Next Article in Journal
Polymeric Nanocomposites of Iron–Oxide Nanoparticles (IONPs) Synthesized Using Terminalia chebula Leaf Extract for Enhanced Adsorption of Arsenic(V) from Water
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of the Synthesis Method on the Structural Characteristics of Novel Hybrid Adsorbents Based on Bentonite
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Wettability of DPPC Monolayers Deposited from the Titanium Dioxide–Chitosan–Hyaluronic Acid Subphases on Glass
Article Menu

Export Article

Colloids Interfaces 2019, 3(1), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids3010016

Article
Conversion of D-Fructose into Ethyl Lactate Over a Supported SnO2–ZnO/Al2O3 Catalyst
Institute for Sorption and Problems of Endoecology of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 13 General Naumov Str., Kyiv 03164, Ukraine
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 17 December 2018 / Accepted: 22 January 2019 / Published: 25 January 2019

Abstract

:
The study is directed to the search of a simple effective catalyst for ethyl lactate obtained from fructose as renewable raw material. A series of SnO2-containing oxides prepared by impregnation of alumina were characterized by several techniques in order to determine their textural and acid-base properties. The transformation of a 13% fructose solution in 98% ethanol over SnO2/Al2O3 catalysts using autoclave rotated with 60 rpm at 160 °C for 3 h was studied. It was found that doping SnO2/Al2O3 samples with ZnO improves selectivity towards ethyl lactate. The supported SnO2-ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst provides 100% fructose conversion with 55% yield of ethyl lactate at 160 °C. A possible scheme of fructose transformation into ethyl lactate on L-acid IVSn4+ sites is discussed.
Keywords:
fructose; ethyl lactate; SnO2/Al2O3 catalyst

1. Introduction

Ethyl lactate obtained from lactic acid and ethanol is used mainly as green solvent, as well as in the food, cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries [1,2,3]. At present, ethyl lactate is considered as material for synthesis of monomeric lactide and ethyl acrylate [3]. Therefore, considerable attention is paid to the search for alternative methods for its preparation [4,5,6,7,8]. Some progress was made in the synthesis of alkyl lactates from dihydroxyacetone [4,5,6] and glycerol [7]. In a particular, the direct synthesis of ethyl lactate from glycerol solution in ethanol on CeO2/Al2O3 catalyst at 230 °C was realized [7]. Recently, many works have been devoted to studying the activity of Sn-containing oxides, such as mesoporous MCM-41 [9,10], SBA-15 [10] materials and MFI [10], BEA [10], MWW [11] zeolites as catalysts for conversion of carbohydrates into alkyl lactates.
Holm with co-workers [8] found in 2010 that Sn-Beta zeolite directly catalyzes the transformation of mono- and disaccharides in methanol (0.1 mmol/L) into methyl lactate at 160 °C. Also, authors [12] showed that Zn-Sn-Beta converts sucrose into lactic acid with 54% yield at 190 °C after 2 h.
Numerous studies with different zeolites and their acidity showed that a combination of Lewis and Bronsted acidity catalyzes the selective conversion of monosaccharides to lactates [8,9]. It is known that Brønsted strong acid sites catalyze alternative reactions that lead to the formation of undesirable by–products [8,9,10,11]. Recent studies have shown that the addition of alkali ions to the reaction mixture or using dual metal tin-containing zeolite system as a catalyst increases the conversion of sucrose to lactic acid or lactate [12,13]. However, the preparation of Sn-zeolites is rather complicated procedure. In this work, we have used several Sn-containing oxides obtained by a simple impregnation method as catalysts of one-pot conversion of fructose into ethyl lactate.

2. Materials and Methods

Pure SnO2 was prepared by precipitation from solution of SnCl4·5H2O with urea at 90 °C. After washing and drying at 110 °C, the precipitate was granulated and calcined at 550 °C in flowing air for 2 h.
Alumina-supported Sn-catalysts containing 10–25 wt.% SnO2 were prepared by incipient wetness impregnation of commercial γ-Al2O3 (Alvigo) with calculated aqueous solutions of SnCl4·5H2O (Aldrich, 98%). Before the impregnation procedures, γ-Al2O3 was treated at 250 °C in flowing air for 3 h. The samples were denoted as zSnO2/Al2O3, where z is the SnO2 content expressed in wt.%. The supported SnO2/Al2O3 precursors were calcined at 550 °C for 2 h. Sample 10SnO2/Al2O3 was additionally impregnated with an aqueous solution of Zn(CH3COO)2 by incipient wetness impregnation. After thermal treatment, the zinc oxide content was 5 wt.%. The sample was denoted as 10SnO2–5ZnO/Al2O3.
Thermal analysis studies were carried out using a Perkin Elmer thermogravimetric analyser (TGA). Samples were purged with either nitrogen or oxygen and heated from room temperature to 800 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min.
XRD patterns of samples were recorded with DRON-4-07 diffractometer (CuKα radiation). Diffraction patterns were identified by comparing with those from the JCPDS (Joint Committee of Powder Diffraction Standards) database.
The textural parameters of the samples were calculated from the adsorption–desorption isotherms of nitrogen using the BET method (Quantachrome Nova 2200e Surface Area and Pore Size Analyser). The computational error for Ssp determination is ≤2%.
UV-Vis diffuse reflectans spectra were recorded using a Perkin Elmer Lambda 40 spectrophotometer equipped with a diffuse reflectance chamber and integrating sphere (Labsphere RSA-PE-20). Prior to each experiment, samples were compacted in a sample holder to obtain a sample thickness of ≈2 mm. In order to determine the forbidden gap energy E0, the reflectance spectra were recalculated to absorption spectra using Kubelka–Munk formula, F = (hν(1 − R)2/2R)1/2. E0 values were determined from the nearly linear long-wave segment of absorption band plot extrapolated to interception with abscissa [14]. The material used as a reference was MgO.
Total number of acid or base sites was determined by reverse titration using n-butylamine or 2,4-dinitrophenol solution in cyclohexane, respectively, with bromthymol blue as an indicator. The highest acid or base strength was examined by the Hammett indicators method [15] using 0.1% solution of the corresponding indicators in cyclohexane.
For catalytic experiments, 13 wt.% solution of D-fructose (N98%, Merck) in anhydrous ethanol was used as a reaction mixture. The experiments were carried out in a rotated autoclave (60 rpm) at 160 °C for 3 h. Usually, 1.5 g of fructose, 10 g of anhydrous ethanol and 0.68 g (6 wt.%) of a catalyst were placed into a 25-mL Teflon can. The formation of insoluble products at these conditions was not observed.
The reaction products were analyzed using 13C NMR spectroscopy (Bruker Avance 400, Karlsruhe, Germany). The conversion values of fructose (X) and selectivity of products (S, mol%) were calculated from 13C NMR spectra. Yields were calculated as Y = S∙X.

3. Results and Discussion

All synthesized samples were analyzed by several techniques in order to study their chemical, structural, textural and acid properties. Textural and acidic properties of synthesized SnO2/Al2O3 oxides are summarized in Table 1.
According to the thermogravimetric analysis of as-calcined 20SnO2/Al2O3 sample (Figure 1), the condensation of structural OH-groups with water release is observed at 300 °C, and crystallites of SnO2 are formed at 450–550 °C.
The small decrease (10–18%) in the surface area of alumina support occurs upon the deposition of tin oxide what probably explained by blocking of the aluminum pores with the precipitated oxide (Table 1). As seen from the pore size distribution curves (Figure 2), derived from the desorption branches of isotherms using the DFT method, the deposition of SnO2 on alumina surface leads to decrease in pore content with r ≤ 3 nm for 10SnO2/Al2O3 and 20SnO2/Al2O3 samples. At the same time, for 25SnO2/Al2O3 sample, a decrease in pore content with r~4–5 nm is observed. Obviously, the SnO2 crystallites with sizes of more than 3 nm are formed at increase in the content of supported tin dioxide.
The structural analysis by XRD shows that at loadings ≤20 wt.% SnO2 no characteristic peaks assigned to tin oxide were observed (Figure 3). It indicates high dispersion of tin oxide on the alumina surface. Small peaks appeared at 2θ = 26.6°;33.9°;38.0° and 51.8°corresponding to tetragonal SnO2 for 25SnO2/Al2O3 sample were detected (Figure 3).
According to the titration results, γ-Al2O3 is weakly acid oxide with H0 ≤ +3.3 (Table 1). The addition of SnO2 to alumina surface increases the strength of acid sites of supported SnO2/Al2O3 samples to H0 ≤ +1.5. Also, at increasing SnO2 content from 10 to 25 wt.%, the concentration of acid sites raises from 1.2 to 1.8 mmol/g (Table 1).
According to the UV-Vis data, IVSn4+ or VISn4+ ions with different coordination are present in studied samples. So, UV−Vis spectrum of 25SnO2/Al2O3 sample shows a broad line around 260 nm, which is attributed to octahedral VISn4+ ions in SnO2 phase (Figure 4a). However, for 10SnO2/Al2O3 and 20SnO2/Al2O3 samples the maximum intensity is observed at 200 nm that attributed to isolated tetrahedral IVSn4+ ions [14] (Figure 4a).
Figure 4b illustrates the optical band gap (Eg) for these samples. It is known [14] that Eg value for massive SnO2 is near 3.55 eV. As stated in [5,16,17], the larger SnO2 particle size, the lower Eg values. The Eg values determined for studied samples are in the interval of 3.7–4.9 eV (Figure 4b) what coincide with similar data in [5,17]. Eg value for γ-Al2O3 is ~5.25 eV. Thus, for 20SnO2/Al2O3 sample, the shift of Eg to 4.8 eV indicates the nanosized SnO2 species with IVSn4+ ions that absorb UV light at 200 nm (Figure 4).
Synthesized Sn-containing oxides were tested in the conversion of 13 wt.% fructose-ethanol solution into ethyl lactate. The results are summarized in Table 2. Without a catalyst, the slight dehydration of fructose to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF) is observed at 27% fructose conversion (Table 2).
On pure SnO2 at 160 °C, 100% conversion of fructose occurs with the formation of acid dehydration product—5-hydroxymethylfurfural (Table 2). Levulinic and formic acids and their esters are also formed, as it was in [18].
Target ethyl lactate is formed with 34–53% selectivity at 95–100% fructose conversion on prepared SnO2/Al2O3 samples (Table 2). However, the significant amount of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural is also formed (Table 2). For instance, in 13C NMRspectrum of products obtained on 20SnO2/Al2O3at 160 °C, the signals were observed from target ethyl lactate (175.8; 66,9; 61.5; 20.4; 14.2 ppm) and by-products: 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (178.0; 161.4; 152.1; 123.9; 110.1; 57.2 ppm), benzoic acid (172.8; 113.8; 130; 129.4; 128.5 ppm) and 5-methyl-2-furaldegyde (176.8; 159.8; 152; 124; 109.6; 14 ppm) (Figure 5). The intensive ethanol signals at 56; 18.5 ppm and weak lines of unreacted fructose (104; 101.9; 82.8; 81.8; 80.8; 75.7; 75.6; 75.2; 63.6; 62.8; 60.9 ppm) were registered also (Figure 5). The ratio of signal areas at 175.8; 178.0; 172.8; 176.8 ppm allows estimate selectivity of ethyl lactate formation. At that, preliminary the calibration 13C NMR spectra of ethyl lactate: 5-hydroxymethylfurfural: ethanol mixtures with molar ratios of 0.5:1:10; 1:1:10; 1:2:10 have been recorded.
The addition of a small amount (0.03 wt.%) of potassium carbonate to the fructose–ethanol initial mixture raises the pH value of a reaction solution from 6 to 10. As a result, the yield of ethyl lactate increased due to inhibition of hexose dehydration (Table 2). The same effect was observed in [13]. Ethyl lactate selectivity increased from 53% to 61% at 100% conversion of fructose while simultaneous slight decrease in the amount of dehydration products on 20SnO2/Al2O3 catalyst (Table 2). Further increase in added potassium carbonate up to 0.1 wt.% leads to decrease of ethyl lactate selectivity from 61% to 49%.
We have doped SnO2/Al2O3 with ZnO oxide for decreasing acidity of the catalyst. As a result, ethyl lactate yield increased to 56% with significant decrease of 5-HMF content (Table 2). As seen from Table 1, the highest acid strength (H0max,) of this catalyst decreases from +1.5 to +3.3. At that, in comparison with 10SnO2/Al2O3, for 10SnO2–5ZnO/Al2O3 sample the weak base sites with H0 = +7.2 at total content—0.6mmol/g were detected. The decreasing of 5-HMF formation was observed on the Sn-β zeolite doped with Zn2+ ions also in [12].
It should be noted that in the experiments we have used a 13% fructose solution in ethanol at mass ratio of fructose/catalyst = 2.4, whereas usually the weaker concentrations of 1–3% with fructose/catalyst = 1.4 were used [8,9,10,11,12,13].
The principal scheme of fructose–ethanol transformation into ethyl lactate is known [8,9,10,13,15,16]. The first step of the reaction is the aldol decondensation of fructose to glyceraldehyde and dihydroxyacetone. In acidic medium, the equilibrium shifts to gliceral formation. Further, gliceral dehydration occurs with the formation of pyruval that easily reacts with ethanol to form hemiacetal. Then, there is a subsequent isomerization of hemiacetal into ethyl lactate.
The obtained results show that acid IVSn4+ L-sites catalyze aldol decondensation of fructose as the first stage of the ethyl lactate formation (Scheme 1a) as well as initiate the isomerization of hemiacetal into ethyl lactate (Scheme 1b).

4. Conclusions

Ethyl lactate with 56% yield has been obtained from concentrated 13% fructose solutions in 98% ethanol on supported SnO–ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst at 160 °C. At that, 100% fructose conversion was observed. It is supposed that L-acid IVSn4+ sites provide both C3–C4 aldol decondensation of fructose and subsequent isomerisation of formed hemiacetal of pyruval into ethyl lactate.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.V.B.; investigation, S.V.P. and N.L.H.; data curation, S.V.P.; writing—original draft preparation, S.V.P.; writing—review and editing, V.V.B.; project administration, V.V.B.

Funding

This research received no external funding

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Tretja, S.; Burtin, E.; Teissier, R. Continuous Ethyl Lactate Preparation Method. US Patent 0041165 A1, 23 February 2006. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pereira, C.S.M.; Silva, V.M.T.M.; Rodrigues, A.E. Ethyl lactate as a solvent: Properties, applications and production processes—A review. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 2658–2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Upare, P.P.; Hwang, Y.K.; Chang, J.-S.; Hwang, D.W. Synthesis of lactide from alkyl lactate via a prepolymer route. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 4837–4842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mylin, A.M.; Levytska, S.I.; Sharanda, M.E.; Brei, V.V. Selective conversion of dihydroxyacetone–ethanol mixture into ethyl lactate over amphoteric ZrO2–TiO2 catalyst. Catal. Commun. 2014, 47, 36–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pighin, E.; Diez, V.K.; Di Cosimo, J.I. Synthesis of ethyl lactate from triose sugars on Sn/Al2O3 catalysts. Appl. Catal. A 2016, 517, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lin, K.; Li, L.; Sels, B.F.; Jacobs, P.A.; Pescarmona, P.P. Titanosilicate beads as versatile catalysts for the conversion of trioses to lactates and for the epoxidation of alkenes. Catal. Today 2011, 173, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mylin, A.M.; Brei, V.V. Selective conversion of ethanol solution of glycerol to ethyl lactate on CeO2/Al2O3 catalyst. Ukr. Chem. J. 2016, 82, 79–83. [Google Scholar]
  8. Murillo, B.; Sanchez, A.; Sebastian, V.; Casado-Coterillo, C.; Iglesia, M.; Lopez-Ram-de-Viu, P.; Telleza, C.; Coronasa, J. Conversion of glucose to lactic acid derivatives with Sn-MCM-41 and microporous titanosilicates. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2014, 89, 1344–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Osmundsen, C.M.; Holm, M.S.; Dahl, S.; Taarning, E. Tin-containing silicates: Structure-activity relations. Proc. R. Soc. A 2012, 468, 2000–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Guo, Q.; Fan, F.; Pidko, E.A.; Van der Graaff, W.N.P.; Feng, Z.; Li, C.; Hensen, E.J.M. Highly active and recyclable Sn-MWW zeolite catalyst for sugar conversion to methyl lactate and lactic acid. ChemSusChem 2013, 6, 1352–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Holm, M.S.; Saravanamurugan, S.; Taarning, E. Conversion of sugars to lactic acid derivatives using heterogeneous zeotype catalysts. Science 2010, 328, 602–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dong, W.; Shen, Z.; Peng, B.; Gu, M.; Zhou, X.; Xiang, B.; Zhang, Y. Selective Chemical Conversion of Sugars in Aqueous Solutions without Alkali to Lactic Acid Over a Zn-Sn-Beta Lewis Acid-Base Catalyst. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tolborg, S.; Sdaba, I.; Osmundsen, C.M.; Fristrup, P.; Holm, M.S.; Taarning, E. Tin-containing Silicates: Alkali Salts Improve Methyl Lactate Yield from Sugars. ChemSusChem 2014, 2, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Roy, S.; Bakhmutsky, K.; Mahmoud, E.; Lobo, R.F.; Gorte, R.J. Probing Lewis Acid Sites in Sn-Beta Zeolite. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tanabe, K. Solid Acids and Bases: Their Catalytic Properties; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA; London, UK, 1970; pp. 5–35. ISBN 0-12-683250-1. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bhagwat, M.; Shah, P.; Ramaswamy, V. Synthesis of nanocrystalline SnO2 powder by amorphous citrate route. Mater. Lett. 2003, 57, 1604–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Razeghizadeh, A.R.; Zalaghi, L.; Kazeminezhad, I.; Rafee, V. Growth and Optical Properties Investigation of Pure and Al-doped SnO2 Nanostructures by Sol-Gel Method. Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng. 2017, 36, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  18. Shaw, P.E.; Tatum, J.H.; Berry, R.E. Acid-catalyzed degradation of D-fructose. Carbohyd. Res. 1967, 5, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. TG/DTA curves of as-synthesized 20SnO2/Al2O3 sample.
Figure 1. TG/DTA curves of as-synthesized 20SnO2/Al2O3 sample.
Colloids 03 00016 g001
Figure 2. DFT pore-size distributions of samples calcined at 550 °C.
Figure 2. DFT pore-size distributions of samples calcined at 550 °C.
Colloids 03 00016 g002
Figure 3. XRD patterns of zSnO2/Al2O3 samples after calcinations at 550 °C for 2 h.
Figure 3. XRD patterns of zSnO2/Al2O3 samples after calcinations at 550 °C for 2 h.
Colloids 03 00016 g003
Figure 4. UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra of zSnO2/Al2O3 samples with different Sn loading (a); optical energy band gap (b).
Figure 4. UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra of zSnO2/Al2O3 samples with different Sn loading (a); optical energy band gap (b).
Colloids 03 00016 g004
Figure 5. 13C NMR spectrum of fructose conversion products on 20SnO2/Al2O3 (13% fructose solution in ethanol, 160 °C, 3 h; 100 MHz, NS = 256, D0 = 4 s, D1 = 4 μs (30°)).
Figure 5. 13C NMR spectrum of fructose conversion products on 20SnO2/Al2O3 (13% fructose solution in ethanol, 160 °C, 3 h; 100 MHz, NS = 256, D0 = 4 s, D1 = 4 μs (30°)).
Colloids 03 00016 g005
Scheme 1. Possible schemes of fructose decondensation (a) and the rearrangement of hemiacetal into ethyl lactate (b) on acid IVSn4+ L-sites.
Scheme 1. Possible schemes of fructose decondensation (a) and the rearrangement of hemiacetal into ethyl lactate (b) on acid IVSn4+ L-sites.
Colloids 03 00016 sch001
Table 1. Textural parameters and total acidity of synthesized SnO2/Al2O3 samples.
Table 1. Textural parameters and total acidity of synthesized SnO2/Al2O3 samples.
SampleSpecific Surface Area, m2/gPore Volume, cm3/gAverage Pore Diameter, nmHighest Acid Strength, H0max Total Content of Acid Sites, mmol/g
Al2O32900.8210.7+3.31.2
SnO2390.077.2+1.50.4
10SnO2/Al2O32500.6711.4+1.51.3
20SnO2/Al2O32280.6210.8+1.51.5
25SnO2/Al2O32420.6210.2+1.51.8
10SnO2–5ZnO/Al2O32320.6510.2+3.31.3
Table 2. Product content of fructose conversion. 1
Table 2. Product content of fructose conversion. 1
CatalystConversion of Fructose, %Content of Products, mol%Yield of EL, %
FructoseEL5-HMFOthers 3
1-2773-423-
2SnO2100-285132
310SnO2/Al2O395534372432
420SnO2/Al2O39735137949
525SnO2/Al2O39553458332
620SnO2/Al2O3 2100-6134561
710SnO2-5ZnO/Al2O3100-56143056
EL—ethyllactate, 5-HMF—5-hydroxymethylfurfural; 1 Reaction condition: 1,5 g fructose, 0,68 g catalyst, 10 g 98% ethanol, 160 °C, 3 h; 2 3 mg K2CO3 was added to 10 g 98% ethanol; 3 Others: β-D-Fructopyranose, benzoic acid, 5-methyl-2-furaldegyde, levulinic and formic acids and its esters.

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Colloids Interfaces EISSN 2504-5377 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top