjected to five thermal shocks. The cold modulus of rupture (CMOR) of the specimens after five thermal shocks and that of the sample bars not subjected to thermal shocks was determined based on DIN EN 993-6 using a TIRAtest materials testing machine (TIRA GmbH, Schalkau, Germany). The percentage strength loss caused by the thermal shocks was calculated.
The refractoriness under load (RUL) was determined by means of an RUL/CIC 421 apparatus (Netzsch GmbH, Selb, Germany) on drilled samples with a reduced diameter of 40 mm and a height of 50 mm in order to be able to encase them in coke grit to suppress oxidation during the measurement. The samples were heated under a constant compressive load of 0.2 MPa at a rate of 5 K/min up to a temperature of 1600 °C, and their height change was recorded by means of an inductive displacement transducer.
4. Conclusions
The partial substitution of primary raw materials for the production of MgO-C refractories by the MgO-C recyclate R94A1, which has a relatively low Al2O3 level, was investigated up to high recyclate contents of 82 wt%.
Through a comparative qualitative EDS elemental analysis of this recyclate and the fused magnesia FM97 using the finest fraction (0–1 mm), where impurities are generally enriched, calcium, silicon, and iron were found in both materials. The EDS spectrum of the recyclate additionally indicated an increased aluminum content. Consequently, the Al2O3 content of the produced MgO-C materials increased with the increasing recyclate content, whereas those of CaO, SiO2, and Fe2O3 decreased. Even though the finest recyclate fraction, which usually contains the highest amount of impurities, was also used for the production of the MgO-C samples, there was no decrease in the MgO content of the refractory material analyzed with XRF after carbon burnout. Minor impurity elements in the recyclate, determined with EDS, were sulfur, phosphorus, potassium, sodium, and traces of barium.
The optical microscopy of the polished sections revealed a wide variety in the structure and composition of the recyclate aggregates. Some were predominantly composed of MgO, but many consisted of MgO grains of different sizes embedded in the carbonaceous matrix. As a result, the size distribution of the MgO grains in the MgO-C refractories was changed, which was evident from comparing a sample that contained 82 wt% of the recyclate with a recyclate-free specimen using computed tomography studies. Furthermore, an increase in the porosity of the MgO-C samples with increasing recyclate content was observed, which could be mainly attributed to the higher on-average internal porosity of the recyclate aggregates. On the one hand, the use of the recyclate resulted in a reduction in the CMOR, but on the other hand, it led to increased thermal shock resistance. Higher recyclate contents caused RUL impairment. At a recyclate content of about 40 wt%, this effect was still minor.
In summary, it can be concluded that the recyclate used is suitable as a raw material for MgO-C refractories. However, some properties deteriorate with increasing recyclate content. In terms of porosity, CMOR, and RUL, the lowest of the recyclate contents used, 40 wt%, is preferable. The highest possible recyclate content depends on the field of application. Therefore, the recyclate content has to be adapted to the specific application requirements. In addition, the achievable properties after up-scaling have to be investigated, since the industrial production of refractories usually leads to lower porosities than the laboratory-scale production of small samples. The highest recyclate content investigated within this study, 82 wt%, will nevertheless only be suitable for applications with comparatively low refractory requirements. In any case, the suitability of the refractories with recyclate content must be verified under operating conditions in the particular device, e.g., in different zones of the ladle.