Geopolymer-Derived Aluminosilicate Matrix Composites Reinforced with Continuous Inconel 601 Fibers: Tensile Properties and Thermo-Oxidative Behavior
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials
3. Composite Fabrication
4. Methods for Properties Characterization
4.1. Bulk Density and Apparent Porosity
4.2. Mechanical Testing at Room Temperature (RT) and at Elevated Temperature
4.3. Thermo-Oxidative Testing
- (1)
- Evaluation of mechanical property changes before and after air aging using four-point flexural testing;
- (2)
- Assessment of mass change and microstructural evolution after air exposure.
4.4. Optical Microscopy and Scanning Electron Microscopy
5. Results
5.1. Bulk Density and Apparent Porosity, [0]6 Unidirectional Laminate
5.2. Mechanical Properties
5.2.1. Results of ASTM D6272-17e1 Testing (Four-Point Bending), [0]6 Unidirectional Laminate
5.2.2. Results of ASTM C1359-18e1 Testing (Tension), [0]8 Unidirectional Laminate
5.2.3. Results of ASTM C1359-18e1 Testing (Tension), [0/90]2S Balanced Laminate
5.3. Oxidation Kinetics and Microstructural Evaluation After Thermo-Oxidative Exposure
5.3.1. Matrix-Agnostic Scale-Correction Factor Derivation
5.3.2. Evaluation of Oxidation Kinetics
5.3.3. Activation Energy Evaluation
5.3.4. Microstructural Evaluation of Thermo-Oxidative Effects
6. Discussion
7. Conclusions
- Continuous-fiber laminates based on Inconel 601 reinforcement and a geopolymer-derived aluminosilicate matrix were produced by a slurry-impregnation/prepreg route followed by low-temperature consolidation and post-curing. The as-fabricated laminates exhibited a bulk density of 4.05 ± 0.08 g/cm3 and an apparent porosity of 24.88 ± 0.62%, indicating that the present processing condition produced rigid composite panels, but with open porosity.
- The laminates exhibited measurable tensile properties in both unidirectional and balanced architectures. The [0]8 laminates retained tensile strengths in the range of approximately 327.9–365.0 MPa from room temperature to 538 °C, while the balanced [0/90]2S laminates exhibited lower room-temperature tensile properties than the unidirectional material, consistent with the reduced fraction of load-bearing 0° fibers.
- The first-order ROM assessment showed close agreement between the predicted and measured longitudinal tensile modulus, indicating that the elastic response is primarily governed by the metallic fibers. The strength-based ROM comparison was subject to greater uncertainty because the exact tensile properties of the Inconel 601 fibers are not known. Nevertheless, the measured and predicted strengths remain of the same order of magnitude and support the conclusion that the fibers provide the dominant contribution to the composite tensile strength.
- The room-temperature tensile strength of the balanced [0/90]2S laminate (163.4 MPa and 174.2 MPa for the two tested series) was of similar magnitude to values reported in the literature for a 12-ply 0/90 woven Nextel 720/alumina oxide/oxide CMC reference (163–179 MPa). This comparison is not intended to imply equivalence between the two systems, which differ substantially in constituent materials, architecture, density, processing maturity, and temperature capability, but rather to indicate that the present material system can achieve a comparable initial load-bearing capability within the considered intermediate-temperature range.
- Thermo-oxidative testing showed no clear reduction, in room-temperature flexural properties after air exposure at 538 °C for 336 h, whereas higher-temperature exposure produced increasingly pronounced oxidation of the Inconel 601 fibers. The oxidation rate was temperature dependent: at 649 °C the mass-gain behavior followed parabolic law, consistent with the diffusion-controlled growth of a thin Al-rich interfacial film; at 760 °C the oxidation rate increased and, with the onset of deviation from ideal parabolic behavior, connected with diffusion of alloying elements and formation of a localized Cr-Mn-O-rich phase; and at 816 °C the highest initial mass gain was followed by a reduced late-stage rate, loss of the Al-rich surface film, and substantially more severe localized fiber attack extending into the fibers interior.
- Comparison with literature data for neat Inconel 601 fiber indicates that the composite exhibits higher effective oxidation rate constants and lower activation energy in the studied composite form, demonstrating that the geopolymer-derived aluminosilicate matrix negatively affects oxidation resistance relative to the bare fiber.
- Overall, the present results indicate that the Inconel 601/geopolymer-derived composite should be regarded as a potential material system for further maturation and development for intermediate-temperature applications. Further work should focus on optimizing processing, as this is expected to strongly influence the morphology, size distribution, connectivity and level of the open porosity. In turn, these porosity characteristics are likely to affect oxygen ingress, oxidation-related damage, fiber–matrix interfacial degradation, and mechanical property retention. Additional work is also needed to assess fatigue, creep, and environmental durability in order to define the practical application limits of the material. Future work should also address thermal property characterization, including thermal expansion behavior, thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity, and thermal cycling resistance, with particular attention to the role of fiber–matrix thermal expansion mismatch in residual stress development and long-term durability.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| BSAS/BAS | Barium strontium aluminosilicate/barium aluminosilicate |
| CAS | Calcium aluminosilicate |
| CMC | Ceramic-matrix composite |
| SiC/SiC | Silicon carbide/silicon carbide composite system |
| CVI | Chemical vapor infiltration |
| RMI | Reactive melt infiltration |
| MI | Melt infiltration |
| PIP | Polymer infiltration and pyrolysis |
| Su | Flexural strength |
| Eft | Flexural modulus in tension |
| Efc | Flexural modulus in compression |
| εft | Strain at failure in tension |
| εfc | Strain at failure in compression |
| Et | Tensile modulus |
| Ftu | tensile strength |
| εf | strain at failure |
| RT | Room temperature |
| [0]8 | Unidirectional laminate layup with eight 0° plies |
| [0/90]2S | Balanced cross-ply laminate layup with symmetric stacking sequence |
| CoV | Coefficient of Variation |
| ROM | Rule-of-mixtures |
| Vf | Fiber volume fraction |
| Vm | Matrix volume fraction |
| Vp | Void volume fraction |
| Ef | Fiber modulus |
| Em | Matrix modulus |
| Sf | Fiber tensile strength |
| Sm | Matrix tensile strength |
| ff | Fiber mass fraction in composite |
| mf | Fiber mass |
| m0 | Initial composite mass |
| ρf | Fiber density |
| ρ0 | Composite bulk density |
| X | Scale-corrected fractional mass gain |
| ∆M | Raw mass change |
| kp | Parabolic rate constant |
| t | Exposure time |
References
- Davidovits, J. Geopolymers: Inorganic polymeric new materials. J. Therm. Anal. 1991, 37, 1633–1656. [Google Scholar]
- Lyon, R.E.; Balaguru, P.N.; Foden, A.; Sorathia, U.; Davidovits, J.; Davidovics, M. Fire-resistant aluminosilicate composites. Fire Mater. 1997, 21, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lahoti, M.; Wong, K.H.; Yang, E.-H.; Tan, K.H. Effects of Si/Al molar ratio on strength endurance and volume stability of metakaolin geopolymers subject to elevated temperature. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 5726–5734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Duxson, P.; Fernández-Jiménez, A.; Provis, J.L.; Lukey, G.C.; Palomo, A.; van Deventer, J.S.J. Geopolymer technology: The current state of the art. J. Mater. Sci. 2007, 42, 2917–2933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- He, P.; Jia, D.; Lin, T.; Wang, M.; Zhou, Y. Effects of high-temperature heat treatment on the mechanical properties of unidirectional carbon fiber reinforced geopolymer composites. Ceram. Int. 2010, 36, 1447–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Papakonstantinou, C.G.; Balaguru, P.N.; Lyon, R.E. Comparative study of high temperature composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2001, 32, 637–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lin, T.; Jia, D.; Wang, M.; He, P.; Liang, D. Effects of fibre content on mechanical properties and fracture behaviour of short carbon fibre reinforced geopolymer matrix composites. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2009, 32, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Aziz, I.H.; Abdullah, M.M.A.B.; Yong, H.C.; Ming, L.Y.; Hussin, K.; Azimi, E.A. A review on mechanical properties of geopolymer composites for high temperature application. Key Eng. Mater. 2015, 660, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bansal, N.P. Effects of High-Temperature Annealing in Air on Hi-Nicalon Fiber-Reinforced Celsian Matrix Composites; NASA/TM—2008-215221; National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Glenn Research Center: Cleveland, OH, USA, 2008.
- Tredway, W.K.; Prewo, K.M. Carbon Fiber Reinforced Glass Matrix Composites for Structural Space Based Applications; Final Report R89-917704-1; United Technologies Research Center: East Hartford, CT, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Butkus, L.M.; Holmes, J.W.; Nicholas, T. Thermomechanical Fatigue Behavior of a Silicon Carbide Fiber-Reinforced Calcium Aluminosilicate Composite. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1993, 76, 2817–2825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bansal, N.P. CVD SiC fiber-reinforced barium aluminosilicate glass–ceramic matrix composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 1996, 220, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, G.; Li, Y.; Zheng, S.; Wang, J.; Sglavo, V.M.; Xie, S. High performance SiC fiber-reinforced celsian matrix composites with BN/C/SiNx/C interface. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2024, 44, 4482–4492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Saroj, V.K.; Devgan, N.R.; Rajotia, M.; Panda, S. Recent Advancements in Glass Matrix Composites: A Comprehensive Review of Fabrication, Properties, and Applications. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2026, 109, e71011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- GE Aerospace. Ceramic Matrix Composite Technology. Available online: https://www.geaerospace.com/ (accessed on 28 May 2026).
- Yuan, J.; Yu, Y.; Ren, Q.; Yang, F.; Nie, H.; Huang, Z.; Li, Y. SiCf/SiC composites for nuclear safety applications: A review. Ceram. Int. 2026, 52, 16627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, R.; Wang, F.; Zhang, J.; Wan, F.; Wang, Y. Effects of CVI SiC amount and deposition rates on properties of SiCf/SiC composites fabricated by hybrid chemical vapor infiltration (CVI) and precursor infiltration and pyrolysis (PIP) routes. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 26971–26977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Lamon, J. Chemical vapor infiltrated SiC/SiC composites (CVI SiC/SiC). In Handbook of Ceramic Composites; Bansal, N.P., Ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2005; pp. 55–76. [Google Scholar]
- Süß, F.; Schneider, T.; Friess, M.; Koch, D. Combination of PIP and LSI processes for SiC/SiC ceramic matrix composites. Open Ceram. 2021, 5, 100056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Katnic, S.P.; Latheef, M.A.A.; Sharp, K.; Martinez, M.; Singh, M. Addressing processing limitations in SiC-based ceramic composites: A review of hybrid approaches and perspectives. Ceram. Int. 2025, 51, 63501–63518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Silverstein, R.; Zok, F.; Levi, C. Vapor-mediated melt infiltration for synthesizing SiC composite matrices. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 104, 3833–3844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bhatt, R.; Lang, J.; Smith, C. Processing and properties of 3D woven SiC/SiC composites with hybrid matrix. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2024, 44, 116739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Ramachandran, K.; Bear, J.C.; Jayaseelan, D.D. Oxide-based ceramic matrix composites for high-temperature environments: A review. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2025, 27, 2402000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Simon, R.A. Progress in processing and performance of porous-matrix oxide/oxide composites. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2005, 2, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Karadimas, G.; Salonitis, K. Ceramic matrix composites for aero engine applications—A review. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 3017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Scholz, H.; Vetter, J.; Herborn, R.; Ruedinger, A. Oxide ceramic fibers via dry spinning process—From lab to fab. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2020, 17, 1636–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Special Metals Corporation. INCONEL Alloy 601; Special Metals Corporation: New Hartford, NY, USA, 2005; Available online: https://www.specialmetals.com/documents/technical-bulletins/inconel/inconel-alloy-601.pdf (accessed on 28 May 2026).
- Austral Wright Metals. Inconel Alloy 601 N06601. Available online: https://www.australwright.com.au/technical-data/alloys/high-performance-alloys/n06601-inconel-alloy-601/ (accessed on 28 May 2026).
- ASTM C20-00; Standard Test Methods for Apparent Porosity, Water Absorption, Apparent Specific Gravity, and Bulk Density of Burned Refractory Brick and Shapes by Boiling Water. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2000.
- Standard’s ISO/IEC 17025:2017; General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
- ASTM D6276-17e1; Standard Test Method for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials by Four-Point Bending. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2017.
- ASTM C1359-18e1; Standard Test Method for Monotonic Tensile Strength Testing of Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Advanced Ceramics with Solid Rectangular Cross Section Test Specimens at Elevated Temperatures. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2018.
- Samal, S.; Blanco, I. An Application Review of Fiber-Reinforced Geopolymer Composite. Fibers 2021, 9, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hall, E. The deformation and ageing of mild steel: III discussion of results. Proc. Phys. Soc. B 1951, 64, 747–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Petch, N.J. The orientation relationships between cementite and α-iron. Acta Crystallogr. 1953, 6, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Carpinteri, A.; Puzzi, S. Size effect upon grained materials tensile strength. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 2006, 45, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- De Bondt, S.; Decrop, J. Bundle Drawn Stainless Steel Fibers. International Patent Application WO 2003/010353 A1, 6 February 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Salmon, C.; Tiberghien, D.; Molins, R.; Colin, C.; Delannay, F. Oxidation behaviour in air of thin alloy 601 fibres. Mater. High Temp. 2000, 17, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birks, N.; Meier, G.H.; Pettit, F.S. Introduction to the High-Temperature Oxidation of Metals, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Pritzkow, W.; Nöth, A.; Rüdinger, A. Oxide Ceramic Matrix Composites—Manufacturing, Machining, Properties and Industrial Applications. Ceram. Appl. 2015, 3, 48–53. [Google Scholar]
- Di Salvo, D.T.; Sackett, E.E.; Johnston, R.E.; Evans, W.J. Mechanical characterization of a fibre reinforced oxide/oxide ceramic matrix composite. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 35, 4513–4520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Eber, C.A. Effect of Temperature and Steam Environment on Fatigue Behaviour of an Oxide-Oxide Continuous Fiber Ceramic Composite. Master’s Thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, OH, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]














| Test | Standard/Method | Number of Samples | Conditioning Temperature Range | Test Temperature | Laminate Lay-Up | Specimen Type and Size | Properties Characterized |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Four-point flexure, initial screening | ASTM D6272-17e1 | 5 for each conditioning temperature | As-fabricated; air-aged at 427 °C for 336 h; air-aged at 538 °C for 336 h | Room temperature (RT) | [0]6 | Rectangular bars; width 6.0 mm; typical thickness about ~2 mm; 80.0 mm support span and 26.7 mm load span; strain gauge s bonded to both sides | Flexural strength (Su), flexural modulus in tension Eft, flexural modulus in compression Efc, strain at failure in tension (εft), strain at failure in compression (εfc) |
| Tension, unidirectional laminate | ASTM C1359-18e1 | 3 | As-fabricated | RT, 371 °C, 427 °C, and 538 °C | [0]8 | Contoured, face-loaded test specimen acc. to ASTM C1359-18e1 FIG. X2.3; typical thickness about ~2.8 mm | Tensile modulus (Et), tensile strength (Ftu), strain at failure (εf) |
| Tension, balanced laminate | ASTM C1359-18e1 | 3 | As-fabricated | RT | [0/90]2S | Contoured, face-loaded test specimen acc. to ASTM C1359-18e1 FIG. X2.3; typical thickness about ~2.8 mm | Tensile modulus (Et), tensile strength (Ftu), strain at failure (εf) |
| Statistic | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| n (samples) | 4 | - |
| Mean | 4.05 | g/cm3 |
| Std Dev | 0.08 | g/cm3 |
| Coefficient of Variation (CoV) (%) | 1.97 | % |
| Statistic | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| n (samples) | 4 | - |
| Mean | 24.88 | % |
| Std Dev | 0.62 | % |
| CoV (%) | 2.5 | % |
| Statistic | Conditioning | Flexural Strength Su [MPa] | Modulus (Compression) Efc [GPa] | Modulus (Tension) Eft [GPa] | Strain at Failure (Compression) εfc [μe] | Strain at Failure (Tension) εft [μe] | Strain at Failure (Average) εf [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | As-fabricated | 503.0 | 80.4 | 78.3 | 6231 | 6561 | 0.64 |
| Std Dev | 63.4 | 4.6 | 4.9 | 425 | 616 | 0.05 | |
| CoV (%) | 12.6 | 5.7 | 6.3 | 7 | 9 | 7.80 | |
| Mean | 427 °C for 336 h in air | 528.6 | 78.8 | 77.4 | 6484 | 7268 | 0.69 |
| Std Dev | 92.0 | 3.5 | 2.6 | 1326 | 1122 | 0.11 | |
| CoV (%) | 17.4 | 4.5 | 3.3 | 20 | 15 | 15.70 | |
| Mean | 538 °C for 336 h in air | 512.4 | 80.7 | 81.4 | 6454 | 6295 | 0.63 |
| Std Dev | 44.0 | 6.3 | 7.0 | 341 | 622 | 0.05 | |
| CoV (%) | 8.6 | 7.8 | 8.6 | 5 | 10 | 7.00 |
| Statistic | Test Temperature [°C] | Tensile Strength (Ftu) [MPa] | Tensile Modulus (Et) [GPa] | Strain at Failure (εf) [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | RT | 365.0 | 90.3 | — |
| Std Dev | 20.7 | 2.8 | — | |
| CoV [%] | 5.7 | 3.1 | — | |
| Mean | 371 | 327.9 | 78.6 | — |
| Std Dev | 23.1 | 1.1 | — | |
| CoV [%] | 7.0 | 1.4 | — | |
| Mean | 427 | 341.0 | 75.8 | 0.48 |
| Std Dev | 15.9 | 1.9 | 0.04 | |
| CoV [%] | 4.7 | 2.5 | 8.33 | |
| Mean | 538 | 346.7 | 70.3 | 0.58 |
| Std Dev | 11.0 | 0.7 | 0.01 | |
| CoV [%] | 3.2 | 1.0 | 1.72 |
| Parameter | Symbol | Value | Units | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiber volume fraction | Vf | 0.40 | - | Assumed |
| Apparent porosity | Vp | 0.2488 | - | Measured, this work |
| Matrix volume fraction | Vm | 0.3512 | - | Calculated as 1 − Vf − Vp |
| Laminate tensile modulus, RT | Et | 90.3 | GPa | Measured, this work |
| Laminate tensile modulus, 538 °C | Et | 70.3 | GPa | Measured, this work |
| Laminate tensile strength, RT | Ftu | 365.0 | MPa | Measured, this work |
| Laminate tensile strength, 538 °C | Ftu | 346.7 | MPa | Measured, this work |
| Inconel 601 modulus, RT | Ef | 206.5 | GPa | Datasheet value [27] |
| Inconel 601 modulus, 538 °C | Ef | 175.0 | GPa | Interpolated datasheet value [27] |
| Inconel 601 tensile strength, RT | Sf | 1425 | MPa | Datasheet value [27] |
| Inconel 601 tensile strength, 538 °C | Sf | 1164 | MPa | Datasheet proxy value [27] |
| Geopolymer matrix modulus | Em | 18.5 | GPa | Literature proxy [33] |
| Geopolymer matrix strength | Sm | 27.7 | MPa | Literature proxy [33] |
| Condition | Et, ROM (GPa) | Et, measured (GPa) | Ftu, ROM (MPa) | Ftu, measured (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RT | 87.2 | 90.3 | 565.8 | 365.0 |
| 538 °C | 74.9 | 70.3 | 464.0 | 346.7 |
| Statistic | Panel #ID | Test Temperature [°C] | Tensile Strength (Ftu) [MPa] | Tensile Modulus (Et) [GPa] | Strain at Failure (εf) [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 1 | RT | 163.4 | 46.9 | 0.36 |
| Std Dev | 9.9 | 1.6 | 0.02 | ||
| CoV [%] | 6.1 | 3.4 | 4.26 | ||
| Mean | 2 | RT | 174.2 | 44.2 | 0.46 |
| Std Dev | 15.3 | 1.7 | 0.03 | ||
| CoV [%] | 8.8 | 3.9 | 6.83 |
| Property/Parameter | Ox/Ox CMC (Nextel 720 Fiber Based) | Present Work |
|---|---|---|
| Fiber Volume Fraction (Vf) | 35–45% [40] | 39% (Nominal) |
| Porosity | 25–35% [41,40] | 25% |
| Density | 2.5–2.9 g/cm3 [40] | 4.05 g/cm3 |
| Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS) | 163–179 MPa [41] | 163–174 MPa |
| Specific Tensile Strength | 58–64 kN·m/kg [41] | 40–43 kN·m/kg |
| Target Temperature Range | >1000 °C [41,40,42] | Potentially up to 538 °C or higher for limited time excursions (intermediate space) |
| Durability & Environment | High long-term oxidation/steam resistance [41,40,42] | Long-term evaluation pending |
| Temperature | Inconel 601-Reinforced Geopolymer-Derived Composite Parabolic Law Constant kp [s−1] | Inconel 601 Neat Fiber [38] Parabolic Law Constant kp [s−1] |
|---|---|---|
| 649 °C | 3.06 × 10−10 | - |
| 700 °C | - | 1.41 × 10−10 |
| 750 °C | - | 1.36 × 10−9 |
| 760 °C | 3.87 × 10−9 | - |
| 800 °C | - | 1.10 × 10−8 |
| 816 °C | 9.96 × 10−9 | - |
| 850 °C | - | 7.70 × 10−8 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Jasiczek, M.; Bobrowska, M.; Jedral, A. Geopolymer-Derived Aluminosilicate Matrix Composites Reinforced with Continuous Inconel 601 Fibers: Tensile Properties and Thermo-Oxidative Behavior. J. Compos. Sci. 2026, 10, 501. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10090501
Jasiczek M, Bobrowska M, Jedral A. Geopolymer-Derived Aluminosilicate Matrix Composites Reinforced with Continuous Inconel 601 Fibers: Tensile Properties and Thermo-Oxidative Behavior. Journal of Composites Science. 2026; 10(9):501. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10090501
Chicago/Turabian StyleJasiczek, Michal, Marcelina Bobrowska, and Arnold Jedral. 2026. "Geopolymer-Derived Aluminosilicate Matrix Composites Reinforced with Continuous Inconel 601 Fibers: Tensile Properties and Thermo-Oxidative Behavior" Journal of Composites Science 10, no. 9: 501. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10090501
APA StyleJasiczek, M., Bobrowska, M., & Jedral, A. (2026). Geopolymer-Derived Aluminosilicate Matrix Composites Reinforced with Continuous Inconel 601 Fibers: Tensile Properties and Thermo-Oxidative Behavior. Journal of Composites Science, 10(9), 501. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10090501
