Next Article in Journal
Borosilicate Glass MEMS Lorentz Force Magnetometer
Previous Article in Journal
3D-Printed MEMS Magnetometer Featuring Compliant Mechanism
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

UV Light Assisted NO2Sensing by SnO2/Graphene Oxide Composite †

by
Hashitha M. M. Munasinghe Arachchige
1,2,*,
Nanda Gunawardhana
3,
Dario Zappa
1 and
Elisabetta Comini
1
1
SENSOR Lab, Department of Information Engineering (DII), Università degli Studi di Brescia, Via Branze, 38, 25123 Brescia, Italy
2
Postgraduate Institute of Science, University of Peradeniya, 20400 Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
3
International Research Centre, University of Peradeniya, 20400 Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the Eurosensors 2018 Conference, Graz, Austria, 9–12 September 2018.
Proceedings 2018, 2(13), 787; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2130787
Published: 23 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of EUROSENSORS 2018)

Abstract

:
Nitric oxide (NO2) is one of the air pollutants that pose serious environmental concerns over the years. In this study, SnO2 nanowires were synthesized by evaporation-condensation method and graphene oxide were synthesized using modified Hummers method for low temperature NO2 detection. Drop cast method was used to transfer graphene oxide (GO), to form composite GO-metal oxide p-n junctions. With integration of reduce graphene oxide (rGO), the UV light absorption was enhanced. This metal oxide composite has shown a reversible response in detecting low concentrations of NO2 under UV irradiation, with a working temperature range of 50–150 °C. Pure SnO2 shows 20% response to NO2 (4 ppm) in dark conditions, while the response increasesupto60%usingUVirradiationat50°C.Furthermore, SnO2/rGOshowsa40%ofresponse in dark, while the response increases to 160% under UV light illumination. This composite exhibits excellent recovery and maintains the baseline under UV light at low temperatures, which effectively overcome the drawbacks of low recovery typically shown by metal oxide gas sensors at low temperature.

1. Introduction

Air pollution has become one of the main concerns due to increased usage of automobiles and rapid industrialization. This results in a strong need of environment monitoring, a routine practice to identify and reduce gases that contributes to air pollution. Nitric oxide (NO2) is considered as one of the most toxic gases that can lead to acid rain and photochemical smog. Significant efforts have been made to detect these toxic gases, including NO2, due to serious threats they pose on flora and fauna.
Over the past years, many researches have focused in determining efficient methods of detectingNO2.Metaloxide(MOx)nanostructures, suchasSnO2nanowires(NWs),canbeconsidered as one of the most widely used materials to detect gases due to their high sensitivity, high stability and simple interface electronics. However, due to their high working temperature, these SnO2 materials are not considered as the most energy efficient method of detecting NO2. Graphene and reduce graphene oxide (rGO) are considered as promising sensitive materials for conduct ometric gas sensing owing to their high surface to volume ratio. Therefore, many studies have focused on their combination for fabricating MOx-rGO composites [1,2], to further improve the sensing performanceofbothmaterials..Thesestudieshaveshownremarkableresponseoffabricated chemical gas sensors in low temperature range. In addition, the use of UV light illumination has a positive effect on sensing properties. rGO shows good optical absorption properties, thus UV light can excite SnO2/rGO and generate electron-hole pairs on the p-n junction which could significantly improvetheholeconcentrationintherGOtoenhancethesensorresponseanddecreasetherecovery time.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. SynthesisMethod

SnO2 NWs were prepared by thermal evaporation method, directly on Alumina substrates (99.9% purity, 2mm × 2mm, Kyocera, Japan). Alumina substrates were cleaned in acetone using ultrasoundsfor15mintoremovedustparticles, then dried with a synthetic airflow. Afterwards, a thin layer of Au catalyst was deposited on alumina substrates by RF magnetron sputtering (75W argon plasma 5.5x10-3 mbar, at room temperature). To synthetize SnO2 NWs, SnO2 powder was placed in the middle of a tubular furnace and heated up to 1370 °C to promote evaporation. Alumina substrates were placed into the furnace in a colder region, where the temperature was in the range of 800 °C–950 °C. Argon gas (100 SCCM) was used to transport SnO2 vapours towards the substrates in order to promote the growth NWs, keeping a constant pressure of 100 mbar inside the tube. GO powder was dissolved in water and stirred in 300rpm for 15 min, then ultrasonicated for 15 min in order to obtain a homogeneous dispersion. A 5µL suspension of GO was drop casted on top of the SnO2 NWs and dried at room temperature.

2.2. GasTesting

Gas testing was carried out in a homemade gas chamber. Interdigitated Pt contacts and Pt heaters were deposited on alumina substrates by DC magnetron sputtering. Afterwards, these alumina substrates were mounted on TO packages using electro-soldered gold wires. The devices were placed inside a homemade test chamber to investigate the conductance variation as a function of chemical species. A fixed voltage (1V) was applied to the sensors and the total gas flow was set to 200 SCCM with 40%relative humidity. Samples were tested in 50–150 °C temperature ranges and were stabilized for 10 h for each temperature before the introduction of the test gases. Sensors wereexposedtothegasfor20minwithfixedconcentration, and then the synthetic air flow was restored to recover the base line signal. The response for the variation of conductance was calculated using following formulae, for reducing and oxidizing gases, respectively
Proceedings 02 00787 i001
Proceedings 02 00787 i002
where, GAir is the base line conductance of the sensor and GGas is the conductance of the sensor in presence of the target gas.

3. Results

3.1. Characterization and GasTesting

Figure 1 shows scanning electron microscope images of the NWs grown on the Au catalyst: thin, long and dense NWs were obtained by thermal evaporation method. It shows that rGO exhibits a gauze-like sheet morphology on top of the SnO2NWs. Figure 1b shows that rGO sheets successfully decorate SnO2 nanowires: their surface and edges can be easily distinguished.
Figure 2a shows the dynamic response of the SnO2/rGO toward NO2 in the concentrations range of 1–4 ppm under UV and without UV irradiation. Upon exposure to NO2 gas, the electrical conductance of the composites decreases, which is a typical behaviour of n-type semiconductor. It clearly shown that the SnO2/rGO composite increases the response at 50 °C under UV irradiation. Figure 2b reports the sensor response at different temperatures: the responses at 50–100–150 °C, are 153, 113 and 104 when the NO2 concentration is 4 ppm. The response is two times higher than SnO2/rGO composite, and more than eight times higher than SnO2 NWs. Figure 3 shows the influence of the temperature towards both response and recovery time. SnO2/rGO has a recovery time of about 25 min in dark, which decreases to 8 min under UV irradiation.

3.2. Gas SensingMechanism

Under UV irradiation, incident light is absorbed by SnO2 and rGO, generating electron-hole pairs. These photo-generated electrons and holes can be separated due to the effect of heterojunction, which rapidly increases the electron concentration in the SnO2 conduction band [3]. When the composite is exposed to air, oxygen molecules are easily adsorbed on the surface capturing the photo-generated electrons from the conduction band as shown in following equations [4,5].
ℎ𝜐→ℎ+ + 𝑒−
Proceedings 02 00787 i003
The sensing mechanism of the SnO2/rGO composite can be explained as follows: on the one hand, rGO sheet provides many adsorption sites for NO2 molecules owing to their high surface area, and it provides preferential pathways for the charge transport; on the other hand, SnO2 can react with NO2 molecules thanks to the high reactivity of photo generated Proceedings 02 00787 i004. The chemical reaction between NO2 and oxygen species on the surface explained through the following Equation (4):
Proceedings 02 00787 i005

4. Conclusions

In this study, SnO2 nanowires were synthesized by thermal evaporation method and GO was drop casted on top of the SnO2 nanowires to form SnO2/GO composite. Annealing process were conducted to form SnO2/rGO and these SnO2/rGO composites show good response to NO2 under UV irradiation. Furthermore, UV light enhanced response time and recovery time: this composite can be used for low-temperature NO2 gas detection.

Author Contributions

The authors contributed equally.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Erasmus mundus leader project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Geng, X.; Zhang, C.; Olivier, M.; Debliquy, M. Room Temperature NO2 Responses of Visible-Light Activated Nanosheet rGO@ZnO1−x Sensors. Proceedings 2017, 1, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  2. Munasinghe, M.A.H.M.; Comini, E.; Zappa, D.; Poli, N.; Sberveglieri, G. Low Temperature Gas Sensing PropertiesofGrapheneOxide/SnO2NanowiresCompositeforH2. ProcediaEng. 2016, 168, 305–308. [Google Scholar]
  3. Geng, X.; You, J.; Wang, J.; Zhang, C. Visible Light Assisted Nitrogen Dioxide Sensing Using Tungsten Oxide-Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite Sensors. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2017, 191, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, X.; Sun, J.; Zhang, X. Novel 3D Graphene Aerogel-ZnO Composites as Efficient Detection for NO2at Room Temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 211, 220–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, C.; Geng, X.; Li, J.; Luo, Y.; Lu, P. Role of Oxygen Vacancy in Tuning of Optical, Electrical and NO2sensingPropertiesofZnO1−xcoatingsatRoomTemperature. Sens.ActuatorsBChem. 2017, 248, 886–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM imagers of SnO2/rGO composite in different magnifications.(a) Low magnification; (b) High magnification.
Figure 1. SEM imagers of SnO2/rGO composite in different magnifications.(a) Low magnification; (b) High magnification.
Proceedings 02 00787 g001
Figure 2. (a) Dynamic response of SnO2, SnO2/rGO composite toward NO2 (1, 2. 5, 4 ppm), CO (100, 250, 500 ppm) at 50 °C and RH=40%; (b) Sensor responses toward NO2 (4 ppm) in different working temperature and RH=40%.
Figure 2. (a) Dynamic response of SnO2, SnO2/rGO composite toward NO2 (1, 2. 5, 4 ppm), CO (100, 250, 500 ppm) at 50 °C and RH=40%; (b) Sensor responses toward NO2 (4 ppm) in different working temperature and RH=40%.
Proceedings 02 00787 g002
Figure 3. Response time and recovery time of the SnO2/rGOcomposite.
Figure 3. Response time and recovery time of the SnO2/rGOcomposite.
Proceedings 02 00787 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Arachchige, H.M.M.M.; Gunawardhana, N.; Zappa, D.; Comini, E. UV Light Assisted NO2Sensing by SnO2/Graphene Oxide Composite. Proceedings 2018, 2, 787. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2130787

AMA Style

Arachchige HMMM, Gunawardhana N, Zappa D, Comini E. UV Light Assisted NO2Sensing by SnO2/Graphene Oxide Composite. Proceedings. 2018; 2(13):787. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2130787

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arachchige, Hashitha M. M. Munasinghe, Nanda Gunawardhana, Dario Zappa, and Elisabetta Comini. 2018. "UV Light Assisted NO2Sensing by SnO2/Graphene Oxide Composite" Proceedings 2, no. 13: 787. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2130787

APA Style

Arachchige, H. M. M. M., Gunawardhana, N., Zappa, D., & Comini, E. (2018). UV Light Assisted NO2Sensing by SnO2/Graphene Oxide Composite. Proceedings, 2(13), 787. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2130787

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop