Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Fabrication of Co1−xNixCr2O4 Chromate Nanoparticles and the Effect of Ni Concentration on Their Bandgap, Structure, and Optical Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
Improving the Combustion Properties of Corncob Biomass via Torrefaction for Solid Fuel Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Conducting-Polymer Nanocomposites as Synergistic Supports That Accelerate Electro-Catalysis: PEDOT/Nano Co3O4/rGO as a Photo Catalyst of Oxygen Production from Water
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mechanical and Durability Characteristics Assessment of Geopolymer Composite (GPC) at Varying Silica Fume Content
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Laser Butt Welding of Thin Ti6Al4V Sheets: Effects of Welding Parameters

J. Compos. Sci. 2021, 5(9), 246; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs5090246
by Peter Omoniyi 1,2,*, Rasheedat Mahamood 1,3, Nana Arthur 4, Sisa Pityana 4, Samuel Skhosane 4, Yasuhiro Okamoto 5, Togo Shinonaga 5, Martin Maina 6, Tien-Chien Jen 1 and Esther Akinlabi 1,7
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Compos. Sci. 2021, 5(9), 246; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs5090246
Submission received: 5 August 2021 / Revised: 22 August 2021 / Accepted: 24 August 2021 / Published: 14 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multidisciplinary Composites)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

  1. How many times were each experimental condition performed in Table 2?
  2. Defocusing distance is a very important parameter in laser welding. Why was the experiment performed only when the defocusing distance was 5mm?
  3. Explain what L11 ~ L19 mean in Figure 4. Ex) L11 : 2.6kW, 2.6m/min
  4. In Figures 5 and 6, each point must be marked as L11~L19 for comparison. In Figure 5, for 2.8 kW, it looks like there is only one elongation. In Figure 6, at 2.6m/min, only 2 elongations are visible, and at 2.8m/min, only 2 tensile strengths are visible. If shapes are overlapped, it is recommended to draw only lines rather than filling the inside of the shape with color.
  5. Why did you explain only one case of 2.8kw and 3m/min in 3.4 Fracture Surface Analysis section? There are no analyzes for the remaining 8 cases.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

  1. I think, abbreviations “Nd” and “YAG” could be explained (page 1, line 43).
  2. Probably, trend lines should be added on Figure 5 for better visualization and interpretation of the results. Same is for Figure 6.
  3. Page 6, line 142. Did the sample fail itself? Or in the result of the application of some load?
  4. You investigated several regimes of welding. Which one is more preferrable and on which criteria this preference could be based? Please, if possible, give it, briefly, in the conclusion.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

  1. Add response of S/N 1 (Two sheets measuring 100 × 60 × 1 mm each were joined. Two tensile samples ~) in Section 2 Materials and Methods.
  2. Modify the welding speed, which is the X-axis range in Figure. 6 (2.5 m/min ~ 3.1 m/min)

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

In my view, paper can be accepted.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 3

Reviewer 1 Report

Accept in present form.

Back to TopTop