Next Article in Journal
Gas Sensing Properties of Carbon Nanotubes Decorated with Iridium Oxide Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
Tomographic Measurement of Ammonia Distribution on a Hot Gas Test Bench
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Polyethylene Outgassing Study for MEMS Nuclear Radiation Sensor †

1
ICA, Université de Toulouse, 31400 Toulouse, France
2
LAAS-CNRS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INP, 31400 Toulouse, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the Eurosensors 2018 Conference, Graz, Austria, 9–12 September 2018.
Proceedings 2018, 2(13), 718; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2130718
Published: 30 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of EUROSENSORS 2018)

Abstract

:
In this paper, the out-gassing from PolyEthylene (PE) film is studied under nuclear irradiation for the design and fabrication of passive MEMS dosimeters. The fabrication of sensor needs high temperature process that leads to specific constraints on the PE film. Radiation chemical yield of hydrogen production (GH2) from PE under gamma irradiation is verified by mass spectroscopy after temperature annealing in vacuum up to 400 °C. Prototypes are fabricated to validate the fabrication of the sensor and then irradiated with high energy gamma radiation (with dose of 20 kGy). Measurements of membrane deflections after irradiation validate the GH2 factor, showing low pollution level of PE during sensor fabrication.

1. Introduction

Wireless passive (battery-less) and chip-less (without electronic circuits) sensors present interesting solution for harsh environment applications. In the case of nuclear radiation measurement, such solutions allow real time dose monitoring by remotely interrogating nuclear radiation sensors from radar reader [1].
The operating principle of the sensor is the following: when PolyEthylene (PE) placed inside a hermetic sealed cavity is subjected to nuclear irradiation, an outgassing (mainly of H2 molecules) occurs and generates a pressure on a highly resistive silicon membrane. This lead to the membrane deflection, which modify the resonant frequency of a planar microwave resonator placed just below the membrane. From the measurement of the frequency shift, the nuclear radiation dose is derived.
In our previous design (see Figure 1), a double Si/Glass stack was used for the sensor fabrication and leads to a complex technological process and non-sealed cavity for the resonator. The PE was obtained from peeling small ball and the Si/Glass2 bonding was performed under N2 using a non-collective process Moreover, the sensor sensitivity varied significantly from one sensor to another and was about 20 times higher than the simulation results [2]. The possible reason could be the pollution of PE during sensor fabrication leading to the undesirable out-gassing after irradiation. Consequently, in order to control these additional out-gassing of PE, we report here a simple, more reliable and collective technological fabrication process for passive MEMS dosimeters with a new design (see Figure 2). The process uses a simple Si/Glass stack where the calibrated 200 µm thick High Density PolyEthylene (HDPE) film and the resonator are sealed inside the same cavity under vacuum. Moreover, the millimeter-wave excitation of the resonator is performed by using a small radiating aperture [1].

2. Materials and Methods

Prototypes were designed to measure radiation chemical yield of hydrogen production (GH2) from sensing devices fabricated with technological process similar to that used for the final sensors (see Figure 3). The HDPE cavity (5 mm diameter and 290 µm depth) is etched inside a low resistivity 400 µm thick SOI wafer. The H2 out-gassing will provide the deflection of the small silicon membrane (550 µm diameter and 5µm thick) that will be monitored with optical profiler.
For GH2 = 4 × 10−7 mol/J, the pressure Pg generated by the PE is given by Equation (1) [2], where VPE and Vg denote respectively the PE volume and the volume of gas expansion:
P g [ Bar ] = 9.5 × 10 3 V PE [ mm 3 ] V g [ mm 3 ]     10 2 V PE [ mm 3 ] V g [ mm 3 ] / kGy
With dimensions given in the Figure 3, Pg ≅ 0.045 bar/10 kGy which leads a membrane deflection sensitivity of 0.23 µm/10 kGy.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. PE Properties

One of the major issue during the technological fabrication of sensors is the use of high temperature silicon/glass anodic bonding that may degrade the H2 out-gassing capabilities of HDPE. The thermo-gravimetric analysis performed under Helium (He) atmosphere shows that the degradation of HDPE occurs only above 400 °C (see Figure 4). To provide a security margin, the silicon/glass temperature bonding is then performed at 350 °C.
HDPE samples are annealed in vacuum at 350 °C and then placed in a sealed glass tube under He atmosphere. After irradiation to gamma rays (137Cs 661.7 keV, dose rate 0.3 kGy/h, dose 24 kGy), the gas composition analysis is finally performed using a quantitative gas mass spectrometer. It shows that H2 production is not affected by high temperature process (GH2 ≅ 4 × 10−7 mol/J) [3].

3.2. Prototypes Fabrication and Characterization Before Irradiation

For silicon wafer fabrication, the two main steps were: (1) the 5 µm thick membrane release and (2) the HDPE cavity fabrication with deep reactive ionic etching using 40 µm thick photoresist mask. For the glass wafer, the 10 µm depth cavity were obtained from etching in hydrofluorydric bath using Chromium/Gold mask.
After 2 min annealing at 200 °C under vacuum, 200 µm HDPE film was cut using a stamping pliers and the 3.5 mm diameter samples were placed inside the silicon cavity. Silicon and glass wafer were aligned in AML bonder, heated at 350 °C under vacuum during 30 min and then bonded at 600 V. Prototypes were fabricated using this technological process (see Figure 5). Before silicon/glass bonding, the membrane deflection is small (≅0.2 µm) and after bonding, the deflection is found to range from 5.1 µm to 5.4 µm for atmospheric pressure applied on the top of the membrane (see Figure 6). This experimental result is close to the expected value with vacuum inside the cavity (simulated sensitivity was of 5 µm/bar). After two weeks, the membrane deflection remains unchanged.
As displayed in Figure 6, the membrane sensitivity to pressure variation was also calibrated under pressure between 0.2 bar and 1 bar. For pressure between 0.8 bar and 1 bar, the sensitivity S is around 4 µm/bar.

3.3. Prototypes Characterization after Irradiation

The prototypes are irradiated to gamma rays (137Cs 661.7 keV, dose rate 0.3 kGy/h, dose 20 kGy). The membrane sensitivity to pressure was also calibrated 3 weeks after irradiation and we checked that no significant change occurred after irradiation (see Figure 6). For atmospheric pressure, the membrane deflection is reduced by 0.4µm. The pressure Pg generated inside the HDPE cavity after this irradiation can be then derived from Equation (2):
P g = Δ P o Δ D S
where ∆Po denote the atmospheric pressure variation between two measurements of membrane deflection, ∆D is the variation of the membrane deflection related to irradiation dose and S designates the membrane sensitivity around 1 bar derived from Figure 6. The pressure Pg is then found to be of 0.05 bar/10 kGy and is close to the expected value (simulation results predict a pressure of 0.045 bar/10 kGy).
After two weeks, the membrane deflection remains unchanged and consequently, we concluded that a good H2 tightness was achieved.

4. Conclusions

Prototypes based on silicon membrane were designed and fabricated to validate the fabrication process of a passive MEMS dosimeter. After irradiation to gamma rays (20 kGy), membrane deflection analysis shows that the radiation chemical yield of hydrogen production (GH2) from HDPE is close to simulation results. So few undesirable out-gassing from polyethylene occurs during prototype irradiation, validating the fabrication process with low level of HDPE pollution.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially funded by CARANUC project (Occitanie Region, France and European Funds for Regional Development) and EDF (Electricité de France) company. This work was partly supported by LAAS-CNRS micro and nanotechnologies platform, members of the French RENATECH network.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Arenas, C.; Philippe, J.; Henry, D.; Rumeau, A.; Coustou, A.; Aubert, H.; Pons, P. Wireless and Passive Nuclear Radiation Sensors. In Proceedings of the 2017 47th European Microwave Conference (EuMC) European Microwave Week, Nuremberg, Germany, 8–13 October 2017. [Google Scholar]
  2. Augustyniak, I.; Knapkiewicz, P.; Sareło, K.; Dziuban, J.A.; Debourg, E.; Pons, P.; Olszacki, M. Micromechanical high-doses radiation sensor with bossed membrane and interferometry optical detection. Sens. Actuator A 2015, 232, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Seguchi, T. Hydrogen yield from polyethylene by radiolysis and the application to dosimeter. In Proceedings of the Asian-Pacific Symposium on Radiation Chemistry, Shanghai, China, 17–21 September 2006. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Previous dosimeter design.
Figure 1. Previous dosimeter design.
Proceedings 02 00718 g001
Figure 2. New dosimeter design.
Figure 2. New dosimeter design.
Proceedings 02 00718 g002
Figure 3. Cross section of the prototype for the measurement of GH2.
Figure 3. Cross section of the prototype for the measurement of GH2.
Proceedings 02 00718 g003
Figure 4. Evolution of PE mass versus temperature.
Figure 4. Evolution of PE mass versus temperature.
Proceedings 02 00718 g004
Figure 5. Bottom views of fabricated prototypes.
Figure 5. Bottom views of fabricated prototypes.
Proceedings 02 00718 g005
Figure 6. Membrane deflection versus external pressure applied on the top of the membrane (BI: Before Irradiation, AI: After Irradiation).
Figure 6. Membrane deflection versus external pressure applied on the top of the membrane (BI: Before Irradiation, AI: After Irradiation).
Proceedings 02 00718 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kumar, D.; Philippe, J.; Charlot, S.; Assié, S.; Lecestre, A.; Ferrand, A.; Aubert, H.; Pons, P. Polyethylene Outgassing Study for MEMS Nuclear Radiation Sensor. Proceedings 2018, 2, 718. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2130718

AMA Style

Kumar D, Philippe J, Charlot S, Assié S, Lecestre A, Ferrand A, Aubert H, Pons P. Polyethylene Outgassing Study for MEMS Nuclear Radiation Sensor. Proceedings. 2018; 2(13):718. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2130718

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kumar, Dheraaj, Julien Philippe, Samuel Charlot, Sandrine Assié, Aurélie Lecestre, André Ferrand, Hervé Aubert, and Patrick Pons. 2018. "Polyethylene Outgassing Study for MEMS Nuclear Radiation Sensor" Proceedings 2, no. 13: 718. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2130718

APA Style

Kumar, D., Philippe, J., Charlot, S., Assié, S., Lecestre, A., Ferrand, A., Aubert, H., & Pons, P. (2018). Polyethylene Outgassing Study for MEMS Nuclear Radiation Sensor. Proceedings, 2(13), 718. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2130718

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop