Next Article in Journal
Morphological Features and Sorption Performance of Materials Based on Birnessite Exposed to Various Reductive Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Magnetic Field on Evaporation Rate and Surface Tension of Water
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Submicrocontainers with “Green” Biocide and Study of Their Antimicrobial Activity
Open AccessArticle

Dynamic Measurements with the Bicone Interfacial Shear Rheometer: Numerical Bench-Marking of Flow Field-Based Data Processing

1
Departamento de Física Fundamental, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Senda del Rey 9, 28040 Madrid, Spain
2
Departamento de Física Aplicada, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, Avenida Fuente Nueva s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain
3
Grupo de Sistemas Complejos, ETSIAAB, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Av. Puerta de Hierro 4, 28040 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current Address: Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Colloids Interfaces 2018, 2(4), 69; https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids2040069
Received: 7 October 2018 / Revised: 19 November 2018 / Accepted: 3 December 2018 / Published: 7 December 2018
Flow field-based methods are becoming increasingly popular for the analysis of interfacial shear rheology data. Such methods take properly into account the subphase drag by solving the Navier–Stokes equations for the bulk phase flows, together with the Boussinesq–Scriven boundary condition at the fluid–fluid interface and the probe equation of motion. Such methods have been successfully implemented on the double wall-ring (DWR), the magnetic rod (MR), and the bicone interfacial shear rheometers. However, a study of the errors introduced directly by the numerical processing is still lacking. Here, we report on a study of the errors introduced exclusively by the numerical procedure corresponding to the bicone geometry at an air–water interface. In our study, we set an input value of the complex interfacial viscosity, and we numerically obtained the corresponding flow field and the complex amplitude ratio for the probe motion. Then, we used the standard iterative procedure to obtain the calculated complex viscosity value. A detailed comparison of the set and calculated complex viscosity values was made in wide ranges of the three parameters herein used, namely the real and imaginary parts of the complex interfacial viscosity and the frequency. The observed discrepancies yield a detailed landscape of the numerically-introduced errors. View Full-Text
Keywords: interfacial rheology; interfacial shear rheometer; bicone interfacial rheometer; flow field-based data processing interfacial rheology; interfacial shear rheometer; bicone interfacial rheometer; flow field-based data processing
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Sánchez-Puga, P.; Tajuelo, J.; Pastor, J.M.; Rubio, M.A. Dynamic Measurements with the Bicone Interfacial Shear Rheometer: Numerical Bench-Marking of Flow Field-Based Data Processing. Colloids Interfaces 2018, 2, 69.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop