Next Article in Journal
Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Wildland-Urban Interface Fuelbreak Planning Integrating ALS and UAV-Borne LiDAR Data and Multispectral Images
Next Article in Special Issue
Automating Drone Image Processing to Map Coral Reef Substrates Using Google Earth Engine
Previous Article in Journal
Estimating Tree Height and Volume Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Photography and SfM Technology, with Verification of Result Accuracy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Accuracy of 3D Landscape Reconstruction without Ground Control Points Using Different UAS Platforms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluating the Efficacy and Optimal Deployment of Thermal Infrared and True-Colour Imaging When Using Drones for Monitoring Kangaroos

by
Elizabeth A. Brunton
1,*,
Javier X. Leon
1,2 and
Scott E. Burnett
1,2
1
School of Science and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD 4556, Australia
2
Global-Change Ecology Research Group, School of Science and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD 4556, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Drones 2020, 4(2), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/drones4020020
Submission received: 29 April 2020 / Revised: 22 May 2020 / Accepted: 25 May 2020 / Published: 27 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue She Maps)

Abstract

Advances in drone technology have given rise to much interest in the use of drone-mounted thermal imagery in wildlife monitoring. This research tested the feasibility of monitoring large mammals in an urban environment and investigated the influence of drone flight parameters and environmental conditions on their successful detection using thermal infrared (TIR) and true-colour (RGB) imagery. We conducted 18 drone flights at different altitudes on the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia. Eastern grey kangaroos (Macropus giganteus) were detected from TIR (n=39) and RGB orthomosaics (n=33) using manual image interpretation. Factors that predicted the detection of kangaroos from drone images were identified using unbiased recursive partitioning. Drone-mounted imagery achieved an overall 73.2% detection success rate using TIR imagery and 67.2% using RGB imagery when compared to on-ground counts of kangaroos. We showed that the successful detection of kangaroos using TIR images was influenced by vegetation type, whereas detection using RGB images was influenced by vegetation type, time of day that the drone was deployed, and weather conditions. Kangaroo detection was highest in grasslands, and kangaroos were not successfully detected in shrublands. Drone-mounted TIR and RGB imagery are effective at detecting large mammals in urban and peri-urban environments.
Keywords: eastern grey kangaroo; thermal imaging; unmanned aircraft system; UAV; UAS; SfM; aerial wildlife monitoring eastern grey kangaroo; thermal imaging; unmanned aircraft system; UAV; UAS; SfM; aerial wildlife monitoring
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Brunton, E.A.; Leon, J.X.; Burnett, S.E. Evaluating the Efficacy and Optimal Deployment of Thermal Infrared and True-Colour Imaging When Using Drones for Monitoring Kangaroos. Drones 2020, 4, 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones4020020

AMA Style

Brunton EA, Leon JX, Burnett SE. Evaluating the Efficacy and Optimal Deployment of Thermal Infrared and True-Colour Imaging When Using Drones for Monitoring Kangaroos. Drones. 2020; 4(2):20. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones4020020

Chicago/Turabian Style

Brunton, Elizabeth A., Javier X. Leon, and Scott E. Burnett. 2020. "Evaluating the Efficacy and Optimal Deployment of Thermal Infrared and True-Colour Imaging When Using Drones for Monitoring Kangaroos" Drones 4, no. 2: 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones4020020

APA Style

Brunton, E. A., Leon, J. X., & Burnett, S. E. (2020). Evaluating the Efficacy and Optimal Deployment of Thermal Infrared and True-Colour Imaging When Using Drones for Monitoring Kangaroos. Drones, 4(2), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones4020020

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop