Association between Intake of Fermented Dairy Products and Diet Quality, Health Beliefs in a Representative Sample of Polish Population †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sample Collection
2.2. Questionnaires
2.3. Confounding Factors
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wade, A.T.; Davis, C.R.; Dyer, K.A.; Hodgson, J.M.; Woodman, R.J.; Murphy, K.J. A Mediterranean diet supplemented with dairy foods improves markers of cardiovascular risk: Results from the MedDairy randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018, 108, 1166–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- García-Burgos, M.; Moreno-Fernández, J.; Alférez, M.J.M.; Díaz-Castro, J.; López-Aliaga, I. New perspectives in fermented dairy products and their health relevance. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 72, 104059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sajdakowska, M.; Gębski, J.; Gutkowska, K.; Żakowska-Biemans, S. Importance of Health Aspects in Polish Consumer Choices of Dairy Products. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jeżewska-Zychowicz, M.; Gawęcki, J.; Wądołowska, L.; Czarnocińska, J.; Galiński, G.; Kołłajtis-Dołowy, A.; Roszkowski, W.; Wawrzyniak, A.; Przybyłowicz, K.; Krusińska, B.; et al. Kwestionariusz do badania poglądów i zwyczajów żywieniowych dla osób w wieku od 16 do 65 lat, wersja 1.1—kwestionariusz administrowany przez ankietera-badacza. In Kwestionariusz do Badania Poglądów i Zwyczajów Żywieniowych Oraz Procedura Opracowania Danych; Gawęcki, J., Ed.; Human Nutrition Science Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Warsaw, Poland, 2014; pp. 3–20. [Google Scholar]
- Hebestreit, K.; Yahiaoui-Doktor, M.; Engel, C.; Vetter, W.; Siniatchkin, M.; Erickson, N.; Halle, M.; Kiechle, M.; Bischoff, S.C. Validation of the German version of the Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS) questionnaire. BMC Cancer 2017, 17, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kähkönen, P.; Tuorila, H. Consumer responses to reduced and regular fat content in different products: Effects of gender, involvement and health concern. Food Qual. Prefer. 1999, 10, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Moreno de Leblanc, A.; Perdigón, G. The application of probiotic fermented milks in cancer and intestinal inflammation. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2010, 69, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pan, D.D.; Zeng, X.Q.; Yan, Y.T. Characterisation of Lactobacillus fermentum SM-7 isolated from koumiss, a potential probiotic bacterium with cholesterol-lowering effects. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2011, 91, 512–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sharifi, M.; Moridnia, A.; Mortazavi, D.; Salehi, M.; Bagheri, M.; Sheikhi, A. Kefir: A powerful probiotics with anticancer properties. Med. Oncol. (Northwood Lond. Engl.) 2017, 34, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Górska-Warsewicz, H.; Rejman, K.; Laskowski, W.; Czeczotko, M. Milk and Dairy Products and Their Nutritional Contribution to the Average Polish Diet. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Total Fermented Dairy Product Consumption | p | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | ||
Fermented dairy product consumption, times/d † | 0.2 (0.1; 0.2) | 0.4 (0.3; 0.7) | 0.8 (0.7; 0.9) | 1.2 (1.2; 1.3) | 2.1 (1.7; 2.6) | <0.001 |
Age cohort 19–30 y, years † | 26 (23; 28) | 26 (23; 29) | 27 (24; 29) a | 26 (22; 28) | 25 (21; 28) a | 0.022 |
Age cohort 66–75 y, years † | 69 (67; 71) | 69 (67; 71) | 68 (67; 70) | 69 (67; 71) | 69 (67; 71) | 0.310 |
Gender (women) | 48.1 (148) | 51.3 (180) | 58.7 (186) | 53.2 (166) | 59.0 (240) | 0.015 |
Waist circumference, cm † | 86 (75; 100) | 83 (70; 95) | 80 (70; 90) a | 85 (75; 96) | 87 (76; 98) a | 0.016 |
Body mass index, kg/m2 † | 25.5 (22.7; 28.7) | 25.2 (22.0; 27.9) | 24.8 (22.2; 27.2) | 25.5 (23.0; 28.1) | 25.1 (22.3; 28.0) | 0.132 |
% Overweight obese | 53.7 (123) | 51.5 (138) | 48.4 (119) | 53.3 (119) | 50.9 (172) | 0.773 |
Smoking status (current) | 20.1 (62) | 24.8 (87) | 24.3 (77) | 23.7 (74) | 27.3 (111) | 0.290 |
Physical activity (MVPA) | 61.0 (188) | 65.8 (231) | 68.8 (218) | 65.4 (204) | 61.2 (249) | 0.170 |
TV watching time (more than 6 h) | 12.3 (38) | 17.4 (61) | 16.4 (52) | 18.9 (59) | 24.3 (99) | 0.001 |
Sleeping time (6–9 h) | 79.2 (244) | 83.2 (292) | 77.9 (247) | 76.0 (237) | 74.0 (301) | 0.034 |
Economic status (high and very high) | 25.0 (77) | 28.8 (101) | 25.9 (82) | 24.4 (76) | 28.0 (114) | 0.643 |
Education level (higher) | 13.6 (42) | 15.1 (53) | 18.3 (58) | 11.9 (37) | 13.0 (53) | 0.167 |
Total Fermented Dairy Product Consumption | Ptrend | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | ||
MEDAS score | 5.6 (5.3; 5.9) | 5.8 (5.4; 6.1) | 5.7 (5.4; 6.1) | 6.0 (5.6; 6.3) | 6.2 (5.9; 6.6) | <0.001 |
Plant oils as main (yes) † | 73.1 (225) | 83.5 (293) | 86.4 (274) | 87.2(272) | 83.1 (338) | 0.096 |
Plant oils, times/d | 1.7 (1.4; 2.0) | 1.7 (1.5; 2.0) | 2.1 (1.8; 2.4) | 2.0 (1.7; 2.3) | 2.3 (2; 2.6) | <0.001 |
Vegetables, times/d | 2.7 (2.3; 3.0) | 2.6 (2.3; 3.0) | 2.5 (2.2; 2.8) | 2.6 (2.3; 3.0) | 3.1 (2.8; 3.5) | <0.001 |
Fruits and juices, times/d | 4.7 (4.2; 5.3) | 5.2 (4.6; 5.8) | 5.7 (5.1; 6.3) | 5.5 (4.9; 6.1) | 5.1 (4.6; 5.7) | 0.451 |
Red meat, times/d | 4.8 (4.3; 5.5) | 5.1 (4.5; 5.9) | 5.2 (4.6; 5.9) | 6.0 (5.3; 6.8) | 5.6 (5.0; 6.3) | 0.168 |
Butter and cream, times/d | 2.6 (2.2; 2.9) | 2.5 (2.2; 2.9) | 3.1 (2.7; 3.5) | 2.6 (2.3; 3.0) | 2.9 (2.6; 3.3) | 0.084 |
Sweetened beverages, times/d | 4.0 (3.3; 4.8) | 5.0 (4.1; 6.0) | 4.9 (4.1; 5.8) | 4.6 (3.8; 5.6) | 4.5 (3.8; 5.4) | 0.687 |
Wine, times/wk | 1.4 (1.1; 1.8) | 1.6 (1.2; 2.1) | 1.4 (1.1; 1.9) | 1.9 (1.4; 2.4) | 2.5 (2.1; 3.1) | <0.001 |
Legumes, times/wk | 1.2 (1.0; 1.5) | 1.4 (1.2; 1.7) | 1.7 (1.5; 2.1) | 1.7 (1.4; 2.0) | 2.0 (1.7; 2.4) | <0.001 |
Fish and seafood, times/wk | 1.3 (1.1; 1.6) | 1.6 (1.4; 1.9) | 1.7 (1.4; 2.0) | 1.9 (1.6; 2.2) | 2.1 (1.9; 2.4) | <0.001 |
Sweets and pastries, times/wk | 3.7 (3.2; 4.2) | 4.0 (3.5; 4.6) | 4.5 (4.0; 5.1) | 4.4 (3.8; 5.0) | 4.9 (4.4; 5.5) | <0.001 |
Nuts, times/wk | 0.6 (0.4; 0.9) | 0.8 (0.5; 1) | 1.1 (0.8; 1.4) | 1.1 (0.8; 1.5) | 1.6 (1.3; 2.1) | <0.001 |
Preferable white meat (yes) † | 71.4 (220) | 75.2 (264) | 73.2 (232) | 79.8 (249) | 80.6 (328) | 0.014 |
Whole grain products, times/d | 2.5 (2.1; 2.9) | 2.5 (2.1; 2.9) | 2.6 (2.3; 3.1) | 2.7 (2.4; 3.2) | 2.6 (2.3; 3.0) | 0.179 |
Total Fermented Dairy Product Consumption | Ptrend | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | ||
% (n) | 18.2 (308) | 20.7 (351) | 18.7 (317) | 18.4 (312) | 24.0 (407) | |
HCS score † | 37.1 (35.3; 39.0) | 36.6 (34.8; 38.5) | 36.2 (34.4; 38.0) | 37.3 (35.5; 39.2) | 39.5 (37.7; 41.4) | 0.002 |
Normal body weight | 26.3 (81) | 29.3 (103) | 38.2 (121) | 38.8 (121) | 39.6 (161) | 0.001 |
Healthy heart | 26.6 (82) | 32.5 (114) | 39.4 (125) | 46.2 (144) | 52.3 (213) | <0.001 |
Healthy bones | 56.5 (174) | 64.7 (227) | 71.9 (228) | 71.2 (222) | 67.6 (275) | 0.075 |
Improved immunity | 50.3 (155) | 61.3 (215) | 67.2 (213) | 68.6 (214) | 67.3 (274) | 0.002 |
Healthy digestive track | 59.1 (182) | 63.8 (224) | 68.5 (217) | 70.8 (221) | 61.2 (249) | 0.449 |
Healthy teeth | 27.3 (84) | 29.3 (103) | 37.5 (119) | 36.5 (114) | 36.9 (150) | <0.001 |
Not bring benefits | 51.6 (195) | 37.3 (131) | 26.2 (83) | 29.2 (91) | 20.6 (84) | <0.001 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Przybyłowicz, K.E.; Morze, J.; Danielewicz, A.; Staniewska, K.; Dąbrowska, A.; Baranowska, M.; Darewicz, M.; Żulewska, J.; Staniewski, B. Association between Intake of Fermented Dairy Products and Diet Quality, Health Beliefs in a Representative Sample of Polish Population. Proceedings 2020, 61, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECN2020-06988
Przybyłowicz KE, Morze J, Danielewicz A, Staniewska K, Dąbrowska A, Baranowska M, Darewicz M, Żulewska J, Staniewski B. Association between Intake of Fermented Dairy Products and Diet Quality, Health Beliefs in a Representative Sample of Polish Population. Proceedings. 2020; 61(1):26. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECN2020-06988
Chicago/Turabian StylePrzybyłowicz, Katarzyna E., Jakub Morze, Anna Danielewicz, Katarzyna Staniewska, Aneta Dąbrowska, Maria Baranowska, Małgorzata Darewicz, Justyna Żulewska, and Bogusław Staniewski. 2020. "Association between Intake of Fermented Dairy Products and Diet Quality, Health Beliefs in a Representative Sample of Polish Population" Proceedings 61, no. 1: 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECN2020-06988
APA StylePrzybyłowicz, K. E., Morze, J., Danielewicz, A., Staniewska, K., Dąbrowska, A., Baranowska, M., Darewicz, M., Żulewska, J., & Staniewski, B. (2020). Association between Intake of Fermented Dairy Products and Diet Quality, Health Beliefs in a Representative Sample of Polish Population. Proceedings, 61(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECN2020-06988