Next Article in Journal
Soot Particle Classifications in the Context of a Resistive Sensor Study
Previous Article in Journal
A Precise Gas Dilutor Based on Binary Weighted Critical Flows to Create NO2 Concentrations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Detection of Ammonia Based on Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels †

Solid-State Electronics Laboratory, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the Eurosensors 2018 Conference, Graz, Austria, 9–12 September 2018.
Proceedings 2018, 2(13), 1109; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2131109
Published: 7 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of EUROSENSORS 2018)

Abstract

:
This article describes an ammonia-responsive hydrogel based on acrylic acid (AAc) and 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA). The influence of the hydrogel composition on swelling behavior in the alkaline range was shown. Furthermore, the hydrogel swelling in ammonia solutions was tested and a detection limit in the range of 1 mmol/L ammonia in dependence of the buffer solution was determined.

1. Introduction

Ammonia (NH3) is one of the most important inorganic compounds in chemical engineering. In 2011, 140 megatons of ammonia were produced worldwide based on the Haber–Bosch process [1]. Ammonia is one of the key compounds for the production of fertilizers, pharmaceuticals, dyes or disintegrates [2]. However, too high ammonia concentrations could be a serious health threat [3]. Therefore, it is necessary to monitor ammonia as part of ambient conditions in environmental analytics [4] or to measure the atmospheric pollution from automobiles [5]. Furthermore, ammonia could be an indicator for medical diseases like stomach ulcers due to bacterial infections [6] or a disturbed urea balance due to a kidney disorder [7]. According to the German Drinking Water Regulations from 2001, the limit value of dissolved ammonium ions in drinking water is 0.5 mg/L [8]. Depending on the application, it is necessary to detect ammonia in different concentration ranges [3].
In aqueous solution, ammonia reacts as a base (pKB = 4.75) to ammonium and hydroxide ions according to the following reaction equation [9]:
NH3 + H2O → NH4+ + OH
The result is a change in pH value, which can be detected via pH-responsive hydrogels. Hydrogels are three-dimensional polymer networks, which can absorb a huge amount of water. Due to the chemical modification by using different monomers, these gels have various swelling properties depending on different stimuli like salt concentrations, temperature or pH [10]. In this work, we present a pH-sensitive hydrogel based on acrylic acid (AAc) and 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA), which can be used for the detection of ammonia. These gels can be combined with piezoresistive pressure sensors, which can transform the swelling pressure into a measurable output voltage [11]. For example, hydrogel-based piezoresistive sensors have been used so far for the detection of the pH value [12], temperature [13], biomolecules like glucose [14] or organic solvents like ethanol [15].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis of pH-Sensitive Poly Acrylic Acid-co-Dimethylaminoethyl Methacrylate Hydrogels

For the detection of ammonia, a pH-sensitive hydrogel based on acrylic acid (AAc) and dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA) was synthesized. Thereby, hydrogel with different contents of AAc (x mol %, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and DMAEMA (100-x mol %, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were combined with 1 mol % of the crosslinker bisacrylamide (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany). In all cases, the total concentration of AAc and DMAEMA was 1.6 mol/L [16]. After degassing the pregel solution with nitrogen for 5 min, the polymerization was initiated with 1 mol % ammonium peroxodisulfate (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 1 mol % N,N,N,N′-tetramethylethylenediamine (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany). The total volume of a synthesis approach was 600 µL. The pregel solution was filled in a vial shell (1 mL, VWR, Radnor, PA, USA) and polymerized overnight in an oven at 35 °C. After polymerization, vial shells were carefully smashed without damaging the hydrogel. One tablet of a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4, I = 0.15 mol/L, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was dissolved in 200 mL distilled water. The gels were cut in small pieces with a thickness of about 5 mm and were washed in PBS buffer, pH 7.4, for 3 days to remove unreacted monomers.

2.2. Swelling Studies at Different pH Values

After washing, the gels were conditioned fivefold in PBS solutions (pH 7.4 ⇆ pH 10). The pH values were adjusted by a sodium hydroxide solution (0.1 mol/L) using a pH meter. Subsequently, the gels were washed in PBS buffer, pH 7.4, and the initial mass of the hydrogel m0 was measured. After incubating in a PBS buffer with a defined pH value for overall 24 h, whereby the buffer changed five times every 1–2 h to wash the gel, the hydrogel mass m after swelling and the pH value of the solution were detected. In the following measurements, the gels were incubated in a new PBS buffer with another pH values. The swelling degree S was calculated with the following formula:
S = (mm0)/m0

2.3. Swelling Studies at Different Ammonia Concentrations

Swelling studies were performed in PBS buffer and in an isotonic saline solution (NaCl, 9 g/L, I = 0.15 mol/L). After washing and conditioning, the initial mass of the hydrogel m0 and the pH value were measured in PBS or NaCl solution without NH3. Ammonium hydroxide (~1 mol/L ammonia in water, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used to prepare a 1 mol/L ammonia stock solution in PBS and NaCl buffer. A solution with a defined NH3 concentration was prepared with the stock solution and the gels were incubated for 24 h. After determination of the hydrogel mass m, the pH value and the swelling degree S (1), the hydrogels were placed in a solution with another ammonia concentration for 24 h.

3. Results and Discussion

The swelling degree of poly(AAc-co-DMAEMA) hydrogels in dependence on the pH value for different monomer contents is shown in Figure 1a.
Hydrogels having compositions of 50–70 mol % AAc and 30–50 mol % DMAEMA were successfully synthesized. For hydrogels with more than 70 mol % AAc, no complete polymerization was observed under the described conditions. Furthermore, hydrogels with more than 50 mol % DMAEMA could not be utilized under mechanical stress.
Hydrogels based on polyAAc swell under basic conditions because of the deprotonation of the carboxyl group and, thus, an increase of the electrostatic repulsion of the carboxylate anions in the gel [17]. In literature, the pKA value of polyAAc was determined from 5.35 to 7.2 [18]. As a result, the deprotonation should be in a more acidic range. Through the basic monomer DMAEMA (pkB = 7.8 [10]), the operation range of the gel was shifted towards a more alkaline range [16].
The higher the content of DMAEMA is, the higher becomes the swelling degree of the hydrogels. However, the polymer system with the highest swelling degree shows a non-linear swelling behavior. Hydrogels with 60 mol % AAc and 40 mol % DMAEMA were used in the following experiments because these gels have a linear swelling behavior over a large pH range and show a high sensitivity.
Figure 1. Results of the swelling studies: (a) Swelling degree of poly (AAc-co-DMAEMA) hydrogels versus pH value for different monomer contents in PBS buffer; (b) Swelling behavior of poly(AAc-co-DMAEMA) (60% AAc, 40% DMAEMA) hydrogels and resulting pH value for different ammonia concentrations in PBS buffer and isotonic saline solutions (NaCl).
Figure 1. Results of the swelling studies: (a) Swelling degree of poly (AAc-co-DMAEMA) hydrogels versus pH value for different monomer contents in PBS buffer; (b) Swelling behavior of poly(AAc-co-DMAEMA) (60% AAc, 40% DMAEMA) hydrogels and resulting pH value for different ammonia concentrations in PBS buffer and isotonic saline solutions (NaCl).
Proceedings 02 01109 g001
Figure 1b shows the swelling of poly(AAc-co-DMAEMA) hydrogels at different ammonia concentrations in PBS buffer and in an isotonic saline solution. With increasing the ammonia concentration, the pH value of the solution increases significantly. This results in a swelling of the pH-sensitive hydrogel. Even small concentrations can be detected via swelling of the hydrogel. It was possible to detect small changes in pH value via hydrogel swelling. With this polymer system, it was also possible to detect small concentrations of ammonia. Furthermore, a difference in the detection limit between PBS solution and isotonic saline solution could be observed. PBS buffer should keep the pH value in the physiological range as constant as possible. Through the phosphate buffer, small changes in pH value can be compensated in solution. With changing the ammonia concentration from 0 mmol/L to 1 mmol/L NH3, the pH value increased only from pH 7.59 to pH 7.79 (∆pH = 0.20) in PBS buffer. However, in an isotonic saline solution, the pH value increased from pH 7.23 to pH 8.31 (∆pH = 1.08). As a result, a significant swelling of the hydrogels could be detected only in sodium chloride solution. The corresponding detection limit amounts to ca. 1 mmol/L NH3. In PBS buffer, a substantial swelling of the hydrogels was observed of concentrations of more than 2 mmol/L NH3. At higher ammonia concentrations, no relevant difference between the buffer solutions could be seen.

4. Conclusions

Based on poly(AAc-co-DMAEMA) hydrogels, it was possible to detect ammonia in solutions within the low millimolar range. The detection limit depends on the used buffer solution and could be less than 1 mmol/L NH3. This hydrogel system can be used especially for the detection of low concentrations of ammonia between 1 mmol/L and 20 mmol/L, which is of particular interest for applications in environmental or biomedical analysis.

Author Contributions

J.E., M.G. and G.G. conceived and designed the experiments; J.E. performed the experiments; J.E. analyzed the data; J.E. wrote the paper.

Acknowledgments

This work is a result of the Research Training Group “Hydrogel-based microsystems” (GRK 1865) funded by the “Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft” (DFG).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Milton, R.D.; Cai, R.; Abdellaoui, S.; Leech, D.; De Lacey, A.L.; Pita, M.; Minteer, S.D. Bioelectrochemical Haber-Bosch Process: An Ammonia-Producing H2 /N2 Fuel Cell. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 2680–2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Schlögl, R. Katalytische Ammoniaksynthese – eine “unendliche Geschichte”? Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 2050–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Timmer, B.; Olthuis, W.; van den Berg, A. Ammonia sensors and their applications—A review. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2005, 107, 666–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Erisman, J.W.; Otjes, R.; Hensen, A.; Jongejan, P.; van den Bulk, P.; Khlystov, A.; Möls, H.; Slanina, S. Instrument development and application in studies and monitoring of ambient ammonia. Atmos. Environ. 2001, 35, 1913–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Durbin, T.D.; Wilson, R.D.; Norbeck, J.M.; Miller, J.W.; Huai, T.; Rhee, S.H. Estimates of the emission rates of ammonia from light-duty vehicles using standard chassis dynamometer test cycles. Atmos. Environ. 2002, 36, 1475–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kearney, D.J.; Hubbard, T.; Putnam, D. Breath Ammonia Measurement in Helicobacter pylori Infection. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2002, 47, 2523–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Narasimhan, L.R.; Goodman, W.; Patel, C.K.N. Correlation of breath ammonia with blood urea nitrogen and creatinine during hemodialysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 4617–4621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Verordnung über die Qualität von Wasser für den menschlichen Gebrauch (Trinkwasserverordnung—TrinkwV 2001). Available online: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/trinkwv_2001/TrinkwV_2001.pdf (accessed on 6 June 2018).
  9. Çaglar, P.; Narayanaswamy, R. Ammonia-sensitive fibre optic probe utilising an immobilised spectrophotometric indicator. Analyst 1987, 112, 1285–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Guenther, M.; Wallmersperger, T.; Gerlach, G. Piezoresistive Chemical Sensors Based on Functionalized Hydrogels. Chemosensors 2014, 2, 145–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Guenther, M.; Gerlach, G. Hydrogels for Chemical Sensors. In Hydrogel Sensors and Actuators: Engineering and Technology; Gerlach, G., Arndt, K.-F., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010; pp. 165–195. ISBN 978-3-540-75645-3. [Google Scholar]
  12. Trinh, Q.T.; Gerlach, G.; Sorber, J.; Arndt, K.-F. Hydrogel-based piezoresistive pH sensors: Design, simulation and output characteristics. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2006, 117, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Franke, D.; Binder, S.; Gerlach, G. Performance of Fast-Responsive, Porous Crosslinked Poly(N-Isopropylacrylamide) in a Piezoresistive Microsensor. IEEE Sens. Lett. 2017, 1, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Schmidt, U.; Jorsch, C.; Guenther, M.; Gerlach, G. Biochemical piezoresistive sensors based on hydrogels for biotechnology and medical applications. J. Sens. Sens. Syst. 2016, 5, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Erfkamp, J.; Guenther, M.; Gerlach, G. Hydrogel-based piezoresistive sensor for the detection of ethanol. J. Sens. Sens. Syst. 2018, 7, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhai, M.; Chen, Y.; Yi, M.; Ha, H. Swelling behaviour of a new kind of polyampholyte hydrogel composed of dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate and acrylic acid. Polym. Int. 2004, 53, 33–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Turan, E.; Çaykara, T. Swelling and network parameters of pH-sensitive poly(acrylamide-co-acrylic acid) hydrogels. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 106, 2000–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Park, H.; Robinson, J.R. Mechanisms of Mucoadhesion of Poly(acrylic Acid) Hydrogels. Pharm. Res. 1987, 4, 457–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Erfkamp, J.; Guenther, M.; Gerlach, G. Detection of Ammonia Based on Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels. Proceedings 2018, 2, 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2131109

AMA Style

Erfkamp J, Guenther M, Gerlach G. Detection of Ammonia Based on Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels. Proceedings. 2018; 2(13):1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2131109

Chicago/Turabian Style

Erfkamp, Jan, Margarita Guenther, and Gerald Gerlach. 2018. "Detection of Ammonia Based on Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels" Proceedings 2, no. 13: 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2131109

APA Style

Erfkamp, J., Guenther, M., & Gerlach, G. (2018). Detection of Ammonia Based on Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels. Proceedings, 2(13), 1109. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2131109

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop