Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Cytotoxic Effects of Carnosic Acid Alone and Combination with Cisplatin in HepG2 Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Remobilisation and Fate of Sulphur in Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea. L)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Investigation of Insect Resistance Components in Wild Pigeonpea Cajanus Scarabaeoides †

Centre for Agriculture and the Bioeconomy, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane 4001, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the third International Tropical Agriculture Conference (TROPAG 2019), Brisbane, Australia, 11–13 November 2019.
Proceedings 2019, 36(1), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019036027
Published: 31 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The Third International Tropical Agriculture Conference (TROPAG 2019))

Abstract

:
Cajanus scarabaeoides (L.) Thouars is the closest wild relative of cultivated pigeonpea, Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh. However, unlike cultivated pigeonpea which is very susceptible to insects, especially Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner), this wild pigeonpea is strongly insect resistant. Since H. armigera causes damage to many important crops resulting in economic losses up to 2 billion USD/year, improvement in resistance to this insect in crops is highly desirable. Here we investigate insect resistance components in C. scarabaeoides and explore the possibility of transferring one or more of those factors to cultivated pigeonpea. A detached leaf assay was used to assess antibiosis and antixenosis resistance mechanisms in C. scarabaeoides. Artificial diet supplemented with lyophilised leaf powder was employed to investigate the antibiosis resistance mechanism. Data on larval mortality and larval and pupal weights were collected. Time taken for neonate larvae to pupate and for pupae to develop to the moth stage were determined through daily observations. Preliminary results showed that H. armigera larval weight was significantly reduced and larval development stages were prolonged when reared on different accessions of C. scarabaeoides as compared to the susceptible check, C. cajan (ICPL 87). Interspecific hybridization was carried out between C. scarabaeoides and a commercial pigeonpea variety. Results from insect challenge assays and trichome identification indicate that the hybrids have similar levels of insect resistance to their wild parent. Proteomic analysis is being used to identify possible antibiosis factors.

Funding

This project was funded by AssociatedGrain (scholarship) and Advance Queensland Research Fellowship AQRF14816-17RD2.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank QUT-CARF for the technical support and Australian Grains Gene bank (Horsham, Victoria, Australia) for providing the seeds used in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hoang, T.M.L.; Dawit, A.; Williams, B.; Higgins, T.; Mundree, S. Investigation of Insect Resistance Components in Wild Pigeonpea Cajanus Scarabaeoides. Proceedings 2019, 36, 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019036027

AMA Style

Hoang TML, Dawit A, Williams B, Higgins T, Mundree S. Investigation of Insect Resistance Components in Wild Pigeonpea Cajanus Scarabaeoides. Proceedings. 2019; 36(1):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019036027

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hoang, Thi My Linh, Abigail Dawit, Brett Williams, TJ Higgins, and Sagadevan Mundree. 2019. "Investigation of Insect Resistance Components in Wild Pigeonpea Cajanus Scarabaeoides" Proceedings 36, no. 1: 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019036027

APA Style

Hoang, T. M. L., Dawit, A., Williams, B., Higgins, T., & Mundree, S. (2019). Investigation of Insect Resistance Components in Wild Pigeonpea Cajanus Scarabaeoides. Proceedings, 36(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2019036027

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop