Next Article in Journal
Influential Microstructural Descriptors for Predicting Mechanical Properties of Fiber-Reinforced Composites
Next Article in Special Issue
High-Temperature Tribological Behavior of Polyimide Composites with Dual-Phase MoS2/MXene Lubricants: A Synergistic Effect Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Time-Dependent Rheological Behavior and MPS Simulation of Cement–Bentonite Slurries with Hydration Accelerators for Borehole Backfilling Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Potential Use of Residual Powder Generated in Cork Stopper Industry as Valuable Additive to Develop Biomass-Based Composites for Injection Molding
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A New Sulfur-Containing Copolymer Created Through the Thermally Induced Radical Copolymerization of Elemental Sulfur with N2,N2-Diallylmelamine Comonomer for Potential CO2 Capture

by
Dharrinesh Narendiran
1,
Nurul Hazirah Sumadi
1,
Ali Shaan Manzoor Ghumman
2,
Noor Ashikin Mohamad
1,
Mohamed Mahmoud Nasef
1,3,*,
Amin Abbasi
4,* and
Rashid Shamsuddin
5
1
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Malaysia–Japan International Institute of Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia
2
Chemical Engineering Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia
3
Advanced Materials Research Group, Center of Hydrogen Energy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia
4
PRISM Research Institute, Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest, Athlone Campus, University Road, N37 HD68 Athlone, Ireland
5
Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic University of Madinah, Madinah 42351, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Compos. Sci. 2025, 9(7), 362; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9070362
Submission received: 26 May 2025 / Revised: 3 July 2025 / Accepted: 9 July 2025 / Published: 11 July 2025

Abstract

Sulfur-containing polymers are unique sustainable materials with promise for the development of various adsorbents for environmental remediation. However, they have not been explored for CO2 capture despite reports on its ability to decontaminate various aqueous pollutants. This study reports on the single-step synthesis of a diamine-functionalized sulfur-containing copolymer by the thermally induced radical copolymerization of N2,N2-Diallylmelamine (NDAM), a difunctional monomer, with sulfur and explores its use for CO2 capture. The influence of reaction parameters such as the weight ratios of sulfur to NDAM, reaction temperature, time, and the addition of a porogen on the properties of aminated copolymer was investigated. The resulting copolymers were characterized using FTIR, TGA, DSC, SEM, XRD, and BET surface area analyses. The incorporation of NDAM directly imparted amine functionality while stabilizing the polysulfide chains by crosslinking, leading to a thermoset copolymer with an amorphous structure. The addition of a NaCl particle porogen to the S/NDAM mixture generated a mesoporous structure, enabling the resulting copolymer to be tested for CO2 adsorption under varying pressures, leading to an adsorption capacity as high as 517 mg/g at 25 bar. This work not only promotes sustainable hybrid materials that advance green chemistry while aiding CO2 mitigation efforts but also adds value to the abundant amount of sulfur by-products from petroleum refineries.

1. Introduction

In the past few decades, there has been increasingly more attention paid to sustainable development in industries, specifically seeking methods to utilize waste and by-products. This is to reduce the environmental burden and build a circular economy through the transformation of items that would otherwise be discarded into useful products [1]. For instance, elemental sulfur, a by-product of oil and gas refineries produced in millions of tons, is stored in huge stockpiles that are often poorly managed [2]. This leads to major threats to the environment through sulfur leaking into water bodies and being blown into the air as particulates by the wind, affecting human health and disturbing the ecosystem [3]. Thus, elemental sulfur has attracted recent interest as a sustainable feedstock for designing functional materials.
Sulfur-containing copolymers have recently emerged as a novel class of materials with immense potential for substituting petrochemical polymers and the development of advanced eco-friendly materials with tunable properties across various applications [4,5]. These innovative materials leverage the ability of sulfur with its cyclo-octasulfur ring to undergo S-S bond homolytic cleavage to form thiyl radicals (linear S8 atom with terminal bi-radicals) when heated to the molten state, enabling radical polymerization reactions with a variety of vinylic, allylic, and polyfunctional comonomers under solvent- and catalyst-free conditions [6]. This unique polymerization process, also known as inverse vulcanization, imparts exceptional properties to the polysulfides, including electrochemical [7], photocatalytic [8], optical (high refractive index and infrared light transmittance) [9,10,11], self-healing [12], antimicrobial [13,14], and anticorrosive [15] activities; thermo-responsivity [16]; control–release abilities [17]; oleophilicity [18]; the ability to plasticize polymers [19]; adhesion abilities [20]; interfacial modification abilities [21]; thermomechanical and flame retardancy [22]; and affinity to heavy metals [23,24,25] and boron [26]. This allowed for the transformation of oil and gas refinery by-products (i.e., sulfur) into versatile materials that can be designed to contribute to progress in diverse fields such as energy storage; camera, infrared, and thermal imaging applications; decorative plastics; photocatalysis; fertilizers; biomedicine and health care; wastewater treatment (removal of heavy metals and boron, and oil spill cleanup); and many more, as discussed in recent review articles [23,27,28,29,30].
The synthesis of sulfur-containing copolymers has been carried out using various types of alkene-containing comonomers originating from petroleum [27], fatty acids/triglycerides [31], and renewable sources [4,32]. Several petroleum-based vinylic comonomers have been copolymerized with sulfur using inverse vulcanization on many occasions. Styrene [33], vinylbenzyl chloride [34,35], and N-methylimidazole [36] were used to prepare sulfur-containing copolymers with distinctive properties dedicated to desired applications.
The reaction of sulfur with comonomers with diene or more, such as 1,3-diisopropenylbenzene [37,38], divinylbenzene [39,40], 1,3-diethynylbenzene [41], ethylene glycol dimethacrylate [42,43], dicyclopentadiene and 5-ethylidene-2-norbornene [44], and 2,4,6,8-tetramethyl-2,4,6,8-tetravinylcyclotetrasiloxane [45], forms stable crosslinked structures compared to otherwise unstable polysulfides. The diversity of selected crosslinkers aimed to impart appropriate thermal and mechanical properties that meet basic application requirements. Alkyl amines such as 4-vinylaniline [46] and oleylamine [47] were also reported for the preparation of sulfur-containing copolymers with amine pendent groups. Moreover, amine functional prepolymers were prepared from the reaction of elemental sulfur and phenylenediamine to be subsequently reacted with epoxides and other groups to form crosslinked sulfur-containing polymers [48]. Trialkyl amines were also used to promote time-efficient reactions as nucleophilic activators to prepare sulfur-rich copolymer at a low temperature of 110 °C and allow inverse vulcanization of the elemental sulfur with various unreactive crosslinkers [49]. However, there are no reports on the copolymerization of N2,N2-diallylmelamine (NDAM), also known as 2,4-Diamino-6-diallylamino-1,3,5-triazine, as a comonomer with elemental sulfur to form diamine functionalized sulfur-containing copolymer. The advantage of using NDAM as a comonomer is not only to stabilize the polysulfide by crosslinking as a result of the presence of divinyl groups [50] but also to impart affinity (selectivity) to CO2 because of the presence of di-amine groups in its molecular structure [51].
On the other hand, the continued reliance on fossil fuels as a primary energy source led to soaring CO2 emissions and subsequent climate change, underscoring the critical need for intensifying efforts to mitigate it by carbon capture and sequestration [52]. Several methods, including absorption with liquid amine, adsorption, membrane separation, and cryogenic distillation, are widely recognized strategies for the removal of CO2 from various streams. Of all, adsorption is a promising method for CO2 capture due to its versatility, ease of regeneration, scalability, and low energy requirement [53]. Polymeric materials with high performance offer promising adsorbents to improve CO2 capture [54]. However, further improvements in the cost-effectiveness and sustainability of these polymeric materials are essential to deploy them as alternatives to inorganic adsorbents.
Sulfur-containing copolymers were used for environmental applications, mainly wastewater treatment involving the decontamination of heavy metals [23], mercury [24], and boron [26] in addition to oil spill cleanup [18], organic compounds removal (caffeine) [38], and the extraction of gold from waste streams [25]. Despite these uses, the application of sulfur-containing copolymers for CO2 capture has not been explored, and this represents a great opportunity to extend their use in the treatment of pre- and post-combustion different gas streams. Moreover, the idea of using sulfur (a by-product of processing fossil fuel) to clean up gas streams from CO2 is truly circular and offers a novel solution to environmental problems.
To use sulfur-containing copolymers as effective adsorbents, it is essential to introduce porosity into their structure. This is typically achieved by adding a porogen into the raw materials during the synthesis reaction. NaCl was used to create porous structures in sulfur-containing copolymers, enabling their application in various adsorption processes. For instance, porous sulfur copolymers were used for the adsorption of gas-phase mercury [55] and the removal of palladium and mercury salts from water and soil [56]. Furthermore, porous sulfur copolymers synthesized using NaCl particles were evaluated for the adsorption of organic pollutants, such as caffeine [38]. In another study, a mixture of NaCl and urea served as a template to create pores in sulfur copolymers, which were subsequently used for the adsorption of gold from wastewater [25]. Another route involving supercritical CO2 was also used to generate porosity in sulfur-containing copolymers that were tested for mercury adsorption from aqueous solutions [57]. These examples highlight the versatility of porous sulfur-containing copolymers in addressing diverse adsorption challenges.
This study aimed to synthesize sulfur-containing copolymers with amine groups and explore their potential for CO2 capture. The copolymer was prepared by radical polymerization of sulfur with NDAM at molten temperatures with and without NaCl particles to yield an amine-containing crosslinked copolymer with high CO2 selectivity and adsorption capacity. The primary objective was to determine the best combination of reaction parameters such as S/NDAM ratio, temperature, and time. The thermal, structural, and physicochemical properties of the resulting copolymer were evaluated. The sulfur copolymer was made porous by the addition of NaCl particles of different contents, and its efficacy in CO2 adsorption was investigated under various conditions.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

Sulfur powder (assay ≥ 99.0%) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), while N2,N2-Diallylmelamine (NDAM) with a purity of ≥98.0% and an m.p. of 140 °C was supplied by Fischer Scientific (Hampton, NH, USA). NaCl fine particle Double Swallow salt (purity > 99.9%) was obtained from PJ Grocer Sdn Bhd (Petaling Jaya, Malaysia), and CO2 gas of 99.7% purity was utilized for the adsorption studies.

2.2. Synthesis of Sulfur/NDAM Copolymers

The reaction started by placing sulfur (S) powder in a glass vial that was heated in a thermostatic oil bath with an adjustable magnetic stirrer (Zhejiang Lichen Instrument, Shaoxing, China) under continuous stirring. This was followed by the addition of NDAM powder to molten S under continuous stirring until the reaction mixture became homogeneous, with further heating to 145 °C. The weight ratio of S to NDAM was varied in the range of 50:50, 70:30, and 90:10 while keeping the reaction mixture weights to a constant value during all experiments. The molten mixtures were further heated to varying reaction temperatures, ranging from 155 to 175 °C. The reaction was allowed to proceed for different time periods in the range of 20–120 min.
A porous version of the S-containing copolymers was prepared by adding different weight ratios (12.5–50 wt%) of NaCl powder as a porogen to S/NDAM of 50:50 wt%, and the weight of the reaction mixture was kept constant in all trials. After reaction completion, the glass vials were left to cool down to room temperature, and the reaction mixtures were solidified into a dark brownish copolymer. The copolymers were washed four times with warm deionized water to remove the occluded NaCl porogen to obtain a porous structure, then dried to constant weight, and finally weighed. The sulfur-containing copolymers were stored in a tight container and kept under a desiccator for further use. The process for the reaction of S with NDAM is illustrated in Figure 1.

2.3. Characterization of Crosslinked Sulfur Copolymer

An FTIR analysis was carried out by a SHIMADZU IR Tracer-10 spectrometer (Kyoto, Japan) equipped with ATR. The spectra were obtained with 16 scans and a resolution of 4 cm−1 across a frequency range of 500–4000 cm−1. The FESEM analysis of the samples was conducted using a Zeiss SUPRA 55V microscope (Oberkochen, Germany). The sample thermal stability was evaluated using a PerkinElmer STA 6000 simultaneous thermal analyzer (Waltham, MA, USA) at a heating rate of 10 °C/min in a temperature range of 30–700 °C under N2 atmosphere. The melting behavior was analyzed by using a TA Instruments Q2000 thermal analyzer from TA Instruments Company (New Castle, DE, USA) in a N2 environment. The crystalline structure of the samples was examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a PANalytical Empyrean analyzer (Almelo, The Netherlands) at Bragg’s angle in the range of 2–80°. The surface area and pore volume analyses were performed with a Quantachrome Corporation 4000E1 Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analyzer, USA. The samples were degassed at 80 °C for 4 h before analysis.

2.4. CO2 Adsorption Testing

The aminated sulfur-containing copolymer was tested for CO2 adsorption by placing 0.1 g of the sample inside the sample container, and CO2 adsorption equilibrium was assessed using a gravimetric sorption analyzer isoSORP®, supplied by Rubotherm-TA Instruments (New Castle, DE, USA), which is based on a magnetic suspended balance. Prior to measurement, the sample was pretreated at 80 °C for 2 h under vacuum to remove moisture and any impurities. This was followed by buoyancy measurements, which were conducted at 30 °C under vacuum conditions. Subsequently, the adsorption equilibrium measurements were performed at 30 °C under pressure ranging from vacuum to 25 bar, using pure CO2 at a 500 mL/min flow rate. This procedure was repeated for all the samples, and the sorption equilibrium was reached in 50 min. The pressure range of 1–25 bar was selected to evaluate the adsorbent’s potential for capturing CO2 from high-pressure flue gas streams, particularly in industrial applications such as cement plants and waste-to-energy facilities, where pressure swing adsorption (PSA) is commonly employed.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Selection of the Reaction Parameters of Sulfur with NDAM

The effect of reaction parameters, including the S to NDAM ratio (50:50, 70:30, and 90:10), temperature (155–175 °C), and reaction time (20–120 min), was investigated. The temperature increase was handled carefully to reduce the evolution of H2S gas, and this was monitored not only through determination of the copolymer conversion yield (%) and detection of weight loss but also by observing the changes in the color intensity after each experiment.
Figure 2 shows the effects of temperature and reaction time on the conversion yield of S/NDAM 50/50 copolymers. At all temperatures, the conversion yield of S and NDAM in the copolymer decreased as reaction time was prolonged, with such an effect more pronounced at higher temperatures. This is attributed to the increased evolution of H2S gas, a side reaction that intensifies with prolonged heating during inverse vulcanization [58]. The combination of higher temperatures and longer reaction times led to further reductions in conversion yield due to greater gas evolution. The highest conversion yield occurs at 160 °C for all reaction times, after which it declines up to 175 °C. Beyond 170 °C, the 20 min heated sample showed continued copolymer yield loss, while longer reaction durations imparted minimal change. This suggests that most volatile products were released between 160 and 170 °C and was accompanied by further blackening of an already brown copolymer. Based on these results, a temperature of 160 °C and a duration of 120 min were selected for further experiments to ensure high conversion of the reactant with minimal side reactions. It is noteworthy to mention that the level of decrease in the copolymer conversion yield as a result of gas evolution is rather small and falls in the range of 0.5 to 2.75%.
Figure 3 shows a comparison between the conversion yields of S/NDAM copolymers with different initial reactant ratios, and the reactions were conducted at 160 °C for 120 min. As the amount of sulfur increased, the conversion yield remarkably decreased up to 70 wt% S, beyond which it reached a plateau, suggesting that the increase in sulfur content promoted H2S evolution that lowered the conversion. Beyond this point, conversion yield becomes independent of the S/NDAM ratio. This behavior is likely due to changes in the C:H and C:S ratios after polymerization and the accompanied loss of H and S through H2S release, leading to a decrease in C:H and C:S ratios. Therefore, the best combination of parameters that was used to prepare porous samples using NaCl porogen was a weight ratio of 50:50 for S/NDAM, a temperature of 160 °C, and a reaction time of 120 min.
The obtained sulfur-containing copolymer with a diamine group was a brownish-black material, poly(S/NDAM), that was found to be insoluble in all tested solvents, including ethanol, acetone, chloroform, methylene chloride, toluene, DMSO, and DMF, regardless of S content in the copolymer. The insolubility of the copolymer most likely stemmed from the crosslinked network structure formed during the copolymerization of NDAM through its divinyl groups, rendering the obtained material insoluble in most common solvents [59,60,61].

3.2. Chemical Composition of Copolymer

An FTIR analysis was used to provide early evidence of successful reactions between the elemental S and NDAM. Figure 4 presents the FTIR spectra of all synthesized poly(S/NDAM) copolymers alongside elemental S and virgin NDAM as references. The FTIR spectrum of S exhibits a characteristic S–S bending peak at 465 cm−1. Considering the spectrum of the neat NDAM, the spectra of the developed copolymers with varying S concentrations demonstrated distinct peaks at 3311 and 3471 cm−1 corresponding to N–H stretching, while peaks at 1521, 1552 and 1408 cm−1 were assigned for the stretching vibration of C=N of planar triazine rings and the bending deformations of amino-azine. This was coupled with the appearance of the peak at 808 cm−1 resembling the out-of-plane triazine ring bending vibrations, confirming the presence of the triazine and amine functionalities in copolymers [62]. The weak peaks at 2937 and 3140 cm−1 represent the stretching vibration of aliphatic C-H originating from the vinyl group in the NDAM monomer. Notably, no peaks were observed in the 1600–1650 cm−1 range, which is typically associated with vinylic C=C stretching vibration of the vinyl group shown exactly at 1612 cm−1 in the neat NDAM spectrum, suggesting the successful reaction of S with NDAM. Furthermore, the appearance of a new peak at 615 cm−1 was attributed to the out-of-plane bending of C–H adjacent to C–S bonds that further supports the copolymer formation [63]. These findings are consistent with that in the literature [59,64] and confirm the successful reaction of S and NDAM forming a sulfur-containing copolymer.
The EDX analysis of the poly(S/NDAM) copolymer (Figure 5) obtained from the 50/50 wt% reactant ratio revealed that the copolymer sample contains 46.8% polysulfide, which is close to the initial S content in the feed mixture. The signals representing poly(S/NDAM) in the copolymer displayed a content of 53.2%, comprising 34.3, 16.8, and 2.1% for C, N, and O, respectively. The slight decrease in S content in the copolymer compared to its initial amount in the reaction mixture is probably due to a very minor release of H2S and slight decomposition in the copolymer during storage.

3.3. Surface Area and Pore Properties

The BET method was used to determine the surface area, pore volume, and mean pore diameter of poly(S/NDAM) copolymers with various porogen contents using N2 adsorption/desorption measurements, and the obtained results are summarized in Table 1. The increase in NaCl content led to an increase not only in the surface area of the samples but also in the mean pore diameters and total pore volume. The incorporation of NaCl allowed for the formation of mesoporous structures when the copolymer samples were washed with hot water after reaction completion, leading to the formation of mesopores. This structure will have an impact on the level of porosity increase and the accompanied increase in the surface area. These observations are consistent with that from studies reporting on developing S copolymers with increased surfaces using multifunctional monomers containing such porogen [25,55,65]. Moreover, the developed mesoporous structure is likely to affect the adsorption of isothermal behavior when the samples are tested for CO2 capture.
The morphological properties of poly(S/NDAM) copolymers were investigated after adding porogen with FESEM in comparison with the counterpart without porogen, as shown in Figure 6. Figure 6A,D demonstrate the intrinsically low porosity of the poly(S/NDAM) copolymer. When 25 W% of NaCl porogen was used, the sample showed a clearly defined porous structure (Figure 6B,E). Increasing the porogen content to 50 wt% further enhanced the pores’ density and distribution, although all samples retained nanoscale pore features (6C and 6F). These results are consistent with the BET analysis, which showed a progressive increase in surface area of the samples with an increase in the porogen content, confirming the mesoporous nature of the poly(S/NDAM) copolymers.

3.4. Structural Properties

Figure 7 depicts the powdered X-ray diffraction (XRD) diffractogram of elemental S and the poly(S/NDAM) copolymer. The crystalline nature of S is evident from the α-S8 crystalline peaks appearing in the diffractogram of S [66]. Whereas the copolymers prepared using 50 and 70 wt.% S showed an amorphous nature, with no or less intense peaks resembling the α-S8 crystalline structure from 20-30 2θ, the peaks representing α-S8 crystalline appeared in the diffractogram of the copolymer synthesized using 90 wt.% S, indicating the presence of unreacted S. These observations demonstrate that S has been successfully converted into a stable S-S backbone copolymer using NDAM, and no unreacted S is observed in the copolymer produced with 50 wt% S and very little in the 70 wt% S-containing copolymer. The amount of unreacted S increased with an increase in initial S concentration, which aligns with our earlier observations [59].

3.5. Thermal Properties

TGA is crucial for understanding the thermal stability and compositional properties of copolymers. By analyzing different percent compositions, TGA helps determine how each component affects the overall thermal behavior of the material. Figure 8 and Figure 9 present the TGA and DTG thermograms of poly(S/NDAM) copolymers together with virgin elemental S as a reference.
The poly(S/NDAM) copolymers, regardless of their percent composition, show similar thermal stability at around 160 °C, while virgin S starts to degrade above 200 °C. This trend is in line with that found in the literature, confirming the formation of a polymeric structure with S backbone [59,67]. Sulfur, due to its simple molecular structure, fully degrades at around 330 °C while the copolymers show remaining weights up to 1000 °C. While the 90/10 sample shows an almost plateau trend at higher temperatures, meaning that it has almost reached its final weight, the other two copolymer samples, i.e., 50/50 and 70/30, show a small but negative slope at 1000 °C, showing that their degradation will continue after this temperature for a while.
In S-containing polymers and based on the type of petroleum-based comonomer, there are usually two (sometimes three or more) degradation steps, consisting of a first sharp degradation of the S content, followed by degradation of the organic component [59,68]. The DTG graphs show similar onset temperatures for the second degradation step at 245, 244, and 252 °C for copolymer samples obtained from the 50/50, 70/30, and 90/10 (S/NDAM) combinations, respectively. This means the initial S content in the reaction feed does not alter the thermal stability of the copolymers. The accompanied decomposition onset is at 36, 48.2, and 67.7% of weight loss corresponding to S content, while the ideal values must be 50, 70, and 90%. The S content inside the samples is lower than that in the reaction feed, and this is most likely due to the difference in the reactivity of the reactants. Nevertheless, these results are very interesting since all resulting copolymers show a similar ratio of the actual S content in the polymers versus the initial S content in the reaction feed, i.e., 0.72, 0.69, and 0.75 for the 50/50, 70/30, and 90/10 combinations, expressing a mediocre but uniform S conversion rate for all the samples.
To further investigate the effect of different reaction times on the composition of the final product, different reaction times were generated by the important sample obtained from the 50/50 poly(S/NDAM) samples, and the TGA thermograms can be seen in Figure 10. The thermographs of the samples do not deviate from each other significantly. The small distortion at higher temperatures is most probably due to test errors and hence is negligible. These results suggest that the reaction reaches equilibrium in a very short time, i.e., 20 min.
DSC is essential for identifying unreacted elemental S in inverse vulcanized polymers. It detects crystalline S by measuring heat flow during phase transitions, pinpointing sulfur at the melting point. The DSC thermograms of the poly(S/NDAM) copolymers together with virgin S are presented in Figure 11. Sulfur shows two different melting points, attributed to its two different crystalline structures at around 106 and 117 °C, which are in excellent agreement with that in the literature [69,70]. On the other hand, S-containing polymers are, in general, amorphous in nature and hence are not expected to demonstrate any melting or cold crystallization points during a heating step [19,30]. In the case of poly(S/NDAM) copolymers made of 50/50, this expectation is satisfied, indicating a full conversion of elemental S into the polymeric structure; nonetheless, poly(S/NDAM) copolymers made of 70/30 and 90/10 show melting peaks with low intensity, corresponding to those of elemental S, suggesting the presence of some unreacted S inside the copolymer bulk. The addition of 10 wt% NDAM to 90 wt% S remarkably reduced the enthalpy of melting, which was further remarkably decreased by the increase in NDAM to 30 wt% in the copolymer. This behavior suggests that NDAM comonomer is capable of stabilizing polysulfide chains, and such stabilization is effective at a content close to 70 wt%. This trend can be comprehended based on previous reports indicating that in inverse vulcanized polymers, vinylic comonomers, despite their structures, are not capable of stabilizing a high percentage of polysulfide chains. This leads to the presence of some unreacted and/or some reacted but depolymerized polysulfide chains in the bulk of poly(S/NDAM) copolymers made using higher percentages of initial S loading [5,71].
The fully amorphous 50/50 and 70/30 copolymers show Tg values of 68 and 74 °C, respectively. This increase in the glass transition temperature by increasing the initial S content shows that more sulfur results in more entanglements in the structure of the copolymers, making them a bit more difficult to soften. It is necessary to mention that these polymers seem to have relatively high Tg values compared with some of the reported sulfur-containing polymers, making them suitable for applications with a higher range of temperature requirements [43,59,72]. The 90/10 poly(S/NDAM) copolymer, on the other hand, shows no Tg under the applied DSC thermal treatment conditions, and this is most probably due to the low sensitivity of the equipment in detecting the Tg of the polymeric chains in the presence of a higher percentage of unreacted S.

3.6. Evaluation of Aminated Sulfur-Containing Copolymer as Adsorbent for CO2 Adsorption

3.6.1. Effect of Sulfur Content

The effect of S/NDAM ratio (without porogen) on the CO2 adsorption capacity of the aminated S-containing copolymer at a pressure of 1 bar is presented in Figure 12. The CO2 adsorption capacity was found to increase gradually with the decrease in S content in the copolymer due to the incorporation of more amine sites into the material with the increase in NDAM content. However, the overall adsorption values remained low, and this is likely due to the copolymer’s bulky and dense structure blocking access to many amine sites. To overcome this problem, NaCl was introduced to S and NDAM reactants at varying amounts as a porogen to enable the formation of a porous structure in the obtained copolymer.

3.6.2. Effect of Porogen Content on CO2 Adsorption Capacity

Figure 13 shows the effect of porogen content on the adsorption capacity of S-containing copolymers. The CO2 adsorption capacity remarkably improved with the addition of NaCl porogen. For instance, it increased from 4.5 to 19.0 mg/g with the variation in NaCl amounts from 0 to 50 wt%. It was reported that the CO2 adsorption capacity of mesoporous materials is highly dependent on the micropore volume and micropore surface area [73]. Thus, this behavior can be attributed to the increase in the copolymer’s surface area and mean pore diameter, leading to greater access to the amine sites, facilitating gas–solid interactions, and boosting the adsorption capacity. The level of adsorption capacity of the present poly(S/NDAM) copolymer adsorbent (50 wt% NaCl) is on par with that of silica gel grafted with a 3-aminopropyl group [74], mesoporous SBA-15 modified with ethylene diamine [75], and mesoporous silica loaded with pentaethylenehexamine [76].
To understand the adsorption behavior of the poly(S/NDAM) copolymer, it is important to recognize that CO2 acts as a Lewis acid, and its adsorption is affected by the chemically stable, electron-withdrawing triazine rings and the Lewis basic diamine functionalities within the adsorbent copolymer. These features promote a chemisorption mechanism through acid–base interactions [77].
Furthermore, the adsorption of CO2 under dry conditions most likely led to the formation of triazine-ammonium carbamate, which occurs when a CO2 molecule is adsorbed on a closely spaced pair of amine groups [78]. The process for the adsorption of CO2 on the present diamine-containing adsorbent and subsequent carbamate formation is illustrated in Figure 14.
It is noteworthy to mention that unlike amine physically impregnated adsorbents, which were tested for low-pressure uses and reviewed elsewhere [79], the diamine in the present adsorbent (originating from NDAM) that was chemically bonded to the polysulfide chains is mostly suitable for CO2 capture in high-pressure applications involving the PSA process.

3.6.3. Effect of Pressure on CO2 Adsorption

The effect of pressure on the CO2 adsorption capacity of the S copolymer composed of 50/50 S/NDAM made porous by adding 50% NaCl is presented in Figure 15. As shown, the adsorption capacity increases slowly at low pressures and exponentially at higher pressures (increased from 4 to 517 mg/g at 25 bar) without reaching a saturation plateau, reflecting an adsorption isotherm close to type III according to the IUPAC classification [80,81]. This trend reflects the mesoporous structure present in the poly(S/NDAM) copolymer that was likely accompanied by an initially limited interaction between the CO2 and solid adsorbent material caused by steric hindrance. The adsorption capacity subsequently increased with the pressure rise due to the enhancement of gas penetration into the mesoporous structure and subsequent improvement in the access to the internal amine sites. This was likely accompanied by a transition to physisorption, forming multilayer adsorption at higher pressures. The pressure-dependent adsorption demonstrated in this study is consistent with the CO2 adsorption result of Si-MCM-41 under varying pressure [73,82].
The CO2 adsorption capacity of the poly(S/NDAM) copolymer was compared with several chemically modified aminated adsorbents possessing mesoporous structures, as shown in Table 2. The present adsorbent exhibited a CO2 adsorption capacity on par with that of mesoporous materials such as meso-silica modified with methyl diethanolamine (MDEA) and SBA-15 modified with 3-aminopropyltrimethoxysilane (APTMS), both tested at 1 bar and 30 °C while the adsorption was primarily driven by chemisorption. This behavior contrasts with that of other adsorbents such as MCM-48 modified with silane and diethanolamine (EDA), and silica gel modified with APTMS/TEPA both of which attained high surface areas and exhibited enhanced adsorption (at 1 bar and 70 °C) by combining chemisorption and physisorption. However, the current adsorbent showed a high CO2 adsorption capacity of 519 mg/g at 25 bar, indicating its strong potential for high-pressure applications.

4. Conclusions

Sulfur-containing copolymers with diamine groups were successfully prepared by thermally induced radical copolymerization of elemental S with difunctional NDAM. The reaction parameters, including S and NDAM ratio, temperature, and reaction time, were varied to identify the best parameter combination for achieving maximum copolymerization. The presence of triazine in the copolymer was evident from the peaks at 1521, 1552, and 1408 cm−1 corresponding to C=N stretching in the planar triazine rings and bending of the amino-azine groups, coupled with the peak at 808 cm−1 resembling out-of-plane bending of the triazine rings, as revealed by FTIR. The EDX analysis of the poly(S/NDAM) copolymer proved the presence of a composition close to S in the feed ratio. The incorporation of NaCl allowed the formation of a mesoporous structure and imparted a higher surface area, as suggested by the BET and FESEM analyses. The XRD analysis demonstrated the complete conversion of elemental S and NDAM of 50/50 wt% in the copolymer with a stable S-S backbone copolymer. The poly(S/NDAM) copolymers demonstrated similar thermal stability at around 160 °C, regardless of their percent ratio, according to the TGA analysis. The DSC results revealed that the crosslinked poly(S/NDAM) copolymer is an amorphous material with a Tg of 68 °C at a 50/50 reactant ratio. The obtained copolymer was insoluble in the tested solvents. The addition of NaCl porogen led to the formation of a mesoporous structure that allowed the obtained copolymer to be used as an adsorbent, showing remarkably enhanced CO2 adsorption capacity from 4 to 517 mg/g with a pressure increase from 1 to 25 bar, suggesting its suitability for CO2 capture. The adsorption isotherm suggested that CO2 is adsorbed by chemisorption at low pressure, which was accompanied by physisorption when the pressure was increased. More ongoing work is being carried out to further investigate the CO2 adsorption isothermal and kinetic behaviors. This study not only promotes a green chemistry approach involving waste sulfur utilization for CO2 capture but also contributes to environmental sustainability and circular economy advancements.

Author Contributions

This study was conceived and designed by M.M.N. Material preparation and data collection were performed by D.N. and N.H.S. The data analysis was performed by A.A., A.S.M.G., N.A.M., R.S., and M.M.N. The first draft of the manuscript was written by M.M.N. and A.A. Previous versions of the manuscript were reviewed by A.S.M.G., N.A.M., R.S., and M.M.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

M.M. Nasef wishes to acknowledge the financial support from the UTM R&D fund under cost center R.K130000.7743.4J758.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yang, M.; Chen, L.; Wang, J.; Msigwa, G.; Osman, A.I.; Fawzy, S.; Rooney, D.W.; Yap, P.S. Circular Economy Strategies for Combating Climate Change and Other Environmental Issues. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2022, 21, 55–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wagenfeld, J.G.; Al-Ali, K.; Almheiri, S.; Slavens, A.F.; Calvet, N. Sustainable Applications Utilizing Sulfur, a by-Product from Oil and Gas Industry: A State-of-the-Art Review. Waste Manag. 2019, 95, 78–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Adebiyi, F.M. Air Quality and Management in Petroleum Refining Industry: A Review. Environ. Chem. Ecotoxicol. 2022, 4, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Abbasi, A.; Nasef, M.M.; Yahya, W.Z.N. Copolymerization of Vegetable Oils and Bio-Based Monomers with Elemental Sulfur: A New Promising Route for Bio-Based Polymers. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2019, 13, 100158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shen, H.; Zheng, B.; Zhang, H. A Decade Development of Inverse Vulcanization Towards Green and Sustainable Practices. Polym. Rev. 2024, 64, 1211–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Salman, M.K.; Karabay, B.; Karabay, L.C.; Cihaner, A. Elemental Sulfur-Based Polymeric Materials: Synthesis and Characterization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, Y.; Griebel, J.J.; Dirlam, P.T.; Nguyen, N.A.; Glass, R.S.; Mackay, M.E.; Char, K.; Pyun, J. Inverse Vulcanization of Elemental Sulfur and Styrene for Polymeric Cathodes in Li-S Batteries. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2017, 55, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gao, L.; Zhou, C.; Wang, R.; Lan, F.; An, B.; Huang, X.; Zhang, X. Unveiling Inverse Vulcanized Polymers as Metal-Free, Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalysts for Cross-Coupling Reactions. Chinese Chem. Lett. 2024, 35, 108832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Griebel, J.J.; Namnabat, S.; Kim, E.T.; Himmelhuber, R.; Moronta, D.H.; Chung, W.J.; Simmonds, A.G.; Kim, K.J.; Van Der Laan, J.; Nguyen, N.A.; et al. New Infrared Transmitting Material via Inverse Vulcanization of Elemental Sulfur to Prepare High Refractive Index Polymers. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3014–3018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Boyd, D.A.; Nguyen, V.Q.; McClain, C.C.; Kung, F.H.; Baker, C.C.; Myers, J.D.; Hunt, M.P.; Kim, W.; Sanghera, J.S. Optical Properties of a Sulfur-Rich Organically Modified Chalcogenide Polymer Synthesized via Inverse Vulcanization and Containing an Organometallic Comonomer. ACS Macro Lett. 2019, 8, 113–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wuliu, Y.; Dong, W.; Huang, G.; Xie, H.; Yao, P.; Tan, J.; Mu, K.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Wang, M.; et al. Sulfur-Rich Norbornadiene-Derived Infrared Transparent Polymers by Inverse Vulcanization. Angew. Chem. 2025, 137, e202419446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yang, H.; Zhang, J.; Huang, W.; Zhang, G. Transforming Element Sulfur to High Performance Closed-Loop Recyclable Polymer via Proton Transfer Enabled Anionic Hybrid Copolymerization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025, 64, e202414244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dop, R.A.; Neill, D.R.; Hasell, T. Antibacterial Activity of Inverse Vulcanized Polymers. Biomacromolecules 2021, 22, 5223–5233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Smith, J.A.; Mulhall, R.; Goodman, S.; Fleming, G.; Allison, H.; Raval, R.; Hasell, T. Investigating the Antibacterial Properties of Inverse Vulcanized Sulfur Polymers. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 5229–5234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Upton, R.L.; Dop, R.A.; Sadler, E.; Lunt, A.M.; Neill, D.R.; Hasell, T.; Crick, C.R. Investigating the Viability of Sulfur Polymers for the Fabrication of Photoactive, Antimicrobial, Water Repellent Coatings. J. Mater. Chem. B 2022, 10, 4153–4162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yang, Z.; Yan, P.; Li, X.; Miao, C.; Cai, S.; Ji, W.; Song, M.; Dodd, L.J.; Wu, X.; Hasell, T.; et al. Sulfur-Rich Polymers with Heating/UV Light-Responsive Shape Memory and Temperature-Modulated Self-Healing. Polym. Chem. 2023, 14, 3686–3694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Manzoor Ghumman, A.S.; Shamsuddin, R.; Nasef, M.M.; Maucieri, C.; Rehman, O.U.; Rosman, A.A.; Haziq, M.I.; Abbasi, A. Degradable Slow-Release Fertilizer Composite Prepared by Ex Situ Mixing of Inverse Vulcanized Copolymer with Urea. Agronomy 2022, 12, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.Y.; Wang, L.; Zan, X.; Zhang, L. Density-Adjustable Bio-Based Polysulfide Composite Prepared by Inverse Vulcanization and Bio-Based Fillers. Polymers 2020, 12, 2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Abbasi, A.; Taghinezhad, S.F.; Mansourieh, M.; Xu, H.; Nasef, M.M.; Major, I. Inverse Vulcanized Sulfur-Styrene Polymers as Effective Plasticizers for Polystyrene. Polym. Test. 2024, 140, 108625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fan, J.; Ju, C.; Fan, S.; Li, X.; Zhang, Z.; Hadjichristidis, N. Inverse Vulcanization of Aziridines: Enhancing Polysulfides for Superior Mechanical Strength and Adhesive Performance. Angew. Chem. 2025, 137, e202418764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, S.; Liu, P.; Guo, M.; Yu, Q.; Hu, Y.; Tang, Z.; Guo, B.; Zhou, G. Dual Functions of Inverse Vulcanized Copolymers as Both Vulcanizator and Interfacial Modifier for Improving the Mechanical Properties of Silica Reinforced Rubber Composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2023, 239, 110075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kang, K.S.; Phan, A.; Olikagu, C.; Lee, T.; Loy, D.A.; Kwon, M.; Paik, H.; Hong, S.J.; Bang, J.; Parker, W.O.; et al. Segmented Polyurethanes and Thermoplastic Elastomers from Elemental Sulfur with Enhanced Thermomechanical Properties and Flame Retardancy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 22900–22907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Müller, F.G.; Lisboa, L.S.; Chalker, J.M. Inverse Vulcanized Polymers for Sustainable Metal Remediation. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2023, 7, 2300010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sun, Y.; Yang, C.; Fu, Y.; Guo, T.; Yan, G.; Hu, J. Sulfur-Containing Adsorbent Made by Inverse Vulcanization of Sulfur/Oleylamine/Potato Starch for Efficient Removal of Hg(II) Ions. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 109806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ren, Z.; Jiang, X.; Liu, L.; Yin, C.; Wang, S.; Yang, X. Modification of High-sulfur Polymer Using a Mixture Porogen and Its Application as Advanced Adsorbents for Au(III) from Wastewater. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 328, 115437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Abbasi, A.; Yahya, W.Z.N.; Nasef, M.M.; Moniruzzaman, M.; Ghumman, A.S.M.; Afolabi, H.K. Boron Removal by Glucamine-Functionalized Inverse Vulcanized Sulfur Polymer. React. Funct. Polym. 2022, 177, 105311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cherumukkil, S.; Agrawal, S.; Jasra, R.V. Sulfur Polymer as Emerging Advanced Materials: Synthesis and Applications. ChemistrySelect 2023, 8, e202204428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Amna, R.; Alhassan, S.M. A Comprehensive Exploration of Polysulfides, From Synthesis Techniques to Diverse Applications and Future Frontiers. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2024, 6, 4350–4377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lim, J.; Pyun, J.; Char, K. Recent Approaches for the Direct Use of Elemental Sulfur in the Synthesis and Processing of Advanced Materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 3249–3258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. James Dodd, L. Inverse Vulcanisation: A New Starter’s Guide to an Emerging Field. RSC Appl. Polym. 2025, 3, 10–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Smith, A.D.; Tennyson, A.G.; Smith, R.C. Sulfur-Containing Polymers Prepared from Fatty Acid-Derived Monomers: Application of Atom-Economical Thiol-Ene/Thiol-Yne Click Reactions and Inverse Vulcanization Strategies. Sustain. Chem. 2020, 1, 209–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yue, T.J.; Ren, W.M.; Lu, X.B. Copolymerization Involving Sulfur-Containing Monomers. Chem. Rev. 2023, 123, 14038–14083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pyun, J.; Carrozza, C.F.; Silvano, S.; Boggioni, L.; Losio, S.; de Angelis, A.R.; O’Neil Parker, W. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Structural Characterization of Sulfur-Derived Copolymers from Inverse Vulcanization. Part 1: Styrene. J. Polym. Sci. 2022, 60, 3471–3477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gomez, I.; De Anastro, A.F.; Leonet, O.; Blazquez, J.A.; Grande, H.-J.; Pyun, J.; Mecerreyes, D. Sulfur Polymers Meet Poly(Ionic Liquid)s: Bringing New Properties to Both Polymer Families. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2018, 39, 1800529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Abbasi, A.; Nasef, M.M.; Yahya, W.Z.N.; Moniruzzaman, M.; Ghumman, A.S.M. Preparation and Characterization of Sulfur-Vinylbenzyl Chloride Polymer under Optimized Reaction Conditions Using Inverse Vulcanization. Eur. Polym. J. 2021, 143, 110202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, Y.; Kleine, T.S.; Carothers, K.J.; Phan, D.D.; Glass, R.S.; Mackay, M.E.; Char, K.; Pyun, J. Functionalized Chalcogenide Hybrid Inorganic/Organic Polymers (CHIPs) via Inverse Vulcanization of Elemental Sulfur and Vinylanilines. Polym. Chem. 2018, 9, 2290–2294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chung, W.J.; Griebel, J.J.; Kim, E.T.; Yoon, H.; Simmonds, A.G.; Ji, H.J.; Dirlam, P.T.; Glass, R.S.; Wie, J.J.; Nguyen, N.A.; et al. The Use of Elemental Sulfur as an Alternative Feedstock for Polymeric Materials. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 518–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Diniz, V.; Bear, J.C.; Rath, S.; Crick, C.R. Porous Sulfur Polymers for Effective Aqueous-Phase Organic Contaminant Removal. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 8144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wadi, V.S.; Jena, K.K.; Khawaja, S.Z.; Ranagraj, V.M.; Alhassan, S.M. Preparation and Processing of Porous Sulfur Foams Having Low Thermal Conductivity. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 4397–4403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Arslan, M.; Kiskan, B.; Cengiz, E.C.; Demir-Cakan, R.; Yagci, Y. Inverse Vulcanization of Bismaleimide and Divinylbenzene by Elemental Sulfur for Lithium Sulfur Batteries. Eur. Polym. J. 2016, 80, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sun, Z.; Xiao, M.; Wang, S.; Han, D.; Song, S.; Chen, G.; Meng, Y. Sulfur-Rich Polymeric Materials with Semi-Interpenetrating Network Structure as a Novel Lithium-Sulfur Cathode. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 9280–9286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, H.; Zhang, B.; Dop, R.; Yan, P.; Neale, A.R.; Hardwick, L.J.; Hasell, T. Oxygen Heteroatom Enhanced Sulfur-Rich Polymers Synthesized by Inverse Vulcanization for High-Performance Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. J. Power Sources 2022, 545, 231921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yan, P.; Wang, H.; Dodd, L.J.; Hasell, T. Processable Crosslinked Terpolymers Made from Elemental Sulfur with Wide Range of Thermal and Mechanical Properties. Commun. Mater. 2023, 4, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Smith, J.A.; Wu, X.; Berry, N.G.; Hasell, T. High Sulfur Content Polymers: The Effect of Crosslinker Structure on Inverse Vulcanization. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2018, 56, 1777–1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Diniz, V.; Bear, J.C.; Rath, S.; Crick, C.R. UV-Stable Photoactive Superhydrophobic Coatings Utilizing “Inverse Vulcanization” Sulfur Polymers. Surf. Interfaces 2024, 51, 104691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Parker, D.J.; Jones, H.A.; Petcher, S.; Cervini, L.; Griffin, J.M.; Akhtar, R.; Hasell, T. Low Cost and Renewable Sulfur-Polymers by Inverse Vulcanisation, and Their Potential for Mercury Capture. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 11682–11692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kim, E.T.; Chung, W.J.; Lim, J.; Johe, P.; Glass, R.S.; Pyun, J.; Char, K. One-Pot Synthesis of PbS NP/Sulfur-Oleylamine Copolymer Nanocomposites via the Copolymerization of Elemental Sulfur with Oleylamine. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 3617–3623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Karayilan, M.; Kleine, T.S.; Carothers, K.J.; Griebel, J.J.; Frederick, K.M.; Loy, D.A.; Glass, R.S.; Mackay, M.E.; Char, K.; Pyun, J. Chalcogenide Hybrid Inorganic/Organic Polymer Resins: Amine Functional Prepolymers from Elemental Sulfur. J. Polym. Sci. 2020, 58, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hwang, J.H.; Lee, J.M.; Seo, J.H.; Noh, G.Y.; Byun, W.; Kim, S.; Lee, W.; Park, S.; Kim, D.G.; Kim, Y.S. Inverse Vulcanization of Elemental Sulfur Catalyzed by Trialkyl Amines. Green Chem. 2023, 25, 4641–4646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Badrossamay, M.R.; Sun, G. A Study of Radical Graft Copolymerization on Polypropylene during Extrusion Using Two Peroxide Initiators. Polym. Int. 2010, 59, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hack, J.; Maeda, N.; Meier, D.M. Review on CO2 Capture Using Amine-Functionalized Materials. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 39520–39530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nunes, L.J.R. The Rising Threat of Atmospheric CO2: A Review on the Causes, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies. Environments 2023, 10, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Odunlami, O.A.A.; Vershima, D.A.A.; Oladimeji, T.E.E.; Nkongho, S.; Ogunlade, S.K.K.; Fakinle, B.S.S. Advanced Techniques for the Capturing and Separation of CO2—A Review. Results Eng. 2022, 15, 100512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sattari, A.; Ramazani, A.; Aghahosseini, H.; Aroua, M.K. The Application of Polymer Containing Materials in CO2 Capturing via Absorption and Adsorption Methods. J. CO2 Util. 2021, 48, 101526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Abraham, A.M.; Kumar, S.V.; Alhassan, S.M. Porous Sulphur Copolymer for Gas-Phase Mercury Removal and Thermal Insulation. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 332, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Crockett, M.P.; Evans, A.M.; Worthington, M.J.H.; Albuquerque, I.S.; Slattery, A.D.; Gibson, C.T.; Campbell, J.A.; Lewis, D.A.; Bernardes, G.J.L.; Chalker, J.M. Sulfur-Limonene Polysulfide: A Material Synthesized Entirely from Industrial By-Products and Its Use in Removing Toxic Metals from Water and Soil. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1714–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hasell, T.; Parker, D.J.; Jones, H.A.; McAllister, T.; Howdle, S.M. Porous Inverse Vulcanised Polymers for Mercury Capture. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 5383–5386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yan, P.; Zhao, W.; McBride, F.; Cai, D.; Dale, J.; Hasell, T. Mechanochemical Synthesis of Inverse Vulcanized Polymers. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 4824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ghumman, A.S.M.; Nasef, M.M.; Shamsuddin, M.R.; Abbasi, A. Evaluation of Properties of Sulfur-Based Polymers Obtained by Inverse Vulcanization: Techniques and Challenges. Polym. Polym. Compos. 2020, 29, 1333–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kleine, T.S.; Nguyen, N.A.; Anderson, L.E.; Namnabat, S.; Lavilla, E.A.; Showghi, S.A.; Dirlam, P.T.; Arrington, C.B.; Manchester, M.S.; Schwiegerling, J.; et al. High Refractive Index Copolymers with Improved Thermomechanical Properties via the Inverse Vulcanization of Sulfur and 1,3,5-Triisopropenylbenzene. ACS Macro Lett. 2016, 5, 1152–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ren, Y.; Shui, H.; Peng, C.; Liu, H.; Hu, Y. Solubility of Elemental Sulfur in Pure Organic Solvents and Organic Solvent–Ionic Liquid Mixtures from 293.15 to 353.15 K. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2011, 312, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chen, Z.; Sun, Y. Antimicrobial Polymers Containing Melamine Derivatives. II. Biocidal Polymers Derived from 2-Vinyl-4,6-Diamino-1,3,5-Triazine. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2005, 43, 4089–4098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ghumman, A.S.M.; Shamsuddin, M.R.; Nasef, M.M.; Yahya, W.Z.N.; Ayoub, M.; Cheah, B.; Abbasi, A. Synthesis and Characterization of Sustainable Inverse Vulcanized Copolymers from Non-Edible Oil. ChemistrySelect 2021, 6, 1180–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Liu, C.; Dai, Z.; Zhou, R.; Ke, Q.; Huang, C. Fabrication of Polypropylene-g-(Diallylamino Triazine) Bifunctional Nonwovens with Antibacterial and Air Filtration Activities by Reactive Extrusion and Melt-Blown Technology. J. Chem. 2019, 2019, 3435095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Amna, R.; Alhassan, S.M. Exploring Porous Sulfur Copolymers for Efficient Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Wastewater: A Computational Study. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2024, 138, 365–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Boyd, D.A. Schwefel in Der Modernen Materialwissenschaft. Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 15712–15729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Shaan, A.; Ghumman, M.; Shamsuddin, R.; Nasef, M.M.; Krivoborodov, E.G.; Ahmad, S.; Zanin, A.A.; Mezhuev, Y.O.; Abbasi, A.; Sabatini, V.; et al. A Degradable Inverse Vulcanized Copolymer as a Coating Material for Urea Produced under Optimized Conditions. Polymers 2021, 13, 4040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Abbasi, A.; Nasef, M.M.; Yahya, W.Z.N. Sulfur Based Polymers by Inverse Vulcanization: A Novel Path to Foster Green Chemistry. Green Mater. 2020, 8, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Abbasi, A.; Yahya, W.Z.N.; Nasef, M.M.; Moniruzzaman, M.; Ghumman, A.S.M. Copolymerization of Palm Oil with Sulfur Using Inverse Vulcanization to Boost the Palm Oil Industry. Polym. Polym. Compos. 2021, 29, S1446–S1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Abbasi, A.; Nasef, M.M.; Yahya, W.Z.N.; Moniruzzaman, M.; Ghumman, A.S. Preparation and Characterization of Green Polymer by Copolymerization of Corn Oil and Sulphur at Molten State. Polym. Polym. Compos. 2020, 29, 1179–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ghumman, A.S.M.; Shamsuddin, R.; Nasef, M.M.; Nisa Yahya, W.Z.; Abbasi, A. Optimization of Synthesis of Inverse Vulcanized Copolymers from Rubber Seed Oil Using Response Surface Methodology. Polymer 2021, 219, 123553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Saini, P.; Sandhu, N. A Review on Use of Elemental Sulphur in the Synthesis of Sulphur-Based Polymers. Mater. Today Proc. 2023; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Fadillah, G.; Saleh, T.A. Advances in Mesoporous Material for Adsorption and Photoconversion of CO2 in Environmental Pollution: Clean Environment and Clean Energy. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2022, 29, 100812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Leal, O.; Bolívar, C.; Ovalles, C.; García, J.J.; Espidel, Y. Reversible Adsorption of Carbon Dioxide on Amine Surface-Bonded Silica Gel. Inorganica Chim. Acta 1995, 240, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zheng, F.; Tran, D.N.; Busche, B.J.; Fryxell, G.E.; Addleman, R.S.; Zemanian, T.S.; Aardahl, C.L. Ethylenediamine-Modified SBA-15 as Regenerable CO2 Sorbent. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 3099–3105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wei, L.; Gao, Z.; Jing, Y.; Wang, Y. Adsorption of CO2 from Simulated Flue Gas on Pentaethylenehexamine-Loaded Mesoporous Silica Support Adsorbent. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 14965–14974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gomes, R.; Bhanja, P.; Bhaumik, A. A Triazine-Based Covalent Organic Polymer for Efficient CO2 Adsorption. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 10050–10053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Young, J.; García-Díez, E.; Garcia, S.; Van Der Spek, M. The Impact of Binary Water–CO2 Isotherm Models on the Optimal Performance of Sorbent-Based Direct Air Capture Processes. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 5377–5394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yu, C.H.; Huang, C.H.; Tan, C.S. A Review of CO2 Capture by Absorption and Adsorption. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2012, 12, 745–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ambroz, F.; Macdonald, T.J.; Martis, V.; Parkin, I.P.; Ambroz, F.; Macdonald, T.J.; Parkin, I.P.; Martis, V. Evaluation of the BET Theory for the Characterization of Meso and Microporous MOFs. Small Methods 2018, 2, 1800173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mukhtar, A.; Mellon, N.; Saqib, S.; Lee, S.P.; Bustam, M.A. Extension of BET Theory to CO2 Adsorption Isotherms for Ultra-Microporosity of Covalent Organic Polymers. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ramli, A.; Ahmed, S.; Yusup, S. Adsorption Behaviour of Si-MCM-41 for CO2: Effect of Pressure and Temperature on Adsorption. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2014, 39, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wang, X.; Guo, Q.; Zhao, J.; Chen, L. Mixed Amine-Modified MCM-41 Sorbents for CO2 Capture. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2015, 37, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wang, X.; Chen, L.; Zeng, W.; Kong, X. CO2 Adsorption of Aminopropyltrimethoxysilane-and-Tetraethylenepentamine-Co-Modified Mesoporous Silica Gel. Coatings 2025, 15, 554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Borcănescu, S.; Popa, A.; Verdeș, O.; Suba, M. Functionalized Ordered Mesoporous MCM-48 Silica: Synthesis, Characterization and Adsorbent for CO2 Capture. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Boonmatoon, P.; Nokpho, P.; Piumsomboon, P.; Chalermsinsuwan, B. Enhanced CO2 Capture Performance Using Methyl Diethanolamine-Functionalized Silica Gels: Assessing CO2 Capture Capacity. Appl. Environ. Res. 2025, 47, 003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Li, J.; Tsunoji, N.; Kumar, R.; Sukmana, N.C.; Sadakane, M. Minimizing Usage of Silane Coupling Agent for Amine-Grafted Mesoporous Silica CO2 Adsorbent. J. Porous Mater. 2024, 31, 1289–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Process for the preparation of the crosslinked copolymer by the reaction of S with NDAM.
Figure 1. Process for the preparation of the crosslinked copolymer by the reaction of S with NDAM.
Jcs 09 00362 g001
Figure 2. Effects of temperature and reaction time on the conversion yield of the copolymer at a S/NDAM ratio of 50:50.
Figure 2. Effects of temperature and reaction time on the conversion yield of the copolymer at a S/NDAM ratio of 50:50.
Jcs 09 00362 g002
Figure 3. Effect of different initial reactant ratios on the conversion yield of S/NDAM copolymers at 160 °C for 120 min.
Figure 3. Effect of different initial reactant ratios on the conversion yield of S/NDAM copolymers at 160 °C for 120 min.
Jcs 09 00362 g003
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of virgin S and developed poly(S/NDAM) copolymers.
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of virgin S and developed poly(S/NDAM) copolymers.
Jcs 09 00362 g004
Figure 5. EDX analysis of poly(S/NDAM) copolymer obtained at 50/50 wt%.
Figure 5. EDX analysis of poly(S/NDAM) copolymer obtained at 50/50 wt%.
Jcs 09 00362 g005
Figure 6. SEM images of the poly(S/NDAM) copolymer at 50/50 (w/w) (left, 5.00 Kx and right, 30 Kx) with no porogen (A,D), 25 wt% NaCl porogen (B,E), and 50 wt% NaCl porogen (C,F).
Figure 6. SEM images of the poly(S/NDAM) copolymer at 50/50 (w/w) (left, 5.00 Kx and right, 30 Kx) with no porogen (A,D), 25 wt% NaCl porogen (B,E), and 50 wt% NaCl porogen (C,F).
Jcs 09 00362 g006
Figure 7. p-XRD diffractogram of virgin S and poly(S/NDAM) copolymers with varying S concentrations.
Figure 7. p-XRD diffractogram of virgin S and poly(S/NDAM) copolymers with varying S concentrations.
Jcs 09 00362 g007
Figure 8. TGA thermographs of elemental S and poly(S/NDAM) copolymers with different initial percent compositions.
Figure 8. TGA thermographs of elemental S and poly(S/NDAM) copolymers with different initial percent compositions.
Jcs 09 00362 g008
Figure 9. DTG thermographs of elemental S and poly(S/NDAM) copolymers with different initial percent compositions.
Figure 9. DTG thermographs of elemental S and poly(S/NDAM) copolymers with different initial percent compositions.
Jcs 09 00362 g009
Figure 10. TGA thermographs of poly(S/NDAM) copolymers made of 50/50 composition at different reaction times.
Figure 10. TGA thermographs of poly(S/NDAM) copolymers made of 50/50 composition at different reaction times.
Jcs 09 00362 g010
Figure 11. DSC thermographs of elemental S and S/NDAM copolymers with different initial percent compositions.
Figure 11. DSC thermographs of elemental S and S/NDAM copolymers with different initial percent compositions.
Jcs 09 00362 g011
Figure 12. Variation in the adsorption capacity of NDAM/S copolymers with S/NDAM ratio content percent in the mixture. The pressure is 1 bar, and the temperature is 25 °C.
Figure 12. Variation in the adsorption capacity of NDAM/S copolymers with S/NDAM ratio content percent in the mixture. The pressure is 1 bar, and the temperature is 25 °C.
Jcs 09 00362 g012
Figure 13. Variation in the adsorption capacity of amine-containing sulfur copolymers with porogen content percent in the mixture. The S/NDAM ratio is 50/50, the pressure is 1 bar, and the temperature is 25 °C.
Figure 13. Variation in the adsorption capacity of amine-containing sulfur copolymers with porogen content percent in the mixture. The S/NDAM ratio is 50/50, the pressure is 1 bar, and the temperature is 25 °C.
Jcs 09 00362 g013
Figure 14. Process for the formation of carbamate due to CO2 adsorption on diamine-containing poly(S/NDAM) adsorbent in the absence of water.
Figure 14. Process for the formation of carbamate due to CO2 adsorption on diamine-containing poly(S/NDAM) adsorbent in the absence of water.
Jcs 09 00362 g014
Figure 15. Variation in CO2 adsorption capacity of amine-containing sulfur copolymer. The S/NDAM ratio is 50/50, and the weight percent of porogen is 50 wt%.
Figure 15. Variation in CO2 adsorption capacity of amine-containing sulfur copolymer. The S/NDAM ratio is 50/50, and the weight percent of porogen is 50 wt%.
Jcs 09 00362 g015
Table 1. Surface area, pore volume, and mean pore diameter of poly(S/NDAM) copolymers with various porogen contents.
Table 1. Surface area, pore volume, and mean pore diameter of poly(S/NDAM) copolymers with various porogen contents.
NaCl Content
(wt%)
Total Pore Volume
×103 (cm3/g)
Means Pore Diameter
(nm)
Surface Area (m2/g)
0.06.52.783.18
12.56.73.894.56
25.07.14.847.63
37.57.44.897.92
50.07.55.299.62
Table 2. Comparison of CO2 adsorption capacity of some chemically modified amine-containing adsorbents with mesoporous structures.
Table 2. Comparison of CO2 adsorption capacity of some chemically modified amine-containing adsorbents with mesoporous structures.
Adsorbent Materials Surface Area (m2/g)CO2 Capacity (mg/g)Mechanism of AdsorptionRefs
MCM 41 modified with TEPA and DEA on133.0132 (1 bar, 70 °C)Chemisorption/physisorption[83]
Mesoporous silica gel modified with APTS/TEPA75.0162 mg/g (1 bar, 70 °C)Chemisorption/physisorption[84]
Mesosilica MCM-48 modified with silane and EDA 419129 (1 bar, 30 °C)Chemisorption/physisorption[85]
Mesosilica gel modified with MDEA441.015.8 mg/g (1 bar, 70 °C)Chemisorption/physisorption[86]
Mesosilica (SBA-15) modified with APTMS17024.0 (at 1 bar, 30 °C)Chemisorption[87]
Poly(S/NDAM) copolymer
50/50 (S/NDAM)
9.6219.0
(at 1 bar, 30 °C)
ChemisorptionThis study
Poly(S/NDAM) copolymer
50/50 (S/NDAM)
9.62517.0
At 25 bar, 30 °C
ChemisorptionThis study
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Narendiran, D.; Sumadi, N.H.; Manzoor Ghumman, A.S.; Mohamad, N.A.; Nasef, M.M.; Abbasi, A.; Shamsuddin, R. A New Sulfur-Containing Copolymer Created Through the Thermally Induced Radical Copolymerization of Elemental Sulfur with N2,N2-Diallylmelamine Comonomer for Potential CO2 Capture. J. Compos. Sci. 2025, 9, 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9070362

AMA Style

Narendiran D, Sumadi NH, Manzoor Ghumman AS, Mohamad NA, Nasef MM, Abbasi A, Shamsuddin R. A New Sulfur-Containing Copolymer Created Through the Thermally Induced Radical Copolymerization of Elemental Sulfur with N2,N2-Diallylmelamine Comonomer for Potential CO2 Capture. Journal of Composites Science. 2025; 9(7):362. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9070362

Chicago/Turabian Style

Narendiran, Dharrinesh, Nurul Hazirah Sumadi, Ali Shaan Manzoor Ghumman, Noor Ashikin Mohamad, Mohamed Mahmoud Nasef, Amin Abbasi, and Rashid Shamsuddin. 2025. "A New Sulfur-Containing Copolymer Created Through the Thermally Induced Radical Copolymerization of Elemental Sulfur with N2,N2-Diallylmelamine Comonomer for Potential CO2 Capture" Journal of Composites Science 9, no. 7: 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9070362

APA Style

Narendiran, D., Sumadi, N. H., Manzoor Ghumman, A. S., Mohamad, N. A., Nasef, M. M., Abbasi, A., & Shamsuddin, R. (2025). A New Sulfur-Containing Copolymer Created Through the Thermally Induced Radical Copolymerization of Elemental Sulfur with N2,N2-Diallylmelamine Comonomer for Potential CO2 Capture. Journal of Composites Science, 9(7), 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9070362

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop