Skip to Content
ProceedingsProceedings
  • Abstract
  • Open Access

21 February 2023

Early Lactation Outcomes after Pregnancies Complicated by Gestational Diabetes †

,
,
,
,
and
1
School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
2
Mathematics and Statistics, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
3
Western Obstetrics, Balcatta, WA 6021, Australia
4
Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia

Abstract

Continued breastfeeding attenuates maternal and infant risks associated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), which may be more difficult after a GDM pregnancy, with reports of delayed secretory activation and reduced milk production. The total 24 h milk production cycle is not routinely measured; therefore, it is unclear whether reported low milk production is actual or perceived. We aimed to describe early lactation outcomes and 24 h milk production in women with GDM. Women with GDM-complicated pregnancies recorded early feeding practices. The 24 h cycle of milk production was measured at 3 weeks by weighing infants pre- and post-breastfeeds, as well as breast expression volumes. Electronic scales sensitive to 2 g were used. Low 24 h milk production was classified as <600 mL. For women with GDM (n = 40), the median time to the initiation of breastfeeding was 55 min, and delayed secretory activation (n = 24, 60%) was common. Most women achieved frequent milk removal (≥8 × 24 h) in the first 24 h after birth (n = 27, 68%) was at one week (n = 38, 95%) and three weeks postpartum (n = 36, 90%). However, median 24 h milk production was 639 mL (range 100–1220 mL), with low milk production measured in n = 16 (40%, range 100–592 mL). Conclusions: Delayed secretory activation and low milk production are more common in women with GDM despite regular milk removal from the breast, suggesting that altered endocrine pathways inherent to GDM may be implicated.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.L.P., M.E.W. and D.T.G.; methodology, S.L.P., J.L.M., A.R. and D.T.G.; analysis, S.L.P. and A.R.; investigation, S.L.P. and S.A.P.; resources, D.T.G.; data curation, S.L.P. and J.L.M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.L.P.; writing—review and editing, D.T.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by an unrestricted research grant paid by Medela AG to The University of Western Australia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the University of Western Australia’s Human Research Ethics Committee (RA/4/20/5657), in accordance with its ethics review and approval procedures.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

D.T.G. declares her participation in the Scientific Advisory Board of Medela AG. S.L.P., J.L.M. and D.T.G. receive salaries from an unrestricted research grant paid by Medela AG, administered through The University of Western Australia. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.